Polymorphisms in the human AH receptor

The AH receptor (AHR) mediates toxicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) as well as induction of three cytochrome P450 enzymes and certain Phase II enzymes. In laboratory animals, genetic variations in the AHR lead to substantial differences in sensitivity to biochemical and toxic effects of TCDD and related compounds. Relatively few polymorphisms have been discovered in the human AHR gene; these occur predominantly in exon 10, a region that encodes a major portion of the transactivation domain of the receptor that is responsible for regulating expression of other genes. In human populations there is a wide range of variation in responses regulated by the AHR for example, induction of CYP1A1. Some variation in human responsiveness likely is due to genetically based variations in AHR structure. Thus far, however, only one pair of polymorphisms, those at codons 517 and 570, has been shown to have a clear cut and strong effect on the phenotype of an AHR-mediated response. The search continues for polymorphisms that alter AHR function because this receptor is a central factor in determining responses to important environmental contaminants and also plays a physiologic role in early development in mammals.     

Co-planar 3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorinated biphenyl and non-co-planar 2,2',4,6,6'-pentachlorinated biphenyl differentially induce recruitment of oestrogen receptor alpha to aryl hydrocarbon receptor target genes

In the present study we examined the ability of 3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorinated biphenyl [PCB126 (polychlorinated biphenyl 126)], a prototypical AHR (aryl hydrocarbon receptor) agonist, and 2,2',4,6,6'-PCB (PCB104), which does not activate AHR, to induce the recruitment of ERalpha (oestrogen receptor alpha) to CYP1A1 (cytochrome P4501A1 gene) and CYP1B1 promoters in T-47D human breast cancer cells and other cell lines. PCB126 treatment strongly induced CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 mRNA expression that was unaffected by co-treatment with E2 (17beta-oestradiol). PCB104 failed to induce changes in either CYP1A1 or CYP1B1 expression levels. ChIP (chromatin immunoprecipitation) assays show that PCB126, but not PCB104, increased the promoter occupancy by ERalpha to CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 promoters. Co-treatment with PCB126+E2 significantly enhanced the promoter occupancy of ERalpha at CYP1A1, whereas co-treatment with PCB126+4-hydroxytamoxifen or ICI182,780 did not. Competitive binding studies revealed that neither PCB126 nor PCB104 bound to ERalpha. HEK-293 cells (human embryonic kidney-293 cells) stably transfected with ERalpha showed significantly higher PCB126-induced CYP1A1 expression compared with empty vector controls, whereas no increase was observed in cells stably transfected with ERalpha lacking its N-terminal AF1 (activation function-1) domain (ERalphaDeltaAF1). Despite no increase in AHR-mediated gene expression, ChIP assays revealed that ERalphaDeltaAF1 was present at CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 promoters. HC11 mouse mammary cells stably expressing shRNA (small-hairpin RNA) against ERalpha showed an 8-fold reduction in PCB126-dependent Cyp1a1 expression. Our results provide further evidence that AHR agonists induce ERalpha promoter occupancy at AHR target genes through indirect activation of ERalpha, and support a role for ERalpha in AHR transactivation.     

Antagonistic functions of SET-2/SET1 and HPL/HP1 proteins in C. elegans development

Cellular identity during metazoan development is maintained by epigenetic modifications of chromatin structure brought about by the activity of specific proteins which mediate histone variant incorporation, histone modifications, and nucleosome remodeling. HP1 proteins directly influence gene expression by modifying chromatin structure. We previously showed that the Caenorhabditis elegans HP1 proteins HPL-1 and HPL-2 are required for several aspects of post-embryonic development. To gain insight into how HPL proteins influence gene expression in a developmental context, we carried out a candidate RNAi screen to identify suppressors of hpl-1 and hpl-2 phenotypes. We identified SET-2, the homologue of yeast and mammalian SET1, as an antagonist of HPL-1 and HPL-2 activity in growth and somatic gonad development. Yeast Set1 and its mammalian counterparts SET1/MLL are H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) histone methyltransferases associated with gene activation as part of large multisubunit complexes. We show that the nematode counterparts of SET1/MLL complex subunits also antagonize HPL function in post-embryonic development. Genetic analysis is consistent with SET1/MLL complex subunits having both shared and unique functions in development. Furthermore, as observed in other species, we find that SET1/MLL complex homologues differentially affect global H3K4 methylation. Our results suggest that HP1 and a SET1/MLL-related complex may play antagonistic roles in the epigenetic regulation of specific developmental programs.     

Is CYP1B1 involved in the metabolism of dioxins in the pig?

2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is the most difficult to biodegradate and the most toxic dioxin congener. Previously, we demonstrated in silico the ability of pig CYP1A1 to hydroxylate 2,7-dichlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (DiCDD), but not TCDD. To increase our knowledge concerning the low effectiveness of TCDD biodegradability, we analyzed in silico the binding selectivity and affinity between pig CYP1B1 and the two dioxins by means of molecular modeling. We also compared the effects of TCDD and DiCDD on CYP1B1 gene expression (qRT-PCR) and catalytic (EROD) activity in porcine granulosa cells. It was found that DiCDD and TCDD were stabilized within the pig CYP1B1 active site by hydrophobic interactions. The analysis of substrate channel availability revealed that both dioxins opened the exit channel S, allowing metabolites to leave the enzyme active site. Moreover, DiCDD and TCDD increased the CYP1B1 gene expression and catalytic activity in porcine granulosa cells. On the other hand, TCDD demonstrated higher than DiCDD calculated affinity to pig CYP1B1, hindering TCDD exit from the active site. The great distance between CYP1B1's heme and TCDD also might contribute to the lower hydroxylation effectiveness of TCDD compared to that of DiCDD. Moreover, the narrow active site of pig CYP1B1 may immobilize TCDD molecule, inhibiting its hydroxylation. The results of the access channel analysis and the distance from pig CYP1B1's heme to TCDD suggest that the metabolizing potential of pig CYP1B1 is higher than that of pig CYP1A1. However, this potential is probably not sufficiently high to considerably improve the slow TCDD biodegradation.