Interaction of 9-O-(ω-amino) alkyl ether berberine analogs with poly(dT)·poly(dA)*poly(dT) triplex and poly(dA)·poly(dT) duplex: a comparative study

Isoquinoline alkaloids and their analogs represent an important class of molecules for their broad range of clinical and pharmacological utility. These compounds are of current interest owing to their low toxicity and excellent chemo preventive properties. These alkaloids can play important role in stabilising the nucleic acid triple helices. The present study has focused on the interaction of five 9-O-(ω-amino) alkyl ether berberine analogs with the DNA triplex poly(dT)·poly(dA)*poly(dT) and the parent duplex poly(dA)·poly(dT) studied using various biophysical techniques. Scatchard analysis of the spectral data indicated that the analogs bind both to the duplex and triplex in a non-cooperative manner in contrast to the cooperative binding of berberine to the DNA triplex. Strong intercalative binding to the DNA triplex structure was revealed from ferrocyanide quenching, fluorescence polarization and viscosity results. Thermal melting studies demonstrated higher stabilization of the Hoogsteen base paired third strand of the DNA triplex compared to the Watson–Crick strand. Circular dichroism studies suggested a stronger perturbation of the DNA triplex conformation by the alkaloid analogs compared to the duplex. The binding was entropy-driven in each case and the entropy contribution to free energy increased as the length of the alkyl side chain increased. The analogs exhibited stronger binding affinity to the triple helical structure compared to the parent double helical structure.     

Absorption and fluorescence studies of the binding of the recA gene product from E. coli to single-stranded and double-stranded DNA. Ionic strength dependence

The binding of the recA gene product from E. coli to double-stranded and single-stranded nucleic acids has been investigated by following the change in melting temperature of duplex DNA and the fluorescence of single-stranded DNA or poly(dA) modified by reaction with chloroacetaldehyde. At low ionic strength, in the absence of Mg2+ ions, RecA protein binds preferentially to duplex DNA or poly(dA-dT). This leads to an increase of the DNA melting temperature. Stabilization of duplex DNA decreases when ionic strength or pH increases. In the presence of Mg2+ ions, preferential binding to single-stranded polynucleotides is observed. Precipitation occurs when duplex DNA begins to melt in the presence of RecA protein. From competition experiments, different single-stranded and double-stranded polydeoxynucleotides can be ranked according to their ability to bind RecA protein. Structural changes induced in nucleic acids upon RecA binding are discussed together with conformational changes induced in RecA protein upon magnesium binding.     

Complete disproportionation of duplex poly(dT)*poly(dA) into triplex poly(dT)*poly(dA)*poly(dT) and poly(dA) by coralyne

Coralyne is a small crescent-shaped molecule known to intercalate duplex and triplex DNA. We report that coralyne can cause the complete and irreversible disproportionation of duplex poly(dT)·poly(dA). That is, coralyne causes the strands of duplex poly(dT)·poly(dA) to repartition into equal molar equivalents of triplex poly(dT)·poly(dA)·poly(dT) and poly(dA). Poly(dT)·poly(dA) will remain as a duplex for months after the addition of coralyne, if the sample is maintained at 4°C. However, disproportionation readily occurs upon heating above 35°C and is not reversed by subsequent cooling. A titration of poly(dT)·poly(dA) with coralyne reveals that disproportionation is favored by as little as one molar equivalent of coralyne per eight base pairs of initial duplex. We have also found that poly(dA) forms a self-structure in the presence of coralyne with a melting temperature of 47°C, for the conditions of our study. This poly(dA) self-structure binds coralyne with an affinity that is comparable with that of triplex poly(dT)·poly(dA)·poly(dT). A Job plot analysis reveals that the maximum level of poly(dA) self-structure intercalation is 0.25 coralyne molecules per adenine base. This conforms to the nearest neighbor exclusion principle for a poly(dA) duplex structure with A·A base pairs. We propose that duplex disproportionation by coralyne is promoted by both the triplex and the poly(dA) self-structure having binding constants for coralyne that are greater than that of duplex poly(dT)·poly(dA).     

Catalytic activities of synthetic octadeoxyribonucleotides as coenzymes of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and the identification of a new enzyme inhibitory site

The catalytic activity of highly purified poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase was determined at constant NAD+ concentration and varying concentrations of sDNA or synthetic octadeoxyribonucleotides of differing composition. The coenzymic activities of deoxyribonucleotides were compared in two ways: graphic presentation of the activation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in the presence of a large concentration range of deoxyribonucleotides and by calculating kD values for the deoxyribonucleotides. As determined by method i, auto-mono-ADP-ribosylation of the enzyme protein at 25 nM NAD+ was maximally activated at 1:1 octamer/enzyme molar ratios by the octadeoxyribonucleotide derived from the regulatory region of SV40 DNA (duplex C). At a 0.4:1 sDNA/enzyme ratio, sDNA was the most active coenzyme for mono-ADP-ribosylation. At 200 microM NAD+, resulting in polymer synthesis and with histones as secondary polymer acceptors, duplex C was the most active coenzyme, and the octamer containing the steroid hormone receptor binding consensus sequence of DNA was a close second, whereas sDNA exhibited an anomalous biphasic kinetics. sDNA was effective on mono-ADP-ribosylation at a concentration 150-200 -times lower than on polymer formation. When comparison of deoxyribonucleotides was based on method ii (kD values), by far the most efficiently binding coenzyme for both mono and polymer synthesis was sDNA, followed by duplex C, with (dA-dT)8 exhibiting the weakest binding. The synthetic molecule 6-amino-1,2-benzopyrone (6-aminocoumarin) competitively inhibited the coenzymic function of synthetic octadeoxyribonucleotides at constant concentration of NAD+, identifying a new inhibitory site of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase.     

Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase binding to DNA by thymidine dimer

The ability of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase to bind damaged DNA was assessed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. DNA binding domain of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARPDBD) binds to synthetic deoxyribonucleotide duplex 10-mer. However, the synthetic deoxyribonucleotide duplex containing cys-syn thymidine dimer which produces the unwinding of DNA helix structure lost its affinity to PARPDBD. It was shown that the binding of PARPDBD to the synthetic deoxyribonucleotide duplex was not affected by O6-Me-dG which causes only minor distortion of DNA helix structure. This study suggests that the stabilized DNA helix structure is important for poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase binding to DNA breaks, which are known to stimulate catalytic activity of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase.     

Requirements for synthesis of ribonucleic acid primers during lagging strand synthesis by the DNA polymerase and gene 4 protein of bacteriophage T7.

DNA polymerase and gene 4 protein of bacteriophage T7 catalyze DNA synthesis on duplex DNA templates. Synthesis is initiated at nicks in the DNA template, and this leading strand synthesis results in displacement of one of the parental strands. In the presence of ribonucleoside 5'-triphosphates the gene 4 protein catalyzes the synthesis of oligoribonucleotide primers on the displaced single strand, and their extension by T7 dna polymerase accounts for lagging strand synthesis. Since all the oligoribonucleotide primers bear adenosine 5'-triphosphate residues at their 5' termini, [gamma 32P]ATP is incorporated specifically into the product molecule, thus providing a rapid and sensitive assay for the synthesis of the RNA primers. Both primer synthesis and DNA synthesis are stimulated 3- to 5-fold by the presence of either Escherichia coli or T7 helix-destabilizing protein (DNA binding protein). ATP and CTP together fully satisfy the requirement for rNTPs and provide maximum synthesis of primers and DNA. Provided that T7 DNA polymerase is present, RNA-primed DNA synthesis occurs on either duplex or single-stranded DNA templates and to equal extents on either strand of T7 DNA. No primer-directed DNA synthesis occurs on poly(dT) or poly(dG) templates, indicating that synthesis of primers is template-directed.     

Controlling nucleic acid secondary structure by intercalation: effects of DNA strand length on coralyne-driven duplex disproportionation

Small molecules that intercalate in DNA and RNA are powerful agents for controlling nucleic acid structural transitions. We recently demonstrated that coralyne, a small crescent-shaped molecule, can cause the complete and irreversible disproportionation of duplex poly(dA)·poly(dT) into triplex poly(dA)·poly(dT)·poly(dT) and a poly(dA) self- structure. Both DNA secondary structures that result from duplex disproportionation are stabilized by coralyne intercalation. In the present study, we show that the kinetics and thermodynamics of coralyne-driven duplex disproportionation strongly depend on oligonucleotide length. For example, disproportionation of duplex (dA)₁₆·(dT)₁₆ by coralyne reverts over the course of hours if the sample is maintained at 4°C. Coralyne-disproportioned (dA)₃₂· (dT)₃₂, on the other hand, only partially reverts to the duplex state over the course of days at the same temperature. Furthermore, the equilibrium state of a (dA)₁₆·(dT)₁₆ sample in the presence of coralyne at room temperature contains three different secondary structures [i.e. duplex, triplex and the (dA)₁₆ self-structure]. Even the well-studied process of triplex stabilization by coralyne binding is found to be a length-dependent phenomenon and more complicated than previously appreciated. Together these observations indicate that at least one secondary structure in our nucleic acid system [i.e. duplex, triplex or (dA)_n self-structure] binds coralyne in a length-dependent manner.     

(dA·dT)-dependent inactivation of the DNA template properties by interaction with netropsin and distamycin A

The inhibitory effect of the polypeptide antibiotics netropsin and distamycin A on DNA dependent nucleic acid synthesis has been shown to be related to the base composition of the template DNA. A number of natural DNA's of quite different dA·dT content as well as poly (dI-dC)·poly (dI-dC), poly (dA-dT)·poly (dA-dT), poly (dA) · poly (dT) and poly (dG)·poly(dC) has been studied as templates in DNA and in part in RNA polymerase reaction. The highest binding efficiency of netropsin existing for (dA·dT)-containing DNA polymers and the less pronounced interaction with the (dI·dC)-containing polymer shown by the melting and CD spectral behaviour of the complexes are entirely reflected in the template inactivation. The same is evident for distamycin A. However, in contrast to netropsin the antibiotic distamycin A exhibits some binding tendency to poly (dG)·poly (dC). Binding effects of a netropsin derivative to DNA and (dA·dT)-containing polymers suggest the importance of hydrogen bonds of the peptide groups in the complex formation.     

Characterization of ciprofloxacin binding to the linear single- and double-stranded DNA

The binding of ciprofloxacin to natural and synthetic polymeric DNAs was investigated at different solvent conditions using a combination of spectroscopic and hydrodynamic techniques. In 10 mM cacodylate buffer (pH 7.0) containing 108.6 mM Na(+), no sequence preferences in the interaction of ciprofloxacin with DNA was detected, while in 2 mM cacodylate buffer (pH 7.0) containing only 1.7 mM Na(+), a significant binding of ciprofloxacin to natural and synthetic linear double-stranded DNA was observed. At low ionic strength of solution, ciprofloxacin binding to DNA duplex containing alternating AT base pairs is accompanied by the largest enhancement in thermal stability (e.g. DeltaT(m) approximately 10 degrees C for poly[d(AT)].poly[d(AT)]), and the most pronounced red shift in the position of the maximum of the fluorescence emission spectrum (lambda(max)). Similar red shift in the position of lambda(max) is also observed for ciprofloxacin binding to dodecameric duplex containing five successive alternating AT base pairs in the row. On the other hand, ciprofloxacin binding to poly[d(GC)].poly[d(GC)], calf thymus DNA and dodecameric duplex containing a mixed sequence is accompanied by the largest fluorescence intensity quenching. Addition of NaCl does not completely displace ciprofloxacin bound to DNA, indicating the binding is not entirely electrostatic in origin. The intrinsic viscosity data suggest some degree of ciprofloxacin intercalation into duplex.     

Binding of CC-1065 to poly- and oligonucleotides

The binding of the antitumor agent CC-1065 to a variety of poly- and oligonucleotides was studied by electronic absorption, CD, and resistance to removal by Sephadex column chromatography. Competitive binding experiments between CC-1065 and netropsin were carried out with calf-thymus DNA, poly(dI-dC) · poly(dI-dC), poly(dI) · poly(dC), poly(rA) · poly(dT), poly(dA- dC) · poly(dG-dT), and poly(dA) · 2poly(dT). CC-1065 binds to polynucleotides by three mechanisms. In the first, CC-1065 binds only weakly, as judged by the induction of zero or very weak CD spectra and low resistance to extraction of drug from the polynucleotide by Sephadex chromatography. In the second and third mechanisms, CC-1065 binds strongly, as judged by the induction of two distinct, intense CD spectra and high resistance to extraction of drug from the polynucleotide, by Sephadex chromatography in both cases. The species bound by the second mechanism converts to that bound by the third mechanism with varying kinetics, which depend both on the base-pair sequence and composition of the polynucleotide. Competitive binding experiments with netropsin show that CC-1065 binds strongly in the minor groove of DNA by the second and third mechanisms of binding. Netropsin can displace CC-1065 that is bound by the second mechanism but not that bound by the third mechanism. CC-1065 binds preferentially to B-form duplex DNA and weakly (by the first binding mechanism) or not at all to RNA, DNA, and RNA–DNA polynucleotides which adopt the A-form conformation or to single-strand DNA. This correlation of strong binding of CC-1065 to B-form duplex DNA is consistent with x-ray data, which suggest an anomalous structure for poly(dI) · poly(rC), as compared with poly(rI) · poly(dC) (A-form) and poly(dI) · poly(dC) (B-form). The binding data indicate that poly(rA) · poly(dU) takes the B-form secondary structure like poly(rA) · poly(dT). Triple-stranded poly(dA) · 2poly(dT) and poly(dA) · 2poly(dU), which are considered to adopt the A-form conformation, bind CC-1065 strongly. Netropsin, which also shows a binding preference for B-form polynucleotides, also binds to poly(dA) · 2poly(dT) and occupies the same binding site as CC-1065. These binding studies are consistent with results of x-ray studies, which suggest that A-form triplex DNA retains some structural features of B-form DNA that are not present in A-form duplex DNA; i.e., the axial rise per nucleotide and the base tilt. Triple-stranded poly(dA) · 2poly(rU) does not bind CC-1065 strongly but has nearly the same conformation as poly(dA) · 2poly(dT) based on x-ray analysis. This suggests that the 2′-OH group of the poly(rU) strands interferes with CC-1065 binding to this polynucleotide. The same type of interference may occur for other RNA and DNA–RNA polynucleotides that bind CC-1065 weakly.     

The isolation of duplex DNA fragments containing (dG.dC) clusters by chromatography on poly(rC)-Sephadex.

Duplex DNA containing oligo(dG.dC)-rich clusters can be isolated by specific binding to poly(rC)-Sephadex. This binding, probably mediated by the formation of an oligo(dG.dC)rC+ triple helix, is optimal at pH 5 in 50% formamide, 2 M LiCl; the bound DNA is recovered by elution at pH 7.5. Using this method we find that the viral DNAs PM2, lambda and SV40 contain at least 1, 1 and 2 sites for binding to poly(rC)-Sephadex, respectively. These binding sites have been mapped in the case of SV40; the binding sites can in turn be used for physical mapping studies of DNAs containing (dG.dC) clusters. Inspection of the sequence of the bound fragments of SV40 DNA shows that a (dG.dC)6-7 tract is required for the binding of duplex DNA to poly(rC)-Sephadex. Although about 60% of rabbit DNA cleaved with restriction endonuclease KpnI binds to poly(rC)-Sephadex, no binding is observed for the 5.1 kb DNA fragment generated by KpnI digestion, which contains the rabbit beta-globin gene. This indicates that oligo(dG.dC) clusters are not found close to the rabbit beta-globin gene.     

Molecular recognition of a DNA:RNA hybrid: sub-nanomolar binding by a neomycin-methidium conjugate

A novel neomycin–methidium conjugate was synthesized. The covalent linkage of the aminoglycoside to an intercalator, a derivative of ethidium bromide, results in a new conjugate capable of selective recognition of the DNA:RNA hybrid duplex. Spectroscopic methods: UV, CD, fluorescence, and calorimetric techniques: DSC and ITC were used to characterize the sub-nanomolar binding displayed by the conjugate for the DNA:RNA hybrid duplex, poly(dA):poly(rU).     

Sequence and structural selectivity of nucleic acid binding ligands

The sequence and structural selectivity of 15 different DNA binding agents was explored using a novel, thermodynamically rigorous, competition dialysis procedure. In the competition dialysis method, 13 different nucleic acid structures were dialyzed against a common ligand solution. More ligand accumulated in the dialysis tube containing the structural form with the highest ligand binding affinity. DNA structural forms included in the assay ranged from single-stranded forms, through a variety of duplex forms, to multistranded triplex and tetraplex forms. Left-handed Z-DNA, RNA, and a DNA-RNA hybrid were also represented. Standard intercalators (ethidium, daunorubicin, and actinomycin D) served as control compounds and were found to show structural binding preferences fully consistent with their previously published behavior. Standard groove binding agents (DAPI, distamycin, and netropsin) showed a strong preference for AT-rich duplex DNA forms, along with apparently strong binding to the poly(dA)-[poly(dT)](2) triplex. Thermal denaturation studies revealed the apparent triplex binding to be complex, and perhaps to result from displacement of the third strand. Putative triplex (BePI, coralyne, and berberine) and tetraplex [H(2)TmPyP, 5,10,15, 20-tetrakis[4-(trimethylammonio)phenyl]-21H,23H-porphine, and N-methyl mesoporphyrin IX] selective agents showed in many cases less dramatic binding selectivity than anticipated from published reports that compared their binding to only a few structural forms. Coralyne was found to bind strongly to single-stranded poly(dA), a novel and previously unreported interaction. Finally, three compounds (berenil, chromomycin A, and pyrenemethylamine) whose structural preferences are largely unknown were examined. Pyrenemethylamine exhibited an unexpected and unprecedented preference for duplex poly(dAdT).     

Counterion association with native and denatured nucleic acids: an experimental approach

The melting temperature of the poly(dA) . poly(dT) double helix is exquisitely sensitive to salt concentration, and the helix-to-coil transition is sharp. Modern calorimetric instrumentation allows this transition to be detected and characterized with high precision at extremely low duplex concentrations. We have taken advantage of these properties to show that this duplex can be used as a sensitive probe to detect and to characterize the influence of other solutes on solution properties. We demonstrate how the temperature associated with poly(dA) . poly(dT) melting can be used to define the change in bulk solution cation concentration imparted by the presence of other duplex and triplex solutes, in both their native and denatured states. We use this information to critically evaluate features of counterion condensation theory, as well as to illustrate "crosstalk" between different, non-contacting solute molecules. Specifically, we probe the melting of a synthetic homopolymer, poly(dA) . poly(dT), in the presence of excess genomic salmon sperm DNA, or in the presence of one of two synthetic RNA polymers (the poly(rA) . poly(rU) duplex or the poly(rU) . poly(rA) . poly(rU) triplex). We find that these additions cause a shift in the melting temperature of poly(dA) . poly(dT), which is proportional to the concentration of the added polymer and dependent on its conformational state (B versus A, native versus denatured, and triplex versus duplex). To a first approximation, the magnitude of the observed tm shift does not depend significantly on whether the added polymer is RNA or DNA, but it does depend on the number of strands making up the helix of the added polymer. We ascribe the observed changes in melting temperature of poly(dA) . poly(dT) to the increase in ionic strength of the bulk solution brought about by the presence of the added nucleic acid and its associated counterions. We refer to this communication between non-contacting biopolymers in solution as solvent-mediated crosstalk. By comparison with a known standard curve of tm versus log[Na+] for poly(dA) . poly(dT), we estimate the magnitude of the apparent change in ionic strength resulting from the presence of the bulk nucleic acid, and we compare these results with predictions from theory. We find that current theoretical considerations correctly predict the direction of the t(m) shift (the melting temperature increases), while overestimating its magnitude. Specifically, we observe an apparent increase in ionic strength equal to 5% of the concentration of the added duplex DNA or RNA (in mol phosphate), and an additional apparent increase of about 9.5 % of the nucleic acid concentration (mol phosphate) upon denaturation of the added DNA or RNA, yielding a total apparent increase of 14.5 %. For the poly(rU) . poly(rA) . poly(rU) triplex, the total apparent increase in ionic strength corresponds to about 13.6% of the amount of added triplex (moles phosphate). The effect we observe is due to coupled equilibria between the solute molecules mediated by modulations in cation concentration induced by the presence and/or the transition of one of the solute molecules. We note that our results are general, so one can use a different solute probe sensitive to proton binding to characterize subtle changes in solution pH induced by the presence of another solute in solution. We discuss some of the broader implications of these measurements/results in terms of nucleic acid melting in multicomponent systems, in terms of probing counterion environments, and in terms of potential regulatory mechanisms.     

Binding of ethidium bromide to a DNA triple helix. Evidence for intercalation

The interaction of ethidium, a DNA intercalator, with the poly(dA).poly(dT) duplex and the poly (dA).2poly(dT) triplex has been investigated by a variety of spectrophotometric and hydrodynamic techniques. The fluorescence of ethidium is increased when either the duplex or triplex form is present. Binding constants, determined from absorbance measurements, indicate that binding to the triple helical form is substantially stronger than to the duplex, with a larger binding site size (2.8 base triplets compared to 2.4 base pairs). Furthermore, while binding to poly(dA).poly(dT) shows strong positive cooperativity, binding to the triplex is noncooperative. Thermal denaturation experiments demonstrate that ethidium stabilizes the triple helix. Binding to either form induces a weak circular dichroism band in the visible wavelength region, while in the region around 310 nm, there is a band that is strongly dependent on the degree of saturation of the duplex, and which is positive for the duplex but negative for the triplex. Both fluorescence energy transfer and quenching studies provide evidence of intercalation of ethidium in both duplex and triplex complexes. Binding of ethidium leads to an initial decrease in viscosity for both the duplex and triplex structures, followed by an increase, which is greater for the duplex. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that ethidium binds to the poly (dA).2poly(dT) triple helix via an intercalative mechanism.     

Monoclonal antibodies specific for poly(dG) X poly(dC) and poly(dG) X poly(dm5C)

Most duplex DNAs that are in the "B" conformation are not immunogenic. One important exception is poly(dG) X poly(dC), which produces a good immune response even though, by many criteria, it adopts a conventional right-handed helix. In order to investigate what features are being recognized, monoclonal antibodies were prepared against poly(dG) X poly(dC) and the related polymer poly(dG) X poly(dm5C). Jel 72, which is an immunoglobulin G, binds only to poly(dG) X poly(dC), while Jel 68, which is an immunoglobulin M, binds approximately 10-fold more strongly to poly(dG) X poly(dm5C) than to poly(dG) X poly(dC). For both antibodies, no significant interaction could be detected with any other synthetic DNA duplexes including poly[d(Gm5C)] X poly[d(Gm5C)] in both the "B" and "Z" forms, poly[d(Tm5Cm5C)] X poly[d(GGA)], and poly[d(TCC)] X poly[d(GGA)], poly(dI) X poly(dC), or poly(dI) X poly(dm5C). The binding to poly(dG) X poly(dC) was inhibited by ethidium and by disruption of the DNA duplex, confirming that the antibodies were not recognizing single-stranded or multistranded structures. Furthermore, Jel 68 binds significantly to phage XP-12 DNA, which contains only m5C residues and will precipitate this DNA in the absence of a second antibody. The results suggest that (dG)n X (dm5C)n sequences in natural DNA exist in recognizably distinct conformations.     

Mammalian DNA methyltransferases prefer poly(dI-dC) as substrate

The synthetic duplex DNA, poly(dI-dC).poly(dI-dC), is methylated in vitro by human or murine DNA methyltransferases at 20-100 times the rate of other nonmethylated DNAs. Preparation of the hemimethylated derivative, poly(dI-dMeC).poly(dI-dC), of this polymer increases its effectiveness as a substrate by 2-fold, making it 4-10 times more effective as a substrate for mammalian DNA methyltransferases than any other hemimethylated DNA so far reported. However, the apparent slower rate of de novo methylation of poly(dI-dC).poly(dI-dC) as compared to the hemimethylated derivative is due to substrate inhibition, unique to the unmethylated polymer, as the rates of de novo and maintenance methylation are identical at low substrate concentrations.     

Interaction of the nonintercalative antitumour drugs SN-6999 and SN-18071 with DNA: influence of ligand structure on the binding specificity

Binding to DNA's of the non-intercalative ligands SN-6999 and SN-18071 has been studied by means of circular dichroism, UV absorption, thermal melting and for SN-6999 by viscosity measurements. Both antitumour drugs show a preference for dA.dT rich DNA's, but the base pair selectivity of SN-18071 is lower as indicated by some affinity to dG.dC containing duplex DNA. The dA.dT base pair specificity of SN-6999 is comparable to that of netropsin. It forms very stable complexes with dA.dT containing duplex DNA and competes with netropsin binding on DNA. The ligands SN-18071 and pentamidine are totally released from their complexes with poly(dA-dT).poly(dA-dT) by competitive netropsin binding. The results demonstrate that hydrogen bonding capacity of the ligand in addition to other factors strongly contribute to the base sequence specificity in the recognition process of the ligand with DNA. A binding model of SN-6999 with five dA.dT pairs in the minor groove of B-DNA is suggested.     

Bifunctional intercalation and sequence specificity in the binding of quinomycin and triostin antibiotics to deoxyribonucleic acid.

Quinomycin C, triostin A and triostin C are peptide antibiotics of the quinoxaline family, of which echinomycin (quinomycin A) is also a member. They all remove and reverse the supercoiling of closed circular duplex DNA from bacteriophage PM2 in the fashion characteristic of intercalating drugs, and the unwinding angle at I 0.01 is, in all cases, almost twice that of ethidium. Thus, as with echinomycin, they can be characterized as bifunctional intercalating agents. For the triostins this conclusion has been confirmed by measurements of changes in the viscosity of sonicated rod-like DNA fragments; the helix extension was found to be almost double that expected for a simple monofunctional intercalation process. For triostin A, further evidence for bifunctionality was derived from the cross-over point of binding isotherms to nicked circular and closed circular bacteriophage-PM2DNA. Binding curves for the interaction of quinomycin C and triostin A with a variety of synthetic and naturally occurring nucleic acids were determined by solvent-partition analysis, but triostin C was too insoluble in aqueous solution to make this method applicable. For quinomycin C the highest binding constant was found with Micrococcus lysodeikticus DNA, and its pattern of specificity among natural DNA species was broadly similar to that of echinomycin, although the binding constants were 2--6 times as large. For triostin A the highest binding constant was again found for M. lysodeikticus DNA, but the specificity pattern was quite different from that of the quinomycins. In particular, triostin A bound better to poly(dA-dT) than to the poly(dG-dC) whereas this order was reversed for quinomycin C. There was also evidence that the binding to poly(dA-dT) might be co-operative in nature. No significant interaction could be detected with poly(dA).poly(dT) or with RNA from Escherichia coli. Poly(dG).poly(dC) gave variable results, depending on the source of the polymer. The different patterns of specificity displayed by the quinomycins and triostins are tentatively ascribed to differences in their conformations in solution.     

Variations in duplex DNA conformation detected by the binding of monoclonal autoimmune antibodies.

Four monoclonal antibodies (Jel 229, 239, 241, 242) which bound to duplex DNA were prepared from two autoimmune female NZB/NZW mice. Their binding to various nucleic acids was investigated by a competitive solid phase radioimmune assay which allows the estimation of relative binding constants. None of the antibodies showed any consistent variation of binding constant with base composition and thus they must recognize features of the DNA backbone. Jel 241 binds across the major groove but the interaction with poly(pyrimidine) X poly(purine) DNAs was barely detectable. This antibody appears to recognize the "alternating-B" conformation which is promoted by methylation of pyrimidines in alternating sequences. The other three antibodies bind in the minor groove. In particular, for Jel 229 the preferred antigen was poly(dG) X poly(dC) with only weak binding to poly(dA) X poly(dT). This suggests a requirement for a wide minor groove. Thus autoimmune antibodies provide examples of "analogue" recognition and can be used to detect structural variations in the grooves of duplex DNA.