Lbx1 is required for muscle precursor migration along a lateral pathway into the limb

In mammalian embryos, myogenic precursor cells emigrate from the ventral lip of the dermomyotome and colonize the limbs, tongue and diaphragm where they differentiate and form skeletal muscle. Previous studies have shown that Pax3, together with the c-Met receptor tyrosine kinase and its ligand Scatter Factor (SF) are necessary for the migration of hypaxial muscle precursors in mice. Lbx1 and Pax3 are co-expressed in all migrating hypaxial muscle precursors, raising the possibility that Lbx1 regulates their migration. To examine the function of Lbx1 in muscle development, we inactivated the Lbx1 gene by homologous recombination. Mice lacking Lbx1 exhibit an extensive loss of limb muscles, although some forelimb and hindlimb muscles are still present. The pattern of muscle loss suggests that Lbx1 is not required for the specification of particular limb muscles, and the muscle defects that occur in Lbx1(-/-) mice can be solely attributed to changes in muscle precursor migration. c-Met is expressed in Lbx1 mutant mice and limb muscle precursors delaminate from the ventral dermomyotome but fail to migrate laterally into the limb. Muscle precursors still migrate ventrally and give rise to tongue, diaphragm and some limb muscles, demonstrating Lbx1 is necessary for the lateral, but not ventral, migration of hypaxial muscle precursors. These results suggest that Lbx1 regulates responsiveness to a lateral migration signal which emanates from the developing limb.     

Genes that control the development of migrating muscle precursor cells

Skeletal muscles in vertebrates, despite their functional and biochemical similarities, are generated via diverse developmental mechanisms. A major subclass of hypaxial muscle groups is derived from long-range migrating progenitor cells that delaminate from the dermomyotome. The development of this lineage is controlled by Pax3, the c-Met tyrosine kinase receptor, its ligand SF/HGF (scatter factor/hepatocyte growth factor) and the homeobox factor Lbx1. These molecules are essential for establishment of the precursor pool, delamination, migration and target finding. Progress has been made in understanding patterning of the muscles, which requires a precise control of proliferation and differentiation of myogenic precursor cells.     

The role of SF/HGF and c-Met in the development of skeletal muscle

Hypaxial skeletal muscles develop from migratory and non-migratory precursor cells that are generated by the lateral lip of the dermomyotome. Previous work shows that the formation of migratory precursors requires the c-Met and SF/HGF genes. We show here that in mice lacking c-Met or SF/HGF, the initial development of the dermomyotome proceeds appropriately and growth and survival of cells in the dermomyotome are not affected. Migratory precursors are also correctly specified, as monitored by the expression of Lbx1. However, these cells remain aggregated and fail to take up long range migration. We conclude that parallel but independent cues converge on the migratory hypaxial precursors in the dermomyotomal lip after they are laid down: a signal given by SF/HGF that controls the emigration of the precursors, and an as yet unidentified signal that controls Lbx1. SF/HGF and c-Met act in a paracrine manner to control emigration, and migratory cells only dissociate from somites located close to SF/HGF-expressing cells. During long range migration, prolonged receptor-ligand-interaction appears to be required, as SF/HGF is expressed both along the routes and at the target sites of migratory myogenic progenitors. Mice that lack c-Met die during the second part of gestation due to a placental defect. Rescue of the placental defect by aggregation of tetraploid (wild type) and diploid (c-Met-/-) morulae allows development of c-Met mutant animals to term. They lack muscle groups that derive from migratory precursor cells, but display otherwise normal skeletal musculature.     

Expression of lbx1 involved in the hypaxial musculature formation of the mouse embryo

Somites are the source of hypaxial musculature including skeletal muscles of the limb, tongue, and trunk. To get insight into the function of mouse Lbx1 homeobox gene in early somitic mesoderm differentiation, in situ hybridization analyses were performed. At the 4-6 somite stage (8 dpc), Lbx1 was first expressed in the lateral portion of the epithelial somite and dermomyotomal epithelium. This was in contrast to the expression of myf-5 in the medial region of the somite. The lateral expression of Lbx1 in somitic mesoderm then occurred regionally along the anterior-posterior body axis. Later, at 10 dpc (stage 1 of limb bud development), Lbx1-positive migrating cells originated in the lateral dermomyotomal lips at occipital, forelimb, and hindlimb levels. They also expressed Pax-3 and c-met, known as markers of the migrating limb muscle precursor cells. In stage 4 hindlimb bud (11.5 dpc), the dorsal and ventral muscle precursor populations expressed Lbx1. In stage 8 forelimb buds (12.5 dpc), Lbx1 expression was reduced in the proximal muscle masses, where the high expression of myogenin accompanying muscle differentiation was detected. These results suggest that mouse Lbx1 might be involved in the commitment or determination of a muscle cell subpopulation during hypaxial musculature development. J. Exp. Zool. 286:270-279, 2000.     

Involvement of HGF/MET signaling in appendicular muscle development in cartilaginous fish

In amniotes, limb muscle precursors de-epithelialize from the ventral dermomyotome and individually migrate into limb buds. In catsharks, Scyliorhinus, fin muscle precursors are also derived from the ventral dermomyotome, but shortly after de-epithelialization, they reaggregate within the pectoral fin bud and differentiate into fin muscles. Delamination of muscle precursors has been suggested to be controlled by hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and its tyrosine kinase receptor (MET) in amniotes. Here, we explore the possibility that HGF/MET signaling regulates the delamination of appendicular muscle precursors in embryos of the catshark Scyliorhinus canicula. Our analysis reveals that Hgf is expressed in pectoral fin buds, whereas c-Met expression in fin muscle precursors is rapidly downregulated. We propose that alteration of the duration of c-Met expression in appendicular muscle precursors might underlie the evolution of individually migrating muscle precursors, which leads to the emergence of complex appendicular muscular systems in amniotes.     

Overexpression of Kelch domain containing-2 (mKlhdc2) inhibits differentiation and directed migration of C2C12 myoblasts

Targeted migration of muscle precursor cells to the anlagen of limb muscles is a complex process, which is only partially understood. We have used Lbx1 mutant mice, which are unable to establish correct migration paths of muscle precursor cells into the limbs to identify new genes involved in the accurate placement of myogenic cells in developing muscles. We found that mKlhdc2 (Kelch domain containing-2), a novel member of the family of Kelch domain containing proteins, is significantly downregulated in Lbx1 homozygous mutant embryos. Functional characterization of mKlhdc2 by targeted overexpression in 10T1/2 fibroblasts and C2C12 muscle cells rendered these cells unable to respond to chemoattractants such as HGF. Furthermore, C2C12 myoblasts overexpressing mKlhdc2 display altered cellular morphology and are unable to differentiate into mature myotubes. Our results suggest that a tightly controlled expression of mKlhdc2 is essential for a faithful execution of the myogenic differentiation and migration program.     

Relationship between Neural Crest Cells and Cranial Mesoderm during Head Muscle Development

Background

In vertebrates, the skeletal elements of the jaw, together with the connective tissues and tendons, originate from neural crest cells, while the associated muscles derive mainly from cranial mesoderm. Previous studies have shown that neural crest cells migrate in close association with cranial mesoderm and then circumscribe but do not penetrate the core of muscle precursor cells of the branchial arches at early stages of development, thus defining a sharp boundary between neural crest cells and mesodermal muscle progenitor cells. Tendons constitute one of the neural crest derivatives likely to interact with muscle formation. However, head tendon formation has not been studied, nor have tendon and muscle interactions in the head.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Reinvestigation of the relationship between cranial neural crest cells and muscle precursor cells during development of the first branchial arch, using quail/chick chimeras and molecular markers revealed several novel features concerning the interface between neural crest cells and mesoderm. We observed that neural crest cells migrate into the cephalic mesoderm containing myogenic precursor cells, leading to the presence of neural crest cells inside the mesodermal core of the first branchial arch. We have also established that all the forming tendons associated with branchiomeric and eye muscles are of neural crest origin and express the Scleraxis marker in chick and mouse embryos. Moreover, analysis of Scleraxis expression in the absence of branchiomeric muscles in Tbx1^−/− mutant mice, showed that muscles are not necessary for the initiation of tendon formation but are required for further tendon development.

Conclusions/Significance

This results show that neural crest cells and muscle progenitor cells are more extensively mixed than previously believed during arch development. In addition, our results show that interactions between muscles and tendons during craniofacial development are similar to those observed in the limb, despite the distinct embryological origin of these cell types in the head.     

Spatial and temporal contribution of somitic myoblasts to avian hind limb muscles

Skeletal muscles of the avian limb are derived from mononucleated myogenic precursor cells (myoblasts) that migrate into the somatopleural mesoderm of the developing limb bud from the ventrolateral dermomyotome of limb adjacent somites. In the present study, we utilized replication-deficient lacZ-encoding retroviruses to elucidate the source of myoblasts for all hind limb muscles in the chick and define the distinct patterns of myoblast distribution within the limb. We also examined, using the same marker, whether the time of migration from the somites into the limb dictates the spatial contribution the myoblasts make to the developing musculature, particularly in relation to the proximodistal and dorsovental axes. Finally, we used these investigations to examine whether the precursors of both primary and secondary myotubes are derived from somitic mesoderm, a presumption, which up until now, has not been demonstrated in vivo. Overall, the results of our studies demonstrate that individual somites have a selective spatial pattern of participation in the development of the avian hind limb musculature and contribute to both primary and secondary myotubes. We also show that both early and later migrating myoblasts can contribute fully to the formation of the appendicular muscles.     

MyoD and Myf-5 define the specification of musculature of distinct embryonic origin.

Mounting evidence supports the notion that Myf-5 and MyoD play unique roles in the development of epaxial (originating in the dorso-medial half of the somite, e.g. back muscles) and hypaxial (originating in the ventro-lateral half of the somite, e.g. limb and body wall muscles) musculature. To further understand how Myf-5 and MyoD genes cooperate during skeletal muscle specification, we examined and compared the expression pattern of MyoD-lacZ (258/2.5lacZ and MD6.0-lacZ) transgenes in wild-type, Myf-5, and MyoD mutant embryos. We found that the delayed onset of muscle differentiation in the branchial arches, tongue, limbs, and diaphragm of MyoD-/- embryos was a consequence of a reduced ability of myogenic precursor cells to progress through their normal developmental program and not because of a defect in migration of muscle progenitor cells into these regions. We also found that myogenic precursor cells for back, intercostal, and abdominal wall musculature in Myf-54-/- embryos failed to undergo normal translocation or differentiation. By contrast, the myogenic precursors of intercostal and abdominal wall musculature in MyoD-/- embryos underwent normal translocation but failed to undergo timely differentiation. In conclusion, these observations strongly support the hypothesis that Myf-5 plays a unique role in the development of muscles arising after translocation of epithelial dermamyotome cells along the medial edge of the somite to the subjacent myotome (e.g., back or epaxial muscle) and that MyoD plays a unique role in the development of muscles arising from migratory precursor cells (e.g., limb and branchial arch muscles, tongue, and diaphragm). In addition, the expression pattern of MyoD-lacZ transgenes in the intercostal and abdominal wall muscles of Myf-5-/- and MyoD-/- embryos suggests that appropriate development of these muscles is dependent on both genes and, therefore, these muscles have a dual embryonic origin (epaxial and hypaxial).     

Generation of a conditional null allele of Lbx1

The homeobox gene Lbx1 not only plays critical roles in myogenesis and neurogenesis during embryonic development but is also expressed in activated satellite cells of adult mice. To address the potential postnatal functions of Lbx1, we generated conditional Lbx1-null mice using the Cre-loxP system. We generated a mouse in which Exon 2 of Lbx1 was floxed (Lbx1flox/flox), followed by cross-breeding between the Lbx1flox/flox mouse and either a transgenic mouse where a tamoxifen-inducible Cre-recombinase (Cre) was ubiquitously expressed, or a Myf5Cre mouse where Cre was inserted into the Myf5 locus. In both Lbx1-null mouse lines generated, Pax3-expressing limb muscle precursor cells were seriously reduced during embryonic development and eventually the limb extensor muscles were lost after birth. Since the conditional Lbx1-null mice generated were viable for a prolonged time, they will be useful in the investigation of Lbx1 function throughout the lifespan of the mouse.     

Slow and Fast Muscle Fibers Are Preferentially Derived from Myoblasts Migrating into the Chick Limb Bud at Different Developmental Times

Avian limb myoblasts originate from somites and migrate into the periphery during limb bud formation. It is not known how these precursors become arranged into a stereotyped pattern of muscles and primary fiber types. We used in vivo surgical transplantation and anatomical analyses of thigh muscle patterns to ask whether myoblasts migrating into the limb bud at different developmental times adopt different fates. When myoblast migration was interrupted by transplanting limb bud tissue to the coelomic cavity of a host embryo early in the migratory period (stages 16-early 17), few thigh muscles were found at stages 30-33. Primordia that were present corresponded to muscles that normally contain a majority of slow myotubes. In limbs transplanted slightly later (stages late 17-18), the only missing muscles were those that normally contain the highest numbers of fast myotubes. Parallel results were obtained in chimeric limbs made by transplanting a quail limb bud to a chick host at different times during the migratory period, an experimental situation in which the limbs were not depleted of muscle precursors or nerves. These findings suggest that the earliest myoblast migrants give rise mainly to slow primary myotubes, the later migrants to fast myotubes. To determine whether the early limb bud environment defines the fate of migrating myoblasts, we assessed fiber type patterns in limbs that developed from young limb bud tissue (stages 15-early 16) transplanted to older hosts (stage 17). A significant depletion of slow myosin-positive profiles was found within slow muscles. Fast muscles were generally normal in size. These results provide in vivo evidence that limb myoblast diversity arises prior to the entry of myoblasts into the limb. We suggest that there is a gradual change in the proportions of myoblasts capable of forming slow and fast fiber types, a change which may begin in the somites or early in the migratory period.     

Altered myogenesis in Six1-deficient mice

Six homeoproteins are expressed in several tissues, including muscle, during vertebrate embryogenesis, suggesting that they may be involved in diverse differentiation processes. To determine the functions of the Six1 gene during myogenesis, we constructed Six1-deficient mice by replacing its first exon with the lacZ gene. Mice lacking Six1 die at birth because of severe rib malformations and show extensive muscle hypoplasia affecting most of the body muscles in particular certain hypaxial muscles. Six1(-/-) embryos have impaired primary myogenesis, characterized, at E13.5, by a severe reduction and disorganisation of primary myofibers in most body muscles. While Myf5, MyoD and myogenin are correctly expressed in the somitic compartment in early Six1(-/-) embryos, by E11.5 MyoD and myogenin gene activation is reduced and delayed in limb buds. However, this is not the consequence of a reduced ability of myogenic precursor cells to migrate into the limb buds or of an abnormal apoptosis of myoblasts lacking Six1. It appears therefore that Six1 plays a specific role in hypaxial muscle differentiation, distinct from those of other hypaxial determinants such as Pax3, cMet, Lbx1 or Mox2.     

Clonal separation and regionalisation during formation of the medial and lateral myotomes in the mouse embryo.

In vertebrates, muscles of the back (epaxial) and of the body wall and limbs (hypaxial) derive from precursor cells located in the dermomyotome of the somites. In this paper, we investigate the mediolateral regionalisation of epaxial and hypaxial muscle precursor cells during segmentation of the paraxial mesoderm and myotome formation, using mouse LaacZ/LacZ chimeras. We demonstrate that precursors of medial and lateral myotomes are clonally separated in the mouse somite, consistent with earlier studies in birds. This clonal separation occurs after segmentation of the paraxial mesoderm. We then show that myotome precursors are mediolaterally regionalised and that this regionalisation precedes clonal separation between medial and lateral precursors. Strikingly, the properties of myotome precursors are remarkably similar in the medial and lateral domains. Finally, detailed analysis of our clones demonstrates a direct spatial relationship between the myocytes in the myotome and their precursors in the dermomyotome, and earlier in the somite and presomitic mesoderm, refuting several models of myotome formation, based on permanent stem cell systems or extensive cell mingling. This progressive mediolateral regionalisation of the myotome at the cellular level correlates with progressive changes in gene expression in the dermomyotome and myotome.     

Distinct regulatory cascades for head and trunk myogenesis

Most head muscles arise from the pre-otic axial and paraxial head mesoderm. This tissue does not form somites, yet expresses the somitic markers Lbx1, Pax7 and Paraxis in a regionalised fashion. The domain set aside by these markers provides the lateral rectus muscle, the most caudal of the extrinsic eye muscles. In contrast to somitic cells that express Lbx1, lateral rectus precursors are non-migratory. Moreover, the set of markers characteristic for the lateral rectus precursors differs from the marker sets indicative of somitic muscle precursors. This suggests distinct roles for Lbx1/Pax7/Paraxis in the development of head and trunk muscles. When grafted to the trunk, the pre-otic head mesoderm fails to activate Lbx1, Pax7 or PARAXIS: Likewise, somites grafted into the region of the lateral rectus precursors fail to activate the lateral rectus marker set. This suggests that distinct regulatory cascades act in the development of trunk and head muscles, possibly reflecting their distinct function and evolution.