Extension of Drosophila melanogaster life span with a GPCR peptide inhibitor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate signaling from extracellular ligands to intracellular signal transduction proteins. Methuselah (Mth) is a class B (secretin-like) GPCR, a family typified by their large, ligand-binding, N-terminal extracellular domains. Downregulation of mth increases the life span of Drosophila melanogaster; inhibitors of Mth signaling should therefore enhance longevity. We used mRNA display selection to identify high-affinity (K(d) = 15 to 30 nM) peptide ligands that bind to the N-terminal ectodomain of Mth. The selected peptides are potent antagonists of Mth signaling, and structural studies suggest that they perturb the interface between the Mth ecto- and transmembrane domains. Flies constitutively expressing a Mth antagonist peptide have a robust life span extension, which suggests that the peptides inhibit Mth signaling in vivo. Our work thus provides new life span-extending ligands for a metazoan and a general approach for the design of modulators of this important class of GPCRs.     

Turning receptors on and off with intracellular pepducins: new insights into G-protein-coupled receptor drug development

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a large family of remarkably versatile membrane proteins that are attractive therapeutic targets because of their involvement in a vast range of normal physiological processes and pathological diseases. Upon activation, intracellular domains of GPCRs mediate signaling to G-proteins, but these domains have yet to be effectively exploited as drug targets. Cell-penetrating lipidated peptides called pepducins target specific intracellular loops of GPCRs and have recently emerged as effective allosteric modulators of GPCR activity. The lipid moiety facilitates translocation across the plasma membrane, where pepducins then specifically modulate signaling of their cognate receptor. To date, pepducins and related lipopeptides have been shown to specifically modulate the activity of diverse GPCRs and other membrane proteins, including protease-activated receptors (PAR1, PAR2, and PAR4), chemokine receptors (CXCR1, CXCR2, and CXCR4), sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor-3 (S1P3), the melanocortin-4 receptor, the Smoothened receptor, formyl peptide receptor-2 (FPR2), the relaxin receptor (LGR7), G-proteins (Gα(q/11/o/13)), muscarinic acetylcholine receptor and vanilloid (TRPV1) channels, and the GPIIb integrin. This minireview describes recent advances made using pepducin technology in targeting diverse GPCRs and the use of pepducins in identifying potential novel drug targets.     

Identification of functional domains in the formyl peptide receptor-like 1 for agonist-induced cell chemotaxis

Formyl peptide receptor-like 1 (FPRL1) is a seven transmembrane domain, G protein-coupled receptor that interacts with a variety of exogenous and host-derived agonists. In order to identify domains crucial for ligand recognition by FPRL1, we used chimeric receptors with segments in FPRL1 replaced by corresponding amino acid sequences derived from the prototype formyl peptide receptor FPR. The chimeric receptors were stably transfected into human embryonic kidney epithelial cells and the capacity of the cells to migrate in response to formyl peptide receptor agonists was evaluated. Our results showed that multiple domains in FPRL1 are involved in the receptor response to chemotactic agonists with the sixth transmembrane domain and the third extracellular loop playing a prominent role. Interestingly, the N-terminus and a segment between the fourth transmembrane domain and the third intracellular loop of FPRL1 are important for receptor interaction with a 42 amino acid amyloid beta peptide (Abeta42), an Alzheimer's disease-associated FPRL1 agonist, but not with MMK-1, a synthetic FPRL1 agonist, suggesting that diverse agonists may use different domains in FPRL1. Considering the potential importance of FPRL1 in inflammation and neurodegenerative diseases, the identification of functional domains in this receptor will provide valuable information for the design of specific receptor antagonists.     

Elucidation of the role of peptide linker in calcium-sensing receptor activation process

Family 3 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which includes metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), sweet and "umami" taste receptors (T1Rs), and the extracellular calcium-sensing receptor (CaR), represent a distinct group among the superfamily of GPCRs characterized by large amino-terminal extracellular ligand-binding domains (ECD) with homology to bacterial periplasmic amino acid-binding proteins that are responsible for signal detection and receptor activation through as yet unresolved mechanism(s) via the seven-transmembrane helical domain (7TMD) common to all GPCRs. To address the mechanism(s) by which ligand-induced conformational changes are conveyed from the ECD to the 7TMD for G-protein activation, we altered the length and composition of a 14-amino acid linker segment common to all family 3 GPCRs except GABA(B) receptor, in the CaR by insertion, deletion, and site-directed mutagenesis of specific highly conserved residues. Small alterations in the length and composition of the linker impaired cell surface expression and abrogated signaling of the chimeric receptors. The exchange of nine amino acids within the linker of CaR with the homologous sequence of mGluR1, however, preserved receptor function. Ala substitution for the four highly conserved residues within this amino acid sequence identified a Leu at position 606 of the CaR critical for cell surface expression and signaling. Substitution of Leu(606) for Ala resulted in impaired cell surface expression. However, Ile and Val substitutions displayed strong activating phenotypes. Disruption of the linker by insertion of nine amino acids of a random-coiled structure uncoupled the ECD from regulating the 7TMD. These data are consistent with a model of receptor activation in which the peptide linker, and particularly Leu(606), provides a critical interaction for the CaR signal transmission, a finding likely to be relevant for all family 3 GPCRs containing this conserved motif.     

An expression and purification system for the biosynthesis of adenosine receptor peptides for biophysical and structural characterization

Biophysical and structural characterization of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has been limited due to difficulties in expression, purification, and vitro stability of the full-length receptors. "Divide and conquer" approaches aimed at the NMR characterization of peptides corresponding to specific regions of the receptor have yielded insights into the structure and dynamics of GPCR activation and signaling. Though significant progress has been made in the generation of peptides that are composed of GPCR transmembrane domains, current methods utilize fusion protein strategies that require chemical cleavage and peptide separation via chromatographic means. We have developed an expression and purification system based on fusion to ketosteroid isomerase, thrombin cleavage, and tandem affinity chromatography that enables the solubilization, cleavage, and characterization in a single detergent system relevant for biophysical and structural characterization. We have applied this expression and purification system to the production and characterization of peptides of the adenosine receptor family of GPCRs in Escherichia coli. Herein, we demonstrate using a model peptide that includes extracellular loop 3, transmembrane domain 7, and a portion of the carboxy-terminus of the adenosine A(2)a receptor that the peptide is sufficiently pure for biophysical characterization, where it adopts α-helical structure. Furthermore, we demonstrate the utility of this system by optimizing the construct for thrombin processing and apply the system to peptides with more complex structures.     

Two motifs within a transmembrane domain, one for homodimerization and the other for heterodimerization

Protein assembly is a critical process involved in a wide range of cellular events and occurs through extracellular and/or transmembrane domains (TMs). Previous studies demonstrated that a GXXXG motif is crucial for homodimer formation. Here we selected the TMs of ErbB1 and ErbB2 as a model since these receptors function both as homodimers and as heterodimers. Both TMs contain two GXXXG-like motifs located at the C and N termini. The C-terminal motifs were implicated previously in homodimer formation, but the role of the N-terminal motifs was not clear. We used the ToxR system and expressed the TMs of both ErbB1 and ErbB2 containing only the N-terminal GXXXG motifs. The data revealed that the ErbB2 but not the ErbB1 construct formed homodimers. Importantly, a synthetic ErbB1 TM peptide was able to form a heterodimer with ErbB2, by displacing the ErbB2 TM homodimer. The specificity of the interaction was demonstrated by using three controls: (i) Two single mutations within the GXXXG-like motif of the ErbB1 peptide reduced or preserved its activity, in agreement with similar mutations in glycophorin A. (ii) A TM peptide of the bacterial Tar receptor did not assemble with the ErbB2 construct. (iii) The ErbB1 peptide had no effect on the dimerization of a construct containing the TM-1 domain of the Tar receptor. Fluorescence microscopy demonstrated that all the peptides localized on the membrane. Furthermore, incubation with the peptides had no effect on bacterial growth and protein expression levels. Our results suggest that the N-terminal GXXXG-like motif of the ErbB1 TM plays a role in heterodimerization with the ErbB2 transmembrane domain. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of a transmembrane domain with two distinct recognition motifs, one for homodimerization and the other for heterodimerization.     

Peptide interactions with G-protein coupled receptors.

Peptide recognition by G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is reviewed with an emphasis on the indirect approach used to determine the receptor-bound conformation of peptide ligands. This approach was developed in response to the lack of detailed structural information available for these receptors. Recent advances in the structural determination of rhodopsin (the GPCR of the visual system) by crystallography have provided a scaffold for homology modeling of the inactive state of a wide variety of GPCRs that interact with peptide messages. Additionally, the ability to mutate GPCRs and assay compounds of similar chemical structure to test a common binding site on the receptor provides a firm experimental basis for structure-activity studies. Recognition motifs, common in other well-studied systems such as proteolytic enzymes and major histocompatibility class receptors (MHC) are reviewed briefly to provide a basis of comparison. Finally, the development of true peptidomimetics is contrasted with nonpeptide ligands, discovered through combinatorial chemistry. In many systems, the evidence suggests that the peptide ligands bind at the interface between the transmembrane segments and the extracellular loops, while nonpeptide antagonists bind within the transmembrane segments. Plausible models of GPCRs and the mechanism by which they activate G-proteins on binding peptides are beginning to emerge.     

Role of extracellular domains in PBAN/pyrokinin GPCRs from insects using chimera receptors

Pheromone biosynthesis-activating neuropeptide (PBAN) is a peptide used by a variety of moths to regulate pheromone production. Pyrokinins are peptides that activate muscle contraction in a variety of insects. These peptides have a common FXPRLamide C-terminal ending that is required for activity. Receptors have been identified from a moth and Drosophila as belonging to the rhodopsin family of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) with sequence similarity to neuromedin U receptors from vertebrates. No insect GPCR has been characterized with regard to role of extracellular domains required for peptide binding and receptor activation. To begin characterizing these GPCRs we created chimera receptors using a PBAN-receptor from a moth and pyrokinin-receptors from Drosophila where extracellular domains were swapped. The N-terminal of the moth GPCR has two N-glycosylation sites that when replaced with glutamines, activity was reduced but not absent, indicating these sites contribute to receptor stability. Activity was greatly reduced by replacing the 2nd extracellular loop that has an N-glycosylation site and a cysteine that can form a disulfide bridge with a cysteine at the beginning of the 3rd transmembrane domain. Exchange of the 3rd extracellular loop between the moth and Drosophila receptor resulted in differential activation by PBAN or a diapause hormone peptide. This result indicates that the 3rd extracellular loop is directly involved in peptide ligand recognition. Results are discussed in context of the structural features of insect GPCRs that are required for receptor activation as compared to vertebrate receptors.     

Oligomerization, biogenesis, and signaling is promoted by a glycophorin A-like dimerization motif in transmembrane domain 1 of a yeast G protein-coupled receptor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can form dimeric or oligomeric complexes in vivo. However, the functions and mechanisms of oligomerization remain poorly understood for most GPCRs, including the alpha-factor receptor (STE2 gene product) of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Here we provide evidence indicating that alpha-factor receptor oligomerization involves a GXXXG motif in the first transmembrane domain (TM1), similar to the transmembrane dimerization domain of glycophorin A. Results of fluorescence resonance energy transfer, fluorescence microscopy, endocytosis assays of receptor oligomerization in living cells, and agonist binding assays indicated that amino acid substitutions affecting the glycine residues of the GXXXG motif impaired alpha-factor receptor oligomerization and biogenesis in vivo but did not significantly impair agonist binding affinity. Mutant receptors exhibited signaling defects that were not due to impaired cell surface expression, indicating that oligomerization promotes alpha-factor receptor signal transduction. Structure-function studies suggested that the GXXXG motif in TM1 of the alpha-factor receptor promotes oligomerization by a mechanism similar to that used by the GXXXG dimerization motif of glycophorin A. In many mammalian GPCRs, motifs related to the GXXXG sequence are present in TM1 or other TM domains, suggesting that similar mechanisms are used by many GPCRs to form dimers or oligomeric arrays.     

Influence of oligomerization on the dynamics of G-protein coupled receptors as assessed by normal mode analysis

The recently discovered impact of oligomerization on G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) function further complicates the already challenging goal of unraveling the molecular and dynamic mechanisms of these receptors. To help understand the effect of oligomerization on the dynamics of GPCRs, we have compared the motion of monomeric, dimeric, and tetrameric arrangements of the prototypic GPCR rhodopsin, using an approximate-yet powerful-normal mode analysis (NMA) technique termed elastic network model (ENM). Moreover, we have used ENM to discriminate between putative dynamic mechanisms likely to account for the recently observed conformational rearrangement of the TM4,5-TM4,5 dimerization interface of GPCRs that occurs upon activation. Our results indicate: (1) significant perturbation of the normal modes (NMs) of the rhodopsin monomer upon oligomerization, which is mainly manifested at interfacial regions; (2) increased positive correlation among the transmembrane domains (TMs) and between the extracellular loop (EL) and TM regions of the rhodopsin protomer; (3) highest interresidue positive correlation at the interfaces between protomers; and (4) experimentally testable hypotheses of differential motional changes within different putative oligomeric arrangements.     

Site-directed mutagenesis and PBAN activation of the Helicoverpa zea PBAN-receptor

Pheromone biosynthesis-activating neuropeptide (PBAN) and pyrokinins belong to a family of insect peptide hormones that have a common FXPRLamide C-terminal ending. The G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) for this peptide family were first identified from a moth and Drosophila with sequence similarity to neuromedin U receptors from vertebrates. We have characterized the PBAN-receptor (PBAN-R or PR) active binding domains using chimeric GPCRs and proposed that extracellular loop 3 is critical for ligand selection. Here, we characterized the 3rd extracellular domain of PBAN-R through site-directed point mutations. Results are discussed in context of the structural features required for receptor activation using receptor activation experiments and in silico computational modeling. This research will help in characterizing these receptors towards a goal of finding agonists and/or antagonists for PBAN/pyrokinin receptors.     

Extracellular loops 1 and 3 and their associated transmembrane regions of the calcitonin receptor-like receptor are needed for CGRP receptor function

The first and third extracellular loops (ECL) of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been implicated in ligand binding and receptor function. This study describes the results of an alanine/leucine scan of ECLs 1 and 3 and loop-associated transmembrane (TM) domains of the secretin-like GPCR calcitonin receptor-like receptor which associates with receptor activity modifying protein 1 to form the CGRP receptor. Leu195Ala, Val198Ala and Ala199Leu at the top of TM2 all reduced αCGRP-mediated cAMP production and internalization; Leu195Ala and Ala199Leu also reduced αCGRP binding. These residues form a hydrophobic cluster within an area defined as the “minor groove” of rhodopsin-like GPCRs. Within ECL1, Ala203Leu and Ala206Leu influenced the ability of αCGRP to stimulate adenylate cyclase. In TM3, His219Ala, Leu220Ala and Leu222Ala have influences on αCGRP binding and cAMP production; they are likely to indirectly influence the binding site for αCGRP as well as having an involvement in signal transduction. On the exofacial surfaces of TMs 6 and 7, a number of residues were identified that reduced cell surface receptor expression, most noticeably Leu351Ala and Glu357Ala in TM6. The residues may contribute to the RAMP1 binding interface. Ile360Ala impaired αCGRP-mediated cAMP production. Ile360 is predicted to be located close to ECL2 and may facilitate receptor activation. Identification of several crucial functional loci gives further insight into the activation mechanism of this complex receptor system and may aid rational drug design.     

Constitutive activation of A(3) adenosine receptors by site-directed mutagenesis

The objective of this study was to create constitutively active mutant human A(3) adenosine receptors (ARs) using single amino acid replacements, based on findings from other G protein-coupled receptors. A(3) ARs mutated in transmembrane helical domains (TMs) 1, 3, 6, and 7 were expressed in COS-7 cells and subjected to agonist radioligand binding and phospholipase C (PLC) and adenylyl cyclase (AC) assays. Three mutant receptors, A229E in TM6 and R108A and R108K in the DRY motif of TM3, were found to be constitutively active in both functional assays. The potency of the A(3) agonist Cl-IB-MECA (1-chloro-N(6)-(3-iodobenzyl)adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide) in PLC activation was enhanced by at least an order of magnitude over wild type (EC(50) 951 nM) in R108A and A229E mutant receptors. Cl-IB-MECA was much less potent (>10-fold) in C88F, Y109F, and Y282F and mutants or inactive following double mutation of the DRY motif. The degree of constitutive activation was more pronounced for the AC signaling pathway than for the PLC signaling pathway. The results indicated that specific locations within the TMs proximal to the cytosolic region were responsible for constraining the receptor in a G protein-uncoupled conformation.     

Ligand-mimicking Receptor Variant Discloses Binding and Activation Mode of Prolactin-releasing Peptide

The prolactin-releasing peptide receptor and its bioactive RF-amide peptide (PrRP20) have been investigated to explore the ligand binding mode of peptide G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). By receptor mutagenesis, we identified the conserved aspartate in the upper transmembrane helix 6 (Asp(6.59)) of the receptor as the first position that directly interacts with arginine 19 of the ligand (Arg(19)). Replacement of Asp(6.59) with Arg(19) of PrRP20 led to D6.59R, which turned out to be a constitutively active receptor mutant (CAM). This suggests that the mutated residue at the top of transmembrane helix 6 mimics Arg(19) by interacting with additional binding partners in the receptor. Next, we generated an initial comparative model of this CAM because no ligand docking was required, and we selected the next set of receptor mutants to find the engaged partners of the binding pocket. In an iterative process, we identified two acidic residues and two hydrophobic residues that form the peptide ligand binding pocket. As all residues are localized on top or in the upper part of the transmembrane domains, we clearly can show that the extracellular surface of the receptor is sufficient for full signal transduction for prolactin-releasing peptide, rather than a deep, membrane-embedded binding pocket. This contributes to the knowledge of the binding of peptide ligands to GPCRs and might facilitate the development of GPCR ligands, but it also provides new targeting of CAMs involved in hereditary diseases.     

A microdomain formed by the extracellular ends of the transmembrane domains promotes activation of the G protein-coupled alpha-factor receptor

The alpha-factor receptor (Ste2p) that promotes mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is similar to other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in that it contains seven transmembrane domains. Previous studies suggested that the extracellular ends of the transmembrane domains are important for Ste2p function, so a systematic scanning mutagenesis was carried out in which 46 residues near the ends of transmembrane domains 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 were replaced with cysteine. These mutants complement mutations constructed previously near the ends of transmembrane domains 5 and 6 to analyze all the extracellular ends. Eight new mutants created in this study were partially defective in signaling (V45C, N46C, T50C, A52C, L102C, N105C, L277C, and A281C). Treatment with 2-([biotinoyl] amino) ethyl methanethiosulfonate, a thiol-specific reagent that reacts with accessible cysteine residues but not membrane-embedded cysteines, identified a drop in the level of reactivity over a consecutive series of residues that was inferred to be the membrane boundary. An unusual prolonged zone of intermediate reactivity near the extracellular end of transmembrane domain 2 suggests that this region may adopt a special structure. Interestingly, residues implicated in ligand binding were mainly accessible, whereas residues involved in the subsequent step of promoting receptor activation were mainly inaccessible. These results define a receptor microdomain that provides an important framework for interpreting the mechanisms by which functionally important residues contribute to ligand binding and activation of Ste2p and other GPCRs.     

A robust antibody discovery platform for difficult-to-express G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are in the spotlight as drug targets due to the fact that multiple research results have verified the correlation between the activation of GPCRs and disease indications. This is because the GPCRs are present across the cell membranes, which interact with either extracellular ligands or other types of compartments and simultaneously mediate intracellular signaling. Despite the importance of the GPCRs as drug targets, they are too difficult to express in soluble forms. Currently, the difficulty of preparing functional GPCRs and the lack of efficient antibody screening methods are the most challenging steps in the discovery of antibodies targeting GPCRs. In this study, we developed a powerful platform that facilitates isolating GPCR-specific antibodies by obviating difficulties in GPCR preparation. The strategies include (i) conjugation of the P9 peptide, an envelope protein of Pseudomonas phi6, to the N-terminus of GPCRs to improve the expression level of the GPCRs in Escherichia coli, (ii) stabilization of the GPCRs in their active forms with amphiphilic poly-γ-glutamate (APG) to shield the seven hydrophobic transmembrane domains, and (iii) further limiting the size of the APG complex to improve the chance to isolate antibodies targeting the proteins-of-interest. Capitalizing on the above strategies, we could prepare GPCR proteins in their active forms as facile as other general-soluble antigen proteins. Furthermore, this protocol was validated to be successful in discovering three individual GPCR-specific antibodies targeting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4, and prostaglandin E2 receptor 4 in this study.     

DEP-domain-mediated regulation of GPCR signaling responses

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate cellular responses to a variety of stimuli, but how specific responses are regulated has been elusive, as the types of GPCRs vastly outnumber the classes of G protein heterotrimers available to initiate downstream signaling. In our analysis of signaling proteins containing DEP domains ( approximately 90 residue sequence motifs first recognized in fly Dishevelled, worm EGL-10, and mammalian Pleckstrin), we find that DEP domains are responsible for specific recognition of GPCRs. We examined the yeast regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) protein Sst2 and demonstrate that the DEP domains in Sst2 mediate binding to its cognate GPCR (Ste2). DEP-domain-mediated tethering promotes downregulation by placing the RGS protein in proximity to its substrate (receptor-activated Galpha subunit). Sst2 docks to the Ste2 cytosolic tail, but only its unphosphorylated state, allowing for release and recycling of this regulator upon receptor desensitization and internalization. DEP-domain-mediated targeting of effectors and regulators to specific GPCRs provides a means to dictate the nature, duration, and specificity of the response.     

A unique hormonal recognition feature of the human glucagon-like peptide-2 receptor

Glucagon-like peptides (GLP-1 and GLP-2) are two proglucagon-derived intestinal hormones that mediate distinct physiological functions through two related receptors (GLP-1R and GLP-2R) which are important drug targets for metabolic disorders and Crohn’s disease, respectively. Despite great progress in GLP-1R structure determination, our understanding on the differences of peptide binding and signal transduction between these two receptors remains elusive. Here we report the electron microscopy structure of the human GLP-2R in complex with GLP-2 and a G_s heterotrimer. To accommodate GLP-2 rather than GLP-1, GLP-2R fine-tunes the conformations of the extracellular parts of transmembrane helices (TMs) 1, 5, 7 and extracellular loop 1 (ECL1). In contrast to GLP-1, the N-terminal histidine of GLP-2 penetrates into the receptor core with a unique orientation. The middle region of GLP-2 engages with TM1 and TM7 more extensively than with ECL2, and the GLP-2 C-terminus closely attaches to ECL1, which is the most protruded among 9 class B G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Functional studies revealed that the above three segments of GLP-2 are essential for GLP-2 recognition and receptor activation, especially the middle region. These results provide new insights into the molecular basis of ligand specificity in class B GPCRs and may facilitate the development of more specific therapeutics.Subject terms: Cryoelectron microscopy, Hormone receptors     

Subunits of a yeast oligomeric G protein-coupled receptor are activated independently by agonist but function in concert to activate G protein heterotrimers

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) form dimeric or oligomeric complexes in vivo. However, the function of oligomerization in receptor-mediated G protein activation is unclear. Previous studies of the yeast alpha-factor receptor (STE2 gene product) have indicated that oligomerization promotes signaling. Here we have addressed the mechanism by which oligomerization facilitates G protein signaling by examining the ability of ligand binding- and G protein coupling-defective alpha-factor receptors to form complexes in vivo and to correct their signaling defects when co-expressed (trans complementation). Newly and previously identified receptor mutants indicated that ligand binding involves the exofacial end of transmembrane domain (TM) 4, whereas G protein coupling involves ic1, ic3, the C-terminal tail, and the intracellular ends of TM2 and TM3. Mutant receptors bearing substitutions in these domains formed homo-oligomeric or hetero-oligomeric complexes in vivo, as indicated by results of fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments. Co-expression of ligand binding- and G protein coupling-defective mutant receptors did not significantly improve signaling. In contrast, co-expression of ic1 and ic3 mutations in trans but not in cis significantly increased signaling efficiency. Therefore, we suggest that subunits of the alpha-factor receptor: 1) are activated independently rather than cooperatively by agonist, and 2) function in a concerted fashion to promote G protein activation, possibly by contacting different subunits or regions of the G protein heterotrimer.     

The neurokinin-1 and neurokinin-2 receptor binding sites of MDL103,392 differ

Several small molecule non-peptide antagonists of the NK-1 and NK-2 receptors have been developed. Mutational analysis of the receptor protein sequence has led to the conclusion that the binding site for these non-peptide antagonists lies within the bundle created by transmembrane domains IV–VII of the receptor and differs from the binding sites of peptide agonists and antagonists. The current investigation uses site-directed mutagenesis of the NK-1 and NK-2 receptors to elucidate the amino acids that are important for binding and functional activity of the first potent dual NK-1/NK-2 antagonist MDL103,392. The amino acids found to be important for MDL103,392 binding to the NK-1 receptor are Gln-165, His-197, Leu-203, Ile-204, Phe-264, His-265 and Tyr-272. The amino acids found to be important for MDL103,392 binding to the NK-2 receptor are Gln-166, His-198, Tyr-266 and Tyr-289. While residues in transmembrane (TM) domains IV and V are important in both receptors (Gln-165/166 and His-197/198), residues in TM V and VI are more important for the NK-1 receptor and residues in TM VII play a more important role in the NK-2 receptor. These data are the first report of the analysis of the binding site of a dual tachykinin receptor antagonist and indicate that a single compound (MDL103,392) binds to each receptor in a different manner despite there being a high degree of homology in the transmembrane bundles. In addition, this is the first report in which a model for the binding of a non-peptide antagonist to the NK-2 receptor is proposed.