肠黏膜屏障与肠道菌群的相互关系

摘要：人类肠道中微生物群与肠道环境相互作用以维持机体健康。肠黏膜屏障主要由黏液层、肠道菌群、肠道免疫系统和肠上皮细胞本身的完整性等构成。肠道作为直接与大量菌群接触的器官,其屏障功能在肠道健康中的作用尤为显著。肠道菌群与肠道屏障相互作用,保持肠道菌群与肠道屏障相对稳定,肠道菌群参与肠道免疫反应的建立,共同建立机体天然防御系统,在保持肠道免疫的动态平衡中具有重要作用。当两者之间的平衡被打破时,可诱发功能性胃肠病（如肠易激综合征）及免疫相关性疾病（如炎症性肠病）。本文主要阐述肠黏膜屏障与肠道菌群之间的相互关系以及与肠道屏障功能障碍相关的肠道疾病。     

树突状细胞与肠道免疫

肠道黏膜免疫系统是肠道防御细菌和病毒感染的第一道防线,在维持肠道黏膜自稳方面发挥着重要的作用。肠道黏膜免疫系统持续不断的与来自外界的食物抗原和病原微生物及自身长期共存的肠道菌群相互作用,刺激机体对有害抗原产生免疫应答反应,诱导机体对无害抗原产生免疫耐受。树突状细胞（Dendritic cells,DCs）是目前已知的最强有力的一种专职抗原递呈细胞（Professional antigen presenting cells,APC）,     

肠道微生物与肠上皮细胞互作的免疫调节机制

人体肠道中寄居着数量众多、种类繁异的微生物,其在机体营养吸收、物质代谢以及免疫调节等方面发挥着积极作用,但肠道微生物(gut microbiota)群落结构失调或组织易位则与多种疾病的发生发展密切相关。肠上皮细胞(intestinal epithelial cells)作为机体直接接触众多肠道微生物的第一道屏障,在响应肠道微生物定植、调节肠道微生物群落结构以及维持肠黏膜屏障功能等方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本文将主要从肠黏膜免疫调控的角度,介绍肠道微生物与肠上皮细胞互作分子机制的最新研究进展。     

基于免疫学的胃肠道微生态与胃癌相关研究进展

21世纪,随着人类微生物基因组计划和人类肠道元基因组计划的开展,科学家们越来越关注存在于人体百万亿计的微生物,尤其是机体中最为复杂的胃肠道微生物。同时,肠道黏膜免疫学也是近年来备受关注的研究方向。肠道不仅是消化吸收的代谢场所也是重要的免疫器官,肠黏膜含有丰富的淋巴细胞,它们与肠道微生物相互作用,参与机体的免疫防御、免疫平衡和免疫监视。胃肠道微生态平衡发生紊乱会影响机体免疫应答反应,进而引起疾病的发生发展。本文从免疫学的角度来论述胃肠道微生物在肿瘤尤其是胃癌的发生和治疗中所扮演的角色。     

Toll样受体介导的肠道免疫研究进展

黏膜免疫系统的第一道防线——肠黏膜上皮,不但能区分和识别致病菌和共生菌,而且能启动适当的免疫应答。在机体正常情况下,肠黏膜上皮细胞（IEC）对肠道共生菌持耐受状态,维持肠道内环境的稳定。IEC能识别致病菌的危险信号,激活派伊尔结节,启动免疫应答。有关实验已证实肠黏膜上皮针对肠腔细菌呈“耐受”或“非耐受”状态,主要依赖于Toll样受体（TLRS）介导的信号转导通路。     

肠道和呼吸道菌群与肺部疾病的研究新进展

宿主微生物群落对机体局部以及系统免疫的影响已逐渐引起人们的关注,目前发现局部的微生物群落能够对机体远端部位的免疫能力造成影响。肠道和呼吸道菌群稳态对机体免疫系统发育以及抗病原微生物感染至关重要,肠道和呼吸道菌群失衡与炎症性疾病、代谢性疾病以及过敏性疾病密切相关。肠道和呼吸道菌群失衡会通过"肠—肺轴"的相互作用,引起免疫系统改变与急性、慢性肺部疾病的发生。在这篇综述中,我们对肠道微生物和呼吸道微生物在肠-肺轴中发挥作用的研究进展作一总结,并对从微生物角度进行疾病治疗干预的可能性进行分析。     

双歧杆菌免疫调节作用的研究进展

双歧杆菌是人和动物肠道内最重要的生理性细菌之一,参与宿主的多种生态效应和生理作用,对维持宿主健康起着重要的作用。本文总结了近年来双歧杆菌对肠黏膜上皮细胞的黏附及其引发机体免疫反应的研究进展,并对肠黏膜免疫系统做了简要描述。     

肠道菌群调控黏膜免疫与脓毒症的发病机制

脓毒症和脓毒症休克是临床重症监护室患者的主要死亡原因之一。肠道菌群作为脓毒症过程中重要参与者,其紊乱能激活肠道黏膜免疫,进而影响全身免疫系统,诱发和加剧脓毒症。此外,肠道微生物还能通过"肠道-器官"轴参与脓毒症发生发展过程,针对肠道微生物的靶向治疗能防治脓毒症。本文深入探讨了肠道微生物、肠道黏膜免疫与脓毒症之间的相互作用,以期为临床开发新的疗法提供理论基础。     

动物肠道菌群与宿主肠道免疫系统相互作用的研究进展

作为动物机体中最大的免疫器官之一,动物肠道是机体阻止外源病原体入侵的重要防线。动物肠道中定殖的微生物与宿主的营养物代谢,疾病和免疫系统发育等密切相关。该文主要综述了肠道微生物对于维持肠道屏障完整性的作用、诱导机体T、B淋巴细胞的发育和分化的分子机制及与一些代谢类疾病发生的关系等内容。尽管如此,肠道微生物与宿主免疫系统相互作用的机制还有待深入研究。随着免疫学、微生物学及分子生物学等学科的发展,对动物肠道菌群与宿主免疫系统互作机制的研究也得到快速发展,并为临床上预防和治疗人类疾病提供理论支撑。     

肠道微生物菌群调节中枢神经系统发育及相关疾病的研究进展

人和动物的健康发展与定植在肠道内大量微生物的平衡密切相关且终身相伴.因此,机体与肠道微生物之间关联性功效的探究正日益受到人们的重视并被不断深入.肠道内共生微生物调节宿主的营养吸收和代谢、调控宿主免疫系统的形成和发展,与免疫系统共同维持宿主体内平衡.大量的研究数据表明,肠道微生物与中枢神经系统存在互作关系,并且形成双向通信系统,称之为脑-肠轴.肠道微生物可以通过调节神经系统来改变行为,甚至影响神经系统疾病的发生和发展、调节血脑屏障渗透性及脑内炎症反应等.本文从肠道微生物对脑部发育、功能、中枢神经系统相关疾病的影响等方面进行阐述.     

Interaction of vasoactive intestinal peptide with rat small intestinal epithelial cells after intestinal resection

Specific binding of vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and VIP-stimulated c y c l i c AMP accumulation were studied in small intestinal epithelial cells (both of crypt and villous levels) 3, 7 and 14 d after a 60% resection of the small intestine . The affinity, but not the binding capacity, of VIP receptors decreased during the adaptive hyperplastic response. Basal cyclic AMP levels were similar in cells of both control and resected rats. Resection induced a decrease of potency, but not of efficiency, of VIP on the stimulation of cyclic AMP accumulation.     

肠道微生物对肠道屏障功能完整性的维护机制研究概况

肠道微生物群是一个稳定且复杂的生态系统,可以通过形成菌膜屏障或促进肠道上皮细胞增殖分化等方式形成保护屏障,并在肠道病原菌感染和威胁期间维持和促进免疫稳态中起积极作用。本文重点叙述宿主-肠道微生物相互作用过程中抗病原菌感染的方式,以及肠道微生物参与合成抗菌化合物抵御肠道病原菌入侵和威胁的机制,为调控肠道微生物解决临床胃肠道疾病及其相关症状提供理论参考依据。     

Murine intestinal organoids resemble intestinal epithelium in their microRNA profiles

Intestinal organoids were established as an ex vivo model of the intestinal epithelium. We investigated whether organoids resemble the intestinal epithelium in their microRNA (miRNA) profiles. Total RNA samples were obtained from crypt and villus fractions in murine intestine and from cultured organoids. Microarray analysis showed that organoids largely resembled intestinal epithelial cells in their miRNA profiles. In silico prediction followed by qRT-PCR suggested that six genes are regulated by corresponding miRNAs along the crypt-villus axis, suggesting miRNA regulation of epithelial cell renewal in the intestine. However, such expression patterns of miRNAs and their target mRNAs were not reproduced during organoids maturation. This might be due to lack of luminal factors and endocrine, nervous, and immune systems in organoids and different cell populations between in vivo epithelium and organoids. Nevertheless, we propose that intestinal organoids provide a useful in vitro model to investigate miRNA expression in intestinal epithelial cells.     

Teleost intestinal immunology

Teleosts clearly have a more diffuse gut associated lymphoid system, which is morphological and functional clearly different from the mammalian GALT. All immune cells necessary for a local immune response are abundantly present in the gut mucosa of the species studied and local immune responses can be monitored after intestinal immunization. Fish do not produce IgA, but a special mucosal IgM isotype seems to be secreted and may (partly) be the recently described IgZ/IgT. Fish produce a pIgR in their mucosal tissues but it is smaller (2 ILD) than the 4–5 ILD pIgR of higher vertebrates. Whether teleost pIgR is transcytosed and cleaved off in the same way needs further investigation, especially because a secretory component (SC) is only reported in one species. Teleosts also have high numbers of IEL, most of them are CD3-?⁺/CD8-α⁺ and have cytotoxic and/or regulatory function. Possibly many of these cells are TCRγδ cells and they may be involved in the oral tolerance induction observed in fish. Innate immune cells can be observed in the teleost gut from first feeding onwards, but B cells appear much later in mucosal compartments compared to systemic sites. Conspicuous is the very early presence of putative T cells or their precursors in the fish gut, which together with the rag-1 expression of intestinal lymphoid cells may be an indication for an extra-thymic development of certain T cells. Teleosts can develop enteritis in their antigen transporting second gut segment and epithelial cells, IEL and eosinophils/basophils seem to play a crucial role in this intestinal inflammation model. Teleost intestine can be exploited for oral vaccination strategies and probiotic immune stimulation. A variety of encapsulation methods, to protect vaccines against degradation in the foregut, are reported with promising results but in most cases they appear not to be cost effective yet. Microbiota in fish are clearly different from terrestrial animals. In the past decade a fast increasing number of papers is dedicated to the oral administration of a variety of probiotics that can have a strong health beneficial effect, but much more attention has to be paid to the immune mechanisms behind these effects. The recent development of gnotobiotic fish models may be very helpful to study the immune effects of microbiota and probiotics in teleosts.     

The intestinal LABs

The complete gastrointestinal (GI) tract of humans is colonised soon after birth by a myriad of microbial species with a characteristic distribution depending on the location. GI-tract ecology has been experiencing a revival due to the development of molecular techniques, especially those based on 16S RNA (zRNA) genes. A richer ecosystem than previously imagined of novel species is being discovered that is significantly influenced by our host genotype. Special attention has been focused on the bifidobacteria and the lactic acid bacterial (LAB) populations, both those that are naturally present within this complex ecosystem and those that are ingested as probiotics in functional foods. Overall this interest stems from a increasing awareness of interplay between microflora, diet and the health of the host, and is further stimulated by an increasing incidence of gastrointestinal illnesses and atopy. Substantial documentation of benefits to host health has especially distinguished the LAB for multidisciplinary research aimed to determine the molecular mechanisms involved. Recent advances in molecular technologies, including high-throughput genomics-based approaches, can significantly advance our understanding of the microbe–diet–host interactions and offer valuable information for design and application of health-targeted microbes.     

Relationship between intestinal microecology and the translocation of intestinal bacteria

It is now well known that endogenous bacteria can translocate from the intestinal tract and cause many of the complicating infections seen in severely ill, hospitalized patients. Of the hundreds of bacterial species in the intestinal tract, relatively few aerobic/facultative species appear to translocate with any frequency. Van der Waaij and colleagues (1971, 1972a, 1972b) originally proposed that, by a process termed colonization resistance, strictly anaerobic bacteria prevented the intestinal overgrowth and subsequent translocation of these potentially pathogenic aerobic/facultative bacteria. Selective antimicrobial decontamination, designed to maintain colonization resistance, has been effective in reducing the incidence of infectious morbidity in high risk patients. However, the mechanisms controlling bacterial translocation remain unclear, but appear to depend on host factors, as well as on factors inherent in the microbe itself. There is both clinical and experimental evidence supporting the concept that strictly anaerobic bacteria do not readily translocate. Bacteria that are able to survive within macrophages (e.g., Salmonella species and Listeria monocytogenes) translocate easier than others, and there is recent experimental evidence that normal intestinal bacteria may translocate to the draining mesenteric lymph node within host phagocytes. There is also evidence that anaerobic bacteria translocate along with facultative species in situations associated with intestinal epithelial damage, i.e., burn trauma, oral ricinoleic acid, and acute mesenteric ischemia. In contrast, recent experimental evidence demonstrates that facultative bacteria can translocate across a histologically intact intestinal epithelium, and that the ileal absorptive cell may be at least one portal of entry prior to transport into deeper tissues. It is anticipated that further clarification of the routes and mechanisms involved in bacterial translocation will provide new insights into the treatment and prevention of a significant proportion of the infectious morbidity seen in severely ill, hospitalized patients. Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Lecture presented at the Annual Meeting of the Netherlands Society of Microbiology, Utrecht, 23 November, 1989.