An Inhibitory Antibody Blocks the First Step in the Dithiol/Disulfide Relay Mechanism of the Enzyme QSOX1

Quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase 1 (QSOX1) is a catalyst of disulfide bond formation that undergoes regulated secretion from fibroblasts and is over-produced in adenocarcinomas and other cancers. We have recently shown that QSOX1 is required for incorporation of particular laminin isoforms into the extracellular matrix (ECM) of cultured fibroblasts and, as a consequence, for tumor cell adhesion to and penetration of the ECM. The known role of laminins in integrin-mediated cell survival and motility suggests that controlling QSOX1 activity may provide a novel means of combating metastatic disease. With this motivation, we developed a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the activity of human QSOX1. Here, we present the biochemical and structural characterization of this antibody and demonstrate that it is a tight-binding inhibitor that blocks one of the redox-active sites in the enzyme, but not the site at which de novo disulfides are generated catalytically. Sulfhydryl oxidase activity is thus prevented without direct binding of the sulfhydryl oxidase domain, confirming the model for the interdomain QSOX1 electron transfer mechanism originally surmised based on mutagenesis and protein dissection. In addition, we developed a single-chain variant of the antibody and show that it is a potent QSOX1 inhibitor. The QSOX1 inhibitory antibody will be a valuable tool in studying the role of ECM composition and architecture in cell migration, and the recombinant version may be further developed for potential therapeutic applications based on manipulation of the tumor microenvironment.     

Interactions between the Translation Machinery and Microtubules

Microtubules are components of eukaryotic cytoskeleton that are involved in the transport of various components from the nucleus to the cell periphery and back. They also act as a platform for assembly of complex molecular ensembles. Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes, such as ribosomes and mRNPs, are transported over significant distances (e.g. to neuronal processes) along microtubules. The association of RNPs with microtubules and their transport along these structures are essential for compartmentalization of protein biosynthesis in cells. Microtubules greatly facilitate assembly of stress RNP granules formed by accumulation of translation machinery components during cell stress response. Microtubules are necessary for the cytoplasm-to-nucleus transport of proteins, including ribosomal proteins. At the same time, ribosomal proteins and RNA-binding proteins can influence cell mobility and cytoplasm organization by regulating microtubule dynamics. The molecular mechanisms underlying the association between the translation machinery components and microtubules have not been studied systematically; the results of such studies are mostly fragmentary. In this review, we attempt to fill this gap by summarizing and discussing the data on protein and RNA components of the translation machinery that directly interact with microtubules or microtubule motor proteins.     

Role of Tyrosine Residues in Interactions between Casein Components

It was indicated from ultraviolet difference spectra and ultracentrifugal experiments that associations occurred between two casein components (α_s- and κ-caseins, β- and κ-caseins and α_s- and β-caseins) at lower CaCl₂ concentrations (2~3 mm) and that aromatic amino acid residues participated in the associations. Chemical modification studies with 2-hydroxy-5-nitrobenzylbromide indicated that tryptophane residues of each casein component were not essential for these associations. It was also demonstrated by nitration of tyrosine residues with tetranitromethane that tyrosine residues of κ-casein were essential for α_s·κ-association and for β·κ-association and that tyrosine residues of α_s-casein were important to α_s·β-association.

Interactions between casein components were also studied at higher CaCl₂ concentration (10 mm) which is enough for micelle formation. It was found that tyrosine residues of κ- casein played an important role for the stabilization of α_s- and β-caseins. Properties of the nitrated-β-casein were almost the same as that of the native β-casein except the absorption spectrum. α_s·β-Interaction in the presence of 10 mm CaCl₂ was investigated by use of the nitrated-β-casein instead of the native β-casein. It was proved that α_s-casein was stabilized by the nitrated-β-casein and that precipitation of the nitrated-β-casein increased in the presence of α_s-casein.

The mechanism of interactions between casein components at higher CaCl₂ concentration (10 mm) are discussed in connection with the associations at lower CaCl₂ concentrations (2~3 mm).     

Genetic Interactions between PEROXIN12 and Other Peroxisome-Associated Ubiquitination Components

Most eukaryotic cells require peroxisomes, organelles housing fatty acid β-oxidation and other critical metabolic reactions. Peroxisomal matrix proteins carry peroxisome-targeting signals that are recognized by one of two receptors, PEX5 or PEX7, in the cytosol. After delivering the matrix proteins to the organelle, these receptors are removed from the peroxisomal membrane or matrix. Receptor retrotranslocation not only facilitates further rounds of matrix protein import but also prevents deleterious PEX5 retention in the membrane. Three peroxisome-associated ubiquitin-protein ligases in the Really Interesting New Gene (RING) family, PEX2, PEX10, and PEX12, facilitate PEX5 retrotranslocation. However, the detailed mechanism of receptor retrotranslocation remains unclear in plants. We identified an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) pex12 Glu-to-Lys missense allele that conferred severe peroxisomal defects, including impaired β-oxidation, inefficient matrix protein import, and decreased growth. We compared this pex12-1 mutant to other peroxisome-associated ubiquitination-related mutants and found that RING peroxin mutants displayed elevated PEX5 and PEX7 levels, supporting the involvement of RING peroxins in receptor ubiquitination in Arabidopsis. Also, we observed that disruption of any Arabidopsis RING peroxin led to decreased PEX10 levels, as seen in yeast and mammals. Peroxisomal defects were exacerbated in RING peroxin double mutants, suggesting distinct roles of individual RING peroxins. Finally, reducing function of the peroxisome-associated ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme PEX4 restored PEX10 levels and partially ameliorated the other molecular and physiological defects of the pex12-1 mutant. Future biochemical analyses will be needed to determine whether destabilization of the RING peroxin complex observed in pex12-1 stems from PEX4-dependent ubiquitination on the pex12-1 ectopic Lys residue.Oilseed plants obtain energy for germination and early development by utilizing stored fatty acids (Graham, 2008). This β-oxidation of fatty acids to acetyl-CoA occurs in peroxisomes, organelles that also house other important metabolic reactions, including the glyoxylate cycle, several steps in photorespiration, and phytohormone production (Hu et al., 2012). For example, indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) is β-oxidized into the active auxin indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) in peroxisomes (Zolman et al., 2000, 2007, 2008; Strader et al., 2010; Strader and Bartel, 2011). Many peroxisomal metabolic pathways generate reactive oxygen species (Inestrosa et al., 1979; Hu et al., 2012), and peroxisomes also house antioxidative enzymes, like catalase and ascorbate peroxidase, to detoxify hydrogen peroxide (Wang et al., 1999; Mhamdi et al., 2012).Peroxisomes can divide by fission or be synthesized de novo from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Preperoxisomes with peroxisomal membrane proteins bud from the ER and fuse, allowing matrix proteins to be imported to form mature peroxisomes (van der Zand et al., 2012; Mayerhofer, 2016). Peroxin (PEX) proteins facilitate peroxisome biogenesis and matrix protein import. Most peroxins are involved in importing proteins destined for the peroxisome matrix, which are imported after recognition of a type 1 or type 2 peroxisome-targeting signal (PTS). The PTS1 is a tripeptide located at the C terminus of most peroxisome-bound proteins (Gould et al., 1989; Chowdhary et al., 2012). The less common PTS2 is a nonapeptide usually located near the N terminus (Swinkels et al., 1991; Reumann, 2004). PTS1 proteins are recognized by PEX5 (van der Leij et al., 1993; Zolman et al., 2000), PTS2 proteins are recognized by PEX7 (Marzioch et al., 1994; Braverman et al., 1997; Woodward and Bartel, 2005), and PEX7 binds to PEX5 to allow matrix protein delivery in plants and mammals (Otera et al., 1998; Hayashi et al., 2005; Woodward and Bartel, 2005). The cargo-receptor complex docks with the membrane peroxins PEX13 and PEX14 (Urquhart et al., 2000; Otera et al., 2002; Woodward et al., 2014), and PEX5 assists cargo translocation into the peroxisomal matrix (Meinecke et al., 2010) before dissociating from its cargo (Freitas et al., 2011).After cargo delivery, PEX5 is recycled to enable further rounds of cargo recruitment (Thoms and Erdmann, 2006). This process requires a set of peroxins that is implicated in ubiquitinating PEX5 so that it can be retrotranslocated back to the cytosol. PEX5 ubiquitination is best understood in yeast. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pex5 is monoubiquitinated through the action of the peroxisome-tethered ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Pex4 and the peroxisomal ubiquitin-protein ligase Pex12 (Platta et al., 2009) and returned to the cytosol with the assistance of a peroxisome-tethered ATPase complex containing Pex1 and Pex6 (Grimm et al., 2012). S. cerevisiae Pex5 also can be polyubiquitinated and targeted for proteasomal degradation (Kiel et al., 2005). The cytosolic ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc4 cooperates with the peroxisomal ubiquitin-protein ligase Pex2 to polyubiquitinate Pex5 (Platta et al., 2009). Pex10 has ubiquitin-protein ligase activity (Williams et al., 2008; Platta et al., 2009; El Magraoui et al., 2012), but whether Pex10 directly ubiquitinates Pex5 is controversial. Pex10 promotes Ubc4-dependent Pex5 polyubiquitination when Pex4 is absent (Williams et al., 2008); however, Pex10 is not essential for Pex5 mono- or polyubiquitination (Platta et al., 2009), but rather enhances both Pex4/Pex12- and Ubc4/Pex2-mediated ubiquitination (El Magraoui et al., 2012). Recycling of the PTS2 receptor PEX7 is less understood, although the Pex5 recycling pathways are implicated in shuttling and degrading Pex7 in Pichia pastoris (Hagstrom et al., 2014).Although PEX5 ubiquitination has not been directly demonstrated in plants, the implicated peroxins are conserved in Arabidopsis, and several have been connected to PEX5 retrotranslocation. The PEX4 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme binds to PEX22, which is predicted to be a peroxisomal membrane protein based on ability to restore peroxisome function to yeast mutants (Zolman et al., 2005). The pex4-1 mutant displays increased membrane-associated PEX5 (Ratzel et al., 2011; Kao and Bartel, 2015), suggesting that ubiquitin supplied by PEX4 promotes PEX5 retrotranslocation. PEX1 and PEX6 are members of the ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities (AAA) family and are tethered to peroxisomes by the peroxisomal membrane protein PEX26 (Goto et al., 2011; Li et al., 2014). The pex6-1 mutant displays PTS1 import defects and decreased PEX5 levels (Zolman and Bartel, 2004), suggesting that impaired PEX5 recycling can lead to increased PEX5 degradation. Indeed, pex4-1 restores PEX5 levels in the pex6-1 mutant (Ratzel et al., 2011), suggesting that Arabidopsis PEX4 also is involved in PEX5 ubiquitination and degradation when retrotranslocation is impeded.In addition to allowing for further rounds of PTS1 cargo import, several lines of evidence suggest that in the absence of efficient retrotranslocation, PEX5 retention in the peroxisomal membrane impairs peroxisome function. Slightly reducing levels of the PEX13 docking peroxin ameliorates the physiological defects of pex4-1 without restoring matrix protein import (Ratzel et al., 2011), presumably because decreasing PEX5 docking reduces its accumulation in the peroxisomal membrane. In addition, overexpressing PEX5 exacerbates rather than ameliorates the peroxisomal defects of pex4-1 (Kao and Bartel, 2015), suggesting that pex4-1 defects are linked to excessive PEX5 lingering in the peroxisome membrane rather than a lack of PEX5 available for import.The three Really Interesting New Gene (RING) peroxins (PEX2, PEX10, and PEX12) from Arabidopsis each possesses in vitro ubiquitin-protein ligase activity (Kaur et al., 2013). Null mutations in the RING peroxin genes confer embryo lethality in Arabidopsis (Hu et al., 2002; Schumann et al., 2003; Sparkes et al., 2003; Fan et al., 2005; Prestele et al., 2010), necessitating other approaches to study the in vivo functions of these peroxins. Expressing RING peroxins with mutations in the C-terminal zinc-binding RING domains (ΔZn) confers matrix protein import defects for PEX2-ΔZn and photorespiration defects for PEX10-ΔZn but no apparent defects for PEX12-ΔZn (Prestele et al., 2010). Targeting individual RING peroxins using RNAi confers β-oxidation deficiencies and impairs PTS1 cargo import (Fan et al., 2005; Nito et al., 2007). A screen for delayed matrix protein degradation (Burkhart et al., 2013) uncovered a missense pex2-1 mutant and a splicing pex10-2 mutant that both display PTS1 import defects (Burkhart et al., 2014), suggesting roles in regulating the PTS1 receptor, PEX5. A missense pex12 mutant (aberrant peroxisome morphology 4, apm4) has defects in β-oxidation and PTS1 import and increased membrane-associated PEX5 (Mano et al., 2006). These findings highlight the essential roles of the RING peroxins in Arabidopsis development and peroxisomal functions, but the RING peroxin interactions and the individual roles of the RING peroxins in PEX5 retrotranslocation remain incompletely understood.In this study, we describe a missense pex12-1 mutant recovered from a forward genetic screen for β-oxidation deficient mutants. The pex12-1 mutant displayed severe peroxisomal defects, including reduced growth, β-oxidation deficiencies, matrix protein import defects, and inefficient processing of PTS2 proteins. Comparing single and double mutants with impaired RING peroxins revealed that each RING peroxin contributes to complex stability and influences PEX5 accumulation. Furthermore, decreasing PEX4 function ameliorated pex12-1 defects, suggesting that the Glu-to-Lys substitution in pex12-1 lures ubiquitination, perhaps by pex12-1 itself, leading to PEX4-dependent degradation of the mutant protein.     

Covalent Label Transfer between Peroxisomal Importomer Components Reveals Export-driven Import Interactions

Peroxisomes are vital metabolic organelles found in almost all eukaryotic organisms, and they rely exclusively on import of their matrix protein content from the cytosol. In vitro import of proteins into isolated peroxisomal fractions has provided a wealth of knowledge on the import process. However, the common method of protease protection garnered no information on the import of an N-terminally truncated PEX5 (PEX5C) receptor construct or peroxisomal malate dehydrogenase 1 (pMDH1) cargo protein into sunflower peroxisomes because of high degrees of protease susceptibility or resistance, respectively. Here we present a means for analysis of in vitro import through a covalent biotin label transfer and employ this method to the import of PEX5C. Label transfer demonstrates that the PEX5C construct is monomeric under the conditions of the import assay. This technique was capable of identifying the PEX5-PEX14 interaction as the first interaction of the import process through competition experiments. Labeling of the peroxisomal protein import machinery by PEX5C demonstrated that this interaction was independent of added cargo protein, and, strikingly, the interaction between PEX5C and the import machinery was shown to be ATP-dependent. These important mechanistic insights highlight the power of label transfer in studying interactions, rather than proteins, of interest and demonstrate that this technique should be applied to future studies of peroxisomal in vitro import.     

Inhibitory Mechanism of an Allosteric Antibody Targeting the Glucagon Receptor

Elevated glucagon levels and increased hepatic glucagon receptor (GCGR) signaling contribute to hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes. We have identified a monoclonal antibody that inhibits GCGR, a class B G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR), through a unique allosteric mechanism. Receptor inhibition is mediated by the binding of this antibody to two distinct sites that lie outside of the glucagon binding cleft. One site consists of a patch of residues that are surface-exposed on the face of the extracellular domain (ECD) opposite the ligand-binding cleft, whereas the second binding site consists of residues in the αA helix of the ECD. A docking model suggests that the antibody does not occlude the ligand-binding cleft. We solved the crystal structure of GCGR ECD containing a naturally occurring G40S mutation and found a shift in the register of the αA helix that prevents antibody binding. We also found that alterations in the αA helix impact the normal function of GCGR. We present a model for the allosteric inhibition of GCGR by a monoclonal antibody that may form the basis for the development of allosteric modulators for the treatment of diabetes and other class B GPCR-related diseases.     

Characterization of Interactions Between and Among Components of the Meiotic Silencing by Unpaired DNA Machinery in Neurospora crassa Using Bimolecular Fluorescence Complementation

Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) is based on the complementation between two nonfluorescent fragments of the yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) when they are united by interactions between proteins covalently linked to them. We have successfully applied BiFC in Neurospora crassa using two genes involved in meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA (MSUD) and observed macromolecular complex formation involving only SAD-1 proteins, only SAD-2 proteins, and mixtures of SAD-1 and SAD-2 proteins.     

Molecular Orbital Study of Hapten–Antibody Interactions

THERE is considerable interest in the application of quantum chemical calculations to pharmacology¹. Quantum mechanical methods can be used to compute submolecular properties, such as charge distribution in a molecule. For a series of compounds eliciting the same type of response a correlation is sought between activity and some function of computed parameters.     

两株中和性抗hTNFa单抗可变区与hTNFa相互作用的计算机模拟及实验研究

在ＳＧＩ图形工作站上，用同源蛋白结构预测的方法，建立了２－株中和性抗ｈＴＮＦα小鼠单抗（１Ｃ３Ｅ６，３Ｆ６Ａ１０）可变区的三结构模型，并在实验研究２株单抗表位表异性的基础上，根据２株单抗与ｈＴＮＦα分子表面的形状、静电性、疏水性、氢键等性质，对２株单抗可变区与ｈＴＮＦα分子的可能结合模式进行了模拟和分析，再根据结合模型，设计并制备了２个ｈＴＮＦα突变体，然后从实验与计算机模拟两方面着手，对比研究了     

A Nonlinearity in the Inhibitory Interactions in the Lateral Eye of Limulus

Receptor units in the eye of the horseshoe crab are more sensitive to lateral inhibition at some levels of excitation than they are at others. As a result, the steady-state inhibition of the response of a given unit is not directly proportional to the response levels of neighboring units. This effect may be represented by the introduction of a nonlinearity in the Hartline-Ratliff system of equations. The nonlinear inhibitory effect appears to increase the operating range of the receptor units.     

Genetic, Physical, and Functional Interactions between the Triphosphatase and Guanylyltransferase Components of the Yeast mRNA Capping Apparatus

We have characterized an essential Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene, CES5, that when present in high copy, suppresses the temperature-sensitive growth defect caused by the ceg1-25 mutation of the yeast mRNA guanylyltransferase (capping enzyme). CES5 is identical to CET1, which encodes the RNA triphosphatase component of the yeast capping apparatus. Purified recombinant Cet1 catalyzes hydrolysis of the γ phosphate of triphosphate-terminated RNA at a rate of 1 s⁻¹. Cet1 is a monomer in solution; it binds with recombinant Ceg1 in vitro to form a Cet1-Ceg1 heterodimer. The interaction of Cet1 with Ceg1 elicits >10-fold stimulation of the guanylyltransferase activity of Ceg1. This stimulation is the result of increased affinity for the GTP substrate. A truncated protein, Cet1(201-549), has RNA triphosphatase activity, heterodimerizes with and stimulates Ceg1 in vitro, and suffices when expressed in single copy for cell growth in vivo. The more extensively truncated derivative Cet1(246-549) also has RNA triphosphatase activity but fails to stimulate Ceg1 in vitro and is lethal when expressed in single copy in vivo. These data suggest that the Cet1-Ceg1 interaction is essential but do not resolve whether the triphosphatase activity is also necessary. The mammalian capping enzyme Mce1 (a bifunctional triphosphatase-guanylyltransferase) substitutes for Cet1 in vivo. A mutation of the triphosphatase active-site cysteine of Mce1 is lethal. Hence, an RNA triphosphatase activity is essential for eukaryotic cell growth. This work highlights the potential for regulating mRNA cap formation through protein-protein interactions.     

The Thrombospondin-related Protein Family of Apicomplexan Parasites: The Gears of the Cell Invasion Machinery

A number of severe diseases of medical and veterinary importance are caused by parasites of the phylum Apicomplexa. These parasites invade host cells using similar subcellular structures, organelles and molecular species. Proteins containing one or more copies of the type I repeat of human platelet thrombospondin (TSP1), are crucial components of both locomotion and invasion machinery. Members of this family have been identified in Eimeria tenella, E. maxima, Toxoplasma gondii, Cryptosporidium parvum and in all Plasmodium species so far analysed. Here, Andrea Crisanti and colleagues discuss the structure, localization and current understanding of the function of TSP family members in the invasion of target cells by apicomplexan parasites.     

Functional Interactions between the DNA Ligase of ESCHERICHIA COLI and Components of the DNA Metabolic Apparatus of T4 Bacteriophage

T4 phage completely defective in both gene 30 (DNA ligase) and the rII gene (function unknown) require at least normal levels of host-derived DNA ligase (E. coli lig gene) for growth. Viable E. coli mutant strains that harbor less than 5% of the wild-type level of bacterial ligase do not support growth of T4 doubly defective in genes 30 and rII (T4 30- rII- mutants). We describe here two classes of secondary phage mutations that permit the growth of T4 30- rII- phage on ligase-defective hosts. One class mapped in T4 gene su30 (Krylov 1972) and improved T4 30- rII- phage growth on all E. coli strains, but to varying degrees that depended on levels of residual host ligase. Another class mapped in T4 gene 32 (helix-destabilizing protein) and improved growth specifically on a host carrying the lig2 mutation, but not on a host carrying another lig- lesion (lig4). Two conclusions are drawn from the work: (1) the role of DNA ligase in essential DNA metabolic processes in T4-infected E. coli is catalytic rather than stoichiometric, and (2) the E. coli DNA ligase is capable of specific functional interactions with components of the T4 DNA replication and/or repair apparatus.     

KORRIGAN1 Interacts Specifically with Integral Components of the Cellulose Synthase Machinery

Cellulose is synthesized by the so called rosette protein complex and the catalytic subunits of this complex are the cellulose synthases (CESAs). It is thought that the rosette complexes in the primary and secondary cell walls each contains at least three different non-redundant cellulose synthases. In addition to the CESA proteins, cellulose biosynthesis almost certainly requires the action of other proteins, although few have been identified and little is known about the biochemical role of those that have been identified. One of these proteins is KORRIGAN (KOR1). Mutant analysis of this protein in Arabidopsis thaliana showed altered cellulose content in both the primary and secondary cell wall. KOR1 is thought to be required for cellulose synthesis acting as a cellulase at the plasma membrane–cell wall interface. KOR1 has recently been shown to interact with the primary cellulose synthase rosette complex however direct interaction with that of the secondary cell wall has never been demonstrated. Using various methods, both in vitro and in planta, it was shown that KOR1 interacts specifically with only two of the secondary CESA proteins. The KOR1 protein domain(s) involved in the interaction with the CESA proteins were also identified by analyzing the interaction of truncated forms of KOR1 with CESA proteins. The KOR1 transmembrane domain has shown to be required for the interaction between KOR1 and the different CESAs, as well as for higher oligomer formation of KOR1.