p53与细胞畸变的抑制

有关p53蛋白的研究,近年来开展得极为广泛。p53蛋白作为一种极其重要的肿瘤抑制子不但在细胞凋亡和细胞生长抑制中起着重要的作用,而且还参与了细胞衰老的调控,并与细胞分化关系密切。本文对当前在有关p53分子研究方面取得的成果进行了综述,希望它有助于这方面研究工作的进一步开展。     

p63和p63参与p53依赖的细胞凋亡过程

人们通常用经典的操作式学习方法来训练动物的行为 ,使动物学会根据外部信号 (如声音 )产生特定的行为反应 ,以获取奖赏 (如食物 )。而本文的作者用脑内植入微电极进行脑区刺激的方法教会动物如何学习 ,可以去除用来产生信号和奖赏的外部环境对实验的限制。这一动物模型使操作者能远距离地指挥动物的行为 ,很像控制智能机器人的方法。电刺激能否产生等同于信号或奖赏的效应 ,取决于它所刺激的脑区。作者在自由活动大鼠的躯体感觉皮层 (ＳＩ)左右两侧胡须代表区和内侧前脑束 (ＭＦＢ)内植入电极加以刺激 ,以产生信号和奖赏效应 ,据此准确地指…     

p53与癌症治疗

p53蛋白是一种重要的肿瘤抑制蛋白,它可以诱导肿瘤细胞生长停滞、衰老以及程序化死亡.由于它在癌细胞抑制中的至关重要作用,因而目前关于癌症的治疗大多数都是直接或间接通过调控p53蛋白来实现的.文中主要介绍了近几年来p53蛋白在理论和临床上最新的研究进展.     

抑癌基因p53与细胞自噬

细胞自噬(autophagy)是一种在进化上高度保守的代谢通路,它发生的分子机制和信号调控途径相当复杂,其中mTOR信号通路和Beclin1复合物发挥了最重要的调控作用,p53也是细胞自噬重要的调节因子。研究发现,p53可通过多种途径调节细胞自噬水平,这主要决定于它的亚细胞定位。在细胞核中,p53可通过多种方式上调细胞自噬;而在细胞质中,p53对细胞自噬具有负性调节作用,可抑制细胞自噬的发生。探究清楚p53与细胞自噬之间的调控关系将有助于人类正确认识由于细胞自噬功能异常所诱导的肿瘤的发生发展过程,从而最终攻克各种肿瘤性疾病。     

p53基因及其功能研究进展

p53基因是一种肿瘤抑制基因,野生型p53对细胞周期和细胞凋亡起重要作用。其编码的蛋白P53相对分子质量为53×103,可刺激Cipt基因产生相对分子质量为21×103的蛋白,该蛋白可以抑制促使细胞通过细胞周期进入有丝分裂的酶的活性,进而抑制细胞生长表达而调控细胞生长,对于预防和治疗胆管癌、肝癌、胃癌等疾病有重要作用。我们在此简要阐述国内外对p53基因及其编码产物的结构、作用机制、检测、功能等方面的研究进展。     

淋巴细胞凋亡与p53蛋白表达关系的研究

培养B95-8细胞,分离EB病毒,转染外周血和扁桃体淋巴细胞,建立永生化的LCLs和TLCL细胞株; 带有wt P₅₃基因的LCLs在DNA损伤剂——顺铂处理前未检出p53蛋白,经顺铂处理后,LCLs随作用时间延长细胞存活率明显下降、p53蛋白水平升高、DNA电泳显出梯状带;含mt P₅₃基因的淋巴瘤细胞在顺铂处理前可检出高浓度的p53蛋白,经顺铂处理后,细胞存活率与p53蛋白并无明显改变.这些结果表明：顺铂引起细胞DNA损伤、激活wt p53蛋白的表达、继而wt p53蛋白又促进了DNA损伤细胞凋亡.     

P53脉冲的研究现状与展望

P53脉冲是指细胞内p53蛋白水平周期性或重复性的涨落.该脉冲产生的途径是调节p53的各种正负反馈环,其核心的两个负反馈环是p53-Mdm2环和Wip1-ATM-p53环.这些负反馈环能产生极限环振荡,在极限环振荡区,P53水平成脉冲型变化.随着P53脉冲的增多,不同形式的p53蛋白和促凋亡蛋白逐渐积累并到达一定阈值水平,可打开凋亡"开关",引发不可逆的细胞命运.除了P53脉冲的数目,其频率、振幅、波形等物理学参数也与细胞命运存在密切关系.这一研究进展对阐明诸多疾病发生机理和防治研究有重要意义.     

新的抑癌基因ASPP对p53作用的研究进展

p53是一个肿瘤抑制蛋白,它是通过调节相关基因表达,诱导细胞凋亡。p53诱导细胞凋亡的机制多年来一直不太清楚,而最近发现的ASPP(apoptosis stimulating protein of p53)蛋白家族对p53诱导细胞凋亡的机制研究有了新的进展。本文就此作一综述。     

p53调控肿瘤代谢的研究进展

发挥着重要作用.越来越多的研究发现, p53不仅能够维持细胞氧化还原平衡和代谢稳定,还有效调控细胞内铁死亡过程,进而影响癌细胞生长.另外, p53通过参与肿瘤细胞代谢重编程活动,可显著增强肿瘤抑制能力.然而,突变型p53会失去抑瘤能力,并表现出与野生型p53不同的代谢调控功能.本文首先围绕p53对肿瘤细胞不同代谢途径的调控及其参与的氧化应激反应和自噬过程进行总结,然后详细梳理了肿瘤细胞中p53翻译后修饰和突变型p53的功能变化,最后对p53在调控肿瘤代谢方面的重要作用进行展望.期望该工作为研究者深入了解p53对肿瘤代谢的调控功能及其抗癌机制提供参考.     

p53 regulates a non-apoptotic death induced by ROS

DNA damage induced by reactive oxygen species and several chemotherapeutic agents promotes both p53 and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) activation. p53 activation is well known to regulate apoptotic cell death, whereas robust activation of PARP-1 has been shown to promote a necrotic cell death associated with energetic collapse. Here we identify a novel role for p53 in modulating PARP enzymatic activity to regulate necrotic cell death. In mouse embryonic fibroblasts, human colorectal and human breast cancer cell lines, loss of p53 function promotes resistance to necrotic, PARP-mediated cell death. We therefore demonstrate that p53 can regulate both necrotic and apoptotic cell death, mutations or deletions in this tumor-suppressor protein may be selected by cancer cells to provide not only their resistance to apoptosis but also to necrosis, and explain resistance to chemotherapy and radiation even when it kills via non-apoptotic mechanisms.     

Decision making of the p53 network: Death by integration

The tumor suppressor protein p53 plays a central role in the multiple response pathways activated by DNA damage. In particular, p53 is involved in both the pro-survival response of cell cycle arrest and DNA repair, and the pro-death response of apoptosis. How does the p53 network coordinate the different pathways that lead to the opposite cell fates and what is its strategy in making the life-death decisions? To address these questions, we develop an integrated mathematical model that embraces three key modules of the p53 network: p53 core regulation, p53-induced cell cycle arrest and p53-dependent apoptosis initiation. Our analyses reveal that different aspects of the nuclear p53 dynamic profile are being used to differentially regulate the pro-survival and the pro-death modules. While the activation of the pro-survival module is dependent on the current or recent status of the DNA damage, the activation of the pro-death module relies on the accumulation or integration of the damage level over time. Thus, the cell will take the death fate if it cannot recover from the damage within a time period that is inversely proportional to the damage level. This “adaptive timer” strategy is likely to be adopted in other stress response systems.     

A plausible model for bimodal p53 switch in DNA damage response

p53 is a tumor suppressor and the p53 dynamics displays stimulus dependent patterns. Recent evidence suggests a bimodal p53 switch in cell fate decision. However, no theoretical studies have been proposed to investigate bimodal p53 induction. Here we constructed a model and showed that MDM2–p53 mRNA binding might contribute to bimodal p53 switch through an intrinsic positive feedback loop. Lower damage favored pulsing while monotonic increasing was generated with higher damage. Bimodal p53 dynamics was largely influenced by cellular MDM2 and elevated p53/MDM2 ratios with increasing etoposide favor mono-ubiquitination. Our model replicated recent experiments and provided potential insights into dynamic mechanisms of bimodal switch.     

miR-155 通过p53/p21 调控前列腺癌细胞周期

目的:探讨miR-155对前列腺癌细胞周期的影响及其分子机制。方法:通过转染anti-miR-155抑制前列腺癌DU145和PC-3细胞中miR-155水平后,采用流式细胞术观察细胞周期的变化,western blot和RT-PCR观察p53和p21蛋白及CDK2和cyclin蛋白和m RNA表达的变化。结果:与对照组相比,DU145和PC-3细胞转染anti-miR-155后,G2/M期细胞阻滞,S期细胞数比例显著增加(P0.05),p53和p21蛋白和m RNA表达水平显著增加(P0.01),CDK2和cyclin E蛋白和m RNA表达均显著降低(P0.01)。结论:miR-155可影响人前列腺癌细胞的周期,可能与其调节p53、p21及其下游的CDK2和cyclin E的表达相关。     

Cell Fate Regulation upon DNA Damage: p53 Serine 46 Kinases Pave the Cell Death Road

Mild and massive DNA damage are differentially integrated into the cellular signaling networks and, in consequence, provoke different cell fate decisions. After mild damage, the tumor suppressor p53 directs the cellular response to cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and cell survival, whereas upon severe damage, p53 drives the cell death response. One posttranslational modification of p53, phosphorylation at Serine 46, selectively occurs after severe DNA damage and is envisioned as a marker of the cell death response. However, the molecular mechanism of action of the p53 Ser46 phospho‐isomer, the molecular timing of this phosphorylation event, and its activating effects on apoptosis and ferroptosis still await exploration. In this essay, the current body of evidence on the molecular function of this deadly p53 mark, its evolutionary conservation, and the regulation of the key players of this response, the p53 Serine 46 kinases, are reviewed and dissected.     

ATM regulates cell fate choice upon p53 activation by modulating mitochondrial turnover and ROS levels

Despite extensive study, the mechanisms of cell fate choice upon p53 activation remain poorly understood. Using genome-wide shRNA screening, we recently identified the ATM kinase as synthetic lethal with Nutlin-3, an MDM2 inhibitor that leads to non-genotoxic p53 activation. Here, we demonstrate that while this synthetic lethal interaction relies upon components of both the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways (e.g., BAX and BID), it is not due to significant ATM effects on the expression of p53 target genes. Instead, loss of ATM activity results in increased mitochondria and reactive oxygen species that drive apoptosis. Finally, we provide evidence that pharmacologic inhibition of ATM blocks autophagy in direct opposition to p53, which activates this process, and that inhibition of autophagy is sufficient to elicit an apoptotic response when combined with Nutlin-3.     

ATM regulates cell fate choice upon p53 activation by modulating mitochondrial turnover and ROS levels

Despite extensive study, the mechanisms of cell fate choice upon p53 activation remain poorly understood. Using genome-wide shRNA screening, we recently identified the ATM kinase as synthetic lethal with Nutlin-3, an MDM2 inhibitor that leads to non-genotoxic p53 activation. Here, we demonstrate that while this synthetic lethal interaction relies upon components of both the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways (e.g., BAX and BID), it is not due to significant ATM effects on the expression of p53 target genes. Instead, loss of ATM activity results in increased mitochondria and reactive oxygen species that drive apoptosis. Finally, we provide evidence that pharmacologic inhibition of ATM blocks autophagy in direct opposition to p53, which activates this process, and that inhibition of autophagy is sufficient to elicit an apoptotic response when combined with Nutlin-3.