The development of ipsilateral retinal projections into the tectum in the cichlid fish Haplochromis burtoni: A dil study in fixed tissue

The normal development of the retinal projection was studied in a bony fish with Dil. Between 5.5 and 10 days postfertilization the contralateral retinal projection grows from the rostral pole of the tectum across its center. A maximum of 15 retinal fibers reaches the ipsilateral tectum. In 33-day-old juvenile animals, less than 15 ipsilateral fibers terminate in the entire tectum. Ipsilaterally projecting ganglion cells (maximal number = 20 cells) are scattered throughout the entire retina, and the location of ganglion cells in the retina and axonal terminations in the tectum display a large interindividual variability. This suggests that the small adult contingent of ipsilateral fibers in this bony fish develops without an initial exuberant ipsilateral retinal projection that is later pruned back. © 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Ipsilateral retinal projections into the tectum during regeneration of the optic nerve in the cichlid fish Haplochromis burtoni: a Dil study in fixed tissue.

Retinal projections were experimentally manipulated in a bony fish to reveal conditions under which considerably enlarged ipsilateral projections developed and persisted. Three experimental groups were studied: animals after unilateral enucleation, after unilateral nerve crush, and after enucleation and crush of the remaining optic nerve. At 29 days after unilateral enucleation alone, no enhanced ipsilateral projection had developed. After nerve crush, however, large numbers of retinal fibers regenerated into the ipsilateral tectum. Retrogradely filled, ipsilaterally projecting ganglion cells were distributed throughout the entire retina. After 15 days regenerating retinal fibers covered the entire ipsilateral tectum. At later stages the ipsilateral projection showed progressive reduction in coverage of the tectum. Combining enucleation with nerve crush led to an ipsilateral projection that covered the tectum at 28 days and later. In this experimental situation the development of an ipsilateral projection appears to be a two-step process: (1) Fibers are rerouted to the ipsilateral side at the diencephalon, and (2) ipsilateral fibers persist in the tectum only in the absence of a contralateral projection while they appear to be eliminated in the other cases.     

Ipsilateral retinal projections into the tectum during regeneration of the optic nerve in the cichlid fish Haplochromis burtoni: A dil study in fixed tissue

Retinal projections were experimentally manipulated in a bony fish to reveal conditions under which considerably enlarged ipsilateral projections developed and persisted. Three experimental groups were studied: animals after unilateral enucleation, after unilateral nerve crush, and after enucleation and crush of the remaining optic nerve. At 29 days after unilateral enucleation alone, no enhanced ipsilateral projection had developed. After nerve crush, however, large numbers of retinal fibers regenerated into the ipsilateral tectum. Retrogradely filled, ipsilaterally projecting ganglion cells were distributed throughout the entire retina. After 15 days regenerating retinal fibers covered the entire ipsilateral tectum. At later stages the ipsilateral projection showed progressive reduction in coverage of the tectum. Combining enucleation with nerve crush led to an ipsilateral projection that covered the tectum at 28 days and later. In this experimental situation the development of an ipsilateral projection appears to be a two-step process: (1) Fibers are rerouted to the ipsilateral side at the diencephalon, and (2) ipsilateral fibers persist in the tectum only in the absence of a contralateral projection while they appear to be eliminated in the other cases. © 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Evidence for a driving role of ingrowing axons for the shifting of older retinal terminals in the tectum of fish.

In amphibians and teleosts, retina and tectum grow incongruently. In order to maintain the retinotopy of the retinotectal projection, Gaze, Keating, and Chung (1974) postulated a shifting of terminals throughout growth. In order to test the possibility that ingrowing retinal fibers are the driving force for this shifting, we induced a permanent retinal projection into the ipsilateral tectum in juveniles of the cichlid fish Haplochromis burtoni. The surface of the tectum had increased (11-18 months later) 2.5-5.8 times, and the surface of the retina 8.6-14 times. Filling of ganglion cells with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) retrogradely from the tectum showed ipsilaterally regenerating ganglion cells only in the center of the retina. The position of ganglion cells indicated that the ipsilateral projection derived only from axotomized and regenerating retinal ganglion cells but not from those newly born. Ipsilaterally projecting retinal fibers showed terminals only in the rostral half of the tectum. Comparison of area of terminations of ipsilaterally projecting ganglion cells at various times after the crush provided no evidence for expansion or a shift into caudal tectal areas throughout the period of growth. These findings are compatible with the idea that newly ingrowing fibers induce older terminals to move caudally.     

Evidence for a driving role of ingrowing axons for the shifting of older retinal terminals in the tectum of fish

In amphibians and teleosts, retina and tectum grow incongruently. In order to maintain the retinotopy of the retinotectal projection, Gaze, Keating, and Chung (1974) postulated a shifting of terminals throughout growth. In order to test the possibility that ingrowing retinal fibers are the driving force for this shifting, we induced a permanent retinal projection into the ipsilateral tectum in juveniles of the cichlid fish Haplochromis burtoni. The surface of the tectum had increased (11–18 months later) 2.5–5.8 times, and the surface of the retina 8.6–14 times. Filling of ganglion cells with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) retrogradely from the tectum showed ipsilaterally regenerating ganglion cells only in the center of the retina. The position of ganglion cells indicated that the ipsilateral projection derived only from axotomized and regenerating retinal ganglion cells but not from those newly born. Ipsilaterally projecting retinal fibers showed terminals only in the rostral half of the tectum. Comparison of area of terminations of ipsilaterally projecting ganglion cells at various times after the crush provided no evidence for expansion or a shift into caudal tectal areas throughout the period of growth. These findings are compatible with the idea that newly ingrowing fibers induce older terminals to move caudally.     

Regenerating retinal fibers display error-free homing along undamaged normal fibers

After crushing one optic nerve in a bony fish, retinal fibers regenerate to both tecta. Anterograde labelling indicates that the ipsilaterally regenerating fibers have a rather straight growth, apparently along the undamaged fibers of the contralateral retina. In contrast, the contralaterally regenerating fibers deviate widely from a straight course. Retrograde labelling shows a mirror-symmetric distribution of regenerated ipsilateral and resident contralateral ganglion cells in a comparable annulus. In contrast, ganglion cells in the regenerated contralateral retina show no topological order after comparable small Dil applications to the ventrolateral tectum. These data suggest that regenerating fibers can orient on the undisturbed, contralateral fibers. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Retinotectal plasticity in Xenopus: Anomalous ipsilateral projection following late larval eye removal

The left eye was removed from Stage 56 Xenopus tadpoles. Two to 9 months after metamorphosis, electrophysiologic analysis showed that the surviving (right) eye mediated a normal visual field projection to the left (contralateral) optic tectum. In addition, a peripheral region of the same retina innervated the entire right (ipsilateral) tectum. Primary evidence that indicates this anomalous ipsilateral projection was due to direct retina-to-tectum innervation comes from singleunit analysis, latency measurements, and tectal lesion studies. Thus, the peripheral retina simultaneously connected in much different patterns to the two optic tecta, solely on the basis of the presence (in the left tectum) or absence (in the right tectum) of central retinal fibers. This documents a role for fiber-fiber interaction (such as repulsion or competition) acting in combination with fiber-tectum interactions in the formation of the retinotectal map.     

Up-regulation of protein kinase C in regenerating optic nerve fibers of goldfish: Immunohistochemistry and kinase activity assay

Protein kinase C (PKC) activation has been associated with synaptic plasticity in many projections, and manipulating PKC in the retinotectal projection strongly affects the activity-driven sharpening of the retinotopic map. This study examined levels of PKC in the regenerating retinotectal projection via immunostaining and assay of activity. A polyclonal antibody to the conserved C2 (Ca²⁺ binding) domain of classical PKC isozymes (anti-panPKC) recognized a single band at 79–80 kD on Western blots of goldfish brain. It stained one class of retinal bipolar cells and the ganglion cells in normal retina, as shown previously. Strong staining was not present in the optic fiber layer of retina or in optic nerve, optic tract, or terminal zone in tectum, with the exception of a single fascicle of optic nerve fibers that by their location and by L1 (E587) staining were identified as those arising from newly added ganglion cells at the retinal margin. Normal tectal sections showed dark staining of a subclass of type XIV neuron with somas at the top of the periventricular layer and an apical dendrite ascending to stratum opticum. In regenerating retina, swollen ganglion cells stained darkly and stained axons were seen in the optic fiber layer. In regenerating optic nerve (2–11 weeks postcrush), all fascicles of optic fibers stained darkly for both PKC and L1(E587). At 5 weeks postcrush, PKC staining could also be seen in the medial and lateral optic tracts and stratum opticum at the front half of the tectum and very lightly over the terminal zones. PKC activity was measured in homogenized tissues dissected from a series of fish with unilateral nerve crush from 1 to 5 weeks previously. Activity levels stimulated by phorbols and Ca²⁺ were measured by phosphorylation of a specific peptide and referred to levels measured in the opposite control side. Regeneration did not increase overall PKC activity in retina or tectum, but in optic nerve there was an 80% rise after the first week. The increased activity verifies that the increased staining in nerve represented an up-regulation of functional PKC during nerve regeneration. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Neurobiol 36: 315–324, 1998     

Retinal neural progenitors express topographic map markers

Transplantation of neural stem cells for replacing neurons after neurodegeneration requires that the transplanted stem cells accurately reestablish the lost neural circuits in order to restore function. Retinal ganglion cell axons project to visual centers of the brain forming circuits in precise topographic order. In chick, dorsal retinal neurons project to ventral optic tectum, ventral neurons to dorsal tectum, anterior neurons to posterior tectum and posterior neurons to anterior tectum; forming a continuous point-to-point map of retinal cell position in the tectal projection. We found that when stem cells derived from ventral retina were implanted in dorsal host retina, the stem cells that became ganglion cells projected to dorsal tectum, appropriate for their site of origin in retina but not appropriate for their site of implant in retina. This led us to ask if retinal progenitors exhibit topographic markers of cell position in retina. Indeed, retinal neural progenitors express topographic markers: dorsal stem cells expressed more Ephrin B2 than ventral stem cells and, conversely, ventral stem cells expressed more Pax-2 and Ventroptin than dorsal stem cells. The fact that neural progenitors express topographic markers has pertinent implications in using neural stem cells in cell replacement therapy for replacing projecting neurons that express topographic order, e.g., analogous neurons of the visual, auditory, somatosensory and motor systems.     

Ocular dominance stripe formation by regenerated isogenic double temporal retina in Xenopus laevis

In lower vertebrates such as frogs and fish, long ocular dominance stripes with anterior-posterior (A-P) orientation can be produced by causing both eyes to innervate one optic tectum during the course of development. Similar experiments on adult animals usually produce patches rather than stripes. During development, new retinal fibers from the nasal retina segregate into appropriate stripes at the growing edge of the posterior (P) tectum while new temporal fibers segregate at the non-growing anterior (A) tectal edge. Fiber segregation into long A-P oriented stripes might depend upon a template produced by new nasal fibers initiating stripe orientation in the vicinity of new tectal cells; new nasal fibers would orient to the nascent (posterior) edge of the template while temporal fibers would orient to the anterior (non-growing) end of the template. To test the dependence of stripe formation on the matching of nascent retinal cells with nascent tectal cells, we compared stripe orientation in animals with isogenic double nasal innervation and isogenic double temporal innervation of the tectum. In double nasal innervation, the oldest retinal cells innervate the anterior tectum; new fibers from the entire retinal periphery always innervate the newest tectal cells at the posterior tectum. Stripes are oriented A-P, consistent with a maturation front model. In contrast, the oldest retinal cells innervate the newest (posterior) tectal cells in double temporal innervation of the tectum; the growing retinal periphery innervates the non-growing anterior tectum. Stripes are also oriented A-P, indicating that the production of long stripes does not depend upon maturation front matching of nascent retinal fibers and nascent tectal cells.     

金鱼再生的视神经在顶盖投射精确化的DiI顺行标记研究

本文用微量显微注射法,在金鱼视网膜的背侧用亲脂类荧光染料DiI标记少量神经节细胞,通过顺行标记研究了视神经再生过程中视网膜顶盖投射的精确化过程。在损伤视神经后的不同时期观察了再生视神经纤维在顶盖整装片上的分布。在再生早期它们以超出正常的途径由背腹两侧进入顶盖,广泛分布。但其中大部分仍分布于顶盖腹侧的靶区。在再生晚期通过精确化,重建如正常鱼一样精确的视网膜顶盖投射。这个精确化过程表现在以下三方面:(1)再生于顶盖错误区域的再生视神经纤维的消失;(2)再生早期视神经纤维主干上生长的侧部分支的消失;(3)到达靶区的再生视神经纤维形成重迭的终末分支。由以上结果推测,顶盖中可能存在两类不同的因子:一类是普通诱向因子,存在于整个顶盖中,它在再生早期引导再生的视神经纤维长入顶盖。另一类是神经营养因子,它具区域特异性,在再生晚期引导视神经纤维到达顶盖靶区,形成精确的视网膜顶盖投射。     

Selective stabilization of retinotectal synapses by an activity-dependent mechanism

How does each ingrowing retinal fiber select the right spot in the overall retinotopic projection? Chemospecific surface interactions appear to be sufficient only to organize a crude retinotopic map on the tectum during regeneration of the optic nerve of goldfish. Precise retinotopic ordering is achieved via an activity-dependent stabilization of appropriate synapses, based on the correlated activity of neighboring ganglion cells of the same receptive field type in the retina. Four treatments have been found to block the sharpening process: 1) blocking activity of the ganglion cells with intraocular tetrodotoxin (TTX); 2) rearing in total darkness; 3) correlated activation of all ganglion cells via stroboscopic illumination in a featureless environment; 4) block of retinotectal synaptic transmission with alpha-bungarotoxin. These experiments support a role for normal visually driven activity in sharpening the diffuse projection, and demonstrate that the correlated activity of the optic fibers interacts within the postsynaptic cells, probably through the summation of excitatory postsynaptic potentials. Intraocular TTX experiments suggest that a similar mechanism may drive both the formation of ocular dominance patches in fish tectum and kitten visual cortex and the segregation of different receptive field types in the lateral geniculate nucleus. Thus, it may be a general mechanism whereby the diffuse projections of early development are brought to a mature level of organization.     

Rotation of the tectal primordium reveals plasticity of target recognition in retinotectal projection

Retinotectal projection is precisely organized in a retinotopic manner. In normal projection, temporal retinal axons project to the rostral part of the tectum, and nasal axons to the caudal part of the tectum. The two-dimensional relationship between the retina and the tectum offers a useful experimental system for analysis of neuronal target recognition. We carried out rotation of the tectal primordium in birds at an early stage of development, around the 10-somite stage, to achieve a better understanding of the characteristics of target recognition, especially the rostrocaudal specificity of the tectum. Our results showed that temporal retinal axons projected to the rostral part of the rotated tectum, which was originally caudal, and that nasal axons projected to the caudal part of the rotated tectum, which was originally rostral. Therefore, the tectum that had been rotated at the 10-somite stage received normal topographic projection from the retinal ganglion cells. Rostrocaudal specificity of the tectum for target recognition is not determined by the 10-somite stage and is acquired through interactions between the tectal primordium and its surrounding structures.     

Neurolin, a cell surface glycoprotein on growing retinal axons in the goldfish visual system, is reexpressed during retinal axonal regeneration.

The mAb E 21 recognizes a cell surface glycoprotein selectively associated with fish retinal ganglion cell axons that are in a state of growth. All retinal axons and ganglion cells in goldfish embryos stained for E 21. In adult fish, however, E 21 immunoreactivity exhibited a patterned distribution in ganglion cells in the marginal growth zone of the continuously enlarging fish retina and the new axons emerging from these cells in the retina, optic nerve, and optic tract. The E 21 antigen was absent from older axons, except the terminal arbor layer in the tectum, the Stratum fibrosum et griseum superficiale where it was uniformly distributed. Upon optic nerve transection, the previously unlabeled axons reacquired E 21 positivity as they regenerated throughout their path to the tectum. Several months after ONS, however, E 21 staining disappeared from the regenerated axons over most of their lengths but reappeared as in normal fish in the terminal arbor layer. The immunoaffinity-purified E 21 antigen, called Neurolin, has an apparent molecular mass of 86 kD and contains the HNK1/L2 carbohydrate moiety, like several members of the class of cell adhesion molecules of the Ig superfamily. The NH2-terminal amino acid sequence has homologies to the cell adhesion molecule DM-Grasp recently described in the chicken. Thus, retinal ganglion cell axons express Neurolin during their development and are able to reexpress this candidate cell adhesion molecule during axonal regeneration, suggesting that Neurolin is functionally important for fish retinal axon growth.     

Ephrin-B2 and EphB1 mediate retinal axon divergence at the optic chiasm

In animals with binocular vision, retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons either cross or avoid the midline at the optic chiasm. Here, we show that ephrin-Bs in the chiasm region direct the divergence of retinal axons through the selective repulsion of a subset of RGCs that express EphB1. Ephrin-B2 is expressed at the mouse chiasm midline as the ipsilateral projection is generated and is selectively inhibitory to axons from ventrotemporal (VT) retina, where ipsilaterally projecting RGCs reside. Moreover, blocking ephrin-B2 function in vitro rescues the inhibitory effect of chiasm cells and eliminates the ipsilateral projection in the semiintact mouse visual system. A receptor for ephrin-B2, EphB1, is found exclusively in regions of retina that give rise to the ipsilateral projection. EphB1 null mice exhibit a dramatically reduced ipsilateral projection, suggesting that this receptor contributes to the formation of the ipsilateral retinal projection, most likely through its repulsive interaction with ephrin-B2.     

Mutations affecting retinotectal axonal pathfinding in Medaka, Oryzias latipes

We screened for mutations affecting retinotectal axonal projection in Medaka, Oryzias latipes. In wild-type Medaka embryos, all the axons of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) project to the contralateral tectum, such that the topological relationship of the retinal field is maintained. We labeled RGC axons using DiI/DiO at the nasodorsal and temporoventral positions of the retina, and screened for mutations affecting the pattern of stereotypic projections to the tectum. By screening 184 mutagenized haploid genomes, seven mutations in five genes causing defects in axonal pathfinding were identified, whereas mutations affecting the topographic projection of RGC axons were not found. The mutants were grouped into two classes according to their phenotypes. In mutants of Class I, a subpopulation of the RGC axons branched out either immediately after leaving the eye or after reaching the midline, and this axonal subpopulation projected to the ipsilateral tectum. In mutants of Class II, subpopulations of RGC axons branched out after crossing the midline and projected aberrantly. These mutants will provide clues to understanding the functions of genes essential for axonal pathfinding, which may be conserved or partly divergent among vertebrates.     

Polarity and laminar formation of the optic tectum in relation to retinal projection

The mes-metencephalic boundary (isthmus) works as an organizer for the tectum, and the organizing molecule may be Fgf8. The region where Otx2, En1, and Pax2 are expressed overlappingly may differentiate into the mesencephalon. The di-mesencephalic and mes-metencephalic boundaries are determined by repressive interaction of Pax6 and En1/Pax2 and of Otx2 and Gbx2, respectively. The optic tectum is a visual center in lower vertebrates. The tectum and the retina should be regionalized and be positionally specialized for the proper retinotopic projection. Gradient of En2 plays a crucial role in rostrocaudal polarity formation of the tectum. En2 confers caudal characteristics of the retina by inducing ephrinA2 and A5, which are the repellant molecules for the growth cones of temporal retinal ganglion cells. Grg4 antagonizes the isthmus-related genes, and is involved in the formation of di-mesencephalic boundary and tectal polarity formation at an early phase of development. Then, Grg4 plays a role in tectal laminar formation by controlling the migration pathway. Migration pathway of tectal postmitotic cells changes after E5. The late migratory cells split the early migratory neurons to form laminae h-j of SGFS. Grg4 is expressed in the ventricular layer after E5, and forces postmitotic cells to follow the late migratory pathway, though retinal fibers terminate at laminae a-f of SGFS. Misexpression of Grg4 disrupts the lamina g, and in such tecta retinal arbors invade deep into the tectal layer, indicating that lamina g is a nonpermissive lamina for the retinal arbors.     

Two homeobox genes define the domain of EphA3 expression in the developing chick retina

Graded expression of the Eph receptor EphA3 in the retina and its two ligands, ephrin A2 and ephrin A5 in the optic tectum, the primary target of retinal axons, have been implicated in the formation of the retinotectal projection map. Two homeobox containing genes, SOHo1 and GH6, are expressed in a nasal-high, temporal-low pattern during early retinal development, and thus in opposing gradients to EphA3. Retroviral misexpression of SOHo1 or GH6 completely and specifically repressed EphA3 expression in the neural retina, but not in other parts of the central nervous system, such as the optic tectum. Under these conditions, some temporal ganglion cell axons overshot their expected termination zones in the rostral optic tectum, terminating aberrantly at more posterior locations. However, the majority of ganglion cell axons mapped to the appropriate rostrocaudal locations, although they formed somewhat more diffuse termination zones. These findings indicate that other mechanisms, in addition to differential EphA3 expression in the neural retina, are required for retinal ganglion axons to map to the appropriate rostrocaudal locations in the optic tectum. They further suggest that the control of topographic specificity along the retinal nasal-temporal axis is split into several independent pathways already at a very early time in development.     

The spatiotemporal distribution of N-CAM in the retinotectal pathway of adult goldfish detected by the monoclonal antibody D3

The spatiotemporal distribution of neural cell adhesion molecule (N-CAM) in the retinotectal system of adult goldfish was assessed by immunofluorescence using the monoclonal antibody (Mab) D3 against chick N-CAM. In immunoblots with extracts of cell surface membranes of fish brains, Mab D3 recognized a prominent band at 170K and a weak band at 130K (K = 10(3) Mr). N-CAM immunofluorescence on cells was restricted to the marginal growth zones of the retina and the tectum and, in normal fish, to the youngest axons from the new ganglion cells of the peripheral retinal margin. In fish with previously transected optic nerves (ONS), Mab D3 staining was found transiently on all axons from the site of the cut into the retinorecipient layers of the tectum, but disappeared from these axons 450 days after ONS. Growing retinal axons in vitro exhibited N-CAM immunofluorescence throughout their entire extent, including their growth cones. Glial cells cultured from regenerating optic nerves were, however, unlabeled. These data are consistent with the idea that N-CAM is involved in adhesive interactions of growing axons. The temporally regulated expression of N-CAM on the new retinal axons may contribute to the creation of the age-related organization of the axons in the retinotectal pathway of fish.     

Ipsilateral retinopetal projection of the nucleus olfactoretinalis (NOR) during development and regeneration: A dil study in a cichlid fish

The development and regeneration of the ipsilateral retinopetal projection of the nucleus olfactoretinalis (NOR) in the cichlid fish Haplochromis burtoni was studied with 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethyl indocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI) in fixed tissue. Through out development most NOR cells projected to the contralateral retina. Only an insignificant, transient elevation of a projection to the ipsilateral retinawas found in a few animals; however, after severing the contralateral processes of NOR cells by either enucleation or nerve crush, many animals had significantly more NOR cells with a regenerated process to the ipsilateral retina. Nevertheless, within a few weeks of surgery, the number of animals with ipsilaterally projecting cells were reduced to control values. The transiently enhanced ipsilateral projections to the retina imply changes in the guiding mechanism after these operations and the existence of control mechanisms against unusual connections to the retina in this bony fish. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.