Domain III function of Mu transposase analysed by directed placement of subunits within the transpososome

Assembly of the functional tetrameric form of Mu transposase (MuA protein) at the two att ends of Mu depends on interaction of MuA with multiple att and enhancer sites on supercoiled DNA, and is stimulated by MuB protein. The N-terminal domain I of MuA harbours distinct regions for interaction with the att ends and enhancer; the C-terminal domain III contains separate regions essential for tetramer assembly and interaction with MuB protein (IIIα and IIIβ, respectively). Although the central domain II (the ‘DDE’ domain) of MuA harbours the known catalytic DDE residues, a 26 amino acid peptide within IIIα also has a non-specific DNA binding and nuclease activity which has been implicated in catalysis. One model proposes that active sites for Mu transposition are assembled by sharing structural/catalytic residues between domains II and III present on separate MuA monomers within the MuA tetramer. We have used substrates with altered att sites and mixtures of MuA proteins with either wild-type or altered att DNA binding specificities, to create tetrameric arrangements wherein specific MuA subunits are nonfunctional in II, IIIα or IIIβ domains. From the ability of these oriented tetramers to carry out DNA cleavage and strand transfer we conclude that domain IIIα or IIIβ function is not unique to a specific subunit within the tetramer, indicative of a structural rather than a catalytic function for domain III in Mu transposition.     

Interactions of phage Mu enhancer and termini that specify the assembly of a topologically unique interwrapped transpososome

The higher-order DNA-protein complex that carries out the chemical steps of phage Mu transposition is organized by bridging interactions among three DNA sites, the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu, and an enhancer element (E), mediated by the transposase protein MuA. A subset of the six subunits of MuA associated with their cognate sub-sites at L and R communicate with the enhancer to trigger the stepwise assembly of the functional transpososome. The DNA follows a well-defined path within the transpososome, trapping five supercoil nodes comprising two E-R crossings, one E-L crossing and two L-R crossings. The enhancer is a critical DNA element in specifying the unique interwrapped topology of the three-site LER synapse. In this study, we used multiple strategies to characterize Mu end-enhancer interactions to extend, modify and refine those inferred from earlier analyses. Directed placement of transposase subunits at their cognate sub-sites at L and R, analysis of the protein composition of transpososomes thus obtained, and their characterization using topological methods define the following interactions. R1-E interaction is essential to promote transpososome assembly, R3-E interaction contributes to the native topology of the transpososome, and L1-E and R2-E interactions are not required for assembly. The data on L2-E and L3-E interactions are not unequivocal. If they do occur, either one is sufficient to support the assembly process. Our results are consistent with two R-E and perhaps one L-E, being responsible for the three DNA crossings between the enhancer and the left and right ends of Mu. A 3D representation of the interwrapped complex (IW) obtained by modeling is consistent with these results. The model reveals straightforward geometric and topological relationships between the IW complex and a more relaxed enhancer-independent V-form of the transpososome assembled under altered reaction conditions.     

Altering the DNA-binding specificity of Mu transposase in vitro.

We describe the isolation of a variant of Mu transposase (MuA protein) which can recognize altered att sites at the ends of Mu DNA. No prior knowledge of the structure of the DNA binding domain or its mode of interaction with att DNA was necessary to obtain this variant. Protein secondary structure programs initially helped target mutations to predicted helical regions within a subdomain of MuA demonstrated to harbor att DNA binding activity. Of the 54 mutant positions examined, only two showed decreased affinity for att DNA, while eight others affected assembly of the Mu transpososome. A variant impaired in DNA binding [MuA(R146V)], and predicted to be in the recognition helix of an HTH motif, was challenged with altered att sites created from degenerate oligonucleotides to select for novel DNA binding specificity. DNA sequences bound to MuA(R146V) were detected by gel-retardation, and following several steps of PCR amplification/enrichment, were identified by cloning and sequencing. The strategy allowed recovery of an altered att site for which MuA(R146V) showed higher affinity than for the wild-type site, although this site was bound by wild-type MuA as well. The altered association between MuA(R146V) and an altered att site target was competent in transposition. We discuss the strengths and limitations of this methodology, which has applications in dissecting the functional role of specific protein-DNA associations.     

Conformational isomerization in phage Mu transpososome assembly: effects of the transpositional enhancer and of MuB.

Initiation of phage Mu DNA transposition requires assembly of higher order protein-DNA complexes called Mu transpososomes containing the two Mu DNA ends and MuA transposase tetramer. Mu transpososome assembly is highly regulated and involves multiple DNA sites for transposase binding, including a transpositional enhancer called the internal activation sequence (IAS). In addition, a number of protein cofactors participate, including the target DNA activator MuB ATPase. We investigated the impact of the assembly cofactors on the kinetics of transpososome assembly with the aim of deciphering the reaction steps that are influenced by the cofactors. The transpositional enhancer IAS appears to have little impact on the initial pairing of the two Mu end segments bound by MuA. Instead, it accelerates the post-synaptic conformational step(s) that converts the reversible complex to the stable transpososome. The transpososome assembly stimulation by MuB does not require its stable DNA binding activity, which appears critical for directing transposition to sites distant from the donor transposon.     

Mutational analysis of the att DNA-binding domain of phage Mu transposase.

The transposase (A protein) of phage Mu encodes binding to two families of DNA sites, att sites located at the Mu ends and enhancer sites located internally. Separate subdomains in the N-terminal domain I of Mu A protein are known to be involved in recognition of the att and enhancer sites. We have delineated an approximately 135 aa region within domain I beta gamma that specifies binding to Mu att sites. This peptide was overexpressed and its properties compared with that of the larger domain I beta gamma as well as the intact Mu A protein. Extensive mutagenesis of residues around a putative helix-turn-helix DNA-binding motif within the I beta domain identified several mutants defective in DNA transposition in vivo. Of these, Mu A(K157Q) was completely defective in att DNA-binding. Mu A(F131S) and Mu A(R146N) had a lower affinity for att DNA and low levels of transposition in vitro. Our results indicate that residues in the gamma region are required for activity and that residues outside the beta gamma region must also influence discrimination between the multiple att sites.     

DNA-protein complexes during attachment-site synapsis in Mu DNA transposition.

Initial events in Mu DNA transposition involve specific recognition of Mu DNA ends (att sites) and an internal enhancer site by the Mu transposase (A protein). This interaction between A protein and Mu DNA sequences present on a supercoiled DNA substrate leads to the formation of a stable synaptic complex in which the att ends are nicked, prior to DNA strand transfer. This study examines the properties of a synaptic complex proficient for DNA transposition. We show that the A protein binds as a monomer to its binding sites, and causes the DNA to bend through approximately 90 degrees at each site. All six att binding sites (three at each Mu end) are occupied by A within the synaptic complex. Three of these sites are loosely held and can be emptied of A upon challenge with heparin. A synaptic complex with only three sites occupied is stable and is fully competent in the subsequent strand-transfer step of transposition.     

The Mu enhancer is functionally asymmetric both in cis and in trans. Topological selectivity of Mu transposition is enhancer-independent

Mu DNA transposition from a negatively supercoiled DNA substrate requires interaction of an enhancer element with the left (attL) and right (attR) ends of Mu. The orientation of the L and R ends with respect to each other (inverted) and with respect to the enhancer is normally inviolate. We show that when the enhancer is provided in trans as a linear fragment, the head to head orientation of the L/R ends is still required. Each functional half of the linear enhancer maintains the same "cross-wise" interaction with the subsites L1 and R1, when present in cis or in trans. In reactions catalyzed by an enhancer-independent variant of the Mu transposase, the need for negative supercoiling of the substrate and the inverted orientation of L and R ends is not relaxed. These results show that the orientation specificity of the enhancer is not determined by its topological linkage to the Mu ends. There is a functional asymmetry inherent to the enhancer. Furthermore, the enhancer does not directly impose topological constraints on the transposition reaction or specify the reactive orientation of the Mu ends.     

Path of DNA within the Mu transpososome. Transposase interactions bridging two Mu ends and the enhancer trap five DNA supercoils

The phage Mu transpososome is assembled by interactions of transposase subunits with the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu and an enhancer (E) located in between. A metastable three-site complex LER progresses into a more stable type 0 complex in which a tetrameric transposase is poised for DNA cleavage. "Difference topology" has revealed five trapped negative supercoils within type 0, three contributed by crossings of E with L and R, and two by crossings of L with R. This is the most complex DNA arrangement seen to date within a recombination synapse. Contrary to the prevailing notion, the enhancer appears not to be released immediately following type 0 assembly. Difference topology provides a simple method for determining the ordered sequestration of DNA segments within nucleoprotein assemblies.     

The bacteriophage Mu transposase protein can form high-affinity protein-DNA complexes with the ends of transposable elements of the Tn 3 family

The 37 kb transposable bacteriophage Mu genome encodes a transposase protein which can recognize and bind to a consensus sequence repeated three times at each extremity of its genome. A subset of this consensus sequence (5'-PuCGAAA(A)-3') is found in the ends of many class II prokaryotic transposable elements. These elements, like phage Mu, cause 5 bp duplications at the site of element insertion, and transpose by a cointegrate mechanism. Using the band retardation assay, we have found that crude protein extracts containing overexpressed Mu transposase can form high-affinity protein-DNA complexes with Mu att R and the ends of the class II elements Tn 3 (right) and IS101. No significant protein-DNA complex formation was observed with DNA fragments containing the right end of the element IS102, or a non-specific pBR322 fragment of similar size. These results suggest that the Mu transposase protein can specifically recognize the ends of other class II transposable elements and that these elements may be evolutionarily related.     

The Mu transposase interwraps distant DNA sites within a functional transpososome in the absence of DNA supercoiling

A Mu transpososome assembled on negatively supercoiled DNA traps five supercoils by intertwining the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu with an enhancer element (E). To investigate the contribution of DNA supercoiling to this elaborate synapse in which E and L cross once, E and R twice, and L and R twice, we have analyzed DNA crossings in a transpososome assembled on nicked substrates under conditions that bypass the supercoiling requirement for transposition. We find that the transposase MuA can recreate an essentially similar topology on nicked substrates, interwrapping both E-R and L-R twice but being unable to generate the single E-L crossing. In addition, we deduce that the functional MuA tetramer must contribute to three of the four observed crossings and, thus, to restraining the enhancer within the complex. We discuss the contribution of both MuA and DNA supercoiling to the 5-noded Mu synapse built at the 3-way junction.     

The Mu three-site synapse: a strained assembly platform in which delivery of the L1 transposase binding site triggers catalytic commitment

The Mu DNA transposition reaction proceeds through a three-site synaptic complex (LER), including the two Mu ends and the transpositional enhancer. We show that the LER contains highly stressed DNA regions in the enhancer and in the L1 transposase binding site. We propose that the L1 site acts as the keystone for assembly of a catalytically competent transpososome. Delivery of L1 through HU-mediated bending completes LER assembly, provides the trigger for necessary conformational transitions in transpososome formation, and allows target capture to occur. Relief of the stress at L1 and the enhancer may help drive Mu A tetramerization and engagement of the Mu ends by the transposase active site.     

A domain sharing model for active site assembly within the Mu A tetramer during transposition: the enhancer may specify domain contributions.

The functional configuration of Mu transposase (A protein) is its tetrameric form. We present here a model for the organization of a functional Mu A tetramer. Within the tetramer, assembly of each of the two active sites for Mu end cleavage requires amino acid contributions from the central and C-terminal domains (domains II and III respectively) of at least two Mu A monomers in a trans configuration. The Mu enhancer is likely to function in this assembly process by specifying the two monomers that provide their C-terminal domains for strand cleavage. The Mu B protein is not required in this step. Each of the two active sites for the strand transfer reaction is also organized by domain sharing (but in the reverse mode) between Mu A monomers; i.e. a donor of domain II (also the recipient of domain III) during cleavage is a recipient of domain II (and the donor of domain III) during strand transfer. The function of the Mu B protein (which is required at the strand transfer step) and that of the enhancer element may be analogous in that their interactions with Mu A (domain III and domain I alpha respectively) promote conformations of Mu A conducive to strand cleavage or strand transfer.     

Transposase contacts with mu DNA ends.

We have investigated the interaction between phage Mu transposase (A protein) and the ends (att sites) of Mu by chemical and nuclease protection and interference studies. These studies define a 24-base pair contact region at five of the six att sites (L1, L3 at att L and R1, R2, R3 at att R). Hydroxyl radical footprints show that the transposase binds to one face of the DNA helix and covers two consecutive major grooves. Binding specificity is achieved primarily through the major groove. Strong contacts are found with 3 guanines which are conserved at five of the sites. Two of these guanines are missing in the weakest binding site (L2) where 13 base pairs are mainly contacted. A pair of DNAase I hypersensitive sites, one on each strand, appear at the back of only one of the two contacted major grooves at most sites except at L2, and can be correlated with the degree of A protein-induced bend (Kuo, C.-F., Zou, A., Jayaram, M., Getzoff, E. D., and Harshey, R. M. (1991) EMBO J. 10, 1585-1591) at these sites. No contacts are observed for 4-5 base pairs in the vicinity of L1 and R1, where the A protein nicks DNA during transposition.     

A unique right end-enhancer complex precedes synapsis of Mu ends: the enhancer is sequestered within the transpososome throughout transposition

Assembly of the Mu transpososome is dependent on interactions of transposase subunits with the left (L) and right (R) ends of Mu and an enhancer (E). We have followed the order and dynamics of association of these sites within a series of transpososomes prior to and during formation of a three-site complex (LER), engagement of Mu ends by the transposase active site (type 0 complex), cleavage of the ends (type I complex) and their transfer to target DNA (type II complex). LER appears to be preceded by a two-site complex (ER) where E and R are interwrapped twice, as in the mature transpososome. At each stage thereafter, the overall topology of five DNA supercoils is retained: two between E and R, one between E and L and two between L and R. However, L-R interactions within LER appear to be flexible. Unexpectedly, the enhancer was seen to persist within the transpososome through cleavage and strand transfer of Mu ends to target DNA.     

Role of the A protein-binding sites in the in vitro transposition of mu DNA. A complex circuit of interactions involving the mu ends and the transpositional enhancer.

To investigate the role of the A protein-binding sites at the Mu ends in the DNA strand transfer reaction, we constructed mutant mini-Mu molecules in which these sites were deleted (L3 or R3) or substituted (L2 or R2) to conserve the spacing arrangements at the adjacent sites. The single site mutants are poor substrates for phosphodiester bond hydrolysis at the Mu ends in Type 1 reactions in the absence of Escherichia coli integration host factor (IHF). Addition of IHF to the reaction stimulates Type 1 cleavage more than 10 times for the delta-R3, delta-L3, S-L2 mutants and more than five times in the case of the S-R2 mutant under alternate conditions. The site of IHF stimulation resides within the transpositional enhancer which implicates the end-binding sites L2, L3, R2, and R3 in interactions with the enhancer. At least two of the L2, L3, and R3 sites are required for proficient reaction in the presence of IHF. By combining the single site mutants with O1 or O2 partially deleted enhancer elements, we have tentatively localized some of the interactions to each side of the functional enhancer revealing a complex circuit of end-enhancer interactions. The R3 site is suggested to be involved in interactions only with O2 and the L3 site only with O1. The data also suggest the possibility that L2 and R2 may be involved in interactions with both O1 and O2. Finally, our working model predicts that the L3-O1 and R3-O2 interactions may be required contacts for discriminating between the Mu left and right ends in transpososome formation.     

Involvement of a bifunctional,paired-like DNA-binding domain and a transpositional enhancer in Sleeping Beauty transposition

Sleeping Beauty (SB) is the most active Tc1/mariner-like transposon in vertebrate species. Each of the terminal inverted repeats (IRs) of SB contains two transposase-binding sites (DRs). This feature, termed the IR/DR structure, is conserved in a group of Tc1-like transposons. The DNA-binding region of SB transposase, similar to the paired domain of Pax proteins, consists of two helix-turn-helix subdomains (PAI + RED = PAIRED). The N-terminal PAI subdomain was found to play a dominant role in contacting the DRs. Transposase was able to bind to mutant sites retaining the 3' part of the DRs; thus, primary DNA binding is not sufficient to determine the specificity of the transposition reaction. The PAI subdomain was also found to bind to a transpositional enhancer-like sequence within the left IR of SB, and to mediate protein-protein interactions between transposase subunits. A tetrameric form of the transposase was detected in solution, consistent with an interaction between the IR/DR structure and a transposase tetramer. We propose a model in which the transpositional enhancer and the PAI subdomain stabilize complexes formed by a transposase tetramer bound at the IR/DR. These interactions may result in enhanced stability of synaptic complexes, which might explain the efficient transposition of Sleeping Beauty in vertebrate cells.     

A novel DNA binding and nuclease activity in domain III of Mu transposase: evidence for a catalytic region involved in donor cleavage.

The Mu A protein is a 75 kDa transposase organized into three structural domains. By severing the C-terminal region (domain III) from the remainder of the protein, we unmasked a novel non-specific DNA binding and nuclease activity in this region. Deletion analysis localized both activities to a 26 amino acid stretch (aa 575-600) which remarkably remained active in DNA binding and cleavage. The two activities were shown to be tightly linked by site-directed mutagenesis. To study the importance of these activities in the transposition process, an intact mutant transposase lacking the DNA binding and nuclease activity of domain III was constructed and purified. The mutant transposase was indistinguishable from wild-type Mu A in binding affinity for both the Mu ends and the enhancer, and in strand transfer activity when the cleavage step was bypassed. In contrast, the mutant transposase displayed defects in both synapsis and donor cleavage. Our results strongly suggest that the 26 amino acid region in domain III carries catalytic residues required for donor DNA cleavage by Mu A protein. Furthermore, our data suggest that an active site for donor cleavage activity in the Mu tetramer is assembled from domain II (metal ion binding) in one A monomer and domain III (DNA cleavage) in a separate A monomer. This proposal for active site assembly is in agreement with the recently proposed domain sharing model by Yang et al. (Yang, J.Y., Kim, K., Jayaram, M. and Harshey, R.M. [1995] EMBO J., 14, 2374-2384).     

(+)-CC-1065 as a structural probe of Mu transposase-induced bending of DNA: overcoming limitations of hydroxyl-radical footprinting.

Phage Mu transposase (A-protein) is primarily responsible for transposition of the Mu genome. The protein binds to six att sites, three at each end of Mu DNA. At most att sites interaction of a protein monomer with DNA is seen to occur over three minor and two consecutive major grooves and to result in bending up to about 90 degrees. To probe the directionality and locus of these A-protein-induced bends, we have used the antitumor antibiotic (+)-CC-1065 as a structural probe. As a consequence of binding within the minor groove, (+)-CC-1065 is able to alkylate N3 of adenine in a sequence selective manner. This selectivity is partially determined by conformational flexibility of the DNA sequence, and the covalent adduct has a bent DNA structure in which narrowing of the minor groove has occurred. Using this drug in experiments in which either gel retardation or DNA strand breakage are used to monitor the stability of the A-protein--DNA complex or the (+)-CC-1065 alkylation sites on DNA (att site L3), we have demonstrated that of the three minor grooves implicated in the interaction with A-protein, the peripheral two are 'open' or accessible to drug bonding following protein binding. These drug-bonding sites very likely represent binding at at least two A-protein-induced bending sites. Significantly, the locus of bending at these sites is spaced approximately two helical turns apart, and the bending is proposed to occur by narrowing of the minor groove of DNA. The intervening minor groove between these two peripheral sites is protected from (+)-CC-1065 alkylation. The results are discussed in reference to a proposed model for overall DNA bending in the A-protein att L3 site complex. This study illustrates the utility of (+)-CC-1065 as a probe for protein-induced bending of DNA, as well as for interactions of minor groove DNA bending proteins with DNA which may be masked in hydroxyl radical footprinting experiments.     

Assembly of the active form of the transposase-Mu DNA complex: a critical control point in Mu transposition.

Discovery and characterization of a new intermediate in Mu DNA transposition allowed assembly of the transposition machinery to be separated from the chemical steps of recombination. This stable intermediate, which accumulates in the presence of Ca2+, consists of the two ends of the Mu DNA synapsed by a tetramer of the Mu transposase. Within this stable synaptic complex (SSC), the recombination sites are engaged but not yet cleaved. Thus, the SSC is structurally related to both the cleaved donor and strand transfer complexes, but precedes them on the transposition pathway. Once the active protein-DNA complex is constructed, it is conserved throughout transposition. The participation of internal sequence elements and accessory factors exclusively during SSC assembly allows recombination to be controlled prior to the irreversible chemical steps.