DNA motif associated with meiotic double-strand break regions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Meiotic recombination in yeast is initiated by DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that occur at preferred sites, distributed along the chromosomes. These DSB sites undergo changes in chromatin structure early in meiosis, but their common features at the level of DNA sequence have not been defined until now. Alignment of 1 kb sequences flanking six well-mapped DSBs has allowed us to define a flexible sequence motif, the CoHR profile, which predicts the great majority of meiotic DSB locations. The 50 bp profile contains a poly(A) tract in its centre and may have several gaps of unrelated sequences over a total length of up to 250 bp. The major exceptions to the correlation between CoHRs and preferred DSB sites are at telomeric regions, where DSBs do not occur. The CoHR sequence may provide the basis for understanding meiosis-induced chromatin changes that enable DSBs to occur at defined chromosomal sites.     

Pch2 modulates chromatid partner choice during meiotic double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In most organisms, the segregation of chromosomes during the first meiotic division is dependent upon at least one crossover (CO) between each pair of homologous chromosomes. COs can result from chromosome double-strand breaks (DSBs) that are induced and preferentially repaired using the homologous chromosome as a template. The PCH2 gene of budding yeast is required to establish proper meiotic chromosome axis structure and to regulate meiotic interhomolog DSB repair outcomes. These roles appear conserved in the mouse ortholog of PCH2, Trip13, which is also involved in meiotic chromosome axis organization and the regulation of DSB repair. Using a combination of genetic and physical assays to monitor meiotic DSB repair, we present data consistent with pch2Δ mutants showing defects in suppressing intersister DSB repair. These defects appear most pronounced in dmc1Δ mutants, which are defective for interhomolog repair, and explain the previously reported observation that pch2Δ dmc1Δ cells can complete meiosis. Results from genetic epistasis analyses involving spo13Δ, rad54Δ, and mek1/MEK1 alleles and an intersister recombination reporter assay are also consistent with Pch2 acting to limit intersister repair. We propose a model in which Pch2 is required to promote full Mek1 activity and thereby promotes interhomolog repair.     

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mer2, Mei4 and Rec114 form a complex required for meiotic double-strand break formation

In budding yeast, at least 10 proteins are required for formation of the double-strand breaks (DSBs) that initiate meiotic recombination. Spo11 is the enzyme responsible for cleaving DNA and is found in a complex that also contains Ski8, Rec102, and Rec104. The Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 complex is required for both DSB formation and DSB processing. In this article we investigate the functions of the remaining three proteins--Mer2, Mei4, and Rec114--with particular emphasis on Mer2. The Mer2 protein is present in vegetative cells, but it increases in abundance and becomes phosphorylated specifically during meiotic prophase. Mer2 localizes to distinct foci on meiotic chromosomes, with foci maximally abundant prior to the formation of synaptonemal complex. If DSB formation is blocked (e.g., by a spo11 mutation), dephosphorylation of Mer2 and its dissociation from chromosomes are delayed. We have also found that the Mei4 and Rec114 proteins localize to foci on chromosomes and these foci partially colocalize with each other and with Mer2. Furthermore, the three proteins co-immunoprecipitate. Mer2 does not show significant colocalization with Mre11 or Rec102 and Mer2 does not co-immunoprecipitate with Rec102. We propose that Mer2, Mei4, and Rec114 form a distinct complex required for DSB formation.     

Genome-wide redistribution of meiotic double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Meiotic recombination is initiated by the formation of programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) catalyzed by the Spo11 protein. DSBs are not randomly distributed along chromosomes. To better understand factors that control the distribution of DSBs in budding yeast, we have examined the genome-wide binding and cleavage properties of the Gal4 DNA binding domain (Gal4BD)-Spo11 fusion protein. We found that Gal4BD-Spo11 cleaves only a subset of its binding sites, indicating that the association of Spo11 with chromatin is not sufficient for DSB formation. In centromere-associated regions, the centromere itself prevents DSB cleavage by tethered Gal4BD-Spo11 since its displacement restores targeted DSB formation. In addition, we observed that new DSBs introduced by Gal4BD-Spo11 inhibit surrounding DSB formation over long distances (up to 60 kb), keeping constant the number of DSBs per chromosomal region. Together, these results demonstrate that the targeting of Spo11 to new chromosomal locations leads to both local stimulation and genome-wide redistribution of recombination initiation and that some chromosomal regions are inherently cold regardless of the presence of Spo11.     

Multiple sites for double-strand breaks in whole meiotic chromosomes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

We present a scheme for locating double-strand breaks (DSBs) in meiotic chromosomes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, based on the separation of large DNA molecules by pulsed field gel electrophoresis. Using a rad50S mutant, in which DSBs are not processed, we show that DSBs are widely induced in S. cerevisiae chromosomes during meiosis. Some of the DSBs accumulate at certain preferred sites. We present general profiles of DSBs in chromosomes III, V, VI and VII. A map of the 12 preferred sites on chromosome III is presented. At least some of these sites correlate with known 'hot spots' for meiotic recombination. The data are discussed in view of current models of meiotic recombination and chromosome segregation.     

Aberrant double-strand break repair in rad51 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

A number of studies of Saccharomyces cerevisiae have revealed RAD51-independent recombination events. These include spontaneous and double-strand break-induced recombination between repeated sequences, and capture of a chromosome arm by break-induced replication. Although recombination between inverted repeats is considered to be a conservative intramolecular event, the lack of requirement for RAD51 suggests that repair can also occur by a nonconservative mechanism. We propose a model for RAD51-independent recombination by one-ended strand invasion coupled to DNA synthesis, followed by single-strand annealing. The Rad1/Rad10 endonuclease is required to trim intermediates formed during single-strand annealing and thus was expected to be required for RAD51-independent events by this model. Double-strand break repair between plasmid-borne inverted repeats was less efficient in rad1 rad51 double mutants than in rad1 and rad51 strains. In addition, repair events were delayed and frequently associated with plasmid loss. Furthermore, the repair products recovered from the rad1 rad51 strain were primarily in the crossover configuration, inconsistent with conservative models for mitotic double-strand break repair.     

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae PDS1 and RAD9 checkpoint genes control different DNA double-strand break repair pathways

In response to DNA damage, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae securin Pds1 blocks anaphase promotion by inhibiting ESP1-dependent degradation of cohesins. PDS1 is positioned downstream of the MEC1- and RAD9-mediated DNA damage-induced signal transduction pathways. Because cohesins participate in postreplicative repair and the pds1 mutant is radiation sensitive, we identified DNA repair pathways that are PDS1-dependent. We compared the radiation sensitivities and recombination phenotypes of pds1, rad9, rad51 single and double mutants, and found that whereas pds1 rad9 double mutants were synergistically more radiation sensitive than single mutants, pds1 rad51 mutants were not. To determine the role of PDS1 in recombinational repair pathways, we measured spontaneous and DNA damage-associated sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) after exposure to X rays, UV and methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and after the initiation of an HO endonuclease-generated double-strand break (DSB). The rates of spontaneous SCE and frequencies of DNA damage-associated SCE were similar in wild type and pds1 strains, but the latter exhibited reduced viability after exposure to DNA damaging agents. To determine whether pds1 mutants were defective in other pathways for DSB repair, we measured both single-strand annealing (SSA) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) in pds1 mutants. We found that the pds1 mutant was defective in SSA but efficient at ligating cohesive ends present on a linear plasmid. We therefore suggest that checkpoint genes control different pathways for DSB repair, and PDS1 and RAD9 have different roles in recombinational repair.     

Sister chromatid cohesion is required for postreplicative double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks by recombination requires the presence of an undamaged copy that is used as a template during the repair process. Because cells acquire resistance to gamma irradiation during DNA replication and because sister chromatids are the preferred partner for double-strand break repair in mitotic diploid yeast cells, it has long been suspected that cohesion between sister chromatids might be crucial for efficient repair. This hypothesis is consistent with the sensitivity to gamma irradiation of mutants defective in the cohesin complex that holds sister chromatids together from DNA replication until the onset of anaphase (reviewed in) . It is also in accordance with the finding that surveillance mechanisms (checkpoints) that sense DNA damage arrest cell cycle progression in yeast by causing stabilization of the securin Pds1, thereby blocking sister chromatid separation. The hypersensitivity to irradiation of cohesin mutants could, however, be due to a more direct involvement of the cohesin complex in the process of DNA repair. We show here that passage through S phase in the presence of cohesin, and not cohesin per se, is essential for efficient double-strand break repair during G2 in yeast. Proteins needed to load cohesin onto chromosomes (Scc2) and to generate cohesion during S phase (Eco1) are also shown to be required for repair. Our results confirm what has long been suspected but never proven, that cohesion between sister chromatids is essential for efficient double-strand break repair in mitotic cells.     

Intra-chromosomal gene conversion induced by a DNA double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

We have stimulated mitotic and meiotic gene conversion between non-tandem direct repeats of ADE4 by a defined double-strand break imparted in vivo to one of two copies of the gene. The experimental design permitted us to distinguish unambiguously between reciprocal intra-chromosomal crossing over and non-reciprocal break-join events that could accompany the induced conversions. We observed that (1) less than 10% of the induced conversion events are accompanied by intra-chromosomal crossing over in both mitosis and meiosis; (2) non-reciprocal break-join is not stimulated by the double-strand breaks; (3) a double-strand break in meiosis is repaired off intra-chromosomal homology (if available) with approximately sevenfold preference over repair off the homologous chromosome. Our observations, analyzed in the light of previous investigations of spontaneous inter and intra-chromosomal crossing over and gene conversion, lead to the view that chromosomal configuration constrains intra-chromosomal crossing over accompanying conversion between closely spaced repeated genes during resolution of the conversion intermediate.     

Identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA ligase IV: involvement in DNA double-strand break repair.

DNA ligases catalyse the joining of single and double-strand DNA breaks, which is an essential final step in DNA replication, recombination and repair. Mammalian cells have four DNA ligases, termed ligases I-IV. In contrast, other than a DNA ligase I homologue (encoded by CDC9), no other DNA ligases have hitherto been identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here, we report the identification and characterization of a novel gene, LIG4, which encodes a protein with strong homology to mammalian DNA ligase IV. Unlike CDC9, LIG4 is not essential for DNA replication, RAD52-dependent homologous recombination nor the repair of UV light-induced DNA damage. Instead, it encodes a crucial component of the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) apparatus, which repairs DNA double-strand breaks that are generated by ionizing radiation or restriction enzyme digestion: a function which cannot be complemented by CDC9. Lig4p acts in the same DNA repair pathway as the DNA end-binding protein Ku. However, unlike Ku, it does not function in telomere length homeostasis. These findings indicate diversification of function between different eukaryotic DNA ligases. Furthermore, they provide insights into mechanisms of DNA repair and suggest that the NHEJ pathway is highly conserved throughout the eukaryotic kingdom.     

DNA strand breaks signal the induction of DNA double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genotoxic stress induces a checkpoint signaling cascade to generate a stress response. Saccharomyces cerevisiae shows an altered radiation response under different type of stress. Although the induction of repair has been implicated in enhanced survival after exposure to the challenging stress, the nature of the signal remains poorly understood. This study demonstrates that low doses of gamma radiation and bleomycin induce RAD52-dependent recombination repair pathway in the wild-type strain D-261. Prior exposure of cells to DNA-damaging agents (gamma radiation or bleomycin) equips them better for the subsequent damage caused by challenging doses. However, exposure to UV light, which does not cause strand breaks, was ineffective. This was confirmed by PFGE studies. This indicates that the strand breaks probably serve as the signal for induction of the recombination repair pathway while pyrimidine dimers do not. The nature of the induced repair was investigated by mutation scoring in special strain D-7, which showed that the induced repair is essentially error free.     

A test of the CoHR motif associated with meiotic double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Meiotic recombination is not random along chromosomes; rather, there are preferred regions for initiation called hotspots. Although the general properties of meiotic hotspots are known, the requirements at the DNA sequence level for the determination of hotspot activity are still unclear. The sequence of six known hotspots in Saccharomyces cerevisiae was compared to identify a common homology region (CoHR). They reported that the locations of CoHR sequences correspond to mapped double-strand break (DSB) sites along three chromosomes (I, III, VI). We report here that a deletion of CoHR at HIS2, a hotspot used to identify the motif, has no significant effect on recombination. In the absence of CoHR, DSB formation occurs at a high frequency and at the same sequences as in wild-type strains. In cases where the deletion of sequences containing the CoHR motif has been shown to reduce recombination, we propose that it may be a reflection of the location of the deletion, rather than the loss of CoHR, per se.     

Saccharomyces cerevisiae LIF1: a function involved in DNA double-strand break repair related to mammalian XRCC4.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA ligase IV (LIG4) has been shown previously to be involved in non-homologous DNA end joining and meiosis. The homologous mammalian DNA ligase IV interacts with XRCC4, a protein implicated in V(D)J recombination and double-strand break repair. Here, we report the discovery of LIF1, a S.cerevisiae protein that strongly interacts with the C-terminal BRCT domain of yeast LIG4. LIG4 and LIF1 apparently occur as a heterodimer in vivo. LIF1 shares limited sequence homology with mammalian XRCC4. Disruption of the LIF1 gene abolishes the capacity of cells to recircularize transformed linearized plasmids correctly by non-homologous DNA end joining. Loss of LIF1 is also associated with conditional hypersensitivity of cells to ionizing irradiation and with reduced sporulation efficiency. Thus, with respect to their phenotype, lif1 strains are similar to the previously described lig4 mutants. One function of LIF1 is the stabilization of the LIG4 enzyme. The finding of a XRCC4 homologue in S.cerevisiae now allows for mutational analyses of structure-function relationships in XRCC4-like proteins to define their role in DNA double-strand break repair.     

Mechanisms and control of meiotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Recent studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have provided new insights in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of meiotic recombination. Meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breaks have been detected and have been shown to be the lesions that initiate recombination events. These are located mostly in promoter regions where the chromatin is in an open configuration, and cluster in domains along the chromosome. They are likely to be made by a topoisomerase II-like protein encoded by the SPO11 gene. Several DNA intermediates in the meiotic double strand-break repair pathway have been characterised and several multi-protein complexes have been identified and shown to be involved at different steps in the repair pathway. The conservation of these protein complexes in higher eukaryotes suggests that the meiotic recombination mechanism could be conserved. With the application of the well characterised genetical, molecular, cytological and biochemical techniques and the recently developed technology for genomic studies (biochips), we can expect a rapid increase in our comprehension of the meiotic recombination process.     

Two pathways for removal of nonhomologous DNA ends during double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

During repair of a double-strand break (DSB) by gene conversion, one or both 3' ends of the DSB invade a homologous donor sequence and initiate new DNA synthesis. The use of the invading DNA strand as a primer for new DNA synthesis requires that any nonhomologous bases at the 3' end be removed. We have previously shown that removal of a 3' nonhomologous tail in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on the nucleotide excision repair endonuclease Rad1/Rad10, and also on the mismatch repair proteins Msh2 and Msh3. We now report that these four proteins are needed only when the nonhomologous ends of recombining DNA are 30 nucleotides (nt) long or longer. An additional protein, the helicase Srs2, is required for the RAD1-dependent removal of long 3' tails. We suggest that Srs2 acts to extend and stabilize the initial nascent joint between the invading single strand and its homolog. 3' tails shorter than 30 nt are removed by another mechanism that depends at least in part on the 3'-to-5' proofreading activity of DNA polymerase delta.     

The nucleotide mapping of DNA double-strand breaks at the CYS3 initiation site of meiotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Initiation of meiotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae occurs by localized DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) at several locations in the genome, corresponding to hot spots for meiotic gene conversion and crossing over. The meiotic DSBs occur in regions of chromatin that are hypersensitive to nucleases. To gain insight into the molecular mechanism involved in the formation of these DSBs, we have determined their positions at the nucleotide level at the CYS3 hot spot of gene conversion on chromosome I. We found four major new features of these DSBs: (i) sites of DSBs are multiple with varying intensities and spacing within the promoter region of the CYS3 gene; (ii) no consensus sequence can be found at these sites, indicating that the activity involved in DSB formation has little or no sequence specificity; (iii) the breaks are generated by blunt cleavages; and (iv) the 5' ends are modified in rad50S mutant strains, where the processing of these ends is known to be prevented. We present a model for the initiation of meiotic recombination taking into account the implications of these results.     

Influence of non-homology between recombining DNA sequences on double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In this paper we study the influence of non-homology between plasmid and chromosomal DNA on the efficiency of recombinational repair of plasmid double-strand breaks and gaps in yeast. For this purpose we used different combinations of plasmids and yeast strains carrying various deletions within the yeast LYS2 gene. A 400 by deletion in plasmid DNA had no effect on recombinational plasmid repair. However, a 400 by deletion in chromosomal DNA dramatically reduced the efficiency of this repair mechanism, but recombinational repair of plasmids linearized by a double-strand break with cohesive ends still remained the dominant repair process. We have also studied the competition between recombination and ligation in the repair of linearized plasmids. Our experimental evidence suggests that recombinational repair is attempted but aborted if only one recombinogenic end with homology to chromosomal DNA is present in plasmid DNA. This situation results in a decreased probability of non-recombinational (i.e. ligation) repair of linearized plasmid DNA.     

Mechanisms of checkpoint kinase Rad53 inactivation after a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, double-strand breaks (DSBs) activate DNA checkpoint pathways that trigger several responses including a strong G(2)/M arrest. We have previously provided evidence that the phosphatases Ptc2 and Ptc3 of the protein phosphatase 2C type are required for DNA checkpoint inactivation after a DSB and probably dephosphorylate the checkpoint kinase Rad53. In this article we have investigated further the interactions between Ptc2 and Rad53. We showed that forkhead-associated domain 1 (FHA1) of Rad53 interacts with a specific threonine of Ptc2, T376, located outside its catalytic domain in a TXXD motif which constitutes an optimal FHA1 binding sequence in vitro. Mutating T376 abolishes Ptc2 interaction with the Rad53 FHA1 domain and results in adaptation and recovery defects following a DSB. We found that Ckb1 and Ckb2, the regulatory subunits of the protein kinase CK2, are necessary for the in vivo interaction between Ptc2 and the Rad53 FHA1 domain, that Ckb1 binds Ptc2 in vitro and that ckb1Delta and ckb2Delta mutants are defective in adaptation and recovery after a DSB. Our data thus strongly suggest that CK2 is the kinase responsible for the in vivo phosphorylation of Ptc2 T376.     

MLH1 and MSH2 promote the symmetry of double-strand break repair events at the HIS4 hotspot in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) initiate meiotic recombination. The DSB repair model predicts that both genetic markers spanning the DSB should be included in heteroduplex DNA and be detectable as non-Mendelian segregations (NMS). In experiments testing this, a significant fraction of events do not conform to this prediction, as only one of the markers displays NMS (one-sided events). Two explanations have been proposed to account for the discrepancies between the predictions and experimental observations. One suggests that two-sided events are the norm but are "hidden" as heteroduplex repair frequently restores the parental configuration of one of the markers. Another explanation posits that one-sided events reflect events in which heteroduplex is formed predominantly on only one side of the DSB. In the absence of heteroduplex repair, the first model predicts that two-sided events would be revealed at the expense of one-sided events, while the second predicts no effect on the distribution of events when heteroduplex repair is lost. We tested these predictions by deleting the DNA mismatch repair genes MSH2 or MLH1 and analyzing the proportion of two-sided events. Unexpectedly, the results do not match the predictions of either model. In both mlh1Delta and msh2Delta, the proportion of two-sided events is significantly decreased relative to wild type. These observations can be explained in one of two ways. Either Msh2p/Mlh1p-independent mispair removal leads to restoration of one of the markers flanking the DSB site or Msh2p/Mlh1p actively promote two-sided events.