Ionic interactions at both inter-ring contact sites of GroEL are involved in transmission of the allosteric signal: a time-resolved infrared difference study

The biological activity of the double-ring chaperonin GroEL is regulated by complex allosteric interactions, which include positive intra-ring and negative inter-ring cooperativity. To further characterize inter-ring communication, the nucleotide-induced absorbance changes in the vibrational spectrum of the chaperonin GroEL, of two single-point mutants suppressing one inter-ring ionic contact (E461K and E434K) and of a single-ring version of this protein, were investigated by time-resolved infrared difference spectroscopy. Interaction of the nucleotide with the proteins was triggered by its photochemical release from a biologically inactive caged precursor [P3-1-(2-nitro) phenylethyl nucleotide]. The results indicate that (1) ATP binding to the protein induces a conformational change that affects concomitantly both intra-ring and inter-ring communication, and (2) the experimental absorbance changes are sensitive to the double-ring structure of the protein. The characterization of the single-point, inter-ring mutants demonstrates that ionic interactions at both contact sites are involved in the transmission of the allosteric signal. However, both mutations have different effects on the inter-ring interface. While that of E461K still retains ionic contacts sensitive to ATP binding, E434K shows spectroscopic features similar to those of the single-ring version of the protein, therefore suggesting that electrostatic interactions at these contact sites contribute differently to the stability of the inter-ring interface.     

Salt bridges at the inter-ring interface regulate the thermostat of GroEL

The chaperonin GroEL consists of a double-ring structure made of identical subunits and displays unusual allosteric properties caused by the interaction between its constituent subunits. Cooperative binding of ATP to a protein ring allows binding of GroES to that ring, and at the same time negative inter-ring cooperativity discharges the ligands from the opposite ring, thus driving the protein-folding cycle. Biochemical and electron microscopy analysis of wild type GroEL, a single-ring mutant (SR1), and two mutants with one inter-ring salt bridge of the chaperonin disrupted (E461K and E434K) indicate that these ion pairs form part of the interactions that allow the inter-ring allosteric signal to be transmitted. The wild type-like activities of the ion pair mutants at 25 degrees C are in contrast with their lack of inter-ring communication and folding activity at physiological temperatures. These salt bridges stabilize the inter-ring interface and maintain the inter-ring spacing so that functional communication between protein heptamers takes place. The characterization of GroEL hybrids containing different amounts of wild type and mutant subunits also indicates that as the number of inter-ring salt bridges increases the functional properties of the hybrids recover. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that inter-ring salt bridges form a stabilizing ring-shaped, ionic zipper that ensures inter-ring communication at the contact sites and therefore a functional protein-folding cycle. Furthermore, they regulate the chaperonin thermostat, allowing GroEL to distinguish physiological (37 degrees C) from stress temperatures (42 degrees C).     

Crystal structure of the temperature-sensitive and allosteric-defective chaperonin GroELE461K

The chaperonin GroEL adopts a double-ring structure with various modes of allosteric communication. The simultaneous positive intra-ring and negative inter-ring co-operativities alternate the functionality of the folding cavities in both protein rings. Negative inter-ring co-operativity is maintained through different inter-ring interactions, including a salt bridge involving Glu 461. Replacement of this residue by Lys modifies the temperature sensitivity of the substrate-folding activity of this protein, most likely as a result of the loss of inter-ring co-operativity. The crystal structure of the mutant chaperonin GroELE461K has been determined at 3.3A and compared with other structures: the wild-type GroEL, an allosteric defective GroEL double mutant and the GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 complex. The inter-ring region of the mutant exhibits the following characteristics: (i) no salt-bridge stabilizes the inter-ring interface; (ii) the mutated residue plays a central role in defining the relative ring rotation (of about 22 degrees) around the 7-fold axis; (iii) an increase in the inter-ring distance and solvent accessibility of the inter-ring interface; and (iv) a 2-fold reduction in the stabilization energy of the inter-ring interface, due to the modification of inter-ring interactions. These characteristics explain how the thermal sensitivity of the protein's fundamental properties permits GroEL to distinguish physiological (37 degrees C) from stress (42 degrees C) temperatures.     

Inter-ring communication allows the GroEL chaperonin complex to distinguish between different substrates

The productive folding of substrate proteins by the GroEL complex of Escherichia coli requires the activity of both the chaperonin rings. These heptameric rings were shown to regulate the chaperonins' affinity for substrates and co-chaperonin via inter-ring communications; however, the molecular details of the interactions are not well understood. We have investigated the effect of substrate binding on inter-ring communications of the chaperonin complex, both the double-ring GroEL as well as the single-ring SR1 chaperonin in complex with four different substrates by using mass spectrometry. This approach shows that whereas SR1 is unable to distinguish between Rubisco, gp23, gp5, and MDH, GroEL shows clear differences upon binding these substrates. The most distinctive binding behavior is observed for Rubisco, which only occupies one GroEL ring. Both bacteriophage capsid proteins (gp23 and gp5) as well as MDH are able to bind to the two GroEL rings simultaneously. Our data suggest that inter-ring communication allows the chaperonin complex to differentiate between substrates. Using collision induced dissociation in the gas phase, differences between the chaperonin(substrate) complexes are observed only when both rings are present. The data indicate that the size of the substrate is an important factor that determines the degree of stabilization of the chaperonin complex.     

Evidence that beta-tubulin induces a conformation change in the cytosolic chaperonin which stabilizes binding: implications for the mechanism of action

The class II chaperonin CCT facilitates protein folding by a process that is not well-understood. One striking feature of this chaperonin is its apparent selectivity in vivo, folding only actin, tubulin, and several other proteins. In contrast, the class I chaperonin GroEL is thought to facilitate the folding of many proteins within Escherichia coli. It has been proposed that this apparent selectivity is associated with certain regions of a substrate protein's primary structure. Using limiting amounts of beta-tubulin, beta-tubulin mutants, and beta-tubulin/ftsZ chimeras, we assessed the contribution of select regions of beta-tubulin to CCT binding. In a complementary study, we investigated inter-ring communication in CCT where we exploited polypeptide binding sensitivity to nucleotide to quantitate nucleotide binding. beta-Tubulin bound with a high apparent affinity to CCT in the absence of nucleotide (apparent K(D) approximately 3 nM; its apparent binding free energy, DeltaG, ca. -11.8 kcal/mol). Despite this, the interactions appear to be weak and distributed throughout much of the sequence, although certain sites ("hot spots") may interact somewhat more strongly with CCT. Globally averaged over the beta-tubulin sequence, these interactions appear to contribute ca. -9 to -11 cal/mol per residue, and to account for no more than 50-60% of the total binding free energy. We propose that a conformation change or deformation induced in CCT by substrate binding provides the missing free energy which stabilizes the binary complex. We suggest that by coupling CCT deformation with polypeptide binding, CCT avoids the need for high "intrinsic" affinities for its substrates. This strategy allows for dynamic interactions between chaperonin and bound substrate, which may facilitate folding on the interior surface of CCT in the absence of nucleotide and/or productive release of bound polypeptide into the central cavity upon subsequent MgATP binding. CCT displayed negative inter-ring cooperativity like GroEL. When ring 1 of CCT bound MgATP or beta-tubulin, the affinity of ring 2 for polypeptide or nucleotide was apparently reduced approximately 100-fold.     

Affinity chromatography of GroEL chaperonin based on denatured proteins: Role of electrostatic interactions in regulation of GroEL affinity for protein substrates

The chaperonin GroEL of the heat shock protein family from Escherichia coli cells can bind various polypeptides lacking rigid tertiary structure and thus prevent their nonspecific association and provide for acquisition of native conformation. In the present work we studied the interaction of GroEL with six denatured proteins (alpha-lactalbumin, ribonuclease A, egg lysozyme in the presence of dithiothreitol, pepsin, beta-casein, and apocytochrome c) possessing negative or positive total charge at neutral pH values and different in hydrophobicity (affinity for a hydrophobic probe ANS). To prevent the influence of nonspecific association of non-native proteins on their interaction with GroEL and make easier the recording of the complexing, the proteins were covalently attached to BrCN-activated Sepharose. At low ionic strength (lower than 60 mM), tight binding of the negatively charged denatured proteins with GroEL (which is also negatively charged) needed relatively low concentrations (approximately 10 mM) of bivalent cations Mg2+ or Ca2+. At the high ionic strength (approximately 600 mM), a tight complex was produced also in the absence of bivalent cations. In contrast, positively charged denatured proteins tightly interacted with GroEL irrespectively of the presence of bivalent cations and ionic strength of the solution (from 20 to 600 mM). These features of GroEL interaction with positively and negatively charged denatured proteins were confirmed by polarized fluorescence (fluorescence anisotropy). The findings suggest that the affinity of GroEL for denatured proteins can be determined by the balance of hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions.     

Synchronized domain-opening motion of GroEL is essential for communication between the two rings

Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL consists of two stacked rings of seven identical subunits each. Accompanying binding of ATP and GroES to one ring of GroEL, that ring undergoes a large en bloc domain movement, in which the apical domain twists upward and outward. A mutant GroEL(AEX) (C138S,C458S,C519S,D83C,K327C) in the oxidized form is locked in a closed conformation by an interdomain disulfide cross-link and cannot hydrolyze ATP (Murai, N., Makino, Y., and Yoshida, M. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 28229-28234). By reconstitution of GroEL complex from subunits of both wild-type GroEL and oxidized GroEL(AEX), hybrid GroEL complexes containing various numbers of oxidized GroEL(AEX) subunits were prepared. ATPase activity of the hybrid GroEL containing one or two oxidized GroEL(AEX) subunits per ring was about 70% higher than that of wild-type GroEL. Based on the detailed analysis of the ATPase activity, we concluded that inter-ring negative cooperativity was lost in the hybrid GroEL, indicating that synchronized opening of the subunits in one ring is necessary for the negative cooperativity. Indeed, hybrid GroEL complex reconstituted from subunits of wild-type and GroEL mutant (D398A), which is ATPase-deficient but can undergo domain opening motion, retained the negative cooperativity of ATPase. In contrast, the ability of GroEL to assist protein folding was impaired by the presence of a single oxidized GroEL(AEX) subunit in a ring. Taken together, cooperative conformational transitions in GroEL rings ensure the functional communication between the two rings of GroEL.     

Allostery Wiring Diagrams in the Transitions that Drive the GroEL Reaction Cycle

Determining the network of residues that transmit allosteric signals is crucial to understanding the function of biological nanomachines. During the course of a reaction cycle, biological machines in general, and Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL in particular, undergo large-scale conformational changes in response to ligand binding. Normal mode analyses, based on structure-based coarse-grained models where each residue is represented by an α carbon atom, have been widely used to describe the motions encoded in the structures of proteins. Here, we propose a new C^α-side chain elastic network model of proteins that includes information about the physical identity of each residue and accurately accounts for the side-chain topology and packing within the structure. Using the C^α-side chain elastic network model and the structural perturbation method, which probes the response of a local perturbation at a given site at all other sites in the structure, we determine the network of key residues (allostery wiring diagram) responsible for the T → R and R″ → T transitions in GroEL. A number of residues, both within a subunit and at the interface of two adjacent subunits, are found to be at the origin of the positive cooperativity in the ATP-driven T → R transition. Of particular note are residues G244, R58, D83, E209, and K327. Of these, R38, D83, and K327 are highly conserved. G244 is located in the apical domain at the interface between two subunits; E209 and K327 are located in the apical domain, toward the center of a subunit; R58 and D83 are equatorial domain residues. The allostery wiring diagram shows that the network of residues are interspersed throughout the structure. Residues D83, V174, E191, and D359 play a critical role in the R″ → T transition, which implies that mutations of these residues would compromise the ATPase activity. D83 and E191 are also highly conserved; D359 is moderately conserved. The negative cooperativity between the rings in the R″ → T transition is orchestrated through several interface residues within a single ring, including N10, E434, D435, and E451. Signal from the trans ring that is transmitted across the interface between the equatorial domains is responsible for the R″ → T transition. The cochaperonin GroES plays a passive role in the R″ → T transition. Remarkably, the binding affinity of GroES for GroEL is allosterically linked to GroEL residues 350-365 that span helices K and L. The movements of helices K and L alter the polarity of the cavity throughout the GroEL functional cycle and undergo large-scale motions that are anticorrelated with the other apical domain residues. The allostery wiring diagrams for the T → R and R″ → T transitions of GroEL provide a microscopic foundation for the cooperativity (anticooperativity) within (between) the ring (rings). Using statistical coupling analysis, we extract evolutionarily linked clusters of residues in GroEL and GroES. We find that several substrate protein binding residues as well as sites related to ATPase activity belong to a single functional network in GroEL. For GroES, the mobile loop residues and GroES/GroES interface residues are linked.     

Structures of unliganded and ATP-bound states of the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL by cryoelectron microscopy

We have developed an angular refinement procedure incorporating correction for the microscope contrast transfer function, to determine cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of the Escherichia coli chaperonin GroEL in its apo and ATP-bound forms. This image reconstruction procedure is verified to 13-A resolution by comparison of the cryo-EM structure of unliganded GroEL with the crystal structure. Binding, encapsulation, and release of nonnative proteins by GroEL and its cochaperone GroES are controlled by the binding and hydrolysis of ATP. Seven ATP molecules bind cooperatively to one heptameric ring of GroEL. This binding causes long-range conformational changes that determine the orientations of remote substrate-binding sites, and it also determines the conformation of subunits in the opposite ring of GroEL, in a negatively cooperative mechanism. The conformation of GroEL-ATP was determined at approximately 15-A resolution. In one ring of GroEL-ATP, the apical (substrate-binding) domains are extremely disordered, consistent with the high mobility needed for them to achieve the 60 degrees elevation and 90 degrees twist of the GroES-bound state. Unexpectedly, ATP binding also increases the separation between the two rings, although the interring contacts are present in the density map.     

The substrate recognition mechanisms in chaperonins

Chaperonins are a family of proteins devoted to assisting the folding of other proteins. They are large oligomers assembled into ring structures that enclose a cavity in which folding takes place. For this process to occur, the chaperonin must first recognize and interact with the unfolded polypeptide, then undergo a conformational change upon nucleotide binding that results in the closure of the cavity which in turn mediates the folding reaction inside the cavity. Although this general mechanism seems to apply to every chaperonin studied so far, there exist two different modes of interaction between the chaperonin and the substrate. The first occurs mainly through the interaction between the exposed hydrophobic residues of the unfolded polypeptides and those of the chaperonin substrate binding site, as elucidated for the chaperonin GroEL from E. coli. The second type of mechanism has been described so far only for the cytosolic chaperonin CCT (Chaperonin Containing TCP-1) and here the interaction seems to be of a more specific nature, involving charged and polar residues in both the chaperonin and the substrate, which interacts with CCT in a structured, quasi-native conformation.     

Stopped-flow fluorescence analysis of the conformational changes in the GroEL apical domain: relationships between movements in the apical domain and the quaternary structure of GroEL

GroEL undergoes numerous conformational alterations in the course of facilitating the folding of various proteins, and the specific movements of the GroEL apical domain are of particular importance in the molecular mechanism. In order to monitor in detail the numerous movements of the GroEL apical domain, we have constructed a mutant chaperonin (GroEL R231W) with wild type-like function and a fluorescent probe introduced into the apical domain. By monitoring the tryptophan fluorescence changes of GroEL R231W upon ATP addition in the presence and absence of the co-chaperonin GroES, we detected a total of four distinct kinetic phases that corresponded to conformational changes of the apical domain and GroES binding. By introducing this mutation into a single ring variant of GroEL (GroEL SR-1), we determined the extent of inter-ring cooperation that was involved in apical domain movements. Surprisingly, we found that the apical domain movements of GroEL were affected only slightly by the change in quaternary structure. Our experiments provide a number of novel insights regarding the dynamic movements of this protein.     

Conformational changes in the chaperonin GroEL: new insights into the allosteric mechanism

Conformational changes are known to play a crucial role in the function of the bacterial GroE chaperonin system. Here, results are presented from an essential dynamics analysis of known experimental structures and from computer simulations of GroEL using the CONCOORD method. The results indicate a possible direct form of inter-ring communication associated with internal fluctuations in the nucleotide-binding domains upon nucleotide and GroES binding that are involved in the allosteric mechanism of GroEL. At the level of conformational transitions in entire GroEL rings, nucleotide-induced structural changes were found to be distinct and in principle uncoupled from changes occurring upon GroES binding. However, a coupling is found between nucleotide-induced conformational changes and GroES-mediated transitions, but only in simulations of GroEL double rings, and not in simulations of single rings. This provides another explanation for the fact that GroEL functions a double ring system.     

A mutant chaperonin with rearranged inter-ring electrostatic contacts and temperature-sensitive dissociation

The chaperonin GroEL assists protein folding through ATP-dependent, cooperative movements that alternately create folding chambers in its two rings. The substitution E461K at the interface between these two rings causes temperature-sensitive, defective protein folding in Escherichia coli. To understand the molecular defect, we have examined the mutant chaperonin by cryo-EM. The normal out-of-register alignment of contacts between subunits of opposing wild-type rings is changed in E461K to an in-register one. This is associated with loss of cooperativity in ATP binding and hydrolysis. Consistent with the loss of negative cooperativity between rings, the cochaperonin GroES binds simultaneously to both E461K rings. These GroES-bound structures were unstable at higher temperature, dissociating into complexes of single E461K rings associated with GroES. Lacking the allosteric signal from the opposite ring, these complexes cannot release their GroES and become trapped, dead-end states.     

An electrostatic basis for the stability of thermophilic proteins

Two factors provide key contributions to the stability of thermophilic proteins relative to their mesophilic homologues: electrostatic interactions of charged residues in the folded state and the dielectric response of the folded protein. The dielectric response for proteins in a "thermophilic series" globally modulates the thermal stability of its members, with the calculated dielectric constant for the protein increasing from mesophiles to hyperthermophiles. This variability results from differences in the distribution of charged residues on the surface of the protein, in agreement with structural and genetic observations. Furthermore, the contribution of electrostatic interactions to the stability of the folded state is more favorable for thermophilic proteins than for their mesophilic homologues. This leads to the conclusion that electrostatic interactions play an important role in determining the stability of proteins at high temperatures. The interplay between electrostatic interactions and dielectric response also provides further rationalization for the enhanced stability of thermophilic proteins with respect to cold-denaturation. Taken together, the distribution of charged residues and their fluctuations have been shown to be factors in modulating protein stability over the entire range of biologically relevant temperatures.     

The interaction of beta(2)-glycoprotein I domain V with chaperonin GroEL: the similarity with the domain V and membrane interaction

To clarify the mechanism of interaction between chaperonin GroEL and substrate proteins, we studied the conformational changes; of the fifth domain of human beta(2)-glycoprotein I upon binding to GroEL. The fifth domain has a large flexible loop, containing several hydrophobic residues surrounded by positively charged residues, which has been proposed to be responsible for the binding of beta(2)-glycoprotein I to negatively charged phospholipid membranes. The reduction by dithiothreitol of the three intramolecular disulfide bonds of the fifth domain was accelerated in the presence of stoichiometric amounts of GroEL, indicating that the fifth domain was destabilized upon interaction with GroEL. To clarify the GroEL-induced destabilization at the atomic level, we performed H/(2)H exchange of amide protons using heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy. The presence of GroEL promoted the H/(2)H exchange of most of the protected amide protons, suggesting that, although the flexible loop of the fifth domain is likely to be responsible for the initiation of binding to GroEL, the interaction with GroEL destabilizes the overall conformation of the fifth domain.     

Annealing function of GroEL: structural and bioinformatic analysis

The Escherichia coli chaperonin system, GroEL–GroES, facilitates folding of substrate proteins (SPs) that are otherwise destined to aggregate. The iterative annealing mechanism suggests that the allostery-driven GroEL transitions leading to changes in the microenvironment of the SP constitutes the annealing action of chaperonins. To describe the molecular basis for the changes in the nature of SP–GroEL interactions we use the crystal structures of GroEL (T state), GroEL–ATP (R state) and the GroEL–GroES–(ADP)₇ (R″ state) complex to determine the residue-specific changes in the accessible surface area and the number of tertiary contacts as a result of the T→R→R″ transitions. We find large changes in the accessible area in many residues in the apical domain, but relatively smaller changes are associated with residues in the equatorial domain. In the course of the T→R transition the microenvironment of the SP changes which suggests that GroEL is an annealing machine even without GroES. This is reflected in the exposure of Glu386 which loses six contacts in the T→R transition. We also evaluate the conservation of residues that participate in the various chaperonin functions. Multiple sequence alignments and chemical sequence entropy calculations reveal that, to a large extent, only the chemical identities and not the residues themselves important for the nominal functions (peptide binding, nucleotide binding, GroES and substrate protein release) are strongly conserved. Using chemical sequence entropy, which is computed by classifying aminoacids into four types (hydrophobic, polar, positively charged and negatively charged) we make several new predictions that are relevant for peptide binding and annealing function of GroEL. We identify a number of conserved peptide binding sites in the apical domain which coincide with those found in the 1.7 Å crystal structure of ‘mini-chaperone’ complexed with the N-terminal tag. Correlated mutations in the HSP60 family, that might control allostery in GroEL, are also strongly conserved. Most importantly, we find that charged solvent-exposed residues in the T state (Lys 226, Glu 252 and Asp 253) are strongly conserved. This leads to the prediction that mutating these residues, that control the annealing function of the SP, can decrease the efficacy of the chaperonin function.     

Analysis of Mutationally Altered Forms of the Cct6 Subunit of the Chaperonin from Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

The Cct double-ring chaperonin complex of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is comprised of eight essential subunits, Cct1p-Cct8p, and assists the folding of substrates such as actins and tubulins. Single and multiple amino acid replacements of Cct6p were constructed by oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis, including changes of charged to alanine residues and uncharged to charged residues. The replacements were targeted, in part, to residues corresponding to functionally critical regions identified in the published crystal structure of the Escherichia coli chaperonin, GroEL. Here, we report the critical hydrophobic residues and clusters of hydrophilic residues in regions corresponding to those from the apical domain of GroEL implicated in peptide binding and peptide release, and certain residues in the putative equatorial domain implicated in subunit-to-subunit interaction. In contrast to their homologous counterparts in Cct2p and Cct1p, the highly conserved putative ATP binding motifs of Cct6p were relatively amenable to mutations. Our data suggest that the entire Cct6p molecule might be essential for assembly of Cct complex and might participate in binding substrates. However, there appeared to exist a functional hierarchy in ATP binding/hydrolysis among Cct subunits, as suggested by the high tolerance of Cct6p to mutations within the putative ATP binding pocket.     

A kinetic analysis of the nucleotide-induced allosteric transitions in a single-ring mutant of GroEL

The function of GroE requires a complex system of allosteric communication driven by protein-nucleotide interactions. These rearrangements couple the binding and hydrolysis of ATP to an overall reaction cycle in which substrate proteins are bound, encapsulated and released. Positive cooperativity with respect to ATP binding occurs within one heptameric ring of GroEL, while negative cooperativity between the two rings generates an inherent asymmetry between the two rings. A previously engineered mutant of GroEL in which the ring-ring contacts are broken gives rise to a single-ring version of the wild-type chaperonin (SR1). We have studied the kinetics of the nucleotide-induced conformational changes in a single-tryptophan variant of SR1 (Y485W-SR1) and compared the resulting data with those we reported previously for the double-ring, single-tryptophan variant of wild-type GroEL (Y485W-GroEL). Remarkably, the parting of the rings does not have a major effect on the conformational changes occurring within the heptameric ring and a kinetic model is presented to describe the sequence of structural rearrangements that occur upon ATP binding to the SR1 molecule. The observation that both the ATP-induced and ADP-induced conformational rearrangements occur more rapidly in the SR1 than they do in wild-type GroEL, indicates that intra-ring conformational changes in the double-ring structure must overcome conformational constraints provided by the presence of the second ring. Lastly, the data presented here imply a role for inter-ring allostery in controlling the dissociation-association behaviour of the GroES co-protein in the overall reaction cycle.     

Crystal structure of chaperonin-60 from Paracoccus denitrificans

The crystal structure of chaperonin-60 from Paracoccus denitrificans (P.cpn60) has been determined at 3.2 A resolution by the molecular replacement method. Two heptameric rings of identical subunits of P.cpn60 in adjacent asymmetric units are stacked in a back-to-back manner and form a cylinder, as found in GroEL, cpn60 from Escherichia coli. With respect to the unliganded GroEL structure, each subunit of P.cpn60 tilts 2 degrees outwards and the apical domain twists 4 degrees counter-clockwise in the top view in a hinge-like manner, rendering the central hole 5 A wider. Despite the subunit tilts, both rings in P.cpn60 contact at two sites of the equatorial domain in the same way as in GroEL. Interactions between residues 434 and 434, and 463 and 463 observed in GroEL were not found in P.cpn60, and the interaction between 452 and 461 was weaker in P.cpn60 than in GroEL. The unique hydrogen bond between 468 and 471 was observed at the right site in P.cpn60, which could account for why the subunits tilt outwards. The contact surface area was reduced at the left site, which is similar to the observed changes in the GroEL structures induced by ATP binding. In general, inter-ring interactions in P.cpn60 were weakened, which is consistent with findings that P.cpn60 is observed in single-ring forms as well as in double-ring forms.