CYFIP dependent actin remodeling controls specific aspects of Drosophila eye morphogenesis

Cell rearrangements shape organs and organisms using molecular pathways and cellular processes that are still poorly understood. Here we investigate the role of the Actin cytoskeleton in the formation of the Drosophila compound eye, which requires extensive remodeling and coordination between different cell types. We show that CYFIP/Sra-1, a member of the WAVE/SCAR complex and regulator of Actin remodeling, controls specific aspects of eye architecture: rhabdomere extension, rhabdomere terminal web organization, adherens junctions, retina depth and basement membrane integrity. We demonstrate that some phenotypes manifest independently, due to defects in different cell types. Mutations in WAVE/SCAR and in ARP2/3 complex subunits but not in WASP, another major regulator of Actin nucleation, phenocopy CYFIP defects. Thus, the CYFIP-SCAR-ARP2/3 pathway orchestrates specific tissue remodeling processes.     

The eye of Drosophila as a model system for studying intracellular signaling in ontogenesis and pathogenesis

Many human diseases are caused by malfunction of basic types of cellular activity such as proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, cell polarization, and migration. In turn, these processes are associated with different routes of intracellular signal transduction. A number of model systems have been designed to study normal and abnormal cellular and molecular processes associated with pathogenesis. The developing eye of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is one of these systems. The sequential development of compound eyes of this insect makes it possible to model human neurodegenerative diseases and mechanisms of carcinogenesis. In this paper we overview the program of the eye development in Drosophila, with emphasis on intracellular signaling pathways that regulate this complex process. We discuss in detail the roles of the Notch, Hedgehog, TGFβ, Wnt, and receptor tyrosine kinase signaling pathways in Drosophila eye development and human pathology. We also briefly describe the modern methods of experimentation with this model organism to analyze the function of human pathogenic proteins.     

The early stages of ommatidial development in the flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera; Tenebrionidae)

 Using electron microscopy, the first stages of ommatidial development in the flour beetle Tribolium castaneum were analysed in relation to the cellular architecture of the adult compound eye and were compared to the corresponding patterning process in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. The ommatidia of the slightly horse-shoe shaped beetle compound eye contain six peripheral and two central retinula cells. The rhabdomere of the posteriorly located central photoreceptor cell is restricted to the distal half of the rhabdom whilst that of the anterior one is restricted to its proximal half. The development of the compound eye takes place in an external eye imaginal disc. Most stages of ommatidial development, as known from Drosophila, i.e. arc-like cell groups, five-cell clusters, immature eight-cell clusters and symmetrical eight-cell clusters, are very precisely conserved between the two species. Two major differences exist: 1. In Tribolium, the cone cell precursor cells synchronously join to the immature eight-cell cluster. As a consequence, the symmetrical eight-cell cluster immediately transforms into a four-cone-cell cluster. 2. The maturing ommatidia do not undergo rotation in Tribolium. Overall, no morphological indiation for an equator in the adult Tribolium compound eye could be found. Considering the strong evolutionary conservation of early ommatidial development, homology of photoreceptor cells of distantly related insects is proposed to be inferred from their ontogenetic origin. Received: 6 November 1995 / Accepted: 9 April 1996     

Photoreceptor morphogenesis and retinal degeneration: lessons from Drosophila

Cells exhibit an amazingly wide range of different forms, and in most cases the shape of a cell is crucial for performing its specific function(s). But how does a cell obtain its particular shape during development, how can the shape be adapted to different environmental conditions, and what are the consequences if morphogenesis is impaired? An ideal cell type to study these questions is the photoreceptor cell, a photosensitive cell present in most metazoa, highly specialised to transform the energy from the light into a visual response. In the last few years, studies in the Drosophila eye have led to a considerable increase in understanding of the genetic control of photoreceptor morphogenesis; lessons, which may apply to other cell types as well. Most of the genes involved have been conserved during evolution, and mutations in several of them result in retinal degeneration, both in flies and humans. This makes the fly eye an attractive model to unravel the genetic, molecular and cell biological basis of the mechanisms that prevent retinal dystrophies.     

The effect of temperature onshibire ts cell clones in the compound eye ofDrosophila melanogaster

Summary We have analysed the effect of temperature on both developing and adult eye cell clones homozygous forshi ^ST139, a temperature-sensitive mutant ofDrosophila melanogaster. The mutant gene, autonomous in its cellular expression, causes structural modifications of ommatidial cells when adult clones of cells are exposed to the restrictive temperature (29°C) for several days. However, the mutant phenotype reverses to normal within 4 days at the permissive temperature (20°C). The results of pulse, shift-up and shift-down experiments show that the temperaturesensitive period for developing compound eye cells is from the late second instar up to the early pupa. Cytodifferentiation of compound eye cells is blocked by restrictive temperature treatment during this period, whereas cell proliferation does not seem to be directly affected. These results are discussed with regard to the other known aspects of the phenotype observed in mutant individuals.     

The Anostracan Rhabdom and the Basement Membrane. An Ultrastructural Study of the Artemia Compound Eye (Crustacea)

Abstract The ommatidia of the compound eyes of Artemia salina L. are normally composed of four crystalline cone cells containing glycogen. The cells are enveloped by two so-called “cellules épidermiques juxta-cristallines”. There are also six pigmented retinula cells, all contributing to the rhabdom. A peculiar feature of the Artemia crystalline cone cells is that their elongated parts, the so-called cone cell roots, widen and flatten proximally, forming interdigitating “endfeet”. The basement membrane thus consists of a cellular portion combined with the basal lamina. The main mass of the rhabdom of the Artemia eye is built up by five retinula cells, two contributing a smaller part. The microvilli are oriented in four directions, two being orthogonal. The sixth cell contributes on two small portions to the rhabdom in the distalmost and a more proximal position. The rest of it runs axon-like outside the omnatidium. Where the sixth cell wedges in, the direction of the microvilli is changed and has no orthogonal pattern. Two rhabdom types of compound eyes are distinguished: the decapod or banded or layered rhabdom: and the anostracan rhabdom with continuous rhabdomeres.     

Phylogeny of the Myriapoda – Crustacea – Insecta: a new attempt using photoreceptor structure*

According to molecular sequence data Crustacea and not Myriapoda seem to be the sister‐group to Insecta. This makes it necessary to reconsider how the morphology of their eyes fit with these new cladograms. Homology of facetted eye structures in Insecta (Hexapoda in the sense of Ento‐ and Ectognatha) and Crustacea is clearly supported by identical numbers of cells in an ommatidium (two corneageneous or primary pigment cells, four Semper cells which build the crystalline cone and primarily eight retinula cells). These cell numbers are retained even when great functional modification occurs, especially in the region of the dioptric apparatus. There are two different possibilities to explain differences in eye structure in Myriapoda depending on their phylogenetic position in the cladogram of Mandibulata. In the traditional Tracheata cladogram, eyes of Myriapoda must be secondarily modified. This modification can be explained using the different evolutionary pathways of insect facetted eyes to insect larval eyes (stemmata) as an analogous model system. Comparative morphology of larval insect eyes from all holometabolan orders shows that there are several evolutionary pathways which have led to different types of stemmata and that the process always involved the breaking up the compound eye into individual larval ommatidia. Further evolution led on many occasions to so‐called fusion‐stemmata that occur convergently in each holometabolic order and reveals, in part, great structural similarities to the lateral ocelli of myriapods. As myriapodan eyes cannot be regarded as typical mandibulate ommatidia, their structure can be explained as a modified complex eye evolved in a comparable way to the development to the fusion‐stemmata of insect larvae. The facetted eyes of Scutigera (Myriapoda, Chilopoda) must be considered as secondarily reorganized lateral myriapodan stemmata, the so‐called ‘pseudo‐compound eyes’. New is a crystalline cone‐like vitreous body within the dioptric apparatus. In the new cladogram with Crustacea and Insecta as sister‐groups however, the facetted eyes of Scutigera can be interpreted as an old precursor of the Crustacea – Insecta facetted eye with modified ommatidia having a four‐part crystalline cone, etc. as a synapomorphy. Lateral ocelli of all the other Myriapoda are then modified like insect stemmata. The precursor is then the Scutigera‐Ommatidium. In addition further interpretations of evolutionary pathways of myriapodan morphological characters are discussed.     

The compound eye of<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Scutigera coleoptrata</Emphasis> (Linnaeus, 1758) (Chilopoda: Notostigmophora): an ultrastructural reinvestigation that adds support to the Mandibulata concept

The lateral compound eye of Scutigera coleoptrata was examined by electron microscopy. Each ommatidium consists of a dioptric apparatus, formed by a cornea and a multipartite eucone crystalline cone, a bilayered retinula and a surrounding sheath of primary pigment and interommatidial pigment cells. With reference to the median eye region, each cone is made up of eight cone segments belonging to four cone cells. The nuclei of the cone cells are located proximally outside the cone near the transition area between distal and proximal retinula cells. The connection between nuclear region and cone segment is via a narrow cytoplasmic strand, which splits into two distal cytoplasmic processes. Additionally, from the nuclear region of each cone cell a single cytoplasmic process runs in a proximal direction to the basement membrane. The bilayered rhabdom is usually made up of the rhabdomeres of 9–12 distal retinula cells and four proximal retinula cell. The pigment shield is composed of primary pigment cells (which most likely secrete the corneal lens) and interommatidial pigment cells. The primary pigment cells underlie the cornea and surround, more or less, the upper third of the crystalline cone. By giving rise to the cornea and by functioning as part of the pigment shield these pigment cells serve a double function. Interommatidial pigment cells extend from the cornea to the basement membrane and stabilise the ommatidium. In particular, the presence of cone cells, primary pigment cells as well as interommatidial pigment cells in the compound eye of S. coleoptrata is seen as an important morphological support for the Mandibulata concept. Furthermore, the phylogenetic significance of these cell types is discussed with respect to the Tetraconata.     

Evidence for the priming role of the central retinula cell in ommatidium differentiation of Ephestia kuehniella

Summary In the developing compound eye of Ephestia kuehniella, within the advancing front of differentiation, regular cell clusters arise which consist of a central cell and two flanking cells. The central cell is destined to become the basal retinula cell later in development. Its crucial role in ommatidium formation is confirmed by ³H-thymidine labelling. Eye anlagen labelled early in the pupal stage incorporate thymidine within two distinct zones along the front of differentiation. After the ommatidia are completely differentiated, both zones contain labelled nuclei of all cell types which participate in ommatidia formation. Within the posterior zone, however, the basal retinula cells are always unlabelled, whereas in the anterior they show labelled nuclei. From this observation it must be concluded that the basal retinula cell first terminates proliferation (either alone or together with a few other cells) to become differentiated as the central retinula cell. These results agree with those found in Drosophila and indicate that the ordered stepwise addition of cells to a central founder cell is a widespread principle of ommatidia formation in insects.     

Neuronal development in the Drosophila compound eye: Photoreceptor cells R1, R6, and R7 fail to differentiate in the retina aberrant in pattern (rap) mutant

The compound eye of Drosophila is a reiterated pattern of 800 unit eyes known as ommatidia. In each ommatidium there are eight photoreceptor neurons (R1–R8) and an invariant number of accessory cells organized in a precise manner. In the developing eye, specification of cell fates is triggered by sequential inductive events mediated by cell-cell interactions. The R8 photoreceptor neuron is the first cell to differentiate and is thought to play a central role in the recruitment of the remaining photoreceptor cells. Our previous work demonstrated that mutations in the retina aberrant in pattern (rap) locus lead to abnormal pattern formation in the compound eye. Genetic mosaic experiments demonstrated that for normal retinal patterning to occur, rap gene function is required only in the photoreceptor cell R8. In this study we analyzed the R cell composition of developing as well as the adult eyes of rap mutants employing a variety of R cell specific markers. We show that in rap mutants, although some of the R8-specific markers show normal expression patterns, other aspects of the R8 cell differentiation are abnormal. In addition, the cells R1, R6, and R7 fail to differentiate properly in rap mutants. These results suggest that the rap gene encodes an R8-specific function that plays a role in the determination of the photoreceptor cells R1, R6, and R7. © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

A novel intercellular junction between cone cells in the compound eye of Ephestia kuehniella

A previously unidentified intercellular junction between cone cells in the compound eye of the moth Ephestia is described. The junctions are characterized by deposition of granular material, in register, along portions of the membranes of adjacent cone cells during compound eye development and by a constant intercellular space of 8–10 nm. Accumulation of the cone cell material along localized regions of the cell membrane suggests an interaction between a specialized area of the membrane and a specific cytoplasmic constituent, and the exact matching of the regions of deposition between adjacent cells implies intercellular interaction. The junctional nature of these membrane regions is often obscured in the adult crystalline cone but is inferred from observations on developing cone cells.     

Evolution and development — the nematode vulva as a case study

To understand how morphological characters change during evolution, we need insight into the evolution of developmental processes. Comparative developmental approaches that make use of our fundamental understanding of development in certain model organisms have been initiated for different animal systems and flowering plants. Nematodes provide a useful experimental system with which to investigate the genetic and molecular alterations underlying evolutionary changes of cell fate specification in development, by comparing different species to the genetic model system Caenorhabditis elegans. In this review, I will first discuss the different types of evolutionary alterations seen at the cellular level by focusing mainly on the analysis of vulva development in different species. The observed alterations involve changes in cell lineage, cell migration and cell death, as well as induction and cell competence. I then describe a genetic approach in the nematode Pristionchus pacificus that might identify those genetic and molecular processes that cause evolutionary changes of cell fate specification.     

Conservation of antigen 3G6: A crystalline cone constitutent in the compound eye of arthropods

A monoclonal antibody (MAb), 3G6, highly selective for neuropil glia in the CNS of the house cricket Acheta domesticus, also demonstrates remarkable selectivity for the nonneuronal crystalline cone cells of the compound eye. MAb 3G6 labels cone cells in eucone eyes throughout Insecta, from ancestral forms such as the bristle tail to the more recent honeybee; eucone structures are also recognized in Crustacea. Analogous nonneural structures found in pseudocone or acone eyes also express detectable 3G6 immunoreactivity. Immunoblot analysis demonstrates that MAb 3G6 binds to similar M_r 85 kDa glycoproteins in the cricket CNS and retina, corresponding to the glial and crystalline cone forms of the antigen. Further, polypeptides of similar relative mass are also recognized in the eucone eye of the butterfly Pieris and the pseudocone eye of the fly Calliphora. The properties and function of glycoprotein 3G6 in the CNS and retina are yet to be explored. However, the finding that a unique antigen is highly conserved within the crystalline cone or analogous regions of the retina throughout the Arthropoda lends support at the molecular level to the notion that the arthropod compound eye has a monophyletic origin.     

The planarian <Emphasis Type="Italic">nanos</Emphasis>-like gene Smednos is expressed in germline and eye precursor cells during development and regeneration

Planarians are highly regenerative organisms with the ability to remake all their cell types, including the germ cells. The germ cells have been suggested to arise from totipotent neoblasts through epigenetic mechanisms. Nanos is a zinc-finger protein with a widely conserved role in the maintenance of germ cell identity. In this work, we describe the expression of a planarian nanos-like gene Smednos in two kinds of precursor cells namely, primordial germ cells and eye precursor cells, during both development and regeneration of the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea. In sexual planarians, Smednos is expressed in presumptive male primordial germ cells of embryos from stage 8 of embryogenesis and throughout development of the male gonads and in the female primordial germ cells of the ovary. Thus, upon hatching, juvenile planarians do possess primordial germ cells. In the asexual strain, Smednos is expressed in presumptive male and female primordial germ cells. During regeneration, Smednos expression is maintained in the primordial germ cells, and new clusters of Smednos-positive cells appear in the regenerated tissue. Remarkably, during the final stages of development (stage 8 of embryogenesis) and during regeneration of the planarian eye, Smednos is expressed in cells surrounding the differentiating eye cells, possibly corresponding to eye precursor cells. Our results suggest that similar genetic mechanisms might be used to control the differentiation of precursor cells during development and regeneration in planarians. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.