MPer1 and mper2 are essential for normal resetting of the circadian clock

Mammalian Per1 and Per2 genes are involved in the mechanism of the circadian clock and are inducible by light. A light pulse can evoke a change in the onset of wheel-running activity in mice by shifting the onset of activity to earlier times (phase advance) or later times (phase delays) thereby advancing or delaying the clock (clock resetting). To assess the role of mouse Per (mPer) genes in circadian clock resetting, mice carrying mutant mPer1 or mPer2 genes were tested for responses to a light pulse at ZT 14 and ZT 22, respectively. The authors found that mPer1 mutants did not advance and mPer2 mutants did not delay the clock. They conclude that the mammalian Per genes are not only light-responsive components of the circadian oscillator but also are involved in resetting of the circadian clock.     

Conditioning in the Orcadian System

Light is the dominant environmental cue for entrainment of circadian rhythms. In mammals, light entrains rhythms by resetting the phase of a circadian pacemaker located in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Until recently, the mechanism responsible for pacemaker resetting by light was thought to be exclusively sensitive to photic cues. New experiments indicate, however, that this mechanism is more plastic than once thought; is amenable to conditioned stimulus control; and is capable of acquiring, through conditioning, new response capabilities. These experiments showed that, in rats, a neutral stimulus paired with light in Pavlovian conditioning trials is capable of eliciting cellular and behavioral effects characteristic of circadian clock phase resetting by light, expression of Fos protein in the ventrolateral region of the SCN, and phase shifts of free-running rhythms. These novel results open up a previously unappreciated perspective on photic phase resetting and entrainment of circadian rhythms. Specifically, they suggest that the process normally initiated by light to reset the clock can be modified by learning and events in the environment that reliably precede the onset of light can assume the resetting function of light.     

An autonomous circadian clock in the inner mouse retina regulated by dopamine and GABA

The influence of the mammalian retinal circadian clock on retinal physiology and function is widely recognized, yet the cellular elements and neural regulation of retinal circadian pacemaking remain unclear due to the challenge of long-term culture of adult mammalian retina and the lack of an ideal experimental measure of the retinal circadian clock. In the current study, we developed a protocol for long-term culture of intact mouse retinas, which allows retinal circadian rhythms to be monitored in real time as luminescence rhythms from a PERIOD2::LUCIFERASE (PER2::LUC) clock gene reporter. With this in vitro assay, we studied the characteristics and location within the retina of circadian PER2::LUC rhythms, the influence of major retinal neurotransmitters, and the resetting of the retinal circadian clock by light. Retinal PER2::LUC rhythms were routinely measured from whole-mount retinal explants for 10 d and for up to 30 d. Imaging of vertical retinal slices demonstrated that the rhythmic luminescence signals were concentrated in the inner nuclear layer. Interruption of cell communication via the major neurotransmitter systems of photoreceptors and ganglion cells (melatonin and glutamate) and the inner nuclear layer (dopamine, acetylcholine, GABA, glycine, and glutamate) did not disrupt generation of retinal circadian PER2::LUC rhythms, nor did interruption of intercellular communication through sodium-dependent action potentials or connexin 36 (cx36)-containing gap junctions, indicating that PER2::LUC rhythms generation in the inner nuclear layer is likely cell autonomous. However, dopamine, acting through D1 receptors, and GABA, acting through membrane hyperpolarization and casein kinase, set the phase and amplitude of retinal PER2::LUC rhythms, respectively. Light pulses reset the phase of the in vitro retinal oscillator and dopamine D1 receptor antagonists attenuated these phase shifts. Thus, dopamine and GABA act at the molecular level of PER proteins to play key roles in the organization of the retinal circadian clock.     

A novel mutation in kaiC affects resetting of the cyanobacterial circadian clock

Light is the most important factor controlling circadian systems in response to day-night cycles. In order to better understand the regulation of circadian rhythms by light in Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942, we screened for mutants with defective phase shifting in response to dark pulses. Using a 5-h dark-pulse protocol, we identified a mutation in kaiC that we termed pr1, for phase response 1. In the pr1 mutant, a 5-h dark pulse failed to shift the phase of the circadian rhythm, while the same pulse caused a 10-h phase shift in wild-type cells. The rhythm in accumulation of KaiC was abolished in the pr1 mutant, and the rhythmicity of KaiC phosphorylation was reduced. Additionally, the pr1 mutant was defective in mediating the feedback inhibition of kaiBC. Finally, overexpression of mutant KaiC led to a reduced phase shift compared to that for wild-type KaiC. Thus, KaiC appears to play a role in resetting the cellular clock in addition to its documented role in the feedback regulation of circadian rhythms.     

JNK regulates the photic response of the mammalian circadian clock

The posttranslational regulation of mammalian clock proteins has been assigned a time-keeping function, but seems to have more essential roles. Here we show that c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), identified by inhibitor screening of BMAL1 phosphorylation at Ser 520/Thr 527/Ser 592, confers dynamic regulation on the clock. Knockdown of JNK1 and JNK2 abrogates BMAL1 phosphorylation and lengthens circadian period in fibroblasts. Mice deficient for neuron-specific isoform JNK3 have altered behavioural rhythms, with longer free-running period and compromised phase shifts to light. The locomotor rhythms are insensitive to intensity variance of constant light, deviating from Aschoff's rule. Thus, JNK regulates a core characteristic of the circadian clock by controlling the oscillation speed and the phase in response to light.     

Development and validation of computational models for mammalian circadian oscillators

Circadian rhythms are endogenous rhythms with a cycle length of approximately 24 h. Rhythmic production of specific proteins within pacemaker structures is the basis for these physiological and behavioral rhythms. Prior work on mathematical modeling of molecular circadian oscillators has focused on the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. Recently, great advances have been made in our understanding of the molecular basis of circadian rhythms in mammals. Mathematical models of the mammalian circadian oscillator are needed to piece together diverse data, predict experimental results, and help us understand the clock as a whole. Our objectives are to develop mathematical models of the mammalian circadian oscillator, generate and test predictions from these models, gather information on the parameters needed for model development, integrate the molecular model with an existing model of the influence of light and rhythmicity on human performance, and make models available in BioSpice so that they can be easily used by the general community. Two new mammalian models have been developed, and experimental data are summarized. These studies have the potential to lead to new strategies for resetting the circadian clock. Manipulations of the circadian clock can be used to optimize performance by promoting alertness and physiological synchronization.     

Mammalian cultured cells as a model system of peripheral circadian clocks

The mammalian circadian system consists of multiple oscillators with basically hierarchical relationship, in which the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is the master pacemaker and the other oscillators in the periphery are subordinate. Although peripheral oscillators have been preceded by the SCN in circadian studies, accumulating data have revealed the importance and characteristics of peripheral oscillators. Cultured cell lines have also provided valuable information about intracellular mechanisms of circadian rhythms. This review outlines the properties of peripheral clocks in several perspectives such as the mechanisms of autonomous oscillations, the clock resetting, and the clock outputs, and describes the usefulness of immortalized cultured cells as a model system of mammalian circadian clocks by introducing some fruits of related works.     

Social influences on mammalian circadian rhythms: animal and human studies

While light is considered the dominant stimulus for entraining (synchronizing) mammalian circadian rhythms to local environmental time, social stimuli are also widely cited as 'zeitgebers' (time-cues). This review critically assesses the evidence for social influences on mammalian circadian rhythms, and possible mechanisms of action. Social stimuli may affect circadian behavioural programmes by regulating the phase and period of circadian clocks (i.e. a zeitgeber action, either direct or by conditioning to photic zeitgebers), by influencing daily patterns of light exposure or modulating light input to the clock, or by associative learning processes that utilize circadian time as a discriminative or conditioned stimulus. There is good evidence that social stimuli can act as zeitgebers. In several species maternal signals are the primary zeitgeber in utero and prior to weaning. Adults of some species can also be phase shifted or entrained by single or periodic social interactions, but these effects are often weak, and appear to be mediated by social stimulation of arousal. There is no strong evidence yet for sensory-specific nonphotic inputs to the clock. The circadian phase-dependence of clock resetting to social stimuli or arousal (the 'nonphotic' phase response curve, PRC), where known, is distinct from that to light and similar in diurnal and nocturnal animals. There is some evidence that induction of arousal can modulate light input to the clock, but no studies yet of whether social stimuli can shift the clock by conditioning to photic cues, or be incorporated into the circadian programme by associative learning. In humans, social zeitgebers appear weak by comparison with light. In temporal isolation or under weak light-dark cycles, humans may ignore social cues and free-run independently, although cases of mutual synchrony among two or more group-housed individuals have been reported. Social cues may affect circadian timing by controlling sleep-wake states, but the phase of entrainment observed to fixed sleep-wake schedules in dim light is consistent with photic mediation (scheduled variations in behavioural state necessarily create daily light-dark cycles unless subjects are housed in constant dark or have no eyes). By contrast, discrete exercise sessions can induce phase shifts consistent with the nonphotic PRC observed in animal studies. The best evidence for social entrainment in humans is from a few totally blind subjects who synchronize to the 24 h day, or to near-24 h sleep-wake schedules under laboratory conditions. However, the critical entraining stimuli have not yet been identified, and there are no reported cases yet of social entrainment in bilaterally enucleated blind subjects. The role of social zeitgebers in mammalian behavioural ecology, their mechanisms of action, and their utility for manipulating circadian rhythms in humans, remains to be more fully elaborated.