脱氧胆酸钠在副溶血性弧菌死活细胞叠氮溴乙锭PCR鉴别中的应用

[目的]通过将表面活性剂脱氧胆酸钠(Sodium deoxycholate,SD)与叠氮溴乙锭(Ethidium bromide monoazide,EMA)-PCR反应体系相结合,建立SD-EMA-PCR鉴别副溶血性弧菌死活细胞的检测方法.[方法]依次对加入检测体系中的脱氧胆酸钠最适浓度、EMA区分死活细胞DNA的浓度范围、EMA激活光解最佳曝光时间进行优化;确定SD-EMA-PCR方法检测副溶血性弧菌死活细胞混合体系中活细胞的最低检出限.[结果]当脱氧胆酸钠浓度≤0.5 g/L,EMA的浓度为3.2-34.0 mg/L,曝光时间为25 min时,SD-EMA-PCR检测体系仅对死细胞DNA扩增产生抑制作用.SD-EMA-PCR检测活菌细胞的最低检出限为10 CFU/mL.[结论]死活细胞混合体系的SD-EMA-PCR检测证明该方法能够明显降低EMA-PCR漏检的死菌对检测结果造成的影响,为完善食源性致病菌检测中死活菌细胞鉴别方法提供了一种有效途径.     

副溶血弧菌EMA-PCR检测技术的建立

PCR技术被广泛应用于副溶血弧菌的检测中, 但传统的PCR技术无法区分样品中的死细菌与活细菌, 往往使检测结果出现较高的假阳性。因此, 将叠氮溴乙锭(Ethidium monoazide bromide, EMA)与PCR技术结合, 建立一种快速、准确的副溶血弧菌检测方法。以dnaJ基因为检测副溶血弧菌的靶基因, 分别用副溶血弧菌的纯培养细胞及其基因组DNA作模板进行PCR检测, 灵敏度分别为2.5×104 CFU/mL和6×102 fg/μL。在检测样品前处理过程中加入EMA, 当EMA的浓度小于5 mg/L时, EMA对活菌靶基因的扩增没有明显的抑制; 而终浓度为2 mg/L的EMA, 能有效抑制1×108 CFU/mL副溶血弧菌死菌的扩增。活菌和死菌混合体系的PCR结果表明, EMA-PCR能有效降低副溶血弧菌检测过程中的假阳性。     

副溶血弧菌LAMP检测方法的建立

副溶血弧菌(Vibrio parahaemolyticus)是一种能引起食源性疾病的重要病原菌。首次将一种新颖的核酸扩增技术-环介导等温扩增技术（Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification, LAMP）应用于副溶血弧菌的快速检测。针对副溶血弧菌不耐热溶血毒素基因（tlh）设计四条特异性引物（两条内引物和两条外引物）进行LAMP扩增,对扩增反应进行优化,最佳反应时间为60 min,反应温度为60 ℃。对12种细菌共28株菌进行LAMP扩增,仅14株副溶血弧菌得到阳性扩增结果,证明引物具有很高的特异性。副溶血弧菌基因组DNA和纯培养物的检测灵敏度分别约为90 fg和24 cfu/mL。对模拟食品样品进行直接检测,检测限为89 cfu/g。结果表明,该方法检测副溶血弧菌特异性强、灵敏度高,并且操作简便、检测成本低,1 h即可完成,有望发展成为快速检测副溶血弧菌的有效手段。     

沙门菌、志贺菌、副溶血性弧菌多重PCR检测方法的研究

建立快速检测沙门菌、志贺菌和副溶血性弧菌的多重PCR方法[1-4].根据沙门菌hilA基因、志贺菌ipaH基因及副溶血性弧菌TDH基因设计特异性PCR引物[5-6],被检样品经4 h振荡培养后金属浴裂解制备DNA模板,使用全自动毛细管电泳核酸检测系统分析PCR扩增产物.在580、423和245 bp处分别出现预期的特异性DNA条带,且无非特异扩增条带出现.敏感性试验显示沙门菌在模拟标本中的检测灵敏度为101-2cfu/mL、志贺菌为101cfu/mL、副溶血性弧菌为102cfu/mL.该方法操作方便、分析时间短、特异性和灵敏度高,可用于公共卫生突发事件食源性病原菌的快速检测.     

多重PCR检测无公害畜禽肉和水产品中4种致病菌

建立无公害畜禽肉和水产品中肠出血性大肠杆菌(EHEC)、沙门氏菌、副溶血性弧菌(VP)和单核细胞增生性李斯特氏菌(LM)的多重PCR检测方法,为这些致病菌的快速诊断提供实验依据。选择分别针对EHEC溶血素基因hlyAB、副溶血性弧菌属保守序列toxR基因、沙门氏菌侵袭基因invA和LM的iap基因特异的4对引物,先分别进行单重PCR扩增,再同时加入4对引物进行多重PCR扩增,扩增产物经测序验证。建立的多重PCR方法可简便、快速、灵敏地实现对EHEC、LM、沙门氏菌和VP的同时检测,在畜禽肉和水产品中的检测灵敏度达到10^3cfu/mL。     

添加有扩增内标的副溶血弧菌PCR检测方法

【目的】发掘副溶血弧菌特异性更强的检测靶点,并人工构建扩增内标,建立可以有效避免假阴性的新PCR检测体系。【方法】利用生物信息学方法,从副溶血弧菌(Vibrio parahaemolyticus)基因组DNA中发掘特异性很高的序列,并设计相应的特异性引物,人工构建扩增内标,建立PCR检测体系。【结果】本研究发掘得到的序列vp1332特异性很强,经检索,该序列是编码ABC转运子接合蛋白组分的基因片段,根据此序列设计一对特异检测引物(vp1332L/vp1332R),同时,构建了扩增内标,并建立了PCR检测体系。利用该体系对296株副溶血弧菌和33株非副溶血弧菌进行检测,结果显示,所有以副溶血弧菌为模板的PCR反应均可扩增到一条343bp的特异片段,而模板来源于非副溶血弧菌的则只能扩增到一条499bp的扩增内标片段。灵敏度实验表明,该PCR反应体系的检测灵敏度为1.6×102cfu/mL。人工污染实验表明,起始染菌量为1.24cfu/25g样品时经8h增菌,即可检测到副溶血弧菌。实际样品检测结果也证实该方法的有效性。【结论】本研究建立的PCR反应体系能特异地检测副溶血弧菌,并可有效地排除假阴性,提高检测准确率。     

添加有扩增内标的副溶血弧菌PCR检测方法的建立

摘要：【目的】发掘副溶血弧菌特异性更强的检测靶点,并人工构建扩增内标,建立可以有效避免假阴性的新PCR检测体系。【方法】利用生物信息学方法,从副溶血弧菌（Vibrio parahaemolyticus）基因组DNA中发掘特异性很高的序列,并设计相应的特异性引物,人工构建扩增内标,建立PCR检测体系。【结果】本研究发掘得到的序列vp1332特异性很强,经检索,该序列是编码ABC转运子接合蛋白组分的基因片段,根据此序列设计一对特异检测引物（vp1332L/vp1332R）,同时,构建了扩增内标,并建立了PCR检测体系。利用该体系对296株副溶血弧菌和33株非副溶血弧菌进行检测,结果显示,所有以副溶血弧菌为模板的PCR反应均可扩增到一条343 bp的特异片段,而模板来源于非副溶血弧菌的则只能扩增到一条499 bp的扩增内标片段。灵敏度实验表明,该PCR反应体系的检测灵敏度为1.6×102 cfu/mL。人工污染实验表明,起始染菌量为1.24 cfu/25 g样品时经8 h增菌,即可检测到副溶血弧菌。实际样品检测结果也证实该方法的有效性。【结论】本研究建立的PCR反应体系能特异地检测副溶血弧菌,并可有效地排除假阴性,提高检测准确率。     

水产品中创伤弧菌和副溶血弧菌双重PCR检测方法的建立

目的 建立一种同步检测创伤弧菌和副溶血弧菌的双重PCR方法。方法 选择副溶血弧菌tlh基因和创伤弧菌vvhA基因作为靶序列各设计一对引物。用合成的引物对副溶血弧菌和创伤弧菌进行双重PCR扩增,确定特异性和最低检出限。然后用此方法对53株副溶血弧菌和7株创伤弧菌进行检测。结果 确定了双重PCR检测创伤弧菌和副溶血弧菌的最优反应条件,其中退火温度为60 ℃,方法具有较好的特异性。对副溶血弧菌的最低限为1.0×102 CFU/mL,创伤弧菌最低限为4.2×104 CFU/mL。双重PCR对分离株检测符合率达100%。结论 建立的双重PCR方法简便、快速、特异性好,可同时检测副溶血弧菌和创伤弧菌,为水产品中病原菌的基层检测提供解决方案。     

低温寡营养条件下副溶血弧菌形成活的非可培养状态及其复苏研究

为研究在低温寡营养条件下副溶血弧菌(Vibrio parahaemolyticus)能否进入活的非可培养状态(VBNC),将浓度为1×1010CFU/mL的副溶血弧菌HW799在陈海水中4℃保存,每隔5天取样分别用吖啶橙染色荧光显微镜直接计数法(AODC)、活菌直接计数法(DVC)和涂布平板法(PC)测定细菌总数、活细菌数和可培养细菌数.在第30天时总细菌数基本不变,仍保持在109CFU/mL,活菌数为106CFU/mL,比总菌数低了约三个数量级,可培养细菌数为零,表明绝大部分副溶血弧菌HW799进入了VBNC状态;用扫描电镜、流式细胞仪对副溶血弧菌HW799活的非可培养状态、正常状态以及复苏后的细胞形态的研究表明进入VBNC状态后副溶血弧菌HW799形状变为球状,体积比正常状态明显变小,活细胞数也略有减少;采用在培养液中添加营养物质升温培养的方法,使VBNC状态的副溶血弧菌细胞在48h内复苏为可培养状态,复苏后的副溶血弧菌HW799与正常状态的细菌形态相似.     

基于EMA-qPCR的茄科青枯菌活体检测技术的建立

【目的】利用特异性核酸染料叠氮溴乙锭(Ethidium monoazide bromide, EMA)与实时荧光定量PCR技术相结合, 建立一种能有效区分青枯菌死活细胞的检测方法。【方法】样品DNA制备前经EMA渗透预处理, 再进行实时荧光定量PCR特异扩增菌体DNA。【结果】终浓度为2.0 mg/L的EMA能有效排除1.0×107 CFU/mL灭活青枯菌细胞DNA的扩增, 对活细胞和不可培养状态(Viable but non-culturable, VBNC)活菌的DNA扩增均没有影响。当每个定量PCR反应体系中的活细胞在5.0×100?5.0×104 CFU范围内时, 扩增Ct值与定量PCR反应体系中活细胞CFU对数值呈良好的负相关性(R2=0.992 5)。比较EMA-qPCR法和平板计数法对经过不同温度短期保存的青枯菌检测结果发现, 待检样品可在24 °C与4 °C冷藏条件下短期保存。【结论】本研究建立的EMA-qPCR方法能有效检测青枯菌VBNC细胞和有效区分死活菌, 避免或减少青枯菌PCR检测的假阳性和假阴性。     

Use of ethidium bromide monoazide for quantification of viable and dead mixed bacterial flora from fish fillets by polymerase chain reaction

Ethidium bromide monoazide (EMA) was utilized to selectively allow conventional PCR amplification of target DNA from viable but not dead cells from a broth culture of bacterial mixed flora derived from cod fillets. The universal primers designated DG74 and RW01 that amplify a 370-bp sequence of a highly conserved region of all eubacterial 16S rDNA were used for the PCR. The use of 10 microg/ml or less of EMA did not inhibit the PCR amplification of DNA derived from viable bacteria. The minimum amount of EMA to completely inhibit the PCR amplification of DNA derived from dead bacterial cells was 0.8 microg/ml. Amplification of target DNA from only viable cells in a suspension with dead cells was selectively accomplished by first treating the cells with 1 microg/ml of EMA. A standard curve was generated relating the intensity of fluorescence of DNA bands to the log of CFU of mixed bacterial cultures for rapidly assessing the number of genomic targets per PCR derived from the number of CFU. A linear range of DNA amplification was exhibited from 1 x 10(2) to 1 x 10(5) genomic targets per PCR. The viable/dead cell discrimination with the EMA-PCR method was evaluated by comparison with plate counts following freezing and thawing. Thawing frozen cell suspensions initially containing 1 x 10(5) CFU/ml at 4, 20, and 37 degrees C yielded a 0.8 log reduction in the number of viable cells determined by both plate counts and EMA-PCR. In contrast, thawing for 5 min at 70 degrees C resulted in a 5 log reduction in CFU derived from plate counts (no CFU detected) whereas the EMA-PCR procedure resulted in only a 2.8 log reduction in genomic targets, possibly reflecting greater damage to enzymes or ribosomes at 70 degrees C to a minority of the mixed population compared to membrane damage.     

Discrimination of viable Vibrio vulnificus cells from dead cells in real-time PCR

Ethidium bromide monoazide (EMA) was utilized to selectively allow the real-time PCR (RT-PCR) amplification of a targeted DNA sequence in viable but not dead cells of Vibrio vulnificus. The optimized light exposure time to achieve cross-linking of DNA by the EMA in dead cells and to photolyse the free EMA in solution was at least 15 min. The use of 3.0 microg/ml or less of EMA did not inhibit the PCR amplification of DNA derived from viable cells of V. vulnificus. The minimum amount of EMA to completely inhibit the RT-PCR amplification of DNA derived from heat-killed cells was 2.5 microg/ml. Amplification of DNA from dead cells in a mixture with viable cells was successfully inhibited by 2.5 microg/ml of EMA, whereas the DNA from viable cells present was successfully amplified by RT-PCR.     

Selective PCR detection of viable Enterobacter sakazakii cells utilizing propidium monoazide or ethidium bromide monoazide

Aims: The detection of viable Enterobacter sakazakii cells is important due to the association of this pathogen with outbreaks of life-threatening neonatal infections. The aim of this study was to optimize a PCR-based method for selective detection of only viable Ent. sakazakii cells in the presence of dead cells, utilizing propidium monoazide (PMA) or ethidium bromide monoazide (EMA). Methods and Results: PMA or EMA was added to suspensions of viable and/or dead Ent. sakazakii cells at varying concentrations (10, 50 or 100 μg ml⁻¹) prior to DNA isolation and PCR with Ent. sakazakii-specific primers. At concentrations of 50 and 100 μg ml⁻¹, PMA completely inhibited PCR amplification from dead cells, while causing no significant inhibition of the amplification from viable cells. PMA was also effective in allowing selective PCR detection of only viable cells in mixtures of varying ratios of viable and dead cells. EMA was equally effective in preventing amplification from dead cells, however, it also inhibited DNA amplification from viable cells. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the efficiency of PMA for viable and dead differentiation of Ent. sakazakii, as well as the lack of selectivity of EMA for this purpose. Significance and Impact of the Study: PMA-PCR, in particular, will be useful for monitoring the resistance, survival strategies and stress responses of Ent. sakazakii in foods and the environment.     

Selective detection of viable Helicobacter pylori using ethidium monoazide or propidium monoazide in combination with real-time polymerase chain reaction

Because Helicobacter pylori has a role in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer, chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer disease, detection of its viable form is very important. The objective of this study was to optimize a PCR method using ethidium monoazide (EMA) or propidium monoazide (PMA) for selective detection of viable H. pylori cells in mixed samples of viable and dead bacteria. Before conducting the real-time PCR using SodB primers of H. pylori, EMA or PMA was added to suspensions of viable and/or dead H. pylori cells at concentrations between 1 and 100 μM. PMA at a concentration of 50 μM induced the highest DNA loss in dead cells with little loss of genomic DNA in viable cells. In addition, selective detection of viable cells in the mixtures of viable and dead cells at various ratios was possible with the combined use of PMA and real-time PCR. In contrast, EMA penetrated the membranes of both viable and dead cells and induced degradation of their genomic DNA. The findings of this study suggest that PMA, but not EMA, can be used effectively to differentiate viable H. pylori from its dead form.     

Use of ethidium bromide monoazide for quantification of viable and dead mixed bacterial flora from fish fillets by polymerase chain reaction

Ethidium bromide monoazide (EMA) was utilized to selectively allow conventional PCR amplification of target DNA from viable but not dead cells from a broth culture of bacterial mixed flora derived from cod fillets. The universal primers designated DG74 and RW01 that amplify a 370-bp sequence of a highly conserved region of all eubacterial 16S rDNA were used for the PCR. The use of 10 μg/ml or less of EMA did not inhibit the PCR amplification of DNA derived from viable bacteria. The minimum amount of EMA to completely inhibit the PCR amplification of DNA derived from dead bacterial cells was 0.8 μg/ml. Amplification of target DNA from only viable cells in a suspension with dead cells was selectively accomplished by first treating the cells with 1 μg/ml of EMA. A standard curve was generated relating the intensity of fluorescence of DNA bands to the log of CFU of mixed bacterial cultures for rapidly assessing the number of genomic targets per PCR derived from the number of CFU. A linear range of DNA amplification was exhibited from 1 × 10² to 1 × 10⁵ genomic targets per PCR. The viable/dead cell discrimination with the EMA-PCR method was evaluated by comparison with plate counts following freezing and thawing. Thawing frozen cell suspensions initially containing 1 × 10⁵ CFU/ml at 4, 20, and 37 °C yielded a 0.8 log reduction in the number of viable cells determined by both plate counts and EMA-PCR. In contrast, thawing for 5 min at 70 °C resulted in a 5 log reduction in CFU derived from plate counts (no CFU detected) whereas the EMA-PCR procedure resulted in only a 2.8 log reduction in genomic targets, possibly reflecting greater damage to enzymes or ribosomes at 70 °C to a minority of the mixed population compared to membrane damage.     

Detection of viable Escherichia coli O157:H7 by ethidium monoazide real-time PCR

Aims: The aim of this study was to develop and optimize a novel method that combines ethidium bromide monoazide (EMA) staining with real‐time PCR for the detection of viable Escherichia  coli O157:H7 in ground beef. EMA can penetrate dead cells and bind to intracellular DNA, preventing its amplification via PCR. Methods and Results: Samples were stained with EMA for 5 min, iced for 1 min and exposed to bright visible light for 10 min prior to DNA extraction, to allow EMA binding of the DNA from dead cells. DNA was then extracted and amplified by TaqMan^® real‐time PCR to detect only viable E. coli O157:H7 cells. The primers and TaqMan^® probe used in this study target the uidA gene in E. coli O157:H7. An internal amplification control (IAC), consisting of 0·25 pg of plasmid pUC19, was added in each reaction to prevent the occurrence of false‐negative results. Results showed a reproducible application of this technique to detect viable cells in both broth culture and ground beef. EMA, at a final concentration of 10 μg ml^?1, was demonstrated to effectively bind DNA from 10⁸ CFU ml^?1 dead cells, and the optimized method could detect as low as 10⁴ CFU g^?1 of viable E. coli O157:H7 cells in ground beef without interference from 10⁸ CFU g^?1 of dead cells. Conclusions: EMA real‐time PCR with IAC can effectively separate dead cells from viable E. coli O157:H7 and prevent amplification of DNA in the dead cells. Significance and Impact of the Study: The EMA real‐time PCR has the potential to be a highly sensitive quantitative detection technique to assess the contamination of viable E. coli O157:H7 in ground beef and other meat or food products.     

Differentiation of genes extracted from non-viable versus viable micro-organisms in environmental samples using ethidium monoazide bromide

Differentiation of DNA derived from viable or non-viable microorganisms within mixed microbial communities continues to be one of the greatest challenges in molecular studies of environmental samples. A novel method developed for microbial food pathogens is tested here on environmental samples. This technique involves the use of ethidium monoazide bromide (EMA) for the distinction of live/dead cells. In non-viable cells EMA intercalates into the DNA which prevents amplification by PCR. We adapted and evaluated the EMA technique for soil, elemental sulfur and river biofilm samples. Quantitative PCR determined that EMA suppressed 99.99% of E. coli LKI gfp+ signal in non-viable cultures and 100.00% when the cultures were added to soil samples. The same technique was also successful at suppressing DNA amplification from spiked non-viable cells in elemental sulfur samples by 100.00%, but not in three Saskatchewan River biofilms. In sub Antarctic soil, EMA-Q-PCR was used to detect the prevalence of a functional gene, amoA, and this was closely correlated to nitrification activity measurements. The ability of EMA to differentiate between viable and non-viable populations in soil was confirmed by the similarity of the 16S rRNA denaturing-gradient-gel electrophoresis DNA fingerprint of EMA treated soil and the 16S rRNA cDNA fingerprint of non-EMA treated soil. The EMA technique effectively suppressed amplification of non-viable spiked controls, closely mirrored activity assays and yielded community composition profiles similar to rRNA techniques. The use of EMA in soil effectively suppressed amplification of non-viable organism DNA, however it was not effective in biofilm samples and EMA partially inhibited amplification of viable organism DNA in elemental sulfur samples.     

Selective removal of DNA from dead cells of mixed bacterial communities by use of ethidium monoazide

The distinction between viable and dead bacterial cells poses a major challenge in microbial diagnostics. Due to the persistence of DNA in the environment after cells have lost viability, DNA-based quantification methods overestimate the number of viable cells in mixed populations or even lead to false-positive results in the absence of viable cells. On the other hand, RNA-based diagnostic methods, which circumvent this problem, are technically demanding and suffer from some drawbacks. A promising and easy-to-use alternative utilizing the DNA-intercalating dye ethidium monoazide bromide (EMA) was published recently. This chemical is known to penetrate only into "dead" cells with compromised cell membrane integrity. Subsequent photoinduced cross-linking was reported to inhibit PCR amplification of DNA from dead cells. We provide evidence here that in addition to inhibition of amplification, most of the DNA from dead cells is actually lost during the DNA extraction procedure, probably together with cell debris which goes into the pellet fraction. Exposure of bacteria to increasing stress and higher proportions of dead cells in defined populations led to increasing loss of genomic DNA. Experiments were performed using Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium as model pathogens and using real-time PCR for their quantification. Results showed that EMA treatment of mixed populations of these two species provides a valuable tool for selective removal of DNA of nonviable cells by using conventional extraction protocols. Furthermore, we provide evidence that prior to denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, EMA treatment of a mature mixed-population drinking-water biofilm containing a substantial proportion of dead cells can result in community fingerprints dramatically different from those for an untreated biofilm. The interpretation of such fingerprints can have important implications in the field of microbial ecology.