Geometric Attributes of Retaining Glycosyltransferase Enzymes Favor an Orthogonal Mechanism

Retaining glycosyltransferase enzymes retain the stereochemistry of the donor glycosidic linkage after transfer to an acceptor molecule. The mechanism these enzymes utilize to achieve retention of the anomeric stereochemistry has been a matter of much debate. Re-analysis of previously released structural data from retaining and inverting glycosyltransferases allows competing mechanistic proposals to be evaluated. The binding of metal-nucleotide-sugars between inverting and retaining enzymes is conformationally unique and requires the donor substrate to occupy two different orientations in the two types of glycosyltransferases. The available structures of retaining glycosyltransferases lack appropriately positioned enzymatic dipolar residues to initiate or stabilize the intermediates of a dissociative mechanism. Further, available structures show that the acceptor nucleophile and anomeric carbon of the donor sugar are in close proximity. Structural features support orthogonal (front-side) attack from a position lying ≤90° from the C1-O phosphate bond for retaining enzymes. These structural conclusions are consistent with the geometric conclusions of recent kinetic and computational studies.     

Structural dissection and high-throughput screening of mannosylglycerate synthase

The enzymatic transfer of activated mannose yields mannosides in glycoconjugates and oligo- and polysaccharides. Yet, despite its biological necessity, the mechanism by which glycosyltransferases recognize mannose and catalyze its transfer to acceptor molecules is poorly understood. Here, we report broad high-throughput screening and kinetic analyses of both natural and synthetic substrates of Rhodothermus marinus mannosylglycerate synthase (MGS), which catalyzes the formation of the stress protectant 2-O-alpha-D-mannosyl glycerate. The sequence of MGS indicates that it is at the cusp of inverting and retaining transferases. The structures of apo MGS and complexes with donor and acceptor molecules, including GDP-mannose, combined with mutagenesis of the binding and catalytic sites, unveil the mannosyl transfer center. Nucleotide specificity is as important in GDP-D-mannose recognition as the nature of the donor sugar.     

Crystal structure of an alpha 1,4-N-acetylhexosaminyltransferase (EXTL2), a member of the exostosin gene family involved in heparan sulfate biosynthesis

EXTL2, an alpha1,4-N-acetylhexosaminyltransferase, catalyzes the transfer reaction of N-acetylglucosamine and N-acetylgalactosamine from the respective UDP-sugars to the non-reducing end of [glucuronic acid]beta1-3[galactose]beta1-O-naphthalenemethanol, an acceptor substrate analog of the natural common linker of various glycosylaminoglycans. We have solved the x-ray crystal structure of the catalytic domain of mouse EXTL2 in the apo-form and with donor substrates UDP-N-acetylglucosamine and UDP-N-acetylgalactosamine. In addition, a structure of the ternary complex with UDP and the acceptor substrate analog [glucuronic acid]beta1-3[galactose]beta1-O-naphthalenemethanol has been determined. These structures reveal three highly conserved residues, Asn-243, Asp-246, and Arg-293, located at the active site. Mutation of these residues greatly decreases the activity. In the ternary complex, an interaction exists between the beta-phosphate of the UDP leaving group and the acceptor hydroxyl of the substrate that may play a functional role in catalysis. These structures represent the first structures from the exostosin gene family and provide important insight into the mechanisms of alpha1,4-N-acetylhexosaminyl transfer in heparan biosynthesis.     

Crystal structures of the T4 phage beta-glucosyltransferase and the D100A mutant in complex with UDP-glucose: glucose binding and identification of the catalytic base for a direct displacement mechanism

T4 phage beta-glucosyltransferase (BGT) is an inverting glycosyltransferase (GT) that transfers glucose from uridine diphospho-glucose (UDP-glucose) to an acceptor modified DNA. BGT belongs to the GT-B structural superfamily, represented, so far, by five different inverting or retaining GT families. Here, we report three high-resolution X-ray structures of BGT and a point mutant solved in the presence of UDP-glucose. The two co-crystal structures of the D100A mutant show that, unlike the wild-type enzyme, this mutation prevents glucose hydrolysis. This strongly indicates that Asp100 is the catalytic base. We obtained the wild-type BGT-UDP-glucose complex by soaking substrate-free BGT crystals. Comparison with a previous structure of BGT solved in the presence of the donor product UDP and an acceptor analogue provides the first model of an inverting GT-B enzyme in which both the donor and acceptor substrates are bound to the active site. The structural analyses support the in-line displacement reaction mechanism previously proposed, locate residues involved in donor substrate specificity and identify the catalytic base.     

The influence of an intramolecular hydrogen bond in differential recognition of inhibitory acceptor analogs by human ABO(H) blood group A and B glycosyltransferases

Human ABO(H) blood group glycosyltransferases GTA and GTB catalyze the final monosaccharide addition in the biosynthesis of the human A and B blood group antigens. GTA and GTB utilize a common acceptor, the H antigen disaccharide alpha-l-Fucp-(1-->2)-beta-d-Galp-OR, but different donors, where GTA transfers GalNAc from UDP-GalNAc and GTB transfers Gal from UDP-Gal. GTA and GTB are two of the most homologous enzymes known to transfer different donors and differ in only 4 amino acid residues, but one in particular (Leu/Met-266) has been shown to dominate the selection between donor sugars. The structures of the A and B glycosyltransferases have been determined to high resolution in complex with two inhibitory acceptor analogs alpha-l-Fucp(1-->2)-beta-d-(3-deoxy)-Galp-OR and alpha-l-Fucp-(1-->2)-beta-d-(3-amino)-Galp-OR, in which the 3-hydroxyl moiety of the Gal ring has been replaced by hydrogen or an amino group, respectively. Remarkably, although the 3-deoxy inhibitor occupies the same conformation and position observed for the native H antigen in GTA and GTB, the 3-amino analog is recognized differently by the two enzymes. The 3-amino substitution introduces a novel intramolecular hydrogen bond between O2' on Fuc and N3' on Gal, which alters the minimum-energy conformation of the inhibitor. In the absence of UDP, the 3-amino analog can be accommodated by either GTA or GTB with the l-Fuc residue partially occupying the vacant UDP binding site. However, in the presence of UDP, the analog is forced to abandon the intramolecular hydrogen bond, and the l-Fuc residue is shifted to a less ordered conformation. Further, the residue Leu/Met-266 that was thought important only in distinguishing between donor substrates is observed to interact differently with the 3-amino acceptor analog in GTA and GTB. These observations explain why the 3-deoxy analog acts as a competitive inhibitor of the glycosyltransferase reaction, whereas the 3-amino analog displays complex modes of inhibition.     

Structural basis of ordered binding of donor and acceptor substrates to the retaining glycosyltransferase,alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase

Bovine alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase (alpha3GT) catalyzes the synthesis of the alpha-galactose (alpha-Gal) epitope, the target of natural human antibodies. It represents a family of enzymes, including the histo blood group A and B transferases, that catalyze retaining glycosyltransfer reactions of unknown mechanism. An initial study of alpha3GT in a crystal form with limited resolution and considerable disorder suggested the possible formation of a beta-galactosyl-enzyme covalent intermediate (Gastinel, L. N., Bignon, C., Misra, A. K., Hindsgaul, O., Shaper, J. H., and Joziasse, D. H. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 638-649). Highly ordered structures are described for complexes of alpha3GT with donor substrate, UDP-galactose, UDP- glucose, and two acceptor substrates, lactose and N-acetyllactosamine, at resolutions up to 1.46 A. Structural and calorimetric binding studies suggest an obligatory ordered binding of donor and acceptor substrates, linked to a donor substrate-induced conformational change, and the direct participation of UDP in acceptor binding. The monosaccharide-UDP bond is cleaved in the structures containing UDP-galactose and UDP-glucose, producing non-covalent complexes containing buried beta-galactose and alpha-glucose. The location of these monosaccharides and molecular modeling suggest that binding of a distorted conformation of UDP-galactose may be important in the catalytic mechanism of alpha3GT.     

Crystal structure of beta 1,3-glucuronyltransferase I in complex with active donor substrate UDP-GlcUA

Beta1,3-glucuronyltransferase (GlcAT-I) is an essential enzyme involved in heparan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate biosynthesis. GlcAT-I is an inverting glycosyltransferase that catalyzes the transfer of glucuronic acid (GlcUA) to the common growing linker region Galbeta1-3Galbeta1-4Xyl that is attached to a serine side chain of a core protein. Previously the structure of GlcAT-I has been solved in the presence of the donor product UDP and an acceptor analog Galbeta1-3Galbeta1-4Xyl (Pedersen, L. C., Tsuchida, K., Kitagawa, H., Sugahara, K., Darden, T. A. & Negishi, M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 34580-34585). Here we report the x-ray crystal structure of GlcAT-I in complex with the complete donor UDP-GlcUA, thereby providing structures of an inverting glycosyltransferase in which both the complete donor and acceptor substrates are present in the active site. This structure supports the in-line displacement reaction mechanism previously proposed. It also provides information on the essential amino acid residues that determine donor substrate specificity.     

Crystal structure of Vibrionaceae Photobacterium sp. JT-ISH-224 alpha2,6-sialyltransferase in a ternary complex with donor product CMP and acceptor substrate lactose: catalytic mechanism and substrate recognition

Sialyltransferases are a family of glycosyltransferases that catalyze the transfer of N-acetylneuraminic acid residues from cytidine monophosphate N-acetylneuraminic acid (CMP-NeuAc) as a donor substrate to the carbohydrate groups of glycoproteins and glycolipids as acceptor substrates. We determined the crystal structure of Delta16psp26ST, the N-terminal truncated form of alpha2,6-sialyltransferase from Vibrionaceae Photobacterium sp. JT-ISH-224, complexed with a donor product CMP and an acceptor substrate lactose. Delta16psp26ST has three structural domains. Domain 1 belongs to the immunoglobulin-like beta-sandwich fold, and domains 2 and 3 form the glycosyltransferase-B structure. The CMP and lactose were bound in the deep cleft between domains 2 and 3. In the structure, only Asp232 was within hydrogen-binding distance of the acceptor O6 carbon of the galactose residue in lactose, and His405 was within hydrogen-binding distance of the phosphate oxygen of CMP. Mutation of these residues greatly decreased the activity of the enzyme. These structural and mutational results indicated that Asp232 might act as a catalytic base for deprotonation of the acceptor substrate, and His405 might act as a catalytic acid for protonation of the donor substrate. These findings are consistent with an in-line-displacement reaction mechanism in which Delta16psp26ST catalyzes the inverting transfer reaction. Unlike the case with multifunctional sialyltransferase (Delta24PmST1) complexed with CMP and lactose, the crystal structure of which was recently reported, the alpha2,6 reaction specificity of Delta16psp26ST is likely to be determined by His123.     

Conserved domains of glycosyltransferases.

Glycosyltransferases catalyze the synthesis of glycoconjugates by transferring a properly activated sugar residue to an appropriate acceptor molecule or aglycone for chain initiation and elongation. The acceptor can be a lipid, a protein, a heterocyclic compound, or another carbohydrate residue. A catalytic reaction is believed to involve the recognition of both the donor and acceptor by suitable domains, as well as the catalytic site of the enzyme. To elucidate the structural requirements for substrate recognition and catalytic reactions of glycosyltransferases, we have searched the databases for homologous sequences, identified conserved amino acid residues, and proposed potential domain motifs for these enzymes. Depending on the configuration of the anomeric functional group of the glycosyl donor molecule and of the resulting glycoconjugate, all known glycosyltransferases can be divided into two major types: retaining glycosyltransferases, which transfer sugar residue with the retention of anomeric configuration, and inverting glycosyltransferases, which transfer sugar residue with the inversion of anomeric configuration. One conserved domain of the inverting glycosyltransferases identified in the database is responsible for the recognition of a pyrimidine nucleotide, which is either the UDP or the TDP portion of a donor sugar-nucleotide molecule. This domain is termed "Nucleotide Recognition Domain 1 beta," or NRD1 beta, since the type of nucleotide is the only common structure among the sugar donors and acceptors. NRD1 beta is present in 140 glycosyltransferases. The central portion of the NRD1 beta domain is very similar to the domain that is present in one family of retaining glycosyltransferases. This family is termed NRD1 alpha to designate the similarity and stereochemistry of sugar transfer, and it consists of 77 glycosyltransferases identified thus far. In the central portion there is a homologous region for these two families and this region probably has a catalytic function. A third conserved domain is found exclusively in membrane-bound glycosyltransferases and is termed NRD2; this domain is present in 98 glycosyltransferases. All three identified NRDs are present in archaebacterial, eubacterial, viral, and eukaryotic glycosyltransferases. The present article presents the alignment of conserved NRD domains and also presents a brief overview of the analyzed glycosyltransferases which comprise about 65% of all known sugar-nucleotide dependent (Leloir-type) and putative glycosyltransferases in different databases. A potential mechanism for the catalytic reaction is also proposed. This proposed mechanism should facilitate the design of experiments to elucidate the regulatory mechanisms of glycosylation reactions. Amino acid sequence information within the conserved domain may be utilized to design degenerate primers for identifying DNA encoding new glycosyltransferases.     

Substrate recognition by β-ketoacyl-ACP synthases

β-Ketoacyl-ACP synthase (KAS) enzymes catalyze Claisen condensation reactions in the fatty acid biosynthesis pathway. These reactions follow a ping-pong mechanism in which a donor substrate acylates the active site cysteine residue after which the acyl group is condensed with the malonyl-ACP acceptor substrate to form a β-ketoacyl-ACP. In the priming KASIII enzymes the donor substrate is an acyl-CoA while in the elongating KASI and KASII enzymes the donor is an acyl-ACP. Although the KASIII enzyme in Escherichia coli (ecFabH) is essential, the corresponding enzyme in Mycobacterium tuberculosis (mtFabH) is not, suggesting that the KASI or II enzyme in M. tuberculosis (KasA or KasB, respectively) must be able to accept a CoA donor substrate. Since KasA is essential, the substrate specificity of this KASI enzyme has been explored using substrates based on phosphopantetheine, CoA, ACP, and AcpM peptide mimics. This analysis has been extended to the KASI and KASII enzymes from E. coli (ecFabB and ecFabF) where we show that a 14-residue malonyl-phosphopantetheine peptide can efficiently replace malonyl-ecACP as the acceptor substrate in the ecFabF reaction. While ecFabF is able to catalyze the condensation reaction when CoA is the carrier for both substrates, the KASI enzymes ecFabB and KasA have an absolute requirement for an ACP substrate as the acyl donor. Provided that this requirement is met, variation in the acceptor carrier substrate has little impact on the k(cat)/K(m) for the KASI reaction. For the KASI enzymes we propose that the binding of ecACP (AcpM) results in a conformational change that leads to an open form of the enzyme to which the malonyl acceptor substrate binds. Finally, the substrate inhibition observed when palmitoyl-CoA is the donor substrate for the KasA reaction has implications for the importance of mtFabH in the mycobacterial FASII pathway.     

Crystal structure-based studies of cytosolic sulfotransferase

Sulfation is a widely observed biological reaction conserved from bacterium to human that plays a key role in various biological processes such as growth, development, and defense against adversities. Deficiencies due to the lack of the ubiquitous sulfate donor 3'-phosphoadenosine-5'-phosphosulfate (PAPS) are lethal in humans. A large group of enzymes called sulfotransferases catalyze the transfer reaction of sulfuryl group of PAPS to the acceptor group of numerous biochemical and xenochemical substrates. Four X-ray crystal structures of sulfotransferases have now been determined: cytosolic estrogen, hydroxysteroid, aryl sulfotransferases, and a sulfotransferase domain of the Golgi-membrane heparan sulfate N-deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase 1. These have revealed the conserved core structure of the PAPS binding site, a common reaction mechanism, and some information concerning the substrate specificity. These crystal structures introduce a new era of the study of the sulfotransferases.     

Enzymatic synthesis of polyprenyl phosphosugars in Salmonella serotype C1

The cell envelopes of serogroup C1 Salmonella, viz. S. thompson and S. montevideo, catalyze the transfer of radiolabeled sugars from UDP-[14C]Glc and UDP-[14C]GlcNAc into the lipid-linked sugars. Using TLC and DEAE-cellulose chromatography, the radiolabeled products were identified as polyprenyl pyrophosphate N-acetylglucosamine (I), polyprenyl monophosphate N-acetylglucosamine and polyprenyl monophosphate glucose. The derivative (I) served as an acceptor for mannose transfer from GDP-Man with formation of Man1-2GlcNAc1PPPre. A similar reaction was observed after addition of synthetic GlcNAc1PPPre to the cell envelopes.     

Distinct substrate specificities and unusual substrate flexibilities of two hydroxycinnamoyltransferases,rosmarinic acid synthase and hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA:shikimate hydroxycinnamoyl-transferase,from <Emphasis Type="Italic">Coleus blumei</Emphasis> Benth.

cDNAs and genes encoding a hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA:hydroxyphenyllactate hydroxycinnamoyltransferase (CbRAS; rosmarinic acid synthase) and a hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA:shikimate hydroxycinnamoyltransferase (CbHST) were isolated from Coleus blumei Benth. (syn. Solenostemon scutellarioides (L.) Codd; Lamiaceae). The proteins were expressed in E. coli and the substrate specificity of both enzymes was tested. CbRAS accepted several CoA-activated phenylpropenoic acids as donor substrates and d-(hydroxy)phenyllactates as acceptors resulting in ester formation while shikimate and quinate were not accepted. Unexpectedly, amino acids (d-phenylalanine, d-tyrosine, d-DOPA) also yielded products, showing that RAS can putatively catalyze amide formation. CbHST was able to transfer cinnamic, 4-coumaric, caffeic, ferulic as well as sinapic acid from CoA to shikimate but not to quinate or acceptor substrates utilized by CbRAS. In addition, 3-hydroxyanthranilate, 3-hydroxybenzoate and 2,3-dihydroxybenzoate were used as acceptor substrates. The reaction product with 3-aminobenzoate putatively is an amide. For both enzymes, structural requirements for donor and acceptor substrates were deduced. The acceptance of unusual acceptor substrates by CbRAS and CbHST resulted in the formation of novel compounds. The rather relaxed substrate as well as reaction specificity of both hydroxycinnamoyltransferases opens up possibilities for the evolution of novel enzymes forming novel secondary metabolites in plants and for the in vitro formation of new compounds with putatively interesting biological activities.     

Structure and function of sulfotransferases

Sulfotransferases (STs) catalyze the transfer reaction of the sulfate group from the ubiquitous donor 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate (PAPS) to an acceptor group of numerous substrates. This reaction, often referred to as sulfuryl transfer, sulfation, or sulfonation, is widely observed from bacteria to humans and plays a key role in various biological processes such as cell communication, growth and development, and defense. The cytosolic STs sulfate small molecules such as steroids, bioamines, and therapeutic drugs, while the Golgi-membrane counterparts sulfate large molecules including glucosaminylglycans and proteins. We have now solved the X-ray crystal structures of four cytosolic and one membrane ST. All five STs are globular proteins composed of a single alpha/beta domain with the characteristic five-stranded beta-sheet. The beta-sheet constitutes the core of the Paps-binding and catalytic sites. Structural analysis of the PAPS-, PAP-, substrate-, and/or orthovanadate (VO(3-)(4))-bound enzymes has also revealed the common molecular mechanism of the transfer reaction catalyzed by sulfotransferses. The X-ray crystal structures have opened a new era for the study of sulfotransferases.     

Mechanism of multiple lysine methylation by the SET domain enzyme Rubisco LSMT

SET domain protein methyltransferases catalyze the transfer of methyl groups from the cofactor S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) to specific lysine residues of protein substrates, such as the N-terminal tails of histones H3 and H4 and the large subunit of the Rubisco holoenzyme complex. The crystal structures of pea Rubisco large subunit methyltransferase (LSMT) in ternary complexes with either lysine or epsilon-N-methyllysine (MeLys) and the product S-adenosylhomocysteine (AdoHcy) were determined to resolutions of 2.65 and 2.55 A, respectively. The zeta-methyl group of MeLys is bound to the enzyme via carbon-oxygen hydrogen bonds that play a key role in catalysis. The methyl donor and acceptor are aligned in a linear geometry for S(N)2 nucleophilic transfer of the methyl group during catalysis. Differences in hydrogen bonding between the MeLys epsilon-amino group and Rubisco LSMT and SET7/9 explain why Rubisco LSMT generates multiply methylated Lys, wheras SET7/9 generates only MeLys.     

The N-acetyl-binding pocket of N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases also accommodates a sugar analog with a chemical handle at C2

In recent years, sugars with a unique chemical handle have been used to detect and elucidate the function of glycoconjugates. Such chemical handles have generally been part of an N-acetyl moiety of a sugar. We have previously developed several applications using the single mutant Y289L-β1,4-galactosyltransferase I (Y289L-β4Gal-T1) and the wild-type polypeptide-α-GalNAc-T enzymes with UDP-C2-keto-Gal. Here, we describe for the first time that the GlcNAc-transferring enzymes-R228K-Y289L-β4Gal-T1 mutant enzyme, the wild-type human β1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-2 and human Maniac Fringe-can also transfer the GlcNAc analog C2-keto-Glc molecule from UDP-C2-keto-Glc to their respective acceptor substrates. Although the R228K-Y289L-β4Gal-T1 mutant enzyme transfers the donor sugar substrate GlcNAc or its analog C2-keto-Glc only to its natural acceptor substrate, GlcNAc, it does not transfer to its analog C2-keto-Glc. Thus, these observations suggest that the GlcNAc-transferring glycosyltransferases can generally accommodate a chemical handle in the N-acetyl-binding cavity of the donor sugar substrate, but not in the N-acetyl-binding cavity of the acceptor sugar.     

Structural evidence of a passive base-flipping mechanism for AGT, an unusual GT-B glycosyltransferase

The Escherichia coli T4 bacteriophage uses two glycosyltransferases to glucosylate and thus protect its DNA: the retaining alpha-glucosyltransferase (AGT) and the inverting beta-glucosyltransferase (BGT). They glucosylate 5-hydroxymethyl cytosine (5-HMC) bases of duplex DNA using UDP-glucose as the sugar donor to form an alpha-glucosidic linkage and a beta-glucosidic linkage, respectively. Five structures of AGT have been determined: a binary complex with the UDP product and four ternary complexes with UDP or UDP-glucose and oligonucleotides containing an A:G, HMU:G (hydroxymethyl uracyl) or AP:G (apurinic/apyrimidinic) mismatch at the target base-pair. AGT adopts the GT-B fold, one of the two folds known for GTs. However, while the sugar donor binding mode is classical for a GT-B enzyme, the sugar acceptor binding mode is unexpected and breaks the established consensus: AGT is the first GT-B enzyme that predominantly binds both the sugar donor and acceptor to the C-terminal domain. Its active site pocket is highly similar to four retaining GT-B glycosyltransferases (trehalose-6-phosphate synthase, glycogen synthase, glycogen and maltodextrin phosphorylases) strongly suggesting a common evolutionary origin and catalytic mechanism for these enzymes. Structure-guided mutagenesis and kinetic analysis do not permit identification of a nucleophile residue responsible for a glycosyl-enzyme intermediate for the classical double displacement mechanism. Interestingly, the DNA structures reveal partially flipped-out bases. They provide evidence for a passive role of AGT in the base-flipping mechanism and for its specific recognition of the acceptor base.     

Evaluation of deoxygenated oligosaccharide acceptor analogs as specific inhibitors of glycosyltransferases

The glycosyltransferases controlling the biosynthesis of cell-surface complex carbohydrates transfer glycosyl residues from sugar nucleotides to specific hydroxyl groups of acceptor oligosaccharides. These enzymes represent prime targets for the design of glycosylation inhibitors with the potential to specifically alter the structures of cell-surface glycoconjugates. With the aim of producing such inhibitors, synthetic oligosaccharide substrates were prepared for eight different glycosyltransferases. The enzymes investigated were: A, alpha(1----2, porcine submaxillary gland); B, alpha(1----3/4, Lewis); C, alpha(1----4, mung bean); D, alpha(1----3, Lex)-fucosyltransferases; E, beta(1----4)-galactosyltransferase; F, beta(1----6)-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase V; G, beta(1----6)-mucin-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase ("core-2" transferase); and H, alpha(2----3)-sialyltransferase from rat liver. These enzymes all transfer sugar residues from their respective sugar nucleotides (GDP-Fuc, UDP-Gal, UDP-GlcNAc, and CMP-sialic acid) with inversion of configuration at their anomeric centers. The Km values for their synthetic oligosaccharide acceptors were in the range of 0.036-1.3 mM. For each of these eight enzymes, acceptor analogs were next prepared where the hydroxyl group undergoing glycosylation was chemically removed and replaced by hydrogen. The resulting deoxygenated acceptor analogs can no longer be substrates for the corresponding glycosyltransferases and, if still bound by the enzymes, should act as competitive inhibitors. In only four of the eight cases examined (enzymes A, C, F, and G) did the deoxygenated acceptor analogs inhibit their target enzymes, and their Ki values (all competitive) remained in the general range of the corresponding acceptor Km values. No inhibition was observed for the remaining four enzymes even at high concentrations of deoxygenated acceptor analog. For these latter enzymes it is suggested that the reactive acceptor hydroxyl groups are involved in a critical hydrogen bond donor interaction with a basic group on the enzyme which removes the developing proton during the glycosyl transfer reaction. Such groups are proposed to represent logical targets for irreversible covalent inactivation of this class of enzyme.     

Modularity of the hydrophobic core and evolution of functional diversity in fold A glycosyltransferases

Hydrophobic cores are fundamental structural properties of proteins typically associated with protein folding and stability; however, how the hydrophobic core shapes protein evolution and function is poorly understood. Here, we investigated the role of conserved hydrophobic cores in fold-A glycosyltransferases (GT-As), a large superfamily of enzymes that catalyze formation of glycosidic linkages between diverse donor and acceptor substrates through distinct catalytic mechanisms (inverting versus retaining). Using hidden Markov models and protein structural alignments, we identify similarities in the phosphate-binding cassette (PBC) of GT-As and unrelated nucleotide-binding proteins, such as UDP-sugar pyrophosphorylases. We demonstrate that GT-As have diverged from other nucleotide-binding proteins through structural elaboration of the PBC and its unique hydrophobic tethering to the F-helix, which harbors the catalytic base (xED-Asp). While the hydrophobic tethering is conserved across diverse GT-A fold enzymes, some families, such as B3GNT2, display variations in tethering interactions and core packing. We evaluated the structural and functional impact of these core variations through experimental mutational analysis and molecular dynamics simulations and find that some of the core mutations (T336I in B3GNT2) increase catalytic efficiency by modulating the conformational occupancy of the catalytic base between “D-in” and acceptor-accessible “D-out” conformation. Taken together, our studies support a model of evolution in which the GT-A core evolved progressively through elaboration upon an ancient PBC found in diverse nucleotide-binding proteins, and malleability of this core provided the structural framework for evolving new catalytic and substrate-binding functions in extant GT-A fold enzymes.     

Directed evolution of a glycosynthase from Agrobacterium sp. increases its catalytic activity dramatically and expands its substrate repertoire

The Agrobacterium sp. beta-glucosidase (Abg) is a retaining beta-glycosidase and its nucleophile mutants, termed Abg glycosynthases, catalyze the formation of glycosidic bonds using alpha-glycosyl fluorides as donor sugars and various aryl glycosides as acceptor sugars. Two rounds of random mutagenesis were performed on the best glycosynthase to date (AbgE358G), and transformants were screened using an on-plate endocellulase coupled assay. Two highly active mutants were obtained, 1D12 (A19T, E358G) and 2F6 (A19T, E358G, Q248R, M407V) in the first and second rounds, respectively. Relative catalytic efficiencies (kcat/Km) of 1:7:27 were determined for AbgE358G, 1D12, and 2F6, respectively, using alpha-D-galactopyranosyl fluoride and 4-nitrophenyl beta-D-glucopyranoside as substrates. The 2F6 mutant is not only more efficient but also has an expanded repertoire of acceptable substrates. Analysis of a homology model structure of 2F6 indicated that the A19T and M407V mutations do not interact directly with substrates but exert their effects by changing the conformation of the active site. Much of the improvement associated with the A19T mutation seems to be caused by favorable interactions with the equatorial C2-hydroxyl group of the substrate. The alteration of torsional angles of Glu-411, Trp-412, and Trp-404, which are components of the aglycone (+1) subsite, is an expected consequence of the A19T and M407V mutations based on the homology model structure of 2F6.