High-dose Insulin Therapy: is it Time for U-500 Insulin?

ObjectiveTo provide an overview of U-500 regular insulin action, review published clinical studies with U- 500 regular insulin, and offer guidance to practicing endocrinologists for identifying patients for whom U-500 regular insulin may be appropriate.MethodsThis review has been produced through a synthesis of relevant published literature compiled via a literature search (MEDLINE search of the English-language literature published between January 1969, and July 2008, related to U-500, insulin resistance, concentrated insulin, high-dose insulin, insulin pharmacokinetics, and diabetes management) and the authors’ collective clinical experience.ResultsThe obesity epidemic is contributing to an increase in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes, as well as to increasing insulin requirements in insulin-treated patients. Many of these patients exhibit severe insulin resistance, manifested by daily insulin requirements of 200 units or greater or more than 2 units/kg. Delivering an appropriate insulin volume to these patients can be difficult and inconvenient and may be best accomplished with U-500 regular insulin by multiple daily injections or with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, rather than with standard U-100 insulin. Implementation of U-500 regular insulin in patients previously on other insulin formulations is described with a treatment algorithm covering dosage requirements ranging from 150 to more than 600 units per day on the basis of the authors’ experience.ConclusionRegimen conversion of appropriately selected patients from high-dose, U-100 insulin to U-500 regular insulin therapy on the basis of the recommendations presented in this article may potentially result in improved glycemic control and lower cost. (Endocr Pract. 2009;15:71-79)     

Effect of Total Daily Dose on Efficacy,Dosing, and Safety of 2 Dose Titration Regimens of Human Regular U-500 Insulin in Severely Insulin-Resistant Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Objective: To examine the influence of baseline U-100 insulin total daily dose (TDD) on clinical outcomes in severely insulin-resistant patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes treated with human regular U-500 insulin (U-500R) from the perspective of current dosing recommendations.Methods: Data from a recent prospective, randomized trial comparing thrice-daily (TID) and twice-daily (BID) U-500R in 325 patients transitioned from highdose/high-volume U-100 insulin were analyzed across baseline U-100 TDD units and units/kg subgroups (≤300 units [n = 224, 68.9%] and >300 units [n = 101, 31.1%]; ≤2 units/kg [n = 96, 29.5%] and >2 units/kg [n = 229, 70.5%]). Subgroup effects on treatment differences were evaluated, and outcomes between treatment-pooled subgroups were compared.Results: At 24 weeks, significant reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were observed for all subgroups (range: -1.01% to -1.38%, P<.05). Within-subgroup treatment effects were similar with no treatment-by-subgroup interactions; however, a greater reduction was noted in the >300-units subgroup (P = .04). No TID/BID differences within subgroups or treatment-by-subgroup interactions were observed for TDD or weight increase from baseline. Overall hypoglycemia rates were similar between treatments (within subgroups) and showed no interactions. However, rates were higher in the >300-units subgroup for severe hypoglycemia (P = .04) and in both higher-dose subgroups for documented symptomatic hypoglycemia ≤70 mg/dL (P<.001, units; P = .001, units/kg).Conclusion: Both TID and BID U-500R were efficacious and safe across TDD subgroups, though higher hypoglycemia rates were observed in higher-dose, treatment-pooled subgroups. U-500R dosing recommendations have been updated accordingly.Abbreviations:AE = adverse eventBID = twice dailyHbA1c = glycated hemoglobinQID = 4 times dailyRCT = randomized clinical trialT2D = type 2 diabetesTDD = total daily doseTID = thrice dailyU-500R = human regular U-500 insulin     

Evaluation of Total Daily Dose and Glycemic Control for Patients Taking U-500 Regular Insulin Admitted to the Hospital

Objective: Patients using U-500 regular insulin are severely insulin resistant, requiring high doses of insulin. It has been observed that a patient's insulin requirements may dramatically decrease during hospitalization. This study sought to systematically investigate this phenomenon.Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with U-500 insulin outpatient regimens who were admitted to the San Antonio Military Medical Center over a 5-year period. Each patient's outpatient total daily dose (TDD) of insulin was compared to the average inpatient TDD. The outpatient estimated average glucose (eAG) was calculated from the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and compared to the average inpatient glucose.Results: There were 27 patients with a total of 62 separate admissions. The average age was 64.4 years, with a mean body mass index of 38.9 kg/m² and eAG of 203 mg/dL (HbA1c, 8.7%, 71.6 mmol/mol). All patients were converted from U-500 to U-100 upon admission. The average inpatient TDD of insulin was 91 units, versus 337 units as outpatients (P<.001). Overall, 89% of patients received ≤50% of their outpatient TDD. The average inpatient glucose was slightly higher than the outpatient eAG, 234 mg/dL versus 203 mg/dL (P = .003).Conclusion: U-500 insulin is prone to errors in the hospital setting, so conversion to U-100 insulin is a preferred option. Despite a significant reduction in insulin TDD, these patients had clinically similar glucose levels. Therefore, patients taking U-500 insulin as an outpatient can be converted to a U-100 basal-bolus regimen with at least a 50% reduction of their outpatient TDD.Abbreviations:BG = blood glucoseeAG = estimated average glucoseHbA1c = glycated hemoglobinNPO = nil per osSPSS = Statistical Package for the Social SciencesTDD = total daily dose     

Two Treatment Approaches for Human Regular U-500 Insulin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes not Achieving Adequate Glycemic Control on High-Dose U-100 Insulin Therapy With or Without Oral Agents: A Randomized,Titration-To-Target Clinical Trial

Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of 2 dosing regimens for human regular U-500 insulin (U-500R, 500 units/mL) replacing high-dose U-100 insulins with or without oral antihyperglycemic drugs in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D).Methods: We conducted a 24-week, open-label, parallel trial in 325 patients (demographics [means]: age, 55.4 years; diabetes duration, 15.2 years; body mass index, 41.9 kg/m²; glycated hemoglobin [HbA_1c], 8.7%; U-100 insulin dose, 287.5 units administered in 5 injections/day [median; range, 2 to 10]). Patients were randomized to thrice-daily (TID, n = 162) or twice-daily (BID, n = 163) U-500R after a 4-week lead-in period. The primary outcome was HbA_1c change from baseline.Results: After 24 weeks, both treatments demonstrated significant HbA_1c reductions (TID, -1.12%; BID, -1.22%; both, P<.001) and clinical equivalence (difference, -0.10%; 95% confidence interval, -0.33 to 0.12%; noninferiority margin, 0.4%). Comparable increases in total daily U-500R dose (TID, 242.7 to 343.1 units; BID, 249.0 to 335.0 units) were observed. Incidence and rate of documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (≤70 mg/dL) were lower for TID versus BID (P = .003 and P = .02, respectively); severe hypoglycemia was similar between treatments. Weight gain was similar in both groups (TID, 5.4 kg; BID, 4.9 kg).Conclusion: Initiation and titration of U-500R using either algorithm (TID or BID) improves glycemic control effectively and safely with fewer injections in patients with T2D treated with high-dose/high-volume U-100 insulin. These results provide clinicians with a practical framework for using U-500R in severely insulin-resistant patients with suboptimally controlled T2D.Abbreviations: BID = twice daily FAS = full analysis set HbA_1c = glycated hemoglobin PG = plasma glucose SMPG = self-monitored plasma glucose T2D = type 2 diabetes TDD = total daily dose TID = thrice daily U-500R = human regular U-500 insulin     

Clinical Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction with U-500 Insulin Pump Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectiveTo determine the safety and efficacy of U-500 regular insulin in pump therapy and to assess satisfaction with U-500 insulin pump therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe insulin resistance.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of medical records of 6 patients with type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance who had been using U-500 insulin pump therapy for at least 6 months. In addition, we conducted a telephone follow-up patient satisfaction survey.ResultsThe mean age of the patients was 57 ± 6 years. Of the 6 patients (3 men and 3 women), 4 were white, 1 was black, and 1 was Asian. The mean hemoglobin A1c value before continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy with U-500 regular insulin was 9.1% ± 1.8%, and the mean U-100 insulin dose required was 391 ± 91 U/day. In comparison, the mean U-500 insulin dose required at 6 months was 59.2 ± 13.6 U/day, which is equivalent to 296 ± 68 U/day of U-100 insulin (P = 0.04), and the mean hemoglobin A1c value at 6 months after treatment with the insulin pump using U-500 regular insulin was 6.9% ± 0.9% (P = 0.03). In addition, our study patients lost a mean of 6.1 lb during the 6-month period, and no patient had clinically significant episodes of hypoglycemia. The majority of the patients reported a higher satisfaction with the U-500 insulin pump therapy in comparison with conventional insulin treatment.ConclusionU-500 insulin pump therapy is a novel alternative for patients with type 2 diabetes and severe insulin resistance who have not met glycemic control goals with use of standard intensive insulin regimens. (Endocr Pract. 2007;13:721-725)     

A 24-Week,Prospective, Randomized,Open-Label,Treat-To-Target Pilot Study of Obese Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Severe Insulin Resistance to Assess the Addition of Exenatide on the Efficacy of U-500 Regular Insulin Plus Metformin

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of 500 U/mL (U-500) regular insulin + metformin with U-500 regular insulin + metformin + exenatide in improving glycemic control in patients with severely insulin-resistant type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsThirty patients with T2DM and severe insulin resistance were screened, and 28 were randomized to regular insulin U-500 + metformin or the GLP-1 analog exenatide, U-500, and metformin. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) levels, body weight, and insulin doses were documented at baseline and at 3 and 6 months. The number and severity hypoglycemic episodes were noted.ResultsThere were 7 males and 7 females in each group (U-500 + metformin and U-500 + metformin + exenatide). Overall, U-500 insulin + metformin, either alone or with the addition of exenatide, resulted in a significant improvement in HbA_1c in both groups, with no significant difference between the 2 groups. There was no meaningful weight change in those utilizing exenatide. Those on U-500 insulin and metformin alone had a tendency toward some weight gain. No severe hypoglycemia occurred during the study period. Symptomatic hypoglycemia was more common in the group on exenatide, but this occurred in only 5 patients, and the clinical significance of this is uncertain. Insulin dosage changes on U-500 regular insulin were variable but tended to be lower in those subjects on exenatide.ConclusionsU-500 regular insulin + metformin is effective for the treatment of T2DM patients with severe insulin resistance. The addition of exenatide may ameliorate potential weight gain but provides no additional improvement in glycemia. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:1143-1150)     

Glycemic Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients on Ambulatory Humulin-R U-500 Insulin

ObjectiveManaging hospitalized patients on ambulatory U-500 insulin is challenging because of limited guidance on how to safely adjust insulin doses during admission. We sought to evaluate glycemic outcomes in relation to inpatient insulin doses in patients receiving U-500 prior to hospitalization.MethodsRetrospective study of hospitalized patients on ambulatory U-500 seen consecutively from January 2015 to December 2019. Primary outcomes were inpatient hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and normoglycemia at different insulin dosages expressed as weight-based (unit/kg/d) inpatient total daily dose (TDD) and ratio of inpatient to outpatient TDD.ResultsWe identified 66 admissions of 46 unique patients. The median (interquartile range) body mass index was 41.0 kg/m² (35.1, 46.8), home TDD 212 units (120, 300), and home insulin dose 1.6 units/kg/d (1.1, 2.2). The median (interquartile range) inpatient insulin dose was 0.7 unit/kg/d (0.3, 1.0) and the ratio of inpatient to outpatient TDD was 0.4 (0.2, 0.8). Hyperglycemia persisted throughout the hospitalization. For the outcomes of hyperglycemia and normoglycemia, we found no association between increased levels of insulin dosages. For the outcome of hypoglycemia, significantly higher odds were observed when non-fasting patients received an inpatient TDD that was either > 40% of their home TDD or > 0.6 unit/kg/d of insulin.ConclusionPatients on ambulatory U-500 have significant hyperglycemia during admission. Inpatient insulin doses of 40% of home TDD or ≤ 0.6 unit/kg were not associated with increased hypoglycemia risk. Further prospective studies are needed to determine effective doses in these high-risk patients.     

Optimized Human Regular U-500 Insulin Treatment Improves β-Cell Function in Severely Insulin-Resistant Patients with Long-Standing Type 2 Diabetes and High Insulin Requirements

Objective: To assess β-cell function and insulin sensitivity following improvement in glycemic control in severely insulin-resistant patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D).Methods: A subset of patients in a 24-week, open-label, randomized trial comparing thrice-daily (n = 14/162) versus twice-daily (n = 11/163) human regular U-500 insulin (U-500R) underwent mixed meal tolerance testing at baseline and endpoint. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups (combined means: age, 54.0 years; diabetes duration, 13.6 years; body mass index, 38.8 kg/m²; glycated hemoglobin &lsqb;HbA_1c], 8.3%; U-100 insulin dose, 287.6 units/day, 2.6 units/kg/day). Primary outcome measure was ratio of area under the curve (AUC) for C-peptide to glucose (AUC_C-peptide/AUC_glucose) at 24-week endpoint.Results: Change from baseline HbA_1c, daily U-500R dose, and weight were -1.17% (P = .0002), +80.8 units (P = .0003), and +5.9 kg (P = .33), respectively. β-Cell function significantly improved after 24 weeks of U-500R therapy in combined treatment groups. The AUC_C-peptide/AUC_glucose increased 34.0% (ratio of least-squares geometric mean, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.18 to 1.52; P = .0001). Integral of total insulin secretion rate increased from 27.0 to 33.7 nmol/m², and glucose sensitivity improved from 18.3 to 24.0 pmol/min/m²/mM (both, P = .02). Matsuda index improved from 0.8 to 1.3 (P = .008).Conclusion: Despite long-standing diabetes and poor glycemic control at baseline, functional recovery of β-cells was observed with improved glycemic control in these severely insulin-resistant patients with T2D, possibly due to alleviation of glucotoxicity.Abbreviations:AUC = area under the curveBID = twice dailyHbA_1c = glycated hemoglobinISR = insulin secretion rateLSM = least-squares meanMMTT = mixed meal tolerance testPG = plasma glucoseT2D = type 2 diabetesTDD = total daily doseTID = thrice dailyU-500R = human regular U-500 insulin     

The Effect of Long-Term Use of U-500 Insulin Via Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion on Durability of Glycemic Control and Weight in Obese,Insulin-Resistant Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of U-500 insulin administered via continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in patients with insulin-resistant type 2 diabetes and high insulin requirements.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the effects of U-500 insulin administered via CSII on durability of gly-cemic control (HbAlc), body weight, total daily insulin dose, and incidence of hypoglycemia in 59 patients with insulin-resistant type 2 diabetes (duration of treatment 1 to 9.5 years; mean treatment duration 49 months). All variables were analyzed by 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) from pre-U-500 baseline to time points from 3 to 114 months.ResultsAfter 3 months of U-500 insulin use, hemoglobin A1c dropped significantly from a mean baseline of 8.3% to a mean value of 7.3% (P = .003), and this improvement was sustained for over 66 months of use. There was no significant overall change in body weight or total daily insulin dose over time with the use of U-500 insulin. For those subjects who did gain weight, there was a parallel increase in insulin dose that correlated with weight gain.The overall incidence of severe hypoglycemia was low over the study period, with a mean occurrence of 0.1 episodes per patient per year.ConclusionsU-500 insulin is safe and effective for extended use (up to 9.5 years) in patients with insulin-resistant type 2 diabetes who require high insulin doses, and provides sustained glycemic control without causing excessive weight gain. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:196-201)     

A Prospective Trial of U500 Insulin Delivered by Omnipod in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Severe Insulin Resistance

ObjectiveTo test the effectiveness and safety of U500 regular insulin delivered by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) via the Omnipod insulin delivery system in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus and severe insulin resistance.MethodsIn this prospective, 1-year, proof-of-concept trial, patients with insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes who had a hemoglobin A1c level of 7.0% or higher and severe insulin resistance (average insulin requirement, 1.74 units of insulin per kilogram each day; range, 1.4 to 2.64 units of insulin per kilogram [average insulin dose, 196.4 units daily]) were identified at routine office visits at Mountain Diabetes and Endocrine Center in Asheville, North Carolina, between December 2007 and August 2008. All patients had been on intensive insulin therapy with or without oral agents for more than 3 months. All patients were switched from baseline failed therapy to U500 regular insulin by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion via Omnipod. Effectiveness was assessed by hemoglobin A1c measurement and 72-hour continuous glucose monitoring at baseline and at weeks 13, 26, and, 52 and by treatment satisfaction assessed by the Insulin Delivery Rating System Questionnaire at baseline and at week 52 while on U500 via Omnipod.ResultsTwenty-one adults were enrolled (mean age, 54 years; mean duration of diabetes, 4 years; mean body mass index, 39.4 kg/m2; mean insulin requirement, 1.7 U/ kg per day; and mean hemoglobin A1c, 8.6%) whose previous treatment with U100 insulin regimens had failed. Twenty patients completed the study. Treatment with U500 insulin via Omnipod significantly reduced hemoglobin A1c by 1.23% (P < .001) and significantly increased the percentage of time spent in the blood glucose target range (70- 180 mg/dL) by 70.75% as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring (P < .001) without a significant increase in hypoglycemia. Patients were satisfied with treatment with U500 insulin via Omnipod, and 14 patients elected to remain on treatment at study completion.ConclusionsU500 insulin delivered subcutaneously continuously via Omnipod is a safe and effective method of insulin delivery in the very insulin-resistant type 2 diabetic population. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:778-784)     

When a unit of insulin is not a unit: Detemir dosing and insulin cost in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Background: Increasing acceptance of basal-bolus insulin therapy for the control of diabetes mellitus (DM) has led to newer formulations of basal insulin analogues. The newest one is detemir.Objectives: Clinical evidence suggests that patients with type 2 DM require higher doses of detemir than other basal insulins to achieve equivalent glycemic control. This study examines evidence for greater dosing requirements and the implications of higher doses on the cost of insulin treatment.Methods: We performed a MEDLINE search for randomized, prospective studies comparing detemir with other basal insulins in patients with type 2 DM that were published in English between January 2000 and November 2008. The mean daily doses of basal and bolus insulin and the mean total daily insulin doses were determined. Overall weighted mean doses of the insulins were used to estimate the mean total daily insulin doses required for a 100-kg patient, and published 2008 US retail prices were used to estimate the retail costs of basal-bolus and basal-only insulin regimens.Results: Seven trials involving 3311 patients were identified in the literature search. The mean total daily insulin dose was 0.80 unit/kg for detemir-based regimens and 0.58 unit/kg for comparison regimens. For basal-bolus regimens, the estimated retail cost of the mean total daily insulin dose was $11.24 for detemir-based regimens compared with $8.99 for glargine-based regimens and $6.41 for neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH)-based insulins. For basal-only regimens, the estimated retail cost of the mean total daily insulin dose was $8.23 for detemir compared with $5.19 for glargine and $2.35 for NPH.Conclusions: It is important for health care providers and patients to know that patients with type 2 DM may require substantially higher doses of detemir than other basal insulins. This should be considered when titrating the dose as well as in cost-benefit analyses of detemir versus other insulins.     

Analysis of Effectiveness of Human U-500 Insulin in Patients Unresponsive to Conventional Insulin Therapy

ObjectiveTo present a retrospective analysis of the effects of human U-500 insulin in 20 patients with type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance.MethodsMedical records of 20 patients with type 2 diabetes who had received U-500 insulin for at least 6 months were reviewed to determine glycemic control before and after this therapy. Human regular U-500 insulin therapy was initiated at a unit dosage equivalent to the previous standard insulin dosage. Comparisons of hemoglobin A1c levels, insulin doses, and body mass index at baseline and 6 months after changing to U-500 insulin therapy were analyzed.ResultsIn the 10 female and 10 male study subjects, the mean (± SD) hemoglobin A1c level was 9.59 ± 1.37% initially, and it decreased to 8.53 ± 1.11% at 3 months and to 7.83 ± 1.26% at 6 months after initiation of U-500 insulin therapy. In comparison with baseline, these decreases were statistically significant. The amount of insulin used and the body mass index did not change significantly from baseline to 6 months after initiation of U-500 insulin treatment.ConclusionAnalysis of data suggests that U-500 insulin therapy yields improved glycemic control in insulin-resistant patients who have poor control of blood glucose with use of standard insulin regimens. There is no proof, however, that improved glycemic control by this method decreases diabetes-related complications or improves survival. Further studies must be performed before U-500 insulin can be recommended as a standard therapy for patients with insulin resistance. (Endocr Pract. 2005;11:305-307)     

U500 Regular Insulin use in Insulin-Resistant type 2 Diabetic Veteran Patients

ObjectiveTo evaluate the use of U500 regular insulin therapy in insulin-resistant patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were previously treated with high-dosage U100 insulin regimens.Methods:At a large Veterans Affairs medical center, a retrospective chart review was performed of all patients whose U100 insulin regimens were converted to U500 regular insulin regimens using a protocol to ensure patient safety. Patients were followed up for longer than 6 months. Data reviewed included total daily dosage of insulin before and after regimen conversion and changes in hemoglobin A1c, body weight, lipids, and episodes of severe hypoglycemia.ResultsFifty-three patients met inclusion criteria. Average hemoglobin A1c level on U100 insulin regimens was 9.1 ± 1.7%, which decreased to 8.1 ± 1.3% (P < .001) after an average of 20 months (range, 6-52 months) on U500 insulin. The total daily insulin dosage at study end was not significantly greater on U500 (415 ± 166 units/day) than on U100 insulin (391 ± 120 units/day) (P = .34). Body weight did not change significantly (134 ± 29 kg vs 136 ± 30 kg, P = .18). There was a 20-mg/dL decrease in total cholesterol (P = .014). Triglyceride values decreased by 97 mg/dL (P = .005). Eight episodes of severe hypoglycemia were documented in patients treated with U500 insulin, but this was similar to the incidence in these same patients while treated with U100 insulin.ConclusionWe conclude that U500 insulin can be safely and effectively used in insulin-resistant patients with type 2 diabetes followed up at a large Veterans Affairs medical center using a protocol that ensures patients are thoroughly educated and carefully monitored. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:34-38)     

U-500 Regular Insulin Use in Hospitalized Patients

ObjectiveU-500 is a potent insulin used in patients with severe insulin resistance. This study aimed to describe the inpatient insulin requirements, insulin regimens, and glycemic control of hospitalized patients using U-500.MethodsA retrospective chart review of adult patients using U-500 insulin at home who were admitted to Cleveland Clinic hospitals between 2001 and 2011 was performed. Two groups were compared: those who were given U-500 while hospitalized (Group A) and those who were switched to a different insulin regimen (Group B). The percentages of hypoglycemia days and hyperglycemia days were calculated as the number of days with the respective event divided by the length of stay (LOS) in days for each patient.ResultsThere were 61 patients, 59% of which were male, with a median body mass index (BMI) 38.4, age 60.8 years, hemoglobin A1c 8.9% or 74 mmol/mol, and LOS 5.0 days. The majority (66%) remained on a U-500-based insulin regimen, while the rest were switched to a combination of long-, intermediate-, short- and/or fast-acting insulin. The endocrinology service was consulted for 61% of patients. Glucose levels were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Group B was given less insulin in the hospital compared to their home regimen. Group A had more frequent hypoglycemia days (mean ± SD: 15.3 ± 21.3 vs. 2.8 ± 6.4%) and more frequent severe hyperglycemia days (16.8 ± 21.8 % vs. 6.3 ± 9.8%) than Group B.ConclusionThis study suggests that there is a subset of patients on U-500 at home who might be managed on conventional insulin in the hospital. Patients who remain on U-500 in the hospital tend to continue with a high insulin dose requirement, which might predispose them to more frequent hypoglycemia. (Endocr Pract. 2015;21:54-58)     

Use of Insulin Pump Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes After Failure of Multiple Daily Injections

ObjectiveTo determine the effectiveness of insulin pump use (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion; CSII) in patients with type 2 diabetes (DM2) who have failed multiple daily injection (MDI) therapy.MethodsIn this retrospective study, charts of patients with DM2 who were started on CSII after failure of MDI were reviewed. Patients were categorized as primarily manual (fixed) bolus users or calculated (using pump software) bolus users. The change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), weight, and basal insulin dose from baseline to 6 months was determined.ResultsFifty-seven patients (20 men and 37 women) ranging in age from 13 to 71 were identified in the study. A significant reduction in HbA1c was observed from 8.75 to 7.69% (P<.001). There was an increase in body mass index (BMI) from a mean of 36.53 to a mean of 37.21. A decrease in basal insulin requirement per kilogram of weight (−0.10 U/kg) was noted (P = .03). Seven patients using U-500 insulin in the pump also had a significant decrease in HbA1C of 1.1 % (P<.001), along with a 0.071 U/kg drop in basal insulin requirements (P<.001). When comparing calculated bolus users to manual bolus users, there was no difference in HbA1C improvement (P = .58).ConclusionWe found that CSII improves glucose control in patients with DM2 who have failed MDI despite a decrease in overall insulin requirements. This includes patients with severe insulin resistance using U-500 insulin. Use of frequent bolus adjustment incorporating carbohydrate counting and current glucose level does not appear to be required for this benefit. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19: 9-13)     

Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Insulin Delivery with V-GO® Disposable Insulin Delivery Device Versus Multiple Daily Injections in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled on Basal Insulin

Objective: To compare two methods of delivering intensified insulin therapy (IIT) in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin ± concomitant antihyperglycemic agents in a real-world clinical setting.Methods: Data for this retrospective study were obtained using electronic medical records from a large multicenter diabetes system. Records were queried to identify patients transitioned to V-Go® disposable insulin delivery device (V-Go) or multiple daily injections (MDI) using an insulin pen to add prandial insulin when A1C was >7% on basal insulin therapy. The primary endpoint was the difference in A1C change using follow-up A1C results.Results: A total of 116 patients were evaluated (56 V-Go, 60 MDI). Both groups experienced significant glycemic improvement from similar mean baselines. By 27 weeks, A1C least squares mean change from baseline was -1.98% (-21.6 mmol/mol) with V-Go and -1.34% (-14.6 mmol/mol) with MDI, for a treatment difference of -0.64% (-7.0 mmol/mol; P = .020). Patients using V-Go administered less mean ± SD insulin compared to patients using MDI, 56 ± 17 units/day versus 78 ± 40 units/day (P<.001), respectively. Diabetes-related direct pharmacy costs were lower with V-Go, and the cost inferential from baseline per 1% reduction in A1C was significantly less with V-Go ($118.84 ± $158.55 per patient/month compared to $217.16 ± $251.66 per patient/month with MDI; P = .013).Conclusion: Progression to IIT resulted in significant glycemic improvement. Insulin delivery with V-Go was associated with a greater reduction in A1C, required less insulin, and proved more cost-effective than administering IIT with MDI.Abbreviations:A1C = glycated hemoglobinANCOVA = analysis of covarianceCI = confidence intervalCSII = continuous subcutaneous insulin infusionFPG = fasting plasma glucoseIIT = intensified insulin therapyLSM = least squares meanMDI = multiple daily injectionsT2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitusTDD = total daily dose     

Severe Insulin Resistance and Hypertriglyceridemia After Childhood Total Body Irradiation

ObjectiveTo characterize the metabolic phenotype of 2 cases of normal weight young women who developed type 2 diabetes (T2D), severe insulin resistance (insulin requirement >200 units/day), marked hypertriglyceridemia (>2000 mg/dL), and hepatic steatosis beginning 9 years after undergoing total body irradiation (TBI) and bone marrow transplantation for childhood cancer.MethodsFasting plasma glucose, insulin, free fatty acids (FFAs), leptin, adiponectin, resistin, TNFα, and IL-6 were measured in each case and in 8 healthy women; Case 1 was also assessed after initiating pioglitazone. Coding regions and splice junctions of PPARG, LMNA, and AKT2 were sequenced in Case 1 and of PPARG in Case 2 to evaluate for familial partial lipodystrophies. Genotyping of APOE was performed in Case 1 to rule out type III hyperlipoproteinemia.ResultsBoth cases had elevated plasma levels of insulin, leptin, resistin, and IL-6, high-normal to elevated TNFα, and low to low-normal adiponectin in keeping with post-receptor insulin resistance and adipose tissue inflammation. Case 1 experienced a biochemical response to pioglitazone. No causative mutations for partial lipodystrophies or type III hyperlipoproteinemia were identified.ConclusionThough metabolic derangements have previously been reported in association with TBI, few cases have described insulin resistance and hypertriglyceridemia as severe as that seen in our patients. We speculate that early childhood TBI may impede adipose tissue development leading to metabolic complications from an attenuated ability of adipose tissue to accommodate caloric excess, and propose that this extreme metabolic syndrome be evaluated for as a late complication of TBI. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:51-58)     

Basal-Bolus Regimen With Insulin Analogues Versus Human Insulin in Medical Patients with type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Latin America

Objective: Few randomized studies have focused on the optimal management of non–intensive care unit patients with type 2 diabetes in Latin America. We compared the safety and efficacy of a basal-bolus regimen with analogues and human insulins in general medicine patients admitted to a University Hospital in Asunción, Paraguay.Methods: In a prospective, open-label trial, we randomized 134 nonsurgical patients with blood glucose (BG) between 140 and 400 mg/dL to a basal-bolus regimen with glargine once daily and glulisine before meals (n = 66) or Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) twice daily and regular insulin before meals (n = 68). Major outcomes included differences in daily BG levels and frequency of hypoglycemic events between treatment groups.Results: There were no differences in the mean daily BG (157 ± 37 mg/dL versus 158 ± 44 mg/dL; P = .90) or in the number of BG readings within target <140 mg/dL before meals (76% versus 74%) between the glargine/glulisine and NPH/regular regimens. The mean insulin dose in the glargine/glulisine group was 0.76 ± 0.3 units/kg/day (glargine, 22 ± 9 units/day; glulisine, 31 ± 12 units/day) and was not different compared with NPH/regular group (0.75 ± 0.3 units/kg/day [NPH, 28 ± 12 units/day; regular, 23 ± 9 units/day]). The overall prevalence of hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) was similar between patients treated with NPH/regular and glargine/glulisine (38% versus 35%; P = .68), but more patients treated with human insulin had severe (<40 mg/dL) hypoglycemia (7.6% versus 25%; P = .08). There were no differences in length of hospital stay or mortality between groups.Conclusion: The basal-bolus regimen with insulin analogues resulted in equivalent glycemic control and frequency of hypoglycemia compared to treatment with human insulin in hospitalized patients with diabetes.Abbreviations: BG = blood glucose BMI = body mass index HbA_1c = glycated hemoglobin NPH = Neutral Protamine Hagedorn T2D = type 2 diabetes