Nucleotide sequence of the histone gene cluster in the coral acropora formosa (cnidaria; scleractinia): Features of histone gene structure and organization are common to diploblastic and triploblastic metazoans

We report the nucleotide sequence of the core histone gene cluster from the Cnidarian Acropora formosa. This is the first histone gene cluster to be sequenced from a diploblastic organism and the predicted amino acid sequences most resemble those of sea urchin equivalents. Each of the Cnidarian histone genes has two conserved regions 3 of the coding sequences and these closely resemble those of the metazoan a-class histone genes. In A. formosa the core histone genes are arranged as opposed (H3/H4 and H2A/H2B) pairs, a pattern common to the nondeuterostome metazoa, and tandem repetition is the predominant pattern of organization in the Cnidarian. With the recent identification of several classes of homeobox genes in Cnidarians these features clearly align the Cnidaria with triploblastic metazoans, supporting a monophyletic origin of the metazoa.     

The organization,localization and nucleotide sequence of the histone genes of the midge Chironomus thummi

Several histone gene repeating units containing the genes for histones H1, H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 were isolated by screening a genomic DNA library from the midge Chironomus thummi ssp. thummi. The nucleotide sequence of one complete histone gene repeating unit was determined. This repeating unit contains one copy of each of the five histone genes in the order and orientation H3 H4 H2A H2B H1. The overall length is 6262 bp. The orientation, nucleotide sequence and inferred amino acid sequence as well as the chromosomal arrangement and localization are different from those reported for Drosophila melanogaster. The codon usage also shows marked differences between Chironomus and Drosophila. Thus the histone gene structure reported for Drosophila is not typical of all insects.by H. Jäckle     

Molecular evolutionary analysis of a histone gene repeating unit from Drosophila simulans

A repeating unit of the histone gene cluster from Drosophila simulans containing the H1, H2A, H2B and H4 genes (the H3 gene region has already been analyzed) was cloned and analyzed. A nucleotide sequence of about 4.6 kbp was determined to study the nucleotide divergence and molecular evolution of the histone gene cluster. Comparison of the structure and nucleotide sequence with those of Drosophila melanogaster showed that the four histone genes were located at identical positions and in the same directions. The proportion of different nucleotide sites was 6.3% in total. The amino acid sequence of H1 was divergent, with a 5.1% difference. However, no amino acid change has been observed for the other three histone proteins. Analysis of the GC contents and the base substitution patterns in the two lineages, D. melanogaster and D. simulans, with a common ancestor showed the following. 1) A strong negative correlation was found between the GC content and the nucleotide divergence in the whole repeating unit. 2) The mode of molecular evolution previously found for the H3 gene was also observed for the whole repeating unit of histone genes; the nucleotide substitutions were stationary in the 3' and spacer regions, and there was a directional change of the codon usage to the AT-rich codons. 3) No distinct difference in the mode or pattern of molecular evolution was detected for the histone gene repeating unit in the D. melanogaster and D. simulans lineages. These results suggest that selectional pressure for the coding regions of histones, which eliminate A and T, is less effective in the D. melanogaster and D. simulans lineages than in the other GC-rich species.     

Gene activation at a distance and telomeric silencing are not affected by yeast histone H1

Until recently, it was believed that the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has no histone H1 gene. However, a search of the yeast genome database revealed a possible H1 homologue of 258 amino acids, termed yeast histone H1 (HHO1). The protein shows 36% identity to the human H1 core domain over a stretch of 93 amino acids. Unlike other H1 proteins, Hho1p has a second possible core domain which shows 43% identity to the first core domain. Since vertebrate H1 histone had been implied in gene repression as well as gene activation at a distance, we tested the effect of deleting the yeast H1-like gene on remote activation of a modified GAL1 promoter, which contains a synthetic GAL4 binding site close to the TATA box, and the natural UAS_G, consisting of four GAL4 binding sites. Different spacing up to 1.8 kb between the proximal binding site and the distal UAS_G enhancer revealed no differences in gene activation between wild-type and knockout strains. Overexpression of a heterologous histone H1 from sea urchin showed an overall inhibition of gene activation by the GAL1 promoter, whereas overexpression of the yeast histone H1 had no effect. Also, the expression of A1, ALPHA2 or SUC2 genes, all of which are known to be responsive to an altered chromatin structure, was unchanged in HHO1 knockout or HHO1-overexpressing strains when compared to wild-type cells. We also considered the possibility that HHO1 was involved in forming the heterochromatin at telomeres. On testing for telomeric silencing of a URA reporter gene introduced 1.3 kb away from the chromosomal end, we again observed no differences between wild-type and knockout strains. Thus, the yeast histone H1-like gene appears to have no role in gene activation at a distance or in silencing under the conditions tested. It remains to be seen whether the yeast H1 histone is a gene-specific regulator rather than a general chromatin-associated protein. Received: 16 April 1997 / Accepted: 4 July 1997     

A series of repetitive DNA sequences are associated with human core and H1 histone genes

Summary Repetitive DNA sequences, derived from the human β-globin gene cluster, were mapped within a series of human genomic DNA segments containing core (H2A, H2B, H3 and H4) and H1 histone genes. Cloned recombinant λCH4A phage with human histone gene inserts were analyzed by Southern blot analysis using the following³²P-labeled (nick translated) repetitive sequences as probes:Alu I,Kpn I and LTR-like. A cloned DNA designated RS002-5′C6 containing (i)a (TG)₁₆ simple repeat, (ii) an (ATTTT)n repeat and (iii)a 52 base pair alternating purine and pyrimidine sequence was also used as a radiolabelled hybridization probe. Analysis of 12 recombinant phage, containing 6 arrangements of core histone genes, indicated the presence ofAlu I,Kpn and RS002-5′C6 repetitive sequences. In contrast, analysis of 4 human genomic DNA segments, containing both core and H1 histone genes, indicated the presence of onlyAlu I family sequences. LTR-like sequences were not detected in association with any of the core or H1 histone genes examined. These results suggest that human histone and β-globin genes share certain aspects of sequence organization in flanking regions despite marked differences in their overall structure and pattern of expression.     

The sequence and organization of the core histone H3 and H4 genes in the early branching amitochondriate protistTrichomonas vaginalis

Among the unicellular protists, several of which are parasitic, some of the most divergent eukaryotic species are found. The evolutionary distances between protists are so large that even slowly evolving proteins like histones are strongly divergent. In this study we isolated cDNA and genomic histone H3 and H4 clones fromTrichomonas vaginalis. Two histone H3 and three histone H4 genes were detected on three genomic clones with one complete H3 and two complete H4 sequences. H3 and H4 genes were divergently transcribed with very short intergenic regions of only 194 bp, which containedT. vaginalis-specific as well as histone-specific putative promoter elements. Southern blot analysis showed that there may be several more histone gene pairs. The two complete histone H4 genes were different on the nucleotide level but encoded the same amino acid sequence. Comparison of the amino acid sequences of theT. vaginalis H3 and H4 histones with sequences from animals, fungi, and plants as well as other protists revealed a significant divergence not only from the sequences in multicellular organisms but especially from the sequences in other protists likeEntamoeba histolytica, Trypanosoma cruzi, andLeishmania infantum.     

Isolation and sequence analysis of sea urchin (Lytechinus pictus) histone H4 messenger RNA

Histone messenger RNAs isolated from early blastula stage Lytechinus pictus sea urchin embryos have been separated into discrete RNA bands on polyacrylamide gels. The most rapidly migrating of these molecules, the putative histone H4 mRNA, has been digested with T₁ ribonuclease to generate oligonucleotides for nucleotide sequence analysis. Many of these sequences are colinear with the highly conserved amino acid sequence of histone H4 protein as determined for both cows and peas.Histone H4 messenger RNA hybridizes in conditions of DNA excess to sea urchin DNA which is repeated approximately 470-fold. Despite this level of repetition the nucleotide sequence of the H4 messenger RNA reflects little evolutionary divergence within the H4 genes of L. pictus as judged by the stoichiometric yield of T₁ oligonucleotides and the hybridization and thermal stability of histone H4 mRNA-DNA hybrids.     

Sequence, organization and expression of the core histone genes of Aspergillus nidulans

Summary The core histone gene family ofAspergillus nidulans was characterized. The H2A, H2B and H3 genes are unique in theA. nidulans genome. In contrast there are two H4 genes, H4.1 and H4.2. As previously reported for the H2A gene (May and Morris 1987) introns also interrupt the other core histone genes. The H2B gene, like the H2A gene, is interrupted by three introns, the H3 and H4.1 gene are each interrupted by two introns and the H4.2 gene contains one intron. The position of the single intron in H4.2 is the same as that the first intron of the H4.1 gene. The H2A and H2B genes are arranged as a gene pair separated by approximately 600 by and are divergently transcribed. The H3 and H4.1 genes are similarly arranged and are separated by approximately 800 bp. The H4.2 gene is not closely linked to either the H2A-H2B or H3-H4.1 gene pairs. Using pulse field gel electrophoresis an electrophoretic karyotype was established forA. nidulans. This karyotype was used to assign the H3–H4.1 gene pair and the H4.2 gene to linkage group VIII and the H2A–H2B gene pair to either linkage group III or VI. The abundance of each of the histone messenger RNAs was determined to be cell cycle regulated but the abundance of the H4.2 mRNA appears to be regulated differently from the others.     

Drosophila virilis histone gene clusters lacking H1 coding segments

Summary Approximately 30–40% ofDrosophila virilis DNA complementary to clonedDrosophila histone genes is reduced to 3.4-kilobase-pair (kbp) segments by Bgl I or Bgl II digestion. The core histone genes of a 3.4-kbp Bgl II segment cloned in the plasmid pDv3/3.4 have the same order as theD. melanogaster core histone genes in the plasmid cDm500: . Nonetheless, pDv3/3.4 and cDm500 have different histone gene configurations: In pDv3/3.4, the region between the H2B and H3 genes contains 0.35 kbp and cannot encode histone H1; in cDm500, the region contains 2.0 kbp and encodes histone H1. The lack of an H1 gene between the H2B and H3 genes in 30–40% ofD. virilis histone gene clusters suggests that changes in histone gene arrays have occurred during the evolution ofDrosophila. The ancestors of modernDrosophila may have possessed multiple varieties of histone gene clusters, which were subsequently lost differentially in thevirilis andmelanogaster lineages. Alternatively, they may have possessed a single variety, which was rearranged during evolution. The H1 genes ofD. virilis andD. melanogaster did not cross-hybridize in vitro under conditions that maintain stable duplexes between DNAs that are 75% homologous. Consequently,D. virilis H1 genes could not be visualized by hybridization to an H1-specific probe and thus remain unidentified. Our observations suggest that the coding segments in the H1 genes ofD. virilis andD. melanogaster are >25% divergent. Our estimate of sequence divergence in the H1 genes ofD. virilis andD. melanogaster seems high until one considers that the coding sequences of cloned H1 genes from the closely related speciesD. melanogaster andD. simulans are 5% divergent.     

Low codon bias and high rates of synonymous substitution in Drosophila hydei and D. melanogaster histone genes

We have evaluated codon usage bias in Drosophila histone genes and have obtained the nucleotide sequence of a 5,161-bp D. hydei histone gene repeat unit. This repeat contains genes for all five histone proteins (H1, H2a, H2b, H3, and H4) and differs from the previously reported one by a second EcoRI site. These D. hydei repeats have been aligned to each other and to the 5.0-kb (i.e., long) and 4.8-kb (i.e., short) histone repeat types from D. melanogaster. In each species, base composition at synonymous sites is similar to the average genomic composition and approaches that in the small intergenic spacers of the histone gene repeats. Accumulation of synonymous changes at synonymous sites after the species diverged is quite high. Both of these features are consistent with the relatively low codon usage bias observed in these genes when compared with other Drosophila genes. Thus, the generalization that abundantly expressed genes in Drosophila have high codon bias and low rates of silent substitution does not hold for the histone genes.      

Difference in larval type explains patterns of nonsynonymous substitutions in two ancient paralogs of the histone H3 gene in sea stars

SUMMARY Paralogous genes frequently show differences in patterns and rates of substitution that are typically attributed to different selection regimes, mutation rates, or local recombination rates. Here, two anciently diverged paralogous copies of the histone H3 gene in sea stars, the tandem‐repetitive early‐stage gene and a newly isolated gene with lower copy number that was termed the “putative late‐stage histone H3 gene” were analyzed in 69 species with varying mode of larval development. The two genes showed differences in relative copy number, overall substitution rates, nucleotide composition, and codon usage, but similar patterns of relative nonsynonymous substitution rates, when analyzed by the d_N/d_S ratio. Sea stars with a nonpelagic and nonfeeding larval type (i.e., brooding lineages) were observed to have d_N/d_S ratios that were larger than for nonbrooders but equal between the two paralogs. This finding suggested that demographic differences between brooding and nonbrooding lineages were responsible for the elevated d_N/d_S ratios observed for brooders and refuted a suggestion from a previous analysis of the early‐stage gene that the excess nonsynonymous substitutions were due to either (1) gene expression differences at the larval stage between brooders and nonbrooders or (2) the highly repetitive structure of the early‐stage histone H3 gene.     

Conserved organization of an avian histone gene cluster with inverted duplications of H3 and H4 genes

Summary The organization of histone gene clusters of the duckCairina moschata was studied in the DNA inserts of two recombinant phage that overlap and feature identical histone gene arrangements but differ in sequence details and in the extent of repetition of an AT-rich motif in one of the nontranscribed spacer regions. These few but substantial differences between otherwise nearly identical histone gene groups suggest that we have independently isolated alleles of the same site of the duck genome or that this gene arrangement occurs (with slight variations) more than once per haploid genome. Within the histone gene cluster described, H3 and H4 genes are duplicated (with inverted orientation), whereas one H1 gene is flanked by single H2A and H2B genes. The arrangement of duck histone genes described here is identical to a subsection of the chicken genome but differs from any other published histone gene cluster.