Choreography of recombination proteins during the DNA damage response

Genome integrity is frequently challenged by DNA lesions from both endogenous and exogenous sources. A single DNA double-strand break (DSB) is lethal if unrepaired and may lead to loss of heterozygosity, mutations, deletions, genomic rearrangements and chromosome loss if repaired improperly. Such genetic alterations are the main causes of cancer and other genetic diseases. Consequently, DNA double-strand break repair (DSBR) is an important process in all living organisms. DSBR is also the driving mechanism in most strategies of gene targeting, which has applications in both genetic and clinical research. Here we review the cell biological response to DSBs in mitotically growing cells with an emphasis on homologous recombination pathways in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and in mammalian cells.     

DNA damage checkpoint and repair centers

In eukaryotes, recombinational repair is choreographed by multiprotein complexes that are organized into focal assemblies. These foci are highly dynamic giga-dalton structures capable of simultaneously repairing multiple DNA lesions. Moreover, the composition of these repair centers depends on the nature of the DNA lesion and is tightly coordinated with progression of the cell cycle. Components of DNA repair centers are regulated by post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, ubiquitination and sumoylation. Repair foci progress through four distinct stages: first, DNA damage recognition and binding of DNA ends by the Mre11 complex and Ku70/80; second, end-processing and binding of single-stranded DNA by replication protein A, which recruits checkpoint proteins; third, recombinational repair during S and G(2) phase; and fourth, disassembly of foci and resumption of the cell cycle.     

Centrosomal localization of DNA damage checkpoint proteins

During mitosis, the phosphatidylinositol-3 (PI-3) family-related DNA damage checkpoint kinases ATM and ATR were found on the centrosomes of human cells. ATRIP, an interaction partner of ATR, as well as Chk1 and Chk2, the downstream targets of ATR or ATM, were also localized to the centrosomes. Surprisingly, the DNA-PK inhibitor vanillin enhanced the level of ATM on centrosomes. Accordingly, DNA-PKcs, the catalytic subunit of DNA-PK, was also found on the centrosomes. Vanillin altered the phosphorylation of Chk2 in the centrosomes and in whole cell extracts. Nucleoplasmic ATM co-immunoprecipitated with Ku70/86, the DNA binding subunits of DNA-PK, while vanillin diminished this association. Vanillin did not affect microtubule polymerization at the centrosomes but, surprisingly, caused a transient enhancement of alpha-tubulin foci in the nucleus. Interestingly, gamma-tubulin was also present in the nucleus and co-immunoprecipitated with ATR or BRCA1. DNA damage led to a reduction of the mentioned checkpoint proteins on the centrosomes but increased the level of gamma-tubulin at this organelle. Taken together, these results indicate that DNA damage checkpoint proteins may control the formation of gamma-tubulin and/or the kinetics of microtubule formation at the centrosomes, and thereby couple them to the DNA damage response.     

Nuclear reorganization of DNA mismatch repair proteins in response to DNA damage

The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system is highly conserved and vital for preserving genomic integrity. Current mechanistic models for MMR are mainly derived from in vitro assays including reconstitution of strand-specific MMR and DNA binding assays using short oligonucleotides. However, fundamental questions regarding the mechanism and regulation in the context of cellular DNA replication remain. Using synchronized populations of HeLa cells we demonstrated that hMSH2, hMLH1 and PCNA localize to the chromatin during S-phase, and accumulate to a greater extent in cells treated with a DNA alkylating agent. In addition, using small interfering RNA to deplete hMSH2, we demonstrated that hMLH1 localization to the chromatin is hMSH2-dependent. hMSH2/hMLH1/PCNA proteins, when associated with the chromatin, form a complex that is greatly enhanced by DNA damage. The DNA damage caused by high doses of alkylating agents leads to a G₂ arrest after only one round of replication. In these G₂-arrested cells, an hMSH2/hMLH1 complex persists on chromatin, however, PCNA is no longer in the complex. Cells treated with a lower dose of alkylating agent require two rounds of replication before cells arrest in G₂. In the first S-phase, the MMR proteins form a complex with PCNA, however, during the second S-phase PCNA is missing from that complex. The distinction between these complexes may suggest separate functions for the MMR proteins in damage repair and signaling. Additionally, using confocal immunofluorescence, we observed a population of hMSH6 that localized to the nucleolus. This population is significantly reduced after DNA damage suggesting that the protein is shuttled out of the nucleolus in response to damage. In contrast, hMLH1 is excluded from the nucleolus at all times. Thus, the nucleolus may act to segregate a population of hMSH2–hMSH6 from hMLH1–hPMS2 such that, in the absence of DNA damage, an inappropriate response is not invoked.     

Human DNA damage response and repair deficiency syndromes: Linking genomic instability and cell cycle checkpoint proficiency

A plethora of clinically distinct human disorders exist whose underlying cause is a defect in the response to or repair of DNA damage. The clinical spectrum of these conditions provides evidence for the role of the DNA damage response (DDR) in mediating diverse processes such as genomic stability, immune system function and normal human development. Cell lines from these disorders provide a valuable resource to help dissect the consequences of compromised DDR at the molecular level. Here we will discuss some well known, less well known and ‘novel’ DDR defective disorders with particular reference to the functional interplay between the DNA damage response and cell cycle checkpoints. We will describe recent advances in further delineating the genetic basis of Seckel syndrome and microcephalic osteodysplastic primordial dwarfism type II, which have shed more light on the interplay between the DDR, cycle progression and centrosomes. We will also overview recent developments concerning haploinsufficiency of DDR components and their association with certain genomic disorders such as Miller–Dieker lissencephaly syndrome and Williams–Beuren syndrome. Finally, we will discuss how defects in the DDR result in some unexpected clinical features before describing how the nature of a DDR defect impacts on the management and treatment of individuals with these conditions.     

MCM proteins: DNA damage, mutagenesis and repair

The MCM2-7 complex, which may act as a replicative helicase during DNA synthesis, plays a central role in S-phase genome stability. MCM proteins are required for processive DNA replication and are a target of S-phase checkpoints. Loss of MCM function causes DNA damage and genome instability. MCM expression is upregulated in proliferating cells, providing a diagnostic marker for both cancerous cells and cells with the potential to become malignant. The role of the MCM complex in genome integrity reflects its activity both at active replication forks and away from forks.     

Impaired DNA damage checkpoint response in MIF-deficient mice

Recent studies demonstrated that proinflammatory migration inhibitory factor(MIF) blocks p53-dependent apoptosis and interferes with the tumor suppressor activity of p53. To explore the mechanism underlying this MIF-p53 relationship, we studied spontaneous tumorigenesis in genetically matched p53-/- and MIF-/-p53-/- mice. We show that the loss of MIF expression aggravates the tumor-prone phenotype of p53-/- mice and predisposes them to a broader tumor spectrum, including B-cell lymphomas and carcinomas. Impaired DNA damage response is at the root of tumor predisposition of MIF-/-p53-/- mice. We provide evidence that MIF plays a role in regulating the activity of Cul1-containing SCF ubiquitin ligases. The loss of MIF expression uncouples Chk1/Chk2-responsive DNA damage checkpoints from SCF-dependent degradation of key cell-cycle regulators such as Cdc25A, E2F1 and DP1, creating conditions for the genetic instability of cells. These MIF effects depend on its association with the Jab1/CSN5 subunit of the COP9/CSN signalosome. Given that CSN plays a central role in the assembly of SCF complexes in vivo, regulation of Jab1/CSN5 by MIF is required to sustain optimal composition and function of the SCF complex.     

Drosophila melanogaster: a model for the study of DNA damage checkpoint response

The cells of metazoans respond to DNA damage by either arresting their cell cycle in order to repair the DNA, or by undergoing apoptosis. This response is highly conserved across species, and many of the genes involved in this DNA damage response have been shown to be inactivated in human cancers. This suggests the importance of DNA damage response with regard to the prevention of cancer. The DNA damage checkpoint responses vary greatly depending on the developmental context, cell type, gene expression profile, and the degree and nature of the DNA lesions. More valuable information can be obtained from studies utilizing whole organisms in which the molecular basis of development has been well established, such as Drosophila. Since the discovery of the Drosophila p53 orthologue, various aspects of DNA damage responses have been studied in Drosophila. In this review, I will summarize the current knowledge on the DNA damage checkpoint response in Drosophila. With the ease of genetic, cellular, and cytological approaches, Drosophila will become an increasingly valuable model organism for the study of mechanisms inherent to cancer formation associated with defects in the DNA damage pathway.     

DNA-dependent protein kinase complex: a multifunctional protein in DNA repair and damage checkpoint

DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) is a nuclear serine/threonine protein kinase that is activated upon DNA damage generated by ionizing radiation or UV-irradiation. It is a three-protein complex consisting of a 470-kDa catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs) and the regulatory DNA binding subunits, Ku heterodimer (Ku70 and Ku80). Mouse and human cells deficient in DNA-PKcs are hypersensitive to ionizing radiation and defective in V(D)J recombination, suggesting a role for the kinase in double-strand break repair and recombination. The Ku heterodimer binds to double-strand DNA breaks produced by either DNA damage or recombination, protects DNA ends from degradation, orients DNA ends for re-ligation, and recruits its catalytic subunit and additional factors necessary for successful end-joining. DNA-PK is also involved in an early stage of damage-induced cell cycle arrest, however, it remains unclear how the enzyme senses DNA damage and transmits signals to downstream gene(s) and proteins.     

MAD2 interacts with DNA repair proteins and negatively regulates DNA damage repair

MAD2 (mitotic arrest deficient 2) is a key regulator of mitosis. Recently, it had been suggested that MAD2-induced mitotic arrest mediates DNA damage response and that upregulation of MAD2 confers sensitivity to DNA-damaging anticancer drug-induced apoptosis. In this study, we report a potential novel role of MAD2 in mediating DNA nucleotide excision repair through physical interactions with two DNA repair proteins, XPD (xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group D) and ERCC1. First, overexpression of MAD2 resulted in decreased nuclear accumulation of XPD, a crucial step in the initiation of DNA repair. Second, immunoprecipitation experiments showed that MAD2 was able to bind to XPD, which led to competitive suppression of binding activity between XPD and XPA, resulting in the prevention of physical interactions between DNA repair proteins. Third, unlike its role in mitosis, the N-terminus domain seemed to be more important in the binding activity between MAD2 and XPD. Fourth, phosphorylation of H2AX, a process that is important for recruitment of DNA repair factors to DNA double-strand breaks, was suppressed in MAD2-overexpressing cells in response to DNA damage. These results suggest a negative role of MAD2 in DNA damage response, which may be accounted for its previously reported role in promoting sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents in cancer cells. However, the interaction between MAD2 and ERCC1 did not show any effect on the binding activity between ERCC1 and XPA in the presence or absence of DNA damage. Our results suggest a novel function of MAD2 by interfering with DNA repair proteins.     

Modulation of ATR-mediated DNA damage checkpoint response by cryptochrome 1

Mammalian cryptochromes (Crys) are essential circadian clock factors implicated in diverse clock-independent physiological functions, including DNA damage responses. Here we show that Cry1 modulates the ATR-mediated DNA damage checkpoint (DDC) response by interacting with Timeless (Tim) in a time-of-day-dependent manner. The DDC capacity in response to UV irradiation showed a circadian rhythm. Interestingly, clock-deficient Cry1 and Cry2 double knockout (Cry^DKO) cells retained substantial DDC capacity compared with clock-proficient wild-type cells, although the Cry1-modulated oscillation of the DDC capacity was abolished in Cry^DKO cells. We found temporal interaction of Cry1 and Tim in the nucleus. When Cry1 was expressed in the nucleus, it was critical for circadian ATR activity. We regenerated rhythmic DDC responses by ectopically expressing Cry1 in Cry^DKO cells. In addition, we also investigated the DDC capacity in the liver of mice that were intraperitoneally injected with cisplatin at different circadian times (CT). When mice were injected at CT20, about 2-fold higher expression of phosphorylated minichromosome maintenance protein 2 (p-MCM2) was detected compared with mice injected at CT08, which consequently affected the removal rate of cisplatin-DNA adducts from genomic DNA. Taken together, our data demonstrate the intimate interaction between the circadian clock and the DDC system during genotoxic stress in clock-ticking cells.