Regulation of RNA granules by FMRP and implications for neurological diseases

RNA granule formation, which can be regulated by RNA‐binding proteins (RBPs) such as fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP), acts as a mechanism to control both the repression and subcellular localization of translation. Dysregulated assembly of RNA granules has been implicated in multiple neurological disorders, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Thus, it is crucial to understand the cellular pathways impinging upon granule assembly or disassembly. The goal of this review is to summarize recent advances in our understanding of the role of the RBP, FMRP, in translational repression underlying RNA granule dynamics, mRNA transport and localized. We summarize the known mechanisms of translational regulation by FMRP, the role of FMRP in RNA transport granules, fragile X granules and stress granules. Focusing on the emerging link between FMRP and stress granules, we propose a model for how hyperassembly and hypoassembly of RNA granules may contribute to neurological diseases.     

RNA Granule Assembly and Disassembly Modulated by Nuclear Factor Associated with Double-stranded RNA 2 and Nuclear Factor 45

RNA granules are large messenger ribonucleoprotein complexes that regulate translation and mRNA translocation to control the timing and location of protein synthesis. The regulation of RNA granule assembly and disassembly is a structural basis of translational control, and its disorder is implicated in degenerative disease. Here, we used proteomic analysis to identify proteins associated with RNA granule protein 105 (RNG105)/caprin1, an RNA-binding protein in RNA granules. Among the identified proteins, we focused on nuclear factor (NF) 45 and its binding partner, nuclear factor associated with dsRNA 2 (NFAR2), and we demonstrated that NF45 promotes disassembly of RNA granules, whereas NFAR2 enhances the assembly of RNA granules in cultured cells. The GQSY domain of NFAR2 was required to associate with messenger ribonucleoprotein complexes containing RNG105/caprin1, and it was structurally and functionally related to the low complexity sequence domain of the fused in sarcoma protein, which drives the assembly of RNA granules. Another domain of NFAR2, the DZF domain, was dispensable for association with the RNG105 complex, but it was involved in positive and negative regulation of RNA granule assembly by being phosphorylated at double-stranded RNA-activated kinase sites and by association with NF45, respectively. These results suggest a novel molecular mechanism for the modulation of RNA granule assembly and disassembly by NFAR2, NF45, and phosphorylation at double-stranded RNA-activated kinase PKR sites.     

An mRNA m7G cap binding-like motif within human Ago2 represses translation

microRNAs (miRNAs) bind to Argonaute (Ago) proteins and inhibit translation or promote degradation of mRNA targets. Human let-7 miRNA inhibits translation initiation of mRNA targets in an m(7)G cap-dependent manner and also appears to block protein production, but the molecular mechanism(s) involved is unknown and the role of Ago proteins in translational regulation remains elusive. Here we identify a motif (MC) within the Mid domain of Ago proteins, which bears significant similarity to the m(7)G cap-binding domain of eIF4E, an essential translation initiation factor. We identify conserved aromatic residues within the MC motif of human Ago2 that are required for binding to the m(7)G cap and for translational repression but do not affect the assembly of Ago2 with miRNA or its catalytic activity. We propose that Ago2 represses the initiation of mRNA translation by binding to the m(7)G cap of mRNA targets, thus likely precluding the recruitment of eIF4E.     

CDK1 and calcineurin regulate Maskin association with eIF4E and translational control of cell cycle progression

Maskin regulates assembly of the eIF4F translation initiation complex on messenger RNAs that contain cytoplasmic polyadenylation elements (CPEs) in their 3' untranslated regions. Because Maskin and eIF4G contain similar peptide motifs that bind eIF4E, they compete for occupancy of this factor and consequently control translation. One mRNA that is regulated by Maskin encodes cyclin B1, whose translation oscillates with the early cell cycles of Xenopus laevis embryos. Here we show that Maskin phosphorylation-dephosphorylation also oscillates with the cell cycle and is controlled by the kinase CDK1 and the phosphatase calcineurin. These phosphorylation events control the Maskin-eIF4E interaction and, as a result, translation of cyclin B1 mRNA. Cell cycle progression requires this Maskin-mediated translational regulation.     

Translation initiation and the fate of bacterial mRNAs

Studies in pro- and eukaryotes have revealed that translation can determine the stability of a given messenger RNA. In bacteria, intrinsic mRNA signals can confer efficient ribosome binding, whereas translational feedback inhibition or environmental cues can interfere with this process. Such regulatory mechanisms are often controlled by RNA-binding proteins, small noncoding RNAs and structural rearrangements within the 5' untranslated region. Here, we review molecular events occurring in the 5' untranslated region of primarily Escherichia coli mRNAs with regard to their effects on mRNA stability.     

Information relay from gene to protein: the mRNP connection

Eukaryotic messenger RNAs and their binding proteins are organized into structural units called ribonucleoprotein particles (mRNPs). Some mRNP proteins are ubiquitous, and might bind all mRNAs to ensure efficient translation. Other mRNA proteins, however, are cell-specific and bind only certain mRNAs that display regulated translation. This is particularly evident in early development, where some mRNP particles can be sequestered from the translational apparatus for months before they enter polysomes. Recent investigations suggest that these and other mRNP proteins bind specific sequences and regulate translation.     

Regulated poly(A) tail shortening in somatic cells mediated by cap-proximal translational repressor proteins and ribosome association.

The poly(A) tail plays an important role in translation initiation. We report the identification of a mechanism that operates in mammalian somatic cells, and couples mRNA poly(A) tail length with its translation state. The regulation of human ferritin L-chain mRNA by iron-responsive elements (IREs) and iron regulatory proteins (IRPs) is subject to this mechanism: translational repression imposed by IRP binding to the IRE of ferritin L-chain mRNA induces poly(A) tail shortening. For the accumulation of mRNAs with short poly(A) tails, IRP binding to an IRE per se is not sufficient, but must cause translational repression. Interestingly, puromycin and verrucarin (general translation inhibitors that dissociate mRNAs from ribosomes) mimick the negative effect of the specific translational repressor proteins on poly(A) tail length, whereas cycloheximide and anisomycin (general translation inhibitors that maintain the association between mRNAs and ribosomes) preserve long poly(A) tails. Thus, the ribosome association of the mRNA appears to represent the critical determinant. These findings identify a novel mechanism of regulated polyadenylation as a consequence of translational control. They reveal differences in poly(A) tail metabolism between polysomal and mRNP-associated mRNAs. A possible role of this mechanism in the maintenance of translational repression is discussed.     

Y-box Binding Protein 1: Providing a New Angle on Translational Regulation

Current models of translational regulation are mostly focused on how translational factors engage a messenger mRNA to the ribosome to initiate translation. Since the majority of mRNAs in eukaryotes are translated in a cap-dependent manner, the mRNA 5’ cap-binding protein eIF4E was characterized as a key player responsible for the recruitment of mRNAs to the initiation complex. The availability of eIF4E is believed to be especially critical for translational activation of mRNAs with extensive secondary structures in their 5’UTRs, many of which code for labile regulatory proteins essential for cell growth or viability. Surprisingly, little attention is paid to the other side of translational control, e.g., to define mechanisms responsible for translational silencing and storage of the above messages. In this review, we discuss the possibility that eIF4E per se may not be sufficient to release mRNAs from translational block. We found that many growth- and stress-related mRNAs are associated with the translational repressor YB-1, which can compete with the eIF4E-driven translation initiation complex for binding to the capped 5’ mRNA terminus. Moreover, the cap-dependent repressor activity of YB-1 appears to be negatively regulated via Akt-mediated phosphorylation of the Ser-102 residue of YB-1. Taken together with recent evidence suggesting that translational activation of growth-related messages is a primary cellular response to activation of Ras-Erk and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways, our data suggest that differential expression of specific mRNA subsets is regulated by the PI3K-Akt pathway and achieved via coordinated activation of the components of translational machinery and inactivation of general translational repressors such as YB-1.     

CAR-1 and Trailer hitch: driving mRNP granule function at the ER?

The targeting of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) to specific subcellular sites for local translation plays an important role in diverse cellular and developmental processes in eukaryotes, including axis formation, cell fate determination, spindle pole regulation, cell motility, and neuronal synaptic plasticity. Recently, a new conserved class of Lsm proteins, the Scd6 family, has been implicated in controlling mRNA function. Depletion or mutation of members of the Scd6 family, Caenorhabditis elegans CAR-1 and Drosophila melanogaster trailer hitch, lead to a variety of developmental phenotypes, which in some cases can be linked to alterations in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Scd6/Lsm proteins are RNA binding proteins and are found in RNP complexes associated with translational control of mRNAs, and these complexes can colocalize with the ER. These findings raise the possibility that localization and translational regulation of mRNAs at the ER plays a role in controlling the organization of this organelle.     

Visibly stressed: the role of eIF2, TIA-1, and stress granules in protein translation

Eukaryotic cells express a family of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF2alpha) kinases (eg, PKR, PERK-PEK, GCN2, HRI) that are individually activated in response to distinct types of environmental stress. Phosphorylation of eIF2alpha by one or more of these kinases reduces the concentration of eIF2-guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-transfer ribonucleic acid for methionine (tRNA(Met)), the ternary complex that loads tRNA(Met) onto the small ribosomal subunit to initiate protein translation. When ternary complex levels are reduced, the related RNA-binding proteins TIA-1 and TIAR promote the assembly of a noncanonical preinitiation complex that lacks eIF2-GTP-tRNA(Met). The TIA proteins dynamically sort these translationally incompetent preinitiation complexes into discrete cytoplasmic domains known as stress granules (SGs). RNA-binding proteins that stabilize or destabilize messenger RNA (mRNA) are also recruited to SGs during stress. Thus, TIA-1 and TIAR act downstream of eIF2alpha phosphorylation to promote SG assembly and facilitate mRNA triage during stress. The role of the SG in the integration of translational efficiency, mRNA stability, and the stress response is discussed.