Repair of Oxidative DNA Damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Malfunction of enzymes that detoxify reactive oxygen species leads to oxidative attack on biomolecules including DNA and consequently activates various DNA repair pathways. The nature of DNA damage and the cell cycle stage at which DNA damage occurs determine the appropriate repair pathway to rectify the damage. Oxidized DNA bases are primarily repaired by base excision repair and nucleotide incision repair. Nucleotide excision repair acts on lesions that distort DNA helix, mismatch repair on mispaired bases, and homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining on double stranded breaks. Post-replication repair that overcomes replication blocks caused by DNA damage also plays a crucial role in protecting the cell from the deleterious effects of oxidative DNA damage. Mitochondrial DNA is also prone to oxidative damage and is efficiently repaired by the cellular DNA repair machinery. In this review, we discuss the DNA repair pathways in relation to the nature of oxidative DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.     

Mitochondrial DNA Repair Pathways

It has long been held that there is no DNA repair in mitochondria. Early observations suggestedthat the reason for the observed accumulation of DNA damage in mitochondrial DNA is thatDNA lesions are not removed. This is in contrast to the very efficient repair that is seen inthe nuclear DNA. Mitochondrial DNA does not code for any DNA repair proteins, but it hasbeen observed that a number of repair factors can be found in mitochondrial extracts. Mostof these participate in the base excision DNA repair pathway which is responsible for theremoval of simple lesions in DNA. Recent work has shown that there is efficient base excisionrepair in mammalian mitochondria and there are also indications of the presence of morecomplex repair processes. Thus, an active field of mitochondrial DNA repair is emerging. Anunderstanding of the DNA repair processes in mammalian mitochondria is an important currentchallenge and it is likely to lead to clarification of the etiology of the common mutations anddeletions that are found in mitochondria, and which are thought to cause various humandisorders and to play a role in the aging phenotype.     

Recombinational DNA repair: the ignored repair systems

The recent finding of a role for the recA gene in DNA replication restart does not negate previous data showing the existence of recA-dependent recombinational DNA repair, which occurs when there are two DNA duplexes present, as in the case for recA-dependent excision repair, for postreplication repair (i.e., the repair of DNA daughter-strand gaps), and for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Recombinational DNA repair is critical for the survival of damaged cells.     

Radioadaptive enhancement of the repair of UV-induced postreplication gaps in Escherichia coli cells deficient in DNA repair

In UV-irradiated E. coli WP2 uvrA, deficient in excision repair of DNA with pyrimidine dimers, gamma-irradiation in low doses (radioadaptation) before UV-irradiation leads to the intensification of postreplication repair of DNA. This process in WP2 uvrA polA and uvrA lexA mutants is less than in WP2 uvrA cells, but in WP2 uvrA recA both postreplication repair and its radioadaptive intensification are absent. In E. coli AB1157 excising pyrimidine dimers the radioadaptive intensification of postreplication repair of DNA is expressed almost to the same extent as in WP2 uvrA. In GW2100 umuC mutant, deficient in DNA polymerase V, postreplication repair of DNA is expressed, but its radioadaptive intensification is absent, while in AB2463 recA13 both postreplication repair of DNA and radioadaptive intensification of postreplication repair of DNA are absent. The above data suggest that DNA polymerase I and LexA protein are needed for radioadaptive intensification of postreplication repair of DNA in uvrA strain, and DNA polymerase V is needed for radioadaptive intensification in E. coli AB1157, and that RecA protein is required for postreplication repair and radioadaptive intensification of postreplication repair of DNA.     

Spontaneous DNA repair in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells

DNA molecules are constantly damaged during mitosis and by oxygen-free radicals produced by either cellular metabolism or by external factors. Populations at risk include patients with cancer-prone disease, patients under enhanced oxidative stress, and those treated with immunosuppressive/cytotoxic therapy. The DNA repair process is crucial in maintaining the genomal DNA integrity. The aim of this study was to evaluate spontaneous DNA repair capacity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from normal blood donors. PBMC DNA repair ability represents DNA repair by other tissues as well. It is shown in the present study that in vitro incorporation of [3H]thymidine in non-stimulated PBMC expresses the ability of the cells to repair DNA damage. This method was validated by double-stranded DNA measurements. Both catalase and Fe2+ increased DNA repair, the former by preventing re-breakage of newly repaired DNA and the latter by introducing additional DNA damage, which enhanced DNA repair. Better understanding of DNA repair processes will enable to minimize DNA damage induced by oxidative stress.     

Mitochondrial DNA repair pathways.

DNA repair mechanisms are fairly well characterized for nuclear DNA while knowledge regarding the repair mechanisms operable in mitochondria is limited. Several lines of evidence suggest that mitochondria contain DNA repair mechanisms. DNA lesions are removed from mtDNA in cells exposed to various chemicals. Protein activities that process damaged DNA have been detected in mitochondria. As will be discussed, there is evidence for base excision repair (BER), direct damage reversal, mismatch repair, and recombinational repair mechanisms in mitochondria, while nucleotide excision repair (NER), as we know it from nuclear repair, is not present.     

DNA repair mechanisms and Toxoplasma gondii infection

Lately, we can observe significant progress in understanding mechanism of DNA repair owing to fast methods of DNA sequence analysis from different organisms the revealing of structure and function of DNA repair proteins in prokaryota and eukaryota. The protozoan parasites survival depends on DNA repair systems. Better understanding of DNA repair systems can help in new antipathogen drug development. This review is aimed at updating our current knowledge of the various repair pathways by providing an overview of DNA repair genes regarding Toxoplasma gondii infections and the corresponding proteins, participating either directly in DNA repair, or in checkpoint control and signaling of DNA damage.     

New tricks for old drugs: the anticarcinogenic potential of DNA repair inhibitors

Defective or abortive repair of DNA lesions has been associated with carcinogenesis. Therefore it is imperative for a cell to accurately repair its DNA after damage if it is to return to a normal cellular phenotype. In certain circumstances, if DNA damage cannot be repaired completely and with high fidelity, it is more advantageous for an organism to have some of its more severely damaged cells die rather than survive as neoplastic transformants. A number of DNA repair inhibitors have the potential to act as anticarcinogenic compounds. These drugs are capable of modulating DNA repair, thus promoting cell death rather than repair of potentially carcinogenic DNA damage mediated by error-prone DNA repair processes. In theory, exposure to a DNA repair inhibitor during, or immediately after, carcinogenic exposure should decrease or prevent tumorigenesis. However, the ability of DNA repair inhibitors to prevent cancer development is difficult to interpret depending upon the system used and the type of genotoxic stress. Inhibitors may act on multiple aspects of DNA repair as well as the cellular signaling pathways activated in response to the initial damage. In this review, we summarize basic DNA repair mechanisms and explore the effects of a number of DNA repair inhibitors that not only potentiate DNA-damaging agents but also decrease carcinogenicity. In particular, we focus on a novel anti-tumor agent, β-lapachone, and its potential to block transformation by modulating poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1.     

Genomic approaches to DNA repair and mutagenesis

DNA damage is a constant threat to cells, causing cytotoxicity as well as inducing genetic alterations. The steady-state abundance of DNA lesions in a cell is minimized by a variety of DNA repair mechanisms, including DNA strand break repair, mismatch repair, nucleotide excision repair, base excision repair, and ribonucleotide excision repair. The efficiencies and mechanisms by which these pathways remove damage from chromosomes have been primarily characterized by investigating the processing of lesions at defined genomic loci, among bulk genomic DNA, on episomal DNA constructs, or using in vitro substrates. However, the structure of a chromosome is heterogeneous, consisting of heavily protein-bound heterochromatic regions, open regulatory regions, actively transcribed genes, and even areas of transient single stranded DNA. Consequently, DNA repair pathways function in a much more diverse set of chromosomal contexts than can be readily assessed using previous methods. Recent efforts to develop whole genome maps of DNA damage, repair processes, and even mutations promise to greatly expand our understanding of DNA repair and mutagenesis. Here we review the current efforts to utilize whole genome maps of DNA damage and mutation to understand how different chromosomal contexts affect DNA excision repair pathways.     

A re-evaluation of DNA repair during skeletal myogenesis in vitro

In previous studies on DNA repair during myogenesis, comparisons made of repair in post-replication myoblasts and in myotubes led to the conclusion that the capacity to repair damage in DNA decreased during myoblast differentiation. Using unscheduled DNA synthesis in response to UV-induced damage as an indicator of DNA repair in a myogenic line of rat skeletal muscle, it is demonstrated that nuclei in myotubes possess identical repair capacity as that in proliferating myoblasts. Furthermore, a brief increase in DNA repair capacity was observed to immediately follow the cessation of replicative DNA synthesis. This transient increase in repair capacity is consistent with the data of earlier reports and explains the previous but inappropriate conclusion that repair diminishes during myogenic differentiation. This transient increase in the capacity to repair DNA was not observed in a developmentally defective, non-differentiating line of similar myogenic origin.     

A role for the human single-stranded DNA binding protein HSSB/RPA in an early stage of nucleotide excision repair.

The human single-stranded DNA binding protein (HSSB/RPA) is involved in several processes that maintain the integrity of the genome including DNA replication, homologous recombination, and nucleotide excision repair of damaged DNA. We report studies that analyze the role of HSSB in DNA repair. Specific protein-protein interactions appear to be involved in the repair function of HSSB, since it cannot be replaced by heterologous single-stranded DNA binding proteins. Anti-HSSB antibodies that inhibit the ability of HSSB to stimulate DNA polymerase alpha also inhibit repair synthesis mediated by human cell-free extracts. However, antibodies that neutralize DNA polymerase alpha do not inhibit repair synthesis. Repair is sensitive to aphidicolin, suggesting that DNA polymerase epsilon or delta participates in nucleotide excision repair by cell extracts. HSSB has a role other than generally stimulating synthesis by DNA polymerases, as it does not enhance the residual damage-dependent background synthesis displayed by repair-deficient extracts from xeroderma pigmentosum cells. Significantly, when damaged DNA is incised by the Escherichia coli UvrABC repair enzyme, human cell extracts can carry out repair synthesis even when HSSB has been neutralized with antibodies. This suggests that HSSB functions in an early stage of repair, rather than exclusively in repair synthesis. A model for the role of HSSB in repair is presented.     

DNA repair synthesis during base excision repair in vitro is catalyzed by DNA polymerase epsilon and is influenced by DNA polymerases alpha and delta in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Base excision repair is an important mechanism for correcting DNA damage produced by many physical and chemical agents. We have examined the effects of the REV3 gene and the DNA polymerase genes POL1, POL2, and POL3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on DNA repair synthesis is nuclear extracts. Deletional inactivation of REV3 did not affect repair synthesis in the base excision repair pathway. Repair synthesis in nuclear extracts of pol1, pol2, and pol3 temperature-sensitive mutants was normal at permissive temperatures. However, repair synthesis in pol2 nuclear extracts was defective at the restrictive temperature of 37 degrees C and could be complemented by the addition of purified yeast DNA polymerase epsilon. Repair synthesis in pol1 nuclear extracts was proficient at the restrictive temperature unless DNA polymerase alpha was inactivated prior to the initiation of DNA repair. Thermal inactivation of DNA polymerase delta in pol3 nuclear extracts enhanced DNA repair synthesis approximately 2-fold, an effect which could be specifically reversed by the addition of purified yeast DNA polymerase delta to the extract. These results demonstrate that DNA repair synthesis in the yeast base excision repair pathway is catalyzed by DNA polymerase epsilon but is apparently modulated by the presence of DNA polymerases alpha and delta.     

Changes in DNA repair during aging

DNA is a precious molecule. It encodes vital information about cellular content and function. There are only two copies of each chromosome in the cell, and once the sequence is lost no replacement is possible. The irreplaceable nature of the DNA sets it apart from other cellular molecules, and makes it a critical target for age-related deterioration. To prevent DNA damage cells have evolved elaborate DNA repair machinery. Paradoxically, DNA repair can itself be subject to age-related changes and deterioration. In this review we will discuss the changes in efficiency of mismatch repair (MMR), base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER) and double-strand break (DSB) repair systems during aging, and potential changes in DSB repair pathway usage that occur with age. Mutations in DNA repair genes and premature aging phenotypes they cause have been reviewed extensively elsewhere, therefore the focus of this review is on the comparison of DNA repair mechanisms in young versus old.     

Fragile DNA repair mechanism reduces ageing in multicellular model

DNA damages, as well as mutations, increase with age. It is believed that these result from increased genotoxic stress and decreased capacity for DNA repair. The two causes are not independent, DNA damage can, for example, through mutations, compromise the capacity for DNA repair, which in turn increases the amount of unrepaired DNA damage. Despite this vicious circle, we ask, can cells maintain a high DNA repair capacity for some time or is repair capacity bound to continuously decline with age? We here present a simple mathematical model for ageing in multicellular systems where cells subjected to DNA damage can undergo full repair, go apoptotic, or accumulate mutations thus reducing DNA repair capacity. Our model predicts that at the tissue level repair rate does not continuously decline with age, but instead has a characteristic extended period of high and non-declining DNA repair capacity, followed by a rapid decline. Furthermore, the time of high functionality increases, and consequently slows down the ageing process, if the DNA repair mechanism itself is vulnerable to DNA damages. Although counterintuitive at first glance, a fragile repair mechanism allows for a faster removal of compromised cells, thus freeing the space for healthy peers. This finding might be a first step toward understanding why a mutation in single DNA repair protein (e.g. Wrn or Blm) is not buffered by other repair proteins and therefore, leads to severe ageing disorders.     

一组多功能的错配修复蛋白

错配修复蛋白是DNA错配修复系统中主要功能蛋白质,主要参与DNA复制过程中对错配碱基的识别和修复.近年来研究表明错配修复蛋白还参与DNA损伤信号的传递、细胞周期的调控、减数分裂和有丝分裂等.错配修复蛋白缺陷会增加患肿瘤的危险性或者直接导致肿瘤;由于错配修复蛋白参与了DNA损伤信号传递、周期调控,错配修复蛋白缺陷还会导致细胞对相关抗癌药物产生耐受.     

The repair rate of radiation-induced DNA damage: a stochastic interpretation based on the gamma function

There is a large body of evidence that stress-induced DNA damage may be responsible for cell lethality, cancer proneness and/or immune reaction. However, statistical features of their repair rate remain poorly documented. In order to interpret the shape of the radiation-induced DNA damage repair curves with a minimum of biological assumptions, we introduced the concept of repair probability, specific to any individual radiation-induced DNA damage, whatever its biochemical type. We strengthened the apparent paradox that the repair rate of a population of DNA damage is time-dependent even if the repair rate of the individual DNA damage is constant. Hence, the existing models, based on a dual approach of the DNA repair may be insufficient for describing the DNA repair rate over a large range of repair times. Since the repair probability of DNA damage cannot be assessed individually, the measurement of the DNA repair rate is assumed to consist in determining the instantaneous mean of all repair probabilities. The relevance of this model was examined with different endpoints: cell species, genotypes, radiation type and chromatin condensation. The Euler's Gamma function was shown to provide the distribution the most consistent with such hypotheses. Furthermore, formulas, deduced from the Gamma distribution, were found to be compatible with our previous model, empirically defined but based on a variable repair half-time.     

Identification of novel DNA repair proteins via primary sequence, secondary structure, and homology

Background  

DNA repair is the general term for the collection of critical mechanisms which repair many forms of DNA damage such as methylation or ionizing radiation. DNA repair has mainly been studied in experimental and clinical situations, and relatively few information-based approaches to new extracting DNA repair knowledge exist. As a first step, automatic detection of DNA repair proteins in genomes via informatics techniques is desirable; however, there are many forms of DNA repair and it is not a straightforward process to identify and classify repair proteins with a single optimal method. We perform a study of the ability of homology and machine learning-based methods to identify and classify DNA repair proteins, as well as scan vertebrate genomes for the presence of novel repair proteins. Combinations of primary sequence polypeptide frequency, secondary structure, and homology information are used as feature information for input to a Support Vector Machine (SVM).     

Cell-cycle defect of DNA repair in progeria skin fibroblasts

We examined the temporal regulation of DNA repair during synchronous cell proliferation in normal and progeroid human fibroblasts. Ultraviolet light-induced (254 nm, 20 J/m2) unscheduled DNA synthesis was measured at 4-h intervals after serum stimulation, for up to 32 h. Normal cells regulated DNA repair in a defined temporal sequence, showing a peak in the induction of DNA repair just before DNA synthesis. Progeroid skin fibroblasts failed to show an increase in nucleotide excision repair before scheduled DNA synthesis, but the background level of DNA repair was not significantly different from that in controls. Regulation of repair in progeroid human fibroblasts appeared similar, but not identical to that previously reported by Gupta and Sirover (1984b) for xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C. Our results suggest that patients with Hutchinson-Gilford progeria may have a defect in DNA repair; the results offer nominal evidence that the average level of UV-induced DNA is decreased, and that individuals with this disease lack both the normal enhancement of DNA repair before scheduled DNA synthesis and the temporal control of DNA repair.