The effect of insecticides and a plant barrier row on aphid populations and the spread of bean yellow mosaic potyvirus and subterranean clover red leaf luteovirus in Vicia faba in South Australia

The effect of the insecticides malathion, demeton-S-methyl and disulfoton, and a barley barrier row on the rate and pattern of spread of bean yellow mosaic potyvirus (BYMV) and subterranean clover red leaf luteovirus (SCRLV) in Vicia faba was investigated in field plots with artificially introduced sources of viruses and vectors. The systemic insecticide treatments reduced aphid populations in the plots and this was associated with reduced spread of SCRLV, but not of BYMV. The barley barrier did not affect aphid populations in plots; however, it reduced the spread of BYMV to rows 1 · 1 m from the source but had only a minor effect on the spread of SCRLV. Apterae rather than alates of Aulacorthum solani were implicated in the spread of SCRLV. Spread of BYMV was attributed mainly to alate migrants of Myzus persicae and Macrosiphum euphorbiae, but other aphid species and morphs which occurred in high populations at the times of most rapid virus spread may also have had an active role as vectors of BYMV.     

The effect of time of sowing on the incidence of subterranean clover red leaf virus infection in broad bean (Vicia faba)

Yield losses in broad beans due to subterranean clover red leaf virus (SCRLV) in 1972/73 were 21, 30, 61 and 8% in plots sown in May, July, September and November respectively. The variations in yield loss resulted from differing levels of virus infection during periods in which harvestable pods were set because further pod set virtually ceased after symptoms of infection became apparent. The increases in infection were paralleled by increases in the infestation of Aulacorthum solani the aphid vector of SCRLV. Yield losses were greatest in the September-sown plots because the plants emerged at the commencement of the spring peak of aphid flight and were least in the November-sown plots which emerged after the peak of aphid flight had declined. However, potential yields decreased with deferment of sowing time and recorded yields were greatest from May-sown plots.
Yield losses due to SCRLV in 1973/74 were 79 and 91% for plots sown in May and September respectively. These larger yield losses resulted from an earlier and more rapid colonisation of plants by A. solani than in the previous year.
Choice of May as sowing date would not have controlled the disease satisfactorily in 1973/74 but would have been practical in the previous season when colonisation by A. solani was delayed so that little infection with SCRLV occurred before pod set had ceased.     

Deploying strain specific hypersensitive resistance to diminish temporal virus spread

Spread of necrotic and non‐necrotic strains of Bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV) was compared when aphid vectors moved both types from external or internal virus sources to plots of Lupinus spp. (lupin). Regardless of whether virus sources were internal or external, removed or left in place, and spread was within plots with homologous sources or across buffers to plots containing the opposite type of virus source, non‐necrotic BYMV always spread faster than necrotic BYMV in plots of L. angustifolius (narrow‐leafed lupin). When necrotic BYMV spread from external sources into plots sown with two L. angustifolius genotypes differing in their necrosis responses to different BYMV strain groups and one genotype of L. luteus (yellow lupin) giving only non‐necrotic responses, differing symptom reactions in the two L. angustifolius genotypes revealed presence of two distinct necrotic BYMV strain groups and overall virus spread was greater in this species than in L. luteus. Spread of non‐necrotic BYMV in L. angustifolius was always polycyclic in nature. However, when it came initially from external sources, spread of necrotic BYMV was largely monocyclic. This work demonstrates how temporal virus spread can be diminished when hypersensitive (necrotic) resistance is deployed and the limitations associated with employing hypersensitivity that is strain specific.     

Parasitoids aid dispersal of a nonpersistently transmitted plant virus by disturbing the aphid vector

• 1 Aphids are the major group of insects that vector plant viruses, and they often display a preference for foliage showing disease symptoms. Although this behaviour will increase the numbers of vectors acquiring the pathogen, it will not in itself result in a greater spread of the disease.
• 2 The present study examined how infection of Vicia faba by the nonpersistently transmitted virus bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV) affected colonization by pea aphids Acyrthosiphon pisum. We then examined how foraging by the hymenopterous parasitoid Aphidius ervi affected aphid settling/movement behaviour and the consequences for dissemination of the virus.
• 3 In Petri dish arenas, aphids colonized discs from BYMV‐infected leaves more rapidly than discs from uninfected plants. Reflectance from infected foliage was approximately 20% higher than from uninfected leaves in the green–yellow wavelengths, indicating that aphids might be responding to visual cues from the brighter foliage. Settling was reduced by A. ervi, with the foraging wasps preventing the aphids reaching and/or remaining on the leaf tissue.
• 4 In multiple plant arenas, A. ervi caused a reduction in aphid numbers but also a nine‐fold increase in BYMV infection. It is hypothesized that disturbance by the parasitoids resulted in more aphid movement as well as more cases of aphids probing on a BYMV‐infected plant and then a new host within the critical time period for successful inoculation to occur. This effect of parasitoids on virus dispersal should be considered in epidemiological models of insect‐vectored plant diseases, and also when evaluating the use of natural enemies in biocontrol strategies of insect herbivore/vector pests.

     

Effects of cereal borders, admixture with cereals and plant density on the spread of bean yellow mosaic potyvirus into narrow-leafed lupins (Lupinus angustifolius)

In studies of virus control measures, field experiments in 1987–1991 investigated the effects of cereal and fallow borders, admixture with cereals and plant density on spread of bean yellow mosaic potyvirus (BYMV) from pastures dominated by subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum) into plots of narrow-leafed lupins (Lupinus angustifolius). Virus spread was mainly monocyclic because BYMV killed infected lupin plants and between systemic movement and death there was only a brief period for BYMV acquisition and transmission to other plants by vector aphids. In plots with cereal borders, the rate and extent of BYMV spread into the lupins was decreased; at final assessment the numbers of infected plants were 43–60% less than in plots with fallow borders. Admixture with cereals also decreased the rate and extent of BYMV spread into lupin plots, numbers of infected plants being decreased by 76–96% at the time of final assessment. When lupins were sown at different seeding rates to generate a range of plant densities and weeds were removed, high densities decreased BYMV infection. The higher incidences of BYMV infection in sparse stands were attributed partly to smaller plant numbers and partly to incoming viruliferous vector aphids being more attracted to plants with bare earth around them, than to a plant canopy. BYMV infection decreased grain yield of samples from infected lupin plants by 94–100%. In plots with 34% infection and sparse stands, grain yield was decreased by about one third. Plotted progress curves for the accumulated numbers of alate aphids of the BYMV vector species Acyrthosiphon kondoi and Myzus persicae resembled those for numbers of BYMV infected plants in 1990, but in 1991 only the curve plotted for M. persicae did so. There was a 2 week delay between the curves for aphid numbers and virus counts which reflected the time taken for obvious systemic necrotic symptoms to develop in lupins.     

Relationship between inoculum density and vector phenology on the incidence of potato virus Y in tobacco

The epidemiology of potato virus Y (PVY) in the tobacco crop, Nicotiana tabacum, was examined in the context of the seasonal abundance of aphid vectors, rate of disease progress, and disease gradient from a known virus source. The spring potato crop, Solanum tuberosum, was suspected of being the main source of inoculum; therefore, varying numbers of infected potato plants were used as the inoculum source in different test plots. A 3-wk lag phase was present in all disease progress curves prior to an exponential increase in disease incidence. The relatively low numbers of aphid vectors, primarily transient species, alighting on the crop during the lag phase were responsible for the primary spread of PVY from potato to tobacco. The arrival of large numbers of colonising aphid vectors, Myzus persicae, presumably from the harvested potatoes, coincided with the exponential increase in PVY incidence in tobacco. The initial number of potato plants infected with PVY was positively correlated with the final disease incidence, rate of disease progress, and the magnitude of radial dispersion of PVY into the tobacco. Aphid vector pressure was not a significant variable in the differences in spatial and temporal characteristics of PVY epidemics among test plots.     

Patterns of spread of two non-persistently aphid-borne viruses in lupin stands under four different infection scenarios

Patterns of spread of Bean yellow mosaic virus (necrotic type, BYMV‐N) and Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) were examined in stands of narrow‐leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) where naturally occurring aphid vectors moved them from external or internal primary virus sources. The lupin stands were: commercial crops near BYMV‐infected clover pasture with or without an intervening non‐host barrier crop; a large rectangular block with BYMV‐N and CMV sources on opposite sides and a narrow, non‐host barrier crop facing the BYMV‐N source; and a plot within which seed‐infected lupin plants acted as internal CMV sources. When BYMV‐N spread into commercial crops in the absence of a non‐host barrier, there was a steep decline in its incidence with distance from the crop edge. However, when a 20 m‐wide perimeter barrier of oats intervened between the two, there was only a shallow decline. When CMV and BYMV‐N spread from opposite directions into a block with a 0.25 m‐wide oat barrier between it and the BYMV‐N source, the BYMV‐N incidence gradient was shallow but in the opposite direction the CMV gradient was steep. When CMV spread from primary sources within a plot, infection was concentrated in large internal patches. Spread of BYMV‐N was more diffuse with more isolated symptomatic plants and small clusters than occurred with CMV, spread of which was more comprehensive, reacting the near monocyclic and polycyclic patterns of spread with BYMV‐N with CMV respectively. Spread of both viruses was greater along than across rows, especially with CMV. With BYMV‐N, three different phased cycles of secondary spread were evident in the individual symptomatic plants within the small clusters that formed away from the edges of lupin stands. These findings help validate inclusion of perimeter non‐host barriers within an integrated disease management strategy for BYMV‐N in lupin.     

The influence of primary infection date and establishment of vector populations on the spread of yellowing viruses in sugar beet

In three field experiments in 1985 and 1986, we studied the effect of the date of primary infection on the spread of beet yellows closterovirus (BYV) and beet mild yellowing luteovirus (BMW) from artificially inoculated sugar beet plants. Laboratory-reared vector aphids, Myzus persicae, were placed on these sources of virus. There was no substantial natural immigration of vectors or viruses. In two experiments, one with BMYV in 1985 and the other in BYV in 1986, populations of vector aphids remained low and there was little virus spread, i.e. c. 50 infected plants from one primarily infected source. The cause of this small amount of spread was the low number of vector aphids. In the third experiment, with BYV in 1986, large populations of M. persicae developed and there was substantial virus spread: c. 2000 infected plants in the plots which were inoculated before canopy closure. In later-inoculated plots in the same experiment, there was much less spread: c. 100 infected plants per virus source plant. Differences between fields in predator impact are implicated as the most probable factor causing differences in vector establishment and virus spread between these three experiments. Virus spread decreased with later inoculation in all three experiments. A mathematical model of virus spread incorporating results from our work has been used to calculate how the initial proportion of infected plants in a crop affects the final virus incidence. This model takes into account the effect of predation on the development of the aphid populations. The processes underlying the spread and its timing are discussed.     

Comparing the plant virus spread patterns of non-persistently transmitted virus and persistently transmitted virus using an individual-based model

To compare the spread patterns between two types of plant viruses, non-persistent virus (NPV) and persistent virus (PV), we developed a spatially-explicit individual-based model. Our probability-based model is driven by the actions of insect vectors that are affected by interactions with host plants and plant viruses, considering both biological and behavioral components of their relationship. As a model system, we used potato virus y and potato leafroll virus, respectively for NPV and PV, potato for host plant, and Myzus persicae for the insect vector; empirical results from previous studies were acquired and adjusted to be used as our parameter values. Our simulation results showed that initial infection of PV in the field resulted in over 1.3 times greater number of insect vectors while causing approximately 7 times greater number of virus-infected plants compared to NPV by the end of simulation. Furthermore, spatial analysis showed that PV-infected plants showed greater aggregation in the field, forming larger patches compared to NPV-infected plants. Our results demonstrated the importance of host plant and insect vector manipulation by plant viruses as well as biological properties such as infectious period in the insect on the difference in overall spread pattern.     

Soybean leaf pubescence affects aphid vector transmission and field spread of soybean mosaic virus

A study was undertaken to determine the influence of trichome density on the spread of non-persistently transmitted plant viruses by aphid vectors. A system using soybean plants and soybean mosaic virus (SMV) tested the hypothesis that greater leaf trichome density inhibits probing activity of vector species, leading to reduced virus spread and retarded virus epidemics under field conditions. Probing activity of three important aphid vectors of SMV, Myzus persicae, Rhopalosiphum maidis, and Aphis citricola, was affected by the density of soybean leaf trichomes. Less pubescent and glabrous isolines elicited greater probing activity than did densely pubescent isolines. Among the parameters considered, probe duration was found to be species specific, whereas the following traits were consistent among species for the denser isolines: reduced numbers of probes, greater length of time to first probe, and less time spent probing. Laboratory transmission of soybean mosaic virus was reduced in the more densely pubescent isolines by the vector species tested. Field spread of SMV was negatively correlated with density of pubescence. In our system, we found that denser leaf pubescence retards field epidemics of non-persistently transmitted plant viruses.     

Effect of strain-specific hypersensitive resistance on spatial patterns of virus spread

Spatial patterns of spread were compared between strains of Bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV) that differ in causing systemic necrotic (hypersensitive) or non‐necrotic symptoms in narrow‐leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius). Both types of BYMV were spread naturally by aphids from adjacent infected pasture into a large lupin block (‘natural spread site’), or from clover plants introduced as virus sources into two field experiments with lupin. Cumulative spatial data for plants with disease symptoms from a range of times in the growing period were assessed using Spatial Analysis by Distance IndicEs (SADIE). At the‘natural spread site’, with non‐necrotic BYMV, the extent of clustering of plants with symptoms increased gradually over time, while with necrotic BYMV there was less clustering and no increase over time. In both experiments, for the type of BYMV that was introduced into a plot, there was a gradual increase in clustering, but with this being greater with non‐necrotic BYMV. In the second experiment, there was also significant clustering of plants with symptoms of non‐necrotic BYMV in plots without introduced non‐necrotic foci but not for necrotic BYMV in plots without introduced necrotic foci. When clustering data for plants with newly recorded symptoms was tested for spatial association between successive assessment dates, association was positive for both BYMV types though stronger for the non‐necrotic type, declining as the temporal lag increased. Generally, association was strongest for assessments 2–3 wk apart, corresponding approximately to the period for BYMV to move systemically in plants and for obvious symptoms to appear in shoot tips. Contour maps for local association between dates showed that the strongest spatial associations were from coincidence of infection gaps rather than infection patches. The combination of information from clustering and association analysis showed that spread of non‐necrotic BYMV is less diffuse, with considerably more localised infection surrounding the infection sources. This work demonstrates how spatial virus spread can be diminished when hypersensitive (necrotic) resistance is deployed, and the limitations associated with employing hypersensitivity that is strain specific.     

Alfalfa mosaic and cucumber mosaic virus infection in chickpea and lentil: incidence and seed transmission

Samples collected in 1994 and 1995 from commercial crops of chickpeas and lentils growing in the agricultural region of south-west Western Australia were tested for infection with alfalfa mosaic (AMV) and cucumber mosaic (CMV) viruses, and for members of the family Potyviridae using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In 1994 no virus was detected in the 21 chickpea crops tested but in 1995, out of 42 crops, AMV was found in two and CMV in seven. With lentils, AMV and/or CMV was found in three out of 14 crops in 1994 and 4 out of 13 in 1995, both viruses being detected in two crops in each year. Similar tests on samples from chickpea and lentil crops and plots growing at experimental sites, revealed more frequent infection with both viruses. No potyvirus infection was found in chickpeas or lentils in agricultural areas either in commercial crops or at experimental sites. However, bean yellow mosaic virus (BYMV) was detected along with AMV and CMV in irrigated plots of chickpeas and lentils at a site in Perth. When samples of seed from infected crops or plots of chickpeas and lentils were germinated and leaves or roots of seedlings tested for virus infection by ELISA, AMV and CMV were found to be seed-borne in both while BYMV was seed-borne in lentils. The rates of transmission found through seed of chickpea to seedlings were 0.1–1% with AMV and 0.1–2% with CMV. Seed transmission rates with lentil were 0.1–5% for AMV, 0.1–1% for CMV and 0.8% for BYMV. Individual seed samples of lentil and chickpea sometimes contained both AMV and CMV. With both species, infection with AMV and CMV was sometimes found in commercial seed stocks or seed stocks from multiplication crops of advanced selections nearing release as new cultivars. Seed-borne virus infection has important practical implications, as virus sources can be re-introduced every year to chickpea and lentil crops or plots through sowing infected seed stocks leading to spread of infection by aphid vectors, losses in grain yield and further contamination of seed stocks.     

Measuring and modelling the effects of inoculation date and aphid flights on the secondary spread of Beet mosaic virus in sugar beet

The effect of the inoculation date on the spread of Beet mosaic virus (BtMV) in sugar beet field plots was studied. Two plants in the centre of each plot were inoculated with BtMV using Myzus persicae. The spread of the infection around these sources was monitored by inspecting the plants on two diagonal transects through the centre of the plot. Early inoculations resulted in a greater spread than late inoculations, but any inoculation before the onset of the aphid migration resulted in a similar‐sized spread. The spread was concentrated in patches around the inoculated plants, and its rate was explained by vector pressure, as shown by regression analysis and a mechanistic simulation model. This vector pressure was quantified using data obtained by catching aphids in a green water trap in the crop, catching aphids in a 12 m high suction trap at a distant location, and infection of bait plants from adjacent virus source plants. The daily total aphid catches obtained by a suction trap provided the best statistical explanation for the spread of this virus. The parameter r, describing the relationship between vector pressure and the rate of disease progress, was remarkably robust. This parameter varied less than 10% between treatments (infection date) within a single experiment, and less than a factor two between four experiments performed at different sites in two years. The robustness of this parameter suggests that the spread of a potyvirus may be predicted on the basis of the initial infection date and vector abundance.     

Patterns of spread of Carrot virus Y in carrot plantings and validation of control measures

Patterns of spread of Carrot virus Y (CarVY) were examined in carrot plantings in Western Australia into which naturally occurring aphid vectors spread the virus from external infection sources. Within three field trials, CarVY ‘infector’ plants were introduced between or at different distances from carrot plantings. There was a marked decline in CarVY incidence over distance from adjacent introduced infection sources. Clusters of infected plants that enlarged and coalesced were concentrated next to such sources but, later, isolated, expanding clusters formed further away. With a small external virus source, initial spread into the edge of a planting was less extensive than with a larger source. When 15‐m‐wide fallow areas separated a CarVY source from carrot plots, spread was much slower than when the separation was only 1 m; it was also slower upwind than downwind of this source. The data collected help validate the inclusion of isolation and ‘safe’ planting distances, intervening fallow, planting upwind, prompt removal of virus sources, avoidance of side‐by‐side plantings and manipulation of planting date within an integrated disease management strategy for CarVY in carrots.     

Spread of barley yellow dwarf virus and relative importance of local aphid vectors in central Washington

Data from bioassays of field collected aphids, barley indicator plants exposed to natural conditions, and various types of aphid traps were used to describe the spread of barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) in wheat and barley near Prosser, Washington. Bioassays were also used to assess the relative importance of local vector species. Of alate aphids collected from grain in the 1982 and 1983 fall migration seasons, 3.4–14–5% transmitted BYDV. Data from concurrent and post-migration assays of resident aphids (apterae and nymphs) reflected an increase in the proportion of infected plants in the field. Maximum increase in the percentage of viruliferous aphids occurred in late November and December of 1982 and November of 1983. The 1982 increase occurred after aphid flights had ceased for the year, suggesting active secondary spread. Collections in pitfall traps and infected trap plants from November to February confirmed aphid activity and virus spread. Rhopalosiphum padi was the most important vector in central Washington in 1982 and 1983 because of its abundance and relative BYDV transmission efficiency. Metopolophium dirhodum was more winter-hardy than R. padi and equal to R. padi in its efficiency as a vector; however, it was not as abundant as R. padi except during the mild winter of 1982–83, when it was a major contributor to secondary spread. Sitobion avenae may be important in years when it is abundant, but it was only a quarter as efficient as R. padi. Rhopalosiphum maidis was a much less efficient vector than R. padi and it only reached high populations in late autumn barley.     

Aphids from mangold clamps and their importance as vectors of beet viruses

Mangold clamps are over-wintering sources of the aphid-transmitted beet mosaic, beet yellows and beet mild yellowing viruses, and of several species of aphid, three of the most common in clamps being Myzus persicae, Rhopalosiphoninus staphyleae tulipaellus and R. latysiphon. This study attempted to assess the relative importance of the different species in spreading viruses from clamps. Compared with M. persicae, R. s. tulipaellus and R. latysiphon are seldom trapped in flight, except near large infestations. Alatae of M. persicae and R. s. tulipaellus become common in clamps in April, but few fly below 15d? C., a temperature seldom reached in eastern England in early spring. Flight muscle autolysis, which occurs later in R. s. tulipaellus and R. latysiphon than in some aphid species, also probably prevents many alatae in clamps from flying. We confirmed the importance of clamps as sources of beet viruses, the percentage of infected plants decreasing with increasing distance from infested clamps. M. persicae is shown to be a better vector of beet viruses than the other clamp aphids, and is probably responsible for most virus spread from clamps. R. s. tulipaellus did not transmit beet mosaic virus, but it is a fairly efficient vector of beet yellows and beet mild yellowing viruses, and, although we did not find this species on sugar beet in the field, it probably spreads these viruses from clamps. R. latysiphon did not transmit any of the viruses, and the role of Macrosiphum euphorbiae, Aulacorthum solani and Myxus ascalonicus is probably small.     

Transmission of Zucchini yellow mosaic virus by Colonizing and Non-colonizing Aphids in Greece and New Aphid Species Vectors of the Virus

Nineteen aphid species were tested for their ability to transmit Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) from and to zucchini under laboratory conditions. Sixteen species were found to be new vectors of ZYMV (i.e. Aphis craccae, Aphis fabae, Aphis nerii, Aulacorthum solani, Brachycaudus cardui, Brevicoryne brassicae, Hyalopterus pruni complex, Hyperomyzus lactucae, Macrosiphoniella sanborni, Macrosiphum rosae, Metopolophium dirhodum, Myzus cerasi, Rhopalosiphum maidis, R. padi, Semiaphis dauci and Sipha maydis). Their transmission efficiency by a single aphid was low (0.1–4.2%). Myzus persicae was used as a control and was the most efficient vector (41.1%, one aphid per plant). Hayhurstia atriplicis, Myzus ascalonicus and Sitobion avenae did not transmit the virus. In four out of six new vectors assayed in arena tests for propensity estimation, propensity was higher than efficiency. Data from an experimental zucchini field in northern Greece revealed a high correlation between ZYMV spread and alatae of the vector species. The most abundant aphid vectors during 2 years experimentation were M. persicae, Aphis gossypii and Aphis spiraecola. The possible role of the 16 new and the previously known aphid vectors in the epidemiology of ZYMV was investigated using data of transmission efficiency combined with the captures of their alatae in the Greek net of a Rothamsted type suction trap.     

Insecticidal control of aphids and the spread of potato leafroll virus in potato crops in eastern Scotland

Field experiments were carried out in eastern Scotland in 1976-78 to test the ability of granular insecticides, applied to soil at planting, and of insecticide sprays applied to the foliage, to control aphids and spread of potato leafroll virus (PLRV) in potatoes. The three years provided contrasting opportunities for virus spread. In 1976, the main vector of PLRV, Myzus persicae, arrived in early June and multiplied rapidly in untreated plots, and PLRV spread extensively. In 1977, M. persicae arrived 4–6 wk later than in 1976 and most spread of PLRV, which was less than in 1976, occurred after the end of July. In 1978, few M. persicae were recorded but the potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae, arrived early and very large populations developed in untreated plots. However, little spread of PLRV occurred in 1978, supporting other evidence that M. euphorbiae is an inefficient vector of PLRV in field conditions. In each year, granular insecticides decreased PLRV spread to a quarter or less of that in control plots. Thiofanox gave somewhat better and longer-lasting control of aphid populations than disulfoton, especially of M. persicae, but did not give greater control of PLRV spread. Application of three (1976) or five (1977) sprays of demeton-S-methyl to plots treated with granular insecticides further improved the control of M. euphorbiae but had less or no effect on M. persicae, especially where organophosphorus resistant aphids (R1 strain) were found. These supplementary sprays of insecticide did not further improve the control of PLRV but, in 1978, four sprays of demephion or pirimicarb to plots not treated with granular insecticide decreased PLRV spread. These data, together with previous findings, indicate that the amount of virus spread depends on the date of arrival and rate of multiplication of M. persicae in relation to the timing and effectiveness of removal of PLRV sources in crops. It is concluded that in Scotland insecticide granules should be used routinely only in crops of the highest grade of seed potato. Their use for other grades need be considered only in years following mild winters, when aphids can be expected to enter crops earlier and in larger numbers.     

Reflective mulch decreases the spread of two non-persistently aphid transmitted viruses to narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius)

Trials were done in 1987–1989, to investigate the effect of a reflective aluminium painted polythene mulch in protecting rows of narrow-leafed lupin ( Lupinus angustifolius ) from infection with two non-persistently aphid-transmitted viruses, bean yellow mosaic (BYMV) and cucumber mosaic (CMV). The mulch greatly decreased the rate and extent of spread of BYMV from external sources into mulch-protected rows in two trials, but was somewhat less effective in a third. The rate and extent of spread of CMV from an adjacent external source into reflective mulch-protected rows was also greatly decreased in one trial in which the mulch also decreased spread within rows and was effective even when the primary infection source was only 2.5 m away. In a trial sown with CMV-infected seed ( c . 2% seed transmission), the mulch decreased CMV spread from primary foci within rows. Reflective mulch can be used to protect breeders' single row plots of lupins from infection with CMV and BYMV.