A new biology for a new century.

Biology today is at a crossroads. The molecular paradigm, which so successfully guided the discipline throughout most of the 20th century, is no longer a reliable guide. Its vision of biology now realized, the molecular paradigm has run its course. Biology, therefore, has a choice to make, between the comfortable path of continuing to follow molecular biology's lead or the more invigorating one of seeking a new and inspiring vision of the living world, one that addresses the major problems in biology that 20th century biology, molecular biology, could not handle and, so, avoided. The former course, though highly productive, is certain to turn biology into an engineering discipline. The latter holds the promise of making biology an even more fundamental science, one that, along with physics, probes and defines the nature of reality. This is a choice between a biology that solely does society's bidding and a biology that is society's teacher.     

A New Biology for a New Century

Biology today is at a crossroads. The molecular paradigm, which so successfully guided the discipline throughout most of the 20th century, is no longer a reliable guide. Its vision of biology now realized, the molecular paradigm has run its course. Biology, therefore, has a choice to make, between the comfortable path of continuing to follow molecular biology's lead or the more invigorating one of seeking a new and inspiring vision of the living world, one that addresses the major problems in biology that 20th century biology, molecular biology, could not handle and, so, avoided. The former course, though highly productive, is certain to turn biology into an engineering discipline. The latter holds the promise of making biology an even more fundamental science, one that, along with physics, probes and defines the nature of reality. This is a choice between a biology that solely does society's bidding and a biology that is society's teacher.     

Advertising and the Predation Loop: A Biosemiotic Model

The basic premise of biosemiotics as a discipline is that there are elementary processes linking signifying strategies in all forms of animate life. Correspondingly, the discoveries of biosemiotics should, in principle, be capable of revealing new insights about human signification. In the present article, I show that this is in fact the case by constructing a biosemiotic model that links advertising strategies with corresponding structures in animal predation. The methodological framework for this model is the catastrophe theory of René Thom. The end result is a revised understanding of an ostensibly cultural phenomenon that demonstrates its continuity with signalling processes conventionally associated with the natural world.

Biosemiotic Questions

This paper examines the biosemiotic approach to the study of life processes by fashioning a series of questions that any worthwhile semiotic study of life should ask. These questions can be understood simultaneously as: (1) questions that distinguish a semiotic biology from a non-semiotic (i.e., reductionist–physicalist) one; (2) questions that any student in biosemiotics should ask when doing a case study; and (3) still currently unanswered questions of biosemiotics. In addition, some examples of previously undertaken biosemiotic case studies are examined so as to suggest a broad picture of how such a biosemiotic approach to biology might be done.

A Short History of Biosemiotics

Biosemiotics is the synthesis of biology and semiotics, and its main purpose is to show that semiosis is a fundamental component of life, i.e., that signs and meaning exist in all living systems. This idea started circulating in the 1960s and was proposed independently from enquires taking place at both ends of the Scala Naturae. At the molecular end it was expressed by Howard Pattee’s analysis of the genetic code, whereas at the human end it took the form of Thomas Sebeok’s investigation into the biological roots of culture. Other proposals appeared in the years that followed and gave origin to different theoretical frameworks, or different schools, of biosemiotics. They are: (1) the physical biosemiotics of Howard Pattee and its extension in Darwinian biosemiotics by Howard Pattee and by Terrence Deacon, (2) the zoosemiotics proposed by Thomas Sebeok and its extension in sign biosemiotics developed by Thomas Sebeok and by Jesper Hoffmeyer, (3) the code biosemiotics of Marcello Barbieri and (4) the hermeneutic biosemiotics of Anton Marko?. The differences that exist between the schools are a consequence of their different models of semiosis, but that is only the tip of the iceberg. In reality they go much deeper and concern the very nature of the new discipline. Is biosemiotics only a new way of looking at the known facts of biology or does it predict new facts? Does biosemiotics consist of testable hypotheses? Does it add anything to the history of life and to our understanding of evolution? These are the major issues of the young discipline, and the purpose of the present paper is to illustrate them by describing the origin and the historical development of its main schools.     

The Cultural Implications of Biosemiotics

This article focuses on the cultural implications of biosemiotics, considering the extent to which biosemiotics constitutes an “epistemological break” with modern modes of conceptualizing the world. To some extent, the article offers a series of footnotes to points made in the work of Jesper Hoffmeyer. However, it is argued that the move towards ‘agency’ represented in biosemiotics needs to be approached with caution in light of problems of translation between the humanities and the sciences. Notwithstanding these problems, biosemiotics is found to represent the potential for one of the most thoroughgoing shifts that cultural analysis has yet seen.     

Reflexions sur l'usage,en biologie,de la theorie de l'information

For living beings, information is as fundamental as matter or energy. In this paper we show: a) inadequacies of quantitative theories of information, b) how a qualitative analysis leads to a classification of information systems and to a modelling of intercellular communication. From a quantitative point of view, the application in biology of information theories borrowed from communication techniques proved to be disappointing. These theories ignore deliberately the significance of messages, and do not give any definition of information. They refer to quantities, based upon arbitrarily defined probabilistic events. Probability is subjective. The receiver of the message needs to have ‘meta-knowledge’ of the events. The quantity of information depends on language, coding, and arbitrary definition of disorder. The suggested objectivity is fallacious. In common language, the word ‘information’ is synonymous with knowledge of order. Following common sense a message (letters, coded signals, etc.) is information just in case it is interpretable, i.e.if it fits to a previously acquired meaning (the words of an available language, etc.). The consequence is that calculation of quantities in the sense of Shannon can be used for transmissions, but it is itself meaningless (has no significance). In linguistics and semantics, information is composed of a ‘signifier’, a physical medium (letters, coded signals, etc.), and a ‘signified’ or significance. The nature of information is complex. The laws of linguistics and semantics are valid not only at the human, organismic level, but also at the cellular and molecular level. The physiology of sensations gives us many examples for application of a concept of information An electromagnetic wave of 0,7% give us the sensation of a red colour. Sensations have no physical reality. They are purely subjective. At the cellular level communication operates by means of chemical messengers (first messengers), which generally do not penetrate the plasmic membrane. Specific captors operate as transductors: external factors are converted into secondary messengers (cyclic AMP, Ca ion, etc.). Sometimes, electric signals (like depolarization waves) may also play a part in the intercellular communication. Such processes are characterized by changes in a sequence of different molecules carried by a physical signal. What is transmitted is themeaning of the message (significance) which can be memorized by the cell, providing a possible following use. At the molecular level one can find also the processes of linguistic nature. We know that the significance of a word is changed with changing the order of letters (ADD→DAD, etc.). In the same way bases C and U are coding for serine (UCC), leucine (CUC) or proline (CCU). Here, amino-acids express the significance. In spite of the fact that this key-lock mechanism may explain many reactions, the examples prove that other elements are necessary for understanding the information. The living cell is the receiver. The message actualizes only previously learned and memorized significances or actions (trigger effect). Significance is not an emergent property of the shape of the message. It depends on the receiver and the transmitter. A word can have more than one meaning. Similarly, a messenger can order different physiological responses: muscular tension, hormonal secretion, etc.. Thus a chemical messenger is a signal which is identified and interpreted by the receiver, depending upon specific languages and previous learning. These views are in harmony with immunological and Jerne's theory (of idiotypical net). The above mentioned considerations led the author to propose thetheory of data transfer, which takes into account significance. In this theory the quantity of information is the product of the probabilistic recognition of message and the value of significance as determined by its semantic level. (See: Acta biotheoretica vol. 41 No 1/2 June 1993.) The complex nature of information asks to propose a qualitative classification with respect to thematerial support and thesignificance.

1. The material support may be linear in time (sequential reading, ADN translation)-The material support may be referred to non-temporally (drawings, logos, holograms) (Reading is instantaneous)-The material support may be in circulation, or in stock.
2. The significance may be local (tissues, organs) or general (organisms). Asignificance may be a command to be executed (imperative, conditional order) or knowledge to bememorized. The purpose of significance may be a coding for space (for morphology) or for time (ontogeny, ageing).

Conclusion: Information cannot any longer be regarded as an object. Its nature is complex, at all levels of a living being. At the molecular level to memorize an information by modification of a molecule is comparable with writing words on a diary. The key-lock process does not suppress the question of the interpretation, i.e. relations existing between the shape of a microscopic element as a molecule, and its macroscopic effect, as an antenna or a leg. There are still many unclear points in these relations, e.g. the sweet taste of molecules of tomatine and monelline. The abstract nature of significance which at the human level is concerned to mental processes, is not only a philosophical problem. In fact, there is a hypothesis based on quantum mechanics which allows to consider a physical nature of significance. In any case, the important conclusion is that significance in bio-information must be considered in relation to the message-receiver. The receiver must no longer be considered a passive one. The qualitative classification of information will allow an understanding of circulation of information in organisms and between cells.     

系统生物学与细胞发生系统动力学

系统生物学是系统理论和实验生物技术、计算机数学模型等方法整合的生物系统研究,系统遗传学研究基因组的稳态与进化、功能基因组和生物性状等复杂系统的结构、动态与发生演变等。合成生物学是系统生物学的工程应用,采用工程学方法、基因工程和计算机辅助设计等研究人工生物系统的生物技术。系统与合成生物学的结构理论,序列标志片段显示分析与微流控生物芯片,广泛用于研究细胞代谢、繁殖和应激的自组织进化、生物体形态发生等细胞分子生物系统原理等。     

合成生物学技术在材料科学中的应用

材料是人类赖以生存与发展的物质基础,科技和社会的进步都离不开材料技术的发展,未来先进材料的合成和制备必然朝着绿色可持续、低耗高产出、精细可调控、高效多功能的方向发展。以"基因调控·工程设计"为核心的合成生物学技术从分子、细胞层面极大地推动了生命科学的发展,也已经并继续为材料科学的发展注入新的思路和活力。本文将围绕合成生物学技术在材料科学中的应用,以基因回路设计为核心,概念应用为线索,重点介绍合成生物学技术在高分子生物材料和无机纳米材料领域的开发和生产,细胞展示和蛋白定向进化战略对分子材料的筛选和优化,"活体"功能材料、工程菌调节的人工光合系统功能材料体系以及基因回路在材料科学中的应用。     

Signs and Instruments: The Convergence of Aristotelian and Kantian Intuitions in Biosemiotics

Biosemiotics—a discipline in the process of becoming established as a new research enterprise—faces a double task. On the one hand it must carry out the theoretical and experimental investigation of an enormous range of semiotic phenomena relating organisms to their internal components and to other organisms (e.g., signal transduction, replication, codes, etc.). On the other hand, it must achieve a philosophical re-conceptualization and generalization of theoretical biology in light of the essential role played by semiotic notions in biological explanation and modeling. This paper attempts to contribute to the second task by tracing some aspects of the historical evolution of explanatory models in biology. In so doing, a parallel can be drawn between the present status of biosemiotics and that of physics during the early decades of the last century. By following the career of the concept instrument (organon) in Aristotelian science, we revisit historical stages of the antithetical (but often complementary) roles of mechanical and teleological forms of explanation. The impact of the introduction of the organic codes in biology is seen to be somewhat analogous to that of the introduction of the quantum of action in physics. Faced with intractable empirical facts, physicists combined experimental results and bold philosophical speculation to create quantum physics—a wider, deeper framework that accommodates the new facts through a wholesale reformulation of the classical ideas. Essential to this development was the articulation of the epistemic functions of instruments, which was absent from classical physics. Similarly, the consideration of the role of instruments in biology may lead to a synthesis of Aristotelian and Kantian intuitions within a wider framework capable of joining now separate perspectives, such as Jablonka’s four-fold view of inheritance information, Barbieri’s theory of artifactual copymakers and codemakers, and recently developed models of causation based on the idea of manipulative interventions.

Basis for information transmission with biosignals for development of technical communication aids for handicapped patients]

For the design of communication aids controlled by biosignals for the handicapped, an analysis of the aspects of the significance of information is mandatory. The definition of information in its five aspects statistics, syntax, semantics, pragmatics and apobetics, enables us to conclude that the transmission of information is possible only with voluntarily influenceable biosignal components. The voluntary influencing of the biosignal may be interpreted as a modulation of the amplitude density of the Fourier integral. By calculating the highest possible statistical information content of a biosignal, it is possible to estimate the technical complexity of a biosignal-based communication system. The construction of efficient communication aids is possible when many biosignal components that can be readily and rapidly controlled voluntarily are to be found.     

Biosemiotics,the Extended Synthesis,and Ecological Information: Making Sense of the Organism-Environment Relation at the Cognitive Level

This paper argues that the Extended Synthesis, ecological information, and biosemiotics are complementary approaches whose engagement will help us explain the organism-environment interaction at the cognitive level. The Extended Synthesis, through niche construction theory, can explain the organism-environment interaction at an evolutionary level because niche construction is a process guided by information. We believe that the best account that defines information at this level is the one offered by biosemiotics and, within all kinds of biosemiotic information available, we believe that ecological information (information for affordances) is the best candidate for making sense of the organism-environment relation at the cognitive level. This entanglement of biosemiotics, ecological information and the Extended Synthesis is promising for understanding the multidimensional character of the organism-environment reciprocity as well as the relation between evolution, cognition, and meaning.     

Making developmental biology relevant to undergraduates in an era of economic rationalism in Australia

This report describes the road map we followed at our university to accommodate three main factors: financial pressure within the university system; desire to enhance the learning experience of undergraduates; and motivation to increase the prominence of the discipline of developmental biology in our university. We engineered a novel, multi-year undergraduate developmental biology program which was "student-oriented," ensuring that students were continually exposed to the underlying principles and philosophy of this discipline throughout their undergraduate career. Among its key features are introductory lectures in core courses in the first year, which emphasize the relevance of developmental biology to tissue engineering, reproductive medicine, therapeutic approaches in medicine, agriculture and aquaculture. State-of-the-art animated computer graphics and images of high visual impact are also used. In addition, students are streamed into the developmental biology track in the second year, using courses like human embryology and courses shared with cell biology, which include practicals based on modern experimental approaches. Finally, fully dedicated third-year courses in developmental biology are undertaken in conjunction with stand-alone practical courses where students experiencefirst-hand work in a research laboratory. Our philosophy is a "cradle-to-grave" approach to the education of undergraduates so as to prepare highly motivated, enthusiastic and well-educated developmental biologists for entry into graduate programs and ultimately post-doctoral research.     

Information in morphological characters

The construction of morphological character matrices is central to paleontological systematic study, which extracts paleontological information from fossils. Although the word information has been repeatedly mentioned in a wide array of paleontological systematic studies, its meaning has rarely been clarified nor specifically defined. It is important, however, to establish a standard to measure paleontological information because fossils are hardly complete, rendering the recognition of homologous and homoplastic structures difficult. Here, based on information theory, we show the deep connections between paleontological systematic study and communication system engineering. Information is defined as the decrease of uncertainty and it is the information in morphological characters that allows distinguishing operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and reconstructing evolutionary history. We propose that concepts in communication system engineering such as source coding and channel coding, correspond to the construction of diagnostic features and the entire character matrices in paleontological studies. The two coding strategies should be distinguished following typical communication system engineering, because they serve dual purposes. With character matrices from six different vertebrate groups, we analyzed their information properties including source entropy, mutual information, and channel capacity. Estimation of channel capacity shows character saturation of all matrices in transmitting paleontological information, indicating that, due to the presence of noise, oversampling characters not only increases the burden in character scoring, but also may decrease quality of matrices. We further test the use of information entropy, which measures how informative a variable is, as a character weighting criterion in parsimony‐based systematic studies. The results show high consistency with existing knowledge with both good resolution and interpretability.     

The Semantic Morphology of Adolf Portmann: A Starting Point for the Biosemiotics of Organic Form?

This paper develops the ideas of the Swiss zoologist Adolf Portmann or, more precisely, his concept of organic self-representation, wherein Portmann considered the outer surface of living organisms as a specific organ that serves in a self-representational role. This idea is taken as a starting point from which to elaborate Portman’s ideas, so as to make them compatible with the theoretical framework of biosemiotics. Today, despite the many theories that help us understand aposematism, camouflage, deception and other phenomena related to the category of mimicry, there still is a need for a general theory of self-representation that would re-synthesize evolutionary, morphogenetic and semiotic aspects of the surface of organisms. Here, Adolf Portmann’s concept of self-representation is considered as an important step towards the biosemiotics of animal form.

Applying modelling experiences from the past to shape crop systems biology: the need to converge crop physiology and functional genomics

Functional genomics has been driven greatly by emerging experimental technologies. Its development as a scientific discipline will be enhanced by systems biology, which generates novel, quantitative hypotheses via modelling. However, in order to better assist crop improvement, the impact of developing functional genomics needs to be assessed at the crop level, given a projected diminishing effect of genetic alteration on phenotypes from the molecule to crop levels. This review illustrates a recently proposed research field, crop systems biology, which is located at the crossroads of crop physiology and functional genomics, and intends to promote communications between the two. Past experiences with modelling whole-crop physiology indicate that the layered structure of biological systems should be taken into account. Moreover, modelling not only plays a role in data synthesis and quantitative prediction, but certainly also in heuristics and system design. These roles of modelling can be applied to crop systems biology to enhance its contribution to our understanding of complex crop phenotypes and subsequently to crop improvement. The success of crop systems biology needs commitments from scientists along the entire knowledge chain of plant biology, from molecule or gene to crop and agro-ecosystem.     

Where Does Pattee’s “How Does a Molecule Become a Message?” Belong in the History of Biosemiotics?

Recalling the title of Yoxen’s classical paper on the influence of Schrödinger’s book, I analyze the role that the work of H. Pattee might have played, if any, in the development of Biosemiotics. I take his 1969 paper “How does a molecule become a message?” (Developmental Biology Supplement) as a first target due to several circumstances that make it especially salient. On the one hand, even if Pattee has obviously developed further his ideas on later papers, the significance of this one springs out right from the title, the journal and date of publication and, of course, its content. On the other, this paper in particular has been somehow rediscovered recently and not only within the frame of biosemiotics (eg, in history and philosophy of biology by E.F. Keller). Following the parallelism with Yoxen’s perspective, I contend that Pattee’s work was relatively influential with respect to a good amount of attempts to rethink living systems within theoretical biology around the 70s. This influence diminished together with the decay or even collapse of those attempts under the impact of molecular biology as it was being developed those years. Eventually, Pattee’s work has been taken up again. Notwithstanding, it is quite clear that Pattee himself was not intending to contribute specifically to Biosemiotics and that he was probably unaware of any such discipline, at least until recently. Then, we should as well ask (as Yoxen wonders with respect to Schrödinger) to which extent Pattee’s influence has been a direct one or rather an indication of the relevance of his ideas and the resonance of his hypotheses with those of biosemiotics. For this task I will sketch a few points of convergence and divergence and examine the work of some authors who either address directly this issue or have contributed significantly to build up the history of Biosemiotics.