Intranasal concentrations of orally administered flavors

The odorants emanating from the oral cavity during eating and drinking reach the olfactory mucosa via the pharynx (retronasal olfaction). It is unclear which variables influence the perception of intraorally applied substances. The aim of the present study was to determine the temporal profiles of volatile odor concentrations at different locations in the nasal cavity during consumption of liquid and solid custard samples using proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry. Intranasal odor concentrations were measured at least twice in nine subjects (six female, three male) at four nasal positions during the consumption of liquid and solid custards. The low-viscosity custard was swallowed earlier than the more solid one. The compounds were found to reach the nose in different concentrations. Largest maximal amplitudes were measured in the nasopharynx, whereas lowest concentrations were found in the region of the olfactory cleft. In addition, different odorants reached the different regions in the nasal cavity in varying concentrations, indicated by a significant interaction between factors "position" and "compound". Furthermore, the compounds were found to reach the positions within the nasal cavity with different latencies. These results indicate that different volatile flavor compounds exhibit different temporal and spatial profiles in terms of their intranasal distribution.     

Sniffing and spatiotemporal coding in olfaction

The act of sniffing increases the air velocity and changes the duration of airflow in the nose. It is not yet clear how these changes interact with the intrinsic timing within the olfactory bulb, but this is a matter of current research activity. An action of sniffing in generating a high velocity that alters the sorption of odorants onto the lining of the nasal cavity is expected from the established work on odorant properties and sorption in the frog nose. Recent work indicates that the receptor properties in the olfactory epithelium and olfactory bulb are correlated with the receptor gene expression zones. The responses in both the epithelium and the olfactory bulb are predictable to a considerable extent by the hydrophobicity of odorants. Furthermore, receptor expression in both rodent and salamander nose interacts with the shapes of the nasal cavity to place the receptor sensitivity to odorants in optimal places according to the aerodynamic properties of the nose.     

A computational study of odorant transport and deposition in the canine nasal cavity: implications for olfaction

Olfaction begins when an animal draws odorant-laden air into its nasal cavity by sniffing, thus transporting odorant molecules from the external environment to olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) in the sensory region of the nose. In the dog and other macrosmatic mammals, ORNs are relegated to a recess in the rear of the nasal cavity that is comprised of a labyrinth of scroll-like airways. Evidence from recent studies suggests that nasal airflow patterns enhance olfactory sensitivity by efficiently delivering odorant molecules to the olfactory recess. Here, we simulate odorant transport and deposition during steady inspiration in an anatomically correct reconstructed model of the canine nasal cavity. Our simulations show that highly soluble odorants are deposited in the front of the olfactory recess along the dorsal meatus and nasal septum, whereas moderately soluble and insoluble odorants are more uniformly deposited throughout the entire olfactory recess. These results demonstrate that odorant deposition patterns correspond with the anatomical organization of ORNs in the olfactory recess. Specifically, ORNs that are sensitive to a particular class of odorants are located in regions where that class of odorants is deposited. The correlation of odorant deposition patterns with the anatomical organization of ORNs may partially explain macrosmia in the dog and other keen-scented species.     

Numerical modeling of turbulent and laminar airflow and odorant transport during sniffing in the human and rat nose

Human sniffing behavior usually involves bouts of short, high flow rate inhalation (>300 ml/s through each nostril) with mostly turbulent airflow. This has often been characterized as a factor enabling higher amounts of odorant to deposit onto olfactory mucosa than for laminar airflow and thereby aid in olfactory detection. Using computational fluid dynamics human nasal cavity models, however, we found essentially no difference in predicted olfactory odorant flux (g/cm2 s) for turbulent versus laminar flow for total nasal flow rates between 300 and 1000 ml/s and for odorants of quite different mucosal solubility. This lack of difference was shown to be due to the much higher resistance to lateral odorant mass transport in the mucosal nasal airway wall than in the air phase. The simulation also revealed that the increase in airflow rate during sniffing can increase odorant uptake flux to the nasal/olfactory mucosa but lower the cumulative total uptake in the olfactory region when the inspired air/odorant volume was held fixed, which is consistent with the observation that sniff duration may be more important than sniff strength for optimizing olfactory detection. In contrast, in rats, sniffing involves high-frequency bouts of both inhalation and exhalation with laminar airflow. In rat nose odorant uptake simulations, it was observed that odorant deposition was highly dependent on solubility and correlated with the locations of different types of receptors.     

'Sniffin' Sticks': Olfactory Performance Assessed by the Combined Testing of Odour Identification, Odor Discrimination and Olfactory Threshold

‘Sniffin’ Sticks' is a new test of nasal chemosensoryperformance based on pen-like odor dispensing devices. It comprisesthree tests of olfactory function, namely tests for odor threshold(n-butanol, testing by means of a single staircase), odor discrimination(15 pairs of odorants, triple forced choice) and odor identification(16 common odorants, multiple forced choice from four verbalitems per test odorant). After extensive preliminary investigationsthe tests were applied to a group of 104 healthy volunteers(52 female, 52 male, mean age 49.5 years, range 18–84years) in order to establish test-retest reliability and tocompare them with an established measure of olfactory performance(the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center Test,CCCRC). Performance decreased with increasing age of the subjects(     

Recent Results in the Search for New Molecules with Ambergris Odor

The synthesis of new odorant molecules is still a challenging task for the fragrance chemist, because now as ever it is difficult to predict the odor properties of small organic molecules. Therefore, certain tools, such as, e.g., lead‐structure optimization of existing odorants, are helpful techniques. In this article, we describe the synthesis and the odor properties of a new molecule derived by the so‐called ‘seco’ lead‐structure optimization of the ambergris compound Ambroxide^®. Based on these results, more representatives with similar structures have been synthesized and evaluated for their olfactory properties.     

Concentration and Membrane Fluidity Dependence of Odor Discrimination in the Turtle Olfactory System

In the present study, we examined the concentration dependenceof odor discrimination in turtle olfactory bulbar responsesusing the cross-adaptation technique. In the odorant pairs withdiverse molecular structures, the degree of discrimination wasunchanged or only slightly decreased with an increase in odorantconcentrations, suggesting that odorants are well discriminatedeven at high concentrations. In the odorant pairs with closelyrelated molecular structures, the degree of discrimination wasdecreased with an increase in odorant concentrations. An increasein the temperature of turtle olfactory epithelium also decreasedthe ability to discriminate these odorants. There was a goodcorrelation between changes in the odor discriminating abilityinduced by an increase in odor concentrations and those inducedby a temperature increase. The liposomes were made of lipidsextracted from the turtle olfactory epithelia and changes oftheir membrane fluidity induced by adsorption of odorants weremonitored with DPH. There was a good correlation between a decreasein odor discriminating ability and the membrane fluidity changesinduced by odorants. We suggest that decreases in odor discriminatingability induced either by an increase in odor concentrationor by a temperature increase are ultimately caused by changesin the membrane fluidity. Chem. Senses 22: 553–563, 1997.     

Modeling inspiratory and expiratory steady-state velocity fields in the Sprague-Dawley rat nasal cavity

Distribution patterns of odorant molecules in the rat nasal olfactory region depend in large part on the detailed airflow patterns in the nasal cavity, which in turn depend on the anatomical structure. To investigate these flow patterns, we constructed an anatomically accurate finite element model of the right nasal cavity of the Sprague-Dawley rat based on horizontal (anterior-posterior) nasal cast cross sections. By numerically solving the fluid mechanical momentum and continuity equations using the finite element method, we studied the flow distribution and the complete velocity field for both inspiration and expiration throughout the nasal cavity under physiological flow rates of resting breathing and sniffing. Detailed velocity profiles, volumetric flow distributions, and streamline patterns for quasi-steady airflow are presented. S-shaped streamlines passing through the olfactory region are found to be less prevalent during expiratory than inspiratory flow leading to trapping and an increase in odorant molecule retention in the olfactory region during sniffing. The rat nasal velocity calculations will be used to study the distribution of odorant uptake onto the rat olfactory mucosa and compare it with the known anatomic location of some types of rat olfactory receptors.     

Olfactory receptor cells respond to odors in a tissue and semiconductor hybrid neuron chip

Olfactory systems of human beings and animals have the abilities to sense and distinguish varieties of odors. In this study, a bioelectronic nose was constructed by fixing biological tissues onto the surface of light-addressable potentiometric sensor (LAPS) to mimic human olfaction and realize odor differentiation. The odorant induced potentials on tissue-semiconductor interface was analyzed by sensory transduction theory and sheet conductor model. The extracellular potentials of the receptor cells in the olfactory epithelium were detected by LAPS. Being stimulated by different odorants, such as acetic acid and butanedione, olfactory epithelium activities were analyzed on basis of local field potentials and presented different firing modes. The signals fired in different odorants could be distinguished into different clusters by principal component analysis (PCA). Therefore, with cellular populations well preserved, the epithelium tissue and LAPS hybrid system will be a promising neuron chip of olfactory biosensors for odor detecting.     

Combinatorial receptor codes for odors

The discriminatory capacity of the mammalian olfactory system is such that thousands of volatile chemicals are perceived as having distinct odors. Here we used a combination of calcium imaging and single-cell RT-PCR to identify odorant receptors (ORs) for odorants with related structures but varied odors. We found that one OR recognizes multiple odorants and that one odorant is recognized by multiple ORs, but that different odorants are recognized by different combinations of ORs. Thus, the olfactory system uses a combinatorial receptor coding scheme to encode odor identities. Our studies also indicate that slight alterations in an odorant, or a change in its concentration, can change its "code," potentially explaining how such changes can alter perceived odor quality.     

Synthesis and Olfactory Characterization of Silicon‐Containing Derivatives of the Acyclic Lily‐of‐the‐Valley Odorant 5,7,7‐Trimethyl‐4‐methylideneoctanal

5‐Methyl‐4‐methylidene‐6‐(trimethylsilyl)hexanal ( 1b ), a sila analog of the acyclic lily‐of‐the‐valley odorant 5,7,7‐trimethyl‐4‐methylideneoctanal ( 1a ), and the Si‐containing derivatives 2 – 6 were prepared in multistep syntheses, starting from Cl₃SiH and Cl₂SiMe₂, respectively. Compounds 1b, 2 – 6 , and their new precursors were characterized by elemental analyses (C, H, N) and NMR spectroscopic studies (¹H, ¹³C, ¹⁵N, and ²⁹Si). To gain more information about the structure? odor correlation in the family of lily‐of‐the‐valley or ‘muguet’ odorants, C/Si analogs 1a / 1b and derivatives 2 – 6 were evaluated for their olfactory properties.     

A novel mechanism of ligand binding and release in the odorant binding protein 20 from the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae

Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes that transmit malaria are attracted to humans by the odor molecules that emanate from skin and sweat. Odorant binding proteins (OBPs) are the first component of the olfactory apparatus to interact with odorant molecules, and so present potential targets for preventing transmission of malaria by disrupting the normal olfactory responses of the insect. AgamOBP20 is one of a limited subset of OBPs that it is preferentially expressed in female mosquitoes and its expression is regulated by blood feeding and by the day/night light cycles that correlate with blood‐feeding behavior. Analysis of AgamOBP20 in solution reveals that the apo‐protein exhibits significant conformational heterogeneity but the binding of odorant molecules results in a significant conformational change, which is accompanied by a reduction in the conformational flexibility present in the protein. Crystal structures of the free and bound states reveal a novel pathway for entrance and exit of odorant molecules into the central‐binding pocket, and that the conformational changes associated with ligand binding are a result of rigid body domain motions in α‐helices 1, 4, and 5, which act as lids to the binding pocket. These structures provide new insights into the specific residues involved in the conformational adaptation to different odorants and have important implications in the selection and development of reagents targeted at disrupting normal OBP function.     

Olfactory physiology in the Drosophila antenna and maxillary palp: acj6 Distinguishes two classes of odorant pathways

This article provides characterization of the electrical response to odorants in the Drosophila antenna and provides physiological evidence that a second organ, the maxillary palp, also has olfactory function in Drosophila. The acj6 mutation, previously isolated by virtue of defective olfactory behavior, affects olfactory physiology in the maxillary palp as well as in the antenna. Interestingly, abnormal chemosensory jump 6 (acj6) reduces response in the maxillary palp to all odorants tested except benzaldehyde (odor of almond), as if response to benzaldehyde is mediated through a different type of odorant pathway from the other odorants. In other experiments, different parts of the antenna are shown to differ with respect to odorant sensitivity. Evidence is also provided that antennal response to odorants varies with age, and that odorants differ in their age dependence. © 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

From Cassyrane to Cashmeran – The Molecular Parameters of Odorants

This review, including some new experimental results, is the summary of a talk at the ‘flavors & fragrances 2013’ conference in Leipzig, organized jointly by the GDCh, the Liebig‐Vereinigung, and the EuCheMS. After times of searching for natural odor principles and serendipitous discoveries by chemical inspiration, directed odorant design today offers the highest hit rates for the discovery of new odorants, although serendipity still plays a role. Keeping intact the electronic shape required for a certain olfactophore‐binding geometry, one can add or subtract structural elements, rigidify molecular structures, or introduce more structural flexibility. To find out which structural features are critical, the ‘seco‐approach’, in which different fragments are removed by cutting strategic bonds, is the most analytical. Following this approach, such ingredients as Serenolide, Sylkolide, and Pomarose were designed. Transferring this design principle from the family of damascones to that of the theaspiranes led to the discovery of Cassyrane, though completely different structural features turned out to be relevant. Application of the seco‐concept to a 3,7a‐substituted 2,6,7,7a‐tetrahydro‐1H‐inden‐5‐yl musk lead structure derived from carotol resulted in the discovery of a new family of dienone musks with novel structure? odor correlations. However, cutting the C(2)? O bond of Cassyrane and oxidizing the resulting seco‐structure to the 1,2,5,1″‐tetradehydro derivative links the family of dienone musks with that of blackcurrant odorants, but the resulting target structures turned out to be potent orris odorants. (3E,5E)‐5‐(tert‐Butyl)octadeca‐3,5‐dien‐2‐one even possesses the lowest odor threshold in the whole ionone family (0.036 ng/l air), which could be rationalized by a superposition analysis on (?)‐cis‐γ‐irone. In the course of the synthesis of these high‐impact orris odorants, we discovered that, depending on the reaction conditions, the dehydration step of the intermediate 5‐hydroxyalk‐3‐yn‐2‐ones was accompanied by a carbenium‐ion rearrangement. Depending on the substitution pattern, these rearrangement products and their derivatives possessed interesting musky‐woody olfactory properties reminiscent of Cashmeran, demonstrating that the same structural elements can code for completely different odors, i.e., cassis, musk, orris, violet, and Cashmeran‐type, depending only on their spatial arrangement.     

Odorant‐specific requirements for arrestin function in Drosophila olfaction

The ability to modulate olfactory sensitivity is necessary to detect chemical gradients and discriminate among a multitude of odor stimuli. Desensitization of odorant receptors has been postulated to occur when arrestins prevent the activation of downstream second messengers. A paucity of in vivo data on olfactory desensitization prompts use of Drosophila melanogaster genetics to investigate arrestins' role in regulating olfactory signaling pathways. Physiological analysis of peripheral olfactory sensitivity reveals decreased responsiveness to a host of chemically distinct odorants in flies deficient for arrestin1 (arr1), arrestin2 (arr2), or both. These phenotypes are manifest in odorant‐ and dose‐ dependent fashions. Additionally, mutants display altered adaptive properties under a prolonged exposure paradigm. Behaviorally, arr1 mutants are impaired in olfactory‐based orientation towards attractive odor sources. As the olfactory deficits vary according to chemical identity and concentration, they indicate that a spectrum of arrestin activity is essential for odor processing depending upon the particular olfactory pathway involved. Arrestin mutant phenotypes are hypothesized to be a consequence of down‐regulation of olfactory signaling to avoid cellular excitotoxicity. Importantly, phenotypic rescue of olfactory defects in arr1¹ mutants is achieved through transgenic expression of wild‐type arr1. Taken together, these data clearly indicate that arrestins are required in a stimulus‐specific manner for wild type olfactory function and add another level of complexity to peripheral odor coding mechanisms that ultimately impact olfactory behavior. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Neurobiol, 2005     

Numerical modeling of odorant uptake in the rat nasal cavity

An anatomically accurate 3-dimensional numerical model of the right rat nasal cavity was developed and used to compute low, medium, and high flow rate inspiratory and expiratory mucosal odorant uptake (imposed patterning) for 3 odorants with different mucus solubilities. The computed surface mass flux distributions were compared with anatomic receptor gene expression zones identified in the literature. In general, simulations predicted that odorants that were highly soluble in mucus were absorbed dorsally and medially, corresponding roughly to receptors from one of the gene expression zones. Insoluble odorants tended to be absorbed more peripherally in the rat olfactory region corresponding to the other 2 zones. These findings also agreed in general with the electroolfactogram measurements and the voltage-sensitive dye measurements reported in the literature. This numerical approach is the first to predict detailed odorant flux information across the olfactory mucosa in the rat nasal cavity during inspiratory and expiratory flow and to relate it to anatomic olfactory receptor location, physiological function, and biochemical experiment. This numerical technique can allow us to separate the contributions of imposed and inherent patterning mechanisms on the rat olfactory mucosa.     

Relationship between the differential adsorption of odorants by the olfactory mucus and their perception in mixtures

It was proposed recently that the differential adsorption ofodorants by the olfactory mucus may constitute the first stepin the processing of odor mixtures [Laing, D.G. (1988) Ann.NY Acad. Sci., 510, 61–66]. In the present study psychophysicalprocedures were used to determine if there was a relationshipbetween differential adsorption by the olfactory mucus and theperception of odorants of different polarity in binary mixtures.With the eight odor pairs studied, differential adsorption andthe polarity of an odorant were not predictors of how well anodorant would be perceived in a mixture or how it would suppressor enhance the perception of other odorants.     

Reshaping of bulbar odor response by nasal flow rate in the rat

Background

The impact of respiratory dynamics on odor response has been poorly studied at the olfactory bulb level. However, it has been shown that sniffing in the behaving rodent is highly dynamic and varies both in frequency and flow rate. Bulbar odor response could vary with these sniffing parameter variations. Consequently, it is necessary to understand how nasal airflow can modify and shape odor response at the olfactory bulb level.

Methodology and Principal Findings

To assess this question, we used a double cannulation and simulated nasal airflow protocol on anesthetized rats to uncouple nasal airflow from animal respiration. Both mitral/tufted cell extracellular unit activity and local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded. We found that airflow changes in the normal range were sufficient to substantially reorganize the response of the olfactory bulb. In particular, cellular odor-evoked activities, LFP oscillations and spike phase-locking to LFPs were strongly modified by nasal flow rate.

Conclusion

Our results indicate the importance of reconsidering the notion of odor coding as odor response at the bulbar level is ceaselessly modified by respiratory dynamics.     

Learning to smell the roses: experience-dependent neural plasticity in human piriform and orbitofrontal cortices

It is widely presumed that odor quality is a direct outcome of odorant structure, but human studies indicate that molecular knowledge of an odorant is not always sufficient to predict odor quality. Indeed, the same olfactory input may generate different odor percepts depending on prior learning and experience. Combining functional magnetic resonance imaging with an olfactory paradigm of perceptual learning, we examined how sensory experience modifies odor perception and odor quality coding in the human brain. Prolonged exposure to a target odorant enhanced perceptual differentiation for odorants related in odor quality or functional group, an effect that was paralleled by learning-induced response increases in piriform cortex and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). Critically, the magnitude of OFC activation predicted subsequent improvement in behavioral differentiation. Our findings suggest that neural representations of odor quality can be rapidly updated through mere perceptual experience, a mechanism that may underlie the development of odor perception.     

Response patterns of single neurons in the tortoise olfactory epithelium and olfactory bulb

The responses to odor stimulation of 40 single units in the olfactory mucosa and of 18 units in the olfactory bulb of the tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) were recorded with indium-filled, Pt-black-tipped microelectrodes. The test battery consisted of 27 odorants which were proved effective by recording from small bundles of olfactory nerve. Two concentrations of each odorant were employed. These values were adjusted for response magnitudes equal to those for amyl acetate at –2.5 and –3.5 log concentration in olfactory twig recording. Varying concentrations were generated by an injection-type olfactometer. The mucosal responses were exclusively facilitory with a peak frequency of 16 impulses/sec. 19 mucosal units responded to at least one odorant and each unit was sensitive to a limited number of odorants (1–15). The sensitivity pattern of each unit was highly individual, with no clear-cut types, either chemical or qualitative, emerging. Of the 18 olfactory bulb units sampled, all responded to at least one odorant. The maximum frequency observed during a response was 39 impulses/sec. The bulbar neurons can be classified into two types. There are neurons that respond exclusively with facilitation and others that respond with facilitation to some odorants and with inhibition to others. Qualitatively or chemically similar odorants did not generate similar patterns across bulbar units.