RNA-binding proteins in plants: the tip of an iceberg?

RNA-binding proteins, which are involved in the synthesis, processing, transport, translation, and degradation of RNA, are emerging as important, often multifunctional, cellular regulatory proteins. Although relatively few RNA-binding proteins have been studied in plants, they are being identified with increasing frequency, both genetically and biochemically. RNA-binding proteins that regulate chloroplast mRNA stability and translation in response to light and that have been elegantly analyzed in Clamydomonas reinhardtii have counterparts with similar functions in higher plants. Several recent reports describe mutations in genes encoding RNA-binding proteins that affect plant development and hormone signaling.     

The role of disorder in RNA binding affinity and specificity

Most RNA-binding modules are small and bind few nucleotides. RNA-binding proteins typically attain the physiological specificity and affinity for their RNA targets by combining several RNA-binding modules. Here, we review how disordered linkers connecting RNA-binding modules govern the specificity and affinity of RNA–protein interactions by regulating the effective concentration of these modules and their relative orientation. RNA-binding proteins also often contain extended intrinsically disordered regions that mediate protein–protein and RNA–protein interactions with multiple partners. We discuss how these regions can connect proteins and RNA resulting in heterogeneous higher-order assemblies such as membrane-less compartments and amyloid-like structures that have the characteristics of multi-modular entities. The assembled state generates additional RNA-binding specificity and affinity properties that contribute to further the function of RNA-binding proteins within the cellular environment.     

Arabidopsis RNA immunoprecipitation

RNA-binding proteins are key regulators of plant gene expression. Consistent with this, the Arabidopsis genome encodes many RNA-binding proteins that are genetically required for normal development and for responding to environmental changes. However, the direct RNA targets and RNA processing events that these RNA-binding proteins control are poorly understood. In order to facilitate the functional characterization of RNA-binding proteins, we have applied the RNA immunoprecipitation assay to Arabidopsis. Working with the U2B"–U2 snRNA interaction as a model experimental system, we show that treatment of intact plants with formaldehyde allows immunocapture of U2 snRNA using antibodies that recognize U2B" fused to the generic GFP tag. When coupled with recent developments in whole-genome tiling arrays and high-throughput next-generation sequencing, this combination of procedures and technology has the potential to allow systematic functional analysis of plant RNA-binding proteins.     

Free RNA-binding cytoplasmic proteins are detected in a labile association with polyribosomes

A special fraction of RNA-binding proteins with a non-specific affinity for RNA is present in the extracts of eukaryotic cells. Earlier these proteins were considered exclusively as a pool of free informosomal proteins. It has been shown that a significant part (about 1/3) of RNA-binding proteins is found in labile association with mono- and polyribosome mass, respectively. The labile-associated proteins dissociate from the complex with mono- and polyribosomes with an increase in the ionic RNA-binding proteins bind to particles due to the non-specific affinity for the exposed part of RNA of mono- and polyribosomes. The decrease of the ionic strength leads to the stabilization of the RNA-binding proteins-polyribosomes complexes and enables purification of these complexes. A direct comparison by the O'Farrell two-dimensional analysis has shown that practically all the proteins that are labile-associated with polyribosomes are present within the preparation of free RNA-binding proteins.     

RNA-binding proteins: modular design for efficient function

Many RNA-binding proteins have modular structures and are composed of multiple repeats of just a few basic domains that are arranged in various ways to satisfy their diverse functional requirements. Recent studies have investigated how different modules cooperate in regulating the RNA-binding specificity and the biological activity of these proteins. They have also investigated how multiple modules cooperate with enzymatic domains to regulate the catalytic activity of enzymes that act on RNA. These studies have shown how, for many RNA-binding proteins, multiple modules define the fundamental structural unit that is responsible for biological function.     

Domains required for nucleic acid binding activities in chloroplast ribonucleoproteins.

Five ribonucleoproteins (or RNA-binding proteins) from tobacco chloroplasts have been identified to date; each of these contains an acidic N-terminal domain (24-64 amino acids) and two conserved RNA-binding domains (82-83 amino acids). All five ribonucleoproteins can bind to ssDNA and dsDNA but show high specificity for poly(G) and poly(U). Here we present the nucleic acid binding activity of each domain using a series of deletion mutant proteins made in vitro from the chloroplast 29 kDa ribonucleoproteins. The acidic domain does not have a positive effect on binding activities and proteins lacking this domain show higher affinities for nucleic acids than the wild-type proteins. Mutant proteins containing single RNA-binding domains can bind to poly(G) and poly(U), though with lower affinities than proteins containing two RNA-binding domains. The spacer region (11-37 amino acids) between the two RNA-binding domains does not interact with poly(G) or poly(U) by itself, but is required for the additive activity of the two RNA-binding domains. Proteins consisting of two RNA-binding domains but lacking the spacer have the same activity as those containing only one RNA-binding domain. Possible roles for each domain in chloroplast ribonucleoproteins are discussed.     

Identifying mRNAs bound by RNA-binding proteins using affinity purification and differential display

Many methods are available and widely used to determine specific proteins that bind to a particular RNA of interest. However, approaches to identify unknown substrate RNAs to which an RNA-binding protein binds and potentially regulates are not as common. In this article we describe a technique termed isolation of specific nucleic acids associated with proteins (SNAAP) that allows the identification of mRNAs associated with a protein. Methods are detailed for expressing and purifying fusion proteins that are used to isolate substrate mRNPs employing differential display technology. Lastly, experiments are described to confirm that the RNAs identified are indeed bonafide substrates for an RNA-binding protein. As the number of known RNA-binding proteins increases, of which many are involved in genetic disorders, it is essential that methodologies exist to identify RNA-protein interactions to better understand the manifestation of disease.     

Partner-specific prediction of RNA-binding residues in proteins: A critical assessment

RNA-protein interactions play essential roles in regulating gene expression. While some RNA-protein interactions are “specific”, that is, the RNA-binding proteins preferentially bind to particular RNA sequence or structural motifs, others are “non-RNA specific.” Deciphering the protein-RNA recognition code is essential for comprehending the functional implications of these interactions and for developing new therapies for many diseases. Because of the high cost of experimental determination of protein-RNA interfaces, there is a need for computational methods to identify RNA-binding residues in proteins. While most of the existing computational methods for predicting RNA-binding residues in RNA-binding proteins are oblivious to the characteristics of the partner RNA, there is growing interest in methods for partner-specific prediction of RNA binding sites in proteins. In this work, we assess the performance of two recently published partner-specific protein-RNA interface prediction tools, PS-PRIP, and PRIdictor, along with our own new tools. Specifically, we introduce a novel metric, RNA-specificity metric (RSM), for quantifying the RNA-specificity of the RNA binding residues predicted by such tools. Our results show that the RNA-binding residues predicted by previously published methods are oblivious to the characteristics of the putative RNA binding partner. Moreover, when evaluated using partner-agnostic metrics, RNA partner-specific methods are outperformed by the state-of-the-art partner-agnostic methods. We conjecture that either (a) the protein-RNA complexes in PDB are not representative of the protein-RNA interactions in nature, or (b) the current methods for partner-specific prediction of RNA-binding residues in proteins fail to account for the differences in RNA partner-specific versus partner-agnostic protein-RNA interactions, or both.     

Arginine methylation of RNA-binding proteins regulates cell function and differentiation

Arginine methylation is a post-translational modification that regulates protein function. RNA-binding proteins are an important class of cell-function mediators, some of which are methylated on arginine. Early studies of RNA-binding proteins and arginine methylation are briefly introduced, and the enzymes that mediate this post-translational modification are described. We review the most common RNA-binding domains and briefly discuss how they associate with RNAs. We address the following groups of RNA-binding proteins: hnRNP, Sm, Piwi, Vasa, FMRP, and HuD. hnRNPs were the first RNA-binding proteins found to be methylated on arginine. The Sm proteins function in RNA processing and germ cell specification. The Piwi proteins are largely germ cell specific and are also required for germ cell production, as is Vasa. FMRP participates in germ cell formation in Drosophila, but is more widely known for its neuronal function. Similarly, HuD plays a role in nervous system development and function. We review the effects of arginine methylation on the function of each protein, then conclude by addressing remaining questions and future directions of arginine methylation as an important and emerging area of regulation.     

Comparison of cytoplasmic informosome proteins with RNA-binding proteins and translation initiation factors from rabbit reticulocytes.

Using one-and two-dimensional electrophoresis, the free and polyribosomal informosome proteins and a preparation of total RNA-binding proteins from rabbit reticulocytes were compared. It was shown that the major proteins of free and polyribosomal informosomes are similar only to the minor components of RNA-binding proteins. On the other hand, the major RNA-binding proteins, two of which are elongation translation factors EF-1L and EF2, can be present in informosome preparations only as minor components. The major proteins of polyribosomal informosomes do not coincide in terms of electrophoretic mobility with initiation factors eIF-2, eIF-2A, eIF-3, eIF-4A and eIF-4B. The major proteins of free informosomes differ in their electrophoretic mobility from initiation factors eIF-2A, eIF-4A and eIF-4B as well as from the alpha- and beta-subunits of initiation factor eIF-2.     

Insights into RNA biology from an atlas of mammalian mRNA-binding proteins

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) determine RNA fate from synthesis to decay. Employing two complementary protocols for covalent UV crosslinking of RBPs to RNA, we describe a systematic, unbiased, and comprehensive approach, termed "interactome capture," to define the mRNA interactome of proliferating human HeLa cells. We identify 860 proteins that qualify as RBPs by biochemical and statistical criteria, adding more than 300 RBPs to those previously known and shedding light on RBPs in disease, RNA-binding enzymes of intermediary metabolism, RNA-binding kinases, and RNA-binding architectures. Unexpectedly, we find that many proteins of the HeLa mRNA interactome are highly intrinsically disordered and enriched in short repetitive amino acid motifs. Interactome capture is broadly applicable to study mRNA interactome composition and dynamics in varied biological settings.     

RNA-protein interactions in vivo: global gets specific

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) impact every process in the cell; they act as splicing and polyadenylation factors, transport and localization factors, stabilizers and destabilizers, modifiers, and chaperones. RNA-binding capacity can be attributed to numerous protein domains that bind a limited repertoire of short RNA sequences. How is specificity achieved in cells? Here we focus on recent advances in determining the RNA-binding properties of proteins in vivo and compare these to in vitro determinations, highlighting insights into how endogenous RNA molecules are recognized and regulated. We also discuss the crucial contribution of structural determinations for understanding RNA-binding specificity and mechanisms.     

Both Sm-domain and C-terminal extension of Lsm1 are important for the RNA-binding activity of the Lsm1-7-Pat1 complex

Lsm proteins are a ubiquitous family of proteins characterized by the Sm-domain. They exist as hexa- or heptameric RNA-binding complexes and carry out RNA-related functions. The Sm-domain is thought to be sufficient for the RNA-binding activity of these proteins. The highly conserved eukaryotic Lsm1 through Lsm7 proteins are part of the cytoplasmic Lsm1-7-Pat1 complex, which is an activator of decapping in the conserved 5'-3' mRNA decay pathway. This complex also protects mRNA 3'-ends from trimming in vivo. Purified Lsm1-7-Pat1 complex is able to bind RNA in vitro and exhibits a unique binding preference for oligoadenylated RNA (over polyadenylated and unadenylated RNA). Lsm1 is a key subunit that determines the RNA-binding properties of this complex. The normal RNA-binding activity of this complex is crucial for mRNA decay and 3'-end protection in vivo and requires the intact Sm-domain of Lsm1. Here, we show that though necessary, the Sm-domain of Lsm1 is not sufficient for the normal RNA-binding ability of the Lsm1-7-Pat1 complex. Deletion of the C-terminal domain (CTD) of Lsm1 (while keeping the Sm-domain intact) impairs mRNA decay in vivo and results in Lsm1-7-Pat1 complexes that are severely impaired in RNA binding in vitro. Interestingly, the mRNA decay and 3'-end protection defects of such CTD-truncated lsm1 mutants could be suppressed in trans by overexpression of the CTD polypeptide. Thus, unlike most Sm-like proteins, Lsm1 uniquely requires both its Sm-domain and CTD for its normal RNA-binding function.     

Mutational analysis of the protein subunits of the signal recognition particle Alu-domain.

Two polypeptides of the murine signal recognition particle (SRP), SRP9 and SRP14, bind exclusively as a heterodimer to SRP RNA and their presence is required for elongation arrest activity of the particle. SRP9/14 also constitute a subunit of small cytoplasmic Alu RNPs. To identify RNA-binding determinants, we assayed the dimerization and RNA-binding capacities of altered proteins in vitro. Despite the structural homology of the two proteins, their requirements for dimerization differ substantially. In SRP9, an internal fragment of 43 amino acids is sufficient to allow dimer formation, whereas in SRP14 only few changes, such as removing an internal loop region, are tolerated without affecting its dimerization activity. The dimerization defect of the SRP14 proteins is most likely explained by a reduced stability or ability to fold of the proteins. Interestingly, SRP RNA can engage certain dimerization-defective SRP14 proteins into stable complexes, suggesting that low-affinity interactions between the RNA and SRP14 may help to overcome the folding defect or the reduced stability of the proteins. We identified two regions, one in each protein, that are essential for RNA-binding. In SRP9, acidic amino acid residues in the N-terminal alpha-helix and the adjacent loop and, in SRP14, a flexible internal loop region are critical for RNA-binding. In the heterodimer, the two regions are located in close proximity, consistent with the RNA-binding region being formed by both proteins.