Evolutionary genetics of vertebrate tissue mineralization: the origin and evolution of the secretory calcium-binding phosphoprotein family

Three principal mineralized tissues are present in teeth; a highly mineralized surface layer (enamel or enameloid), body dentin, and basal bone. Similar tissues have been identified in the dermal skeleton of Paleozoic jawless vertebrates, suggesting their ancient origin. These dental tissues form on protein matrix and their mineralization is controlled by distinctive proteins. We have shown that many secretory calcium-binding phosphoproteins (SCPPs) are involved in tetrapod tissue mineralization. These SCPPs all originated from the common ancestral gene SPARCL1 (secreted protein, acidic, cysteine-rich like 1) that initially arose from SPARC. The SCPP family also includes a bird eggshell matrix protein, mammalian milk casein, and salivary proteins. The eggshell SCPP plays crucial roles in rigid eggshell production, milk SCPPs in efficient lactation and in the evolution of complex dentition, and salivary SCPPs in maintaining tooth integrity. A comparative analysis of the mammalian, avian, and amphibian genomes revealed a tandem duplication history of the SCPP genes in tetrapods. Although these tetrapod SCPP genes are fewer in teleost genomes, independent parallel duplication has created distinct SCPP genes in this lineage. These teleost SCPPs are also used for enameloid and dentin mineralization, implying essential roles of SCPPs for dental tissue mineralization in osteichthyans. However, the SCPPs used for tetrapod enamel and teleost enameloid, as well as tetrapod dentin and teleost dentin, are all different. Thus, the evolution of vertebrate mineralized tissues seems to be explained by phenogenetic drift: while mineralized tissues are retained during vertebrate evolution, the underlying genetic basis has extensively drifted.     

Evolutionary Consequences of Skeletal Differentiation

Some aspects of the differentiation, growth, and morphogenesisof the tissues within the skeleton are discussed and relatedto the evolution of the vertebrate skeleton. The tissues consideredare bone, cartilage, dentine, and enamel. The histology of the skeletal tissues of the Ordovician agnathais reviewed with the conclusion that the skeletal tissues ofthe first vertebrates were as diverse and as specialized asare those of present-day vertebrates. Phylogenies of skeletaltissues cannot be established. The trend during evolution appearsto have been toward reduction in amount of skeletal tissue andin the number of types of tissues present. The factors which determine when and where a skeletal elementdevelops ontogenetically are reviewed and used to discuss theorigin and evolution of jaws, the evolution of membrane bonesand the origin of such structures as sesamoid bones. Specialimportance is attached to epithelial-mesenchymal interactions. The factors which determine what particular skeletal tissuewill form at a particular site within the body are reviewedwith especial reference to modulation, germ layer derivation,and the role of epigenetic factors. The factors which determine size and shape of the skeleton,both ontogenetically and phylogenetically, are reviewed andthe directive role of adjacent tissues emphasized.     

Histology and affinity of anaspids,and the early evolution of the vertebrate dermal skeleton

The assembly of the gnathostome bodyplan constitutes a formative episode in vertebrate evolutionary history, an interval in which the mineralized skeleton and its canonical suite of cell and tissue types originated. Fossil jawless fishes, assigned to the gnathostome stem-lineage, provide an unparalleled insight into the origin and evolution of the skeleton, hindered only by uncertainty over the phylogenetic position and evolutionary significance of key clades. Chief among these are the jawless anaspids, whose skeletal composition, a rich source of phylogenetic information, is poorly characterized. Here we survey the histology of representatives spanning anaspid diversity and infer their generalized skeletal architecture. The anaspid dermal skeleton is composed of odontodes comprising spheritic dentine and enameloid, overlying a basal layer of acellular parallel fibre bone containing an extensive shallow canal network. A recoded and revised phylogenetic analysis using equal and implied weights parsimony resolves anaspids as monophyletic, nested among stem-gnathostomes. Our results suggest the anaspid dermal skeleton is a degenerate derivative of a histologically more complex ancestral vertebrate skeleton, rather than reflecting primitive simplicity. Hypotheses that anaspids are ancestral skeletonizing lampreys, or a derived lineage of jawless vertebrates with paired fins, are rejected.     

DEVELOPMENT AND EVOLUTIONARY ORIGINS OF VERTEBRATE SKELETOGENIC AND ODONTOGENIC TISSUES

This review deals with the following seven aspects of vertebrate skeletogenic and odontogenic tissues.

• 1 The evolutionary sequence in which the tissues appeared amongst the lower craniate taxa.
• 2 The topographic association between skeletal (cartilage, bone) and dental (dentine, cement, enamel) tissues in the oldest vertebrates of each major taxon.
• 3 The separate developmental origin of the exo- and endoskeletons.
• 4 The neural-crest origin of cranial skeletogenic and odontogenic tissues in extant vertebrates.
• 5 The neural-crest origin of trunk dermal skeletogenic and odontogenic tissues in extant vertebrates.
• 6 The developmental processes that control differentiation of skeletogenic and odontogenic tissues in extant vertebrates.
• 7 Maintenance of developmental interactions regulating skeletogenic/odontogenic differentiation across vertebrate taxa. We derive twelve postulates, eight relating to the earliest vertebrate skeletogenic and odontogenic tissues and four relating to the development of these tissues in extant vertebrates and extrapolate the developmental data back to the evolutionary origin of vertebrate skeletogenic and odontogenic tissues. The conclusions that we draw from this analysis are as follows.
• 8 The dermal exoskeleton of thelodonts, heterostracans and osteostracans consisted of dentine, attachment tissue (cement or bone), and bone.
• 9 Cartilage (unmineralized) can be inferred to have been present in heterostracans and osteostracans, and globular mineralized cartilage was present in Eriptychius, an early Middle Ordovician vertebrate unassigned to any established group, but assumed to be a stem agnathan.
• 10 Enamel and possibly also enameloid was present in some early agnathans of uncertain affinities. The majority of dentine tubercles were bare.
• 11 The contemporaneous appearance of cellular and acellular bone in heterostracans and osteostracans during the Ordovician provides no clue as to whether one is more primitive than the other.
• 12 We interpret aspidin as being developmentally related to the odontogenic attachment tissues, either closer to dentine or a form of cement, rather than as derived from bone.
• 13 Dentine is present in the stratigraphically oldest (Cambrian) assumed vertebrate fossils, at present some only included as Problematica, and is cladistically primitive, relative to bone.
• 14 The first vertebrate exoskeletal skeletogenic ability was expressed as denticles of dentine.
• 15 Dentine, the bone of attachment associated with dentine, the basal bone to which dermal denticles are fused and cartilage of the Ordovician agnathan dermal exoskeleton were all derived from the neural crest and not from mesoderm. Therefore the earliest vertebrate skeletogenic/odontogenic tissues were of neural-crest origin.
• 16 Given the separate developmental and evolutionary origin of the cranial exo- and endoskeletons (both derivatives of the cranial neural crest) we conclude that bone (of attachment) was the primary skeletogenic tissue in the exoskeleton (cartilage being secondary), but that uncalcified cartilage was the primary skeletogenic tissue in the endoskeleton (bone – perichondral – being secondary).
• 17 Using evidence from developmental biology we conclude that the trunk neural crest of Ordovician agnathans was odontogenic, forming both dentine and bone of attachment of the trunk dermal exoskeleton.
• 18 Initiation of differentiation of skeletogenic and odontogenic tissues is controlled epigenetically by one or more epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in epigenetic cascades.
• 19 Changes in timing of steps in these epigenetic cascades provides an evolutionary mechanism for altering the types of skeletogenic/odontogenic tissues and/or structures formed.
• 20 The appearance of epithelial-mesenchymal interactions and the origin of the skeletogenic/odontogenic neural crest at the outset of vertebrate evolution provided the developmental basis for the evolutionary origin of vertebrate skeletogenic and odontogenic tissues and for the appearance and evolution of the vertebrate skeleton.

     

Conodont affinity and chordate phylogeny

Current information on the conodonts Clydagnathus windsorensis (Globensky) and Promissum pulchrum Kovács‐ Endrödy, together with the latest interpretations of conodont hard tissues, are reviewed and it is concluded that sufficient evidence exists to justify interpretation of the conodonts on a chordate model. A new phylogenetic analysis is undertaken, consisting of 17 chordate taxa and 103 morphological, physiological and biochemical characters; conodonts are included as a primary taxon. Various experiments with character coding, taxon deletion and the use of constraint trees are carried out. We conclude that conodonts are cladistically more derived than either hagfishes or lampreys because they possess a mineralised dermal skeleton and that they are the most plesiomorphic member of the total group Gnathostomata. We discuss the evolution of the nervous and sensory systems and the skeleton in the context of our optimal phylogenetic tree. There appears to be no simple evolution of free to canal‐enclosed neuromasts; organised neuromasts within canals appear to have arisen at least three times from free neuromasts or neuromasts arranged within grooves. The mineralised vertebrate skeleton first appeared as odontodes of dentine or dentine plus enamel in the paraconodont/euconodont feeding apparatus. Bone appeared later, co‐ordinate with the development of a dermal skeleton, and it appears to have been primitively acellular. Atubular dentine is more primitive than tubular dentine. However, the subsequent distribution of the different types of dentine (e.g. mesodentine, orthodentine), suggests that these tissue types are homoplastic. The topology of relationships and known stratigraphic ranges of taxa in our phylogeny predict the existence of myxinoids and petromyzontids in the Cambrian.     

Formation of dermal skeletal and dental tissues in fish: a comparative and evolutionary approach

Osteichthyan and chondrichthyan fish present an astonishing diversity of skeletal and dental tissues that are often difficult to classify into the standard textbook categories of bone, cartilage, dentine and enamel. To address the question of how the tissues of the dermal skeleton evolved from the ancestral situation and gave rise to the diversity actually encountered, we review previous data on the development of a number of dermal skeletal elements (odontodes, teeth and dermal denticles, cranial dermal bones, postcranial dermal plates and scutes, elasmoid and ganoid scales, and fin rays). A comparison of developmental stages at the tissue level usually allows us to identify skeletogenic cell populations as either odontogenic or osteogenic on the basis of the place of formation of their dermal papillae and of the way of deposition of their tissues. Our studies support the evolutionary affinities (1) between odontodes, teeth and denticles, (2) between the ganoid scales of polypterids and the elasmoid scales of teleosts, and (3) to a lesser degree between the different bony elements. There is now ample evidence to ascertain that the tissues of the elasmoid scale are derived from dental and not from bony tissues. This review demonstrates the advantage that can be taken from developmental studies, at the tissue level, to infer evolutionary relationships within the dermal skeleton in chondrichthyans and osteichthyans.     

The SCPP gene repertoire in bony vertebrates and graded differences in mineralized tissues

The vertebrate tooth is covered with enamel in most sarcopterygians or enameloid in chondrichthyans and actinopterygians. The evolutionary relationship among these two tissues, the hardest tissue in the body, and other mineralized tissues has long been controversial. We have recently reported that specific combinations of secretory calcium-binding phosphoprotein (SCPP) genes are involved in the mineralization of bone, dentin, enameloid, and enamel. Thus, the early repertoire of SCPP genes would elucidate the evolutionary relationship across these tissues. However, the diversity of SCPP genes in teleosts and tetrapods and the roles of these genes in distinct tissues have remained unclear, mainly because many SCPP genes are lineage-specific. In this study, I show that the repertoire of SCPP genes in the zebrafish, frog, and humans includes many lineage-specific genes and some widely conserved genes that originated in stem osteichthyans or earlier. Expression analysis demonstrates that some frog and zebrafish SCPP genes are used primarily in bone, but also in dentin, while the reverse is true of other genes, similar to some mammalian SCPP genes. Dentin and enameloid initially use shared genes in the matrix, but enameloid is subsequently hypermineralized. Notably, enameloid and enamel use an orthologous SCPP gene in the hypermineralization process. Thus, the hypermineralization machinery ancestral to both enameloid and enamel arose before the actinopterygian–sarcopterygian divergence. However, enamel employs specialized SCPPs as structuring proteins, not used in enameloid, reflecting the divergence of enamel from enameloid. These results show graded differences in mineralized dental tissues and reinforce the hypothesis that bone–dentin–enameloid–enamel constitutes an evolutionary continuum. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Ontogenetic development of an exceptionally preserved Devonian cartilaginous skeleton

Cartilaginous vertebrate skeletons leave few records as fossils, unless mineralized. Here, we report outstanding preservation of early stages of cartilage differentiation, present in the Devonian vertebrate Palaeospondylus gunni. In large specimens of Palaeospondylus, enlarged, hypertrophic cell spaces (lacunae) are dominant in the cartilage matrix, each defined by thin mineralized matrix, where phosphorus and calcium co-occur. This is comparable to living endochondral cartilage, where cell hypertrophy and matrix mineralization mark the end of an ontogenetic process of cell growth and division before bone formation. New information from small individuals of Palaeospondylus demonstrates that the skeleton comprises mostly unmineralized organic matrix with fewer hypertrophic cell spaces, these occurring only in the central regions of each element. Only here has the surrounding matrix begun to mineralize, differing from the larger specimens in that phosphorus is dominant with little associated calcium at these earlier stages. This reflects cellular control of mineralization in living tissues through phosphate accumulation around hypertrophic cells, with later increase in calcium in the cartilaginous matrix. These features are always associated with endochondral bone development, but in the Palaeospondylus skeleton, this bone never develops. This skeletal state is thus far unique among vertebrates, with two alternative explanations: either later stages of endochondral bone development have been lost in Palaeospondylus, or, in a stepwise acquisition of the mineralized skeleton, these late stages have not yet evolved.     

Histology of the heterostracan dermal skeleton: Insight into the origin of the vertebrate mineralised skeleton

Living vertebrates are divided into those that possess a fully formed and fully mineralised skeleton (gnathostomes) versus those that possess only unmineralised cartilaginous rudiments (cyclostomes). As such, extinct phylogenetic intermediates of these living lineages afford unique insights into the evolutionary assembly of the vertebrate mineralised skeleton and its canonical tissue types. Extinct jawless and jawed fishes assigned to the gnathostome stem evidence the piecemeal assembly of skeletal systems, revealing that the dermal skeleton is the earliest manifestation of a homologous mineralised skeleton. Yet the nature of the primitive dermal skeleton, itself, is poorly understood. This is principally because previous histological studies of early vertebrates lacked a phylogenetic framework required to derive evolutionary hypotheses. Nowhere is this more apparent than within Heterostraci, a diverse clade of primitive jawless vertebrates. To this end, we surveyed the dermal skeletal histology of heterostracans, inferred the plesiomorphic heterostracan skeleton and, through histological comparison to other skeletonising vertebrate clades, deduced the ancestral nature of the vertebrate dermal skeleton. Heterostracans primitively possess a four‐layered skeleton, comprising a superficial layer of odontodes composed of dentine and enameloid; a compact layer of acellular parallel‐fibred bone containing a network of vascular canals that supply the pulp canals (L1); a trabecular layer consisting of intersecting radial walls composed of acellular parallel‐fibred bone, showing osteon‐like development (L2); and a basal layer of isopedin (L3). A three layered skeleton, equivalent to the superficial layer L2 and L3 and composed of enameloid, dentine and acellular bone, is possessed by the ancestor of heterostracans + jawed vertebrates. We conclude that an osteogenic component is plesiomorphic with respect to the vertebrate dermal skeleton. Consequently, we interpret the dermal skeleton of denticles in chondrichthyans and jawless thelodonts as independently and secondarily simplified. J. Morphol. 276:657–680, 2015. © 2015 The Authors Journal of Morphology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Microstructural variation in conodont enamel is a functional adaptation

Recognition that conodonts were the earliest vertebrate group to experiment with skeletal biomineralization provides a window in which to study the origin and early evolution of this developmental system. It has been contended that the conodont skeleton comprised a classic suite of vertebrate hard tissues, while others suggest that conodont hard tissues represent divergent specializations within the early diversification of vertebrate hard tissues, supporting a view that the hard tissues of conodonts, particularly enamel, exhibit a range of microstructural variation beyond that seen in vertebrates. New evidence reveals that, although variable, conodont enamel microstructure is consistent between homologous portions of homologous dentitions. Although there is a correlation between morphology and microstructure, this belies a stronger correlation between the commonality of microstructure and dental function. The enamel of conodonts evolved in response to changes in dental function and differentiation of the microstructural layer into a number of enamel types and can be linked to dental occlusion, heterodonty, a permanent dentition, enamel thickness and, probably above all, the small size of the dental elements.     

Regeneration of amphioxus oral cirri and its skeletal rods: implications for the origin of the vertebrate skeleton

The oral cirri of amphioxus function as the first filter during feeding by eliminating unwanted large or noxious particulates. In this study, we were able to regenerate cirri following artificial amputation. This is the first firm observation of regeneration in amphioxus. Using this regeneration system, we studied skeletogenesis of the cellular skeleton of amphioxus oral cirri. During regeneration, the skeletal cells showed expression of fibrillar collagen and SoxE genes. These observations suggest that an evolutionarily conserved genetic regulatory system is involved in amphioxus cirrus and vertebrate cartilage skeletogenesis. In addition, Runx and SPARC/osteonectin expression were observed in regenerating cirral skeletal cells, indicating that cirral skeletogenesis is similar to vertebrate osteogenesis. We propose that the common ancestors of chordates possessed a genetic regulatory system that was the prototype of chondrogenesis and osteogenesis in vertebrates. Genome duplications caused divergence of this genetic regulatory system resulting in the emergence of cartilage and mineralized bone. The development of the vertebrate skeleton is an example of the functional segregation and subsequent recruitment of unique genetic materials that may account for the evolutionary diversification of novel cell types.     

Testing models of dental development in the earliest bony vertebrates, Andreolepis and Lophosteus

Theories on the development and evolution of teeth have long been biased by the fallacy that chondrichthyans reflect the ancestral condition for jawed vertebrates. However, correctly resolving the nature of the primitive vertebrate dentition is challenged by a dearth of evidence on dental development in primitive osteichthyans. Jaw elements from the Silurian-Devonian stem-osteichthyans Lophosteus and Andreolepis have been described to bear a dentition arranged in longitudinal rows and vertical files, reminiscent of a pattern of successional development. We tested this inference, using synchrotron radiation X-ray tomographic microscopy (SRXTM) to reveal the pattern of skeletal development preserved in the sclerochronology of the mineralized tissues. The tooth-like tubercles represent focal elaborations of dentine within otherwise continuous sheets of the dermal skeleton, present in at least three stacked generations. Thus, the tubercles are not discrete modular teeth and their arrangement into rows and files is a feature of the dermal ornamentation that does not reflect a polarity of development or linear succession. These fossil remains have no bearing on the nature of the dentition in osteichthyans and, indeed, our results raise questions concerning the homologies of these bones and the phylogenetic classification of Andreolepis and Lophosteus.     

A dynamic history of gene duplications and losses characterizes the evolution of the SPARC family in eumetazoans

The vertebrates share the ability to produce a skeleton made of mineralized extracellular matrix. However, our understanding of the molecular changes that accompanied their emergence remains scarce. Here, we describe the evolutionary history of the SPARC (secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine) family, because its vertebrate orthologues are expressed in cartilage, bones and teeth where they have been proposed to bind calcium and act as extracellular collagen chaperones, and because further duplications of specific SPARC members produced the small calcium-binding phosphoproteins (SCPP) family that is crucial for skeletal mineralization to occur. Both phylogeny and synteny conservation analyses reveal that, in the eumetazoan ancestor, a unique ancestral gene duplicated to give rise to SPARC and SPARCB described here for the first time. Independent losses have eliminated one of the two paralogues in cnidarians, protostomes and tetrapods. Hence, only non-tetrapod deuterostomes have conserved both genes. Remarkably, SPARC and SPARCB paralogues are still linked in the amphioxus genome. To shed light on the evolution of the SPARC family members in chordates, we performed a comprehensive analysis of their embryonic expression patterns in amphioxus, tunicates, teleosts, amphibians and mammals. Our results show that in the chordate lineage SPARC and SPARCB family members were recurrently recruited in a variety of unrelated tissues expressing collagen genes. We propose that one of the earliest steps of skeletal evolution involved the co-expression of SPARC paralogues with collagenous proteins.     

Finite element,occlusal, microwear and microstructural analyses indicate that conodont microstructure is adapted to dental function

Conodonts constitute the earliest evidence of skeletal biomineralization in the vertebrate evolutionary lineage, manifest as a feeding apparatus of tooth‐like elements comprised of enamel‐ and dentine‐like tissues that evolved in parallel with these canonical tissues in other total‐group gnathostomes. As such, this remarkable example of evolutionary parallelism affords a natural experiment in which to explore the constraints on vertebrate skeletal evolution. Using finite element analysis, informed by occlusal and microwear analyses, we tested the hypothesis that coincidence of complex dental function and microstructural differentiation in the enamel‐like tissues of conodonts and other vertebrates is a consequence of functional adaptation. Our results show topological co‐variation in the patterns of stress distribution and crystallite orientation. In regions of high stress, such as the apex of the basal cavity and inner parts of the platform, the crown tissue comprises interwoven prisms, discontinuities between which would have acted to decussate cracks, preventing propagation. These results inform a general occlusal model for platform conodont elements and demonstrate that the complex microstructure of conodont crown tissue is an adaptation to the dental functions that the elements performed.     

Consideration of the neural crest and its skeletal derivatives in the context of novelty/innovation

I examine the neural crest and skeletal tissues derived from neural crest cells in the context of novelty/innovation by asking whether the neural crest is a novel tissue and whether the evolutionary origin of the neural crest required innovative developmental processes. As a vertebrate autapomorphy, the neural crest is a novel structure. I equate novelty with innovation and take a hierarchical approach. Some other workers separate the two, using novelty for new structures not found in an ancestor and not homologous with a feature in an ancestor, and innovation for the new processes required to generate the novel structure. While development clearly evolves, I do not separate those processes that result in the production of novel features from those that lead to change in existing structures, whether that change is a transition or transformation from one homologous feature to another (fins-->tetrapod limbs or locomotory appendages-->crustacean maxilliped feeding appendages). The existence of novelties causes us to consider the concept of latent homology. Neural crest cells form cartilage, dentine and bone. Cartilage is found in invertebrates and so is not a vertebrate innovation. No invertebrate cartilage mineralizes in vivo, although some can be induced to mineralize in vitro. Mineralization of cartilage in vivo is a vertebrate innovation. Dentine is a novel tissue that only forms from neural crest cells. Bone is a vertebrate innovation but not one exclusive to the neural crest. The developmental processes responsible for the neural crest and for these skeletal tissues did not arise de novo with the vertebrates. Novelty/innovation results from tinkering with existing processes, from the flexibility that arises from modifications of existing gene networks, and from the selective advantage provided by gene duplications or modifications.     

BASAL TISSUE STRUCTURE IN THE EARLIEST EUCONODONTS: TESTING HYPOTHESES OF DEVELOPMENTAL PLASTICITY IN EUCONODONT PHYLOGENY

Abstract:  The hypothesis that conodonts are vertebrates rests solely on evidence of soft tissue anatomy. This has been corroborated by microstructural, topological and developmental evidence of homology between conodont and vertebrate hard tissues. However, these conclusions have been reached on the basis of evidence from highly derived euconodont taxa and the degree to which they are representative of plesiomorphic euconodonts remains an open question. Furthermore, the range of variation in tissue types comprising the euconodont basal body has been used to establish a hypothesis of developmental plasticity early in the phylogeny of the clade, and a model of diminishing potentiality in the evolution of development systems. The microstructural fabrics of the basal tissues of the earliest euconodonts (presumed to be the most plesiomorphic) are examined to test these two hypotheses. It is found that the range of microstructural variation observed hitherto was already apparent among plesiomorphic euconodonts. Thus, established histological data are representative of the most plesiomorphic euconodonts. However, although there is evidence of a range in microstructural fabrics, these are compatible with the dentine tissue system alone, and the degree of variation is compatible with that seen in clades of comparable diversity.     

Charles Darwin,embryology, evolution and skeletal plasticity

Darwin provided us with the theory of evolutionary change through natural selection. Just as important to the science of biology was Darwin’s recognition that all organisms could be classified and were related to one another because they arose from a single common universal ancestor – what we know as the universal tree of life (UtoL). All the features of the skeletal biology of fish therefore can be explained, both in an evolutionary framework (ultimate causation) and in the framework of development, growth and physiology (proximate causation). Neither approach is complete without the other. I will outline the elements of Darwin’s theories on evolution and classification and, as importantly, discuss what was missing from Darwin’s theories. An important class of evidence for evolution used by Darwin came from embryology, both comparative embryology and the existence of vestiges and atavisms. After discussing this evidence I examine some fundamental features of skeletal development and evolution These include: the presence of four skeletal systems in all vertebrates; the existence of two skeletons, one based on cartilage, the other on bone and dentine; the modular nature of skeletal development and evolution; and the plasticity of the skeleton in response to either genetic or environmental changes.