The weird and wonderful world of bacterial ribosome regulation

In every organism, translation of the genetic information into functional proteins is performed on the ribosome. In Escherichia coli up to 40% of the cell's total energy turnover is channelled toward the ribosome and protein synthesis. Thus, elaborate networks of translation regulation pathways have evolved to modulate gene expression in response to growth rate and external factors, ranging from nutrient deprivation, to chemical (pH, ionic strength) and physical (temperature) fluctuations. Since the fundamental players involved in regulation of the different phases of translation have already been extensively reviewed elsewhere, this review focuses on lesser known and characterized factors that regulate the ribosome, ranging from processing, modification and assembly factors, unusual initiation and elongation factors, to a variety of stress response proteins.     

Reconstitution of mammalian mitochondrial translation system capable of correct initiation and long polypeptide synthesis from leaderless mRNA

Mammalian mitochondria have their own dedicated protein synthesis system, which produces 13 essential subunits of the oxidative phosphorylation complexes. We have reconstituted an in vitro translation system from mammalian mitochondria, utilizing purified recombinant mitochondrial translation factors, 55S ribosomes from pig liver mitochondria, and a tRNA mixture from either Escherichia coli or yeast. The system is capable of translating leaderless mRNAs encoding model proteins (DHFR and nanoLuciferase) or some mtDNA-encoded proteins. We show that a leaderless mRNA, encoding nanoLuciferase, is faithfully initiated without the need for any auxiliary factors other than IF-2mt and IF-3mt. We found that the ribosome-dependent GTPase activities of both the translocase EF-G1mt and the recycling factor EF-G2mt are insensitive to fusidic acid (FA), the translation inhibitor that targets bacterial EF-G homologs, and consequently the system is resistant to FA. Moreover, we demonstrate that a polyproline sequence in the protein causes 55S mitochondrial ribosome stalling, yielding ribosome nascent chain complexes. Analyses of the effects of the Mg concentration on the polyproline-mediated ribosome stalling suggested the unique regulation of peptide elongation by the mitoribosome. This system will be useful for analyzing the mechanism of translation initiation, and the interactions between the nascent peptide chain and the mitochondrial ribosome.     

Structure of the chloroplast ribosome: novel domains for translation regulation

Gene expression in chloroplasts is controlled primarily through the regulation of translation. This regulation allows coordinate expression between the plastid and nuclear genomes, and is responsive to environmental conditions. Despite common ancestry with bacterial translation, chloroplast translation is more complex and involves positive regulatory mRNA elements and a host of requisite protein translation factors that do not have counterparts in bacteria. Previous proteomic analyses of the chloroplast ribosome identified a significant number of chloroplast-unique ribosomal proteins that expand upon a basic bacterial 70S-like composition. In this study, cryo-electron microscopy and single-particle reconstruction were used to calculate the structure of the chloroplast ribosome to a resolution of 15.5 Å. Chloroplast-unique proteins are visualized as novel structural additions to a basic bacterial ribosome core. These structures are located at optimal positions on the chloroplast ribosome for interaction with mRNAs during translation initiation. Visualization of these chloroplast-unique structures on the ribosome, combined with mRNA cross-linking, allows us to propose a model for translation initiation in chloroplasts in which chloroplast-unique ribosomal proteins interact with plastid-specific translation factors and RNA elements to facilitate regulated translation of chloroplast mRNAs.     

Translational Control of the Picornavirus Phenotype

Picornaviruses are small animal viruses with positive-strand genomic RNA, which is translated using cap-independent internal translation initiation. The key role in this is played by ciselements of the 5"-untranslated region (5"-UTR) and, in particular, by the internal ribosome entry site (IRES). The function of translational ciselements requires both canonical translation initiation factors (eIFs) and additional IRES trans-acting factors (ITAFs). All known ITAFs are cell RNA-binding proteins which play a variety of functions in noninfected cells. Specific features of translational ciselements substantially affect the phenotype and, in particular, tissue tropism and pathogenic properties of picornaviruses. It is clear that, in some cases, the molecular mechanism involved is a change in interactions between viral ciselements and ITAFs. The properties and tissue distribution of ITAFs may determine the biological properties of other viruses that also use the IRES-dependent translation initiation. Since this mechanism is also involved in translation of several cell mRNAs, ITAF may contribute to the regulation of the most important aspects of the living activity in noninfected cells.     

IRES‐mediated translation of cofilin regulates axonal growth cone extension and turning

In neuronal development, dynamic rearrangement of actin promotes axonal growth cone extension, and spatiotemporal translation of local mRNAs in response to guidance cues directs axonal growth cone steering, where cofilin plays a critical role. While regulation of cofilin activity is well studied, regulatory mechanism for cofilin mRNA translation in neurons is unknown. In eukaryotic cells, proteins can be synthesized by cap‐dependent or cap‐independent mechanism via internal ribosome entry site (IRES)‐mediated translation. IRES‐mediated translation has been reported in various pathophysiological conditions, but its role in normal physiological environment is poorly understood. Here, we report that 5′UTR of cofilin mRNA contains an IRES element, and cofilin is predominantly translated by IRES‐mediated mechanism in neurons. Furthermore, we show that IRES‐mediated translation of cofilin is required for both axon extension and axonal growth cone steering. Our results provide new insights into the function of IRES‐mediated translation in neuronal development.     

Switch from Cap- to Factorless IRES-Dependent 0 and +1 Frame Translation during Cellular Stress and Dicistrovirus Infection

Internal ribosome entry sites (IRES) are utilized by a subset of cellular and viral mRNAs to initiate translation during cellular stress and virus infection when canonical cap-dependent translation is compromised. The intergenic region (IGR) IRES of the Dicistroviridae uses a streamlined mechanism in which it can directly recruit the ribosome in the absence of initiation factors and initiates translation using a non-AUG codon. A subset of IGR IRESs including that from the honey bee viruses can also direct translation of an overlapping +1 frame gene. In this study, we systematically examined cellular conditions that lead to IGR IRES-mediated 0 and +1 frame translation in Drosophila S2 cells. Towards this, a novel bicistronic reporter that exploits the 2A “stop-go” peptide was developed to allow the detection of IRES-mediated translation in vivo. Both 0 and +1 frame translation by the IGR IRES are stimulated under a number of cellular stresses and in S2 cells infected by cricket paralysis virus, demonstrating a switch from cap-dependent to IRES-dependent translation. The regulation of the IGR IRES mechanism ensures that both 0 frame viral structural proteins and +1 frame ORFx protein are optimally expressed during virus infection.     

Stall no more at polyproline stretches with the translation elongation factors EF‐P and IF‐5A

Synthesis of polyproline proteins leads to translation arrest. To overcome this ribosome stalling effect, bacteria depend on a specialized translation elongation factor P (EF‐P), being orthologous and functionally identical to eukaryotic/archaeal elongation factor e/aIF‐5A (recently renamed ‘EF5’). EF‐P binds to the stalled ribosome between the peptidyl‐tRNA binding and tRNA‐exiting sites, and stimulates peptidyl‐transferase activity, thus allowing translation to resume. In their active form, both EF‐P and e/aIF‐5A are post‐translationally modified at a positively charged residue, which protrudes toward the peptidyl‐transferase center when bound to the ribosome. While archaeal and eukaryotic IF‐5A strictly depend on (deoxy‐) hypusination (hypusinylation) of a conserved lysine, bacteria have evolved diverse analogous modification strategies to activate EF‐P. In Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica a lysine is extended by β‐lysinylation and subsequently hydroxylated, whereas in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Shewanella oneidensis an arginine in the equivalent position is rhamnosylated. Inactivation of EF‐P, or the corresponding modification systems, reduces not only bacterial fitness, but also impairs virulence. Here, we review the function of EF‐P and IF‐5A and their unusual posttranslational protein modifications.     

Overexpression of Eukaryotic Translation Elongation Factor 3 Impairs Gcn2 Protein Activation

In eukaryotes, phosphorylation of translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) by the kinase Gcn2 (general control nonderepressible 2) is a key response to amino acid starvation. Sensing starvation requires that Gcn2 directly contacts its effector protein Gcn1, and both must contact the ribosome. We have proposed that Gcn2 is activated by uncharged tRNA bound to the ribosomal decoding (A) site, in a manner facilitated by ribosome-bound Gcn1. Protein synthesis requires cyclical association of eukaryotic elongation factors (eEFs) with the ribosome. Gcn1 and Gcn2 are large proteins, raising the question of whether translation and monitoring amino acid availability can occur on the same ribosome. Part of the ribosome-binding domain in Gcn1 has homology to one of the ribosome-binding domains in eEF3, suggesting that these proteins utilize overlapping binding sites on the ribosome and consequently cannot function simultaneously on the same ribosome. Supporting this idea, we found that eEF3 overexpression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae diminished growth on amino acid starvation medium (Gcn⁻ phenotype) and decreased eIF2α phosphorylation, and that the growth defect associated with constitutively active Gcn2 was diminished by eEF3 overexpression. Overexpression of the eEF3 HEAT domain, or C terminus, was sufficient to confer a Gcn⁻ phenotype, and both fragments have ribosome affinity. eEF3 overexpression did not significantly affect Gcn1-ribosome association, but it exacerbated the Gcn⁻ phenotype of Gcn1-M7A that has reduced ribosome affinity. Together, this suggests that eEF3 blocks Gcn1 regulatory function on the ribosome. We propose that the Gcn1-Gcn2 complex only functions on ribosomes with A-site-bound uncharged tRNA, because eEF3 does not occupy these stalled complexes.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">Trans</Emphasis>-translation: Findings and hypotheses

Trans-translation is a unique process that switches the synthesis of a polypeptide hain encoded by a nonstop mRNA to the mRNA-like domain of tmRNA. The process is used in bacterial cells for rescuing the ribosomes arrested during translation of nonstop mRNA and directing this mRNA and the polypeptide product for degradation. Activity of tmRNA is essential for bacterial survival under adverse conditions, the quality control of translation, and the regulation of certain physiological pathways. The review focuses on recent advances in trans-translation studies. Details of the tmRNA-SmpB interaction and the structures of early ribosomal complexes are characterized, the causes of the appearance of an empty A site in the translating ribosome and possible mechanisms of the stalled ribosome recognition and resume codon determination are discussed, and the proteins degrading nonstop mRNAs and tagged peptides are considered.