Molecular insights into RBR E3 ligase ubiquitin transfer mechanisms

RING‐in‐between‐RING (RBR) ubiquitin (Ub) ligases are a distinct class of E3s, defined by a RING1 domain that binds E2 Ub‐conjugating enzyme and a RING2 domain that contains an active site cysteine similar to HECT‐type E3s. Proposed to function as RING/HECT hybrids, details regarding the Ub transfer mechanism used by RBRs have yet to be defined. When paired with RING‐type E3s, E2s perform the final step of Ub ligation to a substrate. In contrast, when paired with RBR E3s, E2s must transfer Ub onto the E3 to generate a E3~Ub intermediate. We show that RBRs utilize two strategies to ensure transfer of Ub from the E2 onto the E3 active site. First, RING1 domains of HHARI and RNF144 promote open E2~Ubs. Second, we identify a Ub‐binding site on HHARI RING2 important for its recruitment to RING1‐bound E2~Ub. Mutations that ablate Ub binding to HHARI RING2 also decrease RBR ligase activity, consistent with RING2 recruitment being a critical step for the RBR Ub transfer mechanism. Finally, we demonstrate that the mechanism defined here is utilized by a variety of RBRs.     

LUBAC synthesizes linear ubiquitin chains via a thioester intermediate

The linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex (LUBAC) is a RING E3 ligase that regulates immune and inflammatory signalling pathways. Unlike classical RING E3 ligases, LUBAC determines the type of ubiquitin chain being formed, an activity normally associated with the E2 enzyme. We show that the RING-in-between-RING (RBR)-containing region of HOIP-the catalytic subunit of LUBAC-is sufficient to generate linear ubiquitin chains. However, this activity is inhibited by the N-terminal portion of the molecule, an inhibition that is released upon complex formation with HOIL-1L or SHARPIN. Furthermore, we demonstrate that HOIP transfers ubiquitin to the substrate through a thioester intermediate formed by a conserved cysteine in the RING2 domain, supporting the notion that RBR ligases act as RING/HECT hybrids.     

TRIAD1 and HHARI bind to and are activated by distinct neddylated Cullin‐RING ligase complexes

RING (Really Interesting New Gene)‐in‐between‐RING (RBR) enzymes are a distinct class of E3 ubiquitin ligases possessing a cluster of three zinc‐binding domains that cooperate to catalyse ubiquitin transfer. The regulation and biological function for most members of the RBR ligases is not known, and all RBR E3s characterized to date are auto‐inhibited for in vitro ubiquitylation. Here, we show that TRIAD1 and HHARI, two members of the Ariadne subfamily ligases, associate with distinct neddylated Cullin‐RING ligase (CRL) complexes. In comparison to the modest E3 ligase activity displayed by isolated TRIAD1 or HHARI, binding of the cognate neddylated CRL to TRIAD1 or HHARI greatly stimulates RBR ligase activity in vitro, as determined by auto‐ubiquitylation, their ability to stimulate dissociation of a thioester‐linked UBCH7～ubiquitin intermediate, and reactivity with ubiquitin‐vinyl methyl ester. Moreover, genetic evidence shows that RBR ligase activity impacts both the levels and activities of neddylated CRLs in vivo. Cumulatively, our work proposes a conserved mechanism of CRL‐induced Ariadne RBR ligase activation and further suggests a reciprocal role of this special class of RBRs as regulators of distinct CRLs.     

RBR E3‐ligases at work

The RING‐in‐between‐RING (RBR) E3s are a curious family of ubiquitin E3‐ligases, whose mechanism of action is unusual in several ways. Their activities are auto‐inhibited, causing a requirement for activation by protein‐protein interactions or posttranslational modifications. They catalyse ubiquitin conjugation by a concerted RING/HECT‐like mechanism in which the RING1 domain facilitates E2‐discharge to directly form a thioester intermediate with a cysteine in RING2. This short‐lived, HECT‐like intermediate then modifies the target. Uniquely, the RBR ligase HOIP makes use of this mechanism to target the ubiquitin amino‐terminus, by presenting the target ubiquitin for modification using its distinctive LDD region.     

Control of the olive fruit fly using genetics-enhanced sterile insect technique

Ubiquitin signaling pathways rely on E3 ligases for effecting the final transfer of ubiquitin from E2 ubiquitin conjugating enzymes to a protein target. Here we re-evaluate the hybrid RING/HECT mechanism used by the E3 family RING-between-RINGs (RBRs) to transfer ubiquitin to substrates. We place RBRs into the context of current knowledge of HECT and RING E3s. Although not as abundant as the other types of E3s (there are only slightly more than a dozen RBR E3s in the human genome), RBRs are conserved in all eukaryotes and play important roles in biology. Re-evaluation of RBR ligases as RING/HECT E3s provokes new questions and challenges the field.     

Different HECT domain ubiquitin ligases employ distinct mechanisms of polyubiquitin chain synthesis

Individual ubiquitin (Ub)-protein ligases (E3s) cooperate with specific Ub-conjugating enzymes (E2s) to modify cognate substrates with polyubiquitin chains. E3s belonging to the Really Interesting New Gene (RING) and Homologous to E6-Associated Protein (E6AP) C-Terminus (HECT) domain families utilize distinct molecular mechanisms. In particular, HECT E3s, but not RING E3s, form a thiol ester with Ub before transferring Ub to the substrate lysine. Here we report that different HECT domain E3s can employ distinct mechanisms of polyubiquitin chain synthesis. We show that E6AP builds up a K48-linked chain on its HECT cysteine residue, while KIAA10 builds up K48- and K29-linked chains as free entities. A small region near the N-terminus of the conserved HECT domain helps to bring about this functional distinction. Thus, a given HECT domain can specify both the linkage of a polyubiquitin chain and the mechanism of its assembly.     

A Structural Element within the HUWE1 HECT Domain Modulates Self-ubiquitination and Substrate Ubiquitination Activities

E3 ubiquitin ligases catalyze the final step of ubiquitin conjugation and regulate numerous cellular processes. The HECT class of E3 ubiquitin (Ub) ligases directly transfers Ub from bound E2 enzyme to a myriad of substrates. The catalytic domain of HECT Ub ligases has a bilobal architecture that separates the E2 binding region and catalytic site. An important question regarding HECT domain function is the control of ligase activity and specificity. Here we present a functional analysis of the HECT domain of the E3 ligase HUWE1 based on crystal structures and show that a single N-terminal helix significantly stabilizes the HECT domain. We observe that this element modulates HECT domain activity, as measured by self-ubiquitination induced in the absence of this helix, as distinct from its effects on Ub conjugation of substrate Mcl-1. Such subtle changes to the protein may be at the heart of the vast spectrum of substrate specificities displayed by HECT domain E3 ligases.     

Parkin mitochondrial translocation is achieved through a novel catalytic activity coupled mechanism

Pink1, a mitochondrial kinase, and Parkin, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, function in mitochondrial maintenance. Pink1 accumulates on depolarized mitochondria, where it recruits Parkin to mainly induce K63-linked chain ubiquitination of outer membrane proteins and eventually mitophagy. Parkin belongs to the RBR E3 ligase family. Recently, it has been proposed that the RBR domain transfers ubiquitin to targets via a cysteine∼ubiquitin enzyme intermediate, in a manner similar to HECT domain E3 ligases. However, direct evidence for a ubiquitin transfer mechanism and its importance for Parkin''s in vivo function is still missing. Here, we report that Parkin E3 activity relies on cysteine-mediated ubiquitin transfer during mitophagy. Mutating the putative catalytic cysteine to serine (Parkin C431S) traps ubiquitin, and surprisingly, also abrogates Parkin mitochondrial translocation, indicating that E3 activity is essential for Parkin translocation. We found that Parkin can bind to K63-linked ubiquitin chains, and that targeting K63-mimicking ubiquitin chains to mitochondria restores Parkin C431S localization. We propose that Parkin translocation is achieved through a novel catalytic activity coupled mechanism.     

Activation of UBC5 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme by the RING finger of ROC1 and assembly of active ubiquitin ligases by all cullins

Protein ubiquitination plays an important role in regulating the abundance and conformation of a broad range of eukaryotic proteins. This process involves a cascade of enzymes including ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1), ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2), and ubiquitin ligases (E3). E1 and E2 represent two families of structurally related proteins and are relatively well characterized. In contrast, the nature and mechanism of E3, proposed to contain activities in catalyzing isopeptide bond formation (ubiquitin ligation) and substrate targeting, remains inadequately understood. Two major families of E3 ubiquitin ligases, the HECT (for homologous to E6-AP C terminus) family and the RING family, have been identified that utilize distinct mechanisms in promoting isopeptide bond formation. Here, we showed that purified RING finger domain of ROC1, an essential subunit of SKP1-cullin/CDC53-F box protein ubiquitin ligases, was sufficient to activate UBCH5c to synthesize polyubiquitin chains. The sequence flanking the RING finger in ROC1 did not contribute to UBCH5c activation, but was required for binding with CUL1. We demonstrated that all cullins, through their binding with ROC proteins, constituted active ubiquitin ligases, suggesting the existence in vivo of a large number of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases. These results are consistent with the notion that the RING finger domains allosterically activate E2. We suggest that RING-E2, rather than cullin-RING, constitutes the catalytic core of the ubiquitin ligase and that one major function of the cullin subunit is to assemble the RING-E2 catalytic core and substrates together.     

RING‐between‐RINGs—keeping the safety on loaded guns

EMBO J (2012) 31 19, 3833–3844 doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.217; published online September072012EMBO Rep (2012) 13 9, 840–846 doi:10.1038/embor.2012.105; published online September072012The ‘RING-between-RING''-type E3 ubiquitin ligase HOIP acts via a novel RING/HECT-hybrid ubiquitin transfer mechanism and catalyses the formation of linear ubiquitin chains by non-covalently binding the acceptor ubiquitin. But in the absence of a binding partner, HOIP is auto-inhibited. This explains why assembly of either HOIP/HOIL-1L or HOIP/SHARPIN is required to catalyse linear chain formation.Post-translational modification of a protein with Ubiquitin (Ub) requires the activity of three enzymes: a Ub activating enzyme (E1), a Ub conjugating enzyme (E2), and a Ub ligase (E3). Final Ub transfer is performed by an E3 enzyme, which mediates the ligation of Ub from an E2∼Ub conjugate (‘∼'' denotes a thioester) onto a substrate. E3s are commonly divided into two mechanistic classes: RING/U-box E3s and HECT E3s. RING/U-box E3s facilitate the transfer of Ub from the E2∼Ub directly onto a substrate amino group. In contrast, HECTs transfer Ub from the E2∼Ub to the substrate via a HECT∼Ub intermediate. This mechanistic difference leads to an important distinction regarding what determines the type of Ub product (i.e., the specific Ub-chain linkage) formed: in ubiquitination pathways involving RING-type E3 ligases, the E2 determines the product formed, whereas for HECT-catalysed pathways, the E3 governs product formation (Christensen et al, 2007; Kim and Huibregtse, 2009).RING-between-RING (RBR) E3s comprise a class of E3s that appear to have special properties. Although RBR E3s have been considered as a subfamily of RING E3s, the RBR E3 HHARI (Human Homologue of ARIadne) was recently shown to form a HECT-like E3∼Ub intermediate (Wenzel et al, 2011). Two other members of the RBR family, HOIL-1 and HOIP, form the Linear Ub Chain Assembly Complex (LUBAC), the only E3 ligase known to catalyse the synthesis of linear Ub chains (Kirisako et al, 2006). Linear Ub chains are produced by head-to-tail conjugation of Ub molecules through their N- and C-termini and have been shown to activate the canonical NF-κB pathway (Tokunaga et al, 2009).Two studies by the Rittinger and Sixma groups now reveal important insights regarding the formation of linear Ub chains by the dimeric RBR E3 complex HOIP/HOIL-1L (Smit et al, 2012; Stieglitz et al, 2012). Results from these studies highlight three emerging themes among RBR ligases: a RING/HECT-hybrid Ub transfer mechanism; auto-inhibition of RBR E3 activity, and a role for E3:Ub interactions.The RBR E3 ligase domain consists of two distinct RING domains, called RING1 and RING2, connected by an IBR (In-Between-Ring) domain. Despite its name, RING2 is not a canonical RING domain as it contains an active site Cysteine (Cys), which has recently been shown to form a thioester E3∼Ub intermediate, as directly detected for the RBR E3 HHARI. Although the Ub-loaded species could not be detected for the RBR E3 parkin, mutation of the analogous cysteine residue abrogated parkin''s ligase activity implying that it works via the same mechanism. On the basis of these observations, Wenzel et al (2011) proposed that the RBR E3s are a family of RING/HECT hybrids that use RING1 to bind an E2 (RING-like) and RING2 to present the active site Cys (HECT-like) as shown schematically in Figure 1. Both Smit et al (2012) and Stieglitz et al (2012) observed a HOIP∼Ub thioester, confirming that HOIP also acts via a RING/HECT-hybrid mechanism. Furthermore, Smit et al (2012) used a clever strategy to uncouple the first transfer event (E2∼Ub to E3) from the final transfer event (E3∼Ub to substrate Ub) to verify that the E3∼Ub intermediate is a prerequisite for Ub transfer onto a substrate and not just a serendipitous side product. The results extend the number of RBR E3s for which a thioester intermediate has been observed and support the notion that RBR E3s are indeed RING/HECT hybrids.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Three common themes are emerging among RBR ligases: a RING/HECT-hybrid Ub transfer mechanism; auto-inhibition of RBR E3 activity, and a role for E3:Ub interactions. RBR E3s are characterized by their RBR domain that consists of two distinct RING domains, RING1 that binds the E2, and RING2 that harbours the active site Cys. Two new studies on the RBR E3 HOIP show that (a) domain(s) in HOIP''s N-terminal region inhibits its ligase activity and (b) a domain C-terminal to HOIP''s RBR binds and orients an acceptor Ub to direct linear Ub-chain formation (‘Linear Ub chain Determining Domain'' or LDD). (A)Three ways in which auto-inhibition might occur are illustrated: (1) inhibition of E2∼Ub binding by RING1, (2) obstruction of the active site cysteine on RING2, and/or (3) occlusion of acceptor Ub binding on the LDD. (B) A possible flow of events that occur once auto-inhibition released is shown. Details of each step and how specifically auto-inhibition is released are still unknown.Previous studies have established that HOIP Ub ligase activity and subsequent activation of NF-κB require either the RBR-containing protein, HOIL-1L, or SHARPIN, an adaptor protein associated with LUBAC (Ikeda et al, 2011; Tokunaga et al, 2011). The two current studies now show that although full-length HOIP exhibits very low activity on its own, removal of the N-terminal ∼700 residues results in robust ligase activity. Thus, HOIP appears to be auto-inhibited in the absence of a binding partner. Further analysis revealed that HOIP''s UBA (Ub-Associated) domain is partly responsible for auto-inhibition, although additional N-terminal domains appear to have auto-inhibitory effects as well. SHARPIN, which contains a UBL (Ub-Like) domain, can relieve auto-inhibition of HOIP. Similarly, the addition of the HOIL-1L UBL domain, previously shown to interact with the HOIP UBA domain (Yagi et al, 2012), relieves inhibition. Interestingly, the addition of full-length HOIL-1L results in even greater ubiquitination activity.Stieglitz et al (2012) show that the RBR E3 HOIL-1L has very low E3 activity on its own. Intriguingly, they found that mutation of the HOIL-1L RING2 active site Cys (C460A) reduced activity of the HOIP/HOIL-1L complex back to levels comparable to HOIP activity in presence of HOIL UBL alone. This suggests a more active, catalytic role for HOIL-1L in linear Ub-chain formation than previously appreciated. The details regarding this role must await further studies, but involvement of an active site Cys residue on a second RING2 domain suggests a possible reciprocal transfer mechanism. Perhaps linear chains can be pre-built via such a mechanism and passed en bloc to substrate, similarly to mechanisms used by some HECT-type bacterial E3 ligases (Levin et al, 2010).Parkin, another RBR E3, also exhibits auto-inhibition (Chaugule et al, 2011), but the auto-inhibitory mechanism and the release thereof differ from HOIP. Unlike parkin''s N-terminal UBL, which is thought to interact within the RBR domain at RING2, HOIP''s UBA does not bind detectably in trans to any region in the RBR domain (Stieglitz et al, 2012). Furthermore, addition of its UBA in trans does not inhibit the activity of HOIP RBR E3 as was seen with parkin and its UBL domain. The auto-inhibition of parkin is likely released by substrate binding, because addition of either the UIM of Eps15 or the SH3 domain of endophilin-A, both known to bind the parkin UBL, can restore the activity of parkin (Chaugule et al, 2011). In addition, phosphorylation of Ser65 within the UBL of parkin by PINK-1 activates parkin, presumably by releasing the UBL from RING2 (Kondapalli et al, 2012). In contrast, HOIP overcomes its auto-inhibition through binding either HOIL-1L or SHARPIN. There is no additive effect when both binding partners are present, consistent with the notion that both proteins act via their UBL domains, although this remains to be demonstrated for SHARPIN. The activity of either SHARPIN/HOIP or HOIL-1L/HOIP can activate NF-κB (Ikeda et al, 2011; Tokunaga et al, 2011), but how the protein complexes differ in their cellular roles remains to be further analysed.The finding that HOIP and parkin exhibit auto-inhibition raises the question whether there is something special about the RBR E3s that require auto-inhibition. In this regard, we note that RBR E3s bind the E2 UbcH7 with significantly tighter affinity than canonical RING E3s bind their E2s (Dove and Klevit, unpublished). In the absence of a substrate, RING1 loaded with UbcH7∼Ub would lead to non-productive transfer of Ub from UbcH7∼Ub to the active site of RING2. Occlusion of the active site by auto-inhibition may therefore act as a safety check until its activity is required for transfer of Ub to a substrate. As yet, there is no evidence to indicate whether substrate binding will release HOIP auto-inhibition, as it does for parkin, but this remains a possibility.The revelation that removal of all domains N-terminal to the HOIP RING1 domain yields a highly active ligase allowed both groups to explore questions pertaining to how linear chains are built. Remarkably, constructs comprised of only the RBR domain through the C-terminus of HOIP are sufficient to specify linear Ub chains. (The two groups use HOIP constructs that differ by only two N-terminal residues (697/699–1072) but Stieglitz et al call their construct RBR whereas Smit et al call it RBR-LDD.) (Smit et al, 2012; Stieglitz et al, 2012). Smit et al (2012) demonstrate that the region immediately C-terminal to RING2 is required for linear chain building activity and name the region the ‘LDD'' (Linear Ub chain Determining Domain). Their results indicate that the LDD binds and orients the acceptor Ub to promote transfer of the donor Ub from the RING2 active site to the N-terminus of the acceptor Ub (Figure 1). Parkin has also been suggested to bind free Ub. Details about whether parkin binds acceptor or donor Ub and whether Ub binding determines Ub-chain specificity are still unknown.There is precedence for acceptor Ub binding by HECT E3s and this interaction is essential for chain formation by NEDD4 and its yeast orthologue Rsp5 (Kim et al, 2011; Maspero et al, 2011). In another example, the inactive E2 variant MMS2 binds an acceptor Ub and orients the Ub-Lys63 into the active site of Ubc13 thereby guaranteeing K63-linked chain formation by the E2 (Eddins et al, 2006). Besides proper orientation of the acceptor Ub, chemical differences between α- and ɛ-amino groups likely contribute to linear Ub-chain specificity. For example, E2s known to be active with RING-type E3s can transfer Ub onto the amino acid lysine, but not the other amino acids containing α-amino groups indicating specificity towards the ɛ-amino of lysine (Wenzel et al, 2011).Catalysed by the unexpected discovery that HHARI is a HECT/RING hybrid E3, details about how the RBR class of E3s function are beginning to emerge. We now know, either directly or indirectly, that at least 4 RBR E3s of the 13 identified in humans (HHARI, HOIL, HOIP, and parkin) require a trans-thiolation event using an active site cysteine within RING2. Conservation of this cysteine among all RBR E3s strongly suggests that the RING/HECT-hybrid mechanism is conserved and therefore defines the class. The hybrid mechanism also offers an explanation for the heretofore puzzling observation that, despite being categorized as a RING E3, HOIP determines the type of Ub chain formed. The ability to bind an acceptor Ub close to the RING2 active site likely contributes to how the RBR E3s dictate the type of product they produce. Finally, both HOIP and parkin are auto-inhibited. It remains to be seen whether HOIP''s auto-inhibitory domains work via inhibition of E2∼Ub binding by RING1, obstruction of the active site cysteine on RING2, and/or occlusion of acceptor Ub binding on the LDD (Figure 1). Regardless of the mechanistic details, the ability to modulate their activity may be a common trait of the RBR E3s. Given recent rapid progress, our understanding of this special class of E3s will continue to grow apace.     

Role of the RING-CH Domain of Viral Ligase mK3 in Ubiquitination of Non-Lysine and Lysine MHC I Residues

A plethora of ubiquitin ligases determine the intracellular location and fate of numerous proteins in a substrate-specific manner. However, the mechanisms for these functions are incompletely understood. Most ligases have structurally related RING domains that are critical for ligase activity including the recruitment of ubiquitin conjugating enzymes. Here we probe the function of the RING-CH domain of murine γ-herpesvirus-68 ligase mK3 that functions as an immune evasin by targeting major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I heavy chains for endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation (ERAD). Interestingly, mK3 mediates ubiquitin conjugation via ester bonds to S or T residues in addition to conventional isopeptide linkages to K residues. To determine the mechanism of non-K ubiquitination of substrates, we introduced into an mK3 background the RING-CH domains of related viral and cellular MARCH ( m embrane a ssociated R ING- CH ) ligases. We found that although a conserved W present in all viral RING-CH domains is critical for mK3 function, sequences outside the RING-CH domain determine whether and which non-lysine substrate residues can be ubiquitinated by mK3. Our findings support the model that viral ligases have evolved a highly effective strategy to optimally orient their RING domain with substrate allowing them to ubiquitinate non-K residues.     

RINGs hold the key to ubiquitin transfer

Ubiquitylation, the covalent modification of proteins by the addition of ubiquitin, relies on a cascade of enzymes that culminates in an E3 ligase that promotes the transfer of ubiquitin from an E2 enzyme to the target protein. The most prevalent E3 ligases contain a type of zinc-finger domain called RING, and although an essential role for the RING domain in ubiquitin transfer is widely accepted, the molecular mechanism by which this is achieved remains uncertain. In this review, we highlight recent studies that have suggested that the RING domain modulates the stability of the E2-ubiquitin conjugate so that catalysis is promoted. We also review the role of RING dimerisation and emphasise the importance of studying RING domains in the context of the full-length protein.     

U box proteins as a new family of ubiquitin-protein ligases.

The U box is a domain of approximately 70 amino acids that is present in proteins from yeast to humans. The prototype U box protein, yeast Ufd2, was identified as a ubiquitin chain assembly factor that cooperates with a ubiquitin-activating enzyme (E1), a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2), and a ubiquitin-protein ligase (E3) to catalyze ubiquitin chain formation on artificial substrates. E3 enzymes are thought to determine the substrate specificity of ubiquitination and have been classified into two families, the HECT and RING finger families. Six mammalian U box proteins have now been shown to mediate polyubiquitination in the presence of E1 and E2 and in the absence of E3. These U box proteins exhibited different specificities for E2 enzymes in this reaction. Deletion of the U box or mutation of conserved amino acids within it abolished ubiquitination activity. Some U box proteins catalyzed polyubiquitination by targeting lysine residues of ubiquitin other than lysine 48, which is utilized by HECT and RING finger E3 enzymes for polyubiquitination that serves as a signal for proteolysis by the 26 S proteasome. These data suggest that U box proteins constitute a third family of E3 enzymes and that E4 activity may reflect a specialized type of E3 activity.     

New classes of E3 ligases illuminated by chemical probes

Specificity in the ubiquitin system depends on E3 ligases, largely belonging to a handful of families discovered more than a decade ago. However, the last two years brought a quantum leap in the identification and/or mechanistic characterization of eukaryotic ubiquitin ligases, in part through implementation of activity-based chemical probes and cryo-EM. Here, we survey recent discoveries of RING-Cys-Relay, RZ-finger, and neddylated cullin–RING–ARIH RBR E3–E3 ubiquitin ligase mechanisms. These ligases transfer ubiquitin through unprecedented mechanisms—via novel catalytic domains or domain combinations—and collectively modify unconventional amino acids, non-proteinaceous bacterial lipid targets, and structurally-diverse substrates recruited to numerous cullin–RING ligases. We anticipate major expansion of the types, features, and mechanisms of E3 ligases will emerge from such chemical and structural approaches in the coming years.     

Fission yeast Dma1 requires RING domain dimerization for its ubiquitin ligase activity and mitotic checkpoint function

In fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe), the E3 ubiquitin ligase Dma1 delays cytokinesis if chromosomes are not properly attached to the mitotic spindle. Dma1 contains a C-terminal RING domain, and we have found that the Dma1 RING domain forms a stable homodimer. Although the RING domain is required for dimerization, residues in the C-terminal tail are also required to help form or stabilize the dimeric structure because mutation of specific residues in this region disrupts Dma1 dimerization. Further analyses showed that Dma1 dimerization is required for proper localization at spindle pole bodies and the cell division site, E3 ligase activity, and mitotic checkpoint function. Thus, Dma1 forms an obligate dimer via its RING domain, which is essential for efficient transfer of ubiquitin to its substrate(s). This study further supports the mechanistic paradigm that many RING E3 ligases function as RING dimers.     

U-box泛素连接酶调控植物抗逆和生长发育

泛素化是真核生物蛋白质转录后修饰的重要方式之一。泛素连接酶决定了泛素化过程底物的特异性, 在植物抗病、抗旱、耐盐、抗寒和生长发育各个阶段都发挥重要作用。泛素连接酶包括RING、U-box、HECT和F-box四大类。该文对U-box泛素连接酶在植物抗逆和生长发育过程中的作用进行了总结, 并对今后的研究提出了建议, 以期为进一步了解植物泛素化调控通路提供依据。     

Selective recruitment of an E2~ubiquitin complex by an E3 ubiquitin ligase

RING E3 ligases are proteins that must selectively recruit an E2-conjugating enzyme and facilitate ubiquitin transfer to a substrate. It is not clear how a RING E3 ligase differentiates a naked E2 enzyme from the E2∼ubiquitin-conjugated form or how this is altered upon ubiquitin transfer. RING-box protein 1 (Rbx1/ROC1) is a key protein found in the Skp1/Cullin-1/F-box (SCF) E3 ubiquitin ligase complex that functions with the E2 ubiquitin conjugating enzyme CDC34. The solution structure of Rbx1/ROC1 revealed a globular RING domain (residues 40–108) stabilized by three structural zinc ions (root mean square deviation 0.30 ± 0.04 Å) along with a disordered N terminus (residues 12–39). Titration data showed that Rbx1/ROC1 preferentially recruits CDC34 in its ubiquitin-conjugated form and favors this interaction by 50-fold compared with unconjugated CDC34. Furthermore, NMR and biochemical assays identified residues in helix α2 of Rbx1/ROC1 that are essential for binding and activating CDC34∼ubiquitin for ubiquitylation. Taken together, this work provides the first direct structural and biochemical evidence showing that polyubiquitylation by the RING E3 ligase Rbx1/ROC1 requires the preferential recruitment of an E2∼ubiquitin complex and subsequent release of the unconjugated E2 protein upon ubiquitin transfer to a substrate or ubiquitin chain.     

Regulation of Nedd4-2 self-ubiquitination and stability by a PY motif located within its HECT-domain

Ubiquitin ligases play a pivotal role in substrate recognition and ubiquitin transfer, yet little is known about the regulation of their catalytic activity. Nedd4 (neural-precursor-cell-expressed, developmentally down-regulated 4)-2 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase composed of a C2 domain, four WW domains (protein-protein interaction domains containing two conserved tryptophan residues) that bind PY motifs (L/PPXY) and a ubiquitin ligase HECT (homologous with E6-associated protein C-terminus) domain. In the present paper we show that the WW domains of Nedd4-2 bind (weakly) to a PY motif (LPXY) located within its own HECT domain and inhibit auto-ubiquitination. Pulse-chase experiments demonstrated that mutation of the HECT PY-motif decreases the stability of Nedd4-2, suggesting that it is involved in stabilization of this E3 ligase. Interestingly, the HECT PY-motif mutation does not affect ubiquitination or down-regulation of a known Nedd4-2 substrate, ENaC (epithelial sodium channel). ENaC ubiquitination, in turn, appears to promote Nedd4-2 self-ubiquitination. These results support a model in which the inter- or intra-molecular WW-domain-HECT PY-motif interaction stabilizes Nedd4-2 by preventing self-ubiquitination. Substrate binding disrupts this interaction, allowing self-ubiquitination of Nedd4-2 and subsequent degradation, resulting in down-regulation of Nedd4-2 once it has ubiquitinated its target. These findings also point to a novel mechanism employed by a ubiquitin ligase to regulate itself differentially compared with substrate ubiquitination and stability.     

The ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes UbcH7 and UbcH8 interact with RING finger/IBR motif-containing domains of HHARI and H7-AP1.

Ubiquitinylation of proteins appears to be mediated by the specific interplay between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s) and ubiquitin-protein ligases (E3s). However, cognate E3s and/or substrate proteins have been identified for only a few E2s. To identify proteins that can interact with the human E2 UbcH7, a yeast two-hybrid screen was performed. Two proteins were identified and termed human homologue of Drosophila ariadne (HHARI) and UbcH7-associated protein (H7-AP1). Both proteins, which are widely expressed, are characterized by the presence of RING finger and in between RING fingers (IBR) domains. No other overt structural similarity was observed between the two proteins. In vitro binding studies revealed that an N-terminal RING finger motif (HHARI) and the IBR domain (HHARI and H7-AP1) are involved in the interaction of these proteins with UbcH7. Furthermore, binding of these two proteins to UbcH7 is specific insofar that both HHARI and H7-AP1 can bind to the closely related E2, UbcH8, but not to the unrelated E2s UbcH5 and UbcH1. Although it is not clear at present whether HHARI and H7-AP1 serve, for instance, as substrates for UbcH7 or represent proteins with E3 activity, our data suggests that a subset of RING finger/IBR proteins are functionally linked to the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway.