Random mutagenesis of the complement factor 5a (C5a) receptor N terminus provides a structural constraint for C5a docking

The N terminus of G protein-coupled receptors has been implicated in binding to peptide hormones. We have used random saturation mutagenesis to identify essential residues in the N terminus of the human complement factor 5a receptor (C5aR). In a library of N-terminal mutant C5aR molecules screened for activation by C5a, residues 24-30 of the C5aR showed a marked propensity to mutate to cysteine, most likely indicating that sulfhydryl groups at these positions are appropriately situated to form disulfide interactions with the unpaired Cys(27) of human C5a. This presumptive spatial constraint allowed the ligand to be computationally docked to the receptor to form a model of the C5a/C5aR interaction. When the N-terminal mutant C5aR library was rescreened with C5a C27R, a ligand incapable of disulfide interactions, no individual position in the N terminus was essential for receptor signaling. However, the region 19-29 was relatively highly conserved in the functional mutants, further demonstrating that this region of the C5aR makes a productive physiologic interaction with the C5a ligand.     

Identification of ligand effector binding sites in transmembrane regions of the human G protein-coupled C3a receptor

The human C3a anaphylatoxin receptor (C3aR) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) composed of seven transmembrane alpha-helices connected by hydrophilic loops. Previous studies of chimeric C3aR/C5aR and loop deletions in C3aR demonstrated that the large extracellular loop2 plays an important role in noneffector ligand binding; however, the effector binding site for C3a has not been identified. In this study, selected charged residues in the transmembrane regions of C3aR were replaced by Ala using site-directed mutagenesis, and mutant receptors were stably expressed in the RBL-2H3 cell line. Ligand binding studies demonstrated that R161A (helix IV), R340A (helix V), and D417A (helix VII) showed no binding activity, although full expression of these receptors was established by flow cytometric analysis. C3a induced very weak intracellular calcium flux in cells expressing these three mutant receptors. H81A (helix II) and K96A (helix III) showed decreased ligand binding activity. The calcium flux induced by C3a in H81A and K96A cells was also consistently reduced. These findings suggest that the charged transmembrane residues Arg161, Arg340, and Asp417 in C3aR are essential for ligand effector binding and/or signal coupling, and that residues His81 and Lys96 may contribute less directly to the overall free energy of ligand binding. These transmembrane residues in C3aR identify specific molecular contacts for ligand interactions that account for C3a-induced receptor activation.     

Role of the second extracellular loop of human C3a receptor in agonist binding and receptor function

The C3a anaphylatoxin receptor (C3aR) is a G protein-coupled receptor with an unusually large second extracellular loop (e2 loop, approximately 172 amino acids). To determine the function of this unique structure, chimeric and deletion mutants were prepared and analyzed in transfected RBL-2H3 cells. Whereas replacement of the C3aR N-terminal segment with that from the human C5a receptor had minimal effect on C3a binding, substitution of the e2 loop with a smaller e2 loop from the C5a receptor (C5aR) abolished binding of 125I-C3a and C3a-stimulated calcium mobilization. However, as much as 65% of the e2 loop sequence (amino acids 198-308) may be removed without affecting C3a binding or calcium responses. The e2 loop sequences adjacent to the transmembrane domains contain multiple aspartate residues and are found to play an important role in C3a binding based on deletion mutagenesis. Replacement of five aspartate residues in the e2 loop with lysyl residues significantly compromised both the binding and functional capabilities of the C3a receptor mediated by intact C3a or by two C3a analog peptides. These data suggest a two-site C3a-C3aR interaction model similar to that established for C5a/C5aR. The anionic residues near the N and C termini of the C3aR e2 loop constitute a non-effector secondary interaction site with cationic residues in the C-terminal helical region of C3a, whereas the C3a C-terminal sequence LGLAR engages the primary effector site in C3aR.     

Structural models for the complex of chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus with the C5a receptor

The study presents structural models for the complex of the chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus, CHIPS, and receptor for anaphylotoxin C5a, C5aR. The models are based on the recently found NMR structure of the complex between CHIPS fragment 31-121 and C5aR fragment 7-28, as well as on previous results of molecular modeling of C5aR. Simple and straightforward modeling procedure selected low-energy conformations of the C5aR fragment 8-41 that simultaneously fit the NMR structure of the C5aR 10-18 fragment and properly orient the NMR structure of CHIPS_31-121 relative to C5aR. Extensive repacking of the side chains of CHIPS_31-121 and C5aR_8-41 predicted specific residue-residue interactions on the interface between CHIPS and C5aR. Many of these interactions were rationalized with experimental data obtained by site-directed mutagenesis of CHIPS and C5aR. The models correctly showed that CHIPS binds only to the first binding site of C5a to C5aR not competing with C5a fragment 59-74, which binds the second binding site of C5aR. The models also predict that two elements of CHIPS, fragments 48-58 and 97-111, may be used as structural templates for potential inhibitors of C5a.     

Chimeric receptors of the human C3a receptor and C5a receptor (CD88)

Chimeras were generated between the human anaphylatoxin C3a and C5a receptors (C3aR and C5aR, respectively) to define the structural requirements for ligand binding and discrimination. Chimeric receptors were generated by systematically exchanging between the two receptors four receptor modules (the N terminus, transmembrane regions 1 to 4, the second extracellular loop, and transmembrane region 5 to the C terminus). The mutants were transiently expressed in HEK-293 cells (with or without Galpha-16) and analyzed for cell surface expression, binding of C3a and C5a, and functional responsiveness (calcium mobilization) toward C3a, C5a, and a C3a as well as a C5a analogue peptide. The data indicate that in both anaphylatoxin receptors the transmembrane regions and the second extracellular loop act as a functional unit that is disrupted by any reciprocal exchange. N-terminal substitution confirmed the two-binding site model for the human C5aR, in which the receptor N terminus is required for high affinity binding of the native ligand but not a C5a analogue peptide. In contrast, the human C3a receptor did not require the original N terminus for high affinity binding of and activation by C3a, a result that was confirmed by N-terminal deletion mutants. This indicates a completely different binding mode of the anaphylatoxins to their corresponding receptors. The C5a analogue peptide, but not C5a, was an agonist of the C3aR. Replacement of the C3aR N terminus by the C5aR sequence, however, lead to the generation of a true hybrid C3a/C5a receptor, which bound and functionally responded to both ligands, C3a and C5a.     

Sulfation of tyrosine 174 in the human C3a receptor is essential for binding of C3a anaphylatoxin

The complement anaphylatoxin C3a and its cellular seven-transmembrane segment receptor, C3aR, are implicated in a variety of pathological inflammatory processes. C3aR is a G-protein-coupled receptor with an exceptionally large second extracellular loop of 172 amino acids. Previously reported deletion studies have shown that at least part of this region plays a critical role in binding C3a. Our data now demonstrate that five tyrosines in the second extracellular loop of the C3aR are posttranslationally modified by the addition of sulfate. Blocking sulfation by mutation of tyrosine to phenylalanine at positions 184, 188, 317, and/or 318 does not affect ligand binding or signal transduction. However, when tyrosine 174 is mutated to phenylalanine, binding of native C3a is completely blocked. This variant efficiently mobilizes calcium in response to synthetic C3a agonist peptides, but not to native C3a. This finding is consistent with a two-site model of ligand association typical of many peptide ligand-receptor interactions and identifies sulfotyrosine 174 as the critical C3a docking site. Tyrosine sulfation in the amino-terminal extracellular domain has been shown to be important in several other seven-transmembrane segment receptors. Our data now demonstrate that tyrosine sulfate in other extracellular domains can function for ligand interactions as well.     

Structure of the complement factor 5a receptor-ligand complex studied by disulfide trapping and molecular modeling

Complement factor 5a (C5a) is an anaphylatoxin that acts by binding to a G protein-coupled receptor, the C5aR. The relative orientation of this ligand-receptor pair is investigated here using the novel technique of disulfide trapping by random mutagenesis (DTRM) and molecular modeling. In the DTRM technique, an unpaired cysteine is introduced in the ligand, and a library of randomly mutagenized receptors is screened to identify mutants that introduce a cysteine at a position in the receptor that allows functional interactions with the ligand. By repeating this analysis at six positions of C5a, we identify six unique sets of intermolecular interactions for the C5a-C5aR complex, which are then compared with an independently developed computational three-dimensional model of the complex. This analysis reveals that the interface of the receptor N terminus with the cysteine-containing ligand molecules is selected from a variety of possible receptor conformations that exist in dynamic equilibrium. In contrast, DTRM identifies a single position in the second extracellular loop of the receptor that interacts specifically with a cysteine probe placed in the C-terminal tail of the C5a ligand.     

Site-specific mutations in the N-terminal region of human C5a that affect interactions of C5a with the neutrophil C5a receptor.

C5a is an inflammatory mediator that evokes a variety of immune effector functions including chemotaxis, cell activation, spasmogenesis, and immune modulation. It is well established that the effector site in C5a is located in the C-terminal region, although other regions in C5a also contribute to receptor interaction. We have examined the N-terminal region (NTR) of human C5a by replacing selected residues in the NTR with glycine via site-directed mutagenesis. Mutants of rC5a were expressed as fusion proteins, and rC5a was isolated after factor Xa cleavage. The potency of the mutants was evaluated by measuring both neutrophil chemotaxis and degranulation (beta-glucuronidase release). Mutants that contained the single residue substitutions Ile-6-->Gly or Tyr-13-->Gly were reduced in potency to 4-30% compared with wild-type rC5a. Other single-site glycine substitutions at positions Leu-2, Ala-10, Lys-4, Lys-5, Glu-7, Glu-8, and Lys-14 showed little effect on C5a potency. The double mutant, Ile-6-->Gly/Tyr-13-->Gly, was reduced in potency to < 0.2%, which correlated with a correspondingly low binding affinity for neutrophil C5a receptors. Circular dichroism studies revealed a 40% reduction in alpha-helical content for the double mutant, suggesting that the NTR contributes stabilizing interactions that maintain local secondary or tertiary structure of C5a important for receptor interaction. We conclude that the N-terminal region in C5a is involved in receptor binding either through direct interaction with the receptor or by stabilizing a binding site elsewhere in the intact C5a molecule.     

Residues 10-18 within the C5a receptor N terminus compose a binding domain for chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus

Chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus (CHIPS) is excreted by the majority of S. aureus strains and is a potent inhibitor of C5a- and formylated peptide-mediated chemotaxis of neutrophils and monocytes. Recently, we reported that CHIPS binds to the C5a receptor (C5aR) and the formylated peptide receptor, thereby blocking activation by C5a and formylated peptides, respectively. The anaphylatoxin C5a plays an important role in host immunity and pathological inflammatory processes. For C5a a two-site binding model is proposed in which C5a initially binds the C5aR N terminus, followed by interaction of the C5a C-terminal tail with an effector domain on the receptor. We have shown here that CHIPS does not affect activation of the C5aR by a peptide mimic of the C5a C terminus. Moreover, CHIPS was found to bind human embryonic kidney 293 cells expressing only the C5aR N terminus. Deletion and mutation experiments within this C5aR N-terminal expression system revealed that the binding site of CHIPS is contained in a short stretch of 9 amino acids (amino acids 10-18), of which the aspartic acid residues at positions 10, 15, and 18 plus the glycine at position 12 are crucial. Binding studies with C5aR/C3aR and C5aR/IL8RA chimeras confirmed that CHIPS binds only to the C5aR N terminus without involvement of its extracellular loops. CHIPS may provide new strategies to block the C5aR, which may lead to the development of new C5aR antagonists.     

The C5a Receptor (C5aR) C5L2 Is a Modulator of C5aR-mediated Signal Transduction

The complement anaphylatoxin C5a is a proinflammatory component of host defense that functions through two identified receptors, C5a receptor (C5aR) and C5L2. C5aR is a classical G protein-coupled receptor, whereas C5L2 is structurally homologous but deficient in G protein coupling. In human neutrophils, we show C5L2 is predominantly intracellular, whereas C5aR is expressed on the plasma membrane. Confocal analysis shows internalized C5aR following ligand binding is co-localized with both C5L2 and β-arrestin. Antibody blockade of C5L2 results in a dramatic increase in C5a-mediated chemotaxis and ERK1/2 phosphorylation but does not alter C5a-mediated calcium mobilization, supporting its role in modulation of the β-arrestin pathway. Association of C5L2 with β-arrestin is confirmed by cellular co-immunoprecipitation assays. C5L2 blockade also has no effect on ligand uptake or C5aR endocytosis in human polymorphonuclear leukocytes, distinguishing its role from that of a rapid recycling or scavenging receptor in this cell type. This is thus the first example of a naturally occurring seven-transmembrane segment receptor that is both obligately uncoupled from G proteins and a negative modulator of signal transduction through the β-arrestin pathway. Physiologically, these properties provide the possibility for additional fine-tuning of host defense.     

Probing a model of a GPCR/ligand complex in an explicit membrane environment: the human cholecystokinin-1 receptor

A three-dimensional model structure of a complex formed by a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) and an agonist ligand is probed and refined using molecular-dynamics simulations and free energy calculations in a realistic environment. The model of the human receptor of cholecystokinin associated to agonist ligand CCK9 was obtained from a synergistic procedure combining site-directed mutagenesis experiments and in silico modeling. The 31-ns molecular-dynamics simulation in an explicit membrane environment indicates that both the structure of the receptor and its interactions with the ligand are robust. Whereas the secondary structure of the alpha-helix bundle is well preserved, the region of the intracellular loops exhibits a significant flexibility likely to be ascribed to the absence of G-protein subunits in the model. New insight into the structural features of the binding pocket is gained, in particular, the interplay of the ligand with both the receptor and internal water molecules. Water-mediated interactions are shown to participate in the binding, hence, suggesting additional site-directed mutagenesis experiments. Accurate free energy calculations on mutated ligands provide differences in the receptor-ligand binding affinity, thus offering a direct, quantitative comparison to experiment. We propose that this detailed consistency-checking procedure be used as a routine refinement step of in vacuo GPCR models, before further investigation and application to structure-based drug design.     

An activation switch in the ligand binding pocket of the C5a receptor

Although agonists are thought to occupy binding pockets within the seven-helix core of serpentine receptors, the topography of these binding pockets and the conformational changes responsible for receptor activation are poorly understood. To identify the ligand binding pocket in the receptor for complement factor 5a (C5aR), we assessed binding affinities of hexapeptide ligands, each mutated at a single position, for seven mutant C5aRs, each mutated at a single position in the putative ligand binding site. In ChaW (an antagonist) and W5Cha (an agonist), the side chains at position 5 are tryptophan and cyclohexylalanine, respectively. Comparisons of binding affinities indicated that the hexapeptide residue at this position interacts with two C5aR residues, Ile-116 (helix III) and Val-286 (helix VII); in a C5aR model these two side chains point toward one another. Both the I116A and the V286A mutations markedly increased binding affinity of W5Cha but not that of ChaW. Moreover, ChaW, the antagonist hexapeptide, acted as a full agonist on the I116A mutant. These results argue that C5aR residues Ile-116 and Val-286 interact with the side chain at position 5 of the hexapeptide ligand to form an activation switch. Based on this and previous work, we present a docking model for the hexapeptide within the C5aR binding pocket. We propose that agonists induce a small change in the relative orientations of helices III and VII and that these helices work together to allow movement of helix VI away from the receptor core, thereby triggering G protein activation.     

Comparative agonist/antagonist responses in mutant human C5a receptors define the ligand binding site

The C terminus is responsible for all of the agonist activity of C5a at human C5a receptors (C5aRs). In this report we have mapped the ligand binding site on the C5aR using a series of agonist and antagonist peptide mimics of the C terminus of C5a as well as receptors mutated at putative interaction sites (Ile(116), Arg(175,) Arg(206), Glu(199), Asp(282), and Val(286)). Agonist peptide 1 (Phe-Lys-Pro-d-cyclohexylalanine-cyclohexylalanine-d-Arg) can be converted to an antagonist by substituting the bulkier Trp for cyclohexylalanine at position 5 (peptide 2). Conversely, mutation of C5aR transmembrane residue Ile(116) to the smaller Ala (I116A) makes the receptor respond to peptide 2 as an agonist (Gerber, B. O., Meng, E. C., Dotsch, V., Baranski, T. J., and Bourne, H. R. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 3394-3400). However, a potent cyclic hexapeptide antagonist, Phe-cyclo-[Orn-Pro-d-cyclohexylalanine-Trp-Arg] (peptide 3), derived from peptide 2 and which binds to the same receptor site, remains a full antagonist at I116AC5aR. This suggests that although the residue at position 5 might bind near to Ile(116), the latter is not essential for either activation or antagonism. Arg(206) and Arg(175) both appear to interact with the C-terminal carboxylate of C5a agonist peptides, suggesting a dynamic binding mechanism that may be a part of a receptor activation switch. Asp(282) has been previously shown to interact with the side chain of the C-terminal Arg residue, and Glu(199) may also interact with this side chain in both C5a and peptide mimics. Using these interactions to orient NMR-derived ligand structures in the binding site of C5aR, a new model of the interaction between peptide antagonists and the C5aR is presented.     

Discovery of human antibodies against the C5aR target using phage display technology

Phage display technologies have been increasingly utilized for the generation of therapeutic, imaging and purification reagents for a number of biological targets. Using a variety of different approaches, we have developed antibodies with high specificity and affinity for various targets ranging from small peptides to large proteins, soluble or membrane-associated as well as to activated forms of enzymes. We have applied this approach to G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), often considered difficult targets for antibody therapeutics and targeting. Here we demonstrate the use of this technology for the identification of human antibodies targeting C5aR, the chemoattractant GPCR receptor for anaphylatoxin C5a. The N-terminal region (residues 1-31) of C5aR, one of the ligand binding sites, was synthesized, biotinylated and used as the target for selection. Three rounds of selection with our proprietary human Fab phage display library were performed. Screening of 768 isolates by phage ELISA identified 374 positive clones. Based on sequence alignment analysis, the positive clones were divided into 22 groups. Representative Fab clones from each group were reformatted into IgGs and tested for binding to C5aR-expressing cells, the differentiated U-937 cells. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that nine out of 16 reformatted IgGs bound to cells. Competition with a C5aR monoclonal antibody S5/1 which recognizes the same N-terminal region showed that S5/1 blocked the binding of positive cell binders to the peptide used for selections, indicating that the identified cell binding IgGs were specific to C5aR. These antibody binders represent viable candidates as therapeutic or imaging agents, illustrating that phage display technology provides a rapid means for developing antibodies to a difficult class of targets such as GPCRs.     

Mapping Spatial Relationships between Residues in the Ligand-Binding Domain of the 5-Ht3 Receptor Using a Molecular Ruler

The serotonin 5-HT₃ receptor (5-HT₃R) is a member of the Cys-loop ligand-gated ion channel family. We used a combination of site-directed mutagenesis, homology modeling, and ligand-docking simulations to analyze antagonist-receptor interactions. Mutation of E236, which is near loop C of the binding site, to aspartate prevents expression of the receptor on the cell surface, and no specific ligand binding can be detected. On the other hand, mutation to glutamine, asparagine, or alanine produces receptors that are expressed on the cell surface, but decreases receptor affinity for the competitive antagonist d-tubocurarine (dTC) 5-35-fold. The results of a double-mutant cycle analysis employing a panel of dTC analogs to identify specific points of interactions between the dTC analogs and E236 are consistent with E236 making a direct physical interaction with the 12 -OH of dTC. dTC is a rigid molecule of known three-dimensional structure. Together with previous studies linking other regions of dTC to specific residues in the binding site, these data allow us to define the relative spatial arrangement of three different residues in the ligand-binding site: R92 (loop D), N128 (loop A), and E236 (near loop C). Molecular modeling employing these distance constraints followed by molecular-dynamics simulations produced a dTC/receptor complex consistent with the experimental data. The use of the rigid ligands as molecular rulers in conjunction with double-mutant cycle analysis provides a means of mapping the relative positions of various residues in the ligand-binding site of any ligand-receptor complex, and thus is a useful tool for delineating the architecture of the binding site.     

Neutraligands of C5a can potentially occlude the interaction of C5a with the complement receptors C5aR1 and C5aR2

The complement system is central to the rapid immune response witnessed in vertebrates and invertebrates, which plays a crucial role in physiology and pathophysiology. Complement activation fuels the proteolytic cascade, which produces several complement fragments that interacts with a distinct set of complement receptors. Among all the complement fragments, C5a is one of the most potent anaphylatoxins, which exerts solid pro-inflammatory responses in a myriad of tissues by binding to the complement receptors such as C5aR1 (CD88, C5aR) and C5aR2 (GPR77, C5L2), which are part of the rhodopsin subfamily of G-protein coupled receptors. In terms of signaling cascade, recruitment of C5aR1 or C5aR2 by C5a triggers the association of either G-proteins or β-arrestins, providing a protective response under normal physiological conditions and a destructive response under pathophysiological conditions. As a result, both deficiency and unregulated activation of the complement lead to clinical conditions that require therapeutic intervention. Indeed, complement therapeutics targeting either the complement fragments or the complement receptors are being actively pursued by both industry and academia. In this context, the model structural complex of C5a–C5aR1 interactions, followed by a biophysical evaluation of the model complex, has been elaborated on earlier. In addition, through the drug repurposing strategy, we have shown that small molecule drugs such as raloxifene and prednisone may act as neutraligands of C5a by effectively binding to C5a and altering its biologically active molecular conformation. Very recently, structural models illustrating the intermolecular interaction of C5a with C5aR2 have also been elaborated by our group. In the current study, we provide the biophysical validation of the C5a-C5aR2 model complex by recruiting major synthetic peptide fragments of C5aR2 against C5a. In addition, the ability of the selected neutraligands to hinder the interaction of C5a with the peptide fragments derived from both C5aR1 and C5aR2 has also been explored. Overall, the computational and experimental data provided in the current study supports the idea that small molecule drugs targeting C5a can potentially neutralize C5a's ability to interact effectively with its cognate complement receptors, which can be beneficial in modulating the destructive signaling response of C5a under pathological conditions.     

Structure and characterization of a high affinity C5a monoclonal antibody that blocks binding to C5aR1 and C5aR2 receptors

C5a is a potent anaphylatoxin that modulates inflammation through the C5aR1 and C5aR2 receptors. The molecular interactions between C5a–C5aR1 receptor are well defined, whereas C5a–C5aR2 receptor interactions are poorly understood. Here, we describe the generation of a human antibody, MEDI7814, that neutralizes C5a and C5adesArg binding to the C5aR1 and C5aR2 receptors, without affecting complement–mediated bacterial cell killing. Unlike other anti–C5a mAbs described, this antibody has been shown to inhibit the effects of C5a by blocking C5a binding to both C5aR1 and C5aR2 receptors. The crystal structure of the antibody in complex with human C5a reveals a discontinuous epitope of 22 amino acids. This is the first time the epitope for an antibody that blocks C5aR1 and C5aR2 receptors has been described, and this work provides a basis for molecular studies aimed at further understanding the C5a–C5aR2 receptor interaction. MEDI7814 has therapeutic potential for the treatment of acute inflammatory conditions in which both C5a receptors may mediate inflammation, such as sepsis or renal ischemia–reperfusion injury.     

Mapping the ligand-binding site on the C5a receptor: arginine74 of C5a contacts aspartate282 of the C5a receptor.

The interaction between the anaphylatoxin C5a and its receptor involves two distinct sites. One site is formed by acidic residues at the receptor N-terminus and contributes to only ligand binding. The second site, responsible for activation, is less well defined. In this study, we demonstrate that the receptor residue D(282), near the extracellular face of transmembrane domain VII, is a component of the second ligand-binding site. Mutation of D(282) to A decreases the sensitivity of the receptor to activation by intact C5a but not by its less potent metabolite, C5adR(74), which lacks the C-terminal arginine(74). The mutation of the R(74) residue of C5a to A causes a 60-fold decrease in wild-type receptor sensitivity, but only a 2-fold decrease for the receptor mutated at D(282). In contrast, the mutation of R(74) to D makes C5a completely inactive on both wild-type and A(282) C5a receptors. The mutation of D(282) to R partly restores the response to C5a[D(74)], which is a more effective ligand than C5a at the mutant receptor. A peptide mimic of the C5a activation domain with a C-terminal R potently activates the wild type but is only a weak agonist at the mutant D(282)R-C5a receptor. Conversely, a peptide with D at the C-terminus is a more effective activator of D(282)R than wild-type C5a receptors. These data indicate that the R(74) side chain of C5a makes an interaction with receptor D(282) that is responsible for the higher potency of intact C5a versus that of C5adR(74).     

The loop C region of the murine 5-HT3A receptor contributes to the differential actions of 5-hydroxytryptamine and m-chlorophenylbiguanide

Sequence and predicted structural similarities between members of the Cys loop superfamily of ligand-gated ion channel receptors and the acetylcholine binding protein (AChBP) suggest that the ligand-binding site is formed by six loops that intersect at subunit interfaces. We employed site-directed mutagenesis to investigate the role of amino acids from the loop C region of the murine 5-HT(3AS)R in interacting with two structurally different agonists, serotonin (5-HT) and m-chlorophenylbiguanide (mCPBG). Mutant receptors were evaluated using radioligand binding, two-electrode voltage clamp, and immunofluorescence studies. Electrophysiological assays were employed to identify changes in response characteristics and relative efficacies of mCPBG and the partial agonist, 2-methyl 5-HT (2-Me5-HT). We have also constructed novel 5-HT and mCPBG docked models of the receptor binding site based on homology models of the AChBP. Both ligand-docked models correlate well with results from mutagenesis and electrophysiological assays. Four key amino acids were identified as being important to ligand binding and/or gating of the receptor. Among these, I228 and D229 are specific for effects mediated by 5-HT compared to mCPBG, indicating a differential interaction of these ligands with loop C. Residues F226 and Y234 are important for both 5-HT and mCPBG interactions. Mutations at F226, I228, and Y234 also altered the relative efficacies of agonists, suggesting a role in the gating mechanism.