A Comparison of Technique Modifications in Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of different technique modifications in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Design

Systematic review and meta-analyses.

Data Sources

Searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Central from January 1st 1997 until April 1st 2014.

Study Design

All cohort studies and randomized clinical trials comparing fully laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with modifications of the standard technique including hand-assisted, retroperitoneoscopic and single port techniques, were included.

Data-Extraction and Analysis

The primary outcome measure was the number of complications. Secondary outcome measures included: conversion to open surgery, first warm ischemia time, estimated blood loss, graft function, operation time and length of hospital stay. Each technique modification was compared with standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Data was pooled with a random effects meta-analysis using odds ratios, weighted mean differences and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals. To assess heterogeneity, the I2 statistic was used. First, randomized clinical trials and cohort studies were analyzed separately, when data was comparable, pooled analysis were performed.

Results

31 studies comparing laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with other technique modifications were identified, including 5 randomized clinical trials and 26 cohort studies. Since data of randomized clinical trials and cohort studies were comparable, these data were pooled. There were significantly less complications in the retroperitoneoscopic group as compared to transperitoneal group (OR 0.52, 95%CI 0.33–0.83, I2 = 0%). Hand-assisted techniques showed shorter first warm ischemia and operation times.

Conclusions

Hand-assistance reduces the operation and first warm ischemia times and may improve safety for surgeons with less experience in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. The retroperitoneoscopic approach was significantly associated with less complications. However, given the, in general, poor to intermediate quality and considerable heterogeneity in the included studies, further high-quality studies are required.

Trial Registration

The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database before the start of the review process (CRD number 42013006565).     

Grafting of a Single Donor Myofibre Promotes Hypertrophy in Dystrophic Mouse Muscle

Skeletal muscle has a remarkable capability of regeneration following injury. Satellite cells, the principal muscle stem cells, are responsible for this process. However, this regenerative capacity is reduced in muscular dystrophies or in old age: in both these situations, there is a net loss of muscle fibres. Promoting skeletal muscle muscle hypertrophy could therefore have potential applications for treating muscular dystrophies or sarcopenia. Here, we observed that muscles of dystrophic mdx nude host mice that had been acutely injured by myotoxin and grafted with a single myofibre derived from a normal donor mouse exhibited increased muscle area. Transplantation experiments revealed that the hypertrophic effect is mediated by the grafted fibre and does not require either an imposed injury to the host muscle, or the contribution of donor cells to the host muscle. These results suggest the presence of a crucial cross-talk between the donor fibre and the host muscle environment.     

1H-NMR Assignment of Single Strand and Duplex Splice Domain of the Consensus Donor Exon:Intron Junction

Abstract

The high field ¹H-NMR assignments of a single strand consensus donor exon: intron junction and that of the duplex splice domain has been achieved using 2D-NMR and additional techniques.     

开放根治性和腹腔镜下肾切除术对比分析

目的：对比分析开放根治性和后腹腔镜肾切除术的手术效果。方法：回顾对比分析2009年10月-2012年4月行开放根治性肾切除术28例和后腹腔镜肾切除术25例,观察手术时间、术中出血量,术后胃肠恢复时间,术后住院时间等情况。结果：开放根治性肾切除术手术时间为65-250 min平均155 min。后腹腔镜肾切除术手术时间70-240 min,平均152 min。两者不具有统计学差异（P〉0.05）。开放根治性肾切除术手术术中出血200~1000mL,平均600 mL。后腹腔镜肾切除术手术术中出血50-320 mL,平均165 mL。两者具有统计学差异（P〈0.05）。开放根治性肾切除术手术术后胃肠功能恢复时间48-98 h,平均74 h;术后住院时间7-12 d,平均10 d。后腹腔镜肾切除术手术术后胃肠功能恢复时间18-72 h,平均35 h;术后住院时间4-8 d,平均7 d。两者具有统计学差异（P〈0.05）。结论：后腹腔镜下手术肾切除具有创伤小、出血少、恢复快等优点,但对适应症选择方面应慎重。     

Laparoscopic Nephrectomy versus Open Nephrectomy for Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To compare efficacy and safety of laparoscopicnephrectomy (LN) versusopen nephrectomy (ON) in the management of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

A systematic search of the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was performed up to October 2014.This systematic review was performed based on observational comparative studies that assessed the two techniques. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and risk ratio (RR), with their corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI), were calculated to compare continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively.

Results

Seven studies were identified, including 195 cases (118 LN / 77 ON). Although LN was associated with longer operative time (WMD 30.236, 95%CI 14.541 −45.932, P<0.001) and the specimen might not have been resected as heavy as the ON group (WMD -986.516, 95%CI -1883.24–-89.795, P = 0.031), patients in this group might benefit from a shorter length of hospital stay (WMD -3.576, 95%CI 4.976–-2.176, P <0.001), less estimated blood loss (WMD -180.245, 95%CI -317.939–-42.556, P = 0.010), and lower need of transfusion (RR 0.345, 95%CI 0.183–0.650, P = 0.001). The LN group also had less overall complications (RR 0.545, 95%CI 0.329–0.903, P = 0.018). The need of narcotic analgesics between the two groups might have no significant difference (WMD -54.66, 95%CI -129.76–20.44, P = 0.154).

Conclusion

LN for giant symptomatic ADPKD was feasible, safe and efficacious. Morbidity was significantly reduced compared with the open approach. For an experienced laparoscopist, LN might be a better alternative.