Current status of the rat prolactin releasing factor

The release of prolactin is governed by both inhibiting and releasing factors. Basal plasma concentration of prolactin is controlled mainly through inhibition by a prolactin release-inhibiting factor (PIF), while acute stimulation of prolactin release is believed to be caused by a prolactin-releasing factor (PRF). It is the general consensus that PIF is dopamine. The PRF plays an important role in stimulation of prolactin release, and there are promising putative PRFs.     

Prolactin secretion in acute stress is controlled by prolactin releasing factor.

Experiments were carried out to demonstrate that the surge of prolactin release with ether stress is due to the release of a prolactin releasing factor rather than an inhibition of release of prolactin inhibiting factor (PIF). When the normal male rat was exposed to ether dopamine (30 ng/10 μl/min), a putative PIF, was infused through the right carotid artery, the prolactin surge still occurred. The elevated circulating prolactin level induced by estradiol implantation was lowered by the infusion of dopamine (30 ng/10 μl/min), indicating that the infused dopamine was reaching the adenohypophysis. The lowered prolactin concentration caused by the infusion of dopamine was elevated by ether stress. The hypothesis that the prolactin surge following ether stress is due to the inhibition of PIF is unlikely since the surge subsequent to ether stress occurred during a constant infusion of the putative PIF, dopamine. We concluded that the prolactin surge is due to the stimulation of PRF secretion rather than an inhibition of PIF secretion.     

Pulsatile secretion of prolactin in the male rat after pimozide administration is not due to pulsatile inhibition of PIF secretion.

Sequential blood samples were taken every 2 min from intact male rats implanted with a permanent indwelling right atrial cannula. The relationship between pimozide dose and prolactin secreation was established by administering graded doses of pimozide (30–3000 μg/kg) as a single bolus injection through the indwelling cannula. The maximum response of prolactin secretion was achieved with 300 μg/kg pimozide. Higher doses of pimozide did not raise further the circulating prolactin concentration suggesting that the receptors for the presumed prolactin inhibiting factor (PIF) were blocked completely at this dose. Marked pulsatile fluctuations in circulating prolactin concentration were observed after administration of pimozide, at all dosages, or of another ‘specific’ dopaminergic receptor blocking agent, d-butaclamol. Since we assume that PIF receptors are completely blocked by the higher doses of pimozide, we conclude that this pulsatile secretion of prolactin cannot be due to the inhibition of PIF secretion but may be due either to the stimulation of prolactin releasing factor (PRF) secretion, or to an inherent rhythmicity in the prolactin secreting cells.     

Evidence that serotonin neurons stimulate secretion of prolaction releasing factor.

The purpose of the present study was to determine if serotonin was stimulatory to prolactin release by inhibition of the dopaminergic system or by stimulating release of a prolactin releasing factor (PRF). We measured the amount of prolactin secreted after administration of 30 mg/kg of 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) to male rats pretreated with fluoxetine (10 mg/kg) and compared it with the amount of prolactin released in male rats treated with αmethyl-p-tyrosine methyl ester (αMT) or various dopamine receptor blocking agents. In every experiment the serotonergic stimulus provided by 5-HTP in fluoxetine-pretreated rats released considerably more prolactin than did treatment with αMT or dopaminergic blockers. We conclude that serotonin releases prolactin not by inhibiting dopaminergic neurons but rather by stimulating the release of PRF.     

Control of prolactin secretion in mammals

Evidence describing the neuroendocrine regulation of prolactin secretion in mammals is reviewed, with focus on catecholamines, serotonin, and polypeptides. Dopamine may be a physiological prolactin inhibiting factor (PIF), while norepinephrine and possibly epinephrine regulate prolactin release at the level of the hypothalamus. Serotonin may participate in the regulation of prolactin secretion by stimulating the release of prolactin releasing factor (PRF). The identity of PRF is not known, but two polypeptides--thyrotropin releasing hormone and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide--can act directly on the adenohypophysis to stimulate prolactin release.     

Stimulation of prolactin secretion by morphine: role of the central serotonergic system.

Unanesthetized male rats with indwellinh right atrial cannulae were injected with morphine (MOR) i.v. which produced a dose-related increase in plasma prolactin levels (PRL). This effect was blocked partially by naloxone (NAL) at a dose of 0.06 mg/kg and totally by 0.6 mg/kg NAL. Interruption of central serotonergic neurotransmission by receptor blockade, with metergoline (MET) or cyproheptadine (Cypro), inhibition of tryptophan hydroxylase by para-chlorophenylalanine or destruction of serotonin neurons by 5, 7-dihydroxytryptamine antagonized the morphine (3 mg/kg) induced elevation in PRL release. Depression of dopaminergic activity with α-methyl-para-tyrosine elevated the basal PRL levels, but it did not prevent a further increase of prolactin levels by morphine (3 mg/kg). These data are compatible with the hypothesis that morphine stimulates PRL release by activation of the central serotonergic system.     

The effects of opiate agonists on growth hormone and prolactin release in rats

Various opioid receptor agonists, including Met5-enkephalin amide, Leu5-enkephalin amide, [D-Ala]2-Met5-enkephalin amide, [D-Ala]2-Leu5-enkephalin amide, morphine sulfate, d-methadone hydrochloride, and l-methadone hydrochloride were administered to adult male rats by subcutaneous injection. All opioid receptor agonists except Leu5-enkephalin amide significantly stimulated growth hormone and prolactin release. Naloxone and naltrexone blocked the hormone stimulatory effects of the opioids and both naloxone and naltrexone, when administered alone, significantly reduced serum growth hormone and prolactin concentrations. The dopaminergic agonist apomorphine, but not the alpha-adrenergic agonist clonidine, blocked opiate stimulation of prolactin. Morphine sulfate caused growth hormone release in rats pretreated with alpha-methyl-p-tryosine, a catecholamine synthesis inhibitor. Cholinergic agonists, physostigmine and pilocarpine, antagonized the growth hormone and prolactin release induced by morphine sulfate. The data suggest that the opiates stimulate prolactin via an interaction with catecholaminergic neurons controlling prolactin release and stimulate growth hormone via a mechanism independent of alpha-adrenergic or general catecholaminergic influence. The mechanism through which cholinergic agonists act to inhibit opiate agonist stimulation of growth hormone is presently unknown.     

Time course of the insensitivity of prolactin release to morphine administration in the lactating female rat

The effect of morphine on circulating levels of prolactin and growth hormone (GH) in the lactating female model was determined at various time intervals following the termination of suckling. Morphine administration did not produce an increase in prolactin levels when dams remained suckling. Four days after suckling was terminated, 50% of the dams tested showed a morphine induced prolactin increase. The prolactin secretory response to morphine gradually returned in dams, so that after 8 days of non-suckling, all animals tested showed a morphine induced prolactin increase. Consistent with the lack of prolactin stimulation, the tuberoinfundibular dopaminergic (TIDA) neurons, were insensitive to the morphine induced inhibition of activity during lactation. In contrast, circulating levels of GH were increased in these dams following morphine administration. These results suggest that the lactating female rat is insensitive to the mu mediated stimulation of prolactin release while suckling. However, sensitivity begins to return following at least 4 days of non-suckling.     

Morphine stimulates prolactin release in normal but not in castrated male rats

Morphine (200 micrograms/rat) was injected intraventricularly (i.v.t.) into normal and into long-term castrated (4 weeks) adult male rats. Animals were killed 10, 20, 40 and 60 min after treatment. In normal animals, the treatment with morphine resulted in a significant increase of serum prolactin concentrations at all time intervals considered. However, the i.v.t. injection of 200 micrograms morphine/rat into castrated rats did not exert any significant effect on prolactin release at any time interval considered. When morphine (200 micrograms/rat) was administered i.v.t. together with the specific opioid receptor blocker naloxone (7.5 or 15 micrograms/rat) the stimulatory effect of morphine on prolactin release was diminished at 10 min, and totally blocked at 20 min. Naloxone given alone did not influence serum prolactin concentrations. The results suggest that the presence of endogenous androgens is essential to permit the stimulatory effect of morphine on prolactin release.     

PRF activity of VIP in vitro (author's transl)

The effect of VIP on prolactin secretion from incubated rat hemipituitaries was characterized. Under these conditions, the secretion of GH, LH, FSH, ACTH was not affected, indicating that the effect of VIP is hormone specific. The stimulation of prolactin was dose-dependent, with an apparent affinity of VIP of 10.9 +/- 3.1 nM and a maximal stimulation of 57.7 +/- 4.2%. Secretin, a structurally related peptide, was also active at higher concentrations, whereas another partial analogue, glucagon, was ineffective. Furthermore, VIP does not act through pituitary DA receptors since alpha-flupentixol, a potent dopaminergic antagonist, does not block the stimulation of prolactin secretion by VIP. In addition, stimulation by VIP and TRH was additive. Naloxone and met-enkephalin were ineffective on the VIP effect on prolactin release. In contrast, SRIF seems to inhibit the VIP stimulation of prolactin release. Our data suggest that VIP, which was found in the hypothalamo-hypophyseal blood at concentrations of the same order of magnitude as that found to stimulate PRL in vitro, could be a physiological PRF.     

Extraction and partial purification of prolactin-release stimulating factor in bovine hypothalami.

Partial purification of prolactin-release stimulating factor (PRF) was performed by Sephadex G-25 gel filtration of bovine hypothalamic extracts. PRF activity was evaluated on the basis of the measurement of immunoreactive prolactin released from the isolated rat hemipituitary in vitro. PRF activity was found in the fractions with Kav=0-0.49 and prolactin-release inhibiting activity was also detected in the fractions with Kav=0.69-0.89. The dose-response relationship was established between the partially purified PRF and its activity. The elution position of the partially purified PRF preceded that of TRH on Sephadex G-25. TRH at the dose of 100 nM stimulated the release of TSH in vitro, but not the release of prolactin. These results may indicate that there exists PRF with a relatively high molecular weight in the bovine hypothalamus.     

Reexamination of dopamine as the prolactin-release inhibiting factor (PIF): supplementary agent may be required for dopamine to function as the physiological PIF

A large number of studies have been performed concerning dopamine's inhibitory effect on prolactin release, but many of these studies have examined the effect of dopamine dissolved in a solution containing ascorbic acid. Ascorbic acid, routinely used to protect dopamine from oxidation, alone does not stimulate or inhibit prolactin release, but it can potentiate the inhibitory effect of dopamine in a static monolayer culture system by approximately 100 times. We have closely examined the inhibitory effect of dopamine on prolactin release in the absence of ascorbic acid using a perifusion system. Male rat adenohypophyses were dispersed with trypsin and cultured in a Petri dish to form cell clusters. Inhibition of prolactin release by dopamine (1 mumol/L) in the absence of ascorbic acid was sustained for only 63 min during the 2-h perifusion period. Following a 2-h period of incubation of dopamine in the same experimental solution, the dopamine concentration was reduced from 1 to 0.18 mumol/L, yet this "2-h-old dopamine" was still effective in inhibiting prolactin release (approximately 30 min). This result suggests that the lactotrophs may be desensitized by chronic exposure to a high concentration of dopamine in the absence of ascorbic acid. In contrast, when a low concentration of dopamine (3 nmol/L) containing ascorbic acid (0.1 mmol/L) was perifused, inhibition of prolactin release was sustained for the entire 2-h perifusion period. Although there may be a large number of explanations for dopamine's transient inhibitory effect on prolactin release, the present results suggest that dopamine may require supplementary agent(s) to effectively inhibit prolactin release and thus function as the prolactin release inhibitory factor (PIF).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Mechanism of prolactin release by 5-hydroxytryptophan

Male Wistar rats were intraperitoneally administered 300 mg/kg b.w. of α-methyl-p-tyrosine methyl ester(α-MT). These α-MT pretreated rats were anesthetized with urethane and then 5% glucose or dopamine (1 μg/kg b.w./min) was infused for 45 min. At 1 min before or 15 min after dopamine infusion, 10 or 50 mg/kg of 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) was injected intraperitoneally, and blood samples were taken from the jugular vein for prolactin determination. In rats treated with α-MT, the administration of 5-HTP increases the serum prolactin level in a dose-related manner. Dopamine infusion caused a marked decrease in serum prolactin level. The concomitant administration of dopamine and 5-HTP prevented the dopamine-induced decrease of serum prolactin in α-MT treated rats. These results indicate that the serotonergic stimulus enhanced prolactin release, not by inhibiting the dopaminergic activity, but by stimulating a prolactin-releasing factor or by activating other neurotransmitter systems.     

Expression of BDNF and TrkB Phosphorylation in the Rat Frontal Cortex During Morphine Withdrawal are NO Dependent

Nitric oxide (NO) mediates pharmacological effects of opiates including dependence and abstinence. Modulation of NO synthesis during the induction phase of morphine dependence affects manifestations of morphine withdrawal syndrome, though little is known about mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. Neurotrophic and growth factors are involved in neuronal adaptation during opiate dependence. NO-dependent modulation of morphine dependence may be mediated by changes in expression and activity of neurotrophic and/or growth factors in the brain. Here, we studied the effects of NO synthesis inhibition during the induction phase of morphine dependence on the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), nerve growth factor (NGF), and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) as well as their receptors in rat brain regions after spontaneous morphine withdrawal in dependent animals. Morphine dependence in rats was induced within 6 days by 12 injections of morphine in increasing doses (10–100 mg/kg), and NO synthase inhibitor L-N^G-nitroarginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (10 mg/kg) was given 1 h before each morphine injection. The expression of the BDNF, GDNF, NGF, IGF1, and their receptors in the frontal cortex, striatum, hippocampus, and midbrain was assessed 40 h after morphine withdrawal. L-NAME treatment during morphine intoxication resulted in an aggravation of the spontaneous morphine withdrawal severity. Morphine withdrawal was accompanied by upregulation of BDNF, IGF1, and their receptors TrkB and IGF1R, respectively, on the mRNA level in the frontal cortex, and only BDNF in hippocampus and midbrain. L-NAME administration during morphine intoxication decreased abstinence-induced upregulation of these mRNAs in the frontal cortex, hippocampus and midbrain. L-NAME prevented from abstinence-induced elevation of mature but not pro-form of BDNF polypeptide in the frontal cortex. While morphine abstinence did not affect TrkB protein levels as well as its phosphorylation status, inhibition of NO synthesis decreased levels of phosphorylated TrkB after withdrawal. Thus, NO signaling during induction of dependence may be involved in the mechanisms of BDNF expression and processing at abstinence, thereby affecting signaling through TrkB in the frontal cortex.     

Pentobarbital anesthesia: interference in the effects of other pharmacological agents and of electrical stimulation on prolactin secretion

In adult male rats, a pretreatment regimen of serial injections of dexamethasone (1 mg/kg), morphine (20 mg/kg) and pentobarbital (40 mg/kg) was evaluated for use in conjunction with studies on the effects of hypothalamic electrical stimulation on prolactin secretion. Serum prolactin levels were measured before and 15 min after electrical and sham stimulation of the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus in rats subjected to either the pharmacological regimen or to pentobarbital anesthesia alone. Pentobarbital alone caused a transient rise in serum prolactin levels, which obscured any effect of electrical or sham stimulation; this interference was not overcome by the addition of dexamethasone and morphine treatment. Thus, the result indicate that the acute stimulatory affect of pentobarbital anesthesia on prolactin release may interfere with further manipulation of prolactin-controlling mechanisms, by either pharmacological or surgical means. Furthermore, the dexamethasone-morphine-pentobarbital pretreated rat does not provide an adequate preparation for studing the effects of electrical stimulation on prolactin secretion.     

The effect of dopamine on the release of prolactin in sheep with lesions of the hypothetical centre producing prolactin inhibiting factor (PIF)

It has been demonstrated in our previous papers that in the anterior part of medial basal hypothalamus (AM BH) in sheep a stimulating, while in the caudal part of MBH (CMBH) an inhibiting centre of prolactin release are situated. These results suggested that CMBH might be the site of PIF production and prompted us to investigate the effect of dopamine (DA) on the concentration of prolactin in the peripheral blood (p.bl.) in animals in which CMBH had been previously lesioned and this concentration was very high. Microinfusion of L-dopamine into the third cerebral ventricle (c.v.) or into the internal maxillary artery in intact as well as in lesioned lactating ewes depressed distinctly the prolactin level in the p.bl. This action of DA suggests that in the CMBH exists dopaminergic system which itself plays an inhibitory role in the control of prolactin release without involvement of PIF.     

Studies of the role of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor in the hypothalamic control of prolactin secretion.

To further examine the role of excitatory amino acids in the control of prolactin (PRL) secretion, the effects of administering a specific agonist and an antagonist of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor on plasma PRL concentrations were examined in the adult male rat. Animals of the Sprague-Dawley strain weighing 250-300 g were implanted with an indwelling cardiac catheter via the right jugular vein. Blood samples were collected through the catheter at 5 min intervals for 40 min, beginning 5 min before the iv administration of drug or the saline vehicle (V). Plasma PRL and luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations were estimated using RIAs. Groups of animals (n = 5-7) received N-methyl-D,L-aspartate (NMA), D,L-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP5), AP5 and NMA, norvaline (NOR), or V. The effects of administering the NMDA receptor antagonist alone were studied on two separate occasions. Injection of NMA (4.5 mg/rat) resulted in unambiguous PRL and LH discharges. Treatment with AP5 (9 mg/rat) 1 min prior to NMA administration completely blocked the LH releasing action of NMA, but did not significantly alter the discharge of PRL. Injection of AP5, alone, generally elicited a distinct and robust discharge of PRL, although plasma LH levels in these animals remained unchanged. NOR, an amino acid structurally related to AP5, administered at a dose (5.3 mg/animal) isomolar to that of AP5, was without effect on PRL and LH secretion, as was injection of V alone. These findings suggest that neuroexcitatory amino acids acting at the NMDA receptor may play a role in modulating the activity of neuronal systems that govern the release of both PRL releasing factor (PRF) and PRL inhibiting factor (PIF) into hypophysial portal blood.     

Ketazocines and morphine: effects on gastrointestinal transit after central and peripheral administration

The mu agonist, morphine, and the prototype kappa agonists, ketocyclazocine and ethylketocyclazocine (EK), were studied for their effects on gastrointestinal transit. Following s.c. administration, both morphine (0.3-3 mg/kg) and ketocyclazocine (0.3-10 mg/kg) antagonized transit of an opaque marker through the small intestines of mice. Morphine (0.1-1 microgram) was also effective after intracerebroventricular (icv) administration in mice whereas ketocyclazocine (0.3-30 micrograms) was not. Similarly, while both morphine (0.3-5 mg/kg) and EK (0.6-10 mg/kg) slowed transit after s.c. injection to rats, only morphine (1-10 micrograms), but not EK (0.3-300 micrograms), was active following icv administration. Icv infusion of the mu benzomorphan, phenazocine (10-100 micrograms), slowed transit in a dose-related manner. These results indicate that there may be an anatomically distinct distribution of receptors for benzomorphan kappa agonists in both the mouse and rat, with these opiate receptors not being located near the lateral cerebral ventricles. The difference in efficacy between morphine and ketazocines in slowing gastrointestinal transit after icv administration to rodents suggests that (a) inactivity in this endpoint is a characteristic of benzomorphan kappa compounds and (b) the model may serve as a useful screen when establishing in vivo profiles of kappa agonists in mice and rats.     

The actions of opiates in the rat substantia nigra: An electrophysiological analysis

Single unit recording and micropressure ejection techniques were used to investigate the actions of opiates on dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic neurons in the rat substantia nigra. Systemic administration of morphine, 1 to 4 mg/kg, led to a naloxone-reversible increase in firing rate of all zona compacta dopaminergic (ZC) neurons examined (n=10). In a specifically defined subpopulation of non-dopaminergic nigral zona reticulata (ZR) neurons, systemically administered morphine led to a naloxone reversible decrease in activity (n=9). D-Ala²-d-leu⁵ (DADL)-enkephalin, when applied directly onto ZC neurons by micropressure ejection techniques, had no effect on their firing rate. In contrast, micropressure ejection of DADL enkephalin onto ZR neurons produced a decrease in firing rate which was blocked by systemically administered naloxone. Morphine sulfate applied by pressure ejection onto both ZC and ZR neurons produced mixed results which were not always blocked by naloxone. These results suggest that one of the mechanisms by which opiates increase dopaminergic neurotransmission is through disinhibition of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra.     

Leu-enkephalin-stimulated growth hormone and prolactin release in the rat: comparison with the effect of morphine

The effect of Leu⁵-enkephalin on growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) release was studied $\text{in vivo}$ in the infant rat and compared to that of morphine. In 10 day-old pups, intracerebroventricular injection of Leu⁵-enkephalin (50, 75 and 100 μg) resulted in a dose-related increase in plasma GH; morphine was active as GH releaser at the dose of 5 and 10 μg, but not at 2.5 μg. Pretreatment with naloxone (2 mg/kg ip) suppressed the GH-releasing effect of either Leu⁵-enkephalin (100 μg) or morphine (10 μg). Leu⁵-enkephalin (75 and 100 μg) induced a rise in plasma PRL which was neither dose-related nor antagonized by naloxone; morphine (5 and 10 μg) was active as PRL releaser and its effect was antagonized by naloxone. These results indicate that: 1) Leu⁵-enkephalin stimulates both GH and PRL release; 2) the release of GH by Leu⁵-enkephalin but likely not that of PRL involves specific opiate receptors; 3) morphine releases GH and PRL through specific opiate receptors.