Up-regulation of GABAB Receptor Signaling by Constitutive Assembly with the K+ Channel Tetramerization Domain-containing Protein 12 (KCTD12)

GABA_B receptors are the G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) for GABA, the main inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system. Native GABA_B receptors comprise principle and auxiliary subunits that regulate receptor properties in distinct ways. The principle subunits GABA_B1a, GABA_B1b, and GABA_B2 form fully functional heteromeric GABA_B(1a,2) and GABA_B(1b,2) receptors. Principal subunits regulate forward trafficking of the receptors from the endoplasmic reticulum to the plasma membrane and control receptor distribution to axons and dendrites. The auxiliary subunits KCTD8, -12, -12b, and -16 are cytosolic proteins that influence agonist potency and G-protein signaling of GABA_B(1a,2) and GABA_B(1b,2) receptors. Here, we used transfected cells to study assembly, surface trafficking, and internalization of GABA_B receptors in the presence of the KCTD12 subunit. Using bimolecular fluorescence complementation and metabolic labeling, we show that GABA_B receptors associate with KCTD12 while they reside in the endoplasmic reticulum. Glycosylation experiments support that association with KCTD12 does not influence maturation of the receptor complex. Immunoprecipitation and bioluminescence resonance energy transfer experiments demonstrate that KCTD12 remains associated with the receptor during receptor activity and receptor internalization from the cell surface. We further show that KCTD12 reduces constitutive receptor internalization and thereby increases the magnitude of receptor signaling at the cell surface. Accordingly, knock-out or knockdown of KCTD12 in cultured hippocampal neurons reduces the magnitude of the GABA_B receptor-mediated K⁺ current response. In summary, our experiments support that the up-regulation of functional GABA_B receptors at the neuronal plasma membrane is an additional physiological role of the auxiliary subunit KCTD12.     

A biophysical characterization of the folded domains of KCTD12: insights into interaction with the GABAB2 receptor

Recent investigations have shown that members of the KCTD family play important roles in fundamental biological processes. Despite their roles, very limited information is available on their structures and molecular organization. By combining different experimental and theoretical techniques, we have here characterized the two folded domains of KCTD12, an integral component and modulator of the GABA_B2 receptor. Secondary prediction methods and CD spectroscopy have shown that the N‐terminal domain KCTD12_BTB assumes an α/β structure, whereas the C‐terminal domain KCTD12_H1 is predominantly characterized by a β‐structure. Binding assays indicate that the two domains independently expressed show a good affinity for each other. This suggests that the overall protein is likely endowed with a rather compact structure with two interacting structured domains joint by a long disordered region. Notably, both KCTD12_BTB and KCTD12_H1 are tetrameric when individually expressed. This finding could modify the traditional view that ascribes only to POZ/BTB domain a specific oligomerization role. The first quantification of the affinity of KCTD12_POZ/BTB for the C‐terminal region of GABA_B2 shows that it falls in the low micromolar range. Interestingly, we also demonstrate that a GABA_B2‐related peptide is able to bind KCTD12_BTB with a very high affinity. This peptide may represent a useful tool for modulating KCTD12/GABA_B2 interaction in vitro and may also constitute the starting point for the development of peptidomimetic compounds with a potential for therapeutic applications. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Single Expressed Glycine Receptor Domains Reconstitute Functional Ion Channels without Subunit-specific Desensitization Behavior

Cys loop receptors are pentameric arrangements of independent subunits that assemble into functional ion channels. Each subunit shows a domain architecture. Functional ion channels can be reconstituted even from independent, nonfunctional subunit domains, as shown previously for GlyRα1 receptors. Here, we demonstrate that this reconstitution is not restricted to α1 but can be transferred to other members of the Cys loop receptor family. A nonfunctional GlyR subunit, truncated at the intracellular TM3–4 loop by a premature stop codon, can be complemented by co-expression of the missing tail portion of the receptor. Compared with α1 subunits, rescue by domain complementation was less efficient when GlyRα3 or the GABA_A/C subunit ρ1 was used. If truncation disrupted an alternative splicing cassette within the intracellular TM3–4 loop of α3 subunits, which also regulates receptor desensitization, functional rescue was not possible. When α3 receptors were restored by complementation using domains with and without the spliced insert, no difference in desensitization was found. In contrast, desensitization properties could even be transferred between α1/α3 receptor chimeras harboring or lacking the α3 splice cassette proving that functional rescue depends on the integrity of the alternative splicing cassette in α3. Thus, an intact α3 splicing cassette in the TM3–4 loop environment is indispensable for functional rescue, and the quality of receptor restoration can be assessed from desensitization properties.     

Cullin 3 Recognition Is Not a Universal Property among KCTD Proteins

Cullin 3 (Cul3) recognition by BTB domains is a key process in protein ubiquitination. Among Cul3 binders, a great attention is currently devoted to KCTD proteins, which are implicated in fundamental biological processes. On the basis of the high similarity of BTB domains of these proteins, it has been suggested that the ability to bind Cul3 could be a general property among all KCTDs. In order to gain new insights into KCTD functionality, we here evaluated and/or quantified the binding of Cul3 to the BTB of KCTD proteins, which are known to be involved either in cullin-independent (KCTD12 and KCTD15) or in cullin-mediated (KCTD6 and KCTD11) activities. Our data indicate that KCTD6^BTB and KCTD11^BTB bind Cul3 with high affinity forming stable complexes with 4:4 stoichiometries. Conversely, KCTD12^BTB and KCTD15^BTB do not interact with Cul3, despite the high level of sequence identity with the BTB domains of cullin binding KCTDs. Intriguingly, comparative sequence analyses indicate that the capability of KCTD proteins to recognize Cul3 has been lost more than once in distinct events along the evolution. Present findings also provide interesting clues on the structural determinants of Cul3-KCTD recognition. Indeed, the characterization of a chimeric variant of KCTD11 demonstrates that the swapping of α2β3 loop between KCTD11^BTB and KCTD12^BTB is sufficient to abolish the ability of KCTD11^BTB to bind Cul3. Finally, present findings, along with previous literature data, provide a virtually complete coverage of Cul3 binding ability of the members of the entire KCTD family.     

Molecular recognition of Cullin3 by KCTDs: Insights from experimental and computational investigations

Recent investigations have highlighted a key role of the proteins of the KCTD (K-potassium channel tetramerization domain containing proteins) family in several fundamental biological processes. Despite the growing importance of KCTDs, our current understanding of their biophysical and structural properties is very limited. Biochemical characterizations of these proteins have shown that most of them act as substrate adaptor in E3 ligases during protein ubiquitination. Here we present a characterization of the KCTD5-Cullin3 interactions which are mediated by the KCTD5 BTB domain. Isothermal titration calorimetry experiments reveal that KCTD5 avidly binds the Cullin3 (Cul3). The complex presents a 5:5 stoichiometry and a dissociation constant of 59 nM. Molecular modeling and molecular dynamics simulations clearly indicate that the two proteins form a stable (KCTD5–Cul3)₅ pinwheel-shaped heterodecamer in which two distinct KCTD5 subunits cooperate in the binding of each cullin chain. Molecular dynamics simulations indicate that different types of interactions contribute to the stability of the assembly. Interestingly, residues involved in Cul3 recognitions are conserved in the KCTD5 orthologs and paralogs implicated in important biological processes. These residues are also rather well preserved in most of the other KCTD proteins. By using molecular modeling techniques, the entire ubiquitination system including the E3 ligase, the E2 conjugating enzyme and ubiquitin was generated. The analysis of the molecular architecture of this complex machinery provides insights into the ubiquitination processes which involve E3 ligases with a high structural complexity.     

The cell adhesion molecule neuroplastin-65 is a novel interaction partner of γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors

γ-Aminobutyric acid type A (GABA_A) receptors are pentameric ligand-gated ion channels that mediate fast inhibition in the central nervous system. Depending on their subunit composition, these receptors exhibit distinct pharmacological properties and differ in their ability to interact with proteins involved in receptor anchoring at synaptic or extra-synaptic sites. Whereas GABA_A receptors containing α1, α2, or α3 subunits are mainly located synaptically where they interact with the submembranous scaffolding protein gephyrin, receptors containing α5 subunits are predominantly found extra-synaptically and seem to interact with radixin for anchorage. Neuroplastin is a cell adhesion molecule of the immunoglobulin superfamily that is involved in hippocampal synaptic plasticity. Our results reveal that neuroplastin and GABA_A receptors can be co-purified from rat brain and exhibit a direct physical interaction as demonstrated by co-precipitation and Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis in a heterologous expression system. The brain-specific isoform neuroplastin-65 co-localizes with GABA_A receptors as shown in brain sections as well as in neuronal cultures, and such complexes can either contain gephyrin or be devoid of gephyrin. Neuroplastin-65 specifically co-localizes with α1 or α2 but not with α3 subunits at GABAergic synapses. In addition, neuroplastin-65 also co-localizes with GABA_A receptor α5 subunits at extra-synaptic sites. Down-regulation of neuroplastin-65 by shRNA causes a loss of GABA_A receptor α2 subunits at GABAergic synapses. These results suggest that neuroplastin-65 can co-localize with a subset of GABA_A receptor subtypes and might contribute to anchoring and/or confining GABA_A receptors to particular synaptic or extra-synaptic sites, thus affecting receptor mobility and synaptic strength.     

Glycosylation of β2 Subunits Regulates GABAA Receptor Biogenesis and Channel Gating

γ-Aminobutyric acid type A (GABA_A) receptors are heteropentameric glycoproteins. Based on consensus sequences, the GABA_A receptor β2 subunit contains three potential N-linked glycosylation sites, Asn-32, Asn-104, and Asn-173. Homology modeling indicates that Asn-32 and Asn-104 are located before the α1 helix and in loop L3, respectively, near the top of the subunit-subunit interface on the minus side, and that Asn-173 is located in the Cys-loop near the bottom of the subunit N-terminal domain. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we demonstrated that all predicted β2 subunit glycosylation sites were glycosylated in transfected HEK293T cells. Glycosylation of each site, however, produced specific changes in α1β2 receptor surface expression and function. Although glycosylation of Asn-173 in the Cys-loop was important for stability of β2 subunits when expressed alone, results obtained with flow cytometry, brefeldin A treatment, and endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase H digestion suggested that glycosylation of Asn-104 was required for efficient α1β2 receptor assembly and/or stability in the endoplasmic reticulum. Patch clamp recording revealed that mutation of each site to prevent glycosylation decreased peak α1β2 receptor current amplitudes and altered the gating properties of α1β2 receptor channels by reducing mean open time due to a reduction in the proportion of long open states. In addition to functional heterogeneity, endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase H digestion and glycomic profiling revealed that surface β2 subunit N-glycans at Asn-173 were high mannose forms that were different from those of Asn-32 and N104. Using a homology model of the pentameric extracellular domain of α1β2 channel, we propose mechanisms for regulation of GABA_A receptors by glycosylation.     

GABAB Receptor Constituents Revealed by Tandem Affinity Purification from Transgenic Mice

GABA_B receptors function as heterodimeric G-protein-coupled receptors for the neurotransmitter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Receptor subtypes, based on isoforms of the ligand-binding subunit GABA_B1, are thought to involve a differential set of associated proteins. Here, we describe two mouse lines that allow a straightforward biochemical isolation of GABA_B receptors. The transgenic mice express GABA_B1 isoforms that contain sequences for a two-step affinity purification, in addition to their endogenous subunit repertoire. Comparative analyses of purified samples from the transgenic mice and wild-type control animals revealed two novel components of the GABA_B1 complex. One of the identified proteins, potassium channel tetramerization domain-containing protein 12, associates with heterodimeric GABA_B receptors via the GABA_B2 subunit. In transfected hippocampal neurons, potassium channel tetramerization domain-containing protein 12 augmented axonal surface targeting of GABA_B2. The mice equipped with tags on GABA_B1 facilitate validation and identification of native binding partners of GABA_B receptors, providing insight into the molecular mechanisms of synaptic modulation.     

Barbiturates Require the N Terminus and First Transmembrane Domain of the δ Subunit for Enhancement of α1β3δ GABAA Receptor Currents

GABA_A receptors are composed predominantly of αβγ receptors, which mediate primarily synaptic inhibition, and αβδ receptors, which mediate primarily extrasynaptic inhibition. At saturating GABA concentrations, the barbiturate pentobarbital substantially increased the amplitude and desensitization of the α1β3δ receptor but not the α1β3γ2L receptor currents. To explore the structural domains of the δ subunit that are involved in pentobarbital potentiation and increased desensitization of α1β3δ currents, chimeric cDNAs were constructed by progressive replacement of γ2L subunit sequence with a δ subunit sequence or a δ subunit sequence with a γ2L subunit sequence, and HEK293T cells were co-transfected with α1 and β3 subunits or α1 and β3 subunits and a γ2L, δ, or chimeric subunit. Currents evoked by a saturating concentration of GABA or by co-application of GABA and pentobarbital were recorded using the patch clamp technique. By comparing the extent of enhancement and changes in kinetic properties produced by pentobarbital among chimeric and wild type receptors, we concluded that although potentiation of α1β3δ currents by pentobarbital required the δ subunit sequence from the N terminus to proline 241 in the first transmembrane domain (M1), increasing desensitization of α1β3δ currents required a δ subunit sequence from the N terminus to isoleucine 235 in M1. These findings suggest that the δ subunit N terminus and N-terminal portion of the M1 domain are, at least in part, involved in transduction of the allosteric effect of pentobarbital to enhance α1β3δ currents and that this effect involves a distinct but overlapping structural domain from that involved in altering desensitization.     

Up-regulation of Hyperpolarization-activated Cyclic Nucleotide-gated Channel 3 (HCN3) by Specific Interaction with K+ Channel Tetramerization Domain-containing Protein 3 (KCTD3)

Most ion channels consist of the principal ion-permeating core subunit(s) and accessory proteins that are assembled with the channel core. The biological functions of the latter proteins are diverse and include the regulation of the biophysical properties of the ion channel, its connection to signaling pathways and the control of its cell surface expression. There is recent evidence that native hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel complexes (HCN1–4) also contain accessory subunits, among which TRIP8b (tetratricopeptide repeat-containing Rab8b-interacting protein) has been most extensively studied. Here, we identify KCTD3, a so far uncharacterized member of the potassium channel tetramerization-domain containing (KCTD) protein family as an HCN3-interacting protein. KCTD3 is widely expressed in brain and some non-neuronal tissues and colocalizes with HCN3 in specific regions of the brain including hypothalamus. Within the HCN channel family, KCTD3 specifically binds to HCN3 and leads to a profound up-regulation of cell surface expression and current density of this channel. HCN3 can also functionally interact with TRIP8b; however, we found no evidence for channel complexes containing both TRIP8b and KCTD3. The C terminus of HCN3 is crucially required for functional interaction with KCTD3. Replacement of the cytosolic C terminus of HCN2 by the corresponding domain of HCN3 renders HCN2 sensitive to regulation by KCTD3. The C-terminal-half of KCTD3 is sufficient for binding to HCN3. However, the complete protein including the N-terminal tetramerization domain is needed for HCN3 current up-regulation. Together, our experiments indicate that KCTD3 is an accessory subunit of native HCN3 complexes.     

Homeostatic Competition between Phasic and Tonic Inhibition

The GABA_A receptors are the major inhibitory receptors in the brain and are localized at both synaptic and extrasynaptic membranes. Synaptic GABA_A receptors mediate phasic inhibition, whereas extrasynaptic GABA_A receptors mediate tonic inhibition. Both phasic and tonic inhibitions regulate neuronal activity, but whether they regulate each other is not very clear. Here, we investigated the functional interaction between synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA_A receptors through various molecular manipulations. Overexpression of extrasynaptic α6β3δ-GABA_A receptors in mouse hippocampal pyramidal neurons significantly increased tonic currents. Surprisingly, the increase of tonic inhibition was accompanied by a dramatic reduction of the phasic inhibition, suggesting a possible homeostatic regulation of the total inhibition. Overexpressing the α6 subunit alone induced an up-regulation of δ subunit expression and suppressed phasic inhibition similar to overexpressing the α6β3δ subunits. Interestingly, blocking all GABA_A receptors after overexpressing α6β3δ receptors could not restore the synaptic GABAergic transmission, suggesting that receptor activation is not required for the homeostatic interplay. Furthermore, insertion of a gephyrin-binding-site (GBS) into the α6 and δ subunits recruited α6_GBSβ3δ_GBS receptors to postsynaptic sites but failed to rescue synaptic GABAergic transmission. Thus, it is not the positional effect of extrasynaptic α6β3δ receptors that causes the down-regulation of phasic inhibition. Overexpressing α5β3γ2 subunits similarly reduced synaptic GABAergic transmission. We propose a working model that both synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA_A receptors may compete for limited receptor slots on the plasma membrane to maintain a homeostatic range of the total inhibition.     

Multiple Propofol-binding Sites in a γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor (GABAAR) Identified Using a Photoreactive Propofol Analog

Propofol acts as a positive allosteric modulator of γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA_ARs), an interaction necessary for its anesthetic potency in vivo as a general anesthetic. Identifying the location of propofol-binding sites is necessary to understand its mechanism of GABA_AR modulation. [³H]2-(3-Methyl-3H-diaziren-3-yl)ethyl 1-(phenylethyl)-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate (azietomidate) and R-[³H]5-allyl-1-methyl-5-(m-trifluoromethyl-diazirynylphenyl)barbituric acid (mTFD-MPAB), photoreactive analogs of 2-ethyl 1-(phenylethyl)-1H-imidazole-5-carboxylate (etomidate) and mephobarbital, respectively, have identified two homologous but pharmacologically distinct classes of intersubunit-binding sites for general anesthetics in the GABA_AR transmembrane domain. Here, we use a photoreactive analog of propofol (2-isopropyl-5-[3-(trifluoromethyl)-3H-diazirin-3-yl]phenol ([³H]AziPm)) to identify propofol-binding sites in heterologously expressed human α1β3 GABA_ARs. Propofol, AziPm, etomidate, and R-mTFD-MPAB each inhibited [³H]AziPm photoincorporation into GABA_AR subunits maximally by ∼50%. When the amino acids photolabeled by [³H]AziPm were identified by protein microsequencing, we found propofol-inhibitable photolabeling of amino acids in the β3-α1 subunit interface (β3Met-286 in β3M3 and α1Met-236 in α1M1), previously photolabeled by [³H]azietomidate, and α1Ile-239, located one helical turn below α1Met-236. There was also propofol-inhibitable [³H]AziPm photolabeling of β3Met-227 in βM1, the amino acid in the α1-β3 subunit interface photolabeled by R-[³H]mTFD-MPAB. The propofol-inhibitable [³H]AziPm photolabeling in the GABA_AR β3 subunit in conjunction with the concentration dependence of inhibition of that photolabeling by etomidate or R-mTFD-MPAB also establish that each anesthetic binds to the homologous site at the β3-β3 subunit interface. These results establish that AziPm as well as propofol bind to the homologous intersubunit sites in the GABA_AR transmembrane domain that binds etomidate or R-mTFD-MPAB with high affinity.     

Diversity of Structure and Function of α1α6β3δ GABAA Receptors: COMPARISON WITH α1β3δ AND α6β3δ RECEPTORS*

δ subunit-containing γ-aminobutyric acid, type A (GABA_A)receptors are expressed extrasynaptically and mediate tonic inhibition. In cerebellar granule cells, they often form receptors together with α₁ and/or α₆ subunits. We were interested in determining the architecture of receptors containing both subunits. We predefined the subunit arrangement of several different GABA_A receptor pentamers by concatenation. These receptors composed of α₁, α₆, β₃, and δ subunits were expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Currents elicited in response to GABA were determined in the presence and absence of 3α,21-dihydroxy-5α-pregnan-20-one (THDOC) or ethanol, or currents were elicited by 4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo[5,4-c]-pyridin-3-ol (THIP). Several subunit configurations formed active channels. We therefore conclude that δ can assume multiple positions in a receptor pentamer made up of α₁, α₆, β₃, and δ subunits. The different receptors differ in their functional properties. Functional expression of one receptor type was only evident in the combined presence of the neurosteroid THDOC with the channel agonist GABA. Most, but not all, receptors active with GABA/THDOC responded to THIP. None of the receptors was modulated by ethanol concentrations up to 30 mm. Several observations point to a preferred position of δ subunits between two α subunits in α₁α₆β₃δ receptors. This property is shared by α₁β₃δ and α₆β₃δ receptors, but there are differences in the additionally expressed isoforms.     

GABAA Receptor α and γ Subunits Shape Synaptic Currents via Different Mechanisms

Synaptic GABA_A receptors (GABA_ARs) mediate most of the inhibitory neurotransmission in the brain. The majority of these receptors are comprised of α1, β2, and γ2 subunits. The amygdala, a structure involved in processing emotional stimuli, expresses α2 and γ1 subunits at high levels. The effect of these subunits on GABA_AR-mediated synaptic transmission is not known. Understanding the influence of these subunits on GABA_AR-mediated synaptic currents may help in identifying the roles and locations of amygdala synapses that contain these subunits. Here, we describe the biophysical and synaptic properties of pure populations of α1β2γ2, α2β2γ2, α1β2γ1 and α2β2γ1 GABA_ARs. Their synaptic properties were examined in engineered synapses, whereas their kinetic properties were studied using rapid agonist application, and single channel recordings. All macropatch currents activated rapidly (<1 ms) and deactivated as a function of the α-subunit, with α2-containing GABA_ARs consistently deactivating ∼10-fold more slowly. Single channel analysis revealed that the slower current decay of α2-containing GABA_ARs was due to longer burst durations at low GABA concentrations, corresponding to a ∼4-fold higher affinity for GABA. Synaptic currents revealed a different pattern of activation and deactivation to that of macropatch data. The inclusion of α2 and γ1 subunits slowed both the activation and deactivation rates, suggesting that receptors containing these subunits cluster more diffusely at synapses. Switching the intracellular domains of the γ2 and γ1 subunits substantiated this inference. Because this region determines post-synaptic localization, we hypothesize that GABA_ARs containing γ1 and γ2 use different mechanisms for synaptic clustering.     

Molecular determinants of desensitization and assembly of the chimeric GABAA receptor subunits (α1/γ2) and (γ2/α1) in combinations with β2 and γ2

Two γ-aminobutyric acid_A (GABA_A) receptor chimeras were designed in order to elucidate the structural requirements for GABA_A receptor desensitization and assembly. The (α1/γ2) and (γ2/α1) chimeric subunits representing the extracellular N-terminal domain of α1 or γ2 and the remainder of the γ2 or α1 subunits, respectively, were expressed with β2 and β2γ2 in Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf-9) cells using the baculovirus expression system. The (α1/γ2)β2 and (α1/γ2)β2γ2 but not the (γ2/α1)β2 and (γ2/α1)β2γ2 subunit combinations formed functional receptor complexes as shown by whole-cell patch–clamp recordings and [³H]muscimol and [³H]flunitrazepam binding. Moreover, the surface immunofluorescence staining of Sf-9 cells expressing the (α1/γ2)-containing receptors was pronounced, as opposed to the staining of the (γ2/α1)-containing receptors, which was only slightly higher than background. To explain this, the (α1/γ2) and (γ2/α1) chimeras may act like α1 and γ2 subunits, respectively, indicating that the extracellular N-terminal segment is important for assembly. However, the (α1/γ2) chimeric subunit had characteristics different from the α1 subunit, since the (α1/γ2) chimera gave rise to no desensitization after GABA stimulation in whole-cell patch–clamp recordings, which was independent of whether the chimera was expressed in combination with β2 or β2γ2. Surprisingly, the (α1/γ2)(γ2/α1)β2 subunit combination did desensitize, indicating that the C-terminal segment of the α1 subunit may be important for desensitization. Moreover, desensitization was observed for the (α1/γ2)β2γ2 receptor with respect to the direct activation by pentobarbital. This suggests differences in the mechanism of channel activation for pentobarbital and GABA.     

Multiple potassium channel tetramerization domain (KCTD) family members interact with Gβγ, with effects on cAMP signaling

G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) initiate an array of intracellular signaling programs by activating heterotrimeric G proteins (Gα and Gβγ subunits). Therefore, G protein modifiers are well positioned to shape GPCR pharmacology. A few members of the potassium channel tetramerization domain (KCTD) protein family have been found to adjust G protein signaling through interaction with Gβγ. However, comprehensive details on the KCTD interaction with Gβγ remain unresolved. Here, we report that nearly all the 25 KCTD proteins interact with Gβγ. In this study, we screened Gβγ interaction capacity across the entire KCTD family using two parallel approaches. In a live cell bioluminescence resonance energy transfer–based assay, we find that roughly half of KCTD proteins interact with Gβγ in an agonist-induced fashion, whereas all KCTD proteins except two were found to interact through coimmunoprecipitation. We observed that the interaction was dependent on an amino acid hot spot in the C terminus of KCTD2, KCTD5, and KCTD17. While KCTD2 and KCTD5 require both the Bric-à-brac, Tramtrack, Broad complex domain and C-terminal regions for Gβγ interaction, we uncovered that the KCTD17 C terminus is sufficient for Gβγ interaction. Finally, we demonstrated the functional consequence of the KCTD–Gβγ interaction by examining sensitization of the adenylyl cyclase–cAMP pathway in live cells. We found that Gβγ-mediated sensitization of adenylyl cyclase 5 was blunted by KCTD. We conclude that the KCTD family broadly engages Gβγ to shape GPCR signal transmission.     

Specificity of Intersubunit General Anesthetic-binding Sites in the Transmembrane Domain of the Human α1β3γ2 γ-Aminobutyric Acid Type A (GABAA) Receptor

GABA type A receptors (GABA_AR), the brain''s major inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors, are the targets for many general anesthetics, including volatile anesthetics, etomidate, propofol, and barbiturates. How such structurally diverse agents can act similarly as positive allosteric modulators of GABA_ARs remains unclear. Previously, photoreactive etomidate analogs identified two equivalent anesthetic-binding sites in the transmembrane domain at the β⁺-α⁻ subunit interfaces, which also contain the GABA-binding sites in the extracellular domain. Here, we used R-[³H]5-allyl-1-methyl-5-(m-trifluoromethyl-diazirynylphenyl) barbituric acid (R-mTFD-MPAB), a potent stereospecific barbiturate anesthetic, to photolabel expressed human α1β3γ2 GABA_ARs. Protein microsequencing revealed that R-[³H]mTFD-MPAB did not photolabel the etomidate sites at the β⁺-α⁻ subunit interfaces. Instead, it photolabeled sites at the α⁺-β⁻ and γ⁺-β⁻ subunit interfaces in the transmembrane domain. On the (+)-side, α1M3 was labeled at Ala-291 and Tyr-294 and γ2M3 at Ser-301, and on the (−)-side, β3M1 was labeled at Met-227. These residues, like those in the etomidate site, are located at subunit interfaces near the synaptic side of the transmembrane domain. The selectivity of R-etomidate for the β⁺-α⁻ interface relative to the α⁺-β⁻/γ⁺-β⁻ interfaces was >100-fold, whereas that of R-mTFD-MPAB for its sites was >50-fold. Each ligand could enhance photoincorporation of the other, demonstrating allosteric interactions between the sites. The structural heterogeneity of barbiturate, etomidate, and propofol derivatives is accommodated by varying selectivities for these two classes of sites. We hypothesize that binding at any of these homologous intersubunit sites is sufficient for anesthetic action and that this explains to some degree the puzzling structural heterogeneity of anesthetics.     

Fragrant Dioxane Derivatives Identify β1-Subunit-containing GABAA Receptors

Nineteen GABA_A receptor (GABA_AR) subunits are known in mammals with only a restricted number of functionally identified native combinations. The physiological role of β1-subunit-containing GABA_ARs is unknown. Here we report the discovery of a new structural class of GABA_AR positive modulators with unique β1-subunit selectivity: fragrant dioxane derivatives (FDD). At heterologously expressed α1βxγ2L (x-for 1,2,3) GABA_AR FDD were 6 times more potent at β1- versus β2- and β3-containing receptors. Serine at position 265 was essential for the high sensitivity of the β1-subunit to FDD and the β1N286W mutation nearly abolished modulation; vice versa the mutation β3N265S shifted FDD sensitivity toward the β1-type. In posterior hypothalamic neurons controlling wakefulness GABA-mediated whole-cell responses and GABAergic synaptic currents were highly sensitive to FDD, in contrast to β1-negative cerebellar Purkinje neurons. Immunostaining for the β1-subunit and the potency of FDD to modulate GABA responses in cultured hypothalamic neurons was drastically diminished by β1-siRNA treatment. In conclusion, with the help of FDDs we reveal a functional expression of β1-containing GABA_ARs in the hypothalamus, offering a new tool for studies on the functional diversity of native GABA_ARs.