Risky decisions: a test of risk sensitivity in socially foraging flocks of Lonchura punctulata

Group foraging allows for individuals to exploit the food discoveriesof other group members. If searching for food and searchingfor exploitation opportunities within a group are mutually exclusivealternatives, the decision to use one or the other is modeledas a producer-scrounger game because the value of each alternativeis frequency dependent. Stochastic producer-scrounger modelsgenerally assume that producer provides a more variable anduncertain reward than does the scrounger and hence is a riskierforaging alternative. Socially foraging animals that are attemptingto reduce their risk of starvation should therefore alter theiruse of producer and scrounger alternatives in response to changesin energy budget. We observed flocks of nutmeg mannikins (L.punctulata) foraging in an indoor aviary to determine whethertheir use of producer and scrounger alternatives were risk sensitive.Analyses of the foraging rewards of three flocks of seven birdsconfirm that producer is a riskier foraging strategy than isscrounger, although the difference in risk is rather small.We then submitted two other flocks to two different energy budgetsand observed the foraging decision of four focal birds in eachflock. All but one bird increased their relative use of theriskier producer strategy in the low food reserve treatment,but the overall use of producer did not differ significantlybetween treatments, providing evidence for a small but consistenteffect.     

Risk-sensitive foraging in rats: the effects of response-effort and reward-amount manipulations on choice behavior

The literature on risk-sensitive foraging theory provides several accounts of species that fluctuate between risk-averse and risk-prone strategies. The daily energy budget rule suggests that shifts in foraging strategy are precipitated by changes in the forager's energy budget. Researchers have attempted to alter the organism's energy budget using a variety of techniques such as food deprivation, manipulation of ambient temperatures, and delays to food reward; however, response-effort manipulations have been relatively neglected. A choice preparation using a wheel-running response and rats examined risk-sensitive preferences when both response effort and reward amounts were manipulated. Concurrently available reinforcement schedules (FI/60 and VI/60) yielded equivalent food amounts per unit time in all treatments. Two levels of response effort (20 or 120 g tangential resistance) and two levels of reward amount (three or nine pellets) were combined to form four distinct response-effort/reward-amount pairings. Increasing reward amounts significantly shifted choice toward the FI schedule in both response-effort conditions. The incidence of choice preference and the magnitude of shifts in choice were greater for the high response-effort conditions than for the low response-effort conditions. Implications of the significant interaction between response effort and reward amount are discussed in terms of a general energy-budget model.     

Risk-Sensitive Foraging in a Patch Departure Context: A Test with Worker Bumble Bees

Typically, tests of risk-sensitive foraging involve observinga subject's choices of alternative prey types differing in somecombination of mean and variance of expected foraging gain.Here, we consider the problem of risk-sensitive foraging whenthere is a single prey type. We observed worker bumble bees(Bombus occidentalis) foraging in an array of artificial 2-flowerinflorescences. After visiting the bottom flower in an inflorescenceand obtaining a reward of some size, the bee decides whetherto visit the top flower or to move to a new inflorescence (apatch departure). Here, risk-sensitive behavior is expressedas the forager's choice of patch departure threshold (PDT) ofreward obtained in the bottom flower. We measured the PDTs ofbees whose colony energy stores (and therefore energy requirements)had been manipulated (Enhanced or Depleted). Simulations ledus to predict that shortfall-minimizing bees should decreasetheir PDTs when their colony energy reserves were depleted,relative to when the reserves were enhanced. Bees did not usea strict patch departure threshold, but instead the probabilityof departure varied with nectar volume in the bottom flower.Colony energy stores did affect patch departure behavior, butthis effect was confounded by the order in which manipulationof colony reserves was applied. Further, simulations of observedbee patch departure decisions did not produce behavior expectedif the decisions were based on shortfall-minimization. We concludethat a bee's decision of when to leave an inflorescence is notpredicted by a static shortfall-minimizing model. Our resultsalso implicate an important interaction between learning andforaging requirements. We review risk-sensitivity in bees, anddiscuss why risk-sensitive foraging may be adaptive for bumblebees.     

Aspects of risk-aversion in foraging white-crowned sparrows

Two series of aviary experiments with white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys) are reported. The first series attempts to mimic foraging choices between microhabitats. The second series examines foraging choices made within a single artificial patch, a design intended to resemble dietary selection. In all experiments subjects chose between a constant food reward and a variable reward, the mean of which equalled the constant reward. Each experiment allowed the bird to feed at an overall rate greater than that minimally required for daily energy balance. In both series of experiments, the birds usually preferred the constant reward. Results of the first series do not differ significantly from previously reported preferences of dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis), birds weighing 10 g less than the white-crowned sparrows.     

Flower Choice and Learning in Foraging Bumblebees: Effects of Variation in Nectar Volume and Concentration

Bees collect food from flowers that differ in morphology, color, and scent. Nectar‐seeking foragers can rapidly associate a flower's cues with its profitability, measured as caloric value or ‘net energy gain,’ and generally develop preferences for more profitable species. If two flower types are equally easy to discover and feed from, differences in profitability will arise from differences in the volume or the sugar concentration of their nectar crops. Although there has been much study of how bees respond to one or the other of these two kinds of nectar variation, few studies have considered both at once. We presented free‐foraging bumblebees with two different types of equally rewarding artificial flowers. After a period of familiarization, we made one type more rewarding than the other by increasing its nectar concentration, volume, or both. Bees responded more rapidly to a change in the reward's sugar concentration than to a change in its volume, even if the profitability differences were approximately equal. Sucrose concentration differences (40% vs. 13%) caused bees to virtually abandon the more dilute flower type, whether both types offered the same volume (2 μl) or the less concentrated reward offered higher volume (7 μl vs. 0.85 μl). When the two types of flower differed only in nectar volume (7 μl vs. 0.85 μl), the less rewarding type continued to receive 22% of the visits. We propose three different hypotheses to explain the stronger response of the bees to changes in sugar concentration: (i) their response threshold to sucrose concentration might change; (ii) less time is needed to assess the concentration of a reward than its volume; and (iii) a smaller sample size may be needed for reliable estimation of profitability when flowers differ in concentration.     

Learning to Choose Among Social Foraging Strategies in Adult House Sparrows (Passer domesticus)

Social foragers may be regarded as being engaged in a producer–scrounger game in which they can search for food independently or join others who have discovered food. Research on the producer–scrounger game has focused mainly on the different factors influencing its evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) solution, but very little is known about the actual mechanisms that shape players' decisions. Recent work has shown that early experience can affect producer–scrounger foraging tendencies in young house sparrows and that in nutmeg mannikins learning is involved in reaching the ESS. Here, we show that direct manipulation of the success rate experienced by adult sparrows when following others can change their strategy choice on the following day. We presented to live sparrows an experimental regime, where stuffed adult house sparrows in a feeding position were positioned on a foraging grid that included two reward regimes: a positive one, in which the stuffed models were placed near food, and a negative one, in which the models were placed away from food. There was a significant increase in joining behavior after the positive treatment (exhibited by 84% of the birds), but no change after the negative treatment. Further analysis demonstrated that sparrows more frequently used the strategy with which they were more successful (usually joining) and that differences in strategy use were correlated with differences in success. These results suggest that adult birds can monitor their success and learn to choose among social foraging strategies in the producer–scrounger game.     

Energetic constraints and foraging efficiency

Previous research considers foraging options that differ interms of their gross rate of gain b and rate of energy expenditurec. This research argues that maximizing efficiency b/c willmaximize net energetic gain when there is an upper limit onthe amount of energy that can be assimilated. This analysisdoes not include the expenditure during the time for which theanimal is unable to forage because of this constraint. Whenthis expenditure is included, maximizing efficiency is no longeroptimal. Instead the best feeding option is the one with thehighest value of b/(c – c₁), where c, is the metabolicrate when the animal is not foraging.     

Olfactory learning in the stingless bee Tetragonisca angustula (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini)

Tetragonisca angustula stingless bees are considered as solitary foragers that lack specific communication strategies. In their orientation towards a food source, these social bees use chemical cues left by co-specifics and the information obtained in previous foraging trips by the association of visual stimuli with the food reward. Here, we investigated their ability to learn the association between odors and reward (sugar solution) and the effect on learning of previous encounters with scented food either inside the hive or during foraging. During food choice experiments, when the odor associated with the food was encountered at the feeding site, the bees’ choice is biased to the same odor afterwards. The same was not the case when scented food was placed inside the nest. We also performed a differential olfactory conditioning of proboscis extension response with this species for the first time. Inexperienced bees did not show significant discrimination levels. However, when they had had already interacted with scented food inside the hive, they were able to learn the association with a specific odor. Possible olfactory information circulation inside the hive and its use in their foraging strategies is discussed.     

Interruptions to foraging and learning in a changing environment

Many resources are both stochastic and variable in their average profitability. Animals have to sample them to track their current states, but whether it is economic to attempt this depends on many factors. Furthermore, there are many interruptions and distractions from foraging (e.g. escape from predators, bad weather, displacement by competitors) which interfere with the acquisition of information. We present a dynamic model of foraging in a stochastic and varying environment, under the constant threat of interruption, to investigate this very general problem. A forager faces two foraging options, one of which provides a known and constant reward, the other providing a reward that is not only stochastic, but whose mean payoff varies in time. The forager has to learn which option has the highest current payoff by sampling. However, interruptions to foraging can occur at any time, the timing and duration of which are beyond the animal's control. When there is a small probability of foraging being interrupted, the forager should forage extensively on the unknown option, but as the probability of interruptions is increased, there is a sudden transition to foraging only on the known option. This occurs because interruptions affect both the level of information required to make exploitation of the unknown option profitable, and the ability to acquire and maintain that information. At what probability of being interrupted this threshold emerges is affected by the value of learning about the unknown option and the duration of interruptions. We discuss the generality of our results with reference to the pervasive problem of updating information in the face of different types of interruption. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.     

Preference in patchy landscapes: the influence of scale-specific intake rates and variance in reward

Understanding the responses of foragers to patchy distributionsof resources has formed a fundamental challenge in behavioralecology. Two currencies have been used to assess the patch preferencesof herbivores—intake rate maximization and risk sensitivity.We wished to understand if small mammalian foragers, collaredlemmings (Dichrostonyx groenlandicus), choose patches to maximizefood intake rate or to reduce risk of starvation in "variable"environments. Moreover, we examined the possibility that maximizingintake rate depends on the spatial scale of patchiness. We designedan experiment offering two alternative patches of food, varyingthe predictability of food rewards and the "potential intakerate" at different spatial scales. Collared lemmings did notconsistently select patches that maximized their intake rateat either scale studied. Instead, they chose patches offeringthe least variation in food reward over the course of the experiment.Collared lemmings used prior knowledge gained from previousforaging bouts to assess food variability. We interpret theseresults as evidence for risk-averse foraging strategies, whichare predicted for continuous foragers aiming to minimize riskof starvation.     

Cue use affects resource subdivision among three coexisting hummingbird species

Competition for food can influence the coexistence of speciesvia habitat selection, and learned behavior can influence foragingdecisions. I investigated whether learned behavior and competitionact together to influence species interactions between threecoexisting hummingbird species: black-chinned (Archilochusalexandri), blue-throated (Lampornis clemenciae), and magnificent(Eugenes fulgens) hummingbirds. I found that color cue useby individuals affects not only their foraging choices butalso population-level responses to competition. I presented hummingbirds two types of habitats (rich and poor feeders).All birds shared a preference for the rich feeders, but shiftedpreference toward poor feeders in response to competition.I used color cues to manipulate the amount of information availableto birds and examined the effects of two information states(complete or incomplete) on their foraging choices. I examined hummingbirds' preferences for the rich feeders when both competitordensities and information varied. To relate foraging choicesto energetic intake, I also analyzed energy gained during asingle foraging bout. Males of all species exhibited strongpreferences for rich feeders when they foraged with complete information and low competitor densities. Without complete information,the two subordinate species (black-chinned and magnificent)shifted preference away from rich feeders in response to highdensities of the dominant species (blue-throated). Each subordinatespecies shifted in a unique way: black-chinned hummingbirdsreduced foraging efficiency, while magnificent hummingbirdsreduced foraging time. Birds foraging with complete information remained selective on rich feeders even at high competitor densities.Thus, learned information affected competitive interactions(for rich feeders) among these species.     

Comparative performance of orangutans (Pongo spp.), gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla), and drills (Mandrillus leucophaeus), in an ephemeral foraging task

A goal of the comparative approach is to test a variety of species on the same task. Here, we examined whether the factors that helped capuchin monkeys improve their performance in a dichotomous choice task would generalize to three other primate species: orangutans, gorillas, and drill monkeys. In this task, subjects have access to two options, each resulting in an identical food, but one (the ephemeral option) is only available if it is chosen first, whereas the other one (the permanent option) is always available. Therefore, the food‐maximizing solution is to choose the ephemeral option first, followed by the permanent option for an additional reward. On the original version (plate task), the options were discriminated by the color and pattern of the plates holding the food, while on two subsequent versions we used altered cues that we predicted would improve performance: (1) the color of the foods themselves (color task), which we hypothesized was relevant to primates, who choose foods rather than substrates on which foods are found when foraging, and (2) patterned cups covering the foods (cup task), which we hypothesized would help primates avoid the prepotent response associated with visible food. Like capuchins, all three species initially failed to solve the plate task. However, while orangutans improved their performance from the plate to the color task, they did not for the cup task, and only a few gorillas and no drills succeeded in either task. Unfortunately, our ability to interpret these data was obscured by differences in the subjects' level of experience with cognitive testing and practical constraints that precluded the use of completely identical procedures across species. Nonetheless, we consider what these results can tell us, and discuss the value of conducting studies across multiple sites despite unavoidable differences.     

Effects of experience on food-searching behavior in the antFormica schaufussi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Foragers of the ant Formica schaufussitend to return to and search at a site of a previous food find. The search tactic employed by a forager on its return trip is related to the type of food previously encountered: search is more persistent in response to carbohydrate than to protein food. Using different reinforcement schedules with carbohydrate and protein food rewards, we show that, on a short-term as well as on a long-term basis, the basic pattern of search observed in naive foragers is only slightly modified through foraging experience. Foragers do not increase their search effort or adjust their search pattern when either type of food is systematically renewed on a fixed reward schedule and thus do not seem to be able to learn to assess the food predictability. Collective responses that could compensate for this lack of individual flexibility and increase foraging efficiency at the colony level are discussed.     

Do kleptoparasites reduce their own foraging effort in order to detect kleptoparasitic opportunities?: An empirical test of a key assumption of kleptoparasitic models

Determining if, or when, individuals trade off time spent personally feeding against time spent monitoring others for kleptoparasitism opportunities is essential to an understanding of the evolution of scrounging and usurpation behaviours. We provide a first field test of whether kleptoparasites reduce their personal foraging effort in situations where the frequency and rewards of kleptoparasitism increase. We provided experimental food patches for wild European blackbirds that varied in the distribution of prey and that had a potentially high rate of kleptoparasitism within pairs of blackbirds feeding in them. Although individuals differed in their rate of kleptoparasitism, they did not vary in the size of the reward that they gained from kleptoparasitism. As prey became more clumped, kleptoparasitism rate and its reward per incident increased on average. There was, however, no evidence that individuals that were kleptoparasitising more quickly and/or at a higher frequency had lower personal foraging effort. In contrast, foraging effort increased in both birds compared to when they were foraging alone, independent of dominance, kleptoparasitic opportunity or reward. Our evidence suggests that in some circumstances a kleptoparasite can detect kleptoparasitic opportunities without compromising its own personal foraging rate.     

Pre- and postdispersal seed predation by rodents: balance of food and safety

Seed presentation and availability for seed predators changeduring every plant reproductive cycle. We know very little abouthow those changes impinge on both the ability of seed predatorsto impact plant populations and the foraging costs associatedwith seed consumption. Therefore, we conducted several fieldexperiments to evaluate whether wood mice Apodemus sylvaticusbalance food and safety while foraging on Helleborus foetidusseeds during both the pre- and early postdispersal phases ofthe plant reproductive cycle. Both food and safety were keydeterminants of mouse foraging on H. foetidus seeds, thoughtheir roles were not consistent along the plant reproductivecycle. Thus, augmenting ambient food reduced fruit removal bymice during the predispersal phase. During the postdispersalphase, seeds in sheltered microsites experienced higher removalrates than those located in nonsheltered microsites; however,no effect of food augmentation was detected. This apparent reversedrole of food and safety on decision making by mice seemed closelylinked to both the dramatic changes in accessibility and presentationof H. foetidus seeds and the coupled changing foraging costsfaced by mice at different phases of the plant reproductivecycle. For instance, because the cost of foraging for predispersalseeds was higher than for postdispersal seeds, the effect offood augmentation on foraging by wood mice was greater duringthe predispersal phase. Thus, our study illustrates the needof considering differences between pre- and postdispersal seedpredation in the study of granivore rodents and their impacton plant populations.     

Background context and decision making in hoarding gray jays

If decision makers assign stable fitness-related values to options, preference for the most valuable of simultaneously encounteredoptions should be independent of background context (i.e.,prior options). The tendency to choose optionx versus y shouldbe unaffected by whether the decision maker has already beengiven a choice betweenx' and y' or between x' and y'. Here, food-hoarding gray jays (Perisoreus canadensis) were given aninitial choice between x' (one raisin, 0.5 m into a tube) and y' (three raisins, 0.5 m) or between x' and y' (both identicalto x'). All subjects were then given a choice between x' (oneraisin, 0.3 m) and y' (three raisins, 0.7 m). In violationof the principle of irrelevant alternatives, the "market share"ofx depended on prior options. Subjects initially exposed tocontext {x', y'} showed a stronger preference for x than did subjects initially exposed to {x', y'}, which implies thatthe jays did not assign a fixed value to each option. Subjectsthat initially could obtain a large reward (y') for about thesame "price" (perceived danger) as a small reward (x') apparentlydevalued the large reward (y) in the subsequent choice. Thiseffect may be the joint byproduct of cognitive constraints andan adaptive tendency to use information provided by the context.     

Honeybee (Apis mellifera ligustica) Response to Differences in Handling Time, Rewards and Flower Colours

Free flying honeybees were tested outdoors on blue–white and blue–yellow dimorphic artificial flower patches to examine the influence of reward difference, flower handling‐time difference and flower colour choice on foraging decisions. We employed different flower‐well depths to vary handling times (costs), and differences in sucrose molarity to vary reward quality. Tests were performed with 2 and 6 μl rewards to vary quantity. We show that when handling time is correlated with flower‐colour morphs on a pedicellate artificial flower patch, a honeybee's foraging behaviour is dependent on the flower colours used in the choice tests. This supports a honeybee foraging model where constraints are a significant factor in decision making. Bees visiting blue–yellow flower patches exhibited flower constancy to colour, where they restricted most visits to a single flower colour, some bees to blue and others to yellow, irrespective of handing time differences. When offered a choice of equally rewarding blue or white flowers, bees were not constrained by flower colour and chose to visit flowers with a lower handling time. When reward molarity varied with well depth between blue and white flowers, foragers chose shallow‐well flowers (short‐handling time) with a smaller net harvest rate over deep‐well flowers (long‐handling time) with a greater net harvest rate. Results using the blue–white dimorphic flower patch suggest that when foraging options simultaneously involve reward and handling‐time choices, honeybee forager behaviour is inconsistent with an absolute method of evaluating profit.     

Inter‐individual variation in honey bee dance intensity correlates with expression of the foraging gene

Individual behavioural differences in responding to the same stimuli is an integral part of division of labour in eusocial insect colonies. Amongst honey bee nectar foragers, individuals strongly differ in their sucrose responsiveness, which correlates with strong differences in behavioural decisions. In this study, we explored whether the mechanisms underlying the regulation of foraging are linked to inter‐individual differences in the waggle dance activity of honey bee foragers. We first quantified the variation in dance activity amongst groups of foragers visiting an artificial feeder filled consecutively with different sucrose concentrations. We then determined, for these foragers, the sucrose responsiveness and the brain expression levels of three genes associated with food search and foraging; the foraging gene Amfor, octopamine receptor gene AmoctαR1 and insulin receptor AmInR‐2. As expected, foragers showed large inter‐individual differences in their dance activity, irrespective of the reward offered at the feeder. The sucrose responsiveness correlated positively with the intensity of the dance activity at the higher reward condition, with the more responsive foragers having a higher intensity of dancing. Out of the three genes tested, Amfor expression significantly correlated with dance activity, with more active dancers having lower expression levels. Our results show that dance and foraging behaviour in honey bees have similar mechanistic underpinnings and supports the hypothesis that the social communication behaviour of honey bees might have evolved by co‐opting behavioural modules involved in food search and foraging in solitary insects.     

Colour association influences honey bee choice between sucrose concentrations

Certain colours associated with floral food resources are more quickly learned by honey bees (Apis mellifera) than are other colours. But the impact of colour, and other floral cues, on bee choice behaviour has not yet been determined. In these experiments, colour association and sugar concentration of reward were varied to assess how they interact to affect bee choice behaviour. Thirty-five bees were individually given binary choices between blue and yellow artificial flowers that contained either the same rewards or rewards of different sucrose concentrations. Honey bee choice between sucrose concentrations was affected by colour association and this effect was greatest when absolute difference between rewards was the lowest. The honey bee's ability to maximize energetic profitability during foraging is constrained by floral cue effectiveness.