The Mre11 Complex and the Response to Dysfunctional Telomeres

In this study, we examine the telomeric functions of the mammalian Mre11 complex by using hypomorphic Mre11 and Nbs1 mutants (Mre11^ATLD1/ATLD1 and Nbs1^ΔB/ΔB, respectively). No telomere shortening was observed in Mre11^ATLD1/ATLD1 cells after extensive passage through culture, and the rate of telomere shortening in telomerase-deficient (Tert^Δ/Δ) Mre11^ATLD1/ATLD1 cells was the same as that in Tert^Δ/Δ alone. Although telomeres from late-passage Mre11^ATLD1/ATLD1 Tert^Δ/Δ cells were as short as those from Tert^Δ/Δ, the incidence of telomere fusions was reduced. This effect on fusions was also evident upon acute telomere dysfunction in Mre11^ATLD1/ATLD1 and Nbs1^ΔB/ΔB cells rendered Trf2 deficient by cre-mediated TRF2 inactivation than in wild-type cells. The residual fusions formed in Mre11 complex mutant cells exhibited a strong tendency toward chromatid fusions, with an almost complete bias for fusion of telomeres replicated by the leading strand. Finally, the response to acute telomere dysfunction was strongly impaired by Mre11 complex hypomorphism, as the formation of telomere dysfunction-induced DNA damage foci was reduced in both cre-infected Mre11^ATLD1/ATLD1 Trf2^F/Δ and Nbs1^ΔB/ΔB Trf2^F/F cells. These data indicate that the Mre11 complex influences the cellular response to telomere dysfunction, reminiscent of its influence on the response to interstitial DNA breaks, and suggest that it may promote telomeric DNA end processing during DNA replication.The Mre11 complex (in mammals, Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1) plays a central role in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The Mre11 complex acts as a DSB sensor, promoting the activation of ATM-dependent DNA damage signaling pathways, DNA repair, and apoptosis. In addition, the complex plays a direct role in recombinational DNA repair, influencing both homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) (39). The Mre11 complex''s diverse functions in the DNA damage response are likely predicated on its physical association with chromatin. In this regard, one of the least-understood roles of the Mre11 complex in mammals is its association with telomeres.In mammals, telomeric DNA consists of double-stranded TTAGGG repeats ending in a single-stranded 3′ G overhang, and an array of telomere binding proteins called the shelterin complex that function to prevent telomeres from being recognized as DNA breaks (33). DNA of the overhang invades the double-stranded telomeric repeat sequence to form a t-loop structure (14, 32). The formation of the t-loop requires the telomere protection and remodeling proteins that make up the shelterin complex (7), and these may also contribute to telomere length regulation by preventing telomerase access to chromosomal ends.Data regarding the role of the Mre11 complex at the telomere have implicated the Mre11 complex in several aspects of telomere maintenance and function. For example, it has been suggested that the Mre11 complex may promote formation of the 3′ telomeric overhang by influencing 5′-to-3′ resection of newly replicated chromosome ends (6). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the Mre11 complex recruits the ATM orthologue, Tel1, which is in turn required to recruit telomerase (12, 45). Consequently, Mre11 complex deficiency results in telomere shortening. In mammals, recruitment of telomerase is thought to be regulated primarily by the telomeric protein components TRF1, TPP1, and POT1 (24, 46, 53). However, telomere shortening has also been noted to occur in cell lines from Nijmegen breakage syndrome (NBS) patients in which a hypomorphic Nbs1 allele is expressed, leading to the suggestion that the Mre11 complex may also promote telomerase function in mammals (36). The Mre11 complex associates with telomeres through its interaction with the shelterin component Trf2, apparently in a cell cycle-dependent manner (47, 54). The significance of this physical association is unclear, as genetic depletion of Rad50, a component of the Mre11 complex, does not phenocopy depletion of Trf2 in most respects (1).To examine the function of the Mre11 complex at mammalian telomeres, we established mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from a mouse expressing the hypomorphic Mre11^ATLD1 allele, crossed to telomerase deficient Tert^Δ/Δ mice (23, 42), and assessed the rate of telomere shortening. Mre11 complex hypomorphism in MEFs did not affect telomere length, irrespective of telomerase status. In Mre11^ATLD1/ATLD1 Tert^Δ/Δ cells, the fusion of eroded telomeres was reduced compared to Tert^Δ/Δ cells with telomeres shortened to the same extent, suggesting that the Mre11 complex is involved in the response to critically short telomeres. This interpretation was supported by data obtained using a conditional Trf2 allele to generate acute telomere dysfunction in Mre11^ATLD1/ATLD1 and Nbs1^ΔB/ΔB cells. Collectively the data support a role for the Mre11 complex in the recognition and signaling of dysfunctional telomeres. The character of fusions arising in cre-infected Mre11^ATLD1/ATLD1 Trf2^F/Δ and Nbs1^ΔB/ΔB Trf2^F/F cells further suggests that the Mre11 complex may influence the processing of chromosome ends following DNA replication en route to t-loop formation.     

Mre11 Nuclease Activity and Ctp1 Regulate Chk1 Activation by Rad3ATR and Tel1ATM Checkpoint Kinases at Double-Strand Breaks

Rad3, the Schizosaccharomyces pombe ortholog of human ATR and Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mec1, activates the checkpoint kinase Chk1 in response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Rad3^ATR/Mec1 associates with replication protein A (RPA), which binds single-stranded DNA overhangs formed by DSB resection. In humans and both yeasts, DSBs are initially detected and processed by the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1^Xrs2 (MRN) nucleolytic protein complex in association with the Tel1^ATM checkpoint kinase and the Ctp1^CtIP/Sae2 DNA-end processing factor; however, in budding yeast, neither Mre11 nuclease activity or Sae2 are required for Mec1 signaling at irreparable DSBs. Here, we investigate the relationship between DNA end processing and the DSB checkpoint response in fission yeast, and we report that Mre11 nuclease activity and Ctp1 are critical for efficient Rad3-to-Chk1 signaling. Moreover, deleting Ctp1 reveals a Tel1-to-Chk1 signaling pathway that bypasses Rad3. This pathway requires Mre11 nuclease activity, the Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) checkpoint clamp complex, and Crb2 checkpoint mediator. Ctp1 negatively regulates this pathway by controlling MRN residency at DSBs. A Tel1-to-Chk1 checkpoint pathway acting at unresected DSBs provides a mechanism for coupling Chk1 activation to the initial detection of DSBs and suggests that ATM may activate Chk1 by both direct and indirect mechanisms in mammalian cells.DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), formed by clastogens or from endogenous damage, trigger multiple cellular responses that are critical for maintaining genome integrity. Of particular importance is the cell cycle checkpoint that restrains the onset of mitosis while DSB repair is under way. Chk1 is the critical effector of this checkpoint in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and mammalian cells, whereas the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae uses both Chk1 and Rad53 (orthologous to human Chk2 and fission yeast Cds1) to delay anaphase entry and mitotic exit. These kinases are regulated by ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated) and ATR (ATM and Rad3-related) checkpoint kinases (5). Curiously, the regulatory connections between ATM/ATR and Chk1/Chk2 orthologs are not strictly conserved between species (Fig. ​(Fig.1A).1A). In mammals, ATM activates Chk2 while ATR activates Chk1. In S. cerevisiae and S. pombe, ATR orthologs (Mec1 and Rad3, respectively) activate Chk2 orthologs and Chk1, while Tel1 (ATM ortholog) is primarily involved in telomere maintenance (14, 38, 40).Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Deletion of Ctp1 restores the DNA damage checkpoint in rad3Δ cells. (A) Regulatory connections between ATM/ATR and Chk1/Chk2 orthologs in mammals, S. cerevisiae, and S. pombe. ATM phosphorylates Chk2 and ATR phosphorylates Chk1. CtIP mediates an ATM-to-ATR switch through DNA end resection in mammals (44, 53). ATM promotes Chk1 activation by stimulating CtIP-dependent resection through an unknown mechanism. In S. cerevisiae, Mec1 phosphorylates both Rad53 and Chk1. Deleting Sae2 uncovers a Tel1-to-Rad53 signaling pathway and enhances Rad53 activation (47). In S. pombe, Cds1 and Chk1 activation is dependent on Rad3. (B) Chk1 phosphorylation peaks in wild-type (wt) (top panel) and ctp1Δ cells (bottom panel) 30 min after exposure to 90 Gy of IR in log-phase cultures. Chk1 phosphorylation in ctp1Δ cells prior to IR exposure likely arises from an inability to repair spontaneous DNA damage (23). Immunoblots were probed for the HA epitope-tagged Chk1 or Cdc2 as a loading control. (C) Chk1 phosphorylation is reduced at least 2-fold in ctp1Δ cells relative to the wild type. Quantification of blots from panel B expressed as a ratio of phospho-Chk1 (upper band) versus nonphospho-Chk1 (lower band) was performed. The phospho-Chk1 signal in untreated ctp1Δ cells was subtracted from the IR-treated samples to more accurately measure the IR-induced phosphorylation. (D) The ctp1Δ mutation restores Chk1 phosphorylation in rad3Δ cells. Cells were harvested immediately after mock or 90-Gy IR treatment and blotted for HA epitope tag. Ponceau staining shows equal loading. (E) Quantitation of Chk1 phosphorylation. Error bars represent the standard errors from three independent experiments. (F) The checkpoint arrest is restored in ctp1Δ rad3Δ cells. Cells synchronized in G₂ by elutriation were mock treated or exposed to 100 Gy of IR. Cell cycle progression was tracked by microscopic observation.The functions of ATM and ATR orthologs are intimately tied to the detection and nucleolytic processing of DSBs. ATM^Tel1 localizes at DSBs by interacting with Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1^Xrs2 (MRN) protein complex, which directly binds DNA ends (12, 20, 24, 50, 52). The MRN complex is essential for ATM^Tel1 function in all species. The Mre11 subunit of MRN complex has DNase activities that are critical for radioresistance in S. pombe and mice but not in budding yeast (3, 19, 22, 50). In fission yeast, MRN complex also recruits Ctp1 DNA end-processing factor to DSBs (25, 49). Ctp1 is structurally and functionally related to CtIP in mammals and Sae2 in budding yeast, the latter of which has nuclease activity in vitro (21, 23, 43). Ctp1 and CtIP are essential for survival of ionizing radiation and other clastogens (23, 43, 54), whereas sae2Δ mutants are not radiosensitive except at very high doses of ionizing radiation (IR), although both Ctp1 and Sae2 are required for repair of meiotic DSBs formed by a Spo11/Rec12-dependent mechanism (17, 23, 36). Genetic and biochemical studies indicate that Sae2/Ctp1/CtIP collaborate with MRN complex to initiate the 5′-to-3′ resection of DSBs (7, 23, 28, 43, 53, 55), which leads to the generation of 3′ single-strand overhangs (SSOs) that are critical for DSB repair by homologous recombination (HR). Replication protein A (RPA) binding to SSOs is essential for HR repair of DSBs, but it is also important for recruiting ATR^Rad3/Mec1, which interacts with RPA through its regulatory subunit ATRIP (Rad26 in fission yeast, Ddc2 in budding yeast) (5, 56). Subsequent phosphorylation of Chk1 by ATR also requires the Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) checkpoint clamp, which is loaded at the single-strand/double-strand DNA junctions (26, 48, 57), the ATR activating protein TopBP1 (Cut5 in fission yeast), and a checkpoint mediator protein such as Crb2 in fission yeast (34, 41, 48).In this mechanism of DNA damage checkpoint signaling, DNA end resection is critical for ATR (Rad3/Mec1) activation, and therefore resection defective mutants should be unable to mount a fully active checkpoint response (44). However, Rad53 activation is not diminished in budding yeast sae2Δ mutants that suffer an irreparable DSB by expressing HO endonuclease. In fact, there is a defect in turning off the checkpoint signal (6). A similar effect is observed in S. cerevisiae strains expressing the mre11-H125N nuclease-defective form of Mre11. Moreover, overexpression of SAE2 strongly inhibits Rad53 activation (6). The reasons for these phenotypes are unknown, since neither Sae2 nor Mre11 nuclease activity are required for DSB resection or radioresistance. However, deleting Sae2 delays resection while at the same time enhancing a cryptic Tel1-to-Rad53 checkpoint pathway (6, 47). These effects correlate with delayed disassembly of Mre11 foci at DSBs in sae2Δ cells, suggesting that Sae2 may negatively regulate checkpoint signaling by modulating Mre11 association at damaged DNA (1, 6, 24). Enhancement of a Tel1-to-Rad53 checkpoint pathway by eliminating Sae2 suggests that the signaling pathways between ATM/ATR and Chk1/Chk2 checkpoint kinases are not hard wired but are adaptable to changes in DNA end processing (47). However, as yet there is no evidence that ATM^Tel1 can activate Chk1 in any organism.Since SAE2 deletion or overexpression has unexpected effects on Rad53 activation in budding yeast, we decided to explore the relationship between Ctp1 and Chk1 activation in fission yeast. Here, we show that Chk1 activation is substantially diminished in ctp1Δ cells exposed to ionizing radiation. These data are consistent with studies showing that CtIP is required for efficient Chk1 activation in mammalian cells treated with camptothecin (CPT), a topoisomerase I poison that causes replication fork collapse (43, 53). We also investigate the role of Mre11 nuclease activity and find that while ablating Mre11 nuclease activity enhances Rad53 activation in budding yeast, the equivalent Mre11 mutation in fission yeast severely impairs Chk1 activation by ionizing radiation. Furthermore, we find that deleting Ctp1 reveals a previously unknown Tel1-to-Chk1 signaling pathway in S. pombe, a finding analogous to the enhancement of a Tel1-to-Rad53 checkpoint pathway by eliminating Sae2 in S. cerevisiae (47). This Tel1-to-Chk1 pathway also requires Mre11 nuclease activity. These data establish that Tel1^ATM can activate Chk1 independently of Rad3^ATR, which has implications for studies linking ATM to Chk1 activation in mammalian cells (16, 31). Characterization of this pathway allows us to propose a more detailed model of how Chk1 is activated in response to DSBs.     

Rad50 Is Dispensable for the Maintenance and Viability of Postmitotic Tissues

The majority of spontaneous chromosome breakage occurs during the process of DNA replication. Homologous recombination is the primary mechanism of repair of such damage, which probably accounts for the fact that it is essential for genome integrity and viability in mammalian cells. The Mre11 complex plays diverse roles in the maintenance of genomic integrity, influencing homologous recombination, checkpoint activation, and telomere maintenance. The complex is essential for cellular viability, but given its myriad influences on genomic integrity, the mechanistic basis for the nonviability of Mre11 complex-deficient cells has not been defined. In this study we generated mice carrying a conditional allele of Rad50 and examined the effects of Rad50 deficiency in proliferative and nonproliferative settings. Depletion of Rad50 in cultured cells caused extensive DNA damage and death within 3 to 5 days of Rad50 deletion. This was not associated with gross telomere dysfunction, suggesting that the telomeric functions of the Mre11 complex are not required for viability. Rad50 was also dispensable for the viability of quiescent liver and postmitotic Purkinje cells of the cerebellum. These findings support the idea that the essential functions of the Mre11 complex are associated with DNA replication and further suggest that homologous recombination is not essential in nondividing cells.The Mre11 complex regulates both DNA damage checkpoint function and repair. Its checkpoint functions appear to be primarily related to its role as a DNA double-strand break (DSB) sensor which binds DNA damage and activates ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia [AT] mutated). The ATM kinase transduces the damage signal via phosphorylating mediators of the damage response (30, 42), which promotes cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and apoptosis. Mre11 complex functions are compromised in the human chromosome instability syndromes Nijmegen breakage syndrome and AT-like disorder, which are caused by hypomorphic mutations in Nbs1 and Mre11. Cells derived from patients and from mouse models of these diseases exhibit spontaneous DNA damage, ionizing radiation (IR) sensitivity, and checkpoint defects (25, 27, 48, 52, 57).The complex''s primary role in DNA repair is in recombinational DSB repair, and this role likely underlies its essential nature. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the complex governs homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) (19), whereas in vertebrate systems it primarily functions in HR (51, 61, 62). In fact, studies of Nbs1-deficient cells suggest that the Mre11 complex may inhibit NHEJ in mammals (62). Data from several species also implicate the Mre11 nuclease in the metabolism of topoisomerase adducts (40, 43, 49). This highly conserved function could also explain why the Mre11 complex is essential.The Mre11 complex''s function at telomeres may also be required for viability. Telomeres protect the ends of linear chromosomes from being recognized as DSBs and thereby activating the DNA damage response (DDR) (9). In S. cerevisiae the Mre11 complex influences telomere length maintenance (5, 28), whereas in mammals the complex interacts with the telomere binding protein Trf2 and localizes to telomeres (63). Loss of Trf2 results in telomere uncapping, causing activation of the DDR, telomere fusions, and senescence (7). Given the association of Mre11 with Trf2, it is conceivable that acute Mre11 complex deficiency in the mouse would phenocopy Trf2 loss and similarly lead to cell death as a result of telomere uncapping.Conclusions regarding the essential nature of HR in general (33, 47, 53) and the Mre11 complex specifically (10, 17, 45, 59, 62) have been derived from the analysis of proliferating cells in vitro or in vivo. The coincidence of DNA replication and the formation of spontaneous DSBs prompted us to test whether the Mre11 complex and, by extension, HR would be essential in quiescent or postmitotic tissues in which the frequency of spontaneous DSBs is significantly reduced. To examine this issue, we generated mice containing a conditional Rad50 allele in which the Rad50 gene could be inactivated in quiescent and postmitotic cells.Our results indicate that Rad50 is not required for homeostasis or viability of quiescent hepatocytes of the adult liver; nor does it appear to be required for maintenance of postmitotic Purkinje cells of the cerebellum. In contrast, Rad50 was required for viability of proliferating tissue culture and bone marrow cells. Rad50-deficient hepatocytes that were induced to divide via hepatectomy were able to achieve limited division and survived despite the presence of DNA damage that persisted long after the bulk of regeneration was complete. Rad50-deficient cells did not exhibit overtly dysfunctional telomeres, suggesting that their loss of viability was not due to acute telomere failure. These data indicate that the Mre11 complex and, by extension, HR may be dispensable in postmitotic cells and are consistent with the interpretation that the replication-associated functions of the Mre11 complex account for its essential nature.     

Cell Cycle-Dependent Role of MRN at Dysfunctional Telomeres: ATM Signaling-Dependent Induction of Nonhomologous End Joining (NHEJ) in G1 and Resection-Mediated Inhibition of NHEJ in G2

Here, we address the role of the MRN (Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1) complex in the response to telomeres rendered dysfunctional by deletion of the shelterin component TRF2. Using conditional NBS1/TRF2 double-knockout MEFs, we show that MRN is required for ATM signaling in response to telomere dysfunction. This establishes that MRN is the only sensor for the ATM kinase and suggests that TRF2 might block ATM signaling by interfering with MRN binding to the telomere terminus, possibly by sequestering the telomere end in the t-loop structure. We also examined the role of the MRN/ATM pathway in nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) of damaged telomeres. NBS1 deficiency abrogated the telomere fusions that occur in G₁, consistent with the requirement for ATM and its target 53BP1 in this setting. Interestingly, NBS1 and ATM, but not H2AX, repressed NHEJ at dysfunctional telomeres in G₂, specifically at telomeres generated by leading-strand DNA synthesis. Leading-strand telomere ends were not prone to fuse in the absence of either TRF2 or MRN/ATM, indicating redundancy in their protection. We propose that MRN represses NHEJ by promoting the generation of a 3′ overhang after completion of leading-strand DNA synthesis. TRF2 may ensure overhang formation by recruiting MRN (and other nucleases) to newly generated telomere ends. The activation of the MRN/ATM pathway by the dysfunctional telomeres is proposed to induce resection that protects the leading-strand ends from NHEJ when TRF2 is absent. Thus, the role of MRN at dysfunctional telomeres is multifaceted, involving both repression of NHEJ in G₂ through end resection and induction of NHEJ in G₁ through ATM-dependent signaling.Mammalian telomeres solve the end protection problem through their association with shelterin. The shelterin factor TRF2 (telomere repeat-binding factor 2) protects chromosome ends from inappropriate DNA repair events that threaten the integrity of the genome (reviewed in reference 32). When TRF2 is removed by Cre-mediated deletion from conditional knockout mouse embryo fibroblasts (TRF2^F/− MEFs), telomeres activate the ATM kinase pathway and are processed by the canonical nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway to generate chromosome end-to-end fusions (10, 11).The repair of telomeres in TRF2-deficient cells is readily monitored in metaphase spreads. Over the course of four or five cell divisions, the majority of chromosome ends become fused, resulting in metaphase spreads displaying the typical pattern of long trains of joined chromosomes (10). The reproducible pace and the efficiency of telomere NHEJ have allowed the study of factors involved in its execution and regulation. In addition to depending on the NHEJ factors Ku70 and DNA ligase IV (10, 11), telomere fusions are facilitated by the ATM kinase (26). This aspect of telomere NHEJ is mediated through the ATM kinase target 53BP1. 53BP1 accumulates at telomeres in TRF2-depleted cells and stimulates chromatin mobility, thereby promoting the juxtaposition of distantly positioned chromosome ends prior to their fusion (18). Telomere NHEJ is also accelerated by the ATM phosphorylation target MDC1, which is required for the prolonged association of 53BP1 at sites of DNA damage (19).Although loss of TRF2 leads to telomere deprotection at all stages of the cell cycle, NHEJ of uncapped telomeres takes place primarily before their replication in G₁ (25). Postreplicative (G₂) telomere fusions can occur at a low frequency upon TRF2 deletion, but only when cyclin-dependent kinase activity is inhibited with roscovitine (25). The target of Cdk1 in this setting is not known.Here, we dissect the role of the MRN (Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1) complex and H2AX at telomeres rendered dysfunctional through deletion of TRF2. The highly conserved MRN complex has been proposed to function as the double-stranded break (DSB) sensor in the ATM pathway (reviewed in references 34 and 35). In support of this model, Mre11 interacts directly with DNA ends via two carboxy-terminal DNA binding domains (13, 14); the recruitment of MRN to sites of damage is independent of ATM signaling, as it occurs in the presence of the phosphoinositide-3-kinase-related protein kinase inhibitor caffeine (29, 44); in vitro analysis has demonstrated that MRN is required for activation of ATM by linear DNAs (27); a mutant form of Rad50 (Rad50S) can induce ATM signaling in the absence of DNA damage (31); and phosphorylation of ATM targets in response to ionizing radiation is completely abrogated upon deletion of NBS1 from MEFs (17). These data and the striking similarities between syndromes caused by mutations in ATM, Nbs1, and Mre11 (ataxia telangiectasia, Nijmegen breakage syndrome, and ataxia telangiectasia-like disease, respectively) are consistent with a sensor function for MRN.MRN has also been implicated in several aspects of DNA repair. Potentially relevant to DNA repair events, Mre11 dimers can bridge and align the two DNA ends in vitro (49) and Rad50 may promote long-range tethering of sister chromatids (24, 50). In addition, a binding partner of the MRN complex, CtIP, has been implicated in end resection of DNA ends during homology-directed repair (39, 45). The role of MRN in NHEJ has been much less clear. MRX, the yeast orthologue of MRN, functions during NHEJ in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (28, 30). In mammalian cells, MRN is not recruited to I-SceI-induced DSBs in G₁, whereas Ku70 is, and MRN does not appear to be required for NHEJ-mediated repair of these DSBs (38, 54). On the other hand, MRN promotes class switch recombination (37) and has been implicated in accurate NHEJ repair during V(D)J recombination (22).The involvement of MRN in ATM signaling and DNA repair pathways has been intriguing from the perspective of telomere biology. While several of the attributes of MRN might be considered a threat to telomere integrity, MRN is known to associate with mammalian telomeres, most likely through an interaction with the TRF2 complex (48, 51, 57). MRN has been implicated in the generation of the telomeric overhang (12), the telomerase pathway (36, 52), the ALT pathway (55), and the protection of telomeres from stochastic deletion events (1). It has also been speculated that MRN may contribute to formation of the t-loop structure (16). t-loops, the lariats formed through the strand invasion of the telomere terminus into the duplex telomeric DNA (21), are thought to contribute to telomere protection by effectively shielding the chromosome end from DNA damage response factors that interact with DNA ends, including nucleases, and the Ku heterodimer (15).H2AX has been studied extensively in the context of chromosome-internal DSBs. When a DSB is formed, ATM acts near the lesion to phosphorylate a conserved carboxy-terminal serine of H2AX, a histone variant present throughout the genome (7). Phosphorylated H2AX (referred to as γ-H2AX) promotes the spreading of DNA damage factors over several megabases along the damaged chromatin and mediates the amplification of the DNA damage signal (43). The signal amplification is accomplished through a sequence of phospho-specific interactions among γ-H2AX, MDC1, NBS1, RNF8, and RNF168, which results in the additional binding of ATM and additional phosphorylation of H2AX in adjacent chromatin (reviewed in reference 33). The formation of these large domains of altered chromatin, referred to as irradiation-induced foci at DSBs and telomere dysfunction-induced foci (TIFs) at dysfunctional telomeres (44), promotes the binding of several factors implicated in DNA repair, including the BRCA1 A complex and 53BP1 (33).In agreement with a role for H2AX in DNA repair, H2AX-deficient cells exhibit elevated levels of irradiation-induced chromosome abnormalities (5, 9). In addition, H2AX-null B cells are prone to chromosome breaks and translocations in the immunoglobulin locus, indicative of impaired class switch recombination, a process that involves the repair of DSBs through the NHEJ pathway (9, 20). Since H2AX is dispensable for the activation of irradiation-induced checkpoints (8), these data argue that H2AX contributes directly to DNA repair. However, a different set of studies has concluded that H2AX is not required for NHEJ during V(D)J recombination (5, 9) but that it plays a role in homology-directed repair (53). In this study, we have further queried the contribution of H2AX to NHEJ in the context of dysfunctional telomeres.Our aim was to dissect the contribution of MRN and H2AX to DNA damage signaling and NHEJ-mediated repair in response to telomere dysfunction elicited by deletion of TRF2. Importantly, since ATM is the only kinase activated in this setting, deletion of TRF2 can illuminate the specific contribution of these factors in the absence of the confounding effects of ATR signaling (26). This approach revealed a dual role for MRN at telomeres, involving both its function as a sensor in the ATM pathway and its ability to protect telomeres from NHEJ under certain circumstances.     

Kinase-Independent Functions of TEL1 in Telomere Maintenance

TEL1 is important in Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomere maintenance, and its kinase activity is required. Tel1p associates with telomeres in vivo, is enriched at short telomeres, and enhances the binding of telomerase components to short telomeres. However, it is unclear how the kinase activity and telomere association contribute to Tel1p''s overall function in telomere length maintenance. To investigate this question, we generated a set of single point mutants and a double point mutant (tel1^KD) of Tel1p that were kinase deficient and two Xrs2p mutants that failed to bind Tel1p. Using these separation-of-function alleles in a de novo telomere elongation assay, we found, surprisingly, that the tel1^KD allele and xrs2 C-terminal mutants were both partially functional. Combining the tel1^KD and xrs2 C-terminal mutants had an additive effect and resembled the TEL1 null (tel1Δ) phenotype. These data indicate that Tel1p has two separate functions in telomere maintenance and that the Xrs2p-dependent recruitment of Tel1p to telomeres plays an important role even in the absence of its kinase activity.The telomere is a highly ordered complex of proteins and DNA found at the ends of linear chromosomes that functions to protect the ends and prevents them from being recognized as double-strand DNA breaks (51). Telomeres shorten gradually due to incomplete replication (1, 20), and this shortening is counteracted by telomerase, which elongates telomeres (18, 19).Saccharomyces cerevisiae telomeres are composed of 300 ± 50 bp of the sequence TG_1-3/C_1-3A. The yeast telomerase complex consists of Est2p (catalytic subunit), the RNA component TLC1, and two accessory proteins, Est1p and Est3p (50). Cells deficient for any of these telomerase components undergo progressive telomere shortening and a simultaneous decrease in growth rate, described as senescence (24, 27). Typically, a small fraction of cells, termed survivors, escape senescence and maintain telomere length by utilizing RAD52-dependent recombination (24, 26).In addition to the telomerase complex, a number of yeast proteins are important in maintaining telomere length and integrity. These include Tel1p and Mec1p, the yeast homologues of mammalian ATM and ATR, respectively (39). While deletion of TEL1 results in short but stable telomeres, MEC1 deletion has little effect on average telomere length. However, cells lacking TEL1 that have a mutant mec1-21 allele undergo senescence, similar to telomerase null cells (36), suggesting that MEC1 plays a minor but essential role in telomere length maintenance in tel1Δ cells. It has been shown that the protein kinase activities of Tel1p and Mec1p are essential in telomere maintenance, since tel1^KD cells have short telomeres and tel1Δ mec1^KD cells undergo senescence (29).In current models, Tel1p acts to maintain telomere length by regulating the access of telomerase to short telomeres. TEL1 is required for the association of Est1p and Est2p with telomeres in the late S/G₂ phase of the cell cycle (16), the time when telomeres are elongated (9, 31). Additionally, in both yeast and mammalian cells, telomerase preferentially elongates the shortest telomeres (22, 30, 47). Therefore, TEL1 seems to be required mainly for the association of telomerase to short telomeres in yeast. Indeed, Tel1p preferentially binds to short telomeres (4, 21, 38) and is essential for the increased association of Est1p and Est2p to short telomeres during late S/G₂ (38). However, the kinase activity of Tel1p is not required for the telomere association (21). In addition to its role in telomerase recruitment, TEL1 may also regulate telomere length by enhancing the processivity of telomerase at short telomeres (7).The Mre11p, Rad50p, and Xrs2p (MRX) complex also plays important roles in telomere maintenance. Cells lacking any one of these components (mrxΔ) have short and stable telomeres. Since combining mrxΔ with tel1Δ has no synergistic effect on telomere shortening and mrxΔ mec1Δ cells undergo senescence, it was proposed that the MRX complex and Tel1p function in the same telomere maintenance pathway (37). In agreement with this model, the C-terminal region of Xrs2p is essential in recruiting Tel1p both to double-strand breaks (32) and to short telomeres (38). Interestingly, the mammalian functional homologue of Xrs2p, NBS1, interacts with ATM via its extreme C terminus (13), suggesting that the recruitment of Tel1p to telomeres and the recruitment of ATM to DNA damage sites are conserved.It remains a question what exact roles the kinase activity of Tel1p and its telomere binding play in telomere maintenance. Tel1p''s telomere maintenance function seems to be dependent on its kinase activity, since tel1^KD cells have short telomeres (29). It has been proposed that Tel1p may regulate the recruitment of Est1p, and thus the rest of the telomerase complex (12, 23, 54), to telomeres by phosphorylating Cdc13p (3, 48). Other experiments suggest the association of Tel1p to the telomere plays a major role. The preferential binding of Tel1p to short telomeres is lost in xrs2-664 cells (38), which lack the C-terminal 190 amino acids of Xrs2p and have short telomeres, similar to xrs2Δ (41). It has been suggested that the association of Tel1p to telomeres is required for its substrate phosphorylation and, therefore, telomere length maintenance (3, 39).To further analyze the functions of Tel1p in telomere maintenance, we generated a novel kinase-dead allele of TEL1 and new alleles of XRS2 that do not interact with Tel1p. Through these separation-of-function mutants, we show that both sets of alleles are partially active in a de novo telomere elongation assay. However, combining both the tel1^KD and either of the Tel1p interaction-deficient xrs2 alleles resulted in a phenotype resembling the tel1Δ phenotype, suggesting that Tel1p has kinase-dependent and kinase-independent, but telomere binding-dependent, functions in telomere maintenance.     

Role of Septins in the Orientation of Forespore Membrane Extension during Sporulation in Fission Yeast

During yeast sporulation, a forespore membrane (FSM) initiates at each spindle-pole body and extends to form the spore envelope. We used Schizosaccharomyces pombe to investigate the role of septins during this process. During the prior conjugation of haploid cells, the four vegetatively expressed septins (Spn1, Spn2, Spn3, and Spn4) coassemble at the fusion site and are necessary for its normal morphogenesis. Sporulation involves a different set of four septins (Spn2, Spn5, Spn6, and the atypical Spn7) that does not include the core subunits of the vegetative septin complex. The four sporulation septins form a complex in vitro and colocalize interdependently to a ring-shaped structure along each FSM, and septin mutations result in disoriented FSM extension. The septins and the leading-edge proteins appear to function in parallel to orient FSM extension. Spn2 and Spn7 bind to phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate [PtdIns(4)P] in vitro, and PtdIns(4)P is enriched in the FSMs, suggesting that septins bind to the FSMs via this lipid. Cells expressing a mutant Spn2 protein unable to bind PtdIns(4)P still form extended septin structures, but these structures fail to associate with the FSMs, which are frequently disoriented. Thus, septins appear to form a scaffold that helps to guide the oriented extension of the FSM.Yeast sporulation is a developmental process that involves multiple, sequential events that need to be tightly coordinated (59, 68). In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, when cells of opposite mating type (h⁺ and h⁻) are mixed and shifted to conditions of nitrogen starvation, cell fusion and karyogamy occur to form a diploid zygote, which then undergoes premeiotic DNA replication, the two meiotic divisions, formation of the spore envelopes (comprising the plasma membrane and a specialized cell wall), and maturation of the spores (74, 81). At the onset of meiosis II, precursors of the spore envelopes, the forespore membranes (FSMs), are formed by the fusion of vesicles at the cytoplasmic surface of each spindle-pole body (SPB) and then extend to engulf the four nuclear lobes (the nuclear envelope does not break down during meiosis), thus capturing the haploid nuclei, along with associated cytoplasm and organelles, to form the nascent spores (55, 68, 81). How the FSMs recognize and interact with the nuclear envelope, extend in a properly oriented manner, and close to form uniformly sized spherical spores is not understood, and study of this model system should also help to elucidate the more general question of how membranes obtain their shapes in vivo.It has been shown that both the SPB and the vesicle trafficking system play important roles in the formation and development of the FSM and of its counterpart in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the prospore membrane (PSM). In S. pombe, the SPB changes its shape from a compact dot to a crescent at metaphase of meiosis II (26, 29), and its outer plaque acquires meiosis-specific components such as Spo2, Spo13, and Spo15 (30, 57, 68). This modified outer plaque is required for the initiation of FSM assembly. In S. cerevisiae, it is well established that various secretory (SEC) gene products are required for PSM formation (58, 59). Similarly, proteins presumably involved in the docking and/or fusion of post-Golgi vesicles and organelles in S. pombe, such as the syntaxin-1A Psy1, the SNAP-25 homologue Sec9, and the Rab7 GTPase homologue Ypt7, are also required for proper FSM extension (34, 53, 54). Consistent with this hypothesis, Psy1 disappears from the plasma membrane upon exit from meiosis I and reappears in the nascent FSM.Phosphoinositide-mediated membrane trafficking also contributes to the development of the FSM. Pik3/Vps34 is a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase whose product is phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate [PtdIns(3)P] (35, 72). S. pombe cells lacking this protein exhibit defects in various steps of FSM formation, such as aberrant starting positions for extension, disoriented extension and/or failure of closure, and the formation of spore-like bodies near, rather than surrounding, the nuclei, suggesting that Pik3 plays multiple roles during sporulation (61). The targets of PtdIns(3)P during sporulation appear to include two sorting nexins, Vps5 and Vps17, and the FYVE domain-containing protein Sst4/Vps27. vps5Δ and vps17Δ mutant cells share some of the phenotypes of pik3Δ cells (38). sst4Δ cells also share some of the phenotypes of pik3Δ cells but are distinct from vps5Δ and vps17Δ cells, consistent with the hypothesis that Pik3 has multiple roles during sporulation (62).Membrane trafficking processes alone do not seem sufficient to explain how the FSMs and PSMs extend around and engulf the nuclei, suggesting that some other mechanism(s) must regulate and orient FSM/PSM extension. The observation that the FSM is attached to the SPB until formation of the immature spore is complete (68) suggests that the SPB may regulate FSM extension. In addition, the leading edge of the S. cerevisiae PSM is coated with a complex of proteins (the LEPs) that appear to be involved in PSM extension (51, 59). S. pombe Meu14 also localizes to the leading edge of the FSM, and deletion of meu14 causes aberrant FSM formation in addition to a failure in SPB modification (60). However, it has remained unclear whether the SPB- and LEP-based mechanisms are sufficient to account for the formation of closed FSMs and PSMs of proper size and position (relative to the nuclear envelope), and evidence from S. cerevisiae has suggested that the septin proteins may also be involved.The septins are a conserved family of GTP-binding proteins that were first identified in S. cerevisiae by analysis of the cytokinesis-defective cdc3, cdc10, cdc11, and cdc12 mutants (41). Cdc3, Cdc10, Cdc11, and Cdc12 are related to each other in sequence and form an oligomeric complex that localizes to a ring in close apposition to the plasma membrane at the mother-bud neck in vegetative cells (12, 20, 25, 41, 47, 77). The septin ring appears to be filamentous in vivo (12), and indeed, the septins from both yeast (11, 20) and metazoans (31, 36, 69) can form filaments in vitro. The yeast septin ring appears to form a scaffold for the localization and organization of a wide variety of other proteins (8, 22), and it forms a diffusion barrier that constrains movement of membrane proteins through the neck region (7, 8, 73). In metazoan cells, the septins are involved in cytokinesis but are also implicated in a variety of other cellular processes, such as vesicular transport, organization of the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons, and oncogenesis (27, 70).In S. cerevisiae, a fifth septin (Shs1) is also expressed in vegetative cells, but the remaining two septin genes, SPR3 and SPR28, are expressed at detectable levels only during sporulation (15, 17). In addition, at least some of the vegetatively expressed septins are also present in sporulating cells (17, 48), and one of them (Cdc10) is expressed at much higher levels there than in vegetative cells (32). The septins present during sporulation are associated with the PSM (15, 17, 48, 51), and their normal organization there depends on the Gip1-Glc7 protein phosphatase complex (71). However, it has been difficult to gain insight into the precise roles of the septins during sporulation in S. cerevisiae (59), because some septins are essential for viability during vegetative growth, and the viable mutants have only mild phenotypes during sporulation (15, 17), possibly because of functional redundancy among the multiple septins.S. pombe seemed likely to provide a better opportunity for investigating the role of septins during spore formation. There are seven septin genes (spn1⁺ to spn7⁺) in this organism (23, 41, 63). Four of these genes (spn1⁺ to spn4⁺) are expressed in vegetative cells, and their products form a hetero-oligomeric complex that assembles during cytokinesis into a ring at the division site (2, 3, 10, 76, 79). The septin ring is important for proper targeting of endoglucanases to the division site (44), and septin mutants show a corresponding delay in cell separation (10, 41, 44, 76). However, even the spn1Δ spn2Δ spn3Δ spn4Δ quadruple mutant is viable and grows nearly as rapidly as the wild type (our unpublished results), a circumstance that greatly facilitates studies of the septins'' role during sporulation.spn5⁺, spn6⁺, and spn7⁺ are expressed at detectable levels only during sporulation (1, 45, 78; our unpublished results), and spn2⁺, like its orthologue CDC10 (see above), is strongly induced (45), but the roles of the S. pombe septins in sporulation have not previously been investigated. In this study, we show that the septins are important for the orientation of FSM extension, suggesting that the septins may have a more general role in dynamic membrane organization and shape determination.     

Distinct Molecular Pathways to X4 Tropism for a V3-Truncated Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Lead to Differential Coreceptor Interactions and Sensitivity to a CXCR4 Antagonist

During the course of infection, transmitted HIV-1 isolates that initially use CCR5 can acquire the ability to use CXCR4, which is associated with an accelerated progression to AIDS. Although this coreceptor switch is often associated with mutations in the stem of the viral envelope (Env) V3 loop, domains outside V3 can also play a role, and the underlying mechanisms and structural basis for how X4 tropism is acquired remain unknown. In this study we used a V3 truncated R5-tropic Env as a starting point to derive two X4-tropic Envs, termed ΔV3-X4A.c5 and ΔV3-X4B.c7, which took distinct molecular pathways for this change. The ΔV3-X4A.c5 Env clone acquired a 7-amino-acid insertion in V3 that included three positively charged residues, reestablishing an interaction with the CXCR4 extracellular loops (ECLs) and rendering it highly susceptible to the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100. In contrast, the ΔV3-X4B.c7 Env maintained the V3 truncation but acquired mutations outside V3 that were critical for X4 tropism. In contrast to ΔV3-X4A.c5, ΔV3-X4B.c7 showed increased dependence on the CXCR4 N terminus (NT) and was completely resistant to AMD3100. These results indicate that HIV-1 X4 coreceptor switching can involve (i) V3 loop mutations that establish interactions with the CXCR4 ECLs, and/or (ii) mutations outside V3 that enhance interactions with the CXCR4 NT. The cooperative contributions of CXCR4 NT and ECL interactions with gp120 in acquiring X4 tropism likely impart flexibility on pathways for viral evolution and suggest novel approaches to isolate these interactions for drug discovery.For human immunodeficiency virus type I (HIV-1) to enter a target cell, the gp120 subunit of the viral envelope glycoprotein (Env) must engage CD4 and a coreceptor on the cell surface. Although numerous coreceptors have been identified in vitro, the two most important coreceptors in vivo are the CCR5 (3, 11, 19, 22, 24) and CXCR4 (27) chemokine receptors. HIV-1 variants that can use only CCR5 (R5 viruses) are critical for HIV-1 transmission and predominate during the early stages of infection (86, 90). The importance of CCR5 for HIV-1 transmission is underscored by the fact that individuals bearing a homozygous 32-bp deletion in the CCR5 gene (ccr5-Δ32) are largely resistant to HIV-1 infection (15, 49, 84). Although R5 viruses typically persist into late disease stages, viruses that can use CXCR4, either alone (X4 viruses) or in addition to CCR5 (R5X4 viruses), emerge in approximately 50% of individuals infected with subtype B or D viruses (12, 39, 44). Although not required for disease progression, the appearance of X4 and/or R5X4 viruses is associated with a more rapid depletion of CD4⁺ cells in peripheral blood and faster progression to AIDS (12, 44, 77, 86). However, it remains unclear whether these viruses are a cause or a consequence of accelerated CD4⁺ T cell decline (57). The emergence of CXCR4-using viruses has also complicated the use of small-molecule CCR5 antagonists as anti-HIV-therapeutics as these compounds can select for the outgrowth of X4 or R5X4 escape variants (93).Following triggering by CD4, gp120 binds to a coreceptor via two principal interactions: (i) the bridging sheet, a four-stranded antiparallel beta sheet that connects the inner and outer domains of gp120, together with the base of the V3 loop, engages the coreceptor N terminus (NT); and (ii) more distal regions of V3 interact with the coreceptor extracellular loops (ECLs) (13, 14, 36-38, 43, 59, 60, 78, 79, 88). Although both the NT and ECL interactions are important for coreceptor binding and entry, their relative contributions vary among different HIV-1 strains (23). For example, V3 interactions with the ECLs, particularly ECL2, serve a dominant role in CXCR4 utilization (7, 21, 50, 63, 72), while R5 viruses exhibit a more variable use of CCR5 domains, with the NT interaction being particularly important (4, 6, 20, 67, 83). Although V3 is the primary determinant of coreceptor preference (34), it is unclear how specificity for CCR5 and/or CXCR4 is determined, and, in particular, it is unknown how X4 tropism is acquired. Several reports have shown that the emergence of X4 tropism correlates with the acquisition of positively charged residues in the V3 stem (17, 29, 87), particularly at positions 11, 24, and 25 (8, 17, 28, 29, 42, 75), raising the possibility that these mutations directly or indirectly mediate interactions with negatively charged residues in the CXCR4 ECLs. However, Env domains outside V3, including V1/V2 (9, 32, 45, 46, 61, 64, 65, 80, 95) and even gp41 (40), can also contribute to coreceptor switching, and it is unclear mechanistically or structurally how X4 tropism is determined.We previously derived a replication-competent variant of the R5X4 HIV-1 clone R3A that contained a markedly truncated V3 loop (47). This Env was generated by introducing a mutation termed ΔV3(9,9), which deleted the distal 15 amino acids of V3. The ΔV3(9,9) mutation selectively ablated X4 tropism but left R5 tropism intact, consistent with the view that an interaction between the distal half of V3 and the ECLs is critical for CXCR4 usage (7, 21, 43, 50, 59, 60, 63, 72). This V3-truncated virus provided a unique opportunity to address whether CXCR4 utilization could be regained on a background in which this critical V3-ECL interaction had been ablated and, if so, by what mechanism. Here, we characterize two novel X4 variants of R3A ΔV3(9,9) derived by adapting this virus to replicate in CXCR4⁺ CCR5⁻ SupT1 cells. We show that R3A ΔV3(9,9) could indeed reacquire X4 tropism but through two markedly different mechanisms. One X4 variant, designated ΔV3-X4A, acquired changes in the V3 remnant that reestablished an interaction with the CXCR4 ECLs; the other, ΔV3-X4B, acquired changes outside V3 that engendered interactions with the CXCR4 NT. These divergent evolutionary pathways led to profound differences in sensitivity to the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100, with ΔV3-X4A showing increased sensitivity relative to R3A and with ΔV3-X4B becoming completely resistant. These findings demonstrate the contributions that interactions with distinct coreceptor regions have in mediating tropism and drug sensitivity and illustrate how HIV''s remarkable evolutionary plasticity in adapting to selection pressures can be exploited to better understand its biological potential.     

The Amino Terminus of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Glycoprotein K (gK) Modulates gB-Mediated Virus-Induced Cell Fusion and Virion Egress

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1)-induced cell fusion is mediated by viral glycoproteins and other membrane proteins expressed on infected cell surfaces. Certain mutations in the carboxyl terminus of HSV-1 glycoprotein B (gB) and in the amino terminus of gK cause extensive virus-induced cell fusion. Although gB is known to be a fusogenic glycoprotein, the mechanism by which gK is involved in virus-induced cell fusion remains elusive. To delineate the amino-terminal domains of gK involved in virus-induced cell fusion, the recombinant viruses gKΔ31-47, gKΔ31-68, and gKΔ31-117, expressing gK carrying in-frame deletions spanning the amino terminus of gK immediately after the gK signal sequence (amino acids [aa] 1 to 30), were constructed. Mutant viruses gKΔ31-47 and gKΔ31-117 exhibited a gK-null (ΔgK) phenotype characterized by the formation of very small viral plaques and up to a 2-log reduction in the production of infectious virus in comparison to that for the parental HSV-1(F) wild-type virus. The gKΔ31-68 mutant virus formed substantially larger plaques and produced 1-log-higher titers than the gKΔ31-47 and gKΔ31-117 mutant virions at low multiplicities of infection. Deletion of 28 aa from the carboxyl terminus of gB (gBΔ28syn) caused extensive virus-induced cell fusion. However, the gBΔ28syn mutation was unable to cause virus-induced cell fusion in the presence of the gKΔ31-68 mutation. Transient expression of a peptide composed of the amino-terminal 82 aa of gK (gKa) produced a glycosylated peptide that was efficiently expressed on cell surfaces only after infection with the HSV-1(F), gKΔ31-68, ΔgK, or UL20-null virus. The gKa peptide complemented the gKΔ31-47 and gKΔ31-68 mutant viruses for infectious-virus production and for gKΔ31-68/gBΔ28syn-mediated cell fusion. These data show that the amino terminus of gK modulates gB-mediated virus-induced cell fusion and virion egress.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) specifies at least 11 virally encoded glycoproteins, as well as several nonglycosylated and lipid-anchored membrane-associated proteins, which serve important functions in virion infectivity and virus spread. Although cell-free enveloped virions can efficiently spread viral infection, virions can also spread by causing cell fusion of adjacent cellular membranes. Virus-induced cell fusion, which is caused by viral glycoproteins expressed on infected cell surfaces, enables transmission of virions from one cell to another, avoiding extracellular spaces and exposure of free virions to neutralizing antibodies (reviewed in reference 56). Most mutations that cause extensive virus-induced cell-to-cell fusion (syncytial or syn mutations) have been mapped to at least four regions of the viral genome: the UL20 gene (5, 42, 44); the UL24 gene (37, 58); the UL27 gene, encoding glycoprotein B (gB) (9, 51); and the UL53 gene, coding for gK (7, 15, 35, 53, 54, 57).Increasing evidence suggests that virus-induced cell fusion is mediated by the concerted action of glycoproteins gD, gB, and gH/gL. Recent studies have shown that gD interacts with both gB and gH/gL (1, 2). Binding of gD to its cognate receptors, including Nectin-1, HVEM, and others (12, 29, 48, 59, 60, 62, 63), is thought to trigger conformation changes in gH/gL and gB that cause fusion of the viral envelope with cellular membranes during virus entry and virus-induced cell fusion (32, 34). Transient coexpression of gB, gD, and gH/gL causes cell-to-cell fusion (49, 68). However, this phenomenon does not accurately model viral fusion, because other viral glycoproteins and membrane proteins known to be important for virus-induced cell fusion are not required (6, 14, 31). Specifically, gK and UL20 were shown to be absolutely required for virus-induced cell fusion (21, 46). Moreover, syncytial mutations within gK (7, 15, 35, 53, 54, 57) or UL20 (5, 42, 44) promote extensive virus-induced cell fusion, and viruses lacking gK enter more slowly than wild-type virus into susceptible cells (25). Furthermore, transient coexpression of gK carrying a syncytial mutation with gB, gD, and gH/gL did not enhance cell fusion, while coexpression of the wild-type gK with gB, gD, and gH/gL inhibited cell fusion (3).Glycoproteins gB and gH are highly conserved across all subfamilies of herpesviruses. gB forms a homotrimeric type I integral membrane protein, which is N glycosylated at multiple sites within the polypeptide. An unusual feature of gB is that syncytial mutations that enhance virus-induced cell fusion are located exclusively in the carboxyl terminus of gB, which is predicted to be located intracellularly (51). Single-amino-acid substitutions within two regions of the intracellular cytoplasmic domain of gB were shown to cause syncytium formation and were designated region I (amino acid [aa] positions 816 and 817) and region II (aa positions 853, 854, and 857) (9, 10, 28, 69). Furthermore, deletion of 28 aa from the carboxyl terminus of gB, disrupting the small predicted alpha-helical domain H17b, causes extensive virus-induced cell fusion as well as extensive glycoprotein-mediated cell fusion in the gB, gD, and gH/gL transient-coexpression system (22, 49, 68). The X-ray structure of the ectodomain of gB has been determined and is predicted to assume at least two major conformations, one of which may be necessary for the fusogenic properties of gB. Therefore, perturbation of the carboxyl terminus of gB may alter the conformation of the amino terminus of gB, thus favoring one of the two predicted conformational structures that causes membrane fusion (34).The UL53 (gK) and UL20 genes encode multipass transmembrane proteins of 338 and 222 aa, respectively, which are conserved in all alphaherpesviruses (15, 42, 55). Both proteins have multiple sites where posttranslational modification can occur; however, only gK is posttranslationally modified by N-linked carbohydrate addition (15, 35, 55). The specific membrane topologies of both gK and UL20 protein (UL20p) have been predicted and experimentally confirmed using epitope tags inserted within predicted intracellular and extracellular domains (18, 21, 44). Syncytial mutations in gK map predominantly within extracellular domains of gK and particularly within the amino-terminal portion of gK (domain I) (18), while syncytial mutations of UL20 are located within the amino terminus of UL20p, shown to be located intracellularly (44). A series of recent studies have shown that HSV-1 gK and UL20 functionally and physically interact and that these interactions are necessary for their coordinate intracellular transport and cell surface expression (16, 18, 21, 26, 45). Specifically, direct protein-protein interactions between the amino terminus of HSV-1 UL20 and gK domain III, both of which are localized intracellularly, were recently demonstrated by two-way coimmunoprecipitation experiments (19).According to the most prevalent model for herpesvirus intracellular morphogenesis, capsids initially assemble within the nuclei and acquire a primary envelope by budding into the perinuclear spaces. Subsequently, these virions lose their envelope through fusion with the outer nuclear lamellae. Within the cytoplasm, tegument proteins associate with the viral nucleocapsid and final envelopment occurs by budding of cytoplasmic capsids into specific trans-Golgi network (TGN)-associated membranes (8, 30, 47, 70). Mature virions traffic to cell surfaces, presumably following the cellular secretory pathway (33, 47, 61). In addition to their significant roles in virus-induced cell fusion, gK and UL20 are required for cytoplasmic virion envelopment. Viruses with deletions in either the gK or the UL20 gene are unable to translocate from the cytoplasm to extracellular spaces and accumulated as unenveloped virions in the cytoplasm (5, 15, 20, 21, 26, 35, 36, 38, 44, 55). Current evidence suggests that the functions of gK and UL20 in cytoplasmic virion envelopment and virus-induced cell fusion are carried out by different, genetically separable domains of UL20p. Specifically, UL20 mutations within the amino and carboxyl termini of UL20p allowed cotransport of gK and UL20p to cell surfaces, virus-induced cell fusion, and TGN localization, while effectively inhibiting cytoplasmic virion envelopment (44, 45).In this paper, we demonstrate that the amino terminus of gK expressed as a free peptide of 82 aa (gKa) is transported to infected cell surfaces by viral proteins other than gK or UL20p and facilitates virus-induced cell fusion caused by syncytial mutations in the carboxyl terminus of gB. Thus, functional domains of gK can be genetically separated, as we have shown previously (44, 45), as well as physically separated into different peptide portions that retain functional activities of gK. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the amino terminus of gK directly or indirectly interacts with and modulates the fusogenic properties of gB.     

Adeno-Associated Virus Replication Induces a DNA Damage Response Coordinated by DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase

The parvovirus adeno-associated virus (AAV) contains a small single-stranded DNA genome with inverted terminal repeats that form hairpin structures. In order to propagate, AAV relies on the cellular replication machinery together with functions supplied by coinfecting helper viruses such as adenovirus (Ad). Here, we examined the host cell response to AAV replication in the context of Ad or Ad helper proteins. We show that AAV and Ad coinfection activates a DNA damage response (DDR) that is distinct from that seen during Ad or AAV infection alone. The DDR was also triggered when AAV replicated in the presence of minimal Ad helper proteins. We detected autophosphorylation of the kinases ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) and signaling to downstream targets SMC1, Chk1, Chk2, H2AX, and XRCC4 and multiple sites on RPA32. The Mre11 complex was not required for activation of the DDR to AAV infection. Additionally, we found that DNA-PKcs was the primary mediator of damage signaling in response to AAV replication. Immunofluorescence revealed that some activated damage proteins were found in a pan-nuclear pattern (phosphorylated ATM, SMC1, and H2AX), while others such as DNA-PK components (DNA-PKcs, Ku70, and Ku86) and RPA32 accumulated at AAV replication centers. Although expression of the large viral Rep proteins contributed to some damage signaling, we observed that the full response required replication of the AAV genome. Our results demonstrate that AAV replication in the presence of Ad helper functions elicits a unique damage response controlled by DNA-PK.Replication of viral genomes produces a large amount of extrachromosomal DNA that may be recognized by the cellular DNA damage machinery. This is often accompanied by activation of DNA damage response (DDR) signaling pathways and recruitment of cellular repair proteins to sites of viral replication. Viruses therefore provide good model systems to study the recognition and response to DNA damage (reviewed in reference 48). The Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (MRN) complex functions as a sensor of chromosomal DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and is involved in activation of damage signaling (reviewed in reference 41). The MRN complex also localizes to DNA DSBs and is found at viral replication compartments during infection with a number of DNA viruses (6, 40, 47, 70, 75, 77, 87, 93). The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-like kinases (PIKKs) ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), ATM and Rad3-related kinase (ATR), and the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs) are involved in the signal transduction cascades activated by DNA damage (reviewed in references 43, 51, and 71). These kinases respond to distinct types of damage and regulate DSB repair during different phases of the cell cycle (5), either through nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination pathways (reviewed in references 63, 81, and 86). The DNA-PK holoenzyme is composed of DNA-PKcs and two regulatory subunits, the Ku70 and Ku86 heterodimer. DNA-PK functions with XRCC4/DNA ligase IV to repair breaks during NHEJ, and works with Artemis to process DNA hairpin structures during VDJ recombination and during a subset of DNA DSB events (46, 50, 86). While the kinase activity of DNA-PKcs leads to phosphorylation of a large number of substrates in vitro as well as autophosphorylation of specific residues (reviewed in references 16 and 85), it is currently unclear how DNA-PKcs contributes to signaling in cells upon different types of damage.The adeno-associated virus (AAV) genome consists of a molecule of single-stranded DNA with inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) at both ends that form double-hairpin structures due to their palindromic sequences (reviewed in reference 52). The ITRs are important for replication and packaging of the viral genome and for integration into the host genome. Four viral Rep proteins (Rep78, Rep68, Rep52, and Rep40) are also required for replication and packaging of the AAV genome into virions assembled from the Cap proteins. Although the Rep and Cap genes are replaced in recombinant AAV vectors (rAAV) that retain only the ITRs flanking the gene of interest, these vectors can be replicated by providing Rep in trans (reviewed in reference 7). Productive AAV infection requires helper functions supplied by adenovirus (Ad) or other viruses such as herpes simplex virus (HSV) (reviewed in reference 27), together with components of the host cell DNA replication machinery (54, 55, 58). In the presence of helper viruses or minimal helper proteins from Ad or HSV, AAV replicates in the nucleus at centers where the viral DNA and Rep proteins accumulate (35, 76, 84, 89). Cellular and viral proteins involved in AAV replication, including replication protein A (RPA), Ad DNA-binding protein (DBP), and HSV ICP8, localize with Rep proteins at these viral centers (29, 33, 76).A number of published reports suggest associations between AAV and the cellular DNA damage machinery. For example, transduction by rAAV vectors is increased by genotoxic agents and DNA damaging treatments (1, 62, 91) although the mechanisms involved remain unclear. Additionally, the ATM kinase negatively regulates rAAV transduction (64, 92), and we have shown that the MRN complex poses a barrier to both rAAV transduction and wild-type AAV replication (11, 67). UV-inactivated AAV particles also appear to activate a DDR involving ATM and ATR kinases that perturbs cell cycle progression (39, 60, 88). It has been suggested that this response is provoked by the AAV ITRs (60) and that UV-treated particles mimic stalled replication forks in infected cells (39). In addition to AAV genome components, the viral Rep proteins have been observed to exhibit cytotoxicity and induce S-phase arrest (3, 65).The role of cellular repair proteins in AAV genome processing has also been explored by examining the molecular fate of rAAV vectors, which are converted into circular and concatemeric forms that persist episomally (18, 19, 66). Proteins shown to regulate circularization in cell culture include ATM and the MRN complex (14, 64), while in vivo experiments using mouse models have implicated ATM and DNA-PK in this process (14, 20, 72). Additionally, DNA-PKcs and Artemis have recently been shown to cleave the ITR hairpins of rAAV vectors in vivo in a tissue-dependent manner (36). Despite these studies, it is not clear how damage response factors function together and how they impact AAV transduction and replication in human cells.In this study we examined the cellular response to AAV replication in the context of Ad infection or helper proteins. We show that coinfection with AAV and Ad activates a DDR that is distinct from that seen during infection with Ad alone. The ATM and DNA-PKcs damage kinases are activated and signal to downstream substrates, but the response does not require the MRN complex and is primarily mediated by DNA-PKcs. Although expression of the large Rep proteins induced some DDR events, full signaling appeared to require AAV replication and was accompanied by accumulation of DNA-PK at viral replication compartments. Our results demonstrate that AAV replication induces a unique DNA damage signal transduction response and provides a model system for studying DNA-PK.     

BRCT Domain Interactions with Phospho-Histone H2A Target Crb2 to Chromatin at Double-Strand Breaks and Maintain the DNA Damage Checkpoint

Relocalization of checkpoint proteins to chromatin flanking DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is critical for cellular responses to DNA damage. Schizosaccharomyces pombe Crb2, which mediates Chk1 activation by Rad3^ATR, forms ionizing radiation-induced nuclear foci (IRIF). Crb2 C-terminal BRCT domains (BRCT₂) bind histone H2A phosphorylated at a C-terminal SQ motif by Tel1^ATM and Rad3^ATR, although the functional significance of this interaction is controversial. Here, we show that polar interactions of Crb2 serine-548 and lysine-619 with the phosphate group of phospho-H2A (γ-H2A) are critical for Crb2 IRIF formation and checkpoint function. Mutations of these BRCT₂ domain residues have additive effects when combined in a single allele. Combining either mutation with an allele that eliminates the threonine-215 cyclin-dependent kinase phosphorylation site completely abrogates Crb2 IRIF and function. We propose that cooperative phosphate interactions in the BRCT₂ γ-H2A-binding pocket of Crb2, coupled with tudor domain interactions with lysine-20 dimethylation of histone H4, facilitate stable recruitment of Crb2 to chromatin surrounding DSBs, which in turn mediates efficient phosphorylation of Chk1 that is required for a sustained checkpoint response. This mechanism of cooperative interactions with the γ-H2A/X phosphate is likely conserved in S. pombe Brc1 and human Mdc1 genome maintenance proteins.Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most dangerous forms of DNA damage (26, 30). Human cells experience DSBs several times a day, either during normal metabolism or as a consequence of exposure to DNA-damaging agents, such as ionizing radiation (IR) (18). Importantly, the unfaithful repair of such breaks can result in genome instability and cancer. The response to DSBs is coordinated by a conserved signal transduction cascade, which leads to cell cycle arrest and activation of DNA repair and constitutes the checkpoint response (9, 14, 20). The essential players in this process fall into four groups: sensors, mediators, transducers, and effectors (20). Sensors are the first to recognize and bind to DNA breaks and include the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex in humans and Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae). The PIKKs (phosphoinositide 3-kinase-like kinases) ATR-ATRIP (ScMec1-ScDdc2/SpRad3-SpRad26) and ATM (ScTel1/SpTel1) act as transducers that transmit the signal to the effector kinases Chk1 (ScChk1/SpChk1) and Chk2 (ScRad53/SpCds1), whose role is to target downstream targets, such as p53 in mammals, and to amplify the signal (9, 14, 20).Signaling between transducers and effectors is facilitated and enhanced by mediator proteins (19, 20). In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Crb2/Rhp9 is a critical mediator of the DNA damage checkpoint (31, 42) and is related to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 and mammalian 53BP1 (p53 binding protein 1). Rad3^ATR-Rad26^ATRIP phosphorylates Crb2 in response to damage, and Crb2 is required for phosphorylation of Chk1 by Rad3^ATR-Rad26^ATRIP (31). Chk1, in turn, restrains entry into mitosis by phosphorylating and thus inactivating the phosphatase Cdc25 that is a mitotic inducer (10, 11, 28). Crb2-null cells are sensitive to a range of genotoxins and are unable to delay division in response to DNA damage (31, 42).Crb2 is a nuclear protein that rapidly relocalizes to DSBs. This occurs on such a large scale that IR-induced nuclear foci (IRIF) of yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)-tagged Crb2 expressed from the endogenous promoter are readily detected by live cell microscopy (5). These foci colocalize with homologous recombination (HR) repair factors such as Rad22^Rad52. Two types of histone modifications regulate Crb2 localization at DSBs: C-terminal phosphorylation of histone H2A, denoted as γ-H2A (23), and lysine-20 dimethylation of histone H4, denoted as H4-K20me2 (32). Phosphorylation of an SQ motif within the C-terminal tail of histone H2A of budding yeast or fission yeast, or the H2AX variant in mammals, is one of the earliest cellular responses triggered by DNA damage (3, 23, 29). The γ-H2A/X modification, which is catalyzed by the checkpoint kinases ATR^Rad3 and ATM^Tel1, spans large distances on both sides of a DSB, and it plays a critical role in recruiting DNA damage response proteins, chromatin remodeling complexes, and cohesin (2, 21, 23, 34, 35, 37, 38, 40). Protein crystallography and biochemical studies established that mammalian Mdc1, S. pombe Crb2, and Brc1 DNA damage response proteins directly bind the phosphorylated tail of histone H2A/X through tandem C-terminal BRCT domains (16, 35, 40). In contrast to γ-H2A, H4-K20 methylation catalyzed by Set9/Kmt5 histone methyltransferase appears to be constitutive and not regulated by DNA damage (32). H4-K20me2 directly binds tandem tudor domains (Tudor₂) located to the N-terminal side of the BRCT domains in Crb2 (1).YFP-Crb2 does not form IRIF in hta1-S129A hta2-S128A (htaAQ) or rad3Δ tel1Δ cells, in which γ-H2A phosphorylation is abolished (23), or in set9Δ cells or tudor domain mutants of Crb2 that ablate binding to H4-K20me2 (6, 32). However, Crb2 checkpoint functions are only partially impaired in an htaAQ set9Δ strain, implying that physiologically significant recruitment of Crb2 to DSBs also occurs by a histone modification-independent pathway. Indeed, we found that YFP-Crb2 forms microscopically visible foci in htaAQ set9Δ cells when DSBs are created by HO endonuclease or by treating cells in G₁ phase with IR (6). Unlike IR-induced DSBs formed during G₂ phase, these types of DSBs lack an intact sister chromatid that can be used for HR repair and therefore they are highly persistent. Further analysis revealed that the histone modification-independent pathway of recruiting Crb2 to DSBs requires threonine-215 (Thr215) phosphorylation catalyzed by the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) Cdc2, which facilitates an interaction with Cut5 (ScDpb11; mammalian TopBP1) (6, 8, 31). The crb2-T215A mutation does not ablate YFP-Crb2 IRIF formation; however, Crb2 Thr215 phosphorylation is required for formation of YFP-Crb2 foci at persistent DSBs in htaAQ or set9Δ cells, and combining crb2-T215A with htaAQ or set9Δ abolishes Crb2 function (6).The tandem C-terminal BRCT domains (BRCT₂) of Crb2 not only mediate interactions with γ-H2A but also coordinate Crb2 homodimerization (4). In fact, replacing BRCT₂ with a leucine zipper (LZ) dimerization motif restores substantial function to Crb2 without restoring its ability to form IRIF. Thus, the most crucial task of the Crb2 BRCT domains is to provide a homodimerization platform, while binding to γ-H2A provides an additional function that is necessary for full resistance to DNA damage (4).In a recent study, Kilkenny et al. (16) solved the crystal structures of Crb2-BRCT₂ alone and in complex with a γ-H2A-derived phosphopeptide containing the common C-terminal residues of H2A.1 and H2A.2 (the two H2A paralogues in S. pombe). These analyses revealed the structural determinants of BRCT₂ binding to γ-H2A and BRCT₂-mediated homodimerization of Crb2. Ser666 was found to be critical for homodimerization in vitro, and mutation of this residue severely impaired Crb2 function in vivo. Residues Ser548 and Lys619 were identified as important for the interaction with the phosphate group on γ-H2A.1 pSer129. However, a charge reversal mutation of Lys619 did not abrogate Crb2 IRIF formation measured using methanol-fixed cells, although it did disrupt binding to a γ-H2A peptide in vitro (16). These unexpected findings indicated that γ-H2A likely has an indirect role in regulating Crb2 localization at DSBs. Here, we investigate Crb2 localization in live cells and find that while mutations of Ser548 or Lys619 partially impair Crb2 IRIF, the corresponding double mutant is severely deficient in Crb2 IRIF formation. Our findings and an independent study by Sanders et al. (33) show that γ-H2A binding to BRCT₂ is critical for Crb2 focus formation at IR-induced DSBs and for maintaining a DNA damage checkpoint response.     

Vaccine protection by live, attenuated simian immunodeficiency virus in the absence of high-titer antibody responses and high-frequency cellular immune responses measurable in the periphery

An attenuated derivative of simian immunodeficiency virus strain 239 deleted of V1-V2 sequences in the envelope gene (SIV239ΔV1-V2) was used for vaccine/challenge experiments in rhesus monkeys. Peak levels of viral RNA in plasma of 10⁴ to 10^6.5 copies/ml in the weeks immediately following inoculation of SIV239ΔV1-V2 were 10- to 1,000-fold lower than those observed with parental SIV239 (∼10^7.3 copies/ml). Viral loads consistently remained below 200 copies/ml after 8 weeks of infection by the attenuated SIV239ΔV1-V2 strain. Viral localization experiments revealed large numbers of infected cells within organized lymphoid nodules of the colonic gut-associated lymphoid tissue at 14 days; double-labeling experiments indicated that 93.5% of the virally infected cells at this site were positive for the macrophage marker CD68. Cellular and humoral immune responses measured principally by gamma interferon enzyme-linked immunospot and neutralization assays were variable in the five vaccinated monkeys. One monkey had responses in these assays comparable to or only slightly less than those observed in monkeys infected with parental, wild-type SIV239. Four of the vaccinated monkeys, however, had low, marginal, or undetectable responses in these same assays. These five vaccinated monkeys and three naïve control monkeys were subsequently challenged intravenously with wild-type SIV239. Three of the five vaccinated monkeys, including the one with strong anti-SIV immune responses, were strongly protected against the challenge on the basis of viral load measurements. Surprisingly, two of the vaccinated monkeys were strongly protected against SIV239 challenge despite the presence of cellular anti-SIV responses of low-frequency and low-titer anti-SIV antibody responses. These results indicate that high-titer anti-SIV antibody responses and high-frequency anti-SIV cellular immune responses measurable by standard assays from the peripheral blood are not needed to achieve strong vaccine protection, even against a difficult, neutralization-resistant strain such as SIV239.The characteristics of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection suggest major difficulty for the development of a preventive vaccine (19, 23). Pessimism regarding the prospects for a vaccine is derived at least in part from the ability of HIV-1 to continually replicate in the face of apparently strong host immune responses, resistance to antibody-mediated neutralization, and the extensive sequence diversity in field strains of the virus. Lack of knowledge regarding the key components of a protective immune response also remains a major scientific obstacle. Vaccine/challenge experiments with macaque monkeys have been used to evaluate the properties and relative effectiveness of different vaccine approaches and to gauge the formidable nature of these difficulties.One lesson that has been learned from vaccine/challenge experiments with macaque monkeys is the importance of challenge strain on outcome. Vaccinated monkeys that have been challenged with strains of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) with an HIV-1 envelope (SHIV) have almost invariably exhibited strong, long-term protection against disease, irrespective of the nature of the vaccine. Even peptide immunogens have protected against SHIV-induced disease (6, 12, 38). Vaccine approaches that have protected against SHIV challenge include DNA (5, 13), recombinant poxvirus (4), recombinant adenovirus (57), other viral recombinants (18, 55), prime and boost protocols (3, 53, 65), and purified protein (10, 64). Vaccine protection against pathogenic SIV strains such as SIV239, SIV251, and SIV-E660 has been much more difficult to achieve (2, 11, 27, 63). The identical replication-defective gag-recombinant adenovirus that provided strong protection against SHIV challenge (57) provided little or no protection against SIV239 challenge (11). Disappointing levels of protection against SIV have often been observed in the face of apparently robust vaccine-induced immune responses (see, for example, Vogel et al. [63] and Casimiro et al. [11]). Some partial vaccine protections against these SIV strains have been achieved by recombinant poxvirus (7, 50), replication-competent recombinant adenovirus (51), replication-defective adenovirus (66), recombinant poliovirus (15), recombinant Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (18), and recombinant Sendai virus (44).Differences between the biological properties of the SIV strains and those of the SHIV strains used for the above-mentioned studies provide clues as to what may be responsible for the differences in outcome. These SIV strains are difficult to neutralize (26, 34), use CCR5 as a coreceptor for entry into cells (21, 52), and induce a chronic, progressive disease course (17), and this course is independent of the infectious dose (17). The SHIV strains used for the above-mentioned studies are easier to neutralize, use CXCR4 for entry, and induce an acute decline in CD4 counts, and the disease course is dose dependent (29, 30, 48, 54). These SIV strains, like HIV-1 in humans, exhibit a marked preference for CD4⁺ CCR5⁺ memory cells, in contrast to the acutely pathogenic SHIV strains which principally target naïve cells (48).Live, attenuated strains of SIV have provided the strongest vaccine protection by far against SIV challenge. Although clinical use of a live, attenuated HIV vaccine is not being considered, understanding the basis of the strong protection afforded by live, attenuated SIV strains remains an important research objective for the insights that can be provided. Most of the attenuated SIV strains that have been used lack a functional nef gene (16, 31, 58, 67). Shacklett et al. (56) used an attenuated SIV strain with modifications in the gp41 transmembrane protein for protection. Here, we describe strong vaccine protection by a replication-competent SIV strain lacking 100 amino acids from the essential gp120 envelope protein in the absence of overtly robust immune responses.