Histones H2a, H2b, H3, and H4 form a tetrameric complex in solutions of high salt.

In 2 M NaCl, histones H2b, H2a, H3, and H4 form a heterotypic tetrameric complex made up of one chain of each histone. This complex has been analyzed by hydrodynamic techniques. It is indistinguishable from histones in chromatin by its resistance to trypsin, pattern of reactivity with 125I. and ability to form specific crosslinked products after treatment with formaldehyde. It is proposed that this complex is responsible for protecting the small DNA fragments produced by exhausting nuclease digestion of nuclei and that on the average two of these complexes protect the larger 180-200 base pair unit produced by partial treatment of nuclei with nuclease.     

The structure of sub-nucleosomal particles. The octameric (H3/H4)4--125-base-pair-DNA complex

Chicken erythrocyte chromatin was depleted of histones H1, H5, H2A and H2B. The resulting (H3/H4)-containing chromatin was digested with micrococcal nuclease to yield monomer, dimer, trimer etc. units, irregularly spaced on the DNA, with even-number multimers being more prominent. Sucrose density gradient centrifugation separated monomers and dimers (7.7 S and 10.5 S). Sodium dodecyl sulphate gel electrophoresis and cross-linking indicated: the monomer contains 50-base-pair (bp), 60-bp and 70-bp DNA and the dimer 125-bp DNA; the monomer contains a tetramer and the dimer an octamer of H3 and H4. Partial association of monomer units to dimers inhibits structural studies of monomers. The internal structure of the dimer, i.e. and (H3/H4)4-125-bp-DNA particle, was studied using circular dichroism, thermal denaturation and nuclease digestion. Both micrococcal nuclease and DNase I digestion indicate that, unlike core particles, accessible sites occur in the centre of the particle and it is concluded that the (H3/H4)4-125-bp-DNA particle is not a 'pseudo-core particle' in which the 'extra' H3 and H4 replace H2A and H2B. It is proposed that the octamer particle is formed by the sliding together of two 'monomer' units, each containing the (H3/H4)2 tetramer and 70 bp of DNA. Excision of this dimer unit with micrococcal nuclease results in the loss of 10 readily digestible base pairs at each end, leaving 125 bp.     

The organization of histones and DNA in chromatin: Evidence for an arginine-rich histone kernel

We have examined the role played by various histones in the organization of the DNA of the nucleosome, using staphylococcal nuclease as a probe of DNA conformation. When this enzyme attacks chromatin, a series of fragments evenly spaced at 10 base pair intervals is generated, reflecting the histone-DNA interactions within the nucleosome structure. To determine what contribution the various histones make to DNA organization, we have studied the staphylococcal nuclease digestion patterns of complexes of DNA with purified histones.Virtually all possible combinations of homogeneous histones were reconstituted onto DNA. Exhaustive digestion of a complex containing the four histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 yields a DNA fragment pattern very similar to that of whole chromatin. The only other combinations of histones capable of inducing chromatin-like DNA organization are H2A/H2B/H4 and those mixtures containing both H3 and H4. From an examination of the kinetics of digestion of H3/H4 reconstitutes, we conclude that although the other histones have a role in DNA organization within the nucleosome, the arginine-rich histone pair, H3/H4, can organize DNA segments the length of the nucleosome core in the absence of all other histones.     

The archaeal histone-fold protein HMf organizes DNA into bona fide chromatin fibers.

BACKGROUND: The discovery of histone-like proteins in Archaea urged studies into the possible organization of archaeal genomes in chromatin. Despite recent advances, a variety of structural questions remain unanswered. RESULTS: We have used the atomic force microscope (AFM) with traditional nuclease digestion assays to compare the structure of nucleoprotein complexes reconstituted from tandemly repeated eukaryal nucleosome-positioning sequences and histone octamers, H3/H4 tetramers, and the histone-fold archaeal protein HMf. The data unequivocally show that HMf reconstitutes are indeed organized as chromatin fibers, morphologically indistinguishable from their eukaryal counterparts. The nuclease digestion patterns revealed a clear pattern of protection at regular intervals, again similar to the patterns observed with eukaryal chromatin fibers. In addition, we studied HMf reconstitutes on mononucleosome-sized DNA fragments and observed a great degree of similarity in the internal organization of these particles and those organized by H3/H4 tetramers. A difference in stability was observed at the level of mono-, di-, and triparticles between the HMf particles and canonical octamer-containing nucleosomes. CONCLUSIONS: The in vitro reconstituted HMf-nucleoprotein complexes can be considered as bona fide chromatin structures. The differences in stability at the monoparticle level should be due to structural differences between HMf and core histone H3/H4 tetramers, i.e., to the complete absence in HMf of histone tails beyond the histone fold. We speculate that the existence of core histone tails in eukaryotes may provide a greater stability to nucleosomal particles and also provide the additional ability of chromatin structure to regulate DNA function in eukaryotic cells by posttranslational histone tail modifications.     

The involvement of histone H1[0] in chromatin structure.

Micrococcal nuclease digestion and light scattering are used to compare native chromatins with various histone H1[0] contents. The experimental data show that the higher the H1[0] content, the greater the ability to form compact structures with increasing ionic strength, and the lower the DNA accessibility to micrococcal nuclease. On the contrary, reconstituted samples from H1-depleted chromatin and pure individual H1 fractions behave in such a way that samples reconstituted with pure H1 degree give rise to a looser structure, more accessible to nuclease than samples reconstituted with H1-1. This contradiction suggests that the effect of H1o on chromatin structure must originate from the interaction of this histone with other components in native chromatin among which other histone H1 subfractions are good candidates.     

Removal of histone H1 exposes linker DNA in chromatin to DNAse I

After removal of histone H1 about 40% of DNA in chromatin acquires the sensitivity of naked DNA to DNAse I. Digestion of H1-depleted chromatin with DNAse I leads to a qualitative change in the digestion pattern, generating DNA fragments of approx. 200 b.p. and multiples, similar to those obtained with micrococcal nuclease. Both effects are reversed upon reconstitution of purified H1 to H1-depleted chromatin.     

Structure of subnucleosomal particles. Tetrameric (H3/H4)2 146 base pair DNA and hexameric (H3/H4)2(H2A/H2B)1 146 base pair DNA complexes

The tetrameric (H3/H4)2 146 base pair (bp) DNA and hexameric (H3/H4)2(H2A/H2B)1 146 bp DNA subnucleosomal particles have been prepared by depletion of chicken erythrocyte core particles using 3 or 4 M urea, 250 mM sodium chloride, and a cation-exchange resin. The particles have been characterized by cross-linking and sedimentation equilibrium. The structures of the particles, particularly the tetrameric, have been studied by sedimentation velocity, low-angle neutron scattering, circular dichroism, optical melting, and nuclease digestion with DNase I, micrococcal nuclease, and exonuclease III. It is concluded that since the radius of gyration of the DNA in the tetramer particle and its maximum dimension are very close to those of the core particle, no expansion occurs on removal of all the H2A and H2B. Nuclease digestion results indicate that histones H3/H4 in the tetramer particle protect a total of 70 bp of DNA that are centrally located within the 146 bp. Within the 70 bp DNA length, the two terminal regions of 10 bp are, however, not strongly protected from digestion. The optical melting profile of both particles can be resolved into three components and is consistent with the model of histone protection of DNA proposed from nuclease digestion. The structure proposed for the tetrameric histone complex bound to DNA is that of a compact particle containing 1.75 superhelical turns of DNA, in which the H3 and H4 histone location is the same as found for the core particle in chromatin by histone/DNA cross-linking [Shick, V. V., Belyavsky, A. V., Bavykin, S. G., & Mirzabekov, A. D. (1980) J. Mol. Biol. 139, 491-517]. Optical melting of the hexamer particle shows that each (H2A/H2B)1 dimer of the core particle protects about 22 base pairs of DNA.     

Sea urchin sperm chromatin structure as probed by pancreatic DNase I: Evidence for a novel cutting periodicity

Chromatin from mature sea urchin spermatozoa is highly compacted and composed almost entirely of DNA and the five histones, although sperm H1, H2A, and H2b histones differ from those found in embryo or somatic cell nuclei. Release of acid-soluble DNA during pancreatic DNase I digestion is 20-fold slower from sperm nuclei than from embryonic nuclei. Following DNase I digestion, most sperm nuclear DNA remains at high molecular weight, although there appears to be some release of 10 base oligomer fragments. Size analysis of the higher molecular weight DNA reveals a series of fragments that indicate a cutting periodicity of approximately 500 base pairs. This pattern remains when electrophoretic separation is carried out under denaturing conditions. The 500 base pair cleavage pattern was not detected in digestions of embryonic nuclei. Nucleosomes reconstituted with fractionated core histones from sperm gave, upon digestion, a characteristic 10 base “ladder,” with no resistant high molecular weight DNA. Micrococcal nuclease and DNase II digested sperm nuclei to produce DNA fragments with a calculated repeat length of 248 ± 3 and 246 ± 6 base pairs, respectively. The structural basis for the 500 base pair cutting periodicity in sperm nuclei may reside in the unique sperm H1 histone.     

Accessibility of some regions of chromatin of leukemic chicken cells to single strand nuclease S1

The sensibility to single strand nuclease S₁ of DNA from Avian leukemic cells infected with Avian Myeloblastosis virus (A.M.V.) has been studied. The resulting DNA fragments were analysed by electrophoresis on agarose gels. Fragments of discrete size appear after 10 min of digestion when less than 1 % of the DNA is rendered acid-soluble. These fragments appear as multiple of a monomeric unit and are similar to the fragments produced by micrococcal nuclease digestion. In addition integrated proviral AMV sequences were preferentially degraded by DNAase I but not by S₁ nuclease.     

Preparation and structural characterization of nucleosomal core particles lacking one H2A.H2B dimer

Nucleosomal core particles lacking one H2A.H2B dimer, (H2A.H2B)1 (H3.H4)2/DNA (146 bp), have been prepared by treatment of nucleosomal cores with dimethylmaleic anhydride, a reversible reagent for protein amino groups. The preparative procedure is simple, produces quantitative conversion of nucleosomal cores into dimer-deficient cores without formation of other subnucleosomal particles, and can be applied to the preparation of different H2A.H2B-deficient mono and oligonucleosomal particles. The structural properties of the dimer-deficient cores and complete nucleosomal cores reconstituted from the deficient particles and H2A.H2B dimers have been studied by DNase I digestion, thermal denaturation and circular dichroism.     

Structural analysis of a reconstituted DNA containing three histone octamers and histone H5

Previous work has shown that DNA and the histone proteins will combine to form structures of a complex, yet definite nature. Here, we describe three experiments aimed at a better understanding of the interactions of DNA with the histone octamer and with histone H5. First, there has been some question as to whether the methylation of DNA could influence its folding about the histone octamer. To address this point, we reconstituted the histone octamer onto a 440 base-pair DNA of defined sequence at various levels of cytosine methylation, and also onto the unmethylated DNA. The reconstituted structures were probed by digestion with two different enzymes, micrococcal nuclease and DNase I. All samples were found to contain what appear to be three histone octamers, bound in close proximity on the 440 base-pair DNA. The cutting patterns of micrococcal nuclease and DNase I remain the same in all cases, even if the DNA has been extensively methylated. The results show, therefore, that methylation has little, or no, influence on the folding of this particular DNA about the histone octamer. Second, there has been concern as to whether the base sequence of DNA could determine its folding in a long molecule containing several nucleosomes, just as it does within any single, isolated nucleosome core. In order to deal with this problem, we cut the 440 base-pair DNA into three short fragments, each of nucleosomal length; we reconstituted each separately with the histone octamer; and then we digested the reconstituted complexes with DNase I for comparison with similar data from the intact 440 base-pair molecule. The results show that the folding of this DNA is influenced strongly by its base sequence, both in the three short fragments and in the long molecule. The rotational setting of the DNA within each of the three short fragments is as predicted from a computer algorithm, which measures its homology to 177 known examples of nucleosome core DNA. The rotational setting of the DNA in the 440 base-pair molecule remains the same as in two of the three short fragments, but changes slightly in a third case, apparently because of steric requirements when the nucleosomes pack closely against one another. Finally, there has been little direct evidence of where histone H5 binds within a DNA-octamer complex.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Benzo(a)pyrene 7,8-dihydrodiol-9,10-oxide modification of DNA: Relation to chromatin structure and reconstitution

Purified duck reticulocyte DNA was incubated in vitro with a 7,8-dihydrodiol-9,10-oxide derivative of benzo(a)pyrene (BPDE). The carcinogen-modified DNA was somewhat more susceptible to partial digestion by the single strand specific endonuclease S₁ than unmodified DNA, suggesting slight denaturation of the helix at sites of modification. Chromatin was reconstituted in vitro utilizing this carcinogen-modified DNA and unmodified-chromatin associated proteins. This reconstituted chromatin showed the same kinetics and extent of digestion by Staphylococcal nuclease, and similar nucleosome profiles on sucrose density gradient centrifugation, as those obtained with native chromatin or chromatin reconstituted with unmodified DNA. Moreover, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of DNA fragments obtained from nuclease digests gel electrophoresis of DNA fragments obtained from nuclease digests of the reconstituted chromatins suggested that the chromatin containing carcinogen-modified DNA had the same subnucleosome structure as that reconstituted with unmodified DNA. In a separate set of studies intact duck reticulocyte chromatin was reacted directly with BPDE. Nuclease digestion studies indicated that 65% of the carcinogen was bound to the ‘open’ regions of chromatin, and 35% to ‘closed’ regions.These results indicate that although covalent binding of a benzo(a)pyrene (BP) derivative to DNA produces local distortions in conformation of the helix, this modification does not appear to interfere with the ability of the DNA to associate with histones to form nucleosome structures. In addition, although DNA in the open regions of chromatin is more susceptible to reaction with the BP derivative, there is appreciable reaction with the DNA associated with histones.     

The histone H5 gene is flanked by S1 hypersensitive structures.

The potential of the cloned histone H5 gene to form altered DNA structures has been examined by S1 nuclease digestion of supercoiled recombinant plasmids containing up to 8.8 kbp of chicken DNa. The three main nicking sites map at the upstream and downstream sequences flanking the structural gene. The cleavage sites share sequence homology, strand specificity, and do not seem to be single-stranded. The sequence of the S1-sensitive sites does not suggest that the fragments can adopt any of the known DNA secondary structures.     

The assembly of an H2A2,H2B2,H3,H4 hexamer onto DNA under conditions of physiological ionic strength

A novel nucleohistone particle is generated in high yield when a complex of DNA with the four core histones formed under conditions that are close to physiological (0.15 M NaCl, pH 8) is treated with micrococcal nuclease. The particle was found to contain 102 base pairs of DNA in association with six molecules of histones in the ratio 2H2A:2H2B:1H3:1H4 after relatively brief nuclease treatment. Prolonged nuclease digestion resulted in a reduction in the DNA length to a sharply defined 92-base pair fragment that was resistant to further degradation. Apparently normal nucleosome core particles containing two molecules each of the four core histones in association with 145 base pairs of DNA and a particle containing one molecule each of histones H2A and H2B in association with approximately 40 base pairs of DNA were also generated during nuclease treatment of the histone-DNA complexes formed under physiological ionic strength conditions. Kinetic studies have shown that the hexamer particle is not a subnucleosomal fragment produced by the degradation of nucleosome core particles. Furthermore, the hexamer particle was not found among the products of nuclease digestion when histones and DNA were previously assembled in 0.6 M NaCl. The high sedimentation coefficient of the hexameric complex (8 S) suggests that the DNA component of the particle has a folded conformation.     

Nuclear reassemblyin vitro is independent of nucleosome/chromatin assembly

It was show11 that nuclear reassembly was induced by small pieces of DNA fragments in cell-free extracts ofXenopus. In an attempt to learn the relationship between the nuclear reassembly and nucleosome/chromatin assembly, limited amounts of CM-Cellulose are used to eliminate the capacity of the egg extract S-150 to assemble chromatin. while the forming of nucleosomes is checked with DNA supercoiling by plasmid DNA pBR322 incubated in the extract, and further analysed by micrococcal nuclease digestion. This depleted extract is then used to induce nuclear reassembly around demembraned sperms with membrane vesicles. It is found that CM-Cellulose depletes histones H2A and H2B efficiently and blocks the assembly of nucleosomes, the demembraned sperms are yet reconstituted into nuclei in the treated S-150, although the chromatin in reassembled nuclei does not produce protected DNA fragments when digested with micrococcal nuclease. It suggests that in the cell-free system ofXenopus, DNA can be formed into nuclei without assembly of nucleosomes or chromatin.     

Biochemical screening of stable dinucleosomes using DNA fragments from a dinucleosome DNA library

The dinucleosome is an informative unit for analysis of the higher-order chromatin structure. DNA fragments forming stable dinucleosomes were screened from a dinucleosome DNA library after the reconstitution of nucleosomes in vitro and digestion with micrococcal nuclease. Reconstituted dinucleosomes showed a diversity of sensitivity to micrococcal nuclease, suggesting that the biochemical stability of a dinucleosome depends, in part, on the DNA fragments. The DNA fragments after the screening were classified into three groups represented by clones bf10, af14 and af32 according to the sensitivity to micrococcal nuclease. Mapping of the nucleosome boundaries by Southern blotting of the DNA after restriction digestion and by primer extension analysis showed that each nucleosome position of clone af32 was fixed. Analysis of reconstituted dinucleosomes using mutant DNA fragments of clone af32 revealed a unique property characteristic of a key nucleosome, given that the replacement of a DNA fragment corresponding to the right nucleosome position resulted in marked sensitivity to micrococcal nuclease, whereas the replacement of the other nucleosome fragment had almost no effect on sensitivity as compared to the original af32 construct. The mutant construct in which the right nucleosome was removed showed multiple nucleosome phases, suggesting that the right nucleosome stabilized first each mononucleosome and then the dinucleosome. An oligonucleotide bending assay revealed that the DNA fragment in the right nucleosome included curved DNA, suggesting that the positioning activity of the nucleosome was attributed to its DNA structure. These results suggest that information for forming stable dinucleosome is embedded in the genomic DNA and that a further characterization of the key nucleosome is useful for understanding the building up of the chromatin structure.     

Remodeling of sperm chromatin after fertilization involves nucleosomes formed by sperm histones H2A and H2B and two CS histone variants

The composition of nucleosomes at an intermediate stage of male pronucleus formation was determined in sea urchins. Nucleosomes were isolated from zygotes harvested 10 min post-insemination, whole nucleoprotein particles were obtained from nucleus by nuclease digestion, and nucleosomes were subsequently purified by a sucrose gradient fractionation. The nucleosomes derived from male pronucleus were separated from those derived from female pronucleus by immunoadsorption to antibodies against sperm specific histones (anti-SpH) covalently bound to Sepharose 4B (anti-SpH-Sepharose). The immunoadsorbed nucleosomes were eluted, and the histones were analyzed by Western blots. Sperm histones (SpH) or alternatively, the histones from unfertilized eggs (CS histone variants), were identified with antibodies directed against each set of histones. It was found that these nucleosomes are organized by a core formed by sperm histones H2A and H2B combined with two major CS histone variants. Such a hybrid histone core interacts with DNA fragments of approximately 100 bp. It was also found that these atypical nucleosome cores are subsequently organized in a chromatin fiber that exhibits periodic nuclease hypersensitive sites determined by DNA fragments of 500 bp of DNA. It was found that these nucleoprotein particles were organized primarily by the hybrid nucleosomes described above. We postulate that this unique chromatin organization defines an intermediate stage of male chromatin remodeling after fertilization.     

The structural role of histone H1: properties of reconstituted chromatin with various H1 subfractions (H1-1, H1-2, and H1o).

A previous study on the distribution of histone H1 subfractions in chromatin suggested that these proteins differ in the protection they confer to DNA. To elucidate further this suggestion, reconstitution experiments were carried out with purified H1 subfractions (H1-1, H1-2, H1o) and H1-depleted chromatin. We have studied the structural properties of H1o as compared to those of other H1 fractions by electrophoretic analysis of DNA and mononucleosomes obtained after micrococcal nuclease digestion, thermal denaturation, and electron microscopy. The three fractions studied reassociate to H1-depleted chromatin. However, differences in the extent of DNA protection are observed between H1o and the other fractions: H1o induces a more rapid degradation of long oligomers into mononucleosomes; these mononucleosomes bearing H1o only, have a greater electrophoretic mobility; furthermore, thermal denaturation shows that a small fraction of DNA is less efficiently protected by H1o than by the other fractions. Electron microscopy, on the other hand, shows that these differences are not due to areas of chromatin devoid of H1o in the reconstitute and that the reconstituted samples are able, under proper ionic conditions, to refold in a higher-order structure.