Xrs2, a DNA Repair Gene of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae, Is Needed for Meiotic Recombination

The XRS2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been previously identified as a DNA repair gene. In this communication, we show that XRS2 also encodes an essential meiotic function. Spore inviability of xrs2 strains is rescued by a spo13 mutation, but meiotic recombination (both gene conversion and crossing over) is highly depressed in spo13 xrs2 diploids. The xrs2 mutation suppresses spore inviability of a spo13 rad52 strain suggesting that XRS2 acts prior to RAD52 in the meiotic recombination pathway. In agreement with the genetic data, meiosis-specific double-strand breaks at the ARG4 meiotic recombination hotspot are not detected in xrs2 strains. Despite its effects on meiotic recombination, the xrs2 mutation does not prevent mitotic recombination events, including homologous integration of linear DNA, mating-type switching and radiation-induced gene conversion. Moreover, xrs2 strains display a mitotic hyper-rec phenotype. Haploid xrs2 cells fail to carry out G2-repair of gamma-induced lesions, whereas xrs2 diploids are able to perform some diploid-specific repair of these lesions. Meiotic and mitotic phenotypes of xrs2 cells are very similar to those of rad50 cells suggesting that XRS2 is involved in homologous recombination in a way analogous to that of RAD50.     

Replication Protein A (RPA1a) Is Required for Meiotic and Somatic DNA Repair But Is Dispensable for DNA Replication and Homologous Recombination in Rice

Replication protein A (RPA), a highly conserved single-stranded DNA-binding protein in eukaryotes, is a stable complex comprising three subunits termed RPA1, RPA2, and RPA3. RPA is required for multiple processes in DNA metabolism such as replication, repair, and homologous recombination in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and human. Most eukaryotic organisms, including fungi, insects, and vertebrates, have only a single RPA gene that encodes each RPA subunit. Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and rice (Oryza sativa), however, possess multiple copies of an RPA gene. Rice has three paralogs each of RPA1 and RPA2, and one for RPA3. Previous studies have established their biochemical interactions in vitro and in vivo, but little is known about their exact function in rice. We examined the function of OsRPA1a in rice using a T-DNA insertional mutant. The osrpa1a mutants had a normal phenotype during vegetative growth but were sterile at the reproductive stage. Cytological examination confirmed that no embryo sac formed in female meiocytes and that abnormal chromosomal fragmentation occurred in male meiocytes after anaphase I. Compared with wild type, the osrpa1a mutant showed no visible defects in mitosis and chromosome pairing and synapsis during meiosis. In addition, the osrpa1a mutant was hypersensitive to ultraviolet-C irradiation and the DNA-damaging agents mitomycin C and methyl methanesulfonate. Thus, our data suggest that OsRPA1a plays an essential role in DNA repair but may not participate in, or at least is dispensable for, DNA replication and homologous recombination in rice.In a population of organisms, it is crucial to maintain the integrity of genome among individuals as well as shuffle genetic information at the population level. To maintain such genetic integrity, cells have evolved elaborate mechanisms such as base excision repair (BER; Hegde et al., 2008), nucleotide excision repair (NER; Shuck et al., 2008), homologous recombination (HR; Li and Heyer, 2008) repair, and nonhomologous end joining (Weterings and Chen, 2008) pathways to repair diverse types of DNA damage. To allow for variation, however, organisms utilize meiosis to shuffle genetic material so as to increase genetic diversity in populations and in the species.DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair is particularly important in maintaining the integrity of genome among individuals and shuffling genetic information among population, because DSBs are generated not only in meiotic cells but also from the action of certain endogenous or exogenous DNA-damaging agents and during repair of other kinds of DNA lesions by NER or BER (West et al., 2004; Bleuyard et al., 2006). The past decade has witnessed an explosion in understanding of this complex process by using yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a model organism (Aylon and Kupiec, 2004). Cells can repair DSBs by the relatively inaccurate process of rejoining the two broken ends directly (i.e. nonhomologous end joining) or much more accurately by HR (Bleuyard et al., 2006; Wyman and Kanaar, 2006). These two pathways appear to compete for DSBs, but the balance between them differs widely among species, between different cell types of a single species, and during different cell cycle phases of a single cell type (Shrivastav et al., 2008). According to the current general model for meiotic DSB repair (Bishop and Zickler, 2004; Ma, 2006; San Filippo et al., 2008), when DSBs occur the MRN complex (composed of Mre11, Rad50, and NBS1) resects the DSBs to generate 5′→3′ single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) ends. Subsequently, the replication protein A (RPA) protein complex binds to the ssDNA ends to protect them from attack by endogenous exonucleases; then, in concert with catalysis by Rad52, Rad55, and Rad57, the recombinase Rad51 displaces RPA, resulting in the generation of a Rad51 nucleoprotein filament that in turn catalyzes the search and invasion into the recombination partner with the help of proteins belonging to the RAD52 epistasis group to form a D loop that accompanies DNA synthesis. Thereafter, at least two competing mechanisms may come into play. One is the DSB repair pathway, in which the capture of the second DSB end and additional DNA synthesis result in an intermediate that harbors two Holliday junctions. The subsequent resolution of Holliday junctions results in the formation of crossovers. Alternatively, in the synthesis-dependent strand annealing pathway, the D loop dissociates and the invading single strand with newly synthesized DNA reanneals with the other DSB end, followed by gap-filling DNA synthesis and ligation, forming only noncrossover products (Ma, 2006; San Filippo et al., 2008).RPA is comprised of three subunits of RPA1, 2, and 3, alternatively termed as RPA70, 32, and 14, respectively, according to their apparent M_rs (Wold, 1997; Iftode et al., 1999). RPA is an essential protein in various DNA metabolism pathways such as DNA replication, repair, and HR (Wold, 1997; Iftode et al., 1999). In these pathways, the most basic function of RPA is binding to ssDNA to protect it from exonucleases, and its general roles in DNA metabolism depend on its interactions with other proteins in various pathways (Wold, 1997; Iftode et al., 1999). For example, in human NER pathway, RPA binds to damaged DNA and interacts with xeroderma pigmentosum damage-recognition protein, XPA, in the damage recognition step, and then the endonucleases XPG and ERCC1/XPF are recruited to the RPA-XPA-damaged DNA complex in the excision step (He et al., 1995). Interactions of RPA with those proteins are critical in this process (Wold, 1997; Iftode et al., 1999). A great deal of protein dynamics research has indicated that the interactions between RPA and other DNA-metabolism proteins are choreographed on the ssDNA to recruit the required protein present at the proper time (Fanning et al., 2006).Human, animals, and fungi have single copy for each subunit of RPA (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sutils/genom_table.cgi). Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and rice (Oryza sativa), however, have multiple genes for most RPA subunits (Ishibashi et al., 2006; Shultz et al., 2007). Most of them have not unveiled exact function up to now. To elucidate the molecular basis of meiosis in rice, we performed a large-scale screen for sterile mutants using our T-DNA insertion mutant library (Wu et al., 2003). Previously, we reported the cloning of OsPAIR3, a novel gene required for homologous chromosome pairing and synapsis in rice (Yuan et al., 2009). Here we report the characterization of another sterile mutant with a T-DNA insertion in OsRPA1a. Our results indicate that OsRPA1a is essential for DNA repair but may play redundant roles in DNA replication and recombination in rice.     

BRIT1/MCPH1 Is Essential for Mitotic and Meiotic Recombination DNA Repair and Maintaining Genomic Stability in Mice

BRIT1 protein (also known as MCPH1) contains 3 BRCT domains which are conserved in BRCA1, BRCA2, and other important molecules involved in DNA damage signaling, DNA repair, and tumor suppression. BRIT1 mutations or aberrant expression are found in primary microcephaly patients as well as in cancer patients. Recent in vitro studies suggest that BRIT1/MCPH1 functions as a novel key regulator in the DNA damage response pathways. To investigate its physiological role and dissect the underlying mechanisms, we generated BRIT1 ^−/− mice and identified its essential roles in mitotic and meiotic recombination DNA repair and in maintaining genomic stability. Both BRIT1 ^−/− mice and mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were hypersensitive to γ-irradiation. BRIT1 ^−/− MEFs and T lymphocytes exhibited severe chromatid breaks and reduced RAD51 foci formation after irradiation. Notably, BRIT1 ^−/− mice were infertile and meiotic homologous recombination was impaired. BRIT1-deficient spermatocytes exhibited a failure of chromosomal synapsis, and meiosis was arrested at late zygotene of prophase I accompanied by apoptosis. In mutant spermatocytes, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) were formed, but localization of RAD51 or BRCA2 to meiotic chromosomes was severely impaired. In addition, we found that BRIT1 could bind to RAD51/BRCA2 complexes and that, in the absence of BRIT1, recruitment of RAD51 and BRCA2 to chromatin was reduced while their protein levels were not altered, indicating that BRIT1 is involved in mediating recruitment of RAD51/BRCA2 to the damage site. Collectively, our BRIT1-null mouse model demonstrates that BRIT1 is essential for maintaining genomic stability in vivo to protect the hosts from both programmed and irradiation-induced DNA damages, and its depletion causes a failure in both mitotic and meiotic recombination DNA repair via impairing RAD51/BRCA2''s function and as a result leads to infertility and genomic instability in mice.     

Meiotic Recombination, Noncoding DNA and Genomic Organization in Caenorhabditis Elegans

The genetic map of each Caenorhabditis elegans chromosome has a central gene cluster (less pronounced on the X chromosome) that contains most of the mutationally defined genes. Many linkage group termini also have clusters, though involving fewer loci. We examine the factors shaping the genetic map by analyzing the rate of recombination and gene density across the genome using the positions of cloned genes and random cDNA clones from the physical map. Each chromosome has a central gene-dense region (more diffuse on the X) with discrete boundaries, flanked by gene-poor regions. Only autosomes have reduced rates of recombination in these gene-dense regions. Cluster boundaries appear discrete also by recombination rate, and the boundaries defined by recombination rate and gene density mostly, but not always, coincide. Terminal clusters have greater gene densities than the adjoining arm but similar recombination rates. Thus, unlike in other species, most exchange in C. elegans occurs in gene-poor regions. The recombination rate across each cluster is constant and similar; and cluster size and gene number per chromosome are independent of the physical size of chromosomes. We propose a model of how this genome organization arose.     

Pds1p Is Required for Meiotic Recombination and Prophase I Progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Sister-chromatid separation at the metaphase–anaphase transition is regulated by a proteolytic cascade. Destruction of the securin Pds1p liberates the Esp1p separase, which ultimately targets the mitotic cohesin Mcd1p/Scc1p for destruction. Pds1p stabilization by the spindle or DNA damage checkpoints prevents sister-chromatid separation while mutants lacking PDS1 (pds1Δ) are temperature sensitive for growth due to elevated chromosome loss. This report examined the role of the budding yeast Pds1p in meiotic progression using genetic, cytological, and biochemical assays. Similar to its mitotic function, Pds1p destruction is required for metaphase I–anaphase I transition. However, even at the permissive temperature for growth, pds1Δ mutants arrest with prophase I spindle and nuclear characteristics. This arrest was partially suppressed by preventing recombination initiation or by inactivating a subset of recombination checkpoint components. Further studies revealed that Pds1p is required for recombination in both double-strand-break formation and synaptonemal complex assembly. Although deleting PDS1 did not affect the degradation of the meiotic cohesin Rec8p, Mcd1p was precociously destroyed as cells entered the meiotic program. This role is meiosis specific as Mcd1p destruction is not altered in vegetative pds1Δ cultures. These results define a previously undescribed role for Pds1p in cohesin maintenance, recombination, and meiotic progression.     

Mapping Meiotic Single-Strand DNA Reveals a New Landscape of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), which are formed by the Spo11 protein, initiate meiotic recombination. Previous DSB-mapping studies have used rad50S or sae2Δ mutants, which are defective in break processing, to accumulate Spo11-linked DSBs, and report large (≥ 50 kb) “DSB-hot” regions that are separated by “DSB-cold” domains of similar size. Substantial recombination occurs in some DSB-cold regions, suggesting that DSB patterns are not normal in rad50S or sae2Δ mutants. We therefore developed a novel method to map genome-wide, single-strand DNA (ssDNA)–associated DSBs that accumulate in processing-capable, repair-defective dmc1Δ and dmc1Δ rad51Δ mutants. DSBs were observed at known hot spots, but also in most previously identified “DSB-cold” regions, including near centromeres and telomeres. Although approximately 40% of the genome is DSB-cold in rad50S mutants, analysis of meiotic ssDNA from dmc1Δ shows that most of these regions have substantial DSB activity. Southern blot assays of DSBs in selected regions in dmc1Δ, rad50S, and wild-type cells confirm these findings. Thus, DSBs are distributed much more uniformly than was previously believed. Comparisons of DSB signals in dmc1, dmc1 rad51, and dmc1 spo11 mutant strains identify Dmc1 as a critical strand-exchange activity genome-wide, and confirm previous conclusions that Spo11-induced lesions initiate all meiotic recombination.     

标记减数分裂遗传重组的免疫荧光染色方法

联会复合体免疫荧光技术在全基因减数分裂遗传重组研究中具有精确和直观的优势.本研究通过免疫荧光染色方法制备小鼠精母细胞联会复合体,研究其形态组成与遗传重组特征,展示雄性小鼠遗传重组图谱并分析其重组位点(MLH1位点)的分布特征.4只小鼠共145个精母细胞在平均每个细胞的MLH1位点数为23.3±2.4;在常染色体联会复合体中,未发现有3个MLH1位点的联会复合体,具有1个MLH1位点的联会复合体较多,平均为14.2;无XY联会复合体的细胞占所有细胞的4.1%,XY联会复合体上有MLH1位点的细胞占30.2%;联会复合体上有裂缝的细胞占0.7%.通过联会复合体免疫荧光染色可以清晰地分辨出联会复合体(红色)、着丝粒(蓝色)和MLH1位点(绿色),是遗传重组分析的一种强有力工具.     

Evidence for Both 3'' and 5'' Single-Strand DNA Ends in Intermediates in Chi-Stimulated Recombination in Vivo

This paper focuses on elucidation of the structures of intermediates in recombination stimulated by Chi recombination hotspots in vivo. We report that null mutations in genes encoding single-strand exonucleases of 3' polarity, Exonuclease I (Exo I), of 5' polarity, RecJ, and of both polarities, Exo VII, alter the ability of Chi sites to promote recombination, and diminish the frequency of recombination. Maximal effects occur when single-strand exonucleases of both polarities are eliminated. These data imply that 3' and 5' single-strand DNA ends, the substrates for these exonucleases, exist in bona fide, product-generating intermediates in Chi-stimulated recombination in vivo. These results also identify three new proteins not known previously to affect RecBCD-mediated recombination.     

Alternative Induction of Meiotic Recombination From Single-Base Lesions of DNA Deaminases

Meiotic recombination enhances genetic diversity as well as ensures proper segregation of homologous chromosomes, requiring Spo11-initiated double-strand breaks (DSBs). DNA deaminases act on regions of single-stranded DNA and deaminate cytosine to uracil (dU). In the immunoglobulin locus, this lesion will initiate point mutations, gene conversion, and DNA recombination. To begin to delineate the effect of induced base lesions on meiosis, we analyzed the effect of expressing DNA deaminases (activation-induced deaminase, AID, and APOBEC3C) in germ cells. We show that meiotic dU:dG lesions can partially rescue a spo11Δ phenotype in yeast and worm. In rec12 Schizosaccharomyces pombe, AID expression increased proper chromosome segregation, thereby enhancing spore viability, and induced low-frequency meiotic crossovers. Expression of AID in the germ cells of Caenorhabditis elegans spo-11 induced meiotic RAD-51 foci formation and chromosomal bivalency and segregation, as well as an increase in viability. RNAi experiments showed that this rescue was dependent on uracil DNA-glycosylase (Ung). Furthermore, unlike ionizing radiation-induced spo-11 rescue, AID expression did not induce large numbers of DSBs during the rescue. This suggests that the products of DNA deamination and base excision repair, such as uracil, an abasic site, or a single-stranded nick, are sufficient to initiate and alter meiotic recombination in uni- and multicellular organisms.     

The Yeast Mer2 Gene Is Required for Chromosome Synapsis and the Initiation of Meiotic Recombination

Mutation of the MER2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae confers meiotic lethality. To gain insight into the function of the Mer2 protein, we have carried out a detailed characterization of the mer2 null mutant. Genetic analysis indicates that mer2 completely eliminates meiotic interchromosomal gene conversion and crossing over. In addition, mer2 abolishes intrachromosomal meiotic recombination, both in the ribosomal DNA array and in an artificial duplication. The results of a physical assay demonstrate that the mer2 mutation prevents the formation of meiosis-specific, double-strand breaks, indicating that the Mer2 protein acts at or before the initiation of meiotic recombination. Electron microscopic analysis reveals that the mer2 mutant makes axial elements, which are precursors to the synaptonemal complex, but homologous chromosomes fail to synapse. Fluorescence in situ hybridization of chromosome-specific DNA probes to spread meiotic chromosomes demonstrates that homolog alignment is also significantly reduced in the mer2 mutant. Although the MER2 gene is transcribed during vegetative growth, deletion or overexpression of the MER2 gene has no apparent effect on mitotic recombination or DNA damage repair. We suggest that the primary defect in the mer2 mutant is in the initiation of meiotic genetic exchange.     

The Rec102 Mutant of Yeast Is Defective in Meiotic Recombination and Chromosome Synapsis

A mutation at the REC102 locus was identified in a screen for yeast mutants that produce inviable spores. rec102 spore lethality is rescued by a spo13 mutation, which causes cells to bypass the meiosis I division. The rec102 mutation completely eliminates meiotically induced gene conversion and crossing over but has no effect on mitotic recombination frequencies. Cytological studies indicate that the rec102 mutant makes axial elements (precursors to the synaptonemal complex), but homologous chromosomes fail to synapse. In addition, meiotic chromosome segregation is significantly delayed in rec102 strains. Studies of double and triple mutants indicate that the REC102 protein acts before the RAD52 gene product in the meiotic recombination pathway. The REC102 gene was cloned based on complementation of the mutant defect and the gene was mapped to chromosome XII between CDC25 and STE11.     

Sister Chromatid Cohesion Remodeling and Meiotic Recombination

Proper control of cohesion along the chromosome arms is essential for segregation of homologous chromosomes in meiosis. In a recent study we reported that Tid1p, a protein previously implicated in recombination, is required for resolution of Mcd1p-dependent cohesion in meiosis. Here we demonstrate that Pds5p and Dmc1p promote this cohesion. Pds5p is known to be required for maintenance of cohesion while Dmc1p is recognized as essential for meiotic recombination. Finding that the same defect in separation of sister chromatids could be suppressed by disrupting the functions of these proteins supports the emerging recognition that cohesion is remodeled during recombination and further indicates that cohesion is modified specifically to regulate meiotic recombination. We also find that overexpression of the regulatory subunit of Cdc7p kinase, Dbf4p, suppresses the tid1Δ sporulation defect, suggesting a role for Cdc7p/Dbf4p in regulating cohesion.     

Chromosomal Sites Necessary for Normal Levels of Meiotic Recombination in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. Evidence for and Mapping of the Sites

Meiotic exchange was measured in females heterozygous for a normal sequence X chromosome and for each of eleven T(1;4)s and each of sixteen T(1;Y)s. The results indicate that the X chromosome can be divided into five intervals, such that heterozygosity for a breakpoint in one interval strongly suppresses exchange within that interval, but has little or no effect on exchange in other intervals. The boundaries between these intervals are identified and mapped to regions 3C4-6/7, 7A-7E, 11A and proximal to 18C on the standard salivary map; each boundary is located at (or within a small region containing) a major constriction (i.e., a block of intercalary heterochromatin).--Exchange was examined in females heterozygous for translocations broken within the constriction at 11A. The results imply that a boundary occupies only a subregion of the entire constriction and is subdivisible by translocation breakpoints. Several other properties of boundaries have been elucidated. Finally, the relationship of these data to a simple model of meiotic pairing proposed by I. Sandler (1956) and to the role of intercalary heterochromatin in the meiotic process is discussed.     

Meiotic Recombination and DNA Synthesis in a New Cell Cycle Mutant of SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE

Vegetative cells carrying the new temperature-sensitive mutation cdc40 arrest at the restrictive temperature with a medial nuclear division phenotype. DNA replication is observed under these conditions, but most cells remain sensitive to hydroxyurea and do not complete the ongoing cell cycle if the drug is present during release from the temperature block. It is suggested that the cdc40 lesion affects an essential function in DNA synthesis. Normal meiosis is observed at the permissive temperature in cdc40 homozygotes. At the restrictive temperature, a full round of premeiotic DNA replication is observed, but neither commitment to recombination nor later meiotic events occur. Meiotic cells that are already committed to the recombination process at the permissive temperature do not complete it if transferred to the restrictive temperature before recombination is realized. These temperature shift-up experiments demonstrate that the CDC40 function is required for the completion of recombination events, as well as for the earlier stage of recombination commitment. Temperature shift-down experiments with cdc40 homozygotes suggest that meiotic segregation depends on the final events of recombination rather than on commitment to recombination.