Agonist and antagonist-induced qualitative and quantitative alterations of progesterone receptor from breast cancer cells

T47D cells, cultured in medium containing serum stripped of endogenous steroids, proliferate in response to treatment with the progesterone receptor (PR) agonist, R5020 or the PR agonist/antagonist, RU486, whereas the full PR antagonist, ZK98299 has no proliferative effects. Under estrogenized conditions, all of the PR ligands tested inhibit cell growth [23]. In order to determine whether the levels or phosphorylation state of PR are reflected in the growth patterns of T47D cells, we monitored the effects of these PR ligands on the immunoblotted PR band intensities, the relative intensities, of PR-A and PR-B, and their phosphorylation states that are reflected in their altered mobility during SDS-PAGE. Under conditions where the PR ligands inhibit cell proliferation, each ligand had distinctively different qualitative and quantitative effects on PR. Short term treatment of the cells with R5020 or RU486 induced a characteristic phosphorylation-dependent upshift of both PR-A and PR-B. The phosphorylated PR was stable for up to 4 days after treatment of the cells with RU486, but was down regulated between 6-24 h after treatment with R5020. No replenishment of PR in cells treated with R5020 was detected. ZK98299, at concentrations tested, had no qualitative or quantitative effects on PR. Culturing cells for 8 days in medium containing steroid-depleted serum caused a significant reduction in the PR band intensity without causing a change in the ratio of PR-A and PR-B or their phosphorylation states. This decrease in the PR band intensity was reversed by maintaining the cells in 1 nM estrogen, but was potentiated by RU486 or ZK98299. These observations support the view that decreased PR levels may play a role in the stimulatory effects of R5020 and RU486 when cells are cultured under non-estrogenized conditions.     

Characterization of ligand binding,DNA binding and phosphorylation of progesterone receptor by two novel progesterone receptor antagonist ligands

In order to gain a better understanding of the distinctive mechanisms of the various types of antiprogestins, we have characterized in vitro ligand binding, specific DNA binding and phosphorylation of progesterone receptor (PR) from T47D cells after treatment of cells with progestins (progesterone, R5020) and antiprogestins (RU486, ZK98299, Org 31806 and Org 31710). Treatment of the cells with R5020 or PR antagonists, with the exception of ZK98299, resulted in a quantitative upshift of PR-A and PR-B indicative of ligand/DNA-induced phosphorylation of PR. Treatment of cells with RU486, Org 31710 or Org 31806, but not R5020 or ZK98299 resulted in detectable PR-progesterone response element complexes (PR-PREc) as assessed by gel mobility shift assay. Although treatment of cells with ZK98299, a type I PR antagonist, did not induce phosphorylation, the antiprogestins, Org 31806 and Org 31710, in a manner identical to RU486, did. Our data suggest that Org 31806 and Org 31710 affect propertie s of PR from T47D cells that are similar to RU486. (Mol Cell Biochem 175: 205–212, 1997)     

R5020 and RU486 act as progesterone receptor agonists to enhance Sp1/Sp4-dependent gene transcription by an indirect mechanism

It has been suggested that ligand-dependent gene activation by the progesterone receptor (PR) can result from recruitment of PR by the promoter bound Sp1. A detailed investigation of the Sp1-dependent agonistic activity of RU486 and R5020 on the folate receptor (FR) type alpha, p27, thymidine kinase 1 and p21 genes reveals a different mechanism. The FR-alpha P4 promoter and the endogenous FR-alpha gene were up-regulated by the PR agonist R5020 through either PR-A or PR-B. The classical antagonist RU486 also activated the promoter but only through PR-B. The most proximal (essential) G/C-rich (Sp1 binding) element and the initiator region constituted the minimal promoter responsive to PR regulation; substitution with a stronger cluster of G/C-rich elements enhanced the magnitude of the PR response. In contrast, substitution of the G/C-rich element with a TATA box resulted in the loss of regulation by PR. Overexpression of Sp1 and Sp4 but not Sp3 enhanced activation of the FR-alpha promoter by PR, knocking down Sp1 decreased the activation in a manner that was reversed by ectopic Sp1 or Sp4. The ligand-dependent action of PR on the promoter was delayed compared with its activation of a classical glucocorticoid response element-driven promoter and activation of both the promoter and the endogenous FR-alpha gene by PR required new protein synthesis. Activation by PR paralleled RNA polymerase II recruitment but was not accompanied by either association of PR or a change in the association of Sp1 with the endogenous FR-alpha P4 promoter. Similar observations were made for PR regulation of the genes encoding p27, thymidine kinase 1, and p21. The results contradict the current view of Sp1-dependent gene regulation by PR and point to the existence of one or more PR target genes whose promoter and cell context(s) must thus be key determinants of the agonistic activity of RU486 on a large group of important Sp1-dependent downstream target genes.     

Transformation of calf uterine progesterone receptor: analysis of the process when receptor is bound to progesterone and RU38486

Effects of different transforming agents were examined on the sedimentation characteristics of calf uterine progesterone receptor (PR) bound to the synthetic progestin [3H]R5020 or the known progesterone antagonist [3H]RU38486 (RU486). [3H]R5020-receptor complexes [progesterone-receptor complexes (PRc)] sedimented as fast migrating 8S moieties in 8-30% linear glycerol gradients containing 0.15 M KCl and 20 mM Na2MoO4. Incubation of cytosol containing [3H]PRc at 23 degrees C for 10-60 min, or at 0 degrees C with 0.15-0.3 M KCl or 1-10 mM ATP, caused a gradual transformation of PRc to a slow sedimenting 4S form. This 8S to 4S transformation was molybdate sensitive. In contrast, the [3H]RU486-receptor complex exhibited only the 8S form. Treatment with all three activation agents caused a decrease in the 8S form but no concomitant transformation of the [3H]RU486-receptor complex into the 4S form. PR in the calf uterine cytosol incubated at 23 or at 0 degrees C with 0.3 M KCl or 10 mM ATP could be subsequently complexed with [3H]R5020 to yield the 4S form of PR. However, the cytosol PR transformed in the absence of any added ligand failed to bind [3H]RU486. Heat treatment of both [3H]R5020- and [3H]RU486-receptor complexes caused an increase in DNA-cellulose binding, although the extent of this binding was lower when RU486 was bound to receptors. An aqueous two-phase partitioning analysis revealed a significant change in the surface properties of PR following both binding to ligand and subsequent transformation. The partition coefficient (Kobsd) of the heat-transformed [3H]R5020-receptor complex increased about 5-fold over that observed with PR at 0 degrees C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Characterization of R5020 and RU486 binding to progesterone receptor from calf uterus

We have examined and compared the binding characteristics of the progesterone agonist R5020 [promegestone, 17,21-dimethylpregna-4,9(10)-diene-3,20-dione] and the progesterone antagonist RU486 [mifepristone, 17 beta-hydroxy-11 beta-[4-(dimethylamino) phenyl]-17 alpha-(prop-1-ynyl)-estra-4,9-dien-3-one] in calf uterine cytosol. Both steroids bound cytosol macromolecule(s) with high affinity, exhibiting Kd values of 5.6 and 3.6 nM for R5020 and RU486 binding, respectively. The binding of the steroids to the macromolecule(s) was rapid at 4 degrees C, showing saturation of binding sites at 1-2 h for [3H]progesterone and 2-4 h for both [3H]R5020 and [3H]RU486. Addition of molybdate and glycerol to cytosol increased the extent of [3H]R5020 binding. The extent of [3H]RU486 binding remained unchanged in the presence of molybdate, whereas glycerol had an inhibitory effect. Molybdate alone or in combination with glycerol stabilized the [3H]R5020- and [3H]RU486-receptor complexes at 37 degrees C. Although the rate of association of [3H]RU486 with the cytosolic macromolecule was slower than that of [3H]R5020, its dissociation from the ligand-macromolecule complex was significantly slower than [3H]R5020. Competitive steroid binding analysis revealed that [3H]progesterone, [3H]R5020, and [3H]RU486 compete for the same site(s) in the uterine cytosol, suggesting that all three bind to the progesterone receptor (PR). Sedimentation rate analysis showed that both steroids were bound to a molecule that sediments in the 8S region. The 8S [3H]R5020 and [3H]RU486 peaks were abolished by excess radioinert progesterone, RU486, or R5020.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The antiprogesterone RU486 stabilizes the heterooligomeric, non-DNA-binding, 8S-form of the rabbit uterus cytosol progesterone receptor

The salt-induced (0.3 M KCl) transformation of the non-transformed, heterooligomeric 8S-form of the rabbit uterus cytosol progesterone receptor (PR) was analyzed by density gradient ultracentrifugation (8S----4S conversion) and DNA-cellulose chromatography (non-binding----binding forms). After 1 h treatment at 2 C, greater than 90% of agonist (R5020 or Org2058)-PR complexes were transformed, contrary to antagonist (RU486)-PR complexes, which did not undergo any transformation. Thus, there is stabilization of the non-transformed receptor form by RU486 as compared to the effect of agonist binding. The hydrodynamic parameters of both agonist- and antagonist-bound non-transformed receptors were similar and the calculated Mr were approximately 283,000 and approximately 293,000, respectively. In both cases, purification indicated the presence of a 90-kD non-hormone-binding protein associated with the hormone binding unit(s). Transformation of RU486-PR complexes occurred after exposure to high salt at increased temperature and was correlated to the dissociation of the 90-kD protein from the receptor. Both agonist- and antagonist-bound transformed forms of PR had apparent similar affinities for DNA-cellulose. Molybdate-stabilized and KCl-treated RU486-PR complexes were more stable, as assessed by steroid binding, than the corresponding R5020-PR complexes, arguing in favor of a stabilizing effect of both the 90-kD protein and RU486 against inactivation. These cell-free experiments support the concept that RU486 in the rabbit uterus system stabilizes the 8S non-DNA binding, non-transformed form of the receptor at low temperature. The possibility that impaired dissociation of the heterooligomeric receptor form is involved in the antiprogesterone activity of RU486 is discussed.     

Mammalian progesterone receptor shows differential sensitivity to sulfhydryl group modifying agents when bound to agonist and antagonist ligands

Modulation of calf uterine progesterone receptor (PR), in relation to its binding to synthetic steroids with known agonist (R5020) and antagonist (RU486) properties, was studied in the presence of iodoacetamide (IA), N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), beta-mercaptoethanol (MER), and dithiothreitol (DTT). Pretreatment of uterine cytosol at 4 degrees C with NEM (4-10 mM) reduced the binding of [3H]RU486 to PR by 40%, but [3H] R5020 binding was completely abolished. Whereas IA (2-10 mM) treatment did not affect [3H]RU486 binding, [3H]R5020 binding was totally eliminated. DTT or MER increased the binding of both steroids slightly (15%). [3H]R5020- or [3H]RU486-receptor complexes (Rc) migrated in the 8 S region and were eliminated upon pretreatment with NEM. At 23 degrees C, DTT increased the amount of 4 S [3H]R5020-Rc, but had no effect on the [3H]RU486-Rc. In the control, [3H]RU486 binding to the 8 S PR could be competed with radioinert R5020 or RU486, but R5020 failed to compete in the presence of IA. The heat-treated [3H]R5020- and [3H]RU486-Rc showed reduced binding to DNA-cellulose in the presence of NEM and IA. The results of our study suggest that SH group modifications differentially influence the properties of mammalian PR complexed with either R5020 or RU486. In the presence of IA, the [3H]RU486-Rc remained in the 8 S form when incubated at 23 degrees C, indicating that RU486 binding causes conformational changes in PR which are distinct from those that result upon R5020 binding.     

Effects of antiestrogen versus antiprogestin on transformed and nontransformed steroid receptors

In order to determine if different physicochemical properties exist among antihormone-receptor complexes, we have compared the interaction of the antiprogestin RU486 with progesterone receptor (PR) versus the triphenylethylene antiestrogen H1285 (4-(N,N-diethyl-aminoethoxy)-4'-methoxy-alpha-(p-hydroxyphenyl-alp ha'- ethylstilbene] with estrogen receptor (ER) from rabbit uterine tissue. Contrary to other reports, we observed no difference in the sedimentation properties of transformed PR (4S) when bound by the antagonist RU486 versus the progesterone agonist R5020 in either cytosol or DEAE partially-purified receptor preparations analyzed on sucrose gradients containing 0.3 M KCl. In addition, we found no difference in the sedimentation properties of these receptor preparations in the presence of 10 mM sodium molybdate: the nontransformed RU486-PR and nontransformed R5020-PR both sedimented as a 6S species. These same results were obtained when the receptor preparation and gradient analysis were performed in the absence of monothioglycerol. Likewise, there was no change in the sedimentation properties of the transformed PR when the receptor, partially purified in the absence of molybdate, was analyzed on sucrose gradients containing 10 mM sodium molybdate to prevent receptor alteration during centrifugation. From DNA-cellulose assays performed with partially purified PR in the absence of molybdate we determined that the 4S form of R5020-PR and RU486-PR is transformed receptor; whereas in the presence of molybdate, the 6S species is nontransformed. In contrast, we found a different pattern of sedimentation when comparing transformed antiestrogen-receptor complexes with transformed estrogen-receptor complexes. In this case, transformed H1285-ER sedimented as 6S and estradiol-ER sedimented as 4S. We conclude from these experiments that these two antihormones, RU486 and H1285, may have different mechanisms of action in their antagonism of steroid hormone action. Antiestrogen stabilizes the salt-transformed ER as a dimer while antiprogestin appears to permit dissociation of the oligomeric form of the receptor to the monomeric form.     

Antiprogestin-receptor complexes: differences in the interaction of the antiprogestin RU38,486 and the progestin R5020 with the progesterone receptor of human breast cancer cells

In order to understand the molecular basis for antiprogestin action, we have compared the interaction of the antiprogestin [3H]RU38, 486 (RU486) and the progestin [3H]R5020 with the progesterone receptor (PR). In both MCF-7 and T47D human breast cancer cells, we have observed marked differences in the sedimentation properties of the PR on high salt sucrose gradients: while the R5020-receptor complexes sediment at approximately 4 S (4.4 +/- 0.1 S), the RU486-receptor sediments as a prominent 6 S species as well as a 4 S species. This binding is abolished by excess unlabelled R5020, RU486 or progesterone, but is unaffected by excess unlabelled hydrocortisone or dexamethasone, indicating that both the 4 S and 6 S species represent the PR and not glucocorticoid receptor. Although the relative distribution of 4 S and 6 S forms is not altered by treatment with DNAse or RNAse, exposure to 10 mM thioglycerol or to 3 M urea results in conversion of the 6 S to the 4 S form, suggesting that disulfide bonds and hydrophobic interactions are important in maintaining the integrity of the 6 S form. These findings suggest that the 6 S antiprogestin complex is formed as a result of the interaction of PR units with each other or with a different protein. This change in receptor association state may be an important aspect of the antiprogestin activity of RU486.     

Ligands induce conformational changes in the carboxyl-terminus of progesterone receptors which are detected by a site-directed antipeptide monoclonal antibody.

We have prepared a monoclonal antibody, C-262, to a synthetic peptide that contains the carboxy-terminal 14 amino acids from progesterone receptors (PR). This sequence is 100% conserved in all species of PRs that have been cloned to date, suggesting that this antibody will recognize all mammalian and avian PR. The C-262 antibody recognizes both native and denatured forms of the receptor. However, it does not recognize PR when they are bound to the hormone agonists progesterone or R5020. Surprisingly the antibody does recognize PR when they are bound to the steroid antagonist RU486. This suggests that progestin agonists induce a conformational change in the receptor that occludes the C-262 epitope in the carboxyl-terminus, whereas unliganded receptors and receptors bound with RU486 assume distinct conformations that leaves the C-terminal tail accessible to the C-262 antibody.     

Differences in the binding mechanism of RU486 and progesterone to the progesterone receptor

The binding mechanism of the antagonist RU486 to the progesterone receptor was compared with that of the agonists progesterone and R5020. Both progesterone and RU486 bound to the receptor with a Hill coefficient of 1.2, indicating the binding of each ligand is positive cooperative. However, when each ligand was used to compete with [3H]progesterone for binding to the receptor at receptor concentrations near 8 nM, at which the receptor is likely a dimer, the competition curve for RU486 was significantly steeper than the curves for progesterone and R5020 (p less than 0.001). This indicated that a difference in the binding mechanism of RU486 and progesterone can be detected when both ligands are present. In contrast, at receptor concentrations near 1 nM, at which the receptor is likely a monomer, the competition curves for all three ligands were indistinguishable (p = 0.915). These results indicate that RU486 and agonists have different binding mechanisms for the receptor and further suggest that this difference may be related to site-site interactions within the receptor.     

Regulation of progesterone receptor isoforms content in human astrocytoma cell lines

Progesterone regulates several functions through the interaction with its intracellular receptor (PR) which expresses two isoforms with different functions and regulation: PR-A and PR-B. Both PR isoforms have been detected in human astrocytomas, the most common and aggressive primary brain tumours, but their regulation and function are unknown. We studied the effects of estradiol, progesterone and their receptor antagonists (ICI 182,780 and RU 486) on PR isoforms content in U373 and D54 human astrocytoma cell lines, respectively derived from grades III and IV astrocytomas, by Western blot analysis. In U373 cells we also evaluated the effects of PR-A overexpression on cell growth. We observed that in U373 cells estradiol increased the content of both PR isoforms whereas in D54 cells it had no effects. Estradiol effects were blocked by ICI 182,780. In both cell lines, PR isoforms content was down-regulated by progesterone after estradiol treatment. This effect was blocked by RU 486. We observed that overexpression of PR-A significantly diminished the increase in U373 cells number produced after progesterone treatment. Our results suggest a differential PR isoforms regulation depending on the evolution grade of human astrocytoma cells, and an inhibitory role of PR-A on progesterone effects on astrocytomas cell growth.     

Studies of a plasma membrane steroid receptor in Xenopus oocytes using the synthetic progestin RU 486

A steroid binding protein (Mr = 110,000) has previously been identified in the plasma membrane of Xenopus laevis oocytes by photoaffinity labeling with [3H]R5020. In order to further characterize this steroid receptor, the photoaffinity labeled receptor protein was solubilized with 0.1% Brij 35. The solubilized labeled receptor yielded an approximate mol. wt of 102,000 +/- 2,000 by sucrose density gradient centrifugation, suggesting that the solubilized receptor exists as a monomer. RU 486, a synthetic progestin antagonist for mammalian cytosolic receptor systems, inhibited up to 70% of [3H] R5020 photoaffinity binding to the 110,000-Dalton receptor with an IC50 of 5 microM and induced germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) with an EC50 of 9.0 +/- 0.6 microM. GVBD induced by RU 486 was slower than with progesterone, and RU 486 was less powerful than progesterone. Micromolar concentrations of RU 486 also potentiated GVBD induced by sub-optimal concentrations of progesterone or R5020. Furthermore, RU 486 inhibited oocyte plasma membrane adenylate cyclase with an apparent IC50 of 7.5 +/- 2.5 microM. The close correlation of the EC50 value for RU 486 induction of GVBD with the IC50 values for inhibition of [3H]R5020 photoaffinity labeling of the 110,000-Dalton receptor and inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity further supports the physiological significance of the oocyte plasma membrane steroid receptor.     

Role of progesterone receptors during postpartum estrus in rats

We studied the role of progesterone receptor (PR) in the display of female sexual behavior during postpartum estrus in rats. Adult female rats were treated with the PR antagonist, RU486 (1.25 and 5 mg), 3 h after parturition and sexual behavior was evaluated throughout the first postpartum day. Estradiol and progesterone serum levels changed during the first 24 h postpartum. The highest estradiol and progesterone levels were found at 9 and 12 h postpartum, respectively. The predominant PR isoform in the hypothalamus and the preoptic area was PR-A during postpartum day. The content of PR-A increased at 6 h postpartum in the hypothalamus and the preoptic area, and decreased in both regions at 9 h. PR-B content only increased in the preoptic area at 12 h postpartum. The highest display of lordotic and proceptive behaviors were found at 12 h postpartum. The treatment with 1.25 and 5 mg of RU486 respectively reduced lordosis by 61% and 92% at 12 h postpartum. These results suggest that PR is essential in the display of postpartum estrus in rats.     

Novel antiprogestins Org 31806 and 31710: interaction with mammalian progesterone receptor and DNA binding of antisteroid receptor complexes.

We have examined steroid binding parameters and transformation of calf uterine progesterone receptor (PR) liganded with progestins (progesterone and R5020) and the newly synthesized antiprogestins (Org 31806 and 31710). Species specificity analysis indicated that [3H]R5020 binding in the chicken oviduct cytosol could be eliminated in the presence of 100-fold excess radioinert progesterone and R5020 but not Org 31806 and 31710. In the calf uterine cytosol, the progestins and the antiprogestins appeared to interact with the same PR as revealed by the displacement of [3H]R5020 by all of the above steroids. When the extent of [3H]R5020 binding was examined in the presence of different concentrations of radioinert steroids, the relative affinity with which these compounds interacted with the uterine PR was found to be comparable. A 23 degrees C incubation of cytosol transformed the progestin-bound PR complexes increasing their binding to DNA-cellulose from 5 (0 degrees C, nontransformed) to 35%. Under these conditions, 20% Org 31710- and RU486-occupied PR complexes bound to DNA-cellulose whereas only 10% Org 31806-receptor complexes were retained by the resin. Transformation (23 degrees C) of cytosol receptor caused a loss of the larger 8 S form and an increase in the smaller 4 S form. In its unliganded state or when it was complexed with R5020 or the antiprogestins, incubation of PR at 23 degrees C led to dissociation of the receptor-associated 90 kDa heat-shock protein (hsp90). The PR-hsp90 association was stabilized in the presence of 10 mM iodoacetamide when the ligand binding site was occupied by Org 31806 and 31710. The R5020-receptor complexes, however, allowed release of hsp90 under the above transforming conditions. Our results indicate that although Org 31806 and 31710 show no affinity for the avian PR, these steroids interact with the mammalian PR. We propose that the reported antiprogestational effects of Org 31806 and 31710 are mediated via their interaction with PR which appears similar to one that exists between PR and RU486.