Effect of mutations in the genes su(Hw) and mod(mdg4) on transvection between alleles of the Yellow locus in Drosophila melanogaster]

A typical example of transvection is a complementation between alleles in the yellow locus: y2 (mdg4 insertion inactivating certain y-enhancers) and y1 (deletion of the y-promoter but not of the enhancer). Transvection was explained by trans-activation of promoter in y2-allele by enhancer of y1-allele. Here we found that the mutation mod(mdg4)1u1 in the modifier of mdg4 locus (a regulatory gene controlling, together with suppressor of Hairy wing) expression of (mdg4) completely suppress the complementation. Removal of an acidic domain from su(Hw) protein product in su(Hw)j mutation partially suppress the complementation. We also have found that mod(mdg4)1u1 mutation trans-inactivates the yellow allele with a wild type phenotype (y+2MC) in heterozygote with the y2 allele, i.e. the negative transvection takes place. In this case, deletion removing an acidic domain even in one copy of su(Hw) suppresses the effect of mod(mdg4)1u1 mutation.     

Novel genes influencing the expression of the yellow locus and mdg4 (gypsy) in Drosophila melanogaster

Summary We used a system with a mobilized Stalker transposable element, sometimes in combination with P-M hybrid dysgenesis, in the search for new mutations interfering with the y ² mutation induced by mdg4 (gypsy) insertion into the yellow locus. A novel gene, modifier of mdg4, was detected in chromosome 3. The mutation mod(mdg4) either enhanced or suppressed phenotypic changes in different mutations induced by mdg4 insertions. Thus, mod(mdg4) seems to be involved in the control of mdg4 expression. Six other loci designated as enhancers of yellow were also detected. The e(y) ⁿ (with n from 1–6) mutations enhanced the expression of several y mutations induced by different insertions into the yellow locus. The major change is a damage of bristle and hair pigmentation which is not suppressed by su(Hw) mutations. On the other hand, e(y) ⁿ alleles do not interact with mdg4 induced mutations in other loci. All e(y) ⁿ genes are located in different regions of the X chromosome. One may speculate that e(y) ⁿ genes are involved in trans-regulation of the yellow locus and possibly of some other loci.     

Genetic and molecular complexity of the position effect variegation modifier mod(mdg4) in Drosophila

mod(mdg4), also known as E(var)3-93D, is involved in a variety of processes, such as gene silencing in position effect variegation (PEV), the control of gypsy insulator sequences, regulation of homeotic gene expression, and programmed cell death. We have isolated a large number of mod(mdg4) cDNAs, representing 21 different isoforms generated by alternative splicing. The deduced proteins are characterized by a common N terminus of 402 amino acids, including the BTB/POZ-domain. Most of the variable C termini contain a new consensus sequence, including four positioned hydrophobic amino acids and a Cys(2)His(2) motif. Using specific antibodies for two protein isoforms, we demonstrate different distributions of the corresponding proteins on polytene chromosomes. Mutations in the genomic region encoding exons 1-4 show enhancement of PEV and homeotic transformation and affect viability and fertility. Homeotic and PEV phenotypes are enhanced by mutations in other trx-group genes. A transgene containing the common 5' region of mod(mdg4) that is present in all splice variants known so far partially rescues the recessive lethality of mod(mdg4) mutant alleles. Our data provide evidence that the molecular and genetic complexity of mod(mdg4) is caused by a large set of individual protein isoforms with specific functions in regulating the chromatin structure of different sets of genes throughout development.     

Role of the mod(mdg4) common region in homolog segregation in Drosophila male meiosis

Homologous chromosomes must pair and establish stable connections during prophase I of meiosis to segregate reliably from each other at anaphase I. In most organisms, the stable connections, called chiasmata, arise from crossovers. In Drosophila males, homologs pair and segregate without crossing over. Chiasmata are replaced by a homolog conjunction complex that includes the Stromalin in Meiosis (SNM) and Modifier of Mdg4 in Meiosis (MNM) proteins. MNM is one of 31 alternative splice products of mod(mdg4), all of which share a common 402-amino-acid N terminus and differ at their C termini. Previous data demonstrated that an MNM-specific exon is required for homolog conjunction, but did not address whether the N-terminal common region, which includes a BTB domain that can mediate coalescence of protein-DNA complexes, is also required. Here we describe a mutation in the common region of mod(mdg4), Z3-3401, that causes qualitatively similar phenotypes as the MNM-specific alleles but disrupts X-Y segregation much more drastically than autosomal segregation. The mutant MNM protein in Z3-3401 is expressed throughout prophase I in spermatocytes but the protein is confined to the cytoplasm, suggesting that the Z3-3401 mutation disrupts a signal required for nuclear localization or retention. Z3-3401 fails to complement a large battery of lethal and semilethal alleles in the common region for meiotic nondisjunction, including an allele containing an amino acid substitution at a conserved residue in the BTB/POZ domain, consistent with a general requirement for the mod(mdg4) common region in homolog segregation.     

High rate of DNA loss in the Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila virilis species groups

We recently proposed that patterns of evolution of non-LTR retrotransposable elements can be used to study patterns of spontaneous mutation. Transposition of non-LTR retrotransposable elements commonly results in creation of 5' truncated, "dead-on-arrival" copies. These inactive copies are effectively pseudogenes and, according to the neutral theory, their molecular evolution ought to reflect rates and patterns of spontaneous mutation. Maximum parsimony can be used to separate the evolution of active lineages of a non-LTR element from the fate of the "dead-on-arrival" insertions and to directly assess the relative frequencies of different types of spontaneous mutations. We applied this approach using a non-LTR element, Helena, in the Drosophila virilis group and have demonstrated a surprisingly high incidence of large deletions and the virtual absence of insertions. Based on these results, we suggested that Drosophila in general may exhibit a high rate of spontaneous large deletions and have hypothesized that such a high rate of DNA loss may help to explain the puzzling dearth of bona fide pseudogenes in Drosophila. We also speculated that variation in the rate of spontaneous deletion may contribute to the divergence of genome size in different taxa by affecting the amount of superfluous "junk" DNA such as, for example, pseudogenes or long introns. In this paper, we extend our analysis to the D. melanogaster subgroup, which last shared a common ancestor with the D. virilis group approximately 40 MYA. In a different region of the same transposable element, Helena, we demonstrate that inactive copies accumulate deletions in species of the D. melanogaster subgroup at a rate very similar to that of the D. virilis group. These results strongly suggest that the high rate of DNA loss is a general feature of Drosophila and not a peculiar property of a particular stretch of DNA in a particular species group.      

Integrity of the Mod(mdg4)-67.2 BTB domain is critical to insulator function in Drosophila melanogaster

The Drosophila gypsy insulator contains binding sites for the Suppressor of Hairy-wing [Su(Hw)] protein. Enhancer and silencer blocking require Su(Hw) recruitment of Mod(mdg4)-67.2, a BTB/POZ domain protein that interacts with Su(Hw) through a carboxyl-terminal acidic domain. Here we conducted mutational analyses of the Mod(mdg4)-67.2 BTB domain. We demonstrate that this domain is essential for insulator function, in part through direction of protein dimerization. Our studies revealed the presence of a second domain (DD) that contributes to Mod(mdg4)-67.2 dimerization when the function of the BTB domain is compromised. Additionally, we demonstrate that mutations in amino acids of the charged pocket in the BTB domain that retain dimerization of the mutated protein cause a loss of insulator function. In these cases, the mutant proteins failed to localize to chromosomes, suggesting a role for the BTB domain in chromosome association. Interestingly, replacement of the Mod(mdg4)-67.2 BTB domain with the GAF BTB domain produced a nonfunctional protein. Taken together, these data suggest that the Mod(mdg4)-67.2 BTB domain confers novel activities to gypsy insulator function.     

Comparative Analysis of Pdf-Mediated Circadian Behaviors Between Drosophila melanogaster and D. virilis

PAR proteins (partitioning defective) are major regulators of cell polarity and asymmetric cell division. One of the par genes, par-1, encodes a Ser/Thr kinase that is conserved from yeast to mammals. In Caenorhabditis elegans, par-1 governs asymmetric cell division by ensuring the polar distribution of cell fate determinants. However the precise mechanisms by which PAR-1 regulates asymmetric cell division in C. elegans remain to be elucidated. We performed a genomewide RNAi screen and identified six genes that specifically suppress the embryonic lethal phenotype associated with mutations in par-1. One of these suppressors is mpk-1, the C. elegans homolog of the conserved mitogen activated protein (MAP) kinase ERK. Loss of function of mpk-1 restored embryonic viability, asynchronous cell divisions, the asymmetric distribution of cell fate specification markers, and the distribution of PAR-1 protein in par-1 mutant embryos, indicating that this genetic interaction is functionally relevant for embryonic development. Furthermore, disrupting the function of other components of the MAPK signaling pathway resulted in suppression of par-1 embryonic lethality. Our data therefore indicates that MAP kinase signaling antagonizes PAR-1 signaling during early C. elegans embryonic polarization.ASYMMETRIC cell division, a process in which a mother cell divides in two different daughter cells, is a fundamental mechanism to achieve cell diversity during development. We use the early embryo of Caenorhabditis elegans as a model system to study asymmetric cell division. The C. elegans one-cell embryo divides asymmetrically along its anteroposterior axis, generating two cells of different sizes and fates: the larger anterior daughter cell will generate somatic tissues while the smaller posterior daughter cell will generate the germline (Sulston et al. 1983).A group of proteins called PAR proteins (partitioning defective) is required for asymmetric cell division in C. elegans (Kemphues et al. 1988). Depletion of any of the seven par genes (par-1 to -6 and pkc-3) leads to defects in asymmetric cell division and embryonic lethality (Kemphues et al. 1988; Kirby et al. 1990; Tabuse et al. 1998; Hung and Kemphues 1999; Hao et al. 2006). PAR-3 and PAR-6 are conserved proteins that contain PDZ-domains and form a complex with PKC-3 (Etemad-Moghadam et al. 1995; Izumi et al. 1998; Tabuse et al. 1998; Hung and Kemphues 1999). This complex becomes restricted to the anterior cortex of the embryo in response to spatially defined actomyosin contractions occurring in the embryo upon fertilization (Goldstein and Hird 1996; Munro et al. 2004). The posterior cortex of the embryo that becomes devoid of the anterior PAR proteins is occupied by the RING protein PAR-2 and the Ser/Thr kinase PAR-1 (Guo and Kemphues 1995; Boyd et al. 1996; Cuenca et al. 2003). Once polarized, the anterior and posterior PAR proteins mutually exclude each other from their respective cortices (Etemad-Moghadam et al. 1995; Boyd et al. 1996; Cuenca et al. 2003; Hao et al. 2006). Loss of function of the gene par-1, as opposed to loss of most other par genes, results in embryos that exhibit only subtle effects on the polarized cortical domains occupied by the other PAR proteins (Cuenca et al. 2003). However defects in this gene are associated with a more symmetric division in size, an aberrant distribution of cell fate specification markers, altered cell fates of the daughter cells of the embryo, and ultimately embryonic lethality (Kemphues et al. 1988; Guo and Kemphues 1995).PAR-1 controls asymmetric cell division and cell fate specification by regulating the localization of the two highly similar CCCH-type zinc-finger proteins MEX-5 and MEX-6 (referred to as MEX-5/6). MEX-5 and MEX-6 are 70% identical in their amino acid sequence and fulfill partially redundant functions in the embryo (Schubert et al. 2000). In wild-type animals, endogenous MEX-5 and GFP fusions of MEX-6 localize primarily to the anterior of the embryo while both proteins are evenly distributed in par-1 mutant embryos (Schubert et al. 2000; Cuenca et al. 2003). This suggests that in wild-type animals, PAR-1 acts in part by restricting MEX-5 and MEX-6 to the anterior of the embryo. The precise mechanism of this regulation is not known, but an elegant study performed for MEX-5 indicates that differential protein mobility in the anterior and posterior cytoplasm of the one-cell embryo contributes to this asymmetry (Tenlen et al. 2008). While increased mobility in the posterior of the one-cell embryo correlates with a par-1- and par-4-dependent phosphorylation on MEX-5, the kinase directly phosphorylating MEX-5 remains to be identified (Tenlen et al. 2008).Some of the phenotypes associated with loss of par-1 function are dependent on the function of mex-5 and mex-6. First, loss of function of par-1 leads to a decreased stability and aberrant localization of the posterior cell fate specification marker PIE-1, a protein that is usually inherited by the posterior daughter cell in wild-type animals and ensures the correct specification of the germline (Mello et al. 1996; Seydoux et al. 1996). This decreased stability is dependent on mex-5/6 function as PIE-1 levels are restored, albeit with symmetrical distribution, in mex-6(RNAi); mex-5(RNAi); par-1(b274) embryos (Schubert et al. 2000; Cuenca et al. 2003; Derenzo et al. 2003). Second, embryos lacking par-1 function exhibit decreased amounts of P granules in the one-cell embryo, while these markers are present in mex-6(pk440); mex-5(zu199); par-1(RNAi) embryos of comparable age (Cheeks et al. 2004). Third, in par-1(RNAi) one-cell embryos the posterior cortical domain occupied by the polarity protein PAR-2 is extended anteriorly, when compared to wild-type embryos (Cuenca et al. 2003). This anterior extension is rescued in embryos deficient for both par-1 and mex-5/6 (Cuenca et al. 2003). Taken together, these results indicate that par-1 acts in the embryo—at least in part—by regulating the localization and/or activity of the proteins MEX-5 and MEX-6. However, it remains unclear whether other proteins can modulate PAR-1 function to affect MEX-5/6 activity.To gain insight into the mechanisms of par-1 function in the embryo, we sought to identify genes that act together with par-1 during embryonic development. We performed an RNAi-based screen for genetic interactors of the temperature-sensitive allele par-1(zu310), using the embryonic lethal phenotype of this mutant as a readout. This method has proven successful in previous screens to identify genes involved in early embryonic processes (Labbé et al. 2006; O''Rourke et al. 2007). We were able to identify six genes that, upon disruption of their function, suppress the embryonic lethal phenotype of par-1 mutant embryos. One of these genes is mpk-1, the C. elegans homolog of the highly conserved MAP kinase ERK. Closer analysis subsequently showed that reduction of function of mpk-1 not only increases viability of par-1 mutant embryos, but also reverts several polarity phenotypes associated with loss of function of par-1. Our data indicate that mpk-1 antagonizes par-1 activity to regulate polarization and asymmetric cell divisions in the early embryo.     

A comparative study of male meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster and D. virilis

Male meiosis in D. melanogaster cytologically follows the usual pattern, whereas in D. melanogaster and in D. virilis oocytes the chromosomes clump into a karyosphere at early meiotic prophase and remain so up to metaphase I.Male meiosis in D. virilis spermatocytes has an intermediate character: a part of the chromatin clumps together in a karyosphere at early prophase, whereas the other part of the chromatin remains diffuse all through prophase. At the end of prophase, the diffuse chromatin becomes integrated into the karyosphere before metaphase I. During the meiotic divisions the chromosomes have the same clumped aspect as those in Drosophila oocytes and thus differ strikingly from the dividing chromosomes in D. melanogaster spermatocytes.In D. virilis spermatocytes the nucleolus exhibits changes during the meiotic prophase that may be related to synthetical activities. The DNA specific staining with the fluorochrome DAPI reveals the existence of extrachromosomal DNA in the later prophase. Other striking differences in meiotic events between the two Drosophila species concern the centrioles and spermiogenesis.     

Strategic differences in thermal adaptation between two Drosophila species,D. virilis and D. immigrans

Summary Preadult viability and developmental time at four different temperatures, heat and cold resistances of adult flies, effects of acclimatization on heat resistance, and preferred temperature of adult flies were compared between two species of Drosophila, D. virilis and D. immigrans. Four Japanese local populations were surveyed for each species. As compared with immigrans, virilis was higher in its ability to tolerate both heat and cold stresses and was viable over a broader temperature range. On the other hand, immigrans revealed a superior ability to acclimatize and a rigid preference for gradually changing thermal environment. Differences between geographical populations are remarkable for heat tolerance in virilis and cold tolerance in immigrans. In conclusion, thermal adaptation of virilis seems to be based on the high tolerance to extreme temperatures and that of immigrans mainly on the behavioural preference for viable temperatures.     

Doom, a product of the Drosophila mod(mdg4) gene, induces apoptosis and binds to baculovirus inhibitor-of-apoptosis proteins.

A family of baculovirus inhibitor-of-apoptosis (IAP) genes is present in mammals, insects, and baculoviruses, but the mechanism by which they block apoptosis is unknown. We have identified a protein encoded by the Drosophila mod(mdg4) gene which bound to the baculovirus IAPs. This protein induced rapid apoptosis in insect cells, and consequently we have named it Doom. Baculovirus IAPs and P35, an inhibitor of aspartate-specific cysteine proteases, blocked Doom-induced apoptosis. The carboxyl terminus encoded by the 3' exon of the doom cDNA, which distinguishes it from other mod(mdg4) cDNAs, was responsible for induction of apoptosis and engagement of the IAPs. Doom localized to the nucleus, while the IAPs localized to the cytoplasm, but when expressed together, Doom and the IAPs both localized in the nucleus. Thus, IAPs might block apoptosis by interacting with and modifying the behavior of Doom-like proteins that reside in cellular apoptotic pathways.