Enhanced Sucrose Loading Improves Rice Yield by Increasing Grain Size

Yield in cereals is a function of grain number and size. Sucrose (Suc), the main carbohydrate product of photosynthesis in higher plants, is transported long distances from source leaves to sink organs such as seeds and roots. Here, we report that transgenic rice plants (Oryza sativa) expressing the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) phloem-specific Suc transporter (AtSUC2), which loads Suc into the phloem under control of the phloem protein2 promoter (pPP2), showed an increase in grain yield of up to 16% relative to wild-type plants in field trials. Compared with wild-type plants, pPP2::AtSUC2 plants had larger spikelet hulls and larger and heavier grains. Grain filling was accelerated in the transgenic plants, and more photoassimilate was transported from the leaves to the grain. In addition, microarray analyses revealed that carbohydrate, amino acid, and lipid metabolism was enhanced in the leaves and grain of pPP2::AtSUC2 plants. Thus, enhancing Suc loading represents a promising strategy to improve rice yield to feed the global population.Rice (Oryza sativa) is a staple food for nearly one-half of the global population. Given the rapid growth of the world’s population, there is an urgent need to increase rice yield. Rice yield is a complex trait that is directly associated with grain size, panicle number, and the number of grains per panicle (Xing and Zhang, 2010). Increasing grain size is a prime breeding target, and several genes known to control rice grain size, such as GRAIN SIZE3 (GS3), GS5, GW2 QTL for rice grain width and weight (GW2), GW8, and rice seed width5, have been identified (Fan et al., 2006; Song et al., 2007; Shomura et al., 2008; Li et al., 2011a; Wang et al., 2012). However, our knowledge of the mechanisms that control rice yield is limited. Thus, further improving rice yield remains a challenge for breeders (Sakamoto and Matsuoka, 2008). Identifying and characterizing unique genes or targets that regulate yield traits would improve our understanding of the molecular mechanisms that regulate yield traits and facilitate the breeding of new rice varieties with higher yields.The carbohydrates in rice grains originate from photosynthesis that is carried out predominantly in leaves (sources). Therefore, grain filling and rice yield depend on the efficient transport of carbohydrates from the leaves to seeds (sinks). In most plants, Suc is the main carbohydrate transported long distance in the veins to support the growth and development of roots, flowers, fruits, and seeds (Baker et al., 2012; Braun, 2012). Recently, the entire pathway for the export of Suc from leaves has been elucidated (Baker et al., 2012; Braun, 2012). Suc is synthesized in leaf mesophyll cells and diffuses from cell to cell through plasmodesmata until it reaches the phloem parenchyma cells (Slewinski and Braun, 2010). The SWEET transporters mediate Suc efflux from the phloem parenchyma cells into the apoplast, where Suc is subsequently loaded into the phloem sieve element-companion cell (SE/CC) complexes by Suc transporters (SUTs; Braun and Slewinski, 2009; Ayre, 2011; Chen et al., 2012). The resultant accumulation of Suc in sieve elements produces a hydrostatic pressure gradient that results in the bulk flow of Suc through a conduit of contiguous sieve elements, leading to its arrival and unloading in sink tissues (Lalonde et al., 2004; Baker et al., 2012).Genetic evidence has demonstrated that apoplastic Suc phloem loading is critical for growth, development, and reproduction in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). AtSWEET11 and AtSWEET12 are localized to the plasma membrane of the phloem and are expressed in a subset of phloem parenchyma cells in minor veins. These transporters mediate Suc efflux from phloem parenchyma cells into the apoplast prior to Suc uptake by SE/CC (Chen et al., 2012). The atsweet11 or atsweet12 single mutants exhibit no aberrant phenotypes, possibly due to genetic redundancy. However, atsweet11;12 double mutants are mildly chlorotic and display slower growth and higher levels of starch and sugar accumulation in the leaves than do wild-type plants (Chen et al., 2012). Arabidopsis phloem-specific sucrose transporter (AtSUC2) is a phloem-specific SUT that is expressed specifically in companion cells (Stadler and Sauer, 1996). AtSUC2 plays an essential role in phloem Suc loading and is necessary for efficient Suc transport from source to sink tissues in Arabidopsis (Stadler and Sauer, 1996; Gottwald et al., 2000; Srivastava et al., 2008). The atsuc2 mutants show stunted growth, retarded development, and sterility. Furthermore, these mutants accumulate excess starch in the leaves and fail to transport sugar efficiently to the roots and inflorescences (Gottwald et al., 2000).The proper control of carbohydrate partitioning is fundamental to crop yield (Braun, 2012). It has been reported that increasing sink grain strength by improving assimilate uptake capacity could be a promising approach toward obtaining higher yield. For example, seed-specific overexpression of a potato (Solanum tuberosum) SUT increased Suc uptake and growth rates of developing pea (Pisum sativum) cotyledons (Rosche et al., 2002). In addition, the Suc uptake capacity of grains and storage protein biosynthesis was increased in transgenic wheat (Triticum aestivum) plants expressing the barley (Hordeum vulgare) SUT HvSUT1 under the control of an endosperm-specific promoter (Weichert et al., 2010). Moreover, it was recently found that these transgenic wheat plants had a higher thousand grain weight and grain width and length, as well as a 28% increase in grain yield (Saalbach et al., 2014).Since the carbohydrates in rice grains originate from photosynthesis in source leaves, and carbohydrate partitioning from source leaves to heterotrophic sinks (e.g. seeds) is mediated by Suc transport in plants (Lalonde et al., 2004; Ayre, 2011), enhancing the capacity for Suc transport from leaves to seeds theoretically could increase crop yield. However, until now, enhancing Suc transport from leaves to seeds has not been shown to improve yield (Ainsworth and Bush, 2011).Here, we tested the hypothesis that enhancing Suc transport from leaves to seeds would increase rice yield. We expressed Arabidopsis SUC2 under control of the phloem protein2 promoter (pPP2) in rice and found that enhancing Suc loading did indeed increase rice yield. The pPP2::AtSUC2 plants produced larger grain than the wild type and showed grain yield increases of up to 16% in field trials. Our results suggest that manipulating phloem Suc transport is a useful strategy for increasing grain yield in rice and other cereal crops.     

Multispectral Phloem-Mobile Probes: Properties and Applications

Using Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) seedlings, we identified a range of small fluorescent probes that entered the translocation stream and were unloaded at the root tip. These probes had absorbance/emission maxima ranging from 367/454 to 546/576 nm and represent a versatile toolbox for studying phloem transport. Of the probes that we tested, naturally occurring fluorescent coumarin glucosides (esculin and fraxin) were phloem loaded and transported in oocytes by the sucrose transporter, AtSUC2. Arabidopsis plants in which AtSUC2 was replaced with barley (Hordeum vulgare) sucrose transporter (HvSUT1), which does not transport esculin in oocytes, failed to load esculin into the phloem. In wild-type plants, the fluorescence of esculin decayed to background levels about 2 h after phloem unloading, making it a suitable tracer for pulse-labeling studies of phloem transport. We identified additional probes, such as carboxytetraethylrhodamine, a red fluorescent probe that, unlike esculin, was stable for several hours after phloem unloading and could be used to study phloem transport in Arabidopsis lines expressing green fluorescent protein.The phloem of higher plants consists of a series of longitudinally arranged sieve elements (SEs), companion cells (CCs), and associated parenchyma elements (Heo et al., 2014). The SEs translocate a diverse range of solutes, proteins, and RNAs from source to sink organs and perform key roles in solute delivery and signaling (Turgeon and Wolf, 2009; Ham and Lucas, 2014). The phloem is a delicate tissue, and examining its structure and function has proven to be a difficult task (Knoblauch and Oparka, 2012; Truernit, 2014). Arguably, the most reliable way to assess the rate of phloem transport in different organs is by using radiolabeled solutes derived photosynthetically from ¹⁴CO₂ (Kölling et al., 2013). In parallel, autoradiography provides a valuable means of imaging the distribution of radiolabeled solutes in different tissues (Housley and Fisher, 1975; Kölling et al., 2013). However, both of these methods are time consuming and limited by resolution. In the last decade, the use of fluorescent tracers has become prominent, allowing phloem transport to be imaged in living SEs with significantly improved resolution above autoradiography (Knoblauch and Oparka, 2012). Importantly, these probes cannot be used as substrates for Suc loading, which in many species, occurs by active, carrier-mediated transport (Turgeon and Wolf, 2009).Schumacher (1933) was the first plant biologist, to our knowledge, to study phloem transport using the fluorescent molecule fluorescein. Since then, however, only a few additional phloem-mobile probes have been discovered. Two such probes are carboxyfluorescein (CF; Grignon et al., 1989; Oparka et al., 1994) and 8-hydroxypyrene-1,3,6-trisulphonic acid (HPTS; Wright and Oparka, 1996). When applied in the ester (acetate) form, these probes are phloem mobile, although the exact mechanism by which they enter the phloem is unknown. In the case of CF, it is possible that this probe diffuses into the phloem and is retained in SEs by ion trapping (Wright and Oparka, 1996), a characteristic that it may share with many phloem-mobile herbicides (Hsu and Kleier, 1996). In contrast, HPTS is a highly charged molecule that should not cross membranes (Wright and Oparka, 1996), but it enters the phloem readily. Despite a lack of understanding of how these probes are loaded into the phloem, they have been used extensively in monitoring phloem transport (Knoblauch and van Bel, 1998). They have also found use in imaging symplastic pathways after unloading (Oparka et al., 1994; Roberts et al., 1997; Savage et al., 2013) and identifying symplastic domains in developing tissues (Gisel et al., 1999; Stadler et al., 2005). However, both CF and HPTS emit in the green spectrum, restricting their use for imaging movement in cells that express GFP as a reporter.The limited number of existing probes for phloem transport prompted us to explore unique small molecules differing in excitation and emission spectra as potential tracers. Using an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) seedling screen, we tested the phloem mobility of several small-molecule probes. In addition, we explored the use of esculin as a phloem-mobile tracer. Esculin is a fluorescent coumarin glucoside that is transported in oocytes by AtSUC2 (Sivitz et al., 2007), the major Suc transporter that loads the phloem in Arabidopsis (Gottwald et al., 2000). Here, we describe the development and application of a range of probes for monitoring phloem transport. These small probes cover absorbance/emission maxima ranging from 367/454 to 546/576 nm, allowing them to be used on plant material expressing different fluorescent reporter proteins. We describe the properties of these probes and show how they can be used in both pulse- and dual-labeling studies of phloem transport.     

SWEET17, a Facilitative Transporter,Mediates Fructose Transport across the Tonoplast of Arabidopsis Roots and Leaves

Fructose (Fru) is a major storage form of sugars found in vacuoles, yet the molecular regulation of vacuolar Fru transport is poorly studied. Although SWEET17 (for SUGARS WILL EVENTUALLY BE EXPORTED TRANSPORTERS17) has been characterized as a vacuolar Fru exporter in leaves, its expression in leaves is low. Here, RNA analysis and SWEET17-β-glucuronidase/-GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN fusions expressed in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) reveal that SWEET17 is highly expressed in the cortex of roots and localizes to the tonoplast of root cells. Expression of SWEET17 in roots was inducible by Fru and darkness, treatments that activate accumulation and release of vacuolar Fru, respectively. Mutation and ectopic expression of SWEET17 led to increased and decreased root growth in the presence of Fru, respectively. Overexpression of SWEET17 specifically reduced the Fru content in leaves by 80% during cold stress. These results intimate that SWEET17 functions as a Fru-specific uniporter on the root tonoplast. Vacuoles overexpressing SWEET17 showed increased [¹⁴C]Fru uptake compared with the wild type. SWEET17-mediated Fru uptake was insensitive to ATP or treatment with NH₄Cl or carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl hydrazone, indicating that SWEET17 functions as an energy-independent facilitative carrier. The Arabidopsis genome contains a close paralog of SWEET17 in clade IV, SWEET16. The predominant expression of SWEET16 in root vacuoles and reduced root growth of mutants under Fru excess indicate that SWEET16 also functions as a vacuolar transporter in roots. We propose that in addition to a role in leaves, SWEET17 plays a key role in facilitating bidirectional Fru transport across the tonoplast of roots in response to metabolic demand to maintain cytosolic Fru homeostasis.Sugars are main energy sources for generating ATP, major precursors to various storage carbohydrates as well as key signaling molecules important for normal growth in higher plants (Rolland et al., 2006). Depending on the metabolic demand, sugars are translocated over long distances or stored locally. SWEET (for SUGARS WILL EVENTUALLY BE EXPORTED TRANSPORTERS) and SUC/SUT (for Sucrose transporter/Sugar transporter)-type transporters are responsible for transfer of Suc from the phloem parenchyma into the sieve element companion cell complex for long-distance translocation (Riesmeier et al., 1992; Sauer, 2007; Kühn and Grof, 2010; Chen et al., 2012). Suc or hexoses derived from Suc hydrolysis in the cell wall are then taken up into sink cells by SUT (Braun and Slewinski, 2009) or monosaccharide transporters, such as sugar transporter1 (Sauer et al., 1990; Pego and Smeekens, 2000; Sherson et al., 2003). Alternatively, sugars are thought to move between cells via plasmodesmata (Voitsekhovskaja et al., 2006; Ayre, 2011). Major sugar storage pools within plant cells are soluble sugars stored in the vacuole, starch in plastids, and lipids in oil bodies.Vacuoles, which can account for approximately 90% of the cell volume (Winter et al., 1993), play central roles in temporary and long-term storage of soluble sugars (Martinoia et al., 2007; Etxeberria et al., 2012). Some agriculturally important crops such as sugar beet (Beta vulgaris; Leigh, 1984; Getz and Klein, 1995), citrus (Citrus spp.; Echeverria and Valich, 1988), sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum; Thom et al., 1982), and carrot (Daucus carota; Keller, 1988) can store considerable amounts (>10% of plant dry weight) of Suc, Glc, or Fru in vacuoles of the storage parenchyma. Due to a high capacity of vacuoles for storing sugars, vacuolar sugars can serve as an important carbohydrate source during energy starvation, e.g. after starch has been exhausted (Echeverria and Valich, 1988), as well as for the production of other compounds (e.g. osmoprotectants). Sugars are known to regulate photosynthesis; therefore, the release of sugars from vacuoles could be important for modulating photosynthesis (Kaiser and Heber, 1984). Moreover, vacuole-derived sugars are commercially used to produce biofuels, such as ethanol, from sugarcane. Knowledge of the key transporters involved in sugar exchange between the vacuole and cytoplasm is thus relevant in the context of bioenergy (Grennan and Gragg, 2009).To facilitate the exchange of sugars across the tonoplast, plant vacuoles are equipped with a multitude of transporters (Neuhaus, 2007; Etxeberria et al., 2012; Martinoia et al., 2012) comprising both facilitated diffusion and active transport systems of vacuolar sugars (Martinoia et al., 2000). Typically, Suc is actively imported into vacuoles by tonoplast monosaccharide transporter (AtTMT1/AtTMT2; Schulz et al., 2011) and exported by the SUT4 family (AtSUC4, OsSUT2; Eom et al., 2011; Payyavula et al., 2011; Schulz et al., 2011). Two H⁺-dependent sugar antiporters, the vacuolar Glc transporter (AtVGT1; Aluri and Büttner, 2007) and AtTMT1 (Wormit et al., 2006), mediate Glc uptake across the tonoplast to promote carbohydrate accumulation in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). The Early Responsive to Dehydration-Like6 protein has been shown to export vacuolar Glc into the cytosol (Poschet et al., 2011), likely via an energy-independent diffusion mechanism (Yamada et al., 2010). Defects in these vacuolar sugar transporters alter carbohydrate partitioning and allocation and inhibit plant growth and seed yield (Aluri and Büttner, 2007; Wingenter et al., 2010; Eom et al., 2011; Poschet et al., 2011).In contrast to numerous studies on vacuolar transport of Suc and Glc, limited efforts have been devoted to the molecular mechanism of vacuolar Fru transport even though Fru is predominantly located in vacuoles (Martinoia et al., 1987; Voitsekhovskaja et al., 2006; Tohge et al., 2011). Vacuolar Fru is important for the regulation of turgor pressure (Pontis, 1989), antioxidative defense (Bogdanović et al., 2008), and signal transduction during early seedling development (Cho and Yoo, 2011; Li et al., 2011). Thus, control of Fru transport across the tonoplast is thought to be important for plant growth and development. One vacuolar Glc transporter from the Arabidopsis monosaccharide transporter family, VGT1, has been reported to mediate low-affinity Fru uptake when expressed in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) vacuoles (Aluri and Büttner, 2007). Yet, the high vacuolar uptake activity to Fru intimates the existence of additional high-capacity Fru-specific vacuolar transporters (Thom et al., 1982). Recently, quantitative mapping of a quantitative trait locus for Fru content of leaves led to the identification of the Fru-specific vacuolar transporter SWEET17 (Chardon et al., 2013).SWEET17 belongs to the recently identified SWEET (PFAM:PF03083) super family, which contains 17 members in Arabidopsis and 21 in rice (Oryza sativa; Chen et al., 2010; Frommer et al., 2013; Xuan et al., 2013). Based on homology with 27% to 80% amino acid identity, plant SWEET proteins were grouped into four subclades (Chen et al., 2010). Analysis of GFP fusions indicated that most SWEET transporters are plasma membrane localized. Transport assays using radiotracers in Xenopus laevis oocytes and sugar nanosensors in mammalian cells showed that they function as largely pH-independent low-affinity uniporters with both uptake and efflux activity (Chen et al., 2010, 2012). In particular, clade I and II SWEETs transport monosaccharides and clade III SWEETs transport disaccharides, mainly Suc (Chen et al., 2010, 2012). Mutant phenotypes and developmental expression of several SWEET transporters support important roles in sugar translocation between organs. The clade III SWEETs, in particular SWEET11 and 12, mediate the key step of Suc efflux from phloem parenchyma cells for phloem translocation (Chen et al., 2012). Moreover, SWEETs are coopted by pathogens, likely to provide energy resources and carbon at the site of infection (Chen et al., 2010). Mutations of SWEET8/Ruptured pollen grain1 in Arabidopsis, and RNA inhibition of OsSWEET11 (also called Os8N3 or Xa13) in rice, and petunia (Petunia hybrida) NEC1 resulted in male sterility (Ge et al., 2001; Yang et al., 2006; Guan et al., 2008), possibly caused by inhibiting the Glc supply to developing pollen (Guan et al., 2008). Interestingly, two members, SWEET16 and SWEET17, of the family localize to the tonoplast (Chardon et al., 2013; Klemens et al., 2013). Allelic variation or mutations that affect SWEET17 expression caused Fru accumulation in Arabidopsis leaves, indicating that it plays a key role in exporting Fru from leaf vacuoles (Chardon et al., 2013). A more recent study demonstrated that SWEET16 also functions as a vacuolar sugar transporter (Klemens et al., 2013). Surprisingly, however, SWEET17 expression in mature leaves was comparatively low (Chardon et al., 2013), which leads us to ask whether SWEET17 could mainly function in other tissues under specific developmental or environmental conditions. Although Arabidopsis SWEET17 has been shown to transport Fru in a heterologous system where it accumulated in part at the plasma membrane (Chardon et al., 2013), the biochemical properties of SWEET17 were still elusive. SWEET16 and SWEET17 from Arabidopsis belong to the clade IV SWEETs. Whether clade IV proteins both transport vacuolar sugars in planta deserves further studies.Here, we used GUS/GFP fusions to reveal the root-dominant expression and vacuolar localization of the SWEET17 protein in vivo and its regulation by Fru levels. Phenotypes of mutants and overexpressors were consistent with a role of SWEET17 in bidirectional Fru transport across root vacuoles. The uniport feature of SWEET17 transport was further confirmed using isolated mesophyll vacuoles. Similarly, SWEET16 is also shown to function in vacuolar sugar transport in roots. Our work, performed in parallel to the two other studies (Chardon et al., 2013; Klemens et al., 2013), provides direct evidence for Fru uniport by SWEET17 and presents functional analyses to uncover important roles of these vacuolar transporters in maintaining intracellular Fru homeostasis in roots.     

Overexpression of the Vacuolar Sugar Carrier AtSWEET16 Modifies Germination,Growth, and Stress Tolerance in Arabidopsis

Here, we report that SUGARS WILL EVENTUALLY BE EXPORTED TRANSPORTER (SWEET16) from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) is a vacuole-located carrier, transporting glucose (Glc), fructose (Fru), and sucrose (Suc) after heterologous expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes. The SWEET16 gene, similar to the homologs gene SWEET17, is mainly expressed in vascular parenchyma cells. Application of Glc, Fru, or Suc, as well as cold, osmotic stress, or low nitrogen, provoke the down-regulation of SWEET16 messenger RNA accumulation. SWEET16 overexpressors (35S_Pro:SWEET16) showed a number of peculiarities related to differences in sugar accumulation, such as less Glc, Fru, and Suc at the end of the night. Under cold stress, 35S_Pro:SWEET16 plants are unable to accumulate Fru, while under nitrogen starvation, both Glc and Fru, but not Suc, were less abundant. These changes of individual sugars indicate that the consequences of an increased SWEET16 activity are dependent upon the type of external stimulus. Remarkably, 35S_Pro:SWEET16 lines showed improved germination and increased freezing tolerance. The latter observation, in combination with the modified sugar levels, points to a superior function of Glc and Suc for frost tolerance. 35S_Pro:SWEET16 plants exhibited increased growth efficiency when cultivated on soil and showed improved nitrogen use efficiency when nitrate was sufficiently available, while under conditions of limiting nitrogen, wild-type biomasses were higher than those of 35S_Pro:SWEET16 plants. Our results identify SWEET16 as a vacuolar sugar facilitator, demonstrate the substantial impact of SWEET16 overexpression on various critical plant traits, and imply that SWEET16 activity must be tightly regulated to allow optimal Arabidopsis development under nonfavorable conditions.Sugars are of enormous importance for plant properties and the agronomic values of most crop species (John, 1992). In plants, they serve as energy reserves, as building blocks for carbohydrate polymers like starch or cellulose, as precursors for amino and carboxylic acids, and as osmolytes required for the molecular antifreezing program initiated after exposure to cold temperatures (Nägele et al., 2010).Sugars in leaves are synthesized either during the day via photosynthesis or in the night as a product of starch degradation. The major sugar synthesized in most plants during the day is Suc, which, after the export of triose phosphates from the chloroplast, is synthesized in the cytosol. During nocturnal starch degradation, maltose leaves the chloroplast and serves as a substrate for the cytosolic synthesis of heteroglycans (Fettke et al., 2005). Subsequent to this, heteroglycans are degraded by phosphorylases (Fettke et al., 2005) and act as a carbon source to synthesize Suc, which can be hydrolyzed by cytosolic or vacuolar invertases to monosaccharides (Roitsch and González, 2004). These processes, in sum, enable leaf mesophyll cells to synthesize Glc and Fru, in addition to Suc, during the day and at night.Besides these metabolic processes, sugars are transported between different intracellular compartments and between different cells in order to serve as a long-distance carbon supply for sink organs. Due to their large size and hydrate shell, the movement of neutral sugars like Suc, Glc, or Fru across membranes requires the presence of membrane-bound carriers. For example, in the plant plasma membrane, a wide number of monosaccharide- and Suc-specific carriers were identified and have been analyzed with biochemical and molecular approaches. The Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genome harbors more than 50 isoforms of putative monosaccharide carriers, most of which belong to the sugar transport protein subfamily (Büttner and Sauer, 2000), while about 20 putative disaccharide carriers sucrose transporters (named SUT and SUC) are present in this plant species (Lalonde et al., 2004). Most of the sugar transport protein, SUT, or SUC carriers analyzed so far reside in the plasma membrane and import, as proton-coupled transporters, apoplastic sugars against a concentration gradient (Lalonde et al., 2004). This proton-driven sugar import allows a substantial accumulation of Suc in phloem sieve elements, building the driving force for interorgan long-distance sugar transport (Turgeon and Wolf, 2009). All monosaccharide and disaccharide carriers mentioned above exhibit 12 predicted transmembrane domains and group into the large major facilitator superfamily of carriers (Marger and Saier, 1993).In both photosynthetic active mesophyll cells as well as storage tissues, the large central vacuole represents the internal storage compartment for sugars (Martinoia et al., 2007, 2012), leading, in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) or sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum), up to even 20% sugars per fresh biomass (John, 1992). Suc import into the vacuole occurs either via facilitated diffusion (Kaiser and Heber, 1984) or electrogenically via antiport against protons (Willenbrink and Doll, 1979). The latter process is driven by the significant proton-motive force across the vacuolar membrane (Schumacher and Krebs, 2010) and allows a substantial Suc accumulation in storage organs of high-sugar species (Getz, 1987; Getz and Klein, 1995). However, no Suc importer at the vacuolar membrane (tonoplast) has been identified on the molecular level yet, while tonoplast-located Suc exporters have been identified. This vacuolar Suc export is mediated by members of the SUT4-type clade of carriers, in cereals named SUT2 (Endler et al., 2006; Eom et al., 2011), procuring a proton-driven Suc export into the cytosol (Schulz et al., 2011). Loss of function of this type of carrier in Arabidopsis, poplar (Populus spp.), or rice (Oryza sativa) leads to an accumulation of Suc in leaves (Eom et al., 2011; Payyavula et al., 2011; Schneider et al., 2012), elegantly proving that this type of carrier fulfills an export function under in vivo conditions.In contrast to vacuolar Suc import, the import of monosaccharides into this compartment has been deciphered on the molecular level. In the Arabidopsis tonoplast, two different monosaccharide importers have been identified, namely the vacuolar Glc transporter protein and three isoforms of the tonoplast monosaccharide transporter (TMT; Wormit et al., 2006; Aluri and Büttner, 2007). While vacuolar Glc transporter loss-of-function plants do not show significant changes in monosaccharide levels (Aluri and Büttner, 2007), decreased TMT activity correlates with impaired vacuolar sugar import and low levels of both Glc and Fru in leaves (Wormit et al., 2006). This fact and the observations that (1) TMT1 is a sugar/proton antiporter (Schulz et al., 2011), (2) increased TMT activity provokes improved seed biomass (Wingenter et al., 2010), and (3) TMT activity is highly regulated via protein phosphorylation (Wingenter et al., 2011) clearly underline the superior function of TMT for monosaccharide loading into the plant vacuole.So far, two carriers, ESL1 and ERDL6, have been found to be responsible for Glc export from the plant vacuole (Yamada et al., 2010; Poschet et al., 2011). ESL1 (for early responsive to dehydration6-like1) represents a carrier majorly expressed in pericycle and xylem parenchyma cells and is known to be induced by drought stress (Yamada et al., 2010). Loss-of-function mutants of the ERDL6 (for early responsive to dehydration6-like6) carrier show increased leaf Glc levels and decreased seed weight, indicating that controlled Glc export via this carrier is critical for interorgan movement of sugars in Arabidopsis (Poschet et al., 2011). ESL1 seems to transport Glc in a facilitated diffusion, while in contrast to the plasma membrane-located sugar carriers and to TMT, the transport mode of ERDL6 has not been identified so far.In marked contrast to the carriers mentioned above, the recent identification of the so-called SWEET proteins opened our understanding of how cellular sugar export is achieved. SWEET proteins occur in plants as well as in animals and humans and consist of only seven predicted transmembrane domains (Chen et al., 2010). The observation that the expression of several plant SWEET proteins is strongly induced by various pathogens indicated that they serve as sugar exporters. That hypothesis has been proven for some SWEET isoforms by heterologous expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes (Chen et al., 2010), and detailed analysis revealed that Arabidopsis SWEET11 and SWEET12 catalyze Suc export from source leaves and are critical for interorgan sugar transport (Chen et al., 2012).In a recent quantitative trait locus analysis, we identified SWEET17 as a novel determinant of leaf Fru content, especially under cold conditions and conditions of low nitrogen supply (Chardon et al., 2013). In fact, a detailed molecular-physiological analysis revealed that SWEET17 is the first vacuole-located SWEET protein and that it serves as a Fru-specific exporter, connecting the vacuolar lumen to the cytosol. In contrast to SWEET17, the subcellular localization of its closest homolog, SWEET16, is elusive. Moreover, transport properties of SWEET16 are unknown, and the effect of increased SWEET16 activity (or any other SWEET proteins) on plant properties has not been determined. The latter aspect is of particular interest, since most genes coding for SWEET proteins are only comparably weakly expressed or are only expressed in certain cell types (Chen et al., 2010; Chardon et al., 2013).In this report, we analyzed the intracellular localization of SWEET16 and studied its transport properties in X. laevis oocytes. Moreover, we constructed constitutive SWEET16-overexpressing Arabidopsis lines and report the impact of this overexpression of a vacuolar SWEET protein on plant development and stress tolerance. Our results support the hypothesis that the activity of a SWEET facilitator has to be controlled in planta to cope with altering environmental and developmental conditions.     

Grain setting defect1, Encoding a Remorin Protein,Affects the Grain Setting in Rice through Regulating Plasmodesmatal Conductance

Effective grain filling is one of the key determinants of grain setting in rice (Oryza sativa). Grain setting defect1 (GSD1), which encodes a putative remorin protein, was found to affect grain setting in rice. Investigation of the phenotype of a transfer DNA insertion mutant (gsd1-Dominant) with enhanced GSD1 expression revealed abnormalities including a reduced grain setting rate, accumulation of carbohydrates in leaves, and lower soluble sugar content in the phloem exudates. GSD1 was found to be specifically expressed in the plasma membrane and plasmodesmata (PD) of phloem companion cells. Experimental evidence suggests that the phenotype of the gsd1-Dominant mutant is caused by defects in the grain-filling process as a result of the impaired transport of carbohydrates from the photosynthetic site to the phloem. GSD1 functioned in affecting PD conductance by interacting with rice ACTIN1 in association with the PD callose binding protein1. Together, our results suggest that GSD1 may play a role in regulating photoassimilate translocation through the symplastic pathway to impact grain setting in rice.Grain filling, a key determinant of grain yield in rice (Oryza sativa), hinges on the successful translocation of photoassimilates from the leaves to the fertilized reproductive organs through the phloem transport system. Symplastic phloem loading, which is one of the main pathways responsible for the transport of photoassimilates in rice, is mediated by plasmodesmata (PD) that connect phloem companion cells with sieve elements and surrounding parenchyma cells (Kaneko et al., 1980; Chonan et al., 1981; Eom et al., 2012). PD are transverse cell wall channels structured with the cytoplasmic sleeve and the modified endoplasmic reticulum desmotubule between neighboring cells (Maule, 2008). A number of proteins affect the structure and functional performance of the PD, which in turn impacts the cell-to-cell transport of small and large molecules through the PD during plant growth, development, and defense (Cilia and Jackson, 2004; Sagi et al., 2005; Lucas et al., 2009; Simpson et al., 2009; Stonebloom et al., 2009). For example, actin and myosin, which link the desmotubule to the plasma membrane (PM) at the neck region of PD, are believed to play a role in regulating PD permeability by controlling PD aperture (White et al., 1994; Ding et al., 1996; Reichelt et al., 1999). Callose deposition can also impact the size of the PD aperture at the neck region (Radford et al., 1998; Levy et al., 2007) and callose synthase genes such as Glucan Synthase-Like7 (GSL7, also named CalS7), GSL8, and GSL12 have been shown to play a role in regulating symplastic trafficking (Guseman et al., 2010; Barratt et al., 2011; Vatén et al., 2011; Xie et al., 2011). Other proteins that have been shown to impact the structure and function of the PD include glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins, PD callose binding protein1 (PDCB1), which is also associated with callose deposition (Simpson et al., 2009), and LYSIN MOTIF DOMAIN-CONTAINING GLYCOSYLPHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL-ANCHORED PROTEIN2, which limits the molecular flux through the PD by chitin perception (Faulkner et al., 2013). Changes in PD permeability can have major consequences for the translocation of photoassimilates needed for grain filling in rice. However, the genes and molecular mechanisms underlying the symplastic transport of photoassimilates remain poorly characterized.Remorins are a diverse family of plant-specific proteins with conserved C-terminal sequences and highly variable N-terminal sequences. Remorins can be classified into six distinct phylogenetic groups (Raffaele et al., 2007). The functions of most remorins are unknown, but some members of the family have been shown to be involved in immune response through controlling the cell-to-cell spread of microbes. StREM1.3, a remorin that is located in PM rafts and the PD, was shown to impair the cell-to-cell movement of a plant virus X by binding to Triple Gene Block protein1 (Raffaele et al., 2009). Medicago truncatula symbiotic remorin1 (MtSYMREM1), a remorin located at the PM in Medicago truncatula, was shown to facilitate infection and the release of rhizobial bacteria into the host cytoplasm (Lefebvre et al., 2010). Overexpression of LjSYMREM1, the ortholog of MtSYMREM1 in Lotus japonicus, resulted in increased root nodulation (Lefebvre et al., 2010; Tóth et al., 2012). Although a potential association between remorins and PD permeability has been proposed (Raffaele et al., 2009), the diversity observed across remorins, plus the fact that remorin mutants generated through different approaches fail to show obvious phenotypes (Reymond et al., 1996; Bariola et al., 2004), have made it challenging to characterize the function of remorins in cell-to-cell transport.In this study, we identified a rice transfer DNA (T-DNA) insertion mutant (grain setting defect1-Dominant [gsd1-D]), with a grain setting-deficient phenotype caused by overexpression of GSD1, a remorin gene with unknown function. GSD1 is expressed specifically in phloem companion cells and is localized in the PD and PM. We provide evidence to show that overexpression of GSD1 leads to deficient grain setting in rice, likely as a consequence of reduced sugar transport resulting from decreased PD permeability in phloem companion cells.     

Arsenic Speciation in Phloem and Xylem Exudates of Castor Bean

How arsenic (As) is transported in phloem remains unknown. To help answer this question, we quantified the chemical species of As in phloem and xylem exudates of castor bean (Ricinus communis) exposed to arsenate [As(V)], arsenite [As(III)], monomethylarsonic acid [MMA(V)], or dimethylarsinic acid. In the As(V)- and As(III)-exposed plants, As(V) was the main species in xylem exudate (55%–83%) whereas As(III) predominated in phloem exudate (70%–94%). The ratio of As concentrations in phloem to xylem exudate varied from 0.7 to 3.9. Analyses of phloem exudate using high-resolution inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry and accurate mass electrospray mass spectrometry coupled to high-performance liquid chromatography identified high concentrations of reduced and oxidized glutathione and some oxidized phytochelatin, but no As(III)-thiol complexes. It is thought that As(III)-thiol complexes would not be stable in the alkaline conditions of phloem sap. Small concentrations of oxidized glutathione and oxidized phytochelatin were found in xylem exudate, where there was also no evidence of As(III)-thiol complexes. MMA(V) was partially reduced to MMA(III) in roots, but only MMA(V) was found in xylem and phloem exudate. Despite the smallest uptake among the four As species supplied to plants, dimethylarsinic acid was most efficiently transported in both xylem and phloem, and its phloem concentration was 3.2 times that in xylem. Our results show that free inorganic As, mainly As(III), was transported in the phloem of castor bean exposed to either As(V) or As(III), and that methylated As species were more mobile than inorganic As in the phloem.Arsenic (As) is an environmental and food chain contaminant that has attracted much attention in recent years. Soil contamination with As may lead to phytotoxicity and reduced crop yield (Panaullah et al., 2009). Food crops are also an important source of inorganic As, a class-one carcinogen, in human dietary intake, and there is a need to decrease the exposure to this toxin (European Food Safety Authority, 2009). Paddy rice (Oryza sativa) is particularly efficient in As accumulation, which poses a potential risk to the population based on a rice diet (Meharg et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2010a). Other terrestrial food crops generally do not accumulate as much As as paddy rice; however, where soils are contaminated, relatively high concentrations of As in wheat (Triticum aestivum) grain have been reported (Williams et al., 2007; Zhao et al., 2010b). On the other hand, some fern species in the Pteridaceae family are able to tolerate and hyperaccumulate As in the aboveground part to >1,000 mg kg⁻¹ dry weight (e.g. Ma et al., 2001; Zhao et al., 2002); these plants offer the possibility for remediation of As-contaminated soil or water (Salido et al., 2003; Huang et al., 2004). A better understanding of As uptake and long-distance transport, metabolism, and detoxification is needed for developing strategies for mitigating As contamination, through either decreased As accumulation in food crops or enhanced As accumulation for phytoremediation.The pathways of As uptake by plant roots differ between different As species; arsenate [As(V)] enters plant cells via phosphate transporters, whereas arsenite [As(III)] is taken up via some aquaporins (for review, see Zhao et al., 2009). In rice, a silicic acid efflux protein also mediates As(III) efflux toward stele for xylem loading (Ma et al., 2008). Methylated As species, such as monomethylarsonic acid [MMA(V)] and dimethylarsinic acid [DMA(V)], which may be present in the environment as products of microbial or algal methylation of inorganic As or from past uses of methylated As pesticides, are taken up by rice roots partly through the aquaporin NIP2;1 (for nodulin 26-like intrinsic protein; also named Lsi1; Li et al., 2009). Once inside plant cells, As(V) is reduced to As(III), possibly catalyzed by As(V) reductase(s) such as the plant homologs of the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) ACR2 (Bleeker et al., 2006; Dhankher et al., 2006; Ellis et al., 2006; Duan et al., 2007). As(III) has a high affinity to thiol (-SH) groups and is detoxified by complexation with thiol-rich phytochelatins (PCs; Pickering et al., 2000; Schmöger et al., 2000; Raab et al., 2005; Bluemlein et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2010). As(III)-PC complexation in roots was found to result in reduced mobility for efflux and for long-distance transport, possibly because the complexes are stored in the vacuoles (Liu et al., 2010). Excess As(III) causes cellular toxicity by binding to the vicinal thiol groups of enzymes, such as the plastidial lipoamide dehydrogenase, which has been shown to be a sensitive target of As toxicity (Chen et al., 2010). The As hyperaccumulating Pteris species differ from nonhyperaccumulating plants because of enhanced As(V) uptake (Wang et al., 2002; Poynton et al., 2004), little As(III)-thiol complexation (Zhao et al., 2003; Raab et al., 2004), and efficient xylem loading of As(III) (Su et al., 2008). Recently, an As(III) efflux transporter, PvACR3, has been found to play an important role in As(III) detoxification by transporting As(III) into vacuoles in Pteris vittata (Indriolo et al., 2010).With the exception of As hyperaccumulators, most plant species have a limited root-to-shoot translocation of As (Zhao et al., 2009). The chemical species of As in xylem exudate have been determined in a number of plant species. As(III) was found to be the predominant species (80%–100%) in the xylem sap of rice, tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), cucumber (Cucumis sativus), and P. vittata even when these plants were fed As(V) (Mihucz et al., 2005; Xu et al., 2007; Ma et al., 2008; Su et al., 2010), suggesting that As(V) is reduced in roots before being loaded into the xylem. In other plant species, such as Brassica juncea (Pickering et al., 2000), wheat, and barley (Hordeum vulgare; Su et al., 2010), As(V) accounted for larger proportions (40%–50%) of the total As in the xylem sap. Studies using HPLC-inductively coupled plasma (ICP)-mass spectrometry (MS) coupled with electrospray (ES)-MS showed no evidence of As(III)-thiol complexation in the xylem sap of sunflower (Helianthus annuus; Raab et al., 2005). When rice plants were exposed to MMA(V) or DMA(V), both As species were found in the xylem sap (Li et al., 2009). Generally, methylated As species are taken up by roots at slower rates than inorganic As, but they are more mobile during the xylem transport from roots to shoots (Marin et al., 1992; Raab et al., 2007; Li et al., 2009).It has been shown that phloem transport contributes substantially to As accumulation in rice grain (Carey et al., 2010). However, little is known about how As is transported in phloem (Zhao et al., 2009). There are no reports on the chemical species of As in phloem exudate. The speciation of As in phloem is important because it dictates how As is loaded in the source tissues and unloaded in the sink tissues, such as grain. Questions with regard to the oxidation state, methylation, and complexation of As in phloem sap remain to be answered. Unlike xylem sap, phloem sap is much more difficult to obtain in sufficient quantities for analysis. In this study, we investigated As speciation in phloem and xylem exudates of castor bean (Ricinus communis), which is widely used as a model plant to investigate phloem transport of solutes (e.g. Hall et al., 1971; Hall and Baker, 1972; Allen and Smith, 1986; Bromilow et al., 1987).     

Elucidating the Role of Transport Processes in Leaf Glucosinolate Distribution

In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), a strategy to defend its leaves against herbivores is to accumulate glucosinolates along the midrib and at the margin. Although it is generally assumed that glucosinolates are synthesized along the vasculature in an Arabidopsis leaf, thereby suggesting that the margin accumulation is established through transport, little is known about these transport processes. Here, we show through leaf apoplastic fluid analysis and glucosinolate feeding experiments that two glucosinolate transporters, GTR1 and GTR2, essential for long-distance transport of glucosinolates in Arabidopsis, also play key roles in glucosinolate allocation within a mature leaf by effectively importing apoplastically localized glucosinolates into appropriate cells. Detection of glucosinolates in root xylem sap unambiguously shows that this transport route is involved in root-to-shoot glucosinolate allocation. Detailed leaf dissections show that in the absence of GTR1 and GTR2 transport activity, glucosinolates accumulate predominantly in leaf margins and leaf tips. Furthermore, we show that glucosinolates accumulate in the leaf abaxial epidermis in a GTR-independent manner. Based on our results, we propose a model for how glucosinolates accumulate in the leaf margin and epidermis, which includes symplasmic movement through plasmodesmata, coupled with the activity of putative vacuolar glucosinolate importers in these peripheral cell layers.Feeding behavior of herbivorous insects and distribution of defense compounds in plants have been suggested to be a result of an arms race between plants and insects that has spanned millions of years (Ehrlich and Raven, 1964). Whether insects adapted first to plants or the other way around is an ongoing debate in this research field (Schoonhoven et al., 2005; Ali and Agrawal, 2012). Leaf margin accumulation of defense compounds has been demonstrated in various plant species (Gutterman and Chauser-Volfson, 2000; Chauser-Volfson et al., 2002; Kester et al., 2002; Cooney et al., 2012). In the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), higher concentration of glucosinolates, which constitute a major part of the chemical defense system in this plant (Kliebenstein et al., 2001a; Halkier and Gershenzon, 2006), was found at the leaf midrib and margins compared with the leaf lamina (Shroff et al., 2008; Sønderby et al., 2010). This nonuniform leaf distribution of glucosinolates appeared to explain the feeding pattern of a generalist herbivore (Helicoverpa armigera), as it avoided feeding at the leaf margin and midrib (Shroff et al., 2008). A similar feeding pattern on Arabidopsis was observed for a different generalist herbivore, Spodoptera littoralis (Schweizer et al., 2013). Interestingly, S. littoralis was shown to favor feeding from Arabidopsis leaf margins in glucosinolate-deficient mutants (Schweizer et al., 2013), which could indicate an inherent preference for margin feeding and that Arabidopsis adapted to such behavior by accumulating defense compounds here. A damaged leaf margin may be more critical for leaf stability than damage to inner leaf parts (Shroff et al., 2008), further motivating protection of this tissue. The margin-feeding preference of S. littoralis might be explained by better nutritional value of the leaf margin cells (Schweizer et al., 2013), which has been shown to consist of specialized elongated cell files (Koroleva et al., 2010; Nakata and Okada, 2013).Other distribution patterns have been reported for glucosinolates in an Arabidopsis leaf. A study investigating spatiotemporal metabolic shifts during senescence in Arabidopsis reported that fully expanded mature leaves exhibited a glucosinolate gradient from base to tip, with highest level of glucosinolates at the leaf base (Watanabe et al., 2013). In contrast to the horizontal plane, less has been reported on distribution of glucosinolates in the vertical plane of a leaf. A localization study of cyanogenic glucosides, defense molecules related to glucosinolates (Halkier and Gershenzon, 2006), determined that these compounds primarily were located in the epidermis of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor; Kojima et al., 1979). Whereas epidermis-derived trichomes in Arabidopsis were recently demonstrated to contain glucosinolates and to express glucosinolate biosynthetic genes (Frerigmann et al., 2012), no studies have investigated glucosinolates in the epidermal cell layer.Based on promoter-GUS studies, biosynthesis of glucosinolates in leaves of Arabidopsis has been associated with primarily major and minor veins in leaves and silique walls (Mikkelsen et al., 2000; Reintanz et al., 2001; Tantikanjana et al., 2001; Chen et al., 2003; Grubb et al., 2004; Schuster et al., 2006; Gigolashvili et al., 2007; Li et al., 2011; Redovniković et al., 2012). The discrepancy between vasculature-associated glucosinolate biosynthesis and margin accumulation of glucosinolates suggests that transport processes must be involved in establishing the distribution pattern of glucosinolates within a leaf.Plant transport systems include the apoplastic xylem, the symplastic phloem, and plasmodesmata. Xylem transport is mainly driven by an upward pull generated by transpiration from aerial plant organs, thereby directing transport to sites of rapid evaporation (such as leaf margins; Sattelmacher, 2001). Phloem flow is facilitated by an osmosis-regulated hydrostatic pressure difference between source and sink tissue, primarily generated by Suc bulk flow (Lucas et al., 2013). Plasmodesmata are intercellular channels that establish symplasmic pathways between neighboring cells, and most cell types in a plant are symplastically connected via plasmodesmata (Roberts and Oparka, 2003). Translocation of small molecules in these channels is driven by diffusion and is regulated developmentally as well as spatially to form symplastically connected domains (Roberts and Oparka, 2003; Christensen et al., 2009). To what extent any of these transport processes are involved in establishing specific distribution patterns of glucosinolates within leaves is not known.Recently, two plasma membrane-localized, glucosinolate-specific importers, GLUCOSINOLATE TRANSPORTER1 (GTR1) and GTR2, were identified in Arabidopsis (Nour-Eldin et al., 2012). In leaf, their expression patterns were shown to be in leaf veins (GTR1 and GTR2) and surrounding mesophyll cells (GTR1; Nour-Eldin et al., 2012). Absence of aliphatic and indole glucosinolates in seeds of the gtr1gtr2 double knockout (dKO) mutant (gtr1gtr2 dKO) demonstrated that these transporters are essential for long-distance glucosinolate transport to the seeds and indicates a role in phloem loading (Nour-Eldin et al., 2012). Another study investigating long-distance transport of glucosinolates in the 3-week-old wild type and gtr1gtr2 dKO indicated that GTR1 and GTR2 were involved in bidirectional transport of aliphatic glucosinolates between root and shoot via both phloem and xylem pathways (Andersen et al., 2013). The authors suggested a role for GTR1 and GTR2 in the retention of long-chained aliphatic glucosinolates in roots by removing the compounds from the xylem (Andersen et al., 2013).Identification of the glucosinolate transporters GTR1 and GTR2 has provided a molecular tool to investigate the role of transport processes in establishing leaf glucosinolate distribution. In this study, we have performed a detailed spatial investigation of the distribution of an exogenously fed glucosinolate (sinigrin) and endogenous glucosinolates within mature wild-type and gtr1gtr2 dKO Arabidopsis leaves, achieved by collecting and analyzing leaf parts at the horizontal (y axis: petiole, base, and tip; x axis: midrib, lamina, and margin) as well as at the vertical leaf plane (z axis: abaxial epidermis). Furthermore, we analyze wild-type and gtr1gtr2 dKO root xylem sap and leaf apoplastic fluids for glucosinolates. Based on our results, we propose a model where GTR1 and GTR2 import glucosinolates from the apoplast to the symplast and where the glucosinolate distribution pattern within an Arabidopsis leaf is established via symplasmic movement of glucosinolates through plasmodesmata, coupled with the activity of putative vacuolar glucosinolate importers in peripheral cell layers.