The E3 ubiquitin ligase HOIL-1 induces the polyubiquitination and degradation of SOCS6 associated proteins

The suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins are thought to exert their function through the recruitment of interacting-proteins to the ubiquitin/proteasome degradation pathway. All SOCS proteins bind an Elongin BC E3 ubiquitin ligase complex through the common Socs-box. Here, we show that haem-oxidized IRP2 ubiquitin ligase-1 (HOIL-1), another E3 ubiquitin ligase, interacts with SOCS6. The Ubl domain of HOIL-1 and the SH2 and Socs-box domains of SOCS6 are required for the interaction. HOIL-1 expression stabilizes SOCS6 and induces the ubiquitination and degradation of proteins associated with SOCS6. These data suggest that SOCS proteins may interact with different E3 ubiquitin ligases in addition to a common Elongin BC E3 complex.     

Mutational analyses of the SOCS proteins suggest a dual domain requirement but distinct mechanisms for inhibition of LIF and IL-6 signal transduction.

SOCS-1 (suppressor of cytokine signaling-1) is a representative of a family of negative regulators of cytokine signaling (SOCS-1 to SOCS-7 and CIS) characterized by a highly conserved C-terminal SOCS box preceded by an SH2 domain. This study comprehensively examined the ability of several SOCS family members to negatively regulate the gp130 signaling pathway. SOCS-1 and SOCS-3 inhibited both interleukin-6 (IL-6)- and leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)-induced macrophage differentiation of murine monocytic leukemic M1 cells and LIF induction of a Stat3-responsive reporter construct in 293T fibroblasts. Deletion of amino acids 51-78 in the N-terminal region of SOCS-1 prevented inhibition of LIF signaling. The SOCS-1 and SOCS-3 N-terminal regions were functionally interchangeable, but this did not extend to other SOCS family members. Mutation of SH2 domains abrogated the ability of both SOCS-1 and SOCS-3 to inhibit LIF signal transduction. Unlike SOCS-1, SOCS-3 was unable to inhibit JAK kinase activity in vitro, suggesting that SOCS-1 and SOCS-3 act on the JAK-STAT pathway in different ways. Thus, although inhibition of signaling by SOCS-1 and SOCS-3 requires both the SH2 and N-terminal domains, their mechanisms of action appear to be biochemically different.     

A JAK1/JAK2 chimera can sustain alpha and gamma interferon responses.

Cell lines that are mutated in interferon (IFN) responses have been critical in establishing an essential role for the JAK family of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases in interferon signalling. Mutant gamma1A cells have previously been shown to be complemented by overexpression of JAK2. Here, it is shown that these cells carry a defect in, and can also be complemented by, the beta-subunit of the IFN-gamma receptor, consistent with the hypothesis that the mutation in these cells affects JAK2-receptor association. In contrast, mutant gamma2A cells lack detectable JAK2 mRNA and protein. By using gamma2A cells, the role of various domains and conserved tyrosine residues of JAK2 in IFN-gamma signalling was examined. Individual mutation of six conserved tyrosine residues, mutation of a potential phosphatase binding site, or mutation of the arginine residue in the proposed SH2-like domain had no apparent effect on signalling in response to IFN-gamma. Results with deletion mutants, however, indicated that association of JAK2 with the IFN-gammaR2 subunit requires the amino-terminal region but not the pseudokinase domain. Consistent with this, in chimeras with JAK1, the JAK2 amino-terminal region was required for receptor association and STAT1 activation. Conversely, a JAK1-JAK2 chimera with the amino-terminal domains of JAK1 linked to the pseudokinase and kinase domains of JAK2 is capable of reconstituting JAK-STAT signalling in response to IFN-alpha and -gamma in mutant U4C cells lacking JAK1. The specificity of the JAKs may therefore lie mainly in their structural interaction with different receptor and signalling proteins rather than in the substrate specificity of their kinase domains.     

v-Abl signaling disrupts SOCS-1 function in transformed pre-B cells

The v-Abl oncogene activates Jak-Stat signaling during transformation of pre-B cells in mice. Disrupting Jak activation by deleting the Jak binding domain of v-Abl or by expressing a dominant-negative Jak1 decreases v-Abl transformation efficiency. As SOCS-1 is a known potent inhibitor of Jak kinases, the mechanism by which v-Abl bypasses SOCS-1 regulation to constitutively activate Jak kinases was investigated. SOCS-1 is expressed in v-Abl-transformed cells but is unable to inhibit v-Abl-mediated Jak-Stat signaling. In v-Abl transformants, SOCS-1 can inhibit cytokine signals, but it is more efficient at doing so when the cells are treated with STI571, an Abl kinase inhibitor. Downstream effects of v-Abl signaling include phosphorylation of SOCS-1 on nontyrosine residues, disruption of the interaction between SOCS-1 and the Elongin BC complex, and inhibition of SOCS-1-mediated proteasomal targeting of activated Jaks. These findings reveal a mechanism by which Jak-dependent oncogenes may bypass SOCS-1 inhibition.     

A mutant form of JAB/SOCS1 augments the cytokine-induced JAK/STAT pathway by accelerating degradation of wild-type JAB/CIS family proteins through the SOCS-box

Cytokines exert biological functions by activating Janus tyrosine kinases (JAKs), and JAK inhibitors JAB (also referred to as SOCS1 and SSI1) and CIS3 (SOCS3) play an essential role in the negative regulation of cytokine signaling. We have found that transgenic (Tg) mice expressing a mutant JAB (F59D-JAB) exhibited a more potent STAT3 activation and a more severe colitis than did wild-type littermates after treatment with dextran sulfate sodium. We now find that there is a prolonged activation of JAKs and STATs in response to a number of cytokines in T cells from Tg mice with lck promoter-driven F59D-JAB. Overexpression of F59D-JAB also sustained activation of JAK2 in Ba/F3 cells. These data suggested that F59D-JAB up-regulated STAT activity by sustaining JAK activation. To elucidate molecular mechanisms related to F59D-JAB, we analyzed the effects of F59D-JAB on the JAK/STAT pathway using the 293 cell transient expression system. We found that the C-terminal SOCS-box played an essential role in augmenting cytokine signaling by F59D-JAB. The SOCS-box interacted with the Elongin BC complex, and this interaction stabilized JAB. F59D-JAB induced destabilization of wild-type JAB, whereas overexpression of Elongin BC canceled this effect. Levels of endogenous JAB and CIS3 in T cells from F59D-JAB Tg-mouse were lower than in wild-type mice. We propose that F59D-JAB destabilizes wild-type, endogenous JAB and CIS3 by chelating the Elongin BC complex, thereby sustaining JAK activation.     

SOCS-1 localizes to the microtubule organizing complex-associated 20S proteasome

The regulation of cytokine signaling is critical for controlling cellular proliferation and activation during an immune response. SOCS-1 is a potent inhibitor of Jak kinase activity and of signaling initiated by several cytokines. SOCS-1 protein levels are tightly regulated, and recent data suggest that SOCS-1 may regulate the protein levels of some signaling proteins by the ubiquitin proteasome pathway; however, the cellular mechanism by which SOCS-1 directs proteins for degradation is unknown. In this report, SOCS-1 is found to colocalize and biochemically copurify with the microtubule organizing complex (MTOC) and its associated 20S proteasome. The SOCS-1 SH2 domain is required for the localization of SOCS-1 to the MTOC. Overexpression of SOCS-1 targets Jak1 in an SH2-dependent manner to a perinuclear distribution resembling the MTOC-associated 20S proteasome. Analysis of MTOCs fractionated from SOCS-1-deficient cells demonstrates that SOCS-1 may function redundantly to regulate the localization of Jak1 to the MTOC. Nocodazole inhibits the protein turnover of SOCS-1, demonstrating that the minus-end transport of SOCS-1 to the MTOC-associated 20S proteasome is required to regulate SOCS-1 protein levels. These data link SOCS-1 directly with the proteasome pathway and suggest another function for the SH2 domain of SOCS-1 in the regulation of Jak/STAT signaling.     

Characterization of a peptide inhibitor of Janus kinase 2 that mimics suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 function

Positive and negative regulation of cytokines such as IFN-gamma are key to normal homeostatic function. Negative regulation of IFN-gamma in cells occurs via proteins called suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS)1 and -3. SOCS-1 inhibits IFN-gamma function by binding to the autophosphorylation site of the tyrosine kinase Janus kinase (JAK)2. We have developed a short 12-mer peptide, WLVFFVIFYFFR, that binds to the autophosphorylation site of JAK2, resulting in inhibition of its autophosphorylation as well as its phosphorylation of IFN-gamma receptor subunit IFNGR-1. The JAK2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor peptide (Tkip) did not bind to or inhibit tyrosine autophosphorylation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor or phosphorylation of a substrate peptide by the protooncogene tyrosine kinase c-src. Tkip also inhibited epidermal growth factor receptor autophosphorylation, consistent with the fact that epidermal growth factor receptor is regulated by SOCS-1 and SOCS-3, similar to JAK2. Although Tkip binds to unphosphorylated JAK2 autophosphorylation site peptide, it binds significantly better to tyrosine-1007 phosphorylated JAK2 autophosphorylation site peptide. SOCS-1 only recognizes the JAK2 site in its phosphorylated state. Thus, Tkip recognizes the JAK2 autophosphorylation site similar to SOCS-1, but not precisely the same way. Consistent with inhibition of JAK2, Tkip inhibited the ability of IFN-gamma to induce an antiviral state as well as up-regulate MHC class I molecules on cells at a concentration of approximately 10 microM. This is similar to the K(d) of SOCS-3 for the erythropoietin receptor. These data represent a proof-of-concept demonstration of a peptide mimetic of SOCS-1 that regulates JAK2 tyrosine kinase function.     

SH2B1 enhances leptin signaling by both Janus kinase 2 Tyr813 phosphorylation-dependent and -independent mechanisms

Leptin controls body weight by activating its long form receptor (LEPRb). LEPRb binds to Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase that mediates leptin signaling. We previously reported that genetic deletion of SH2B1 (previously known as SH2-B), a JAK2-binding protein, results in severe leptin-resistant and obese phenotypes, indicating that SH2B1 is a key endogenous positive regulator of leptin sensitivity. Here we show that SH2B1 regulates leptin signaling by multiple mechanisms. In the absence of leptin, SH2B1 constitutively bound, via its non-SH2 domain region(s), to non-tyrosyl-phosphorylated JAK2, and inhibited JAK2. Leptin stimulated JAK2 phosphorylation on Tyr(813), which subsequently bound to the SH2 domain of SH2B1. Binding of the SH2 domain of SH2B1 to phospho-Tyr(813) in JAK2 enhanced leptin induction of JAK2 activity. JAK2 was required for leptin-stimulated phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS1), an upstream activator of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway. Overexpression of SH2B1 enhanced both JAK2- and JAK2(Y813F)-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of IRS1 in response to leptin, even though SH2B1 did not enhance JAK2(Y813F) activation. Leptin promoted the interaction of SH2B1 with IRS1. These data suggest that constitutive SH2B1-JAK2 interaction, mediated by the non-SH2 domain region(s) of SH2B1 and the non-Tyr(813) region(s) in JAK2, increases the local concentration of SH2B1 close to JAK2 and inhibits JAK2 activity. Leptin-stimulated SH2B1-JAK2 interaction, mediated by the SH2 domain of SH2B1 and phospho-Tyr(813) in JAK2, promotes JAK2 activation, thus globally enhancing leptin signaling. SH2B1-IRS1 interaction facilitates IRS1 phosphorylation by recruiting IRS1 to JAK2 and/or by protecting IRS1 from dephosphorylation, thus specifically enhancing leptin stimulation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway.     

Molecular Insight into the Conformational Dynamics of the Elongin BC Complex and Its Interaction with HIV-1 Vif

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 virion infectivity factor (Vif) inhibits the innate viral immunity afforded by the APOBEC3 family of cytidine deaminases. Vif targets the APOBEC3 family for poly-ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation by linking the Elongin-BC-dependent ubiquitin ligase complex with the APOBEC3 proteins. The interaction between Vif and the heterodimeric Elongin BC complex, which is mediated by Vif's viral suppressor of cytokine signaling box, is essential for Vif function. The biophysical consequences of the full-length Vif:Elongin BC interaction have not been extensively reported. In this study, hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry was used to dissect the Vif:Elongin BC interaction. Elongin C was found to be highly dynamic in the Elongin BC complex while Elongin B was much more stable. Recombinant full-length Vif interacted with the Elongin BC complex in vitro with a K_d of 1.9 μM and resulted in observable changes in deuterium uptake in both Elongin C and B. Upon binding to Elongin BC, no significant global conformational changes were detected in Vif by hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry, but a short fragment of Vif that consisted of the viral suppressor of cytokine signaling box showed decreased deuterium incorporation upon Elongin BC incubation, suggesting that this region folds upon binding.     

Negative regulation of FAK signaling by SOCS proteins

Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) becomes activated upon integrin-mediated cell adhesion and controls cellular responses to the engagement of integrins, including cell migration and survival. We show here that a coordinated signaling by integrins and growth factor receptors induces expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 (SOCS-3) and subsequent interaction between endogenous FAK and SOCS-3 proteins in 3T3 fibroblasts. Cotransfection studies demonstrated that SOCS-3, and also SOCS-1, interact with FAK in a FAK-Y397-dependent manner, and that both the Src homology 2 (SH2) and the kinase inhibitory region (KIR) domains of the SOCS proteins contribute to FAK binding. SOCS-1 and SOCS-3 were found to inhibit FAK-associated kinase activity in vitro and tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK in cells. The SOCS proteins also promoted polyubiquitination and degradation of FAK in a SOCS box-dependent manner and inhibited FAK-dependent signaling events, such as cell motility on fibronectin. These studies suggest a negative role of SOCS proteins in FAK signaling, and for a previously unidentified regulatory mechanism for FAK function.     

Prediction of the structure of human Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) comprising JAK homology domains 1 through 7

A theoretical model of human Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) comprising all seven Janus homology domains is presented. The model was generated by application of homology modelling approaches. The three-dimensional structure contains, starting from the N-terminus, FERM (4.1, ezrin, radixin, moesin), SH2 (Src homology region 2), tyrosine kinase-like, and tyrosine kinase domains. The predicted inter-domain orientation in JAK2 is discussed and the currently existing mutational data for Janus kinases are evaluated. Structural details of the SH2 and the FERM domains are presented. The predictions indicate that the SH2 domain is not fully functional. A number of hydrophobic amino acids of the FERM domain that are predicted to be involved in the constitutive association with the cytokine receptors are highlighted. The model gives new insights into the structure-function relationship of this important protein, and areas that could be investigated by mutation studies are highlighted.     

Prediction of the structure of human Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) comprising the two carboxy-terminal domains reveals a mechanism for autoregulation

The structure of human Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) comprising the two C-terminal domains (JH1 and JH2) was predicted by application of homology modelling techniques. JH1 and JH2 represent the tyrosine kinase and tyrosine kinase-like domains, respectively, and are crucial for function and regulation of the protein. A comparison between the structures of the two domains is made and structural differences are highlighted. Prediction of the relative orientation of JH1 and JH2 was aided by a newly developed method for the detection of correlated amino acid mutations. Analysis of the interactions between the two domains led to a model for the regulatory effect of JH2 on JH1. The predictions are consistent with available experimental data on JAK2 or related proteins and provide an explanation for inhibition of JH1 tyrosine kinase activity by the adjacent JH2 domain.