Rif-mDia1 interaction is involved in filopodium formation independent of Cdc42 and Rac effectors

Filopodia are cellular protrusions important for axon guidance, embryonic development, and wound healing. The Rho GTPase Cdc42 is the best studied inducer of filopodium formation, and several of its effectors and their interacting partners have been linked to the process. These include IRSp53, N-WASP, Mena, and Eps8. The Rho GTPase, Rif, also drives filopodium formation. The signaling pathway by which Rif induces filopodia is poorly understood, with mDia2 being the only protein implicated to date. It is thus not clear how distinct the Rif-driven pathway for filopodium formation is from the one mediated by Cdc42. In this study, we characterize the dynamics of Rif-induced filopodia by time lapse imaging of live neuronal cells and show that Rif drives filopodium formation via an independent pathway that does not involve the Cdc42 effectors N-WASP and IRSp53, the IRSp53 binding partner Mena, or the Rac effectors WAVE1 and WAVE2. Rif formed filopodia in the absence of N-WASP or Mena and when IRSp53, WAVE1, or WAVE2 was knocked down by RNAi. Rif-mediated filopodial protrusion was instead reduced by silencing mDia1 expression or overexpressing a dominant negative mutant of mDia1. mDia1 on its own was able to form filopodia. Data from acceptor photobleaching FRET studies of protein-protein interaction demonstrate that Rif interacts directly with mDia1 in filopodia but not with mDia2. Taken together, these results suggest a novel pathway for filopodia formation via Rif and mDia1.     

mDia1 and WAVE2 proteins interact directly with IRSp53 in filopodia and are involved in filopodium formation

Filopodia are dynamic actin-rich cell surface protrusions involved in cell migration, axon guidance, and wound healing. The RhoGTPase Cdc42 generates filopodia via IRSp53, a multidomain protein that links the processes of plasma membrane deformation and actin dynamics required for their formation in mammalian cells. The Src homology 3 domain of IRSp53 binds to the actin regulators Mena, Eps8, WAVE1, WAVE2, mDia1, and mDia2. We show that mDia1 and WAVE2 synergize with IRSp53 to form filopodia. IRSp53 also interacts directly with these two proteins within filopodia, as observed in acceptor photobleaching FRET studies. Measurement of filopodium formation by time-lapse imaging of live cells also revealed that depleting neuronal cells of either mDia1 or WAVE2 protein decreases the ability of IRSp53 to induce filopodia. In contrast, IRSp53 does not appear to partner WAVE1 or mDia2 to give rise to these structures. In addition, although all three isoforms of mDia are capable of inducing filopodia, IRSp53 requires only mDia1 to do so. These findings suggest that mDia1 and WAVE2 are important Src homology 3 domain partners of IRSp53 in forming filopodia.     

The Cdc42 effector IRSp53 generates filopodia by coupling membrane protrusion with actin dynamics

The Cdc42 effector IRSp53 is a strong inducer of filopodia formation and consists of an Src homology domain 3 (SH3), a potential WW-binding motif, a partial-Cdc42/Rac interacting binding region motif, and an Inverse-Bin-Amphiphysins-Rvs (I-BAR) domain.We show that IRSp53 interacts directly with neuronal Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (N-WASP) via its SH3 domain and furthermore that N-WASP is required for filopodia formation as IRSp53 failed to induce filopodia formation in N-WASP knock-out (KO) fibroblasts. IRSp53-induced filopodia formation can be reconstituted in N-WASP KO fibroblasts by full-length N-WASP, by N-WASPDeltaWA (a mutant unable to activate the Arp2/3 complex), and by N-WASPH208D (a mutant unable to bind Cdc42). IRSp53 failed to induce filopodia in mammalian enabled (Mena)/VASP KO cells, and N-WASP failed to induce filopodia when IRSp53 was knocked down with RNA interference. The IRSp53 I-BAR domain alone induces dynamic membrane protrusions that lack actin and are smaller than normal filopodia ("partial-filopodia") in both wild-type N-WASP and N-WASP KO cells. We propose that IRSp53 generates filopodia by coupling membrane protrusion through its I-BAR domain with actin dynamics through SH3 domain binding partners, including N-WASP and Mena.     

Regulation of cell shape by Cdc42 is mediated by the synergic actin-bundling activity of the Eps8-IRSp53 complex

Actin-crosslinking proteins organize actin into highly dynamic and architecturally diverse subcellular scaffolds that orchestrate a variety of mechanical processes, including lamellipodial and filopodial protrusions in motile cells. How signalling pathways control and coordinate the activity of these crosslinkers is poorly defined. IRSp53, a multi-domain protein that can associate with the Rho-GTPases Rac and Cdc42, participates in these processes mainly through its amino-terminal IMD (IRSp53 and MIM domain). The isolated IMD has actin-bundling activity in vitro and is sufficient to induce filopodia in vivo. However, the manner of regulation of this activity in the full-length protein remains largely unknown. Eps8 is involved in actin dynamics through its actin barbed-ends capping activity and its ability to modulate Rac activity. Moreover, Eps8 binds to IRSp53. Here, we describe a novel actin crosslinking activity of Eps8. Additionally, Eps8 activates and synergizes with IRSp53 in mediating actin bundling in vitro, enhancing IRSp53-dependent membrane extensions in vivo. Cdc42 binds to and controls the cellular distribution of the IRSp53-Eps8 complex, supporting the existence of a Cdc42-IRSp53-Eps8 signalling pathway. Consistently, Cdc42-induced filopodia are inhibited following individual removal of either IRSp53 or Eps8. Collectively, these results support a model whereby the synergic bundling activity of the IRSp53-Eps8 complex, regulated by Cdc42, contributes to the generation of actin bundles, thus promoting filopodial protrusions.     

Cdc42 induces filopodia by promoting the formation of an IRSp53:Mena complex.

BACKGROUND: The Rho GTPases Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 regulate the organization of the actin cytoskeleton by interacting with multiple, distinct downstream effector proteins. Cdc42 controls the formation of actin bundle-containing filopodia at the cellular periphery. The molecular mechanism for this remains as yet unclear. RESULTS: We report here that Cdc42 interacts with IRSp53/BAP2 alpha, an SH3 domain-containing scaffold protein, at a partial CRIB motif and that an N-terminal fragment of IRSp53 binds, via an intramolecular interaction, to the CRIB motif-containing central region. Overexpression of IRSp53 in fibroblasts leads to the formation of filopodia, and both this and Cdc42-induced filopodia are inhibited by expression of the N-terminal IRSp53 fragment. Using affinity chromatography, we have identified Mena, an Ena/VASP family member, as interacting with the SH3 domain of IRSp53. Mena and IRSp53 act synergistically to promote filopodia formation. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the interaction of Cdc42 with the partial CRIB motif of IRSp53 relieves an intramolecular, autoinhibitory interaction with the N terminus, allowing the recruitment of Mena to the IRSp53 SH3 domain. This IRSp53:Mena complex initiates actin filament assembly into filopodia.     

I-BAR domains,IRSp53 and filopodium formation

Filopodia and lamellipodia are dynamic actin-based structures that determine cell shape and migration. Filopodia are thought to sense the environment and direct processes such as axon guidance and neurite outgrowth. Cdc42 is a small GTP-binding protein and member of the RhoGTPase family. Cdc42 and its effector IRSp53 (insulin receptor phosphotyrosine 53 kDa substrate) have been shown to be strong inducers of filopodium formation. IRSp53 consists of an I-BAR (inverse-Bin-Amphiphysin-Rvs) domain, a Cdc42-binding domain and an SH3 domain. The I-BAR domain of IRSp53 induces membrane tubulation of vesicles and dynamic membrane protrusions lacking actin in cells. The IRSp53 SH3 domain interacts with proteins that regulate actin filament formation e.g. Mena, N-WASP, mDia1 and Eps8. In this review we suggest that the mechanism for Cdc42-driven filopodium formation involves coupling I-BAR domain-induced membrane protrusion with SH3 domain-mediated actin dynamics through IRSp53.     

The Rho family GTPase Rif induces filopodia through mDia2

Eukaryotic cells produce a variety of specialized actin-rich surface protrusions. These include filopodia-thin, highly dynamic projections that help cells to sense their external environment. Filopodia consist of parallel filaments of actin, bundled by actin crosslinking proteins. The filaments are oriented with their rapidly growing "barbed" ends at the protruding tip and their slowly growing "pointed" ends at the base. Extension occurs by polymerization at the tip and is controlled by regulation of filament capping. The Rho GTPase Cdc42 is a key mediator of filopodia formation, which it regulates through binding CRIB domain-containing effectors. Cdc42 binds and activates the WASP proteins, which in turn activate the actin-nucleating complex Arp2/3. It also binds and activates IRSp53, which recruits the Ena/WASP family protein Mena to the filopodial tip and protects elongating actin filaments from capping. Previously, we identified another Rho family GTPase, Rif, as a potent stimulator of filopodial protrusion through a mechanism that does not require Cdc42. Here we characterize the differences between filopodia induced by these two small GTPases and show that the Rif effector in this pathway is the Diaphanous-related formin mDia2. Thus, Rif and Cdc42 represent two distinct routes to the induction of filopodia-producing structures with both shared and unique properties.     

Interaction of p190RhoGAP with C-terminal Domain of p120-catenin Modulates Endothelial Cytoskeleton and Permeability

p120-catenin is a multidomain intracellular protein, which mediates a number of cellular functions, including stabilization of cell-cell transmembrane cadherin complexes as well as regulation of actin dynamics associated with barrier function, lamellipodia formation, and cell migration via modulation of the activities of small GTPAses. One mechanism involves p120 catenin interaction with Rho GTPase activating protein (p190RhoGAP), leading to p190RhoGAP recruitment to cell periphery and local inhibition of Rho activity. In this study, we have identified a stretch of 23 amino acids within the C-terminal domain of p120 catenin as the minimal sequence responsible for the recruitment of p190RhoGAP (herein referred to as CRAD; catenin-RhoGAP association domain). Expression of the p120-catenin truncated mutant lacking the CRAD in endothelial cells attenuated effects of barrier protective oxidized phospholipid, OxPAPC. This effect was accompanied by inhibition of membrane translocation of p190RhoGAP, increased Rho signaling, as well as suppressed activation of Rac1 and its cytoskeletal effectors PAK1 (p21-activated kinase 1) and cortactin. Expression of p120 catenin-truncated mutant lacking CRAD also delayed the recovery process after thrombin-induced endothelial barrier disruption. Concomitantly, RhoA activation and downstream signaling were sustained for a longer period of time, whereas Rac signaling was inhibited. These data demonstrate a critical role for p120-catenin (amino acids 820–843) domain in the p120-catenin·p190RhoGAP signaling complex assembly, membrane targeting, and stimulation of p190RhoGAP activity toward inhibition of the Rho pathway and reciprocal up-regulation of Rac signaling critical for endothelial barrier regulation.     

A novel actin bundling/filopodium-forming domain conserved in insulin receptor tyrosine kinase substrate p53 and missing in metastasis protein

Insulin receptor tyrosine kinase substrate p53 (IRSp53) has been identified as an SH3 domain-containing adaptor that links Rac1 with a Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome family verprolin-homologous protein 2 (WAVE2) to induce lamellipodia or Cdc42 with Mena to induce filopodia. The recruitment of these SH3-binding partners by IRSp53 is thought to be crucial for F-actin rearrangements. Here, we show that the N-terminal predicted helical stretch of 250 amino acids of IRSp53 is an evolutionarily conserved F-actin bundling domain involved in filopodium formation. Five proteins including IRSp53 and missing in metastasis (MIM) protein share this unique domain and are highly conserved in vertebrates. We named the conserved domain IRSp53/MIM homology domain (IMD). The IMD has domain relatives in invertebrates but does not show obvious homology to any known actin interacting proteins. The IMD alone, derived from either IRSp53 or MIM, induced filopodia in HeLa cells and the formation of tightly packed parallel F-actin bundles in vitro. These results suggest that IRSp53 and MIM belong to a novel actin bundling protein family. Furthermore, we found that filopodium-inducing IMD activity in the full-length IRSp53 was regulated by active Cdc42 and Rac1. The SH3 domain was not necessary for IMD-induced filopodium formation. Our results indicate that IRSp53, when activated by small GTPases, participates in F-actin reorganization not only in an SH3-dependent manner but also in a manner dependent on the activity of the IMD.     

Regulation of IRSp53-Dependent Filopodial Dynamics by Antagonism between 14-3-3 Binding and SH3-Mediated Localization

Filopodia are dynamic structures found at the leading edges of most migrating cells. IRSp53 plays a role in filopodium dynamics by coupling actin elongation with membrane protrusion. IRSp53 is a Cdc42 effector protein that contains an N-terminal inverse-BAR (Bin-amphipysin-Rvs) domain (IRSp53/MIM homology domain [IMD]) and an internal SH3 domain that associates with actin regulatory proteins, including Eps8. We demonstrate that the SH3 domain functions to localize IRSp53 to lamellipodia and that IRSp53 mutated in its SH3 domain fails to induce filopodia. Through SH3 domain-swapping experiments, we show that the related IRTKS SH3 domain is not functional in lamellipodial localization. IRSp53 binds to 14-3-3 after phosphorylation in a region that lies between the CRIB and SH3 domains. This association inhibits binding of the IRSp53 SH3 domain to proteins such as WAVE2 and Eps8 and also prevents Cdc42-GTP interaction. The antagonism is achieved by phosphorylation of two related 14-3-3 binding sites at T340 and T360. In the absence of phosphorylation at these sites, filopodium lifetimes in cells expressing exogenous IRSp53 are extended. Our work does not conform to current views that the inverse-BAR domain or Cdc42 controls IRSp53 localization but provides an alternative model of how IRSp53 is recruited (and released) to carry out its functions at lamellipodia and filopodia.The ability of a cell to rapidly respond to extracellular cues and direct cytoskeletal rearrangements is dependent on an array of signaling complexes that control actin assembly (58). The protrusive structures at the leading edges of motile cells are broadly defined as lamellipodia or filopodia (14). Lamellae are sheet-like protrusions composed of dendritic actin arrays that drive membrane expansion, with the “lamellipodium” representing a narrow region at the edge of the cell (in culture) characterized by rapid actin polymerization. This F-actin assembly is suggested to require Arp2/3 activity that nucleates new actin filaments from the sides of existing ones (58, 71) and capping proteins that limit the length of these new filaments and stabilize them (7). Arp2/3 activity in turn is regulated by the WASP/WAVE family of proteins, such as N-WASP and WAVE2 (68), whose regulation is a subject of intense interest (12, 29, 36, 41, 56, 76).Filopodia contain parallel bundles of actin filaments containing fascin (22). These are dynamic structures that emanate from the periphery of the cell and are retracted, with occasional attachment (to the dish in culture). Thus, they have been thought to have a sensory or exploratory role during cell migration (28). This is the case for neuronal growth cones, where filopodia sense attractant or repulsive cues and dictate direction in axonal path finding (9, 17, 25, 35). Filopodia have been shown to be important in the context of dendritic-spine development (64, 77), epithelial-sheet closure (26, 60, 79), and cell invasion/metastasis (80, 83).Lamellipodia have been well characterized since the pioneering work of Abercrombie et al. in the early 1970s (2, 3, 4). Filopodia require symmetry breaking at the leading edge (initiation), followed by elongation driven by a filopodial-tip protein complex (14, 28). A few proteins have been identified in this complex; Mena/Vasp serve to prevent capping at the barbed ends of bundled actin filaments (7, 53), and Dia2 promotes F-actin elongation (57, 85). Termination of filopodial elongation is not understood but nonetheless is likely to be tightly regulated. In the absence of F-actin elongation, retraction of the filopodium takes place by a rearward flow of F-actin and filament depolymerization (22).IRSp53 is in a position to play a pivotal role in generating filopodia; this brain-enriched protein was discovered as a substrate of the insulin receptor (87). Subsequently, IRSp53 was identified as an effector for Rac1 (50) and Cdc42 (27, 38), where it participates in filopodium and lamellipodium production (38, 51, 54, 86), neurite extension (27), dendritic-spine morphogenesis (1, 15, 66, 67), cell motility and invasiveness (24). The N terminus of IRSp53 contains a conserved helical domain that is found in five different gene products and is referred to as the IRSp53/MIM homology domain (IMD) (51, 70). This domain has been postulated to bind to Rac1 (50, 70) in a nucleotide-independent manner (52), but no convincing effector-like region has been identified. A Cdc42-specific CRIB-like sequence that does not bind Rac1 (27, 38) allows coupling of this and perhaps related Rho GTPases. The structure of the IMD reveals a zeppelin-shaped dimer that could bind “bent” membranes; thus, its potential as an F-actin-bundling domain (51, 82) could be an in vitro artifact often attributed to proteins with basic patches (46). Although there are reports of F-actin binding at physiological ionic strength (ca. 100 mM KCl) (82, 19), this region when expressed in isolation does not decorate F-actin in vivo.Two reports showed the IMD to be an “inverse-BAR” domain. BAR (Bin-amphipysin-Rvs) domains are found in proteins involved in endocytic trafficking, such as amphipysin and endophilin, and stabilize positively bent membranes, such as those on endocytic vesicles (31, 47). The IMD domains of both IRSp53 (70) and MIM-B (46) associate with lipids and can induce tubulations of PI(3,4,5)P₃ or PI(4,5)P₂-rich membranes, respectively. These tubulations are equivalent to membrane protrusions and are also referred to as negatively bent membranes. Ectopic expression of the IMD from IRSp53 (51, 70, 82, 86) or two other family members, MIM-B (11, 46) and IRTKS (52), can give rise to cells with many peripheral extensions. MIM-B is said to stimulate lamellipodia (11), while IRTKS generates “short actin clusters” at the cell periphery (52).In IRSp53 is a CRIB-like motif that mediates binding to Cdc42 (27, 38), but the function of this interaction in unclear. Cdc42 could relieve IRSp53 autoinhibition as described for N-Wasp (38), but there is little evidence for this. It has been suggested that Cdc42 controls IRSp53 localization and actin remodeling (27, 38), but another study indicated that these events are Cdc42 independent (19). IRSp53 contains a central SH3 domain that may bind proline-rich proteins, such as Dia1 (23), Mena (38), WAVE2 (49, 50, 69), and Eps8 (19, 24). However, it seems unlikely that all of these represent bona fide partners, and side-by-side comparison is provided in this study. Mena is involved in filopodium production (37), Dia1 in stress fiber formation (81), and WAVE2 in lamellipodium extension (72). Thus, Mena is a better candidate as a partner for IRSp53-mediated filopodia than Dia1 or WAVE2.There is good evidence for IRSp53 as a cellular partner for Eps8 (19). Eps8 is an adaptor protein containing an N-terminal PTB domain that can associate with receptor tyrosine kinases (65), and perhaps β integrins (13), and a C-terminal SH3 domain that can associate with Abi1 (30). Binding of the general adaptor Abi1 appears to positively regulate the actin-capping domain at the C terminus of Eps8 (18). It has been suggested that IRSp53 and Eps8 as a complex regulate cell motility, and perhaps Rac1 activation, via SOS (24); more recently, their roles in filopodium formation have been addressed (19). The involvement of IRSp53, but not MIM-B or IRTKS, in filopodium formation might be related to its role as a Cdc42 effector. We show here that, surprisingly, the CRIB motif is not essential for this activity, but rather, the ability of IRSp53 to associate via its SH3 domain is required, and that this domain is controlled by 14-3-3 binding.We have focused on the regulation of Cdc42 effectors that bind 14-3-3, including IRSp53 and PAK4, which are found as 14-3-3 targets in various proteomic projects (32, 44). In this study, we characterize the binding of 14-3-3 to IRSp53 and uncover how this activity regulates IRSp53 function. The phosphorylation-dependent 14-3-3 binding is GSK3β dependent, and 14-3-3 blocks the accessibility of both the CRIB and SH3 domains of IRSp53, thus indicating its primary function in controlling IRSp53 partners. This regulation of the SH3 domain by 14-3-3 is critical in the proper localization and termination of IRSp53 function to promote filopodium dynamics.     

Phosphorylation of the Cool-1/β-Pix Protein Serves as a Regulatory Signal for the Migration and Invasive Activity of Src-transformed Cells

Previously we showed that Cool-1 (Cloned out of library-1)/β-Pix (Pak-interactive exchange factor) is phosphorylated at a specific tyrosine residue (Tyr-442) in a Src-dependent manner and serves as a dual function guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF)/signaling-effector for Cdc42 that is essential for transformation by Src. Here, we show that knocking-down Cool-1 or overexpressing a Cool-1 mutant that contains substitutions within its Dbl homology domain and is defective for GEF activity, inhibits Src-promoted cell migration. Similarly, the expression of a Cool-1 mutant containing a tyrosine to phenylalanine substitution at position 442, making it incapable of being phosphorylated in response to serum, epidermal growth factor (EGF), or Src, also causes a significant inhibition of the migration and invasive activity of cells expressing oncogenic Src. We further demonstrate that the phosphorylation of Cool-1 at Tyr-442 weakens its ability to bind to one of its primary interaction-partners, Cat-1 (Cool-associated tyrosine phosphosubstrate-1)/Git-1 (G protein-coupled receptor kinase-interactor-1), thus making Cat more accessible for binding to paxillin. This enables cells to alternate between states where they contain large numbers of focal complexes (i.e. conditions favoring Cool-1-Cat interactions) versus reduced numbers of focal complexes (conditions favoring Cat-paxillin interactions). Overall, these findings show that the phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cycle of Cool-1 at Tyr-442 can serve as a key regulatory signal for focal complex assembly-disassembly, and consequently, for the migration and invasive activity of Src-transformed cells.     

The Eps8/IRSp53/VASP network differentially controls actin capping and bundling in filopodia formation

There is a body of literature that describes the geometry and the physics of filopodia using either stochastic models or partial differential equations and elasticity and coarse-grained theory. Comparatively, there is a paucity of models focusing on the regulation of the network of proteins that control the formation of different actin structures. Using a combination of in-vivo and in-vitro experiments together with a system of ordinary differential equations, we focused on a small number of well-characterized, interacting molecules involved in actin-dependent filopodia formation: the actin remodeler Eps8, whose capping and bundling activities are a function of its ligands, Abi-1 and IRSp53, respectively; VASP and Capping Protein (CP), which exert antagonistic functions in controlling filament elongation. The model emphasizes the essential role of complexes that contain the membrane deforming protein IRSp53, in the process of filopodia initiation. This model accurately accounted for all observations, including a seemingly paradoxical result whereby genetic removal of Eps8 reduced filopodia in HeLa, but increased them in hippocampal neurons, and generated quantitative predictions, which were experimentally verified. The model further permitted us to explain how filopodia are generated in different cellular contexts, depending on the dynamic interaction established by Eps8, IRSp53 and VASP with actin filaments, thus revealing an unexpected plasticity of the signaling network that governs the multifunctional activities of its components in the formation of filopodia.     

Filopodial focal complexes direct adhesion and force generation towards filopodia outgrowth

Filopodia are key structures within many cells that serve as sensors constantly probing the local environment. Although filopodia are involved in a number of different cellular processes, their function in migration is often analyzed with special focus on early processes of filopodia formation and the elucidation of filopodia molecular architecture. An increasing number of publications now describe the entire life cycle of filopodia, with analyses from the initial establishment of stable filopodium-substrate adhesion to their final integration into the approaching lamellipodium. We and others can now show the structural and functional dependence of lamellipodial focal adhesions as well as of force generation and transmission on filopodial focal complexes and filopodial actin bundles. These results were made possible by new high resolution imaging techniques as well as by recently developed elastomeric substrates and theoretical models. The data additionally provide strong evidence that formation of new filopodia depends on previously existing filopodia through a repetitive filopodial elongation of the stably adhered filopodial tips. In this commentary we therefore hypothesize a highly coordinated mechanism that regulates filopodia formation, adhesion, protein composition and force generation in a filopodia dependent step by step process.Key words: filopodia, focal adhesion, cell force, filopodial focal complex, actinCell protrusion depends on collaborative interactions of lamellipodia and filopodia.¹ Although filopodia cannot drive cell migration alone, in contrast to lamellipodia, they are essential for many cell biological functions such as guidance of neuronal growth cones² or during angiogenesis.³ Furthermore, filopodia are vital to cell-cell contact establishment as described for epithelial cells⁴ or during dorsal closure in Drosophila,⁵ and are also implicated in cancer cell metastasis.^6,7 Lamellipodia as well as filopodia can be formed independently from each other,⁸ and recent results implicate independent basic mechanisms of cytoskeletal regulation for their formation. While lamellipodia protrusion is a well accepted Arp2/3-dependent process where actin branches constantly form the protrusive force at the leading edge of the lamella,⁹ the details of filopodia formation are far from being understood.^10–13 Although earlier experiments indicated Arp2/3 was also involved in filopodia formation,¹⁴ recent results point to a machinery that is far less dependent, or even possibly independent, of Arp2/3 with formins being the central regulating molecules instead.⁸As soon as filopodia start to form, they constantly sense their environment upon elongation. Transmembrane proteins such as cadherins or integrins^15,16 connect filopodia to surrounding cells, extracellular matrix, or even pathogens to form stable contacts. When filopodial adhesion fails, retraction takes place.¹⁷ Although integrins and talin have been shown to be initially present at these sites in an un-clustered but active state, many additional adhesion proteins take part in filopodial focal complexes (filopodial FXs).^16,18 Starting from a small VASP-containing adhesion spot at the tip of filopodia, proteins such as vinculin, paxillin, talin, tensin and even zyxin form an elongated filopodial FX behind the VASP spot along the filopodium. While integrin as well as VASP transport along the filopodia shaft via myosin-X has been described,¹⁹ it is still unclear whether additional adhesion proteins are also actively transported or whether diffusion takes place. Diffusion is typically a non-limiting process during cytoplasmic protein complex formation. However for filopodia, diffusion could have an important regulatory function as already hypothesized in theoretical models,²⁰ because they are small in width and densely filled with actin filaments. Therefore, local concentrations of soluble adhesion molecules might drop within filopodia upon FX formation resulting in a pure physical regulation of filopodial length as well as filopodial FX size.The almost complete focal adhesion site specific protein inventory of filopodia FXs^16,18 as indicated above provided further indications for a dependency of lamellipodial focal adhesions (FAs) on filopodial FXs. This hypothesis was confirmed using fluorescent live cell imaging to identify the transition of filopodial FXs into fully assembled FAs upon FX contact with the leading edge of the lamellipodium. While filopodial FXs were responsible for only a sub-fraction of FAs in fish fibroblasts,¹⁸ stable FAs of human keratinocytes were formed almost exclusively by enlargement of existing filopodial FXs¹⁶ (see scheme, Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Filopodia determine the fate of lamellipodial structures. Filopodia are formed by actin polymerization at their tip. Upon stable adhesion, a small but fully assembled filopodial focal complex (FX) is formed. This FX becomes enlarged in size upon lamellipodial contact to form focal adhesions. In parallel, the filopodial actin cross-linker fascin becomes exchanged by palladin and α-actinin as soon as the filopodial actin bundles are incorporated into the lamellipodium. In a next step, α-actinin becomes partially exchanged by myosin II, leading to enhanced force values applied at filopodial-originated FA sites bound to the substrate. The tight interaction between FAs and filopodial actin bundles reduces the actin retrograde flow within the filopodium in front of the FA (lower inlay) compared to filopodia lacking stable FAs in the lamellipodium (not shown). Adhesion sites formed in the lamellipodium lack connections to distinct actin bundles leading to low force application at these sites and short lifetimes (upper inlay).The structural dependency of lamellipodial complexes on filopodial protein aggregates could be also shown for actin bundles. Here, parallel oriented actin filaments become cross-linked by proteins such as fascin or IRSp53-Eps8-complex upon filopodia formation.^21,22 These tightly packed bundles of 15–30 single actin filaments originate from the lamellipodial actin meshwork.²³ Interestingly, filopodial actin bundles in turn also affect lamellipodial actin structures independent of whether the filopodium adheres in a stable manner or looses contact. Nemethova et al.¹⁸ described the contribution of non-adhering filopodia to the construction of concave bundles of actin filaments within the lamellipodium of fish fibroblasts. These bundles often extended in length and interconnected with adjacent bundles. Similar observations were found for fibroblasts of chicken embryos and neuronal growth cones.^24,25 Here, filopodial actin bundles were clearly shown to be the origin of nearly 85% of all actin bundles found in the lamella. These actin filaments typically pointed towards the direction of migration. Additionally, myosin II was associated with these filopodial derived actin filaments to form polarized actin bundles. Of equal importance are findings presented by Schäfer et al. in this issue. The authors analyzed the fate of stably adhered filopodia and identified a stepwise exchange of filopodial fascin against the actin cross-linker proteins palladin and especially α-actinin in areas where filopodia were just overgrown by the lamellipodial leading edge (schematically presented in Fig. 1). α-Actinin further induced incorporation of myosin II into filopodial actin bundles in the lamellipodium. The authors additionally found that FAs displayed an enhanced lifetime when adhered to these myosin containing actin filaments. Therefore, these findings could also explain the unusual stability of filopodial actin filaments in neuronal growth cones observed by Mallavarapu and Mitchison.¹⁷ For keratinocytes, filopodia-dependent actin bundles are the only myosin containing actin structures oriented in the direction of movement within the lamellipodium and the lamella. Sensitivity and resolution improvements in cell force analyses further proved that these actin bundles were responsible for almost the entire force transmitted from the lamellipodium of migrating keratinocytes to the substrate. These forces were transferred at FA sites emerging from filopodial FXs, proving the importance of filopodia in lamellipodial structures and functions. Although filopodia-independent adhesion sites are also formed in keratinocytes right behind the leading edge, these sites are neither connected to detectable actin filament bundles nor do they transmit significant forces (see scheme, Fig. 1). Consequently, their sizes and life spans are strongly reduced (Schäfer et al., this issue).Recent results in keratinocytes additionally close the circle from stably adhered filopodia to the generation of new ones. Our original observations indicated that new filopodia were mainly formed in a direct extension of focal adhesions. Since these adhesion sites also depended on previously adhered filopodial FXs, a closer look revealed a consecutive outgrowth of the same filopodia.¹⁶ These cycles were only interrupted when outgrowing filopodia did not adhere in a stable manner between outgrowth cycles. Present results suggest that the same tip complex is present in all subsequently formed filopodia with a VASP tip signal remaining in place during successive filopodial elongations. As a result, well aligned, consecutive elongated focal adhesions can be found in keratinocytes. We can only speculate whether such an Arp2/3-independent mechanism describes a basic principle in filopodia formation at this point, but similar results have been observed for fish fibroblasts with a repetitive and alternating transition between filopodia and microspikes as filopodia-like structures barely extending over the lamellipodial leading edge.¹⁸The strong interdependency between lamellipodial FAs and stably adhered filopodia is also highlighted by actin retrograde flow analyses in keratinocytes (Schäfer et al. this issue). Retrograde actin flow is generated by actin polymerization at the cell front and myosin activity pulling the filaments rearwards. The interaction of actin with FAs is known to dampen flow rates in front of lamellipodial FAs.²⁶ Furthermore, filamentous-actin dynamics measured in lung epithelial cells showed a fast retrograde actin flow at the leading edge compared to rates within the lamellae. The highest flow rates were in the range of 0.3–0.5 µm/min.²⁷ Interestingly, keratocytes exhibited ten times slower flow rates at the leading edge,²⁸ indicating that retrograde flow strongly depends on the cell type analyzed. Actin filaments polymerizing at the tips of filopodia also undergo retrograde flow, but these flow rates are much faster compared to those found in lamellipodia,²⁴ as shown by bleaching experiments in chick embryo fibroblasts with flow rates approximately two-fold faster in filaments derived from filopodia compared to flow rates measured within the lamellipodium. These flow rates of approximately 1.3 µm/min were similar to those found for filopodia in other studies.²² Furthermore, we could show that this retrograde flow rate strongly depends on stable FAs formed behind the filopodium (Schäfer et al. this issue and Fig. 1). In the absence of these FAs, actin retrograde flow is doubled once more to rates of approximately 2.5 µm/min in filopodia. Therefore, although rates of FAs containing filopodia are still much higher than those found in lamellipodia, these rates are still slowed down indicating an effective connection between FAs and filopodial actin. These results further imply that myosin II incorporation into filopodial-originated actin bundles is responsible for enhanced retrograde flow rates in filopodia compared to rates found in the lamellipodium and that myosin II incorporation does not depend on stably adhered FAs directly behind filopodia. These data also strongly support the hypothesis that new filopodia form in front of stable lamellipodial FAs. It will be an intriguing question for future studies to analyze whether the reduced retrograde flow speeds in front of lamellipodial FAs might even be a prerequisite for efficient assembly and stable adhesion of small filopodial FXs, or perhaps even for filopodia formation in general.Taking into account all the currently known functions of filopodia, the presented results finally indicate that filopodia might be characterized best not only by one but actually two main functions. The first function is environmental sensing. Various transmembrane proteins can be involved leading to various roles for filopodia such as formation of cell-cell or cell-matrix interactions.^5,15 Although these functions in environmental sensing seem to be highly diverse, force generation along filopodial-originated actin bundles as the second function for filopodia might be of universal importance independent of the cell type that forms them. Force transmission along cell-pathogen interacting filopodia have been observed,²⁹ and the formation of adherens junctions after filopodia mediated cell-cell interaction is also a cell force dependent process.⁵ Therefore, these observations fit well to the currently presented data by Schäfer et al. (this issue) proving the importance of filopodia-dependent cell matrix interactions in cell force generation in the direction of migration (see scheme, Fig. 1).Present in almost every moving cell type, filopodia are therefore much more than just sensors for environmental conditions. In fact, these needle-like structures are the starting point for essential structures of adhesion and movement. Independent of whether they adhere stably or not, filopodia define the position of cellular adhesion sites, actin bundles, cell force generation and application, and, finally, the new filopodia to be formed.     

A Small GTPase Activator Protein Interacts with Cytoplasmic Phytochromes in Regulating Root Development

Phytochromes enable plants to sense light information and regulate developmental responses. Phytochromes interact with partner proteins to transmit light signals to downstream components for plant development. PIRF1 (phytochrome-interacting ROP guanine-nucleotide exchange factor (RopGEF 1)) functions as a light-signaling switch regulating root development through the activation of ROPs (Rho-like GTPase of plant) in the cytoplasm. In vitro pulldown and yeast two-hybrid assays confirmed the interaction between PIRF1 and phytochromes. PIRF1 interacted with the N-terminal domain of phytochromes through its conserved PRONE (plant-specific ROP nucleotide exchanger) region. PIRF1 also interacted with ROPs and activated them in a phytochrome-dependent manner. The Pr form of phytochrome A enhanced the RopGEF activity of PIRF1, whereas the Pfr form inhibited it. A bimolecular fluorescence complementation analysis demonstrated that PIRF1 was localized in the cytoplasm and bound to the phytochromes in darkness but not in light. PIRF1 loss of function mutants (pirf1) of Arabidopsis thaliana showed a longer root phenotype in the dark. In addition, both PIRF1 overexpression mutants (PIRF1-OX) and phytochrome-null mutants (phyA-211 and phyB-9) showed retarded root elongation and irregular root hair formation, suggesting that PIRF1 is a negative regulator of phytochrome-mediated primary root development. We propose that phytochrome and ROP signaling are interconnected through PIRF1 in regulating the root growth and development in Arabidopsis.     

Mammalian Adenylyl Cyclase-associated Protein 1 (CAP1) Regulates Cofilin Function,the Actin Cytoskeleton,and Cell Adhesion

CAP (adenylyl cyclase-associated protein) was first identified in yeast as a protein that regulates both the actin cytoskeleton and the Ras/cAMP pathway. Although the role in Ras signaling does not extend beyond yeast, evidence supports that CAP regulates the actin cytoskeleton in all eukaryotes including mammals. In vitro actin polymerization assays show that both mammalian and yeast CAP homologues facilitate cofilin-driven actin filament turnover. We generated HeLa cells with stable CAP1 knockdown using RNA interference. Depletion of CAP1 led to larger cell size and remarkably developed lamellipodia as well as accumulation of filamentous actin (F-actin). Moreover, we found that CAP1 depletion also led to changes in cofilin phosphorylation and localization as well as activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and enhanced cell spreading. CAP1 forms complexes with the adhesion molecules FAK and Talin, which likely underlie the cell adhesion phenotypes through inside-out activation of integrin signaling. CAP1-depleted HeLa cells also had substantially elevated cell motility as well as invasion through Matrigel. In summary, in addition to generating in vitro and in vivo evidence further establishing the role of mammalian CAP1 in actin dynamics, we identified a novel cellular function for CAP1 in regulating cell adhesion.     

Ankyrin Repeat Domain Protein 2 and Inhibitor of DNA Binding 3 Cooperatively Inhibit Myoblast Differentiation by Physical Interaction

Ankyrin repeat domain protein 2 (ANKRD2) translocates from the nucleus to the cytoplasm upon myogenic induction. Overexpression of ANKRD2 inhibits C2C12 myoblast differentiation. However, the mechanism by which ANKRD2 inhibits myoblast differentiation is unknown. We demonstrate that the primary myoblasts of mdm (muscular dystrophy with myositis) mice (pMB^mdm) overexpress ANKRD2 and ID3 (inhibitor of DNA binding 3) proteins and are unable to differentiate into myotubes upon myogenic induction. Although suppression of either ANKRD2 or ID3 induces myoblast differentiation in mdm mice, overexpression of ANKRD2 and inhibition of ID3 or vice versa is insufficient to inhibit myoblast differentiation in WT mice. We identified that ANKRD2 and ID3 cooperatively inhibit myoblast differentiation by physical interaction. Interestingly, although MyoD activates the Ankrd2 promoter in the skeletal muscles of wild-type mice, SREBP-1 (sterol regulatory element binding protein-1) activates the same promoter in the skeletal muscles of mdm mice, suggesting the differential regulation of Ankrd2. Overall, we uncovered a novel pathway in which SREBP-1/ANKRD2/ID3 activation inhibits myoblast differentiation, and we propose that this pathway acts as a critical determinant of the skeletal muscle developmental program.     

A bacterial cytotoxin identifies the RhoA exchange factor Net1 as a key effector in the response to DNA damage

Background

Exposure of adherent cells to DNA damaging agents, such as the bacterial cytolethal distending toxin (CDT) or ionizing radiations (IR), activates the small GTPase RhoA, which promotes the formation of actin stress fibers and delays cell death. The signalling intermediates that regulate RhoA activation and promote cell survival are unknown.

Principal Findings

We demonstrate that the nuclear RhoA-specific Guanine nucleotide Exchange Factor (GEF) Net1 becomes dephosphorylated at a critical inhibitory site in cells exposed to CDT or IR. Expression of a dominant negative Net1 or Net1 knock down by iRNA prevented RhoA activation, inhibited the formation of stress fibers, and enhanced cell death, indicating that Net1 activation is required for this RhoA-mediated responses to genotoxic stress. The Net1 and RhoA-dependent signals involved activation of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase p38 and its downstream target MAPK-activated protein kinase 2.

Significance

Our data highlight the importance of Net1 in controlling RhoA and p38 MAPK mediated cell survival in cells exposed to DNA damaging agents and illustrate a molecular pathway whereby chronic exposure to a bacterial toxin may promote genomic instability.     

Src Kinase Determines the Dynamic Exchange of the Docking Protein NEDD9 (Neural Precursor Cell Expressed Developmentally Down-regulated Gene 9) at Focal Adhesions

Dynamic exchange of molecules between the cytoplasm and integrin-based focal adhesions provides a rapid response system for modulating cell adhesion. Increased residency time of molecules that regulate adhesion turnover contributes to adhesion stability, ultimately determining migration speed across two-dimensional surfaces. In the present study we test the role of Src kinase in regulating dynamic exchange of the focal adhesion protein NEDD9/HEF1/Cas-L. Using either chemical inhibition or fibroblasts genetically null for Src together with fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), we find that Src significantly reduces NEDD9 exchange at focal adhesions. Analysis of NEDD9 mutant constructs with the two major Src-interacting domains disabled revealed the greatest effects were due to the NEDD9 SH2 binding domain. This correlated with a significant change in two-dimensional migratory speed. Given the emerging role of NEDD9 as a regulator of focal adhesion stability, the time of NEDD9 association at the focal adhesions is key in modulating rates of migration and invasion. Our study suggests that Src kinase activity determines NEDD9 exchange at focal adhesions and may similarly modulate other focal adhesion-targeted Src substrates to regulate cell migration.     

BRIZ1 and BRIZ2 Proteins Form a Heteromeric E3 Ligase Complex Required for Seed Germination and Post-germination Growth in Arabidopsis thaliana

Ubiquitin pathway E3 ligases are an important component conferring specificity and regulation in ubiquitin attachment to substrate proteins. The Arabidopsis thaliana RING (Really Interesting New Gene) domain-containing proteins BRIZ1 and BRIZ2 are essential for normal seed germination and post-germination growth. Loss of either BRIZ1 (At2g42160) or BRIZ2 (At2g26000) results in a severe phenotype. Heterozygous parents produce progeny that segregate 3:1 for wild-type:growth-arrested seedlings. Homozygous T-DNA insertion lines are recovered for BRIZ1 and BRIZ2 after introduction of a transgene containing the respective coding sequence, demonstrating that disruption of BRIZ1 or BRIZ2 in the T-DNA insertion lines is responsible for the observed phenotype. Both proteins have multiple predicted domains in addition to the RING domain as follows: a BRAP2 (BRCA1-Associated Protein 2), a ZnF UBP (Zinc Finger Ubiquitin Binding protein), and a coiled-coil domain. In vitro, both BRIZ1 and BRIZ2 are active as E3 ligases but only BRIZ2 binds ubiquitin. In vitro synthesized and purified recombinant BRIZ1 and BRIZ2 preferentially form hetero-oligomers rather than homo-oligomers, and the coiled-coil domain is necessary and sufficient for this interaction. BRIZ1 and BRIZ2 co-purify after expression in tobacco leaves, which also requires the coiled-coil domain. BRIZ1 and BRIZ2 coding regions with substitutions in the RING domain are inactive in vitro and, after introduction, fail to complement their respective mutant lines. In our current model, BRIZ1 and BRIZ2 together are required for formation of a functional ubiquitin E3 ligase in vivo, and this complex is required for germination and early seedling growth.