A comparative study of the spectroscopy and oxidative spectroelectrochemistry of a series of homo- and heterobimetallic Ru(II) and Os(II) polypyridine complexes

A spectroscopic and spectroelectrochemical comparison is made among homo- and heterobimetallic complexes of the form [(bpy)₂Ru(BL)Os(byp)₂]⁴⁺, [(bpy)₂Ru(BL)Ru(bpy)₂]⁴⁺ and [(bpy)₂Os(BL)Os(bpy)₂]⁴⁺ (BL = 2,3,-bis(2′-pyridyl)pyrazzine(dpp),2,3-bis(2′-pyridyl)quinoxaline(dpq) or 2,3-bis(2′-pyridyl)benzoquinoxaline(dpb); bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine). It has been postulated that the spectroscopy of the mixed-metal bimetallic complexes bridged by polyazine bridging ligands can be assigned by comparison to those of the homobimetallic analogs. We have in hand a unique series of complexes where such a postulate can be tested. Utilizing the visible spectra of the homobimetallic Os,Os and Ru,Ru systems, we have been able to generate the spectra of the mixed-metal complexes. Some differences have been seen, particularly in the energy of the Os → dpp ³MLCT. Oxidative spectroelectrochemistry studies on the homobimetallic ruthenium or osmium based systems indicate that upon complete oxidation of both metal centers, transitions in the visible are lost. Hence, partial oxidation of the ruthenium based homobimetallics and Os, Ru mixed-metal bimetallics allows for the direct comparison of the spectroscopic character of the one remaining ruthenium chromophore within these mixed-valence systems. Oxidation to form the Os(III)/Ru(II) species and the Ru(III)/Ru(II) species resulted in similar spectra. This establishes further that the visible spectroscopy of mixed-metal systems of this nature can be accurately interpreted by comparison to the homobimetallic analogs.     

Preparation and crystal structure of trans-dihydroxo-[tetrakis(2,6-dichlorophenyl)porphinato]ruthenium(IV)·2toluene

Trans-dihydroxo-[tetrakis(2,6-dichlorophenyl)porphinato]ruthenium(IV) ([Ru(OH)₂(TDCPP)]) was prepared by meta-chloroperbenzoic acid oxidation of [Ru(CO)(TDCPP)] in dichloromethane-toluene, and its crystal structure is reported. Crystal data for [Ru(OH)₂(TDCPP)]·2toluene:C₄₄H₂₂N₄O₂Cl₈Ru·2C₇H₈, orthorhombic, space group Pbca a = 13.149(1), B = 19.893(2), C = 21.093(2)Å, U = 55.17.3(2) ų, Z = 4. The short axial Ru---O bond distance, 1.790(7) Å, is in the range expected for a double Ru(IV)-oxygen bond. Both hydroxo ligands are approximately located in the mean plane of two opposite dichlorophenyl groups. Full-matrix least-squares refinement of positional and thermal parameters, using 2368 unique reflections with F > 2.5 σ (F) led to R(F) = 0.063; R_w = 0.066.     

Effect of ruthenium precursor on hydrogen-treated active carbon supported ruthenium catalysts for ammonia synthesis

Active carbon (A.C.), after treatment at 1123 K with hydrogen for more than 24 h, was found to be very effective as a support for ruthenium catalysis in ammonia synthesis. The activity of barium promoted Ru catalysts supported on this treated A.C. is affected remarkably by the Ru precursor. Ru₃(CO)₁₂ was found previously to be the most effective Ru precursor for oxide supports such as Al₂O₃, MgO, and CeO₂ in ammonia synthesis. However, in this study, the Ru---Bao/A.C. catalyst prepared from Ru(acac)₃ was found to yield the highest activity, while the catalyst prepared from Ru₃(CO)₁₂ resulted in the lowest activity among several precursors. Transmission electron microscopy and hydrogen chemisorption showed that the particle size of Ru obtained from the decomposition of Ru(acac)₃ on hydrogen-treated A.C. is smaller than the particle size of Ru obtained from the decomposition of Ru₃(CO)₁₂. Additionally, RuCl₃ was found to be an effective precursor for Ru/A.C. catalyst. It has been suggested that chlorine ions can be removed easily from A.C. by hydrogen reduction at 773 K, and that this results in the high activity.     

Synthesis and reactivity of coordinatively unsaturated osmium and ruthenium stannyl complexes

Treatment of MHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃ (M=Ru, Os) with (CH₂=CH)SnR₃ is a good general route to the coordinatively unsaturated osmium and ruthenium stannyl complexes M(SnR₃)Cl(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (1: M=Ru, R=Me; 2: M=Ru, R = n-butyl; 3: M=Ru, R = p-tolyl; 4: M=Os, R=Me). These coordinatively unsaturated complexes readily add CO and CN-p-tolyl to form the coordinatively saturated compounds M(SnR₃)Cl(CO)L(PPh₃)₂ (5: M=Ru, R=Me, L=CO; 6: M=;Ru, R = n-butyl, L=CO; 7: M=Ru, R = p-tolyl, L=CO; 8: M=Os, R=Me, L=CO; 9: M=Ru, R=Me, L=CN-p-tolyl; 10: M=Ru, R = n-butyl, L=CN-p-tolyl; 11: M=Os, R=Me, L=CN-p-tolyl). In addition, the chloride ligand in Ru(SnR₃)Cl(CO)(PPh₃)₂ proves to be labile and treatment with the potentially bidentate anionic ligands, dimethyldithiocarbamate or diethyldithiocarbamate, affords the coordinatively saturated compounds Ru(SnR₃)(η²-S₂CNR′₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (12: R=Me, R′ = Me; 13: R=Me, R′ = Et; 14: R = n-butyl, R′ = Me; 15: R = p-tolyl, R′ = Me; 16: R = p-tolyl, R′ = Et). Chloride is also displaced by carboxylates forming the six-coordinate compounds Ru(SnR₃)(η²-O₂CR′)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (17: R=Me, R′ = H; 18: R=Me, R′ = Me; 19: R=Me, R′ = Ph; 20: R = n-butyl, R′ = Me; 21: R = p-tolyl, R′ = Me). IR and ¹H NMR spectral data for all the new compounds and ³¹P and ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectral data for selected compounds are reported.     

The use of the borocaptate anion as a ligand. Synthesis and X-ray crystal structure of pentaammine (1-thiolato-closo-undecahydrododecaborane)ruthenium(III) dihydrate

The complex [Ru(SB₁₂H₁₁)(NH₃)₅]·2H₂O has been prepared by the reaction of Cs₂B₁₂H₁₁SH with [RuCl(NH₃)₅]Cl₂ in aqueous solution. The complex represents the first reported example of the borocaptate anion acting as a ligand. The structure of the complex has been determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. The crystal parameters are monoclinic, space group P2₁/c, A = 8.056(1), B = 14.240(2), C = 15.172(2) Å, β=98.48° and Z = 4. The ruthenium atom has a distorted octahedral coordination. The distortion is probably due to the high (3⁻) charge and the large bulk of the borocaptate ligand. These features can also be observed in the spectroscopic properties of the complex.     

Kinetics and mechanism of the oxidation of ammineruthenium(II) complexes by bromine

The reactions of Ru(NH₃)₅py²⁺, Ru(NH₃)₄bpy²⁺, Ru₂(NH₃)₁₀pz⁵⁺, RuRh(NH₃)₁₀pz⁵⁺ and Ru(NH₃)₅pz²⁺ with bromine are first-order in ruthenium and first-order in bromine. The rates decrease with increasing bromide ion concentration and, except for Ru(NH₃)₅pz²⁺, are independent of hydrogen ion concentration. The reactions are postulated to proceed via outer-sphere, one-electron transfer from Ru(II) to Br₂ with the formation of Br₂⁻ as a reactive intermediate. The bromide inhibition is ascribed to the formation of Br₃⁻ which is unreactive in outer-sphere reactions because of the barrier imposed by the need to undergo reductive cleavage. The reaction of Ru(NH₃)₅pz²⁺ is inhibited by hydrogen ions. The hydrogen ion dependence shows that Ru(NH₃)₅pzH³⁺ has a pK_a of 2.49 and is at least 500 times less reactive than Ru(NH₃)₅pz²⁺. The reaction of Ru₂(NH₃)₁₀pz⁴⁺ with bromine is biphasic. The second phase has a rate identical to that of the Ru₂(NH₃)₁₀pz⁵⁺-Br₂ reaction. A detailed analysis shows that the reaction of Ru₂(NH₃)₁₀pz⁴⁺ with bromine proceeds by a sequence of one-electron steps, Br₂⁻ being produced as an intermediate. A linear free energy relationship between rate constants and equilibrium constants, obeyed for all the reactions studied, provides an estimate of 1.5 × 10² M⁻¹ s⁻¹ for the self-exchange rate constant of the Br₂/Br₂⁻ couple.     

Synthesis, spectral studies and in vitro assessment for antiamoebic activity of new cyclooctadiene ruthenium(II) complexes with 5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazones

We report here the synthesis, characterization and in vitro antiamoebic activity of 5-nitrothiophene-2-carboxaldehyde thiosemicarbazones (TSC), 1–5, and their bidentate complexes [Ru(η⁴-C₈H₁₂)(TSC)Cl₂] 1a–5a. The biological studies of these compounds were investigated against HK-9 strain of Entamoeba histolytica and the concentration causing 50% cell growth inhibition (IC₅₀) was calculated in the micromolar range. The ligands exhibited antiamoebic activity in the range (2.05–5.29 μM). Screening results indicated that the potencies of the compounds increased by the incorporation of ruthenium(II) in the thiosemicarbazones. The complexes 1a–5a showed antiamoebic activity with an IC₅₀ of 0.61–1.43 μM and were better inhibitors of growth of E. histolytica, based on IC₅₀ values. The most promising among them is Ru(II) complex 2a having 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline as N⁴ substitution.     

Syntheses, spectra and crystal structures of ruthenium(II) complexes with polypyridyl: [Ru(bipy)2(phen)](ClO4)2 · H2O and [Ru(bipy)2(Me-phen)](ClO4)2

Two ruthenium(II) complexes with polypyridyl, Ru(bipy)₂(phen)](ClO₄)₂·H₂O (1) and [Ru(bipy)₂(Me-phen)](ClO₄)₂ (2), (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline, bipy = 2,2′-bipyridine, Me-phen = 5-methyl-1,10-phenanthroline), were synthesized and characterized by IR, MS and NMR spectra. Their structures were determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction techniques. The strong steric interaction between the polypyridyl ligands was relieved neither by the elongation of the Ru---N bonds nor increase of the N---Ru---N bite angles. The coordination sphere was distorted to relieve the ligand interaction by forming specific angles (δ) between the polypyridyl ligand planes and coordination planes (N---Ru---N), and forming larger twisted angles between the two pyridine rings for each bipy. The bond distances of Ru---N(bipy) and Ru---N(phen) were virtually identical with experimental error, as expected of π back-bonding interactions which statistically involve each of the ligands present in the coordination sphere.     

Mixed-metal butterfly acetamidediato clusters derived from a highly reactive ruthenium oxo cluster: synthesis and characterization of [(PPh3)2N][MRu3(CO)12(η-μ3-NC(μ-O)CH3)], (M = Mn or Re)

Analogy with the isolable oxo cluster [Fe₃(CO)₉(μ₃-O)]²⁻, which is structurally interesting and synthetically useful, prompted the present attempt to synthesize its ruthenium analog. Although the high reactivity of [Ru₃(CO)₉(μ₃-O)]²⁻ (I) prevented its isolation, the reaction of this species with [M(CO)₃(NCCH₃)]⁺, where M = Mn or Re, yields [PPN][MRu₃(CO)₁₂(η²-μ₃-NC(μ-O)CH₃]⁻. The high nucleophilicity of the oxo ligand in [Ru₃(CO)₉(μ₃-O)]²⁻ (I) appears to be responsible for the conversion of acetonitrile to an acetamidediato ligand and for the instability of I. The crystal structure of [PPN][MnRu₃(CO)₁₂(η²-μ₃-NC(μ-O)CH₃)]] reveals a hinged butterfly array of metal atoms in which the acetamidediato ligand bridges the two wings with μ₃-N bonding to an Mn and two Ru atoms, and μ-O bonding to an Ru atom.     

Ruthenium complex catalyzed polymerization of OH or COOH group containing alkynes to give functionalized poly(acetylene)s

The ruthenium(III) complex [(Cp*)RuCl₂]₂ (Cp*=permethylcyclopentadienyl) catalyzes polymerization of propiolic acid to give a mixture of poly(propiolic acid), [---CH=C(COOH)---]_n (1), and cyclic trimers, 1,2,4- and 1,3,5- benzenetricarboxylic acids. GPC analysis shows MN and MW values of the polymer of 4.0 × 10³ and 4.3 × 10³, respectively. Reaction of propiolic acid in the presence of the Ru(II) complex, (Cp*)RuCI(L) (L=1,5-cyclooctadiene and norbornadiene), gives the cyclic trimers rather than 1. [(Cp*)RuCl₂]₂ catalyzes polymerization of acetylenedicarboxylic acid and of propargyl alcohol to give the corresponding poly(acetylene) derivatives, [---C(COOH)=C(COOH)---]_n (2) and [---CH=C(CH₂OH)---]_n (3), respectively. Polymerization of ethyl propiolate, 2-butyn-1,4-diol, phenylacetylene and (trimethylsilyl)acetylene using [(Cp*)RuCl₂]₂ gives the corresponding polymers [---CH=C(COOEt)---]_n (4), [---C(CH₂OH)=C(CH₂OH)---]_n (5), [---CH=CPh---]_n (6) and [---CH=C(SiMe₃)---]_n (7) in low yields.     

Mg-activated double-stranded DNA cleavage by [(bpy)2(OH2)Ru---O---Ru(H2O) (bpy)2]

The reaction of the title complex with DNA has been examined. Addition of [(bpy)₂(OH₂)RuORu(OH₂) (bpy)₂]⁴⁺ to DNA leads to the reduction of the complex to Ru(bpy)₂(OH₂)₂²⁺, as indicated by absorption spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry. The reaction is accelerated by Mg²⁺. The combined evidence points to a mechanism where the oxo-bridged dimer is hydrolyzed to a monomeric Ru(III) complex that is capable of oxidizing DNA to effect strand scission. Gel electrophoresis demonstrates nicking of supercoiled /gfX174 DNA by [(bpy)₂(OH₂)RuORu(OH₂) (bpy)₂]⁴⁺, and double-stranded cleavage is observed in the presence of Mg²⁺. Linearization of the plasmid prior to treatment with the complex does not lead to further fragmentation, suggesting that supercoiling is required to realize double-stranded cleavage.     

Second sphere coordination behavior of aquo and amine ligands bound to a η-benzeneruthenium(II) cation

The bis(oxazoline) ligand, 2,2-bis[4(R)-phenyl-1,3-oxazolon-2-yl]propane (bpop), was introduced to the η⁶-benzenemthenium(II) moiety on treatment with [Ru(η⁶-C₆H₆)Cl₂]₂ to give [Ru(η⁶-C₆H₆)(bpop)Cl]⁺. Aquo and amine complexes [Ru(η⁶-C₆H₆)(bpop)(L)]²⁺ (L = H₂O (1), NH₂R; R = H (2) , Me (3) , and n-Bu (4) ) were prepared by treating the chloride complex with AgBF₄ in the presence of L. X-ray structure determinations of 1 and 3 were carried out. Both complexes possessed a three-leg piano stool structure with the N or O donors located at the three comers of a pseudo octahedron. The aquo complex 1 exhibited a dynamic NMR feature in which two magnetically nonequivalent oxazoline parts observed at lower temperatures were interchanged with each other at higher temperatures. This observation was ascribed to the formation of a C₂-symmetric 16-electron intermediate via Ru-OH₂ cleavage, which is slower in acetone than in dichloromethane owing to more effective solvation by acetone around hydrogens of the coordinated water molecule. The two diastereotopic N-hydrogens of 4 underwent deuterium exchange with CD₃OD with greatly different rates from each other owing to different energy of NHO (D) (CD₃) interaction. Carboxylate and sulfonate ions (A⁻) formed second sphere complexes with 4 by means of NHA⁻ hydrogen bonding, as evidenced by continuous shift of NH₂ resonances with increasing amounts of the anions added.     

Alkene rotation in [Ru(η-C5H5) (L2) (η-alkene][CF3SO3] with L2 = iPr- or pTol-diazabutadiene. X-ray crystal structure of [Ru(η-C5H5(pTol-DAB) (η-ethene][CF3SO3]

Reaction of RuCl(η⁵-C₅H₅(pTol-DAB) with AgOTf (OTf = CF₃SO₃) in CH₂Cl₂ or THF and subsequent addition of L′ (L′ = ethene (a), dimethyl fumarate (b), fumaronitrile (c) or CO (d) led to the ionic complexes [Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(pTol-DAB)(L′)][OTf] 2a, 2b and 2d and [Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(pTol-DAB)(fumarontrile-N)][OTf] 5c. With the use of resonance Raman spectroscopy, the intense absorption bands of the complexes have been assigned to MLCT transitions to the iPr-DAB ligand. The X-ray structure determination of [Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(pTol-DAB)(η²-ethene)][CF₃SO₃] (2a) has been carried out. Crystal data for 2a: monoclinic, space group P2₁/n with A = 10.840(1), b = 16.639(1), C = 14.463(2) Å, β = 109.6(1)°, V = 2465.6(5) ų, Z = 4. Complex 2a has a piano stool structure, with the Cp ring η⁵-bonded, the pTol-DAB ligand σN, σN′ bonded (Ru-N distances 2.052(4) and 2.055(4) Å), and the ethene η²-bonded to the ruthenium center (Ru-C distances 2.217(9) and 2.206(8) Å). The C = C bond of the ethene is almost coplanar with the plane of the Cp ring, and the angle between the plane of the Cp ring and the double of the ethene is 1.8(0.2)°. The reaction of [RuCl(η⁵-C₅H₅)(PPh)₃ with AgOTf and ligands L′ = a and d led to [Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(PPh₃)₂(L′)]OTf] (3a) and (3d), respectively. By variable temperature NMR spectroscopy the rottional barrier of ethene (a), dimethyl fumarate (b and fumaronitrile (c) in complexes [Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(L₂)(η²-alkene][OTf] with L₂ = iPr-DAB (a, 1b, 1c), pTol-DAB (2a, 2b) and L = PPh₃ (3a) was determined. For 1a, 1b and 2b the barrier is 41.5±0.5, 62±1 and 59±1 kJ mol⁻¹, respectively. The intermediate exchange could not be reached for 1c, and the ΔG^# was estimated to be at least 61 kJ mol⁻. For 2a and 3a the slow exchange could not be reached. The rotational barrier for 2a was estimated to be 40 kJ mol⁻. The rotational barier for methyl propiolate (HC≡CC(O)OCH₃) (k) in complex [Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(iPr-DAB) η²-HC≡CC(O)OCH₃)][OTf] (1k) is 45.3±0.2 kJ mol⁻¹. The collected data show that the barrier of rotational of the alkene in complexes 1a, 2a, 1b, 2b and 1c does not correlate with the strength of the metal-alkene interaction in the ground state.     

Synthesis and characterization of polypyridineruthenium(II) complexes containing a linear ambidentate ligand, NCO or NCS, and reaction of isocyanato complexes under acidic conditions

Isocyanato and isothiocyanatopolypyridineruthenium complexes, [Ru(NCX)Y(bpy)(py)₂]ⁿ⁺ (bpy=2,2′-bipyridine, PY=pyridine; X=O, Y=NO₂ for n=0, and Y=py for n=1; X=S, Y=NO₂ for n=0, Y=NO for n=2, and Y=py for n=1), were synthesized by the reaction of polypyridineruthenium complexes with potassium cyanate or sodium thiocyanate salt. Isocyanatoruthenium(II) complexes, [Ru(NCO)(NO₂)(bpy)(py)₂] and [Ru(NCO)(bpy)(py)₃]⁺, react under acidic conditions to form the corresponding ammineruthenium complexes, [Ru(NO)(NH₃)(bpy)(py)₂]³⁺. The molecular structures of [Ru(NCO)(bpy)(py)₃]ClO₄, [Ru(NCS)(NO)(bpy)(py)₂](PF₆)₂ and [Ru(NO)(NH₃)(bpy)(py)₂](PF₆)₃ were determined by X-ray crystallography.     

Solution and crystal structure of the dihydrogen complex [Ru(H2)(H)(PMe2Ph)4]PF6, an active alkyne hydrogenation catalyst

The complex [Ru(H₂)(H)(PMe₂Ph)₄]PF₆ (1) has been prepared by reaction of [Ru(H)(PMe₂Ph)₅] FP₆ (2) in THF with 1 atm H₂ and characterised by variable temperature ³¹P and ¹H NMR. It undergoes four distinct fluxional processes listed in order of decreasing activation energy: (i) exchange of H₂ in solution with the dihydrogen ligand above 273 K; (ii) isomerisation of cis and trans isomers of 1 above 230 K; (iii) exchange of H atoms between H₂ and hydride in trans-1 above 180 K; (iv) rapid H₂/hydride exchange in cis-1 to below 180 K. A single crystal X-ray diffraction study of 1 at 173 K shows that the complex has the cis geometry in the solid state but does not clearly reveal the positions of the hydrogen ligands. Complex 1 starts out as a catalyst of high activity for the selective hydrogenation of 1-alkynes to 1-alkenes (RC≡CH; R=¹¹Bu, Ph) but it is rapidly deactivated, possibly because of formation of the enynyl complex [Ru(η³RC₃CHR)(PMe₂Ph)₄]⁺. Complex 1 efficiently catalyzes the hydrogenation of internal alkynes (3-hexyne, 2-pentyne) to internal cis-alkenes with little deactivation, although some isomerisation of the alkene produced is observed. These observations are consistent with those of Nkosi, Coville, Albers and Singleton who reported that complex 2 must dissociate one PMe₂Ph ligand to produce the species active for alkyne hydrogenation. Complex 2 catalyses these hydrogenations with slower initial rates than complex 1 but deactivates less readily. In contrast to 1, complex 2 does not appear to cause the isomerisation of internal alkenes.     

Substitution reaction mechanisms of dihydrido-ruthenium(II) phosphine complexes: hydribe basicity and molecular hydrogen intermediates

Kinetic and activation parameter data for the reactions of cct-Ru(H)₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ (1) (cct = cis, cis, trans) in THF with thiols, CO and PPh₃ to give cct-RuH(SR)(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂, Ru(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂ and Ru(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂, respectively, reveal a common, rate-determining step, the initial dissociation of H₂ from 1; the activated complex probably resembles the corresponding Ru(η²-H₂) species. Reaction of Ru(H)₂(dppm)₂ (2) (as a cis/trans mixture, DPPM = bis(diphenylphosphino)methane) with thiols initially generated cis- and trans- RuH(SR) (dppm)₂ with a rate that depends on both the type and concentration of thiol. The higher basicity of the hydride ligands in 2 (versus 1), which is demonstrated by deuterium exchange with CD₃OD, gives rise in the thiol reaction to an initial protonation step prior to loss of H₂. A species detected in the thiol reaction is possibly [RuH(η²-H₂ (dppm)₂]², the anticipated intermediate for this reaction and for the hydrogen exchange with alcohol. A longer reaction of 2 with PhCH₂SH gives solely cis-Ru(SCH₂Ph)₂(dppm)₂.     

Reactivity of cationic carbonyl/phosphine ruthenium(II) compounds

Cis(or trans)-[RuCl₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂] react with two and one equivalents of AgBF₄ to give the recently reported [Ru(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂][BF₄]₂·CH₂Cl₂ (1) and novel [RuCl(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂][BF₄] · 1/2 CH₂Cl₂ (2), respectively. Cis-[RuCl₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂] also reacts with two equivalents of AgBF₄ in the presence of CO to give [Ru(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂][BF₄]₂ (3). Reactions of 1 and 2 with NaOMe and CO at 1 atm produce the carbomethoxy species [Ru(COOMe)₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂] (4) and [RuCl(COOMe)(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂] (5), respectively. Complex 4 can also be formed from the reaction of 3 with NaOMe and CO. Alternatively, 4 is formed from cis-[RuCl₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂] with NaOMe and CO at elevated pressure (10 atm); if these reactants are refluxed under 1 atm of CO, [Ru(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂] is the product. The reaction of [RuCl(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂][AlCl₄] with NaOMe provides an alternative route to the preparation of 5, but the product is contaminated with [RuCl₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂]. Compounds 1. 2, 4 and 5 have been characterised by IR, ¹H NMR and analysis, whilst the formulation of 3 is proposed from spectroscopic data only. This account also examines the reactivity of [Ru(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂][BF₄]₂ · CH₂Cl₂ with NaBH₄, conc. HCl, KI and, finally, MeCOONa in the presence of CO. The products of these reactions, namely cis-[RuH₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂], cis-[RuCl₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂], cis-[RuI₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂] and [Ru(OOCMe)₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂], have been identified by comparison of their spectra with previous literature.     

Selective recognition of metal complexes by macrocyclic ethers: further observations on the macrocycle size dependence and the first-sphere ligand composition dependence of recognition thermodynamics

Additional studies of solution phase recognition of Ru(NH₃)_x(pyridine)_y²⁺, Ru(NH₃)_x(2,2′-bipyridine)_y²⁺ and Ru(NH₃)₄(1,10-phenantroline)²⁺ species by dibenzo crown ethers are reported. The factors most closely examined were crown size, ammine ligand content and ancillary ligand composition. The overall study confirms that recognition or association derives primarily from H-bond formation (ammine hydrogen/ether oxygen. Evidently opposing these interactions, however, are crown conformational rearrangements. Consequently, straight-forward correlatins between association strength and potential number of H-bond interactions are found only in selected cases. Based on comparisons of association constants for (bis) pyridine, bipyridine and phenanthroline ligand-containing species with dibenzo crowns, evidence is also found for favorable polypyridine/benzene interactions. NMR (NOE) measurements indicate that the preferred association geometrics in solution are those that make each of the benzenes of the crown coplanar (or nearly coplanar) with the ligated polypyridine.     

Photoluminescence and electrogenerated chemiluminescence of a bis(bipyridyl)ruthenium(II)-porphyrin complex

The photoluminescence (PL) and electrogenerated chemiluminescence (ECL) of [H₂(MPy3,4DMPP)Ru(bpy)₂Cl](PF₆), where H₂MPy3,4DMPP = meso-tris-3,4-dimethoxyphenyl-mono-(4-pyridyl)porphyrin and bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine, are reported in acetonitrile. The compound has a complex absorbance spectrum with bands characteristic of both the porphyrin and ruthenium moieties. PL emission maxim are observed at 655 nm when excited at the maximum absorption intensity corresponding to the porphyrin Soret π → π^∗ band, and around 600 nm when excited at wavelengths corresponding to Ru(dπ)-bpy (π^∗) MLCT transition. The photoluminescence efficiency (?_em) of the 655 nm emission is 0.039 and that of the free porphyrin is 0.69 compared to at 0.042.[H₂(MPy3,4DMPP)Ru(bpy)₂Cl](PF₆) displays complex electrochemical behavior, with one electrochemically reversible Ru^II-Ru^III oxidation and two quasi-reversible waves at more cathodic potentials corresponding to the porphyrin moiety. Oxidative ECL was generated using the coreactant tri-n-propylamine (TPrA). ECL efficiencies (?_ecl) were 0.14 for [H₂(MPy3,4DMPP)Ru(bpy)₂Cl]⁺ and 0.099 for H₂MPy3,4DMPP using as the standard (?_ecl = 1). ECL intensity was linear with respect to concentration from 1 to 0.001 μM.The ECL intensity peaks at potentials corresponding to oxidation both the ruthenium and porphyrin moieties as well as TPrA, indicating that multiple pathways for formation of the excited state are possible. However, an ECL spectrum shows a band similar in energy and shape to that of the Soret emission (655 nm for the PL and 656 nm for the ECL, respectively), indicating the same excited state is formed in each experiment.     

Substitution kinetics of tetracarbonyl(η-alkene)ruthenium complexes: ALKENE = ethene and methyl acrylate

The kinetics in heptane of displacement of the alkene ligands ethene and methyl acrylate from Ru(CO)₄(η²-alkene) by P(OEt)₃ have been measured. The reactions occur by reversible dissociation of the alkenes, and activation parameters are compared with those for dissociation of CO from Ru(CO)₅ and for reactions of the corresponding Os complexes. A linear free energy relationship for ligand dissociation from Ru(CO)₅, Ru(CO)₄(C₂H₄) and Ru(CO)₄(MA) has a gradient close to unity, indicating virtually complete bond breaking in the transition states. Competition parameters for reactions of what is probably a solvated Ru(CO)₄S intermediate have been measured for the alkenes and P(OEt)₃, and for eleven other P-donor nucleophiles. Correlations with the electronic and steric properties of the P-donors show negligible dependence on the electron donicity of the nucleophiles and a small but significant dependence on their sizes. The sizes were quantified by Tolman cone angles or by ‘cone angle equivalents’ derived directly from Brown's ligand repulsion energies (E_r). These correlations compared with those, reported elsewhere, for reactions of the probably solvated intermediates Co₂(CO)₅(μ²-C₂Ph₂) and H₃Re₃(CO)₁₁ formed by ligand dissociative processes. In all cases the discrimination between nucleophiles by the intermediates is weak confirming their high reactivity and the borderline nature of the mechanisms of these bimolecular reactions between I_d and I_a.