A highly sensitive fluorescence sensor based on lucigenin/chitosan/SiO2 composite nanoparticles for microRNA detection using magnetic separation

In this paper, a convenient reverse‐phase microemulsion method for the synthesis of SiO₂ nanoparticles (NPs) by simply introducing the chitosan and fluorescent dye of lucigenin during the formation reaction of SiO₂ NPs was proposed. Addition of chitosan can make the SiO₂ NPs porous, and increases lucigenin molecule incorporation into chitosan/SiO₂ NPs nanopores based on electrostatic interaction and supermolecular forces. Therefore, fluorescence quantum yield of the lucigenin/chitosan/SiO₂ composite nanoparticles was increased by introduction of chitosan and compared with lucigenin/SiO₂ NPs without chitosan. Because the number of negative charges carried when using single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) was different from that of double‐stranded DNA (dsDNA), the numbers of lucigenin/chitosan/SiO₂ composite nanoparticles with positive charge adsorbed using ssDNA or dsDNA were different. Consequently, fluorescence intensity caused using ssDNA or dsDNA/miRNA was clearly discriminative. With increase in target DNA/miRNA concentration, the difference in fluorescence intensity also increased, resulting in a good linear relationship between fluorescence intensity sensitizing value and target miRNA concentrations. Therefore, a new fluorescence analysis method for direct detection of let‐7a in human gastric cancer cell samples without enzyme, label free and no immobilization was established using lucigenin/chitosan/SiO₂ composite nanoparticles as a DNA hybrid indicator. The proposed method had high sensitivity and selectivity, low cost and the detection limit was 10 fM (S/N = 3).     

Cyanine dyes for the detection of double stranded DNA

Twenty three novel cyanine dyes have been applied as fluorescent stains for the detection of nucleic acids in agarose gel electrophoresis. Significant fluorescence enhancement of these dyes in the presence of double stranded DNA was observed. Five dyes offered superior sensitivity in the detection and quantification of DNA, over Ethidium Bromide, the most commonly used nucleic acid stain.     

Steady‐state and time‐resolved fluorescence of tetramethylrhodamine attached to DNA: correlation with DNA sequences

Time‐resolved fluorescence as well as steady‐state absorption and fluorescence were detected in order to study the interactions between tetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA) and DNA when TAMRA was covalently labeled on single‐ and double‐stranded oligonucleotides. Fluorescence intensity quenching and lifetime changes were characterized and correlated with different DNA sequences. The results demonstrated that the photoinduced electron transfer interaction between guanosine residues and TAMRA introduced a short lifetime fluorescence component when guanosine residues were at the TAMRA‐attached terminal of the DNA sequences. The discrepancy of two‐state and three‐state models in previous studies was due to the DNA sequence selection and sensitivity of techniques used to detect the short lifetime component. The results will help the design of fluorescence‐based experiments related to a dye labeled probe. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Nanostructured luminescently labeled nucleic acids

Important and emerging trends at the interface of luminescence, nucleic acids and nanotechnology are: (i) the conventional luminescence labeling of nucleic acid nanostructures (e.g. DNA tetrahedron); (ii) the labeling of bulk nucleic acids (e.g. single‐stranded DNA, double‐stranded DNA) with nanostructured luminescent labels (e.g. copper nanoclusters); and (iii) the labeling of nucleic acid nanostructures (e.g. origami DNA) with nanostructured luminescent labels (e.g. silver nanoclusters). This review surveys recent advances in these three different approaches to the generation of nanostructured luminescently labeled nucleic acids, and includes both direct and indirect labeling methods.     

Homogeneous real-time detection and quantification of nucleic acid amplification using restriction enzyme digestion

A method for real-time fluorescent detection and quantification of nucleic acid amplification using a restriction endonuclease was developed. In this homogeneous system detection is mediated by a primer containing a reporter and quencher moiety at its 5' terminus separated by a short section of DNA encoding a restriction enzyme recognition sequence. In the single stranded form, the signal from the fluorescent reporter is quenched due to fluorescence resonance energy transfer. However, as the primer becomes incorporated into a double stranded amplicon, a restriction enzyme present in the reaction cleaves the DNA linking the reporter and quencher, allowing unrestricted fluorescence of the reporter. To test this system, a primer specific for the E6 gene of human papilloma virus (HPV) 16 was combined with the cleavable energy transfer label and used to amplify HPV16 positive DNA. In the presence of the thermally stable restriction enzyme BstNI, the reporter system was found to generate a fluorescent signal in proportion to the amount of template DNA. In addition to this direct format, the reporter primer was also used to monitor and quantify the amplification of other sequences. This was accomplished by using primers that contain a tag sequence complementary to the reporter oligonucleotide.     

A toolbox for generating single‐stranded DNA in optical tweezers experiments

Essential genomic transactions such as DNA‐damage repair and DNA replication take place on single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) or require specific single‐stranded/double‐stranded DNA (ssDNA/dsDNA) junctions (SDSJ). A significant challenge in single‐molecule studies of DNA–protein interactions using optical trapping is the design and generation of appropriate DNA templates. In contrast to dsDNA, only a limited toolbox is available for the generation of ssDNA constructs for optical tweezers experiments. Here, we present several kinds of DNA templates suitable for single‐molecule experiments requiring segments of ssDNA of several kilobases in length. These different biotinylated dsDNA templates can be tethered between optically trapped microspheres and can, by the subsequent use of force‐induced DNA melting, be converted into partial or complete ssDNA molecules. We systematically investigated the time scale and efficiency of force‐induced melting at different ionic strengths for DNA molecules of different sequences and lengths. Furthermore, we quantified the impact of microspheres of different sizes on the lifetime of ssDNA tethers in optical tweezers experiments. Together, these experiments provide deeper insights into the variables that impact the production of ssDNA for single molecules studies and represent a starting point for further optimization of DNA templates that permit the investigation of protein binding and kinetics on ssDNA. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 99:611–620, 2013.     

A label‐free DNAzyme‐cleaving fluorescence method for the determination of trace Pb2+ based on catalysis of AuPd nanoalloy on the reduction of rhodamine 6G

The substrate chain of double‐stranded DNA (dsDNA) could be specifically cleaved by Pb²⁺ to release single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) that adsorbs onto the AuPd nanoalloy (AuPdNP) to form a stable AuPdNP–ssDNA complex, but the dsDNA can not protect AuPdNPs in large AuPdNP aggregates (AuPdNPA) under the action of NaCl. AuPdNP–ssDNA and large AuPdNPA could be separated by centrifugation. On increasing the concentration of Pb²⁺, the amount of released ssDNA increased; AuPdNP–ssDNA increased in the centrifugation solution exhibiting a catalytic effect on the slow reaction of rhodamine 6G (Rh6G) and NaH₂PO₂, which led to fluorescence quenching at 552 nm. The decrease in fluorescence intensity (ΔF) was linear to the concentration of Pb²⁺ within the range 0.33–8.00 nmol/L, with a detection limit of 0.21 nmol/L. The proposed method was applied to detect Pb²⁺ in water samples, with satisfactory results. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Study on the interaction between ginsenoside Rh2 and calf thymus DNA by spectroscopic techniques

The interaction between ginsenoside Rh2 (G‐Rh2) and calf thymus DNA (ctDNA) was investigated by spectroscopic methods including UV–vis absorption, fluorescence and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, coupled with DNA melting techniques and viscosity measurements. Stern–Volmer plots at different temperatures proved that the quenching mechanism was a static quenching procedure. The thermodynamic parameters, enthalpy change (ΔH) and entropy change (ΔS) were calculated to be –22.83 KJ · mol^–1and 15.11 J · mol^–1 · K^–1by van ’t Hoff equation, suggesting that hydrophobic force might play a major role in the binding of G‐Rh2 to ctDNA. Moreover, the fluorescence quenching study with potassium iodide as quencher indicated that the K_SV (Stern–Volmer quenching constant) value for the bound G‐Rh2 with ctDNA was lower than the free G‐Rh2. The relative viscosity of ctDNA increased with the addition of G‐Rh2 and also the ctDNA melting temperature increased in the presence of G‐Rh2. Denatured DNA studies showed that quenching by single‐stranded DNA was less than that by double‐stranded DNA. The observed changes in CD spectra also demonstrated that the intensities of the positive and negative bands decreased with the addition of G‐Rh2. The experimental results suggest that G‐Rh2 molecules bind to ctDNA via an intercalative binding mode. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Label-less fluorescence-based method to detect hybridization with applications to DNA micro-array

By coupling scattered light from DNA to excite fluorescence in a polymer, we describe a quantitative, label-free assay for DNA hybridization detection. Since light scattering is intrinsically proportional to number of molecules, the change in (scattering coupled) fluorescence is highly linear with respect to percent binding of single stranded DNA (ssDNA) target with the immobilized ssDNA probes. The coupling is achieved by immobilizing ssDNA on a fluorescent polymer film at optimum thickness in nanoscale. The fluorescence from the underlining polymer increases due to proportionate increase in scattering from double stranded DNA (dsDNA) (i.e., probe-target binding) compared to ssDNA (i.e., probe). Because the scattering is proportional to fourth power of refractive index, the detection of binding is an order of magnitude more sensitive compared to other label-free optical methods, such as, reflectivity, interference, ellipsometry and surface-plasmon resonance. Remarkably, polystyrene film of optimum thickness 30 nm is the best fluorescent agent since its excitation wavelength matches (within 5 nm) with wavelength for the maximum refractive index difference between ssDNA and dsDNA. A quantitative model (with no fitting parameters) explains the observations. Potential dynamic range is 1 in 10(4) at signal-to-noise ratio of 3:1.     

Nanographite‐based fluorescent biosensor for detecting microRNA using duplex‐specific nuclease‐assisted recycling

The development of a nanographite (NG)‐based fluorescent biosensor for detecting microRNA (miRNA) is reported. Duplex‐specific nuclease (DSN)‐assisted signal amplification was key to its function. In the absence of a target, with the assistance of p‐stacking interactions, the NG adsorbed the double carboxyfluorescein (FAM)‐labelled probe (DFP) whose surface was perfectly complementary to miRNA, leading to quenching of FAM fluorescence. In the presence of a target, double‐stranded DNA/RNA hybrids were repelled by the NG and fluorescence was restored. Meanwhile, the considerable increase in signal strength and sensitivity suggests DSN‐mediated target recycling as an application. The detection limit of the proposed biosensor for miRNA was 10 pmol/L; there was a linear correlation when the miRNA concentration ranged from 50 pmol/L to 5 nmol/L. Additionally, the method could distinguish let‐7b from most let‐7 miRNA family members and was successfully used in a sample assay. This biosensor is a novel and highly sensitive tool for miRNA detection and has great potential for biochemical research, disease diagnosis, and therapy.     

High‐resolution melt analysis without DNA extraction affords rapid genotype resolution and species identification

Extracting and sequencing DNA from specimens can impose major time and monetary costs to studies requiring genotyping, or identification to species, of large numbers of individuals. As such, so‐called direct PCR methods have been developed enabling significant savings at the DNA extraction step. Similarly, real‐time quantitative PCR techniques (qPCR) offer very cost‐effective alternatives to sequencing. High‐resolution melt analysis (HRM) is a qPCR method that incorporates an intercalating dye into a double‐stranded PCR amplicon. The dye fluoresces brightly, but only when it is bound. Thus, after PCR, raising the temperature of the amplicon while measuring the fluorescence of the reaction results in the generation of a sequence‐specific melt curve, allowing discrimination of genotypes. Methods combining HRM (or other qPCR methods) and direct PCR have not previously been reported, most likely due to concerns that any tissue in the reaction tube would interfere with detection of the fluorescent signal. Here, we couple direct PCR with HRM and, by way of three examples, demonstrate a very quick and cost‐effective method for genotyping large numbers of specimens, using Rotor‐Gene HRM instruments (QIAGEN). In contrast to the heated‐block design of most qPCR/HRM instruments, the Rotor‐Gene's centrifugal rotor and air‐based temperature‐regulation system facilitate our method by depositing tissues away from the pathway of the machine's fluorescence detection optics.     

AtTRB1, a telomeric DNA‐binding protein from Arabidopsis,is concentrated in the nucleolus and shows highly dynamic association with chromatin

AtTRB1, 2 and 3 are members of the SMH (single Myb histone) protein family, which comprises double‐stranded DNA‐binding proteins that are specific to higher plants. They are structurally conserved, containing a Myb domain at the N‐terminus, a central H1/H5‐like domain and a C‐terminally located coiled‐coil domain. AtTRB1, 2 and 3 interact through their Myb domain specifically with telomeric double‐stranded DNA in vitro, while the central H1/H5‐like domain interacts non‐specifically with DNA sequences and mediates protein–protein interactions. Here we show that AtTRB1, 2 and 3 preferentially localize to the nucleus and nucleolus during interphase. Both the central H1/H5‐like domain and the Myb domain from AtTRB1 can direct a GFP fusion protein to the nucleus and nucleolus. AtTRB1–GFP localization is cell cycle‐regulated, as the level of nuclear‐associated GFP diminishes during mitotic entry and GFP progressively re‐associates with chromatin during anaphase/telophase. Using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching and fluorescence loss in photobleaching, we determined the dynamics of AtTRB1 interactions in vivo. The results reveal that AtTRB1 interaction with chromatin is regulated at two levels at least, one of which is coupled with cell‐cycle progression, with the other involving rapid exchange.     

Surface shapes and surrounding environment analysis of single‐ and double‐stranded DNA‐binding proteins in protein‐DNA interface

Protein‐DNA bindings are critical to many biological processes. However, the structural mechanisms underlying these interactions are not fully understood. Here, we analyzed the residues shape (peak, flat, or valley) and the surrounding environment of double‐stranded DNA‐binding proteins (DSBs) and single‐stranded DNA‐binding proteins (SSBs) in protein‐DNA interfaces. In the results, we found that the interface shapes, hydrogen bonds, and the surrounding environment present significant differences between the two kinds of proteins. Built on the investigation results, we constructed a random forest (RF) classifier to distinguish DSBs and SSBs with satisfying performance. In conclusion, we present a novel methodology to characterize protein interfaces, which will deepen our understanding of the specificity of proteins binding to ssDNA (single‐stranded DNA) or dsDNA (double‐stranded DNA). Proteins 2016; 84:979–989. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Comparison of DNA and RNA quantification methods suitable for parameter estimation in metabolic modeling of microorganisms

Recent developments in cellular and molecular biology require the accurate quantification of DNA and RNA in large numbers of samples at a sensitivity that enables determination on small quantities. In this study, five current methods for nucleic acid quantification were compared: (i) UV absorbance spectroscopy at 260 nm, (ii) colorimetric reaction with orcinol reagent, (iii) colorimetric reaction based on diphenylamine, (iv) fluorescence detection with Hoechst 33258 reagent, and (v) fluorescence detection with thiazole orange reagent. Genomic DNA of three different microbial species (with widely different G+C content) was used, as were two different types of yeast RNA and a mixture of equal quantities of DNA and RNA. We can conclude that for nucleic acid quantification, a standard curve with DNA of the microbial strain under study is the best reference. Fluorescence detection with Hoechst 33258 reagent is a sensitive and precise method for DNA quantification if the G+C content is less than 50%. In addition, this method allows quantification of very low levels of DNA (nanogram scale). Moreover, the samples can be crude cell extracts. Also, UV absorbance at 260 nm and fluorescence detection with thiazole orange reagent are sensitive methods for nucleic acid detection, but only if purified nucleic acids need to be measured.     

Nucleotides sequestered at different subsite loci within DNA‐binding pockets of two OB‐fold single‐stranded DNA‐binding proteins are unstacked to different extents

The gene 5 protein (g5p) encoded by the Ff strains of Escherichia coli bacteriophages is a dimeric single‐stranded DNA‐binding protein (SSB) that consists of two identical OB‐fold (oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide‐binding) motifs. Ultrafast time‐resolved fluorescence measurements were carried out to investigate the effect of g5p binding on the conformation of 2‐aminopurine (2AP) labels positioned between adenines or cytosines in the 16‐nucleotide antiparallel tails of DNA hairpins. The measurements revealed significant changes in the conformational heterogeneity of the 2AP labels caused by g5p binding. The extent of the changes was dependent on sub‐binding‐site location, but generally resulted in base unstacking. When bound by g5p, the unstacked 2AP population increased from ～22% to 59–67% in C‐2AP‐C segments and from 39% to 77% in an A‐2AP‐A segment. The OB‐fold RPA70A domain of the human replication protein A also caused a significant amount of base unstacking at various locations within the DNA binding site as evidenced by steady‐state fluorescence titration measurements using 2AP‐labeled 5‐mer DNAs. These solution studies support the concept that base unstacking at most of a protein's multiple sub‐binding‐site loci may be a feature that allows non‐sequence specific OB‐fold proteins to bind to single‐stranded DNAs (ssDNAs) with minimal preference for particular sequences. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Biopolymers 99: 484–496, 2013.     

Electrochemical detection of DNA hybridization using a change in flexibility

A novel electrochemical method of detecting DNA hybridization is presented based on the change in flexibility between the single and double stranded DNA. A recognition surface based on gold nanoparticles (GNPs) is firstly modified via mixing self-assembled monolayer of thiolated probe DNA and 1,6-hexanedithiol. The hybridization and electrochemical detection are performed on the surface of probe-modified GNPs and electrode, respectively. Here in our method the charge transfer resistance (R(ct)) signal is enhanced by blocking the surface of electrode with DNA covered GNPs. The GNPs will be able to adsorb on the gold electrode when covered with flexible single stranded DNA (ssDNA). On the contrary, it will be repelled from the electrode, when covered with stiff double stranded DNA (dsDNA). Therefore, different R(ct) signals are observed before and after hybridization. The hybridization events are monitored by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurement based on the R(ct) signals without any external labels. This method provides an alternative route for expanding the range of detection methods available for DNA hybridization.     

Characterization of the binding of paylean and DNA by fluorescence,UV spectroscopy and molecular docking techniques

The interaction of paylean (PL) with calf thymus DNA (ctDNA) was investigated using fluorescence spectroscopy, UV absorption, melting studies, ionic strength, viscosity experiments and molecular docking under simulated physiological conditions. Values for the binding constant K_a between PL and DNA were 5.11 × 10³, 2.74 × 10³ and 1.74 × 10³ L mol^–1 at 19, 29 and 39°C respectively. DNA quenched the intrinsic fluorescence of PL via a static quenching procedure as shown from Stern–Volmer plots. The relative viscosity and the melting temperature of DNA were basically unchanged in the presence of PL. The fluorescence intensity of PL–DNA decreased with increasing ionic strength. The value of K_a for PL with double‐stranded DNA (dsDNA) was larger than that for PL with single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA). All the results revealed that the binding mode was groove binding, and molecular docking further indicated that PL was preferentially bonded to A–T‐rich regions of DNA. The values for ΔH, ΔS and ΔG suggested that van der Waals forces or hydrogen bonding might be the main acting forces between PL and DNA. The binding distance was determined to be 3.37 nm based on the theory of Förster energy transference, which indicated that a non‐radiation energy transfer process occurred. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Oxidative DNA Damage Induced by a Copper(II)?1,10‐Phenanthroline?L‐Serine Complex in the Presence of Rutin

The capacity of the ternary complex copper(II)? 1,10‐phenanthroline? L ‐serine ([Cu? Phen? Ser]) to induce double‐strand scission of DNA was explored by agarose‐gel electrophoresis. It was found that the complex exhibited remarkable activity to damage DNA in the presence of rutin. Analysis of the UV and fluorescence spectra clearly demonstrated that the complex was bound to DNA by intercalation. Further, the occurrence of 8‐hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8‐OHdG), a biomarker of oxidative DNA damage, after the treatment of DNA by the complex in presence of rutin was evidenced by an electrochemical method. Finally, the mechanism of oxidative damage to double‐stranded DNA by the [Cu? Phen? Ser] complex in the presence of rutin was discussed.     

Studies on the genotoxic effect of chromium oxide (Cr VI): Interaction with deoxyribonucleic acid in solution

Chromium is a toxic and carcinogenic compound widely distributed in environment. In the present study we have investigated the interaction of chromium oxide with DNA employing UV/vis and fluorescence spectroscopy as well as Circular dichroism, thermal denaturation, retardation polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and DNA-cellulose affinity techniques. The results showed that the binding of chromium oxide to DNA is concentration dependent; at low concentration shows a little effect but ant higher concentrations (>100 μg/ml) reduced the absorbance at 260 and 210 nm producing hypochromicity. Also λ_max of the metal at 210, 260 and 350 nm was reduced. DNA chromophores quenched with the chromium oxide and decreased fluorescence emission intensity. Upon binding of the metal to DNA the elliplicity at positive extreme was decreased (275 nm) and increased the ellipticity of the DNA at negative extreme 245 nm. Thermal denaturation profile of DNA shifted to higher degrees upon chromium oxide binding which accompanied by hypochromicity. Also, affinity of chromium oxide to double stranded DNA was higher than single stranded DNA. From the result it is concluded that chromium oxide interacts with DNA via two modes of interaction inducing structural changes and DNA compaction evidence providing chromium oxide genotoxicity.