N-myristoylation determines dual targeting of mammalian NADH-cytochrome b5 reductase to ER and mitochondrial outer membranes by a mechanism of kinetic partitioning

Mammalian NADH-cytochrome b5 reductase (b5R) is an N-myristoylated protein that is dually targeted to ER and mitochondrial outer membranes. The N-linked myristate is not required for anchorage to membranes because a stretch of hydrophobic amino acids close to the NH2 terminus guarantees a tight interaction of the protein with the phospholipid bilayer. Instead, the fatty acid is required for targeting of b5R to mitochondria because a nonmyristoylated mutant is exclusively localized to the ER. Here, we have investigated the mechanism by which N-linked myristate affects b5R targeting. We find that myristoylation interferes with interaction of the nascent chain with signal recognition particle, so that a portion of the nascent chains escapes from cotranslational integration into the ER and can be post-translationally targeted to the mitochondrial outer membrane. Thus, competition between two cotranslational events, binding of signal recognition particle and modification by N-myristoylation, determines the site of translation and the localization of b5R.     

Structural features within the nascent chain regulate alternative targeting of secretory proteins to mitochondria

Protein targeting to specified cellular compartments is essential to maintain cell function and homeostasis. In eukaryotic cells, two major pathways rely on N‐terminal signal peptides to target proteins to either the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or mitochondria. In this study, we show that the ER signal peptides of the prion protein‐like protein shadoo, the neuropeptide hormone somatostatin and the amyloid precursor protein have the property to mediate alternative targeting to mitochondria. Remarkably, the targeting direction of these signal peptides is determined by structural elements within the nascent chain. Each of the identified signal peptides promotes efficient ER import of nascent chains containing α‐helical domains, but targets unstructured polypeptides to mitochondria. Moreover, we observed that mitochondrial targeting by the ER signal peptides correlates inversely with ER import efficiency. When ER import is compromised, targeting to mitochondria is enhanced, whereas improving ER import efficiency decreases mitochondrial targeting. In conclusion, our study reveals a novel mechanism of dual targeting to either the ER or mitochondria that is mediated by structural features within the nascent chain.     

Coupling of protein synthesis and mitochondrial import in a homologous yeast in vitro system.

We made use of a homologous cell-free mitochondrial protein import system derived from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to investigate the coupling of protein synthesis and import. Mitochondrial precursor proteins were synthesized in a yeast lysate either in the presence or absence of isolated yeast mitochondria. We were, therefore, able to analyze protein import into mitochondria either in a strictly posttranslational reaction (when isolated mitochondria were added only after protein synthesis has been arrested by the addition of cycloheximide) or in a reaction in which synthesis and import were permitted to occur simultaneously. We found that the import of a precursor protein consisting of the amino-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence of cytochrome oxidase subunit IV fused to mouse dihydrofolate reductase is very inefficient in a strictly posttranslational reaction, whereas efficient import is observed if precursor synthesis and import are coupled. The same result was obtained when we analyzed the import of bulk endogenous yeast mitochondrial proteins in this system. Finally, we found that the insertion of the yeast outer membrane protein porin is also several times more efficient when synthesis and insertion are coupled.     

The human mitochondrial import receptor, hTom20p, prevents a cryptic matrix targeting sequence from gaining access to the protein translocation machinery

Yeast Mas70p and NADH cytochrome b5 reductase are bitopic integral proteins of the mitochondrial outer membrane and are inserted into the lipid-bilayer in an Nin-Ccyto orientation via an NH2-terminal signal- anchor sequence. The signal anchor of both proteins is comprised of a short, positively charged domain followed by the predicted transmembrane segment. The positively charged domain is capable of functioning independently as a matrix-targeting signal in yeast mitochondria in vitro but does not support import into mammalian mitochondria (rat or human). Rather, this domain represents a cryptic signal that can direct import into mammalian mitochondria only if proximal components of the outer membrane import machinery are removed. This can be accomplished either by treating the surface of the intact mitochondria with trypsin or by generating mitoplasts. The import receptor Tom20p (Mas20p/MOM19) is responsible for excluding the cryptic matrix-targeting signal from mammalian mitochondria since replacement of yeast Tom20p with the human receptor confers this property to the yeast organelle while at the same time maintaining import of other proteins. In addition to contributing to positive recognition of precursor proteins, therefore, the results suggest that hTom20p may also have the ability to screen potential matrix-targeting sequences and exclude certain proteins that would otherwise be recognized and imported by distal components of the outer and inner membrane protein- translocation machinery. These findings also indicate, however, that cryptic signals, if they exist within otherwise native precursor proteins, may remain topogenically silent until the precursor successfully clears hTom20p, at which time the activity of the cryptic signal is manifested and can contribute to subsequent translocation and sorting of the polypeptide.     

Translation rate underpins specific targeting of N-terminal transmembrane proteins to mitochondria

Protein biogenesis is a complex process, and complexity is greatly increased in eukaryotic cells through specific targeting of proteins to different organelles. To direct targeting, organellar proteins carry an organelle-specific targeting signal for recognition by organelle-specific import machinery. However, the situation is confusing for transmembrane domain (TMD)-containing signal-anchored (SA) proteins of various organelles because TMDs function as an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) targeting signal. Although ER targeting of SA proteins is well understood, how they are targeted to mitochondria and chloroplasts remains elusive. Here, we investigated how the targeting specificity of SA proteins is determined for specific targeting to mitochondria and chloroplasts. Mitochondrial targeting requires multiple motifs around and within TMDs: a basic residue and an arginine-rich region flanking the N- and C-termini of TMDs, respectively, and an aromatic residue in the C-terminal side of the TMD that specify mitochondrial targeting in an additive manner. These motifs play a role in slowing down the elongation speed during translation, thereby ensuring mitochondrial targeting in a co-translational manner. By contrast, the absence of any of these motifs individually or together causes at varying degrees chloroplast targeting that occurs in a post-translational manner.     

Membrane protein topology of oleosin is constrained by its long hydrophobic domain.

Oleosin proteins from Arabidopsis assume a unique endoplasmic reticulum (ER) topology with a membrane-integrated hydrophobic (H) domain of 72 residues, flanked by two cytosolic hydrophilic domains. We have investigated the targeting and topological determinants present within the oleosin polypeptide sequence using ER-derived canine pancreatic microsomes. Our data indicate that oleosins are integrated into membranes by a cotranslational, translocon-mediated pathway. This is supported by the identification of two independent functional signal sequences in the H domain, and by demonstrating the involvement of the SRP receptor in membrane targeting. Oleosin topology was manipulated by the addition of an N-terminal cleavable signal sequence, resulting in translocation of the N terminus to the microsomal lumen. Surprisingly, the C terminus failed to translocate. Inhibition of C-terminal translocation was not dependent on either the sequence of hydrophobic segments in the H domain, the central proline knot motif or charges flanking the H domain. Therefore, the topological constraint results from the length and/or the hydrophobicity of the H domain, implying a general case that long hydrophobic spans are unable to translocate their C terminus to the ER lumen.     

Tom20 and Tom22 share the common signal recognition pathway in mitochondrial protein import

Precise targeting of mitochondrial precursor proteins to mitochondria requires receptor functions of Tom20, Tom22, and Tom70 on the mitochondrial surface. Tom20 is a major import receptor that recognizes preferentially mitochondrial presequences, and Tom70 is a specialized receptor that recognizes presequence-less inner membrane proteins. The cytosolic domain of Tom22 appears to function as a receptor in cooperation with Tom20, but how its substrate specificity differs from that of Tom20 remains unclear. To reveal possible differences in substrate specificities between Tom20 and Tom22, if any, we deleted the receptor domain of Tom20 or Tom22 in mitochondria in vitro by introducing cleavage sites for a tobacco etch virus protease between the receptor domains and transmembrane segments of Tom20 and Tom22. Then mitochondria without the receptor domain of Tom20 or Tom22 were analyzed for their abilities to import various mitochondrial precursor proteins targeted to different mitochondrial subcompartments in vitro. The effects of deletion of the receptor domains on the import of different mitochondrial proteins for different import pathways were quite similar between Tom20 and Tom22. Therefore Tom20 and Tom22 are apparently involved in the same step or sequential steps along the same pathway of targeting signal recognition in import.     

Mitochondrial protein import: recognition of internal import signals of BCS1 by the TOM complex

BCS1, a component of the inner membrane of mitochondria, belongs to the group of proteins with internal, noncleavable import signals. Import and intramitochondrial sorting of BCS1 are encoded in the N-terminal 126 amino acid residues. Three sequence elements were identified in this region, namely, the transmembrane domain (amino acid residues 51 to 68), a presequence type helix (residues 69 to 83), and an import auxiliary region (residues 84 to 126). The transmembrane domain is not required for stable binding to the TOM complex. The Tom receptors (Tom70, Tom22 and Tom20), as determined by peptide scan analysis, interact with the presequence-like helix, yet the highest binding was to the third sequence element. We propose that the initial recognition of BCS1 precursor at the surface of the organelle mainly depends on the auxiliary region and does not require the transmembrane domain. This essential region represents a novel type of signal with targeting and sorting functions. It is recognized by all three known mitochondrial import receptors, demonstrating their capacity to decode various targeting signals. We suggest that the BCS1 precursor crosses the TOM complex as a loop structure and that once the precursor emerges from the TOM complex, all three structural elements are essential for the intramitochondrial sorting to the inner membrane.     

Biogenesis of mitochondrial outer membrane proteins

Mitochondria are surrounded by two distinct membranes: the outer and the inner membrane. The mitochondrial outer membrane mediates numerous interactions between the mitochondrial metabolic and genetic systems and the rest of the eukaryotic cell. Proteins of this membrane are nuclear-encoded and synthesized as precursor proteins in the cytosol. They are targeted to the mitochondria and inserted into their target membrane via various pathways. This review summarizes our current knowledge of the sorting signals for this specific targeting and describes the mechanisms by which the mitochondrial import machineries recognize precursor proteins, mediate their membrane integration and facilitate assembly into functional complexes.     

A molecular switch for targeting between endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria: conversion of a mitochondria-targeting element into an ER-targeting signal in DAKAP1

dAKAP1 (AKAP121, S-AKAP84), a dual specificity PKA scaffold protein, exists in several forms designated as a, b, c, and d. Whether dAKAP1 targets to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or mitochondria depends on the presence of the N-terminal 33 amino acids (N1), and these N-terminal variants are generated by either alternative splicing and/or differential initiation of translation. The mitochondrial targeting motif, which is localized between residues 49 and 63, is comprised of a hydrophobic helix followed by positive charges ( Ma, Y., and Taylor, S. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 27328-27336 ). dAKAP1 is located on the cytosolic surface of mitochondria outer membrane and both smooth and rough ER membrane. A single residue, Asp(31), within the first 33 residues of dAKAP1b is required for ER targeting. Asp(31), which functions as a separate motif from the mitochondrial targeting signal, converts the mitochondrial-targeting signal into a bipartite ER-targeting signal, without destroying the mitochondria-targeting signal. Therefore dAKAP1 possesses a single targeting element capable of targeting to both mitochondria and ER, with the ER signal overlapping the mitochondria signal. The specificity of ER or mitochondria targeting is determined and switched by the availability of the negatively charged residue, Asp(31).     

Bimodal targeting of microsomal CYP2E1 to mitochondria through activation of an N-terminal chimeric signal by cAMP-mediated phosphorylation

Cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) plays an important role in alcohol-induced toxicity and oxidative stress. Recently, we showed that this predominantly microsomal protein is also localized in rat hepatic mitochondria. In this report, we show that the N-terminal 30 amino acids of CYP2E1 contain a chimeric signal for bimodal targeting of the apoprotein to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria. We demonstrate that the cryptic mitochondrial targeting signal at sequence 21-31 of the protein is activated by cAMP-dependent phosphorylation at Ser-129. S129A mutation resulted in lower affinity for binding to cytoplasmic Hsp70, mitochondrial translocases (TOM40 and TIM44) and reduced mitochondrial import. S129A mutation, however, did not affect the extent of binding to the signal recognition particle and association with ER membrane translocator protein Sec61. Addition of saturating levels of signal recognition particle caused only a partial inhibition of CYP2E1 translation under in vitro conditions, and saturating levels of ER resulted only in partial membrane integration. cAMP enhanced the mitochondrial CYP2E1 (referred to as P450MT5) level but did not affect its level in the ER. Our results provide new insights on the mechanism of cAMP-mediated activation of a cryptic mitochondrial targeting signal and regulation of P450MT5 targeting to mitochondria.     

Import of proteins into mitochondria: a multi-step process

Translocation of precursor proteins from the cytosol into mitochondria is a multi-step process. The generation of translocation intermediates, i.e. the reversible accumulation of precursors at distinct stages of their import pathway into mitochondria ('translocation arrest'), has allowed the experimental characterization of distinct functional steps of protein import. These steps include: ATP-dependent unfolding of precursors; specific recognition of precursors by distinct receptors on the mitochondrial surface; interaction of precursors; specific recognition of precursors by distinct receptors on the mitochondrial surface; interaction of precursors with a general insertion protein ('GIP') in the outer mitochondrial membrane; membrane-potential-dependent translocation into the inner membrane at contact sites between both membranes; proteolytic processing of precursors; and intramitochondrial sorting of precursors via the matrix space ('conservative sorting'). The functional characteristics unveiled by studying mitochondrial protein import appear to be of general interest for investigations on intracellular protein sorting.     

N-terminal domain of the dual-targeted pea glutathione reductase signal peptide controls organellar targeting efficiency

Import of nuclear-encoded proteins into mitochondria and chloroplasts is generally organelle specific and its specificity depends on the N-terminal signal peptide. Yet, a group of proteins known as dual-targeted proteins have a targeting peptide capable of leading the mature protein to both organelles. We have investigated the domain structure of the dual-targeted pea glutathione reductase (GR) signal peptide by using N-terminal truncations. A mutant of the GR precursor (pGR) starting with the second methionine residue of the targeting peptide, pGRdelta2-4, directed import into both organelles, negating the possibility that dual import was controlled by the nature of the N terminus. The deletion of the 30 N-terminal residues (pGRdelta2-30) inhibited import efficiency into chloroplasts substantially and almost completely into mitochondria, whereas the removal of only 16 N-terminal amino acid residues (pGRdelta2-16) resulted in the strongly stimulated mitochondrial import without significantly affecting chloroplast import. Furthermore, N-terminal truncations of the signal peptide (pGRdelta2-16 and pGRdelta2-30) greatly stimulated the mitochondrial processing activity measured with the isolated processing peptidase. These results suggest a domain structure for the dual-targeting peptide of pGR and the existence of domains controlling organellar import efficiency therein.     

Nascent polypeptide-associated complex stimulates protein import into yeast mitochondria

To identify yeast cytosolic proteins that mediate targeting of precursor proteins to mitochondria, we developed an in vitro import system consisting of purified yeast mitochondria and a radiolabeled mitochondrial precursor protein whose C terminus was still attached to the ribosome. In this system, the N terminus of the nascent chain was translocated across both mitochondrial membranes, generating a translocation intermediate spanning both membranes. The nascent chain could then be completely chased into the mitochondrial matrix after release from the ribosome. Generation of this import intermediate was dependent on a mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial surface proteins, and was stimulated by proteins that could be released from the ribosomes by high salt. The major salt-released stimulatory factor was yeast nascent polypeptide-associated complex (NAC). Purified NAC fully restored import of salt-washed ribosome-bound nascent chains by enhancing productive binding of the chains to mitochondria. We propose that ribosome-associated NAC facilitates recognition of nascent precursor chains by the mitochondrial import machinery.     

Sorting pathways of mitochondrial inner membrane proteins

Two distinct pathways of sorting and assembly of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial inner membrane proteins are described. In the first pathway, precursor proteins that carry amino-terminal targeting signals are initially translocated via contact sites between both mitochondrial membranes into the mitochondrial matrix. They become proteolytically processed, interact with the 60-kDa heat-shock protein hsp60 in the matrix and are retranslocated to the inner membrane. The sorting of subunit 9 of Neurospora crassa F0-ATPase has been studied as an example. F0 subunit 9 belongs to that class of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial proteins which are evolutionarily derived from a prokaryotic ancestor according to the endosymbiont hypothesis. We suggest that after import into mitochondria, these proteins follow the ancestral sorting and assembly pathways established in prokaryotes (conservative sorting). On the other hand, ADP/ATP carrier was found not to require interaction with hsp60 for import and assembly. This agrees with previous findings that the ADP/ATP carrier possesses non-amino-terminal targeting signals and uses a different import receptor to other mitochondrial precursor proteins. It is proposed that the ADP/ATP carrier represents a class of mitochondrial inner membrane proteins which do not have a prokaryotic equivalent and thus appear to follow a non-conservative sorting pathway.     

The N-terminal domain of Tob55 has a receptor-like function in the biogenesis of mitochondrial beta-barrel proteins

beta-Barrel proteins constitute a distinct class of mitochondrial outer membrane proteins. For import into mitochondria, their precursor forms engage the TOM complex. They are then relayed to the TOB complex, which mediates their insertion into the outer membrane. We studied the structure-function relationships of the core component of the TOB complex, Tob55. Tob55 precursors with deletions in the N-terminal domain were not affected in their targeting to and insertion into the mitochondrial outer membrane. Replacement of wild-type Tob55 by these deletion variants resulted in reduced growth of cells, and mitochondria isolated from such cells were impaired in their capacity to import beta-barrel precursors. The purified N-terminal domain was able to bind beta-barrel precursors in a specific manner. Collectively, these results demonstrate that the N-terminal domain of Tob55 recognizes precursors of beta-barrel proteins. This recognition may contribute to the coupling of the translocation of beta-barrel precursors across the TOM complex to their interaction with the TOB complex.     

Conservative sorting of F0-ATPase subunit 9: export from matrix requires delta pH across inner membrane and matrix ATP.

In an attempt to understand the mechanisms of sorting of mitochondrial inner membrane proteins, we have analyzed the import of subunit 9 of the mitochondrial F1F0-ATPase (Su9) from Neurospora crassa, an integral inner membrane protein. A chimeric protein was used consisting of the presequence and the first transmembrane domain of Su9 fused to mouse dihydrofolate reductase (preSu9(1-112)-DHFR). This protein attains the correct topology across the inner membrane (Nout-Cin) following import. The transmembrane domain becomes first completely imported into the matrix, where after processing of the presequence, it mediates membrane insertion and export of the N-terminal tail. Import and export steps can be experimentally dissected into two distinct events. Translocation of the N-terminal hydrophilic tail out of the matrix was blocked when the presequence was not processed, indicating an important role of the sequences and charges flanking the hydrophobic domain. Furthermore, export was supported by a delta pH and required matrix ATP hydrolysis. Thus the hydrophobic transmembrane domain operates as a membrane insertion signal and not as a stop-transfer signal. Our findings suggest that several aspects of this sorting process have been conserved from their prokaryotic ancestors.     

Import into mitochondria of precursors containing hydrophobic passenger proteins: pretreatment of precursors with urea inhibits import

We have studied the import into isolated yeast mitochondria of three hydrophobic passenger proteins attached to the N-terminal cleavable presequence of mitochondrial ATPase subunit 9 from Neurospora crassa. One natural precursor (pN9) contained N. crassa subunit 9; two chimaeric precursors, N9L/Y8-1 and N9L/Y9-2, respectively contained yeast mitochondrial ATPase subunits 8 and 9. In the absence of urea, pN9 and N9L/Y8-1 are imported efficiently but N9L/Y9-2 is not imported. After pretreatment of precursors in 4 M urea, binding of pN9 to mitochondria is marginally affected while its import is substantially inhibited; the binding to mitochondria of chimaeric proteins, N9L/Y8-1 and N9L/Y9-2, is greatly enhanced but no import is observed. This behaviour of import precursors containing hydrophobic passenger proteins is contrasted with that of a hydrophilic chimaeric precursor pCOXIV-DHFR, whose binding and import are enhanced by pretreatment with a high concentration of urea (8 M). The import of N9L/Y8-1 is very sensitive to the presence of low concentrations of urea in the import reaction mixture, and is abolished above 0.5 M urea although precursor binding to mitochondria is increased. By contrast, neither the import nor binding of pCOXIV-DHFR is affected directly by urea up to 0.8 M. These deleterious effects of urea on import of the chimaeric precursors N9L/Y8-1 and N9L/Y9-2 are interpreted in terms of a non-productive binding of these precursors to mitochondria, brought about by exposure of their hydrophobic domains resulting from urea unfolding. The generalization that membrane translocation of mitochondrial import precursors is enhanced by their prior unfolding in urea thus does not apply in the case of these precursors containing hydrophobic passenger proteins.     

Combination of hydrophobicity and codon usage bias determines sorting of model K+ channel protein to either mitochondria or endoplasmic reticulum

When the K⁺ channel-like protein Kesv from Ectocarpus siliculosus virus 1 is heterologously expressed in mammalian cells, it is sorted to the mitochondria. This targeting can be redirected to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by altering the codon usage in distinct regions of the gene or by inserting a triplet of hydrophobic amino acids (AAs) into the protein's C-terminal transmembrane domain (ct-TMD). Systematic variations in the flavor of the inserted AAs and/or its codon usage show that a positive charge in the inserted AA triplet alone serves as strong signal for mitochondria sorting. In cases of neutral AA triplets, mitochondria sorting are favored by a combination of hydrophilic AAs and rarely used codons; sorting to the ER exhibits the inverse dependency. This propensity for ER sorting is particularly high when a common codon follows a rarer one in the AA triplet; mitochondria sorting in contrast is supported by codon uniformity. Since parameters like positive charge, hydrophobic AAs, and common codons are known to facilitate elongation of nascent proteins in the ribosome the data suggest a mechanism in which local changes in elongation velocity and co-translational folding in the ct-TMD influence intracellular protein sorting.     

Internal targeting signal of the BCS1 protein: a novel mechanism of import into mitochondria.

The BCS1 protein is anchored in the mitochondrial inner membrane via a single transmembrane domain and has an N(out)-C(in) topology. Unlike the majority of nuclear encoded mitochondrial preproteins, the BCS1 protein does not contain an N-terminal targeting sequence. A positively charged segment of amino acids which is located immediately C-terminal to the transmembrane domain acts as an internal targeting signal. In order to function, we postulate that this sequence co-operates with the transmembrane domain to form a tight hairpin loop structure. This loop is translocated across the inner membrane via the MIM/mt-Hsp70 machinery in a membrane potential-dependent manner. This novel mechanism of import and sorting of the BCS1 protein is proposed to represent a more general mechanism used by a number of inner membrane proteins.