改良手工显微切割法获取特定细胞提取高质量RNA

探讨显微切割过程中有效保持RNA完整性的组织固定方法,建立一种简易的手工显微切割法.应用自制“T形板”辅助冰冻切片,100％无水乙醇一次性脱水固定,“排除切割法”获取目的细胞,用TRIzol提取RNA,琼脂糖凝胶电泳和RT-PCR分析RNA质量.“一步法”固定可长时间保存RNA的完整性;从食管癌标本5个特定阶段的细胞中提取的RNA,经电泳和RT-PCR分析均具有较高的质量.无水乙醇“一步法”固定,在显微切割的过程中可有效保持RNA的完整性;T形板和“排除切割法”简化了手工显微切割的操作,提取的RNA质、量均可满足后续分子水平研究的需要.     

Navigated laser capture microdissection as an alternative to direct histological staining for proteomic analysis of brain samples

Proteomic analysis of the brain is complicated by the need to obtain cells from specific anatomical regions, or nuclei. Laser capture microdissection (LCM) is a technique that is precise enough to dissect single cells within a tissue section, and thus could be useful for isolating specific brain nuclei for analysis. However, we and others have previously demonstrated that histological staining protocols used to guide LCM have detrimental effects on protein separation by two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE). Here we describe a new LCM method called navigated LCM. This microdissection method uses fixed but unstained tissue as starting material and thus enables us to avoid artifacts induced by tissue staining. By comparing 2-DE results obtained from fixed, unstained LCM brain tissue samples to those obtained from manually dissected samples, we demonstrated that this microdissection process gave similar protein recovery rates and similar resolution of protein spots on 2-DE gels. Moreover, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry analysis of selected spots from gels derived from control and fixed, LCM samples revealed that the fixation-LCM process had no effect on protein identification. Navigated LCM of tissue sections is therefore a practical and powerful method for performing proteomic studies in specifically defined brain regions.     

Optimal molecular profiling of tissue and tissue components

Isolation of well-preserved pure cell populations is a prerequisite for sound studies of the molecular basis of any tissue-based biological phenomenon. This article reviews current methods for obtaining anatomically specific signals from molecules isolated from tissues, a basic requirement for productive linking of phenotype and genotype. The quality of samples isolated from tissue and used for molecular analysis is often glossed over or omitted from publications, making interpretation and replication of data difficult or impossible. Fortunately, recently developed techniques allow life scientists to better document and control the quality of samples used for a given assay, creating a foundation for improvement in this area. Tissue processing for molecular studies usually involves some or all of the following steps: tissue collection, gross dissection/identification, fixation, processing/embedding, storage/archiving, sectioning, staining, microdissection/annotation, and pure analyte labeling/identification and quantification. We provide a detailed comparison of some current tissue microdissection technologies, and provide detailed example protocols for tissue component handling upstream and downstream from microdissection. We also discuss some of the physical and chemical issues related to optimal tissue processing, and include methods specific to cytology specimens. We encourage each laboratory to use these as a starting point for optimization of their overall process of moving from collected tissue to high quality, appropriately anatomically tagged scientific results. In optimized protocols is a source of inefficiency in current life science research. Improvement in this area will significantly increase life science quality and productivity. The article is divided into introduction, materials, protocols, and notes sections. Because many protocols are covered in each of these sections, information relating to a single protocol is not contiguous. To get the greatest benefit from this article, readers are advised to read through the entire article first, identify protocols appropriate to their laboratory for each step in their workflow, and then reread entries in each section pertaining to each of these single protocols.     

激光微切割与定量PCR技术分析肾脏病理切片RNA

采用激光微切割与定量PCR技术,分析使用不同提取方法从不同固定方法固定的病理切片中提取的RNA.用70%乙醇、丙酮、甲醇、4%多聚甲醛固定肾脏冰冻切片,使用激光微切割技术切取肾小球,用硫氰酸胍方法(guanidinethiocyanatemethods,GTC)和Trizol试剂方法提取RNA,使用Taqman定量PCR方法分析比较各组RNA的量;选取丙酮固定的石蜡切片,使用激光微切割技术切取肾小球,采用RNA裂解液提取RNA,使用Taqman定量PCR方法,比较石蜡切片和冰冻切片中RNA含量.结果显示:提取沉淀性固定剂如乙醇、丙酮、甲醇固定的冰冻切片的RNA时,2种提取方法和3种固定方法对RNA含量的影响都无明显差异;但在提取4%多聚甲醛固定冰冻切片时,使用Trizol提取RNA含量明显高于使用GTC方法,且其含量与沉淀性固定剂固定的切片RNA含量无明显差异.石蜡切片中经激光微切割肾小球的RNA含量与冰冻切片经激光微切割肾小球的RNA含量无明显差异.结果提示:切片的固定方法和RNA的提取方法是影响切片RNA提取量的主要原因.     

Application of laser-capture microdissection to analysis of gene expression in the testis

The isolation and molecular analysis of highly purified cell populations from complex, heterogeneous tissues has been a challenge for many years. Spermatogenesis in the testis is a particularly difficult process to study given the unique multiple cellular associations within the seminiferous epithelium, making the isolation of specific cell types difficult. Laser-capture microdissection (LCM) is a recently developed technique that enables the isolation of individual cell populations from complex tissues. This technology has enhanced our ability to directly examine gene expression in enriched testicular cell populations by routine methods of gene expression analysis, such as real-time RT-PCR, differential display, and gene microarrays. The application of LCM has however introduced methodological hurdles that have not been encountered with more conventional molecular analyses of whole tissue. In particular, tissue handling (i.e. fixation, storage, and staining), consumables (e.g. slide choice), staining reagents (conventional H&E vs. fluorescence), extraction methods, and downstream applications have all required re-optimisation to facilitate differential gene expression analysis using the small amounts of material obtained using LCM. This review will discuss three critical issues that are essential for successful procurement of cells from testicular tissue sections; tissue morphology, capture success, and maintenance of molecular integrity. The importance of these issues will be discussed with specific reference to the two most commonly used LCM systems; the Arcturus PixCell IIe and PALM systems. The rat testis will be used as a model, and emphasis will be placed on issues of tissue handling, processing, and staining methods, including the application of fluorescence techniques to assist in the identification of cells of interest for the purposes of mRNA expression analysis.     

Preventing arginine-to-proline conversion in a cell-line-independent manner during cell cultivation under stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) conditions

Laser capture microdissection of frozen tissue sections allows homogeneous cell populations to be isolated for expression profiling. However, this requires striking a balance between retaining adequate morphology for accurate microdissection and maintaining RNA integrity. Various staining protocols were applied to frozen endometrial carcinoma tissue sections. Although alcohol-based methods were superior to aqueous stains for maintaining RNA integrity, they suffered from irreproducible staining intensity. We developed a modified alcohol-based, buffered cresyl violet staining protocol that provides reproducible staining with minimal RNA degradation suitable for tissues with moderate to high levels of intrinsic RNase activity.     

Epigenetic analysis of laser capture microdissected fetal epithelia

Laser capture microdissection (LCM) is a superior method for nondestructive collection of specific cell populations from tissue sections. Although DNA, RNA, and protein have been analyzed from LCM-procured samples, epigenetic analyses, particularly of fetal, highly hydrated tissue, have not been attempted. A standardized protocol with quality assurance measures was established to procure cells by LCM of the medial edge epithelia (MEE) of the fetal palatal processes for isolation of intact microRNA for expression analyses and genomic DNA (gDNA) for CpG methylation analyses. MicroRNA preparations, obtained using the RNAqueous Micro kit (Life Technologies), exhibited better yields and higher quality than those obtained using the Arcturus PicoPure RNA Isolation kit (Life Technologies). The approach was validated using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to determine expression of selected microRNAs (miR-99a and miR-200b) and pyrosequencing to determine CpG methylation status of selected genes (Aph1a and Dkk4) in the MEE. These studies describe an optimized approach for employing LCM of epithelial cells from fresh frozen fetal tissue that enables quantitative analyses of microRNA expression levels and CpG methylation.     

Aberrant methylation of p16, HIC1, N33, and GSTP1 in tumor epithelium and tumor-associated cells in prostate cancer

The methylation status of p16, HIC1, N33, and GSTP1, which are involved in prostate carcinogenesis, was studied in prostate tissue samples containing neoplasms. Malignant acini, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) foci, and stroma surrounding glandular structures of each type were detected in histological sections, using laser capture microdissection of prostate tissue. High levels of methylation were found in tumor epithelium and adjacent tumor-associated stromal cells. Epigenetic changes in the stroma are indicative of a major role of tumor microenvironment in cancer development and progression. The methylation status of p16, HIC1, N33, and GSTP1 was also assessed in prostate biopsy material and operative tumor samples without laser capture microdissection. The methylation frequencies of all genes in tumor samples were considerably lower than those in microdissected tumor samples (HIC1, 71% vs. 89%; p16, 22% vs. 78%; GSTP1, 32% vs. 100%; and N33, 20% vs. 33%, respectively). It was concluded that laser capture micro-dissection is required in molecular analysis of tumors of this type.     

Evaluation of ethanol-fixed,paraffin-embedded tissues for proteomic applications

We previously reported that ethanol fixation and paraffin embedding of tissues produce excellent histomorphology and good preservation of macromolecules. Here, we present a detailed evaluation of ethanol-fixed tissues for proteomic initiatives. When proteins were extracted from ethanol-fixed, paraffin-embedded prostate tissue, resolved by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE), and stained by standard methods, several hundred protein molecules could be detected and successfully analyzed by mass spectrometry. Protein profiles obtained from ethanol-fixed tissues were highly similar to those observed from frozen tissues, in contrast to the poor protein recovery from formalin-fixed material. The protein content of specific cells that were microdissected from ethanol-fixed tissue sections using laser capture microdissection could also be successfully analyzed by 2-DE. We observed that eosin staining of tissue sections had a detrimental effect on protein separation, whereas hematoxylin staining had minimal consequence. In order to illustrate the applicability of ethanol-fixed tissues for proteomic discovery studies, we compared the protein profiles of patient-matched, normal prostatic epithelial cells and invasive adenocarcinoma cells obtained from ethanol-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. A number of differentially expressed proteins was discovered and identified by mass spectrometry. Immunohistochemical analyses performed on ethanol-fixed tissue sections were in agreement with the proteomic discovery findings. In light of these results, we conclude that ethanol-fixed tissues can be successfully utilized for proteomic analyses.     

Laser microdissection of semi-thin sections from plastic-embedded tissue for studying plant–organism developmental processes at single-cell resolution

The ability to analyze the gene activity occurring within a single cell has ushered in a new understanding of complex biological processes. Furthermore, this capability has established the prerequisite technologies for the analysis of cells involved in complex pathogenic and/or symbiotic interactions. Collectively, the identification of biological models permitting the analysis of individual cells and improvements in histological technology are allowing for analyses of cells positioned within tissues and involved in complex cellular interactions at unprecedented resolution. Here, a plastic embedding procedure is used for laser microdissection of plant tissues infected with a pathogen. This technique enabled the acquisition of nucleic acids from semi-thin sections that can be used for downstream biological studies of host–pathogen interaction at the single-cell resolution.     

Laser‐assisted microdissection of polytene chromosomes from Diptera for the development of molecular markers

The structural details visible under the light microscope have made polytene chromosomes from Diptera much used in studies of the taxonomy, evolution and genetics of important biological models such as Drosophila and Chironomus, and the medical entomology of important disease vectors such as blackflies and mosquitoes. This paper describes the isolation of sections of polytene chromosomes from preserved wild‐caught blackflies using off‐the‐shelf laser microdissection microscopy and subsequent analysis of the DNA using polymerase chain reaction. This allows a direct link between the visible structure of the genome and the unknown DNA sequence, facilitating the development of molecular markers for population cytogenetics and cytotaxonomy.     

PCR enrichment techniques to identify the diet of predators

The increasing sensitivity of PCR has meant that in the last two decades PCR has emerged as a major tool in diet studies, enabling us to refine our understanding of trophic links and to elucidate the diets of predators whose prey is as yet uncharacterized. The achievements and methods of PCR-based diet studies have been reviewed several times, but here we review an important development in the field: the use of PCR enrichment techniques to promote the amplification of prey DNA over that of the predator. We first discuss the success of using group-specific primers either in parallel single reactions or in multiplex reactions. We then concentrate on the more recent use of PCR enrichment techniques such as restriction enzyme digests, peptide nucleic acid clamping, DNA blocking and laser capture microdissection. We also survey the vast literature on enrichment techniques in clinical biology, to ascertain the pitfalls of enrichment techniques and what refinements have yielded some highly sensitive methods. We find that while there are several new approaches to enrichment, peptide nucleic acid clamping and DNA blocking are generally sufficient techniques for the characterization of diets of predators and highlight the most important considerations of the approach.     

Optimizing Staining Protocols for Laser Microdissection of Specific Cell Types from the Testis Including Carcinoma In Situ

Microarray and RT-PCR based methods are important tools for analysis of gene expression; however, in tissues containing many different cells types, such as the testis, characterization of gene expression in specific cell types can be severely hampered by noise from other cells. The laser microdissection technology allows for enrichment of specific cell types. However, when the cells are not morphologically distinguishable, it is necessary to use a specific staining method for the target cells. In this study we have tested different fixatives, storage conditions for frozen sections and staining protocols, and present two staining protocols for frozen sections, one for fast and specific staining of fetal germ cells, testicular carcinoma in situ cells, and other cells with embryonic stem cell-like properties that express the alkaline phosphatase, and one for specific staining of lipid droplet-containing cells, which is useful for isolation of the androgen-producing Leydig cells. Both protocols retain a morphology that is compatible with laser microdissection and yield RNA of a quality suitable for PCR and microarray analysis.