Short term cyclin D1 overexpression induces centrosome amplification, mitotic spindle abnormalities, and aneuploidy

In normal cells, cyclin D1 is induced by growth factors and promotes progression through the G(1) phase of the cell cycle. Cyclin D1 is also an oncogene that is thought to act primarily by bypassing the requirement for mitogens during the G(1) phase. Studies of clinical tumors have found that cyclin D1 overexpression is associated with chromosome abnormalities, although a causal effect has not been established in experimental systems. In this study, we found that transient expression of cyclin D1 in normal hepatocytes in vivo triggered dysplastic mitoses, accumulation of supernumerary centrosomes, abnormalities of the mitotic spindle, and marked chromosome changes within several days. This was associated with up-regulation of checkpoint genes p53 and p21 as well as hepatocyte apoptosis in the liver. Transient transfection of cyclin D1 also induced centrosome and mitotic spindle abnormalities in breast epithelial cells, suggesting that this may be a generalized effect. These results indicate that cyclin D1 can induce deregulation of the mitotic apparatus and aneuploidy, effects that could contribute to the role of this oncogene in malignancy.     

DNA damage induces Chk1-dependent centrosome amplification

Centrosomal abnormalities are frequently observed in cancers and in cells with defective DNA repair. Here, we used light and electron microscopy to show that DNA damage induces centrosome amplification, not fragmentation, in human cells. Caffeine abrogated this amplification in both ATM (ataxia telangiectasia, mutated)- and ATR (ATM and Rad3-related)-defective cells, indicating a complementary role for these DNA-damage-responsive kinases in promoting centrosome amplification. Inhibition of checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) by RNA-mediated interference or drug treatment suppressed DNA-damage-induced centrosome amplification. Radiation-induced centrosome amplification was abrogated in Chk1(-/-) DT40 cells, but occurred at normal levels in Chk1(-/-) cells transgenically expressing Chk1. Expression of kinase-dead Chk1, or Chk1S345A, through which the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase cannot signal, failed to restore centrosome amplification, showing that signalling to Chk1 and Chk1 catalytic activity are necessary to promote centrosome overduplication after DNA damage.     

Suppression of centrosome duplication and amplification by deacetylases

Centrosome duplication is controlled both negatively and positively by a number of proteins. The activities and stabilities of those regulatory proteins are in many cases controlled by posttranslational modifications. Although acetylation and deacetylation are highly common posttranslational modifications, their roles in the regulation of centrosome duplication had not been closely examined. Here, through focusing on the deacetylases, we investigated the role of acetylation/deacetylation in the regulation of centrosome duplication and induction of abnormal amplification of centrosomes. We found that the deacetylation event negatively controls centrosome duplication and amplification. Of the 18 total known deacetylases (HDAC1–11, SIRT1–7), ten deacetylases possess the activity to suppress centrosome amplification, and their centrosome amplification suppressing activities are strongly associated with their abilities to localize to centrosomes. Among them, HDAC1, HDAC5 and SIRT1 show the highest suppressing activities, but each of them suppresses centrosome duplication and/or amplification with its unique mechanism.     

Suppression of centrosome duplication and amplification by deacetylases

Centrosome duplication is controlled both negatively and positively by a number of proteins. The activities and stabilities of those regulatory proteins are in many cases controlled by posttranslational modifications. Although acetylation and deacetylation are highly common posttranslational modifications, their roles in the regulation of centrosome duplication had not been closely examined. Here, through focusing on the deacetylases, we investigated the role of acetylation/deacetylation in the regulation of centrosome duplication and induction of abnormal amplification of centrosomes. We found that the deacetylation event negatively controls centrosome duplication and amplification. Of the 18 total known deacetylases (HDAC1–11, SIRT1–7), ten deacetylases possess the activity to suppress centrosome amplification, and their centrosome amplification suppressing activities are strongly associated with their abilities to localize to centrosomes. Among them, HDAC1, HDAC5 and SIRT1 show the highest suppressing activities, but each of them suppresses centrosome duplication and/or amplification with its unique mechanism.     

The mouse Mps1p-like kinase regulates centrosome duplication.

The yeast Mps1p protein kinase acts in centrosome duplication and the spindle assembly checkpoint. We demonstrate here that a mouse Mps1p ortholog (esk, which we designate mMps1p) regulates centrosome duplication. Endogenous mMps1p and overexpressed GFP-mMps1p localize to centrosomes and kinetochores in mouse cells. Overexpression of GFP-mMps1p causes reduplication of centrosomes during S phase arrest. In contrast, a kinase-deficient mutant blocks centrosome duplication altogether. Control of centrosome duplication by mMps1p requires a known regulator of the process, Cdk2. Inhibition of Cdk2 prevents centrosome reduplication and destabilizes mMps1p, causing its subsequent loss from centrosomes, suggesting that Cdk2 promotes mMps1p's centrosome duplication function by regulating its stability during S phase. Thus, mMps1p, an in vitro Cdk2 substrate, regulates centrosome duplication jointly with Cdk2.     

ECRG2 disruption leads to centrosome amplification and spindle checkpoint defects contributing chromosome instability

Cancer cells contain an abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidy), which is a prevalent form of genetic instability in human cancers. Abnormal amplification of centrosomes and defects of spindle assembly checkpoint are the major causes of chromosome instability in cancer cells. Here we present biochemical evidence to suggest a role of ECRG2, a novel tumor suppressor gene, in maintaining chromosome stability. ECRG2 localized to centrosomes during interphase and kinetochores during mitosis. Further analysis revealed that ECRG2 participates in centrosome amplification in a p53-dependent manner. Depletion of ECRG2 not only destabilized p53, down-regulated p21, and increased the cyclin E/CDK2 activity, thus initiating centrosome amplification, but also abolished the ability of p53 localize to centrosomes. Overexpression of ECRG2 restored the p53-dependent suppression of centrosome duplication. Furthermore, ECRG2-depleted cells show severely disrupted spindle phenotype but fail to maintain the mitotic arrest due to minimal BUBR1 protein levels. Taken together, our results indicate that ECRG2 is important for ensuring centrosome duplication, spindle assembly checkpoint, and accurate chromosome segregation, and its depletion may contribute to chromosome instability and aneuploidy in human cancers.     

Cdc14B depletion leads to centriole amplification, and its overexpression prevents unscheduled centriole duplication

Centrosome duplication is tightly controlled in coordination with DNA replication. The molecular mechanism of centrosome duplication remains unclear. Previous studies found that a fraction of human proline-directed phosphatase Cdc14B associates with centrosomes. However, Cdc14B's involvement in centrosome cycle control has never been explored. Here, we show that depletion of Cdc14B by RNA interference leads to centriole amplification in both HeLa and normal human fibroblast BJ and MRC-5 cells. Induction of Cdc14B expression through a regulatable promoter significantly attenuates centriole amplification in prolonged S phase-arrested cells and proteasome inhibitor Z-L(3)VS-treated cells. This inhibitory function requires centriole-associated Cdc14B catalytic activity. Together, these results suggest a potential function for Cdc14B phosphatase in maintaining the fidelity of centrosome duplication cycle.     

Haploinsufficiency of Parp1 accelerates Brca1-associated centrosome amplification, telomere shortening, genetic instability, apoptosis, and embryonic lethality

The breast tumor associated gene-1 (BRCA1) and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP1) are both involved in DNA-damage response and DNA-damage repair. Recent investigations have suggested that inhibition of PARP1 represents a promising chemopreventive/therapeutic approach for specifically treating BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast cancer. However, studies in mouse models reveal that Parp1-null mutation results in genetic instability and mammary tumor formation, casting significant doubt on the safety of PARP1 inhibition as a therapy for the breast cancer. To study the genetic interactions between Brca1 and Parp1, we interbred mice carrying a heterozygous deletion of full-length Brca1 (Brca1(+/Delta11)) with Parp1-null mice. We show that Brca1(Delta11/Delta11);Parp1(-/-) embryos die before embryonic (E) day 6.5, whereas Brca1(Delta11/Delta11) embryos die after E12.5, indicating that absence of Parp1 dramatically accelerates lethality caused by Brca1 deficiency. Surprisingly, haploinsufficiency of Parp1 in Brca1(Delta11/Delta11) embryos induces a severe chromosome aberrations, centrosome amplification, and telomere dysfunction, leading to apoptosis and accelerated embryonic lethality. Notably, telomere shortening in Brca1(Delta11/Delta11);Parp1(+/-) MEFs was correlated with decreased expression of Ku70, which plays an important role in telomere maintenance. Thus, haploid loss of Parp1 is sufficient to induce lethality of Brca1-deficient cells, suggesting that partial inhibition of PARP1 may represent a practical chemopreventive/therapeutic approach for BRCA1-associated breast cancer.     

p53-Driven apoptosis limits centrosome amplification and genomic instability downstream of NPM1 phosphorylation

Chromosome loss or gain is associated with a large number of solid cancers, providing genomic plasticity and thus adaptability to cancer cells. Numerical centrosome abnormalities arising from centrosome over-duplication or failed cytokinesis are a recognized cause of aneuploidy. In higher eukaryotic cells, the centrosome duplicates only once per cell cycle to ensure the formation of a bipolar mitotic spindle that orchestrates the balanced distribution of the sister chromatids to the respective daughter cells. Here we delineate the events that allow abnormal centrosome duplication, resulting in mitotic errors and incorrect chromosome segregation in cells with sustained cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity. We have identified NPM1 as a substrate for CDK6 activated by the Kaposi's sarcoma herpesvirus (KSHV) D-type cyclin and shown that p53-driven apoptosis occurs downstream of NPM1 phosphorylation as a checkpoint mechanism that prevents accumulation of cells with supernumerary centrosomes. Our findings provide evidence that abnormal chromosome segregation in KSHV-infected cells is a direct consequence of NPM1 phosphorylation and predict that genomic instability is an inevitable consequence of latent KSHV infection.     

PLK4 overexpression and its effect on centrosome regulation and chromosome stability in human gastric cancer

Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4) is a centrosomal protein that is involved in the regulation of centrosome duplication. This study aimed to determine whether the genetic abnormality of PLK4 is involved in human gastric cancer. First, we examined the status of PLK4 mRNA expression in 7 gastric cancer cell lines and 48 primary gastric cancers using an RT-PCR analysis. The upregulation of PLK4 mRNA expression was detected in 57.1 % (4/7) of the gastric cancer cell lines, and a novel PLK4 variant with exon 4, but without exon 5, was identified. In the primary gastric cancers, the upregulation of PLK4 mRNA expression in the cancerous cells was detected in 50.0 % (24/48) of the cases, and this upregulation was statistically significant (P value = 0.0139). Next, we established AGS gastric cancer cells capable of inducibly expressing PLK4 using the piggyBac transposon vector system and showed that PLK4 overexpression induced centrosome amplification and chromosome instability using immunofluorescence and FISH analyses, respectively. Furthermore, PLK4 overexpression suppressed primary cilia formation. Our current findings suggested that PLK4 is upregulated in a subset of primary gastric cancers and that PLK4 overexpression induces centrosome amplification and chromosome instability and causes the suppression of primary cilia formation.     

CP110, a cell cycle-dependent CDK substrate,regulates centrosome duplication in human cells

Centrosome duplication and separation are linked inextricably to certain cell cycle events, in particular activation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). However, relatively few CDK targets driving these events have been uncovered. Here, we have performed a screen for CDK substrates and have isolated a target, CP110, which is phosphorylated by CDKs in vitro and in vivo. Human CP110 localizes to centrosomes. Its expression is strongly induced at the G1-to-S phase transition, coincident with the initiation of centrosome duplication. RNAi-mediated depletion of CP110 indicates that this protein plays an essential role in centrosome duplication. Long-term disruption of CP110 phosphorylation leads to unscheduled centrosome separation and overt polyploidy. Our data suggest that CP110 is a physiological centrosomal CDK target that promotes centrosome duplication, and its deregulation may contribute to genomic instability.     

Mutations in Drosophila myb lead to centrosome amplification and genomic instability.

We have previously established that the single myb gene in Drosophila melanogaster, Dm myb, which is related to the proto-oncogene Myb, is required for the G2/M transition of the cell cycle and for suppression of endoreduplication in pupal wing cells. We now report that studies of the abdominal phenotype in loss-of-function Dm myb mutants reveal additional roles for Dm myb in the cell cycle, specifically in mitosis. Abdominal epidermal cells that are mutant for Dm myb proliferate more slowly than wild-type controls throughout pupation, with particularly sluggish progression through the early stages of mitosis. Abnormal mitoses associated with multiple functional centrosomes, unequal chromosome segregation, formation of micronuclei, and/or failure to complete cell division are common in the later cell cycles of mutant cells. Resulting nuclei are often aneuploid and/or polyploid. Similar defects have also been observed in loss-of-function mutations of the tumor suppressor genes p53, Brca1 and Brca2. These data demonstrate that in abdominal epidermal cells, Dm myb is required to sustain the appropriate rate of proliferation, to suppress formation of supernumerary centrosomes, and to maintain genomic integrity.     

Aneuploidy,centrosome activity and chromosome instability in cells deficient in homologous recombination repair

Chromosome instability and loss or gain of chromosomes are changes characteristic of many tumour cells and human disorders. However, the mechanism of these changes has not yet been fully determined. We have recently shown that hamster cell lines deficient in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes XRCC2 and XRCC3 have an elevated frequency of aneuploidy compared with wild-type cells and mutant cells transfected with the appropriate human gene. In addition, XRCC2 and XRCC3 deficient hamster cell lines show a high frequency of multiple centrosomes and abnormal spindle formation. Cells deficient in HRR show a high frequency of both chromosome-type and chromatid-type aberrations, which could potentially lead to mis-segregation. The role of chromosome aberrations and other factors, including chromosome lagging, premature chromatid separation, and centrosome malfunctioning on chromosome mis-segregation in irs1 and irs1SF cells have been investigated. In particular, the linkage of DNA repair proteins with centrosomes suggests a key role for the centrosome in controlling cellular repair processes.     

Downregulation of histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferase G9a induces centrosome disruption and chromosome instability in cancer cells

Background

Modifications of the histone amino-terminal tails affect access of regulatory factors and complexes to chromatin and thereby influence biological processes. Cancer cells are characterized by prominent epigenetic dysregulation, including histone modifications. However, the functional roles of the histone methyltransferases (HMT) in cancer remain unclear.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We studied RNAi-based inhibition (knockdown, KD) of 2 different H3K9 HMTs, SUV39H1 and G9a. Knockdown of the 2 HMTs in PC3 cancer cell line markedly inhibited cell growth and caused profound morphological changes with loss of telomerase activity and shortened telomeres. SUV39H1 KD cells showed substantial increase in G2/M fraction. G9a KD cells showed increased DNA content (1.7-fold in 2 independent clones) compared with FACS analyses to control. Karyotype analyses showed that this was due to an increased number of chromosomes (from 61 to 102) in G9a KD cells compared to parental PC3. Intriguingly, we found abnormal centrosome morphology and number in about 25% of the G9a KD cells, while centrosomes were morphologically normal in control cells. Microarray analyses after KD of SUV39H1 or G9a showed very few genes up-regulated among the 39,000 genes. The silenced tumor-suppressor genes p16 and RASSF1A were not activated in KD cells.

Conclusions/Significance

These data suggest that the 2 HMTs, SUV39H1 and G9a are required to perpetuate the malignant phenotype. Furthermore, G9a plays a critical role in regulating centrosome duplication presumably through chromatin structure rather than through affecting gene expression in cancer cells. Targeting these histone methyltransferases may be of therapeutic benefit in cancers.     

Cdc25A serine 123 phosphorylation couples centrosome duplication with DNA replication and regulates tumorigenesis

The cell division cycle 25A (Cdc25A) phosphatase is a critical regulator of cell cycle progression under normal conditions and after stress. Stress-induced degradation of Cdc25A has been proposed as a major way of delaying cell cycle progression. In vitro studies pointed toward serine 123 as a key site in regulation of Cdc25A stability after exposure to ionizing radiation (IR). To address the role of this phosphorylation site in vivo, we generated a knock-in mouse in which alanine was substituted for serine 123. The Cdc25 S123A knock-in mice appeared normal, and, unexpectedly, cells derived from them exhibited unperturbed cell cycle and DNA damage responses. In turn, we found that Cdc25A was present in centrosomes and that Cdc25A levels were not reduced after IR in knock-in cells. This resulted in centrosome amplification due to lack of induction of Cdk2 inhibitory phosphorylation after IR specifically in centrosomes. Further, Cdc25A knock-in animals appeared sensitive to IR-induced carcinogenesis. Our findings indicate that Cdc25A S123 phosphorylation is crucial for coupling centrosome duplication to DNA replication cycles after DNA damage and therefore is likely to play a role in the regulation of tumorigenesis.     

Dominant-negative mutant dynein allows spontaneous centrosome assembly, uncouples chromosome and centrosome cycles

Cleavage cycles commence and chromosome and centrosome cycles proceed in harmony following fertilization of Drosophila eggs and completion of the meiotic divisions. The sperm-introduced centrioles replicate, separate, and while recruit pericentriolar material centrosomes (CS) form. The CS nucleate asters of microtubules (MT). Spindles form following interaction of some astral MT with kinetochores. In unfertilized eggs, chromosomes do not replicate, and CS and MT asters never form, although their components are present in the egg cytoplasm; unknown mechanisms prevent chromosome replication and CS and MT assembly. In unfertilized Laborc(D) eggs, rudimentary CS assemble spontaneously and instantaneously and nucleate small MT asters. In fertilized Laborc(D) eggs, normal CS form and organize normal asters. However, the CS replicate prior to accomplishment of the first mitosis, and spindles with multiple CS develop. In fertilized Laborc(D) eggs, while the chromosome cycles cease, CS cycles proceed as in wild type. Knowing that Laborc(D) is a dominant-negative mutation and encodes the formation of mutant cytoplasmic dynein heavy chain molecules, we show here that cytoplasmic dynein is involved in prevention of CS assembly in unfertilized eggs and establishing harmony between the chromosome and the CS cycles.     

KIAA0101 interacts with BRCA1 and regulates centrosome number

To find genes and proteins that collaborate with BRCA1 or BRCA2 in the pathogenesis of breast cancer, we used an informatics approach and found a candidate BRCA interactor, KIAA0101, to function like BRCA1 in exerting a powerful control over centrosome number. The effect of KIAA0101 on centrosomes is likely direct, as its depletion does not affect the cell cycle, KIAA0101 localizes to regions coincident with the centrosomes, and KIAA0101 binds to BRCA1. We analyzed whether KIAA0101 protein is overexpressed in breast cancer tumor samples in tissue microarrays, and we found that overexpression of KIAA0101 correlated with positive Ki67 staining, a biomarker associated with increased disease severity. Furthermore, overexpression of the KIAA0101 gene in breast tumors was found to be associated with significantly decreased survival time. This study identifies KIAA0101 as a protein important for breast tumorigenesis, and as this factor has been reported as a UV repair factor, it may link the UV damage response to centrosome control.     

Pin1 interacts with c-Myb in a phosphorylation-dependent manner and regulates its transactivation activity

Activity and stability of the proto-oncogene c-Myb are regulated by post-translational modifications, though the molecular mechanisms underlying such control are only partially understood. Here we describe the functional interaction of c-Myb with Pin1, an isomerase that binds to phosphorylated Ser/Thr-Pro motifs. We found that co-expression of c-Myb and Pin1 led to a net increase of c-Myb transactivation activity, both on reporter constructs as well as on an endogenous target gene. DNA-binding studies revealed that Pin1 did not increase the association of c-Myb with its response element in DNA. The increase of c-Myb transactivation activity was strictly dependent on the presence of an active catalytic center in Pin1. We provide evidence that c-Myb and Pin1 physically interacted, both upon ectopic expression of the proteins in HEK-293 cells as well as in the more physiological setting of HL60 cells, where c-Myb and Pin1 are resident proteins. By point mutating each individual Ser/Thr-Pro motif in c-Myb as well as by using deletion mutants we show that S528 in the EVES-motif was the docking site for Pin1. Mass spectrometry confirmed that S528 is phosphorylated in vivo. Finally, functional studies showed that mutation of S528 to alanine almost abolished the increase of transactivation activity by Pin1. This study reveals a new paradigm by which phosphorylation controls c-Myb function.     

The centrosome cycle: Centriole biogenesis, duplication and inherent asymmetries

Centrosomes are microtubule-organizing centres of animal cells. They influence the morphology of the microtubule cytoskeleton, function as the base for the primary cilium and serve as a nexus for important signalling pathways. At the core of a typical centrosome are two cylindrical microtubule-based structures termed centrioles, which recruit a matrix of associated pericentriolar material. Cells begin the cell cycle with exactly one centrosome, and the duplication of centrioles is constrained such that it occurs only once per cell cycle and at a specific site in the cell. As a result of this duplication mechanism, the two centrioles differ in age and maturity, and thus have different functions; for example, the older of the two centrioles can initiate the formation of a ciliary axoneme. We discuss spatial aspects of the centrosome duplication cycle, the mechanism of centriole assembly and the possible consequences of the inherent asymmetry of centrioles and centrosomes.