Both the <Emphasis Type="Italic">AOX1</Emphasis> promoter and the <Emphasis Type="Italic">FLD1</Emphasis> promoter work together in a <Emphasis Type="Italic">Pichia pastoris</Emphasis> expression vector

We constructed a Pichia pastoris expression vector with two strongly inducible promoters (an alcohol oxidase 1 promoter and a formaldehyde dehydrogenase 1 promoter) based on pPIC9 k. To test the function of these promoters, the vector was used to co-express two genes that encode for green fluorescent protein (GFP) and a portion of a gelatin gene (an intra- and extracellular protein). The gelatin gene was placed under the control of PAOX1, while the GFP was under the control of PFLD1. The two proteins were simultaneously expressed upon induction with 0.5% (v/v) methanol. The two promoters functioned effectively and their coexistence on one vector did not affect their efficiency in protein expression. Thus, it was possible to simultaneously induce the expression of at least two proteins from one vector, using two different promoters.     

Antitumor activity of Herceptin in combination with STEALTH liposomal cisplatin or nonliposomal cisplatin in a HER2 positive human breast cancer model

Single agent antitumor activity of Herceptin, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against HER2, has been demonstrated in numerous preclinical and clinical studies. Additionally, combination therapy with Herceptin and chemotherapy (CRx) has demonstrated additive antitumor activity in both preclinical models and early clinical trials. STEALTH (pegylated) liposomal (PL) cisplatin, also known as SPI-077, is currently in clinical trials for a variety of solid tumors. The three studies reported here discuss the antitumor activity of the combination of Herceptin and nonliposomal cisplatin or PL-cisplatin in two xenograft tumor models, initiated from the cell lines, BT474 and MDA453, that overexpress the oncogene, HER2. Herceptin alone had significant antitumor activity in all three experiments (p < 0.0001). Nonliposomal cisplatin and PL-cisplatin were both effective antitumor agents but, at tolerable dose levels, PL-cisplatin was superior to nonliposomal cisplatin (p < 0.0003). The effect of combining Herceptin with the chemotherapeutic cisplatin or PL-cisplatin, was most significant at moderate doses of H (0.5 mg/kg, p < 0.0001), but tended to be greater than either agent alone in all experiments. The combination of PL-cisplatin with Herceptin had statistically similar antitumor activity to that of nonliposomal cisplatin with Herceptin in all experiments. We conclude that combination therapy with PL-cisplatin and Herceptin results in significant antitumor activity with the potential for reducing toxicity in metastatic breast cancer patients.     

Promoter influence on baculovirus-mediated gene expression in permissive and nonpermissive insect cell lines.

The activities of viral and insect promoters were examined in a range of insect cell lines permissive and nonpermissive for the replication of the baculovirus Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus. Recombinant baculoviruses were constructed to place the bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene under the control of promoters strongly active in the early, late, or very late stages of virus replication. In fully permissive cells, expression from a very late promoter was 2- to 3-fold higher than expression from a late promoter and 10- to 20-fold higher than expression from an early promoter or from a virus-borne insect promoter. In cell lines that do not support the efficient production of viral progeny, late-promoter-driven expression was similar to or surpassed very late promoter-driven expression. In nonpermissive insect cell lines, expression driven by an insect promoter derived from Drosophila melanogaster was higher than expression from the three viral promoters and was especially high in the Drosophila cell line tested. Surprisingly, late-promoter-driven expression, which is dependent on DNA replication, was higher than early-promoter-driven expression in three of four nonpermissive lines. In contrast, very late promoter-driven expression was quite limited in nonpermissive cell lines. The results indicate that the promoter used to drive foreign-gene expression strongly influences the range of insect cells which can efficiently support the production of the foreign protein during infection with recombinant baculoviruses.     

Variation in enzymatic transient gene expression assays

We examined causes for high variability in data from enzymatic transient gene expression assays. Our results strongly suggest that variation in transfection efficiency is the major cause of data variation and can seriously compromise valid interpretation of data. We compared averaging data from multiple transfections and cotransfection of a second reporter gene as methods for correcting for variation in transfection efficiency. We found that transfection efficiency can be so highly variable that neither method necessarily overcomes the resulting bias in data. Depending upon the degree in variation in transfection efficiency, a combination of the two methods may be advisable. The need to normalize data for transfection efficiency is dependent upon the difference in strengths of promoters being tested and the relative variability of the transfection method used. We also show that the level of reporter gene expression between transfection experiments performed on different days can vary by more than 10-fold.     

Promoter dependence of enhancer activity.

The interaction of enhancers with different promoters was studied by measuring the influence of two enhancers (from simian virus 40 and from Harvey sarcoma virus) on the activity of expression vectors that are identical except for their promoter region. The promoters examined were from the simian virus 40 early region, with or without its own 72-base-pair repeat, and the mouse beta major-globin gene. It is clear that the promoter acted upon strongly influences the level of activity of an enhancer.     

Influence of bacterial strain genotype on transient expression of plasmid DNA in plant protoplasts

It is demonstrated that transient expression of plasmid DNA in plant protoplasts can be strongly influenced by the bacterial strain used for plasmid propagation. Four different promoter constructs containing two light-responsive and two fungal elicitor-responsive parsley promoters translationally fused to the reporter gene, β-glucuronidase (GUS), were amplified in bacterial strains MC1061, DH5α or GM2163 and tested individually. Marked differences in basal expression levels and in fold inducibilities were observed upon transfection of parsley protoplasts. Low levels of basal expression and strong light or elicitor inducibilities were observed only with plasmid DNA derived from the methylation-deficient GM2163 strain. In vitro methylation of DNA prior to transformation also drastically increased basal expression levels. The results suggest that DNA methylation may be partly responsible for deregulating promoter activity in the transient expression system.     

The 14-3-3 gene expression specificity in response to stress is promoter-dependent

Genomic clone coding for the 16R isoform of 14-3-3 proteins from potato plants has recently been described. This paper reports on 20R-gene isolation and analysis, and compares two isoforms. The northern blot analysis of mRNA of the 20R 14-3-3 isoform suggests its similarity to 16R. Vascular tissue-specific expression and age-dependent synthesis in potato leaves has been detected in both promoters. Screening of the potato genomic library using 20R cDNA isoform resulted in identification and isolation of the corresponding gene. This gene contains four exons and three introns. Inspecting the promoter sequence of the 20R isoform revealed several boxes important for the regulation of gene expression. The strongest GUS expression in transgenic potato plants transformed with the uidA reporter gene under the 20R promoter has been found in young leaf and stem vascular tissue, root tips, pollen and ovules. Mature fragments exhibit a significant decrease in GUS staining, which suggests age-dependent promoter activity. The analysis of transgenic plants transformed with 20R-GUS in contrast to 16R-GUS has revealed strong activation of the 20R promoter by metal ions and NaCl. Instead the 16R promoter is strongly affected by virus and salicylic acid treatments. The only factor, which strongly induced both promoters, was abscisic acid. It is thus suggested that promoter domain composition is the main factor differentiating the appearance of 14-3-3 isoforms.