In silico comparison of photons versus carbon ions in single fraction therapy of lung cancer

PurposeStereotactic body image guided radiation therapy (SBRT) shows good results for lung cancer treatment. Better normal tissue sparing might be achieved with scanned carbon ion therapy (PT). Therefore an in silico trial was conducted to find potential advantages of and patients suited for PT.MethodsFor 19 patients treated with SBRT, PT plans were calculated on 4D-CTs with simulated breathing motion. Prescribed single fraction dose was 24 Gy and OAR constraints used for photon planning were respected. Motion was mitigated by rescanning and range-adapted ITVs. Doses were compared to the original SBRT plans.ResultsCTV coverage was the same in SBRT and PT. The field-specific PTV including range margins for PT was 1.5 (median, 25–75% 1.3–2.1) times larger than for SBRT. Nevertheless, maximum point dose and mean dose in OARs were higher in SBRT by 2.8 (1.6–3.7) Gy and 0.7 (0.3–1.6) Gy, respectively. Patients with a CTV >2.5 cc or with multiple lung lesions showed larger differences in OAR doses in favor of PT.ConclusionsPatients receive less dose in critical OARs such as heart, spinal cord, esophagus, trachea and aorta with PT, while maintaining the same target coverage. Patients with multiple or larger lesions are particularly suited for PT.     

Dosimetric effect of intrafraction motion and different localization strategies in prostate SBRT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric effect of continuous motion monitoring based localization (Calypso, Varian Medical Systems), gating and intrafraction motion correction in prostate SBRT. Delivered doses were modelled by reconstructing motion inclusive dose distributions for different localization strategies. Actually delivered dose (strategy A) utilized initial Calypso localization, CBCT and additional pre-treatment motion correction by kV-imaging and Calypso, and gating during the irradiation. The effect of gating was investigated by simulating non-gated treatments (strategy B). Additionally, non-gated and single image-guided (CBCT) localization was simulated (strategy C). A total of 308 fractions from 22 patients were reconstructed. The dosimetric effect was evaluated by comparing motion inclusive target and risk organ dose-volume parameters to planned values. Motion induced dose deficits were seen mainly in PTV and CTV to PTV margin regions, whereas CTV dose deficits were small in all strategies: mean ± SD difference in CTVD99% was –0.3 ± 0.4%, −0.4 ± 0.6% and –0.7 ± 1.2% in strategies A, B and C, respectively. Largest dose deficits were seen in individual fractions for strategy C (maximum dose reductions were −29.0% and –7.1% for PTVD95% and CTVD99%, respectively). The benefit of gating was minor, if additional motion correction was applied immediately prior to irradiation. Continuous motion monitoring based localization and motion correction ensured the target coverage and minimized the OAR exposure for every fraction and is recommended to use in prostate SBRT. The study is part of clinical trial NCT02319239.     

Proton or photon radiosurgery for cardiac ablation of ventricular tachycardia? Breath and ECG gated robust optimization

PurposeVentricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening heart disorder. The aim of this preliminary study is to assess the feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) photon and proton therapy (PT) plans for the treatment of VT, adopting robust optimization technique for both irradiation techniques.MethodsECG gated CT images (in breath hold) were acquired for one patient. Conventional planning target volume (PTV) and robust optimized plans (25GyE in single fraction) were simulated for both photon (IMRT, 5 and 9 beams) and proton (SFO, 2 beams) plans. Robust optimized plans were obtained both for protons and photons considering in the optimization setup errors (5 mm in the three orthogonal directions), range (±3.5%) and the clinical target volume (CTV) motion due to heartbeat and breath-hold variability.ResultsThe photon robust optimization method, compared to PTV-based plans, showed a reduction in the average dose to the heart by about 25%; robust optimization allowed also reducing the mean dose to the left lung from 3.4. to 2.8 Gy for 9-beams configuration and from 4.1 to 2.9 Gy for 5-beams configuration. Robust optimization with protons, allowed further reducing the OAR doses: average dose to the heart and to the left lung decreased from 7.3 Gy to 5.2 GyE and from 2.9 Gy to 2.2 GyE, respectively.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates the importance of the optimization technique adopted in the treatment planning system for VT treatment. It has been shown that robust optimization can significantly reduce the dose to healthy cardiac tissues and that PT further increases this gain.     

Local control rates in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of lung metastases associated with the biologically effective dose

AimTo evaluate dose differences in lung metastases treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and the correlation with local control, regarding the dose algorithm, target volume and tissue density.BackgroundSeveral studies showed excellent local control rates in SBRT for lung metastases, with different fractionation schemes depending on the tumour location or size. These results depend on the dose distributions received by the lesions in terms of the tissue heterogeneity corrections performed by the dose algorithms.Materials and methodsForty-seven lung metastases treated with SBRT, using intrafraction control and respiratory gating with internal fiducial markers as surrogates (ExacTrac, BrainLAB AG), were calculated using Pencil Beam (PB) and Monte Carlo (MC) (iPlan, BrainLAB AG).Dose differences between both algorithms were obtained for the dose received by 99% (D_99%) and 50% (D_50%) of the planning treatment volume (PTV). The biologically effective dose delivered to 99% (BED_99%) and 50% (BED_50%) of the PTV were estimated from the MC results. Local control was evaluated after 24 months of median follow-up (range: 3–52 months).ResultsThe greatest variations (40.0% in ΔD_99% and 38.4% in ΔD_50%) were found for the lower volume and density cases. The BED_99% and BED_50% were strongly correlated with observed local control rates: 100% and 61.5% for BED_99% > 85 Gy and <85 Gy (p < 0.0001), respectively, and 100% and 58.3% for BED_50% > 100 Gy and <100 Gy (p < 0.0001), respectively.ConclusionsLung metastases treated with SBRT, with delivered BED_99% > 85 Gy and BED_50% > 100 Gy, present better local control rates than those treated with lower BED values (p = 0.001).     

Intermediate Megavoltage Photon Beams for Improved Lung Cancer Treatments

The goal of this study is to evaluate the effects of intermediate megavoltage (3-MV) photon beams on SBRT lung cancer treatments. To start with, a 3-MV virtual beam was commissioned on a commercial treatment planning system based on Monte Carlo simulations. Three optimized plans (6-MV, 3-MV and dual energy of 3- and 6-MV) were generated for 31 lung cancer patients with identical beam configuration and optimization constraints for each patient. Dosimetric metrics were evaluated and compared among the three plans. Overall, planned dose conformity was comparable among three plans for all 31 patients. For 21 thin patients with average short effective path length (< 10 cm), the 3-MV plans showed better target coverage and homogeneity with dose spillage index R_50% = 4.68±0.83 and homogeneity index = 1.26±0.06, as compared to 4.95±1.01 and 1.31±0.08 in the 6-MV plans (p < 0.001). Correspondingly, the average/maximum reductions of lung volumes receiving 20 Gy (V_20Gy), 5 Gy (V_5Gy), and mean lung dose (MLD) were 7%/20%, 9%/30% and 5%/10%, respectively in the 3-MV plans (p < 0.05). The doses to 5% volumes of the cord, esophagus, trachea and heart were reduced by 9.0%, 10.6%, 11.4% and 7.4%, respectively (p < 0.05). For 10 thick patients, dual energy plans can bring dosimetric benefits with comparable target coverage, integral dose and reduced dose to the critical structures, as compared to the 6-MV plans. In conclusion, our study indicated that 3-MV photon beams have potential dosimetric benefits in treating lung tumors in terms of improved tumor coverage and reduced doses to the adjacent critical structures, in comparison to 6-MV photon beams. Intermediate megavoltage photon beams (< 6-MV) may be considered and added into current treatment approaches to reduce the adjacent normal tissue doses while maintaining sufficient tumor dose coverage in lung cancer radiotherapy.     

Advanced dose calculation algorithms in lung cancer radiotherapy: Implications for SBRT and locally advanced disease in deep inspiration breath hold

PurposeEvaluating performance of modern dose calculation algorithms in SBRT and locally advanced lung cancer radiotherapy in free breathing (FB) and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH).MethodsFor 17 patients with early stage and 17 with locally advanced lung cancer, a plan in FB and in DIBH were generated with Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA). Plans for early stage were 3D-conformal SBRT, 45 Gy in 3 fractions, prescribed to 95% isodose covering 95% of PTV and aiming for 140% dose centrally in the tumour. Locally advanced plans were volumetric modulated arc therapy, 66 Gy in 33 fractions, prescribed to mean PTV dose. Calculation grid size was 1 mm for SBRT and 2.5 mm for locally advanced plans. All plans were recalculated with AcurosXB with same MU as in AAA, for comparison on target coverage and dose to risk organs.ResultsLung volume increased in DIBH, resulting in decreased lung density (6% for early and 13% for locally-advanced group).In SBRT, AAA overestimated mean and near-minimum PTV dose (p-values < 0.01) compared to AcurosXB, with largest impact in DIBH (differences of up to 11 Gy). These clinically relevant differences may be a combination of small targets and large dose gradients within the PTV.In locally advanced group, AAA overestimated mean GTV, CTV and PTV doses by median less than 0.8 Gy and near-minimum doses by median 0.4–2.7 Gy.No clinically meaningful difference was observed for lung and heart dose metrics between the algorithms, for both FB and DIBH.ConclusionsAAA overestimated target coverage compared to AcurosXB, especially in DIBH for SBRT.     

Potential interest of developing an integrated boost dose escalation for stereotactic irradiation of primary prostate cancer

IntroductionThe stereotactic irradiation is a new approach for low-risk prostate cancer. The aim of the present study was to evaluate a schema of stereotactic irradiation of the prostate with an integrated-boost into the tumor.Material and methodsThe prostate and the tumor were delineated by a radiologist on CT/MRI fusion. A 9-coplanar fields IMRT plan was optimized with three different dose levels: 1) 5 × 6.5 Gy to the PTV1 (plan 1), 2) 5 × 8 Gy to the PTV1 (plan 2) and 3) 5 × 6.5 Gy on the PTV1 with 5 × 8 Gy on the PTV2 (plan 3). The maximum dose (MaxD), mean dose (MD) and doses received by 2% (D2), 5% (D5), 10% (D10) and 25% (D25) of the rectum and bladder walls were used to compare the 3 IMRT plans.ResultsA dose escalation to entire prostate from 6.5 Gy to 8 Gy increased the rectum MD, MaxD, D2, D5, D10 and D25 by 3.75 Gy, 8.42 Gy, 7.88 Gy, 7.36 Gy, 6.67 Gy and 5.54 Gy. Similar results were observed for the bladder with 1.72 Gy, 8.28 Gy, 7.01 Gy, 5.69 Gy, 4.36 Gy and 2.42 Gy for the same dosimetric parameters. An integrated SBRT boost only to PTV2 reduced by about 50% the dose difference for rectum and bladder compared to a homogenous prostate dose escalation. Thereby, the MD, D2, D5, D10 and D25 for rectum were increased by 1.51 Gy, 4.24 Gy, 3.08 Gy, 2.84 Gy and 2.37 Gy in plan 3 compared to plan 1.ConclusionsThe present planning study of an integrated SBRT boost limits the doses received by the rectum and bladder if compared to a whole prostate dose escalation for SBRT approach.     

Evaluation of the target dose coverage of stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer using helical tomotherapy: A dynamic phantom study

AimTo evaluate the target dose coverage for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using helical tomotherapy (HT) with the internal tumor volume (ITV) margin settings adjusted according to the degree of tumor motion.BackgroundLung SBRT with HT may cause a dosimetric error when the target motion is large.Materials and methodsTwo lung SBRT plans were created using a tomotherapy planning station. Using these original plans, five plans with different ITV margins (4.0–20.0 mm for superior-inferior [SI] dimension) were generated. To evaluate the effects of respiratory motion on HT, an original dynamic motion phantom was developed. The respiratory wave of a healthy volunteer was used for dynamic motion as the typical tumor respiratory motion. Five patterns of motion amplitude that corresponded to five ITV margin sizes and three breathing cycles of 7, 14, and 28 breaths per minute were used. We evaluated the target dose change between a static delivery and a dynamic delivery with each motion pattern.ResultsThe target dose difference increased as the tumor size decreased and as the tumor motion increased. Although a target dose difference of <5 % was observed at ≤10 mm of tumor motion for each condition, a maximum difference of -9.94 % ± 7.10 % was observed in cases of small tumors with 20 mm of tumor motion under slow respiration.ConclusionsMinimizing respiratory movement is recommended as much as possible for lung SBRT with HT, especially for cases involving small tumors.     

Usefulness of a new online patient-specific quality assurance system for respiratory-gated radiotherapy

PurposeThe accuracy of gated irradiation may decrease when treatment is performed with short “beam-on” times. Also, the dose is subject to variation between treatment sessions if the respiratory rate is irregular. We therefore evaluated the impact of the differences between gated and non-gated treatment on doses using a new online quality assurance (QA) system for respiratory-gated radiotherapy.MethodsWe generated dose estimation models to associate dose and pulse information using a 0.6 cc Farmer chamber and our QA system. During gated irradiation with each of seven regular and irregular respiratory patterns, with the Farmer chamber readings as references, we evaluated our QA system’s accuracy. We then used the QA system to assess the impact of respiratory patterns on dose distribution for three lung and three liver radiotherapy plans. Gated and non-gated plans were generated and compared.ResultsThere was agreement within 1.7% between the ionization chamber and our system for several regular and irregular motion patterns. For dose distributions with measured errors, there were larger differences between gated and non-gated treatment for high-dose regions within the planned treatment volume (PTV). Compared with a non-gated plan, PTV D_95% for a gated plan decreased by −1.5% to −2.6%. Doses to organs at risk were similar with both plans.ConclusionsOur simple system estimated the radiation dose to the patient using only pulse information from the linac, even during irregular respiration. The quality of gated irradiation for each patient can be verified fraction by fraction.     

Tracking,gating, free-breathing,which technique to use for lung stereotactic treatments? A dosimetric comparison

BackgroundThe management of breath-induced tumor motion is a major challenge for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Three techniques are currently available for these treatments: tracking (T), gating (G) and free-breathing (FB).AimTo evaluate the dosimetric differences between these three treatment techniques for lung SBRT.Materials and methodsPretreatment 4DCT data were acquired for 10 patients and sorted into 10 phases of a breathing cycle, such as 0% and 50% phases defined respectively as the inhalation and exhalation maximum. GTV_ph, PTV_ph (=GTV_ph + 3 mm) and the ipsilateral lung were contoured on each phase.For the tracking technique, 9 fixed fields were adjusted to each PTV_ph for the 10 phases. The gating technique was studied with 3 exhalation phases (40%, 50% and 60%). For the free-breathing technique, ITV_FB was created from a sum of all GTV_ph and a 3 mm margin was added to define a PTV_FB. Fields were adjusted to PTV_FB and dose distributions were calculated on the average intensity projection (AIP) CT. Then, the beam arrangement with the same monitor units was planned on each CT phase.The 3 modalities were evaluated using DVHs of each GTV_ph, the homogeneity index and the volume of the ipsilateral lung receiving 20 Gy (V_20Gy).ResultsThe FB system improved the target coverage by increasing D_mean (75.87_(T)–76.08_(G)–77.49_(FB)Gy). Target coverage was slightly more homogeneous, too (HI: 0.17_{(T and G)}–0.15_(FB)). But the lung was better protected with the tracking system (V_20Gy: 3.82_(T)–4.96_(G)–6.34_(FB)%).ConclusionsEvery technique provides plans with a good target coverage and lung protection. While irradiation with free-breathing increases doses to GTV, irradiation with the tracking technique spares better the lung but can dramatically increase the treatment complexity.     

First report of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy

IntroductionPulmonary large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a very rare disease, comprising approximately 3% of lung cancers. Even for Stage I disease, recurrence after resection is common, with a poor five-year overall survival. We present the first report of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pulmonary LCNEC.MethodsA 54-year-old woman with a left upper lobe pulmonary nodule underwent a wedge resection with thoracoscopic mediastinal lymph node dissection, revealing a 2.3 cm pT1b N0 LCNEC. Approximately one year later, surveillance imaging demonstrated a new left upper lobe PET-avid nodule, resulting in completion left upper lobectomy revealing LCNEC, with 0/6 involved lymph nodes and negative staging studies. The patient subsequently chose surveillance over adjuvant chemotherapy; unfortunately 23 months later imaging revealed an enlarging 0.7 cm nodule adjacent to the previous resection site, despite the patient remaining in good health (KPS = 90). Subsequent restaging demonstrated no evidence of metastatic disease. Due to the morbidity of a third operation in this region, and based on the safety of SBRT for Stage I non small-cell lung cancer, the consensus decision from our thoracic oncology team was to proceed with SBRT as preferred management for presumptive second recurrence of LCNEC. The patient shortly thereafter underwent SBRT (50 Gy in 10 Gy/fraction) to this new nodule, 41 months following initial LCNEC diagnosis.ResultsFour months following SBRT, the patient remains in excellent clinical condition (KPS 90), with no evidence of disease spread on surveillance studies. The nodule itself demonstrated no evidence of growth following SBRT.ConclusionsThis first report of SBRT for pulmonary LCNEC demonstrates that SBRT is a feasible modality for this rare disease. A multidisciplinary thoracic oncology approach involving medical oncology, thoracic surgery, radiation oncology and pulmonology is strongly recommended to ensure proper patient selection for receipt of SBRT.     

Use of a second-dose calculation algorithm to check dosimetric parameters for the dose distribution of a first-dose calculation algorithm for lung SBRT plans

PurposeTo verify lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plans using a secondary treatment planning system (TPS) as an independent method of verification and to define tolerance levels (TLs) in lung SBRT between the primary and secondary TPSs.MethodsA total of 147 lung SBRT plans calculated using X-ray voxel Monte Carlo (XVMC) were exported from iPlan to Eclipse in DICOM format. Dose distributions were recalculated using the Acuros XB (AXB) and the anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA), while maintaining monitor units (MUs) and the beam arrangement. Dose to isocenter and dose-volumetric parameters, such as D₂, D₅₀, D₉₅ and D₉₈, were evaluated for each patient. The TLs of all parameters between XVMC and AXB (TL_AXB) and between XVMC and AAA (TL_AAA) were calculated as the mean ± 1.96 standard deviations.ResultsAXB values agreed with XVMC values within 3.5% for all dosimetric parameters in all patients. By contrast, AAA sometimes calculated a 10% higher dose in PTV D₉₅ and D₉₈ than XVMC. The TL_AXB and TL_AAA of the dose to isocenter were −0.3 ± 1.4% and 0.6 ± 2.9%, respectively. Those of D₉₅ were 1.3 ± 1.8% and 1.7 ± 3.6%, respectively.ConclusionsThis study quantitatively demonstrated that the dosimetric performance of AXB is almost equal to that of XVMC, compared with that of AAA. Therefore, AXB is a more appropriate algorithm for an independent verification method for XVMC.     

Stereotactic radiotherapy for spinal hemangioblastoma – disease control and volume analysis in long-term follow up

BackgroundThis retrospective analysis evaluated the long-term outcome of spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment for hemangioblastomas.Materials and methodsBetween 2010 and 2018, 5 patients with 18 Von-Hippel Lindau-related pial-based spinal hemangioblastomas were treated with fractionated SBRT. After precisely registering images of all relevant datasets, we delineated the gross tumor volume, spinal cord (including intramedullary cysts and/or syrinxes), and past radiotherapy regions. A sequential optimization algorithm was used for dose determinations, and patients received 25–26 Gy in five fractions or 24 Gy in three fractions. On-line image guidance, based on spinal bone structures, and two orthogonal radiographs were provided. The actuarial nidus control, surgery-free survival, cyst/syrinx changes, and progression-free survival were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicities were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0.ResultsThe median follow-up was 5 years after SBRT. Patients displayed one nidus progression, one need of neurosurgery, and two cyst/syrinx progressions directly connected to symptom worsening. No SBRT-related complications or acute adverse radiation-related events occurred. However, one asymptomatic radiological sign of myelopathy occurred two years after SBRT. All tumors regressed; the one-year equivalent tumor volume reduction was 0.2 mL and the median volume significantly decreased by 28% (p = 0.012). Tumor volume reductions were not correlated with the mean (p = 0.19) or maximum (p = 0.16) dose.ConclusionsSBRT for pial-based spinal hemangioblastomas was an effective, safe, viable alternative to neurosurgery in asymptomatic patients. Escalating doses above the conventional dose-volume limits of spinal cord tolerance showed no additional benefit.     

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: Optimal treatment strategies based on liver segmentation and functional hepatic reserve

AimTo discuss current dosage for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and suggest alternative treatment strategies according to liver segmentation as defined by the Couinaud classification.BackgroundSBRT is a safe and effective alternative treatment for HCC patients who are unable to undergo liver ablation/resection. However, the SBRT fractionation schemes and treatment planning strategies are not well established.Materials and methodsIn this article, the latest developments and key findings from research studies exploring the efficacy of SBRT fractionation schemes for treatment of HCC are reviewed. Patients’ characteristics, fractionation schemes, treatment outcomes and toxicities were compiled. Special attention was focused on SBRT fractionation approaches that take into consideration liver segmentation according to the Couinaud classification and functional hepatic reserve based on Child–Pugh (CP) liver cirrhosis classification.ResultsThe most common SBRT fractionation schemes for HCC were 3 × 10–20 Gy, 4–6 × 8–10 Gy, and 10 × 5–5.5 Gy. Based on previous SBRT studies, and in consideration of tumor size and CP classification, we proposed 3 × 15–25 Gy for patients with tumor size <3 cm and adequate liver reserve (CP-A score 5), 5 × 10–12 Gy for patients with tumor sizes between 3 and 5 cm or inadequate liver reserve (CP-A score 6), and 10 × 5–5.5 Gy for patients with tumor size >5 cm or CP-B score.ConclusionsTreatment schemes in SBRT for HCC vary according to liver segmentation and functional hepatic reserve. Further prospective studies may be necessary to identify the optimal dose of SBRT for HCC.     

Variation of the prescription dose using the analytical anisotropic algorithm in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy

PurposeThe aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the dosimetric variation regarding the analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) relative to other algorithms in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We conducted a multi-institutional study involving six institutions using a secondary check program and compared the AAA to the Acuros XB (AXB) in two institutions.MethodsAll lung SBRT plans (128 patients) were generated using the AAA, pencil beam convolution with the Batho (PBC-B) and adaptive convolve (AC). All institutions used the same secondary check program (simple MU analysis [SMU]) implemented by a Clarkson-based dose calculation algorithm. Measurement was performed in a heterogeneous phantom to compare doses using the three different algorithms and the SMU for the measurements. A retrospective analysis was performed to compute the confidence limit (CL; mean ± 2SD) for the dose deviation between the AAA, PBC, AC and SMU. The variations between the AAA and AXB were evaluated in two institutions, then the CL was acquired.ResultsIn comparing the measurements, the AAA showed the largest systematic dose error (3%). In calculation comparisons, the CLs of the dose deviation were 8.7 ± 9.9% (AAA), 4.2 ± 3.9% (PBC-B) and 5.7 ± 4.9% (AC). The CLs of the dose deviation between the AXB and the AAA were 1.8 ± 1.5% and −0.1 ± 4.4%, respectively, in the two institutions.ConclusionsThe CL of the AAA showed much larger variation than the other algorithms. Relative to the AXB, larger systematic and random deviations still appeared. Thus, care should be taken in the use of AAA for lung SBRT.     

Applying radiobiological plan ranking methodology to VMAT prostate SBRT

The impact of a rectal spacer and an increased near maximum target dose in VMAT prostate SBRT is studied.For a group of 11 patients (35 Gy-in-five-fractions VMAT prostate SBRT) a set of 4 plans were generated, namely two VMAT plans, with D2% ⩽ 37.5 Gy (Hom) and with D2% ⩽ 40.2 Gy (Het), were created for each of two CT scans taken before (NoSpc) and after (Spc) transperineal spacer insertion. Consequently the methodology for parameter invariant TCP (tumor control probability) plan ranking was applied for comparison of the plans in terms of tumor control. NTCPs (normal tissue complication probabilities) were calculated for rectum and bladder using Lyman’s model.For all 11 patients the TCP plan ranking has shown that the Het plans would perform considerably better in TCP terms than the Hom ones. The plans without rectal spacer were ranked worse compared to those with rectal spacer except for one set of Hom plans. The calculated NTCPs for rectum produced by the Het plans were quite similar to the NTCPs of the Hom ones. The rectal NTCPs of the Hom Spc plans were always lower than the NTCPs of the Hom NoSpc plans. The NTCP values for bladder were extremely low in all cases.The use of rectal spacer leads in general to lower risk of rectal complications, as expected, and even to better tumor control. Plans with increased near maximum target dose (D2% ⩽ 40.2 Gy) are expected to perform much better in terms of tumor control than those with D2% ⩽ 37.5 Gy.     

Performance assessment of a new optimization system for robotic SBRT MLC-based plans

PurposeTo assess the performance of a new optimization system, VOLO, for CyberKnife MLC-based SBRT plans in comparison with the existing Sequential optimizer.MethodsMLC-plans were created for 25 SBRT cases (liver, prostate, pancreas and spine) using both VOLO and Sequential. Monitor units (MU), delivery time (DT), PTV coverage, conformity (nCI), dose gradient (R50%) and OAR doses were used for comparison and combined to obtain a mathematical score (MS) of plan quality for each solution. MS strength was validated by changing parameter weights and by a blinded clinical plan evaluation. The optimization times (OT) and the average segment areas (SA) were also compared.ResultsVOLO solutions offered significantly lower mean DT (−19%) and MU (−13%). OT were below 15 min for VOLO, whereas for Sequential, values spanned from 8 to 160 min. SAs were significantly larger for VOLO: on average 10 cm² versus 7 cm². VOLO optimized plans achieved a higher MS than Sequential for all tested parameter combinations. PTV coverage and OAR sparing were comparable for both groups of solutions. Although slight differences in R50% and nCI were found, the parameters most affecting MS were MU and DT. VOLO solutions were selected in 80% of cases by both physicians with 88% inter-observer agreement.ConclusionsThe good performance of the VOLO optimization system, together with the large reduction in OT, make it a useful tool to improve the efficiency of CK SBRT planning and delivery. The proposed methodology for comparing different planning solutions can be applied in other contexts.