BC-N102 suppress breast cancer tumorigenesis by interfering with cell cycle regulatory proteins and hormonal signaling,and induction of time-course arrest of cell cycle at G1/G0 phase

Mechanisms of breast cancer progression and invasion, often involve alteration of hormonal signaling, and upregulation and/or activation of signal transduction pathways that input to cell cycle regulation. Herein, we describe a rationally designed first-in-class novel small molecule inhibitor for targeting oncogenic and hormonal signaling in ER-positive breast cancer. BC-N102 treatment exhibits dose-dependent cytotoxic effects against ER+ breast cancer cell lines. BC-N102 exhibited time course- and dose-dependent cell cycle arrest via downregulation of the estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), androgen receptor (AR), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), phosphorylated (p)-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), p-Akt, CDK2, and CDK4 while increasing p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), and mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) signaling in breast cancer cell line. In addition, we found that BC-N102 suppressed breast cancer tumorigenesis in vivo and prolonged the survival of animals. Our results suggest that the proper application of BC-N102 may be a beneficial chemotherapeutic strategy for ER+ breast cancer patients.     

Expression of progesterone receptor isoforms A and B is differentially regulated by estrogen in different breast cancer cell lines

Progesterone action in target tissues is mediated through two progesterone receptor (PR) isoforms, PR-A and PR-B, which display different regulatory functions in target cells. Relative expression ratio of these isoforms varies depending on cell and tissue types. Here, we studied the regulation of PR isoform expression by estradiol (E(2)), insulin, IGF-1 and cAMP in different breast cancer cell lines. Although, E(2) induced PR expression in all cell lines studied, the expression ratio of PR-A/PR-B induced by E(2) was dependent on the cell line. The differential regulation of the isoforms was also seen at the mRNA level suggesting that the PR-A and PR-B promoters are differentially regulated by E(2) in different breast cancer cells. Insulin, IGF-1 or cAMP previously reported to induce PR expression however failed to alter the PR expression in our study. This is the first report describing that in different breast cancer cell lines the expression of PR-A and PR-B is regulated by E(2) in a distinct way.     

Immunochemistry for oestrogen receptor,progesterone receptor and HER2 on cell blocks in primary breast carcinoma

K. Kumar S, N. Gupta, A. Rajwanshi, K. Joshi and G. Singh Immunochemistry for oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 on cell blocks in primary breast carcinoma Objective: Steroid receptors and human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) have been used for predicting response to treatment in breast cancers. Fine needle aspiration cytology can provide highly cellular material and can be used for such analysis. The present study was undertaken to assess the reliability of oestrogen and progesterone receptor (ER, PR) status and HER2 as demonstrated by immunochemistry (IHC) on cell blocks from breast carcinoma cases, in comparison with histological sections. Methods: IHC for ER, PR and HER2 was performed on cell blocks and their corresponding tissue sections of 50 primary pre‐chemotherapy breast carcinomas. Positivity for ER and PR was scored according to the Allred scoring system. Strong membranous positivity in more than 30% of tumour cells was considered positive for HER2. The tumours were classified as luminal A, luminal B, HER2‐over‐expressing and triple negative on the basis of ER, PR and HER2 status and results on cell blocks compared with histological sections. Results: Correlation between immunostaining on cell blocks and the corresponding tumour tissues revealed a concordance rate for ER, PR and HER2 of 90% [Correlation coefficient (r) = 0.79], 94% (r = 0.86) and 90% (r = 0.76), respectively. Including five cases in which cell blocks were either ER or PR positive, 43/50 cases (86.0%) could be correctly classified on cell block immunostaining alone. The main reasons for seven discordant cases included technical errors (sampling error and staining error) and interpretational error in HER2 evaluation on cell blocks; the core biopsy was inadequate in one, and apparently false negative for HER2 in another. Conclusion: Cell blocks are useful in the assessment of hormone receptor status and HER2 by IHC, especially in cases of locally advanced breast cancer for planning neoadjuvant chemotherapy. It is highly recommended to have good quality cell blocks and quality control of their interpretation.     

Progestin inhibition of cell death in human breast cancer cell lines

Previously, we have shown that progestins both stimulate proliferation of the progesterone receptor (PR)-rich human breast cancer cell line T47D and protect from cell death, in charcoal-stripped serum-containing medium. To lessen the variability inherent in different preparations of serum, we decided to further characterize progestin inhibition of cell death using serum starvation to kill the cells, and find that progestins protect from serum-starvation-induced apoptosis in T47D cells. This effect exhibits specificity for progestins and is inhibited by the antiprogestin RU486. While progestin inhibits cell death in a dose–responsive manner at physiological concentrations, estradiol-17β surprisingly does not inhibit cell death at any concentration from 0.001 nM to 1 μM. Progestin inhibition of cell death also occurs in at least two other human breast cancer cell lines, one with an intermediate level of PR, MCF-7 cells, and, surprisingly, one with no detectable level of PR, MDA-MB-231 cells. Further, we have found progestin inhibition of cell death caused by the breast cancer chemotherapeutic agents doxorubicin and 5-fluorouracil. These data are consistent with the building body of evidence that progestins are not the benign hormones for breast cancer they have been so long thought to be, but may be harmful both for undiagnosed cases and those undergoing treatment.     

Progesterone receptor inhibits aromatase and inflammatory response pathways in breast cancer cells via ligand-dependent and ligand-independent mechanisms

Aromatase (product of CYP19 gene), the critical enzyme in estrogen biosynthesis, is up-regulated in 70% of all breast cancers and is highly correlated with cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), the rate-determining enzyme in prostanoid biosynthesis. Expression of COX-2 also is correlated with the oncogene HER-2/neu. The efficacy of current endocrine therapies for breast cancer is predicted only if the tumor contains significant amounts of estrogen receptor. Because the progesterone receptor (PR) is an estrogen-induced target gene, it has been suggested that its presence may serve as an indicator of estrogen receptor functional capacity and the differentiation state of the tumor. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that PR serves a crucial protective role by antagonizing inflammatory response pathways in the breast. We observed that progesterone antagonized the stimulatory effects of cAMP and IL-1beta on aromatase, COX-2, and HER-2/neu expression in T47D breast cancer cells. These actions of progesterone were associated with increased expression of the nuclear factor-kappaB inhibitor, IkappaBalpha. In 28 breast cancer cell lines, IkappaBalpha expression was positively correlated with PR mRNA levels; overexpression of a phosphorylation-defective mutant of IkappaBalpha inhibited expression of aromatase, COX-2, and HER-2/neu. Moreover, in breast cancer cell lines cultured in the absence of progesterone, up-regulation of endogenous PR caused decreased expression of aromatase, COX-2, and HER-2/neu expression, whereas down-regulation of endogenous PR resulted in a marked induction of aromatase and HER-2/neu mRNA. Collectively, these findings suggest that PR plays an important antiinflammatory role in breast cancer cells via ligand-dependent and ligand-independent mechanisms.     

Circadian clock,cell cycle,and breast cancer: an updated review

Some key elements are common to two fundamental periodic regulatory processes; the circadian cycle and the cell cycle. Underlying mechanisms of coordination between the two processes are critical for proper cellular functioning and physiology. Disruption in the mechanisms of one process may affect the role of other that may direct critical physiological changes and may cause severe diseases like cancer, etc. More or less persuasive evidences evolve from the breast cancer research. In this mini review, we highlighted the molecular coordination’s of the elements of circadian cycle and the cell cycle and their altered expressions associated with the genesis and progression of breast cancer.     

Estrogen receptor alpha is cell cycle-regulated and regulates the cell cycle in a ligand-dependent fashion

Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) has been implicated in several cell cycle regulatory events and is an important predictive marker of disease outcome in breast cancer patients. Here, we aimed to elucidate the mechanism through which ERα influences proliferation in breast cancer cells. Our results show that ERα protein is cell cycle-regulated in human breast cancer cells and that the presence of 17-β-estradiol (E2) in the culture medium shortened the cell cycle significantly (by 4.5 hours, P < 0.05) compared with unliganded conditions. The alterations in cell cycle duration were observed in the S and G₂/M phases, whereas the G₁ phase was indistinguishable under liganded and unliganded conditions. In addition, ERα knockdown in MCF-7 cells accelerated mitotic exit, whereas transfection of ERα-negative MDA-MB-231 cells with exogenous ERα significantly shortened the S and G₂/M phases (by 9.1 hours, P < 0.05) compared with parental cells. Finally, treatment of MCF-7 cells with antiestrogens revealed that tamoxifen yields a slower cell cycle progression through the S and G₂/M phases than fulvestrant does, presumably because of the destabilizing effect of fulvestrant on ERα protein. Together, these results show that ERα modulates breast cancer cell proliferation by regulating events during the S and G₂/M phases of the cell cycle in a ligand-dependent fashion. These results provide the rationale for an effective treatment strategy that includes a cell cycle inhibitor in combination with a drug that lowers estrogen levels, such as an aromatase inhibitor, and an antiestrogen that does not result in the degradation of ERα, such as tamoxifen.     

Chromosome 11 aneuploidy detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in breast cancer: relation with progesterone receptor expression

Progesterone receptor (PR) expression is known to be impaired in breast cancer. As the PR gene is located on chromosome 11 which is also often affected, we studied their relationship in 15 patients with breast carcinoma. Tumoural imprints were used for PR immunocytochemistry and for FISH with chromosome 11 centromeric probes. Distribution profiles of chromosome 11 number in PR+ and PR- cell populations were examined. No difference in the number of chromosome 11 was found between PR+ and PR- breast tumours. Thus, loss of PR expression in breast cancer cannot be explained only by loss of chromosome 11; other genetic or non-genetic mechanisms should be advanced.     

Effects of the environmental estrogens bisphenol A, o,p'-DDT, p-tert-octylphenol and coumestrol on apoptosis induction, cell proliferation and the expression of estrogen sensitive molecular parameters in the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7

In the presented study, we have analysed effects of the environmental estrogens bisphenol A (BPA), p-tert-octylphenol (OCT), o,p'-DDT (DDT) and coumestrol (COU) on cell proliferation, apoptosis induction, progesterone receptor (PR) and androgen receptor (AR) mRNA expression and ER alpha protein expression in comparison to estradiol (E2) and the selective ER modulator (SERM) raloxifene (RAL) and the pure antiestrogen faslodex (ICI 182780) in the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. A dose dependent analysis of the cell cycle distribution of MCF-7 cells after administration of OCT, DDT and COU revealed a significant induction of cell proliferation and reduced rate of apoptosis. Maximum induction of cell proliferation and the lowest rate of apoptosis could be observed at a dose of 10(-6)M. Interestingly, administration of BPA reduces the rate of apoptosis, but does not enhance proliferation at any dose analysed. PR mRNA expression in MCF-7 cells was up regulated after administration of COU and DDT, whereas treatment with BPA and OCT did not effect PR mRNA expression. AR mRNA expression was down regulated by COU, but not effected by BPA, DDT and OCT. The expression of ER alpha protein in the breast cancer cells was slightly down regulated by COU and DDT, but unaffected by BPA and OCT. In summary and in comparison to the effects observed after administration of E2, RAL and ICI our data indicate that none of the analysed compounds exhibit properties comparable to RAL and ICI. COU and DDT exhibit properties which are very similar to E2. Administration of BPA and OCT did not effect any of the estrogen sensitive molecular parameters analysed. Nevertheless OCT is a very potent stimulator of cell proliferation in MCF-7 cells. Surprisingly, BPA is not able to induce the proliferation of MCF-7 breast cancer cells, but turns out to be a very potent inhibitor of apoptosis. For this reason and in agreement to the effects of BPA on the molecular parameters analysed, we conclude that BPA does not act in a classical estrogen like manner in MCF-7 breast cancer cells.     

Immunocytochemical versus biochemical receptor determination in normal and tumorous tissues of the female reproductive tract and the breast

The development of highly specific and sensitive monoclonal antibodies directed against human estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) provides a new approach in precise histochemical receptor location independent of hormone binding. Over the years receptor determination was the domain of the radioligand-binding assay, in which receptors are measured by tritiated ligand and unbound ligand is removed by the dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) procedure. Presented here are the results and experiences obtained by the classic DCC and the immunocytochemical method in the different normal and tumorous tissues of the female reproductive tract and the breast. The results of both methods were compared, and overall concordance of the results was found to vary considerably among the different types of tissue analyzed. Best agreement (86%) was found for PR determination in breast cancer, and the lowest rate of concordance for ER determination in fibrocystic disease of the breast. Special attention was directed toward the heterogeneity of receptor distribution in the specimens examined. In all tissues investigated, ER and PR were located in the nuclei of cells in both paraffin and frozen sections. Staining intensity varied among different cell types and from cell to cell for a single cell type, as well as in tumorous and normal tissues. In breast cancer, randomly scattered single cell receptor positivity was distinguished from focal/clonal positivity. Paraffin-embedded lymph node metastases showed significantly weaker staining as compared with their respective primary tumors. In the normal ovary, the corpus luteum and the stromal layer of the outer cortex were revealed as highly receptive elements for progestins, whereas ER was barely demonstrable in the normal ovary. Benign serous and mucinous ovarian tumors showed opposite ER and PR distribution among the stromal and epithelial components. Of special interest were the highly significant changes in ER and PR content in the stromal and glandular cells of the different layers of the normal endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle.     

Fine needle aspirate cell blocks are reliable for detection of hormone receptors and HER‐2 by immunohistochemistry in breast carcinoma

S. P. Bueno Angela, R. M. Viero and C. T. Soares Fine needle aspirate cell blocks are reliable for detection of hormone receptors and HER‐2 by immunohistochemistry in breast carcinoma Aims: To evaluate the reliability of fine needle aspirate cell blocks in the assessment of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER‐2/neu proteins by immunohistochemistry in comparison with surgical specimens. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study of 62 cases of breast carcinoma diagnosed by fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and confirmed using the surgical specimen. Immunohistochemical tests were performed to assess the presence of oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER‐2/neu proteins in cell blocks and the corresponding surgical specimens. The cell block method used alcohol prior to formalin fixation. Cases with 10% or more stained cells were considered positive for ER and PR. Positivity for HER‐2/neu was assessed on a scale of 0–3+. The criterion for positivity was a score of 3+. Results: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of the cell blocks in the investigation of ER, PR and HER‐2/neu protein (3+) were (%): ER, 92.7, 85.7, 92.7, 85.7 and 90.3; PR, 92.7, 94.7, 97.4, 87.0 and 93.5; HER‐2/neu, 70.0, 100.0, 100.0, 94.5 and 95.2. Discrepancies were seen in cell blocks in the 1+ and 2+ HER‐2/neu staining scores: two of 12 cases scoring 2+ and one case of 26 scoring 1+ on cell blocks scored 3+ on surgical specimens. The correlation index between cell block and corresponding surgical specimen varied from 90% to 94%. Conclusion: Cell blocks provide a useful method of assessing ER, PR and HER‐2/neu, mainly for inoperable and recurrent cases, but consideration should be given to carrying out FISH analysis on 1+ as well as 2+ HER‐2/neu results.