植物组蛋白变体生物学功能

组蛋白变体是重要的表观遗传调控因子,能够在染色质特定位置替换常规组蛋白,维持染色质结构进而保证转录激活或抑制的顺利进行.目前,组蛋白变体的调控功能已成为植物学研究领域的一个热点.近年来,随着植物组蛋白变体生物学功能研究的不断深入,发现组蛋白变体能够在植物生长发育和环境应答调控等多个生物学过程中发挥重要作用.该文简要介绍...     

The right place at the right time: chaperoning core histone variants

Histone proteins dynamically regulate chromatin structure and epigenetic signaling to maintain cell homeostasis. These processes require controlled spatial and temporal deposition and eviction of histones by their dedicated chaperones. With the evolution of histone variants, a network of functionally specific histone chaperones has emerged. Molecular details of the determinants of chaperone specificity for different histone variants are only slowly being resolved. A complete understanding of these processes is essential to shed light on the genuine biological roles of histone variants, their chaperones, and their impact on chromatin dynamics.     

Assembly and disassembly of nucleosome core particles containing histone variants by human nucleosome assembly protein I

Histone variants play important roles in the maintenance and regulation of the chromatin structure. In order to characterize the biochemical properties of the chromatin structure containing histone variants, we investigated the dynamic status of nucleosome core particles (NCPs) that were assembled with recombinant histones. We found that in the presence of nucleosome assembly protein I (NAP-I), a histone chaperone, H2A-Barr body deficient (H2A.Bbd) confers the most flexible nucleosome structure among the mammalian histone H2A variants known thus far. NAP-I mediated the efficient assembly and disassembly of the H2A.Bbd-H2B dimers from NCPs. This reaction was accomplished more efficiently when the NCPs contained H3.3, a histone H3 variant known to be localized in the active chromatin, than when the NCPs contained the canonical H3. These observations indicate that the histone variants H2A.Bbd and H3.3 are involved in the formation and maintenance of the active chromatin structure. We also observed that acidic histone binding proteins, TAF-I/SET and B23.1, demonstrated dimer assembly and disassembly activity, but the efficiency of their activity was considerably lower than that of NAP-I. Thus, both the acidic nature of NAP-I and its other functional structure(s) may be essential to mediate the assembly and disassembly of the dimers in NCPs.     

Histones in functional diversification. Core histone variants

Recent research suggests that minor changes in the primary sequence of the conserved histones may become major determinants for the chromatin structure regulating gene expression and other DNA-related processes. An analysis of the involvement of different core histone variants in different nuclear processes and the structure of different variant nucleosome cores shows that this may indeed be so. Histone variants may also be involved in demarcating functional regions of the chromatin. We discuss in this review why two of the four core histones show higher variation. A comparison of the status of variants in yeast with those from higher eukaryotes suggests that histone variants have evolved in synchrony with functional requirement of the cell.     

A haploid affair: core histone transitions during spermatogenesis.

The process of meiosis reduces a diploid cell to four haploid gametes and is accompanied by extensive recombination. Thus, the dynamics of chromatin during meiosis are significantly different than in mitotic cells. As spermatogenesis progresses, there is a widespread reorganization of the haploid genome followed by extensive DNA compaction. It has become increasingly clear that the dynamic composition of chromatin plays a critical role in the activities of enzymes and processes that act upon it. Therefore, an analysis of the role of histone variants and modifications in these processes may shed light upon the mechanisms involved and the control of chromatin structure in general. Histone variants such as histone H3.3, H2AX, and macroH2A appear to play key roles in the various stages of spermiogenesis, in addition to the specifically modulated acetylation of histone H4 (acH4), ubiquitination of histones H2A and H2B (uH2A, uH2B), and phosphorylation of histone H3 (H3p). This review will examine recent discoveries concerning the role of histone modifications and variants during meiosis and spermatogenesis.     

Lessons from senescence: Chromatin maintenance in non-proliferating cells

Cellular senescence is an irreversible proliferation arrest, thought to contribute to tumor suppression, proper wound healing and, perhaps, tissue and organismal aging. Two classical tumor suppressors, p53 and pRB, control cell cycle arrest associated with senescence. Profound molecular changes occur in cells undergoing senescence. At the level of chromatin, for example, senescence associated heterochromatic foci (SAHF) form in some cell types. Chromatin is inherently dynamic and likely needs to be actively maintained to achieve a stable cell phenotype. In proliferating cells chromatin is maintained in conjunction with DNA replication, but how non-proliferating cells maintain chromatin structure is poorly understood. Some histone variants, such as H3.3 and macroH2A increase as cells undergo senescence, suggesting histone variants and their associated chaperones could be important in chromatin structure maintenance in senescent cells. Here, we discuss options available for senescent cells to maintain chromatin structure and the relative contribution of histone variants and chaperones in this process. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Histone chaperones and chromatin assembly.     

Epigenetic control of plant immunity

In eukaryotic genomes, gene expression and DNA recombination are affected by structural chromatin traits. Chromatin structure is shaped by the activity of enzymes that either introduce covalent modifications in DNA and histone proteins or use energy from ATP to disrupt histone–DNA interactions. The genomic ‘marks’ that are generated by covalent modifications of histones and DNA, or by the deposition of histone variants, are susceptible to being altered in response to stress. Recent evidence has suggested that proteins generating these epigenetic marks play crucial roles in the defence against pathogens. Histone deacetylases are involved in the activation of jasmonic acid‐ and ethylene‐sensitive defence mechanisms. ATP‐dependent chromatin remodellers mediate the constitutive repression of the salicylic acid‐dependent pathway, whereas histone methylation at the WRKY70 gene promoter affects the activation of this pathway. Interestingly, bacterial‐infected tissues show a net reduction in DNA methylation, which may affect the disease resistance genes responsible for the surveillance against pathogens. As some epigenetic marks can be erased or maintained and transmitted to offspring, epigenetic mechanisms may provide plasticity for the dynamic control of emerging pathogens without the generation of genomic lesions.     

Testis-specific histone H3 expression in somatic cells

Histone variants functionally differentiate individual nucleosomes and, hence, act as key regulators of chromatin structure and function. Large-scale proteomic projects are now valuable sources of histone-variant discovery, showing, in particular, that somatic mammalian cells express a larger panel of histone H3 variants than previously thought, including testis-specific variants and as yet uncharacterized species. These data also suggest a tight relationship between the complexity of histone-variant expression and physiopathological states of the cells.     

Differential Histone Acetylation in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa) Due to Growth in NaCl : Responses in Salt Stressed and Salt Tolerant Callus Cultures

The steady state distribution of histone variant proteins and their modifications by acetylation were characterized in wild type and salinity stress adapted alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Isotopic labeling detected dynamic acetylation at four sites in the histone H3 variants and five sites in histones H4 and H2B. Histone variant H3.2 was the most highly acetylated histone with 25% higher steady state acetylation and a two- to threefold higher acetylation labeling than histone H3.1. Histone phosphorylation was limited to histone variants H1.A, H1.B, and H1.C and to histone H2A.3, which was also acetylated. Histone variant composition was unaffected by cellular exposure to NaCl. Histone acetylation was qualitatively similar in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive cells under normal growth conditions. However, short term salt stress in salt sensitive cells or continued growth at 1% NaCl in salt tolerant cells led to major increases in the multiacetylated forms of histone H4 and the two variants of histone H3. These changes were more pronounced in the diploid than in the tetraploid alfalfa strains. The increase in multiacetylation of core histones serves as an in vivo reporter suggesting an altered intranuclear ionic environment in the presence of salt. It may also represent an adaptive response in chromatin structure to permit chromatin function in a more saline intranuclear environment.     

Network of dynamic interactions between histone H1 and high-mobility-group proteins in chromatin

Histone H1 and the high-mobility group (HMG) proteins are chromatin binding proteins that regulate gene expression by modulating the compactness of the chromatin fiber and affecting the ability of regulatory factors to access their nucleosomal targets. Histone H1 stabilizes the higher-order chromatin structure and decreases nucleosomal access, while the HMG proteins decrease the compactness of the chromatin fiber and enhance the accessibility of chromatin targets to regulatory factors. Here we show that in living cells, each of the three families of HMG proteins weakens the binding of H1 to nucleosomes by dynamically competing for chromatin binding sites. The HMG families weaken H1 binding synergistically and do not compete among each other, suggesting that they affect distinct H1 binding sites. We suggest that a network of dynamic and competitive interactions involving HMG proteins and H1, and perhaps other structural proteins, constantly modulates nucleosome accessibility and the local structure of the chromatin fiber.