Evolution of Conifer Diterpene Synthases: Diterpene Resin Acid Biosynthesis in Lodgepole Pine and Jack Pine Involves Monofunctional and Bifunctional Diterpene Synthases

Abscisic acid (ABA) induces stomatal closure and inhibits light-induced stomatal opening. The mechanisms in these two processes are not necessarily the same. It has been postulated that the ABA receptors involved in opening inhibition are different from those involved in closure induction. Here, we provide evidence that four recently identified ABA receptors (PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE1 [PYR1], PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE-LIKE1 [PYL1], PYL2, and PYL4) are not sufficient for opening inhibition in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). ABA-induced stomatal closure was impaired in the pyr1/pyl1/pyl2/pyl4 quadruple ABA receptor mutant. ABA inhibition of the opening of the mutant’s stomata remained intact. ABA did not induce either the production of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide or the alkalization of the cytosol in the quadruple mutant, in accordance with the closure phenotype. Whole cell patch-clamp analysis of inward-rectifying K⁺ current in guard cells showed a partial inhibition by ABA, indicating that the ABA sensitivity of the mutant was not fully impaired. ABA substantially inhibited blue light-induced phosphorylation of H⁺-ATPase in guard cells in both the mutant and the wild type. On the other hand, in a knockout mutant of the SNF1-related protein kinase, srk2e, stomatal opening and closure, reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide production, cytosolic alkalization, inward-rectifying K⁺ current inactivation, and H⁺-ATPase phosphorylation were not sensitive to ABA.The phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA), which is synthesized in response to abiotic stresses, plays a key role in the drought hardiness of plants. Reducing transpirational water loss through stomatal pores is a major ABA response (Schroeder et al., 2001). ABA promotes the closure of open stomata and inhibits the opening of closed stomata. These effects are not simply the reverse of one another (Allen et al., 1999; Wang et al., 2001; Mishra et al., 2006).A class of receptors of ABA was identified (Ma et al., 2009; Park et al., 2009; Santiago et al., 2009; Nishimura et al., 2010). The sensitivity of stomata to ABA was strongly decreased in quadruple and sextuple mutants of the ABA receptor genes PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE/PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE-LIKE/REGULATORY COMPONENT OF ABSCISIC ACID RECEPTOR (PYR/PYL/RCAR; Nishimura et al., 2010; Gonzalez-Guzman et al., 2012). The PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors are involved in the early ABA signaling events, in which a sequence of interactions of the receptors with PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2Cs (PP2Cs) and subfamily 2 SNF1-RELATED PROTEIN KINASES (SnRK2s) leads to the activation of downstream ABA signaling targets in guard cells (Cutler et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2010; Weiner et al., 2010). Studies of Commelina communis and Vicia faba suggested that the ABA receptors involved in stomatal opening are not the same as the ABA receptors involved in stomatal closure (Allan et al., 1994; Anderson et al., 1994; Assmann, 1994; Schwartz et al., 1994). The roles of PYR/PYL/RCAR in either stomatal opening or closure remained to be elucidated.Blue light induces stomatal opening through the activation of plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase in guard cells that generates an inside-negative electrochemical gradient across the plasma membrane and drives K⁺ uptake through voltage-dependent inward-rectifying K⁺ channels (Assmann et al., 1985; Shimazaki et al., 1986; Blatt, 1987; Schroeder et al., 1987; Thiel et al., 1992). Phosphorylation of the penultimate Thr of the plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase is a prerequisite for blue light-induced activation of the H⁺-ATPase (Kinoshita and Shimazaki, 1999, 2002). ABA inhibits H⁺-ATPase activity through dephosphorylation of the penultimate Thr in the C terminus of the H⁺-ATPase in guard cells, resulting in prevention of the opening (Goh et al., 1996; Zhang et al., 2004; Hayashi et al., 2011). Inward-rectifying K⁺ currents (I_Kin) of guard cells are negatively regulated by ABA in addition to through the decline of the H⁺ pump-driven membrane potential difference (Schroeder and Hagiwara, 1989; Blatt, 1990; McAinsh et al., 1990; Schwartz et al., 1994; Grabov and Blatt, 1999; Saito et al., 2008). This down-regulation of ion transporters by ABA is essential for the inhibition of stomatal opening.A series of second messengers has been shown to mediate ABA-induced stomatal closure. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by NADPH oxidases play a crucial role in ABA signaling in guard cells (Pei et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 2001; Kwak et al., 2003; Sirichandra et al., 2009; Jannat et al., 2011). Nitric oxide (NO) is an essential signaling component in ABA-induced stomatal closure (Desikan et al., 2002; Guo et al., 2003; Garcia-Mata and Lamattina, 2007; Neill et al., 2008). Alkalization of cytosolic pH in guard cells is postulated to mediate ABA-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and Pisum sativum and Paphiopedilum species (Irving et al., 1992; Gehring et al., 1997; Grabov and Blatt, 1997; Suhita et al., 2004; Gonugunta et al., 2008). These second messengers transduce environmental signals to ion channels and ion transporters that create the driving force for stomatal movements (Ward et al., 1995; MacRobbie, 1998; Garcia-Mata et al., 2003).In this study, we examined the mobilization of second messengers, the inactivation of I_Kin, and the suppression of H⁺-ATPase phosphorylation evoked by ABA in Arabidopsis mutants to clarify the downstream signaling events of ABA signaling in guard cells. The mutants included a quadruple mutant of PYR/PYL/RCARs, pyr1/pyl1/pyl2/pyl4, and a mutant of a SnRK2 kinase, srk2e.     

Expansive Evolution of the TREHALOSE-6-PHOSPHATE PHOSPHATASE Gene Family in Arabidopsis

Trehalose is a nonreducing sugar used as a reserve carbohydrate and stress protectant in a variety of organisms. While higher plants typically do not accumulate high levels of trehalose, they encode large families of putative trehalose biosynthesis genes. Trehalose biosynthesis in plants involves a two-step reaction in which trehalose-6-phosphate (T6P) is synthesized from UDP-glucose and glucose-6-phosphate (catalyzed by T6P synthase [TPS]), and subsequently dephosphorylated to produce the disaccharide trehalose (catalyzed by T6P phosphatase [TPP]). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), 11 genes encode proteins with both TPS- and TPP-like domains but only one of these (AtTPS1) appears to be an active (TPS) enzyme. In addition, plants contain a large family of smaller proteins with a conserved TPP domain. Here, we present an in-depth analysis of the 10 TPP genes and gene products in Arabidopsis (TPPA-TPPJ). Collinearity analysis revealed that all of these genes originate from whole-genome duplication events. Heterologous expression in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) showed that all encode active TPP enzymes with an essential role for some conserved residues in the catalytic domain. These results suggest that the TPP genes function in the regulation of T6P levels, with T6P emerging as a novel key regulator of growth and development in higher plants. Extensive gene expression analyses using a complete set of promoter-β-glucuronidase/green fluorescent protein reporter lines further uncovered cell- and tissue-specific expression patterns, conferring spatiotemporal control of trehalose metabolism. Consistently, phenotypic characterization of knockdown and overexpression lines of a single TPP, AtTPPG, points to unique properties of individual TPPs in Arabidopsis, and underlines the intimate connection between trehalose metabolism and abscisic acid signaling.The presence of trehalose in a wide variety of organisms and the existence of different biosynthesis pathways suggest a pivotal and ancient role for trehalose metabolism in nature. The most widely distributed metabolic pathway consists of two consecutive enzymatic reactions, with trehalose-6-phosphate (T6P) synthase (TPS) catalyzing the transfer of a glucosyl moiety from UDP-Glc to Glc-6-phosphate to produce T6P and UDP, and T6P phosphatase (TPP) catalyzing dephosphorylation of T6P to trehalose (Cabib and Leloir, 1958; Avonce et al., 2006). Apart from operating as a (reserve) carbon source and structural component in bacteria, fungi, and invertebrates, trehalose also functions as a major stress protectant of proteins and membranes during adverse conditions such as dehydration, high salinity, hypoxia, and nutrient starvation (Elbein et al., 2003). Trehalose accumulation is also observed in a few lower vascular resurrection plants (e.g. Selaginella lepidophylla). Until about a decade ago, higher vascular plants were believed to have lost the ability to produce trehalose, but with the emergence of more sensitive assays, genome sequencing, and the use of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) mutant complementation, minute amounts of trehalose and T6P, and functional plant enzyme orthologs were found (Goddijn et al., 1997; Vogel et al., 1998; Lunn et al., 2006). In addition, heterologous expression and disruption of trehalose metabolism in plants conferred pleiotropic effects, ranging from altered stress tolerance, leaf morphology, and developmental timing to embryo lethality (Holmström et al., 1996; Goddijn et al., 1997; Romero et al., 1997; Eastmond et al., 2002; Schluepmann et al., 2003; Avonce et al., 2004; Satoh-Nagasawa et al., 2006; Miranda et al., 2007; Chary et al., 2008), pointing to an important regulatory function. The intermediate T6P has been highlighted as a novel signal for carbohydrate status (for review, see Paul, 2008), positively correlating with Suc levels, redox-regulated ADP-Glc pyrophosphorylase activity, and starch biosynthesis (Lunn et al., 2006). Recently, it was reported that T6P inhibits the activity of the SnRK1 protein kinase to activate energy-consuming biosynthetic processes in growing tissue (Zhang et al., 2009) and that it is required for the onset of leaf senescence (Wingler et al., 2012).In most bacterial and eukaryotic species, the TPS and TPP activities are found on separate proteins. Recent phylogenetic and biochemical analyses showed that some archaea and bacteria, such as Cytophaga hutchinsonii, express proteins that have both active TPS and TPP domains resulting from gene fusion, suggesting that such prokaryotic bifunctional proteins are the evolutionary ancestors of the large eukaryotic trehalose biosynthesis enzymes in which one or both domains have subsequently lost their catalytic activity (Avonce et al., 2010). The yeast TPP enzyme Tps2, for example, harbors an inactive N-terminal TPS domain and an active C-terminal TPP domain. In contrast to the single TPS and TPP genes in most microorganisms, the genomes of higher plants encode a remarkably large family of putative trehalose biosynthesis enzyme homologs. These are commonly classified in three distinct subgroups, according to their similarity to the microbial TPS and TPP proteins and/or presence of specific motifs (e.g. conserved phosphatase boxes; Thaller et al., 1998; Leyman et al., 2001; Eastmond et al., 2003). Even primitive plants such as the alga Ostreococcus tauri and the moss Physcomitrella patens already contain members of each of these gene families, pointing to the early establishment and conservation of these proteins in plant evolution (Lunn, 2007; Avonce et al., 2010). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the class I TPS proteins (AtTPS1-4) show most similarity to the yeast TPS Tps1, but also have a C-terminal domain with limited similarity to TPPs. However, only one of these, AtTPS1, appears to have heterologous enzymatic TPS activity in yeast (Blázquez et al., 1998; Vandesteene et al., 2010). Strikingly, AtTPS1 is the only class I enzyme with an N-terminal extension that seems to operate as an autoinhibitory domain (Van Dijck et al., 2002). The class II TPS proteins (AtTPS5-11) are similar bipartite proteins with a TPS-like domain but a more conserved TPP domain. They appear to lack both heterologous TPS and TPP activity (Ramon et al., 2009). The high level of conservation of putative substrate-binding residues in class I and class II proteins, however, suggests that substrates might still bind (Avonce et al., 2006; Lunn, 2007; Ramon et al., 2009; Vandesteene et al., 2010). Together with the specific expression patterns of the class I genes (van Dijken et al., 2004; Geelen et al., 2007; Vandesteene et al., 2010) and the extensive expression regulation of all class II members by plant carbon status (Baena-González et al., 2007; Usadel et al., 2008; Ramon et al., 2009), this suggests tissue-specific regulatory functions for these proteins in metabolic regulation of plant growth and development. Finally, Arabidopsis also harbors a family of 10 smaller proteins (AtTPPA-J; 320–385 amino acids) with limited similarity to the class I and class II proteins (795–942 amino acids). Like class II proteins, they contain the phosphatase box consensus sequences, characteristic of the l-2-haloacid dehalogenase (HAD) super family of enzymes, which includes a wide range of phosphatases and hydrolases (Thaller et al., 1998). It has been suggested that the origin of these plant TPP genes is different from the origin of the class I and II genes (Avonce et al., 2010) and that plants recruited the TPP genes after their divergence from fungi, most probably from proteobacteria or actinobacteria. Consistently, homologous TPP proteins are present in proteobacteria such as Rhodopherax ferrireducens (Avonce et al., 2010). To date, only a few of these single-domain plant TPP proteins have been subject to biochemical characterization, e.g. TPPA and TPPB from Arabidopsis (Vogel et al., 1998), OsTPP1 and OsTPP2 from rice (Oryza sativa; Pramanik and Imai, 2005; Shima et al., 2007), and RAMOSA3 (RA3) from maize (Zea mays; Satoh-Nagasawa et al., 2006).The phenotypic alterations observed in plants fed with trehalose or genetically modified in trehalose biosynthesis, suggest a pivotal role for trehalose metabolism in integrating the metabolic status with growth and development. Disruption of the only known active TPS enzyme in Arabidopsis (AtTPS1) results in embryo lethality (Eastmond et al., 2002) and, when rescued to bridge embryogenesis, causes a strong disruption of vegetative and generative development and abscisic acid (ABA) hypersensitivity (van Dijken et al., 2004; Gómez et al., 2010). Overexpressing AtTPS1 on the other hand renders seedlings sugar and ABA insensitive (Avonce et al., 2004, 2005). These observations strongly link trehalose metabolism with ABA signaling. Interestingly, a mutation of a TPP gene in maize, RA3, results in a distinct phenotype, with incorrect axillary meristem identity and determinacy in both male and female inflorescences (Satoh-Nagasawa et al., 2006). Arabidopsis plants with overall increased T6P levels, such as OtsA (Escherichia coli TPS) overexpression plants, similarly show increased inflorescence branching (Schluepmann et al., 2003; van Dijken et al., 2004).To better understand why higher plants harbor such a large number of putative TPP proteins, we have made a comprehensive study of the 10 Arabidopsis TPP genes and gene products, combining phylogenetic approaches and yeast growth complementation assays, together with a detailed analysis of all 10 TPP gene expression profiles in Arabidopsis, and a more detailed single AtTPP mutant phenotypic analysis.     

Functional Genomics Reveals That a Compact Terpene Synthase Gene Family Can Account for Terpene Volatile Production in Apple

Terpenes are specialized plant metabolites that act as attractants to pollinators and as defensive compounds against pathogens and herbivores, but they also play an important role in determining the quality of horticultural food products. We show that the genome of cultivated apple (Malus domestica) contains 55 putative terpene synthase (TPS) genes, of which only 10 are predicted to be functional. This low number of predicted functional TPS genes compared with other plant species was supported by the identification of only eight potentially functional TPS enzymes in apple ‘Royal Gala’ expressed sequence tag databases, including the previously characterized apple (E,E)-α-farnesene synthase. In planta functional characterization of these TPS enzymes showed that they could account for the majority of terpene volatiles produced in cv Royal Gala, including the sesquiterpenes germacrene-D and (E)-β-caryophyllene, the monoterpenes linalool and α-pinene, and the homoterpene (E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene. Relative expression analysis of the TPS genes indicated that floral and vegetative tissues were the primary sites of terpene production in cv Royal Gala. However, production of cv Royal Gala floral-specific terpenes and TPS genes was observed in the fruit of some heritage apple cultivars. Our results suggest that the apple TPS gene family has been shaped by a combination of ancestral and more recent genome-wide duplication events. The relatively small number of functional enzymes suggests that the remaining terpenes produced in floral and vegetative and fruit tissues are maintained under a positive selective pressure, while the small number of terpenes found in the fruit of modern cultivars may be related to commercial breeding strategies.Terpenes (also referred to as terpenoids or isoprenoids) constitute a large class of plant natural products with highly diversified functionality. Terpenes serve as precursors for the biosynthesis of essential plant metabolites (Croteau et al., 2000), including those involved in growth regulation (GAs, abscisic acid, and strigolactones), membrane stabilization (sterols), photosynthesis (carotenoids and the phytol side chain of chlorophyll), and electron transport coenzymes (ubiquinone and plastoquinone). Primarily, however, terpenes function as specialized plant metabolites that operate as attractants to pollinators or as defensive compounds against pathogens and herbivores (Kessler and Baldwin, 2001; Pichersky and Gershenzon, 2002). Terpenes are also important in determining the quality of horticultural food products, including the taste and aroma of wine (Styger et al., 2011) and fruit crops such as Citrus spp. (Vora et al., 1983; Maccarone et al., 1998; Aharoni et al., 2004) and strawberry (Fragaria spp.; Aharoni et al., 2004).Terpenes are derived from linear assemblages of prenyldiphosphates, including the C10 monoterpene precursor geranyl diphosphate (GDP), the C15 sesquiterpene precursor farnesyl diphosphate (FDP), and the C20 diterpene precursor geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGDP). The catalytic conversion of these relatively simple precursors to the diverse array of terpenes seen in nature is carried out by terpene synthase (TPS) enzymes, which have the capacity to direct myriad precursor-binding conformations through subtle variations in their conserved catalytic fold (Yoshikuni et al., 2006; O’Maille et al., 2008; Miller and Allemann, 2012).TPS gene families have been explored in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Aubourg et al., 2002; Lange and Ghassemian, 2003), grape (Vitis vinifera; Martin et al., 2010), poplar (Populus trichocarpa; Tuskan et al., 2006), rice (Oryza sativa; Goff et al., 2002), and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor; Paterson et al., 2009) as well as most recently in cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum; Bleeker et al., 2011; Falara et al., 2011). The identification of 44 tomato TPS genes concurs with the comparative genome analysis work of Chen et al. (2011), indicating that the plant TPS gene family is midsized, with gene numbers ranging from approximately 20 to 150. The only exception so far appears to be the moss Physcomitrella patens, which has a single functional TPS gene (Chen et al., 2011). This analysis has also extended the phylogenetics used to define the initial TPS subfamilies (TPS-a to TPS-g; Bohlmann et al., 1998; Dudareva et al., 2003; Martin et al., 2004), culminating in the merging of the TPS-e and TPS-f subgroups (comprising gymnosperm and angiosperm ent-kaurene genes associated with primary metabolism) and the TPS-h subgroup so far specific to the lycopod Selaginalla moellendorffii.The domestic apple (Malus domestica), which has long been recognized by consumers for its flavor, health, and nutritional properties (Harker et al., 2003), is one of the most widely cultivated fruit species in the world’s temperate regions. Apple belongs to the Rosaceae family, and while most Rosaceae have a haploid chromosome number of seven, eight, or nine, Malus spp., as the result of a relatively recent genome-wide duplication (GWD) event in the Pyreae, have transitioned from nine ancestral chromosomes to 17 chromosomes (Velasco et al., 2010).Apple fruit produce more than 300 volatile organic compounds (VOCs), including alcohols, aldehyde esters, and ketones (Dimick and Hoskin, 1983; Paillard, 1990; Dixon and Hewett, 2000). Various terpenes have also been identified, although they only contribute a relatively minor component of total VOCs produced (Rapparini et al., 2001; Fuhrmann and Grosch, 2002; Hern and Dorn, 2003; Rowan et al., 2009a). The specific VOC composition in apple depends on several factors, including cultivar, climacteric ethylene production levels, maturity, and environmental conditions (Loughrin et al., 1990; Dixon and Hewett, 2000; Rapparini et al., 2001; Vallat et al., 2005). While the acyclic branched sesquiterpene (E,E)-α-farnesene appears to be the predominant terpene volatile associated with ripe fruit (Sutherland et al., 1977; Bengtsson et al., 2001; Hern and Dorn, 2003; Ferreira et al., 2009; Rowan et al., 2009b), various monoterpenes, cyclic sesquiterpenes, and terpene derivatives have also been identified, particularly in floral and vegetative tissues (Takabayashi et al., 1991; Bengtsson et al., 2001; Rapparini et al., 2001; Vallat and Dorn, 2005). Although many of these compounds are constitutively produced in relatively low amounts, a subset of common apple terpenes either are induced in response to insect infestation or have been observed to affect apple pest behavior directly. For example, (E)-β-ocimene is induced in immature apple fruit following infestation by codling moth (Cydia pomonella) larvae (Hern and Dorn, 2002), while (E,E)-α-farnesene exerts a concentration-dependent sexually dimorphic response in adult codling moth, attracting mated females at low dosages and repelling them at high dosages, while only attracting mated males at high dosages (Hern and Dorn, 1999). The relative abundance and diversity of terpenes in floral and vegetative tissues compared with ripe fruit suggests that these compounds are more likely to participate in defense and pollinator attraction roles rather than to attract seed dispersers or contribute to fruit flavor and aroma.Despite numerous studies on apple terpene volatile production, to our knowledge the only reported apple TPS enzyme to be functionally characterized is that of the α-farnesene synthase (AFS1/MdAFS1; Rupasinghe et al., 2000; Pechous and Whitaker, 2004; Green et al., 2007). The recent availability of the draft sequence assembly of the apple genome (Velasco et al., 2010), combined with a large number of accessible apple ESTs, provided an opportunity to extend the current knowledge on the organization and functional annotation of the apple TPS gene family. In this study, we initially survey the volatile terpenes produced in cv Royal Gala and then use available apple genomic and EST information to identify candidate TPS genes for functional characterization and quantitative expression analysis. We show that only a small number of the TPS genes in the apple genome encode functional TPS enzymes, but these enzymes can account for the diversity of terpenes present in apple. Our results also provide insight into how this small but evolutionarily conserved family was shaped by GWD events and how the range of terpenes has been influenced by selective pressures and commercial breeding strategies.     

Overexpression of Arabidopsis Ceramide Synthases Differentially Affects Growth,Sphingolipid Metabolism,Programmed Cell Death,and Mycotoxin Resistance

Ceramide synthases catalyze an N-acyltransferase reaction using fatty acyl-coenzyme A (CoA) and long-chain base (LCB) substrates to form the sphingolipid ceramide backbone and are targets for inhibition by the mycotoxin fumonisin B₁ (FB₁). Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) contains three genes encoding ceramide synthases with distinct substrate specificities: LONGEVITY ASSURANCE GENE ONE HOMOLOG1 (LOH1; At3g25540)- and LOH3 (At1g19260)-encoded ceramide synthases use very-long-chain fatty acyl-CoA and trihydroxy LCB substrates, and LOH2 (At3g19260)-encoded ceramide synthase uses palmitoyl-CoA and dihydroxy LCB substrates. In this study, complementary DNAs for each gene were overexpressed to determine the role of individual isoforms in physiology and sphingolipid metabolism. Differences were observed in growth resulting from LOH1 and LOH3 overexpression compared with LOH2 overexpression. LOH1- and LOH3-overexpressing plants had enhanced biomass relative to wild-type plants, due in part to increased cell division, suggesting that enhanced synthesis of very-long-chain fatty acid/trihydroxy LCB ceramides promotes cell division and growth. Conversely, LOH2 overexpression resulted in dwarfing. LOH2 overexpression also resulted in the accumulation of sphingolipids with C16 fatty acid/dihydroxy LCB ceramides, constitutive induction of programmed cell death, and accumulation of salicylic acid, closely mimicking phenotypes observed previously in LCB C-4 hydroxylase mutants defective in trihydroxy LCB synthesis. In addition, LOH2- and LOH3-overexpressing plants acquired increased resistance to FB₁, whereas LOH1-overexpressing plants showed no increase in FB₁ resistance, compared with wild-type plants, indicating that LOH1 ceramide synthase is most strongly inhibited by FB₁. Overall, the findings described here demonstrate that overexpression of Arabidopsis ceramide synthases results in strongly divergent physiological and metabolic phenotypes, some of which have significance for improved plant performance.Ceramides are central intermediates in sphingolipid biosynthesis and mediators of programmed cell death (PCD) in plants (Dunn et al., 2004; Saucedo-García et al., 2011; Ternes et al., 2011a). Ceramides are synthesized by ceramide synthase (or sphingosine N-acyltransferase; EC 2.3.1.24), which catalyzes the formation of an amide linkage between a sphingoid long-chain base (LCB) and a fatty acid using LCB and fatty acyl-CoA substrates (Mullen et al., 2012). The LCB substrate can have two or three hydroxyl groups that are referred to as dihydroxy or trihydroxy LCBs, respectively (Chen et al., 2010). The fatty acyl-CoA substrates typically have chain lengths of C16 or C22 to C26 (Dunn et al., 2004). The latter are referred to as very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs). The ceramide product of ceramide synthase is used primarily as a substrate for the synthesis of either of the two major glycosphingolipids found in plants: glucosylceramide (GlcCer) and glycosyl inositolphosphoceramide (GIPC; Chen et al., 2010). These glycosphingolipids are major structural components of the plasma membrane and other endomembranes of plant cells (Verhoek et al., 1983; Sperling et al., 2005). In this role, they contribute to membrane physical properties that are important for the ability of plant cells to adjust to environmental extremes and to Golgi-mediated protein trafficking of proteins, including cell wall metabolic enzymes and auxin transporters that underlie plant growth (Borner et al., 2005; Markham et al., 2011; Mortimer et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2013). Alternatively, ceramides can be converted to ceramide-1-phosphates by ceramide kinase activity (Liang et al., 2003). The interchange of ceramides between their free and phosphorylated forms has been linked to the regulation of PCD and PCD-associated resistance to pathogens via the hypersensitive response (HR; Liang et al., 2003; Bi et al., 2014; Simanshu et al., 2014).The Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genome contains three ceramide synthase genes denoted LONGEVITY ASSURANCE GENE ONE HOMOLOG1 (LOH1; At3g25540), LOH2 (At3g19260), and LOH3 (At1g13580; Markham et al., 2011; Ternes et al., 2011a). These studies suggest that LOH1 and LOH3 polypeptides are structurally related and catalyze primarily the amidation reaction of trihydroxy LCBs and CoA esters of VLCFAs. The LOH2 polypeptide is more distantly related to LOH1 and LOH3 and catalyzes primarily the condensation of dihydroxy LCBs and C16 fatty acyl-CoAs (Chen et al., 2008; Markham et al., 2011; Ternes et al., 2011a). The ceramide products of LOH1 and LOH3 are most prevalent in GIPC, whereas the ceramide products of LOH2 are more enriched in GlcCer (Markham and Jaworski, 2007; Chen et al., 2008; Ternes et al., 2011b). Similar to plants, the six ceramide synthase isoforms found in humans and mice have distinct specificities for their LCB and acyl-CoA substrates, and these specificities contribute to the formation of complex sphingolipids with differing structures and functions (Venkataraman et al., 2002; Riebeling et al., 2003; Mizutani et al., 2005, 2006; Laviad et al., 2008).In Arabidopsis, LOH1 and LOH3 are partially redundant, but the combined activities of the corresponding polypeptides are essential for plant cell viability, as null double mutants of these genes are lethal (Markham et al., 2011). In contrast, mutants of LOH2 are viable and display no apparent growth phenotype, which brings into question the role of LOH2 ceramide synthase in plant performance (Markham et al., 2011; Ternes et al., 2011a). Overall, these observations indicate that sphingolipids with LOH1-/LOH3-derived trihydroxy LCBs and VLCFA ceramides are essential, but LOH2-derived dihydroxy LCBs and C16 fatty acid ceramides are not required by plant cells. Related to this, LCB C-4 hydroxylase mutants that are deficient in trihydroxy LCBs accumulate elevated amounts of sphingolipids with dihydroxy LCB- and C16 fatty acid-containing ceramides via LOH2 activity (Chen et al., 2008). These mutants are severely impaired in growth and do not transition from vegetative to reproductive growth (Chen et al., 2008).Ceramide synthases are known targets for competitive inhibition by sphingosine analog mycotoxins, including fumonisin B₁ (FB₁) and AAL toxin, produced by pathogenic fungi such as various Fusarium spp. and Alternaria alternata f. sp. lycopersici (Abbas et al., 1994). Inhibition of ceramide synthase results in the accumulation of LCBs that are believed to trigger PCD and result in cytotoxicity (Abbas et al., 1994). In studies of LOH mutants, treatment of Arabidopsis seedlings with FB₁ resulted in not only increases in LCBs but also increases in C16 fatty acid-containing sphingolipids and decreases in VLCFA-containing sphingolipids (Markham et al., 2011; Ternes et al., 2011a). The interpretation of this observation was that FB₁ preferentially inhibits LOH1 and LOH3 ceramide synthases but inhibits LOH2 ceramide synthase to a lesser extent (Markham et al., 2011; Ternes et al., 2011a).Given the findings from Arabidopsis mutants that LOH1 and LOH3 ceramide synthases have distinct substrate specificities and sensitivity to FB₁ relative to LOH2, we hypothesized that the overexpression of each of these ceramide synthases would lead to the production of different sphingolipid compositions as well as different growth phenotypes. This report details experiments designed to test this hypothesis. Among the results presented is a large divergence in the effects of the overexpression of LOH1 and LOH3 versus LOH2 on the growth of Arabidopsis. LOH2 overexpression was also shown to result in sphingolipid compositional, growth, and physiological phenotypes that closely mimic those observed previously in LCB C-4 hydroxylase mutants (Chen et al., 2008).     

Spore Density Determines Infection Strategy by the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina

Necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens are resisted by different plant defenses. While necrotrophic pathogens are sensitive to jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent resistance, biotrophic pathogens are resisted by salicylic acid (SA)- and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent resistance. Although many pathogens switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy during infection, little is known about the signals triggering this transition. This study is based on the observation that the early colonization pattern and symptom development by the ascomycete pathogen Plectosphaerella cucumerina (P. cucumerina) vary between inoculation methods. Using the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) defense response as a proxy for infection strategy, we examined whether P. cucumerina alternates between hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic lifestyles, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf surface. Untargeted metabolome analysis revealed profound differences in metabolic defense signatures upon different inoculation methods. Quantification of JA and SA, marker gene expression, and cell death confirmed that infection from high spore densities activates JA-dependent defenses with excessive cell death, while infection from low spore densities induces SA-dependent defenses with lower levels of cell death. Phenotyping of Arabidopsis mutants in JA, SA, and ROS signaling confirmed that P. cucumerina is differentially resisted by JA- and SA/ROS-dependent defenses, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf. Furthermore, in situ staining for early callose deposition at the infection sites revealed that necrotrophy by P. cucumerina is associated with elevated host defense. We conclude that P. cucumerina adapts to early-acting plant defenses by switching from a hemibiotrophic to a necrotrophic infection program, thereby gaining an advantage of immunity-related cell death in the host.Plant pathogens are often classified as necrotrophic or biotrophic, depending on their infection strategy (Glazebrook, 2005; Nishimura and Dangl, 2010). Necrotrophic pathogens kill living host cells and use the decayed plant tissue as a substrate to colonize the plant, whereas biotrophic pathogens parasitize living plant cells by employing effector molecules that suppress the host immune system (Pel and Pieterse, 2013). Despite this binary classification, the majority of pathogenic microbes employ a hemibiotrophic infection strategy, which is characterized by an initial biotrophic phase followed by a necrotrophic infection strategy at later stages of infection (Perfect and Green, 2001). The pathogenic fungi Magnaporthe grisea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Mycosphaerella graminicola, the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae are examples of hemibiotrophic plant pathogens (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011; van Kan et al., 2014; Kabbage et al., 2015).Despite considerable progress in our understanding of plant resistance to necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens (Glazebrook, 2005; Mengiste, 2012; Lai and Mengiste, 2013), recent debate highlights the dynamic and complex interplay between plant-pathogenic microbes and their hosts, which is raising concerns about the use of infection strategies as a static tool to classify plant pathogens. For instance, the fungal genus Botrytis is often labeled as an archetypal necrotroph, even though there is evidence that it can behave as an endophytic fungus with a biotrophic lifestyle (van Kan et al., 2014). The rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, which is often classified as a hemibiotrophic leaf pathogen (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011), can adopt a purely biotrophic lifestyle when infecting root tissues (Marcel et al., 2010). It remains unclear which signals are responsible for the switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy and whether these signals rely solely on the physiological state of the pathogen, or whether host-derived signals play a role as well (Kabbage et al., 2015).The plant hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) play a central role in the activation of plant defenses (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012). The first evidence that biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens are resisted by different immune responses came from Thomma et al. (1998), who demonstrated that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genotypes impaired in SA signaling show enhanced susceptibility to the biotrophic pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (formerly known as Peronospora parastitica), while JA-insensitive genotypes were more susceptible to the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola. In subsequent years, the differential effectiveness of SA- and JA-dependent defense mechanisms has been confirmed in different plant-pathogen interactions, while additional plant hormones, such as ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA), auxins, and cytokinins, have emerged as regulators of SA- and JA-dependent defenses (Bari and Jones, 2009; Cao et al., 2011; Pieterse et al., 2012). Moreover, SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways have been shown to act antagonistically on each other, which allows plants to prioritize an appropriate defense response to attack by biotrophic pathogens, necrotrophic pathogens, or herbivores (Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008; Pieterse et al., 2009; Verhage et al., 2010).In addition to plant hormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important regulatory role in plant defenses (Torres et al., 2006; Lehmann et al., 2015). Within minutes after the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, NADPH oxidases and apoplastic peroxidases generate early ROS bursts (Torres et al., 2002; Daudi et al., 2012; O’Brien et al., 2012), which activate downstream defense signaling cascades (Apel and Hirt, 2004; Torres et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2009; Mittler et al., 2011; Lehmann et al., 2015). ROS play an important regulatory role in the deposition of callose (Luna et al., 2011; Pastor et al., 2013) and can also stimulate SA-dependent defenses (Chaouch et al., 2010; Yun and Chen, 2011; Wang et al., 2014; Mammarella et al., 2015). However, the spread of SA-induced apoptosis during hyperstimulation of the plant immune system is contained by the ROS-generating NADPH oxidase RBOHD (Torres et al., 2005), presumably to allow for the sufficient generation of SA-dependent defense signals from living cells that are adjacent to apoptotic cells. Nitric oxide (NO) plays an additional role in the regulation of SA/ROS-dependent defense (Trapet et al., 2015). This gaseous molecule can stimulate ROS production and cell death in the absence of SA while preventing excessive ROS production at high cellular SA levels via S-nitrosylation of RBOHD (Yun et al., 2011). Recently, it was shown that pathogen-induced accumulation of NO and ROS promotes the production of azelaic acid, a lipid derivative that primes distal plants for SA-dependent defenses (Wang et al., 2014). Hence, NO, ROS, and SA are intertwined in a complex regulatory network to mount local and systemic resistance against biotrophic pathogens. Interestingly, pathogens with a necrotrophic lifestyle can benefit from ROS/SA-dependent defenses and associated cell death (Govrin and Levine, 2000). For instance, Kabbage et al. (2013) demonstrated that S. sclerotiorum utilizes oxalic acid to repress oxidative defense signaling during initial biotrophic colonization, but it stimulates apoptosis at later stages to advance necrotrophic colonization. Moreover, SA-induced repression of JA-dependent resistance not only benefits necrotrophic pathogens but also hemibiotrophic pathogens after having switched from biotrophy to necrotrophy (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012).Plectosphaerella cucumerina ((P. cucumerina, anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) is a filamentous ascomycete fungus that can survive saprophytically in soil by decomposing plant material (Palm et al., 1995). The fungus can cause sudden death and blight disease in a variety of crops (Chen et al., 1999; Harrington et al., 2000). Because P. cucumerina can infect Arabidopsis leaves, the P. cucumerina-Arabidopsis interaction has emerged as a popular model system in which to study plant defense reactions to necrotrophic fungi (Berrocal-Lobo et al., 2002; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Carlucci et al., 2012; Ramos et al., 2013). Various studies have shown that Arabidopsis deploys a wide range of inducible defense strategies against P. cucumerina, including JA-, SA-, ABA-, and auxin-dependent defenses, glucosinolates (Tierens et al., 2001; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014), callose deposition (García-Andrade et al., 2011; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012), and ROS (Tierens et al., 2002; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Barna et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Recent metabolomics studies have revealed large-scale metabolic changes in P. cucumerina-infected Arabidopsis, presumably to mobilize chemical defenses (Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Furthermore, various chemical agents have been reported to induce resistance against P. cucumerina. These chemicals include β-amino-butyric acid, which primes callose deposition and SA-dependent defenses, benzothiadiazole (BTH or Bion; Görlach et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), which activates SA-related defenses (Lawton et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Gamir et al., 2014; Luna et al., 2014), JA (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), and ABA, which primes ROS and callose deposition (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Pastor et al., 2013). However, among all these studies, there is increasing controversy about the exact signaling pathways and defense responses contributing to plant resistance against P. cucumerina. While it is clear that JA and ethylene contribute to basal resistance against the fungus, the exact roles of SA, ABA, and ROS in P. cucumerina resistance vary between studies (Thomma et al., 1998; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2014).This study is based on the observation that the disease phenotype during P. cucumerina infection differs according to the inoculation method used. We provide evidence that the fungus follows a hemibiotrophic infection strategy when infecting from relatively low spore densities on the leaf surface. By contrast, when challenged by localized host defense to relatively high spore densities, the fungus switches to a necrotrophic infection program. Our study has uncovered a novel strategy by which plant-pathogenic fungi can take advantage of the early immune response in the host plant.     

Disruption of Fumarylacetoacetate Hydrolase Causes Spontaneous Cell Death under Short-Day Conditions in Arabidopsis

Fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase (FAH) hydrolyzes fumarylacetoacetate to fumarate and acetoacetate, the final step in the tyrosine (Tyr) degradation pathway that is essential to animals. Deficiency of FAH in animals results in an inborn lethal disorder. However, the role for the Tyr degradation pathway in plants remains to be elucidated. In this study, we isolated an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) short-day sensitive cell death1 (sscd1) mutant that displays a spontaneous cell death phenotype under short-day conditions. The SSCD1 gene was cloned via a map-based cloning approach and found to encode an Arabidopsis putative FAH. The spontaneous cell death phenotype of the sscd1 mutant was completely eliminated by further knockout of the gene encoding the putative homogentisate dioxygenase, which catalyzes homogentisate into maleylacetoacetate (the antepenultimate step) in the Tyr degradation pathway. Furthermore, treatment of Arabidopsis wild-type seedlings with succinylacetone, an abnormal metabolite caused by loss of FAH in the Tyr degradation pathway, mimicked the sscd1 cell death phenotype. These results demonstrate that disruption of FAH leads to cell death in Arabidopsis and suggest that the Tyr degradation pathway is essential for plant survival under short-day conditions.Programmed cell death (PCD) has been defined as a sequence of genetically regulated events that lead to the elimination of specific cells, tissues, or whole organs (Lockshin and Zakeri, 2004). In plants, PCD is essential for developmental processes and defense responses (Dangl et al., 1996; Greenberg, 1996; Durrant et al., 2007). One well-characterized example of plant PCD is the hypersensitive response occurring during incompatible plant-pathogen interactions (Lam, 2004), which results in cell death to form visible lesions at the site of infection by an avirulent pathogen and consequently limits the pathogen spread (Morel and Dangl, 1997).To date, a large number of mutants that display spontaneous cell death lesions have been identified in barley (Hordeum vulgare), maize (Zea mays), rice (Oryza sativa), and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Marchetti et al., 1983; Wolter et al., 1993; Dietrich et al., 1994; Gray et al., 1997). Because lesions form in the absence of pathogen infection, these mutants have been collectively termed as lesion-mimic mutants. Many genes with regulatory roles in PCD and defense responses, including LESION SIMULATING DISEASE1, ACCELERATED CELL DEATH11, and VASCULAR ASSOCIATED DEATH1, have been cloned and characterized (Dietrich et al., 1997; Brodersen et al., 2002; Lorrain et al., 2004).The appearance of spontaneous cell death lesions in some lesion-mimic mutants is dependent on photoperiod. For example, the Arabidopsis mutant lesion simulating disease1 and myoinositol-1-phosphate synthase1 show lesions under long days (LD; Dietrich et al., 1994; Meng et al., 2009), whereas the lesion simulating disease2, lesion initiation1, enhancing RPW8-mediated HR-like cell death1, and lag one homolog1 display lesions under short days (SD; Dietrich et al., 1994; Ishikawa et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2008; Ternes et al., 2011).Blockage of some metabolic pathways in plants may cause cell death and result in lesion formation. For example, the lesion-mimic phenotypes in the Arabidopsis mutants lesion initiation2 and accelerated cell death2 and the maize mutant lesion mimic22 result from an impairment of porphyrin metabolism (Hu et al., 1998; Ishikawa et al., 2001; Mach et al., 2001). Deficiency in fatty acid, sphingolipid, and myoinositol metabolism also causes cell death in Arabidopsis (Mou et al., 2000; Liang et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2008; Meng et al., 2009; Donahue et al., 2010; Berkey et al., 2012).Tyr degradation is an essential five-step pathway in animals (Lindblad et al., 1977). First, Tyr aminotransferase catalyzes the conversion of Tyr into 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate, which is further transformed into homogentisate by 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase. Through the sequential action of homogentisate dioxygenase (HGO), maleylacetoacetate isomerase (MAAI), and fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase (FAH), homogentisate is catalyzed to generate fumarate and acetoacetate (Lindblad et al., 1977). Blockage of this pathway in animals results in metabolic disorder diseases (Lindblad et al., 1977; Ruppert et al., 1992; Grompe et al., 1993). For example, human FAH deficiency causes hereditary tyrosinemia type I (HT1), an inborn lethal disease (St-Louis and Tanguay, 1997). Although the homologous genes putatively encoding these enzymes exist in plants (Dixon et al., 2000; Lopukhina et al., 2001; Dixon and Edwards, 2006), it is unclear whether this pathway is essential for plant growth and development.In this study, we report the isolation and characterization of a recessive short-day sensitive cell death1 (sscd1) mutant in Arabidopsis. Map-based cloning of the corresponding gene revealed that SSCD1 encodes the Arabidopsis putative FAH. Further knockout of the gene encoding the Arabidopsis putative HGO completely eliminated the spontaneous cell death phenotype in the sscd1 mutant. Furthermore, we found that treatment of Arabidopsis wild-type seedlings with succinylacetone, an abnormal metabolite caused by loss of FAH in the Tyr degradation pathway (Lindblad et al., 1977), is able to mimic the sscd1 cell death phenotype. These results demonstrate that disruption of FAH leads to cell death in Arabidopsis and suggest that the Tyr degradation pathway is essential for plant survival under SD.     

The Role of a Potassium Transporter OsHAK5 in Potassium Acquisition and Transport from Roots to Shoots in Rice at Low Potassium Supply Levels

In plants, K transporter (KT)/high affinity K transporter (HAK)/K uptake permease (KUP) is the largest potassium (K) transporter family; however, few of the members have had their physiological functions characterized in planta. Here, we studied OsHAK5 of the KT/HAK/KUP family in rice (Oryza sativa). We determined its cellular and tissue localization and analyzed its functions in rice using both OsHAK5 knockout mutants and overexpression lines in three genetic backgrounds. A β-glucuronidase reporter driven by the OsHAK5 native promoter indicated OsHAK5 expression in various tissue organs from root to seed, abundantly in root epidermis and stele, the vascular tissues, and mesophyll cells. Net K influx rate in roots and K transport from roots to aerial parts were severely impaired by OsHAK5 knockout but increased by OsHAK5 overexpression in 0.1 and 0.3 mm K external solution. The contribution of OsHAK5 to K mobilization within the rice plant was confirmed further by the change of K concentration in the xylem sap and K distribution in the transgenic lines when K was removed completely from the external solution. Overexpression of OsHAK5 increased the K-sodium concentration ratio in the shoots and salt stress tolerance (shoot growth), while knockout of OsHAK5 decreased the K-sodium concentration ratio in the shoots, resulting in sensitivity to salt stress. Taken together, these results demonstrate that OsHAK5 plays a major role in K acquisition by roots faced with low external K and in K upward transport from roots to shoots in K-deficient rice plants.Potassium (K) is one of the three most important macronutrients and the most abundant cation in plants. As a major osmoticum in the vacuole, K drives the generation of turgor pressure, enabling cell expansion. In the vascular tissue, K is an important participant in the generation of root pressure (for review, see Wegner, 2014 [including his new hypothesis]). In the phloem, K is critical for the transport of photoassimilates from source to sink (Marschner, 1996; Deeken et al., 2002; Gajdanowicz et al., 2011). In addition, enhancing K absorption and decreasing sodium (Na) accumulation is a major strategy of glycophytes in salt stress tolerance (Maathuis and Amtmann, 1999; Munns and Tester, 2008; Shabala and Cuin, 2008).Plants acquire K through K-permeable proteins at the root surface. Since available K concentration in the soil may vary by 100-fold, plants have developed multiple K uptake systems for adapting to this variability (Epstein et al., 1963; Grabov, 2007; Maathuis, 2009). In a classic K uptake experiment in barley (Hordeum vulgare), root K absorption has been described as a high-affinity and low-affinity biphasic transport process (Epstein et al., 1963). It is generally assumed that the low-affinity transport system (LATS) in the roots mediates K uptake in the millimolar range and that the activity of this system is insensitive to external K concentration (Maathuis and Sanders, 1997; Chérel et al., 2014). In contrast, the high-affinity transport system (HATS) was rapidly up-regulated when the supply of exogenous K was halted (Glass, 1976; Glass and Dunlop, 1978).The membrane transporters for K flux identified in plants are generally classified into three channels and three transporter families based on phylogenetic analysis (Mäser et al., 2001; Véry and Sentenac, 2003; Lebaudy et al., 2007; Alemán et al., 2011). For K uptake, it was predicted that, under most circumstances, K transporters function as HATS, while K-permeable channels mediate LATS (Maathuis and Sanders, 1997). However, a root-expressed K channel in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), Arabidopsis K Transporter1 (AKT1), mediates K absorption over a wide range of external K concentrations (Sentenac et al., 1992; Lagarde et al., 1996; Hirsch et al., 1998; Spalding et al., 1999), while evidence is accumulating that many K transporters, including members of the K transporter (KT)/high affinity K transporter (HAK)/K uptake permease (KUP) family, are low-affinity K transporters (Quintero and Blatt, 1997; Senn et al., 2001), implying that functions of plant K channels and transporters overlap at different K concentration ranges.Out of the three families of K transporters, cation proton antiporter (CPA), high affinity K/Na transporter (HKT), and KT/HAK/KUP, CPA was characterized as a K⁺(Na⁺)/H⁺ antiporter, HKT may cotransport Na and K or transport Na only (Rubio et al., 1995; Uozumi et al., 2000), while KT/HAK/KUP were predicted to be H⁺-coupled K⁺ symporters (Mäser et al., 2001; Lebaudy et al., 2007). KT/HAK/KUP were named by different researchers who first identified and cloned them (Quintero and Blatt, 1997; Santa-María et al., 1997). In plants, the KT/HAK/KUP family is the largest K transporter family, including 13 members in Arabidopsis and 27 members in the rice (Oryza sativa) genome (Rubio et al., 2000; Mäser et al., 2001; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Gupta et al., 2008). Sequence alignments show that genes of this family share relatively low homology to each other. The KT/HAK/KUP family was divided into four major clusters (Rubio et al., 2000; Gupta et al., 2008), and in cluster I and II, they were further separated into A and B groups. Genes of cluster I or II likely exist in all plants, cluster III is composed of genes from both Arabidopsis and rice, while cluster IV includes only four rice genes (Grabov, 2007; Gupta et al., 2008).The functions of KT/HAK/KUP were studied mostly in heterologous expression systems. Transporters of cluster I, such as AtHAK5, HvHAK1, OsHAK1, and OsHAK5, are localized in the plasma membrane (Kim et al., 1998; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Gierth et al., 2005) and exhibit high-affinity K uptake in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Santa-María et al., 1997; Fu and Luan, 1998; Rubio et al., 2000) and in Escherichia coli (Horie et al., 2011). Transporters of cluster II, like AtKUP4 (TINY ROOT HAIRS1, TRH1), HvHAK2, OsHAK2, OsHAK7, and OsHAK10, could not complement the K uptake-deficient yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) but were able to mediate K fluxes in a bacterial mutant; they might be tonoplast transporters (Senn et al., 2001; Bañuelos et al., 2002; Rodríguez-Navarro and Rubio, 2006). The function of transporters in clusters III and IV is even less known (Grabov, 2007).Existing data suggest that some KT/HAK/KUP transporters also may respond to salinity stress (Maathuis, 2009). The cluster I transporters of HvHAK1 mediate Na influx (Santa-María et al., 1997), while AtHAK5 expression is inhibited by Na (Rubio et al., 2000; Nieves-Cordones et al., 2010). Expression of OsHAK5 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) BY2 cells enhanced the salt tolerance of these cells by accumulating more K without affecting their Na content (Horie et al., 2011).There are only scarce reports on the physiological function of KT/HAK/KUP in planta. In Arabidopsis, mutation of AtKUP2 (SHORT HYPOCOTYL3) resulted in a short hypocotyl, small leaves, and a short flowering stem (Elumalai et al., 2002), while a loss-of-function mutation of AtKUP4 (TRH1) resulted in short root hairs and a loss of gravity response in the root (Rigas et al., 2001; Desbrosses et al., 2003; Ahn et al., 2004). AtHAK5 is the only system currently known to mediate K uptake at concentrations below 0.01 mm (Rubio et al., 2010) and provides a cesium uptake pathway (Qi et al., 2008). AtHAK5 and AtAKT1 are the two major physiologically relevant molecular entities mediating K uptake into roots in the range between 0.01 and 0.05 mm (Pyo et al., 2010; Rubio et al., 2010). AtAKT1 may contribute to K uptake within the K concentrations that belong to the high-affinity system described by Epstein et al. (1963).Among all 27 members of the KT/HAK/KUP family in rice, OsHAK1, OsHAK5, OsHAK19, and OsHAK20 were grouped in cluster IB (Gupta et al., 2008). These four rice HAK members share 50.9% to 53.4% amino acid identity with AtHAK5. OsHAK1 was expressed in the whole plant, with maximum expression in roots, and was up-regulated by K deficiency; it mediated high-affinity K uptake in yeast (Bañuelos et al., 2002). In this study, we examined the tissue-specific localization and the physiological functions of OsHAK5 in response to variation in K supply and to salt stress in rice. By comparing K uptake and translocation in OsHAK5 knockout (KO) mutants and in OsHAK5-overexpressing lines with those in their respective wild-type lines supplied with different K concentrations, we found that OsHAK5 not only mediates high-affinity K acquisition but also participates in root-to-shoot K transport as well as in K-regulated salt tolerance.     

The Rubisco Small Subunit Is Involved in Tobamovirus Movement and Tm-22-Mediated Extreme Resistance

The multifunctional movement protein (MP) of Tomato mosaic tobamovirus (ToMV) is involved in viral cell-to-cell movement, symptom development, and resistance gene recognition. However, it remains to be elucidated how ToMV MP plays such diverse roles in plants. Here, we show that ToMV MP interacts with the Rubisco small subunit (RbCS) of Nicotiana benthamiana in vitro and in vivo. In susceptible N. benthamiana plants, silencing of NbRbCS enabled ToMV to induce necrosis in inoculated leaves, thus enhancing virus local infectivity. However, the development of systemic viral symptoms was delayed. In transgenic N. benthamiana plants harboring Tobacco mosaic virus resistance-2² (Tm-2²), which mediates extreme resistance to ToMV, silencing of NbRbCS compromised Tm-2²-dependent resistance. ToMV was able to establish efficient local infection but was not able to move systemically. These findings suggest that NbRbCS plays a vital role in tobamovirus movement and plant antiviral defenses.Plant viruses use at least one movement protein (MP) to facilitate viral spread between plant cells via plasmodesmata (PD; Lucas and Gilbertson, 1994; Ghoshroy et al., 1997). Among viral MPs, the MP of tobamoviruses, such as Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and its close relative Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV), is the best characterized. TMV MP specifically accumulates in PD and modifies the plasmodesmatal size exclusion limit in mature source leaves or tissues (Wolf et al., 1989; Deom et al., 1990; Ding et al., 1992). TMV MP and viral genomic RNA form a mobile ribonucleoprotein complex that is essential for cell-to-cell movement of viral infection (Watanabe et al., 1984; Deom et al., 1987; Citovsky et al., 1990, 1992; Kiselyova et al., 2001; Kawakami et al., 2004; Waigmann et al., 2007). TMV MP also enhances intercellular RNA silencing (Vogler et al., 2008) and affects viral symptom development, host range, and host susceptibility to virus (Dardick et al., 2000; Bazzini et al., 2007). Furthermore, ToMV MP is identified as an avirulence factor that is recognized by tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) resistance proteins Tobacco mosaic virus resistance-2 (Tm-2) and Tm-2² (Meshi et al., 1989; Lanfermeijer et al., 2004). Indeed, tomato Tm-2² confers extreme resistance against TMV and ToMV in tomato plants and even in heterologous tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants (Lanfermeijer et al., 2003, 2004).To date, several host factors that interact with TMV MP have been identified. These TMV MP-binding host factors include cell wall-associated proteins such as pectin methylesterase (Chen et al., 2000), calreticulin (Meshi et al., 1989), ANK1 (Ueki et al., 2010), and the cellular DnaJ-like protein MPIP1 (Shimizu et al., 2009). Many cytoskeletal components such as actin filaments (McLean et al., 1995), microtubules (Heinlein et al., 1995), and the microtubule-associated proteins MPB2C (Kragler et al., 2003) and EB1a (Brandner et al., 2008) also interact with TMV MP. Most of these factors are involved in TMV cell-to-cell movement.Rubisco catalyzes the first step of CO₂ assimilation in photosynthesis and photorespiration. The Rubisco holoenzyme is a heteropolymer consisting of eight large subunits (RbCLs) and eight small subunits (RbCSs). RbCL was reported to interact with the coat protein of Potato virus Y (Feki et al., 2005). Both RbCS and RbCL were reported to interact with the P3 proteins encoded by several potyviruses, including Shallot yellow stripe virus, Onion yellow dwarf virus, Soybean mosaic virus, and Turnip mosaic virus (Lin et al., 2011). Proteomic analysis of the plant-virus interactome revealed that RbCS participates in the formation of virus complexes of Rice yellow mottle virus (Brizard et al., 2006). However, the biological function of Rubisco in viral infection remains unknown.In this study, we show that RbCS plays an essential role in virus movement, host susceptibility, and Tm-2²-mediated extreme resistance in the ToMV-host plant interaction.